QOS - VOIP traffic: payload and signalling

Two questions For VOIP traffic,
Q.1. should the payload and signalling be assigned the same COS ?? to avoid losing Signalling traffic.
Q.2. flash upgrades to the phone sets are tftp. Should this traffic be assigned COS=0 or the same cos as the signalling traffic ? Phone flash gets corrupted if some of these packets are lost ?
thanks for your help,

Hello,
best practice puts signaling into another class than voip "payload" as you named it.
The reason is that the qos requirements are different. Signaling needs guaranteed bandwidth, voip needs low delay and guaranteed bandwidth.
TFTP can be placed into signaling class or in a separate class.
An example config could look like this:
ip cef
class-map match-any VoIP
match ip dscp ef cs5
match protocol rtp audio
class-map match-any VoIPsignal
match ip dscp cs3
class-map match-all TFTP
match protocol tftp
policy-map VoIPprio
class VoIP
priority percent 10
class VoIPsignal
bandwidth remaining percent 5
class TFTP
bandwidth remaining percent 5
class class-default
fair-queue
random-detect
interface Serial0
ip address ...
service-policy output VoIPprio
You would have to adjust the bandwith ratios for your needs and the interface naming to your environment.
The policy will give 10% of the link to voip traffic with lowest possible delay, 5% of the rest for voip signaling, 5% to TFTP and the rest for the other data present.
Hope this helps

Similar Messages

  • Configuring QoS for FIOS Router MI-424WR: Traffic Priority and Shaping

    Please only read on if you are an experienced internet user familiar with setting the advanced QoS and Firewall settings for the MI-424WR and make use of wireless adaptors from a PC to provide connectivity.
    This is my first post and my first week since I moved from Time Warner Cable over to FIOS for iNet (plus HDTV and phone).     While all my services work, the router as delivered and setup is not optimum for internet quality of service.  Instead it was probably out of the box optimized for HDTV and telephone to satisfy most customers and reduce support overhead.   The average FIOS consumer is multimedia sensitive, but that is not so in my genre of internet consumer.   Here in lies the core of my reason for seeking help from like minded and experienced users in this community.
    One of the main driving forces in my switching to FIOS was to improve my multiplayer gaming experience where ultra low ping latency and high upload data rates dramatically affect the quality of connection and thus gameplay.    The cable internet service from TimeWarner was providing solid 2MB/1MB down/up data rates with no issues like what Im having now with FIOS.   Again the reason for the switch was both financial and in hope of gaining better data rates and quality of service.   Now with FIOS Im getting about 24/15 down/up data rate on the Extreme FIOS 25/25 plan when measured from my house to Los Angeles server (50 miles away) via Speedtest.net or DslReports.com/tests.     Latency wise, the ping has gone down from 150 to 50ms when measured to my friends who I connect to online that are on the East coast.   The data rate and latency has greatly improved in going from Cable to FIOS.   So far, so good.
    Where the problem shows up now, is that now I get an internet "hiccup" every 5-10 minutes that lasts about 1/2 to 2 seconds.   For the average internet user that just streams multimedia or cruises on the net; this is probably undetectable or noticed.   I never had this problem over the same PCs connected wirelessly to my DLINK DGL-4500 Gaming Router when my ISP was TimeWarner's cable service.    Now, using the FIOS and MI-424WR router with everythings being the same; Im experiencing this degregation in quality of service.    Even putting the PC's IP into the DMZ doesnt make any difference, so it is not related to port forwarding.    The issue is squarely in the lap of FIOS and this router as delivered and configured.    This is where the "game" is a foot, and where I need expertise in an area Im new to. 
    I am not new to being hands on with inet trouble shooting asI have been setting up my own home network (I work from home over VPN to work) for decades;  I would like to leverage the skills of those who are experts in the area that I think can address this issue.   That being QoS and the other device class mechanisms of this router.   Its my guess that this periodic hiccup can be minimized and even eliminated using these advanced features of this all-in-one TV/iNet/Tele router.   
    With that context being laid down, this hiccup doesnt show up if:
    a.  I connect two PCs connected to the same ethernet hub of the MI-424WR (traffic just over the LAN and not WAN)
    b.  When I was on Cable with my own gaming router wirelessly DHCP connected to my PC and using port forwarding or using the DMZ.  
    The hiccup does exist when:
    a.  Going from internet through the MI-424WR to the wireless DHCP connected PC with port forwarding
    b.  Even putting the wireless DHCP connected PC into the MI-424WR's DMZ has no effect
    I did read the manual and tried some QoS pritority and shaping and managed to reduce how often the hiccup occured, but I was just making guesses at the settings.   I put in the IP for the PCs I use for my gaming applications (which are very ping and jitter sensitive) into the QoS priority (value 7) and shaping GUI.    Im hoping someone with experience can tell me exactly how to use it and what settings to input.   Im not clear on the device and connection types offered in the QoS menus. 
    Another thing, is I couldnt find settings for the turning on/off the ICMP echo.   But I assume this is on because it can be pinged by folks on the net to my WAN IP.
    Here is the manual for the Verizon provided M424WR router (Current Version of firmware: 20.10.7)
    download link
    Here are the QoS traffic priority and shaping values Ive been experimenting with:
    Click to view QoS Traffic Priority
    Click to view QoS Traffic Shaping
    And why it matters to have a solid and stable inet connection for internet gaming?  The hiccup causes slewing or jitter which equates to positional errors in the 3D world that ruins the smooth gameplay that is needed for high end gaming.
    Heres a snapshot of me flying the wing of another flight simmer who is on the East coast and me on the West coast.
    Click to view
    Thank you in advance.
    Thomas "AV8R"
    MSEE

    TMAS wrote:
    the router as delivered and setup is not optimum for internet quality of service.  Instead it was probably out of the box optimized for HDTV and telephone to satisfy most customers and reduce support overhead.  
    That's not accurate.  VZ telephone service does not go through the Actiontec.  Also, there are no default settings for QOS in the Actiontec since QOS is rarely needed with FIOS upload speeds.
    TMAS wrote:I get an internet "hiccup" every 5-10 minutes that lasts about 1/2 to 2 seconds.  
       You should not be experiencing periodic "hiccups".  Something is clearly amiss.
    TMAS wrote:
    With that context being laid down, this hiccup doesnt show up if:a.  I connect two PCs connected to the same ethernet hub of the MI-424WR (traffic just over the LAN and not WAN)
    The hiccup does exist when:
    a.  Going from internet through the MI-424WR to the wireless DHCP connected PC with port forwarding
    b.  Even putting the wireless DHCP connected PC into the MI-424WR's DMZ has no effect
    Lets see.  The issue shows up on a wireless connection, but not a wired connection.  You think this is a QOS issue and not a wireless issue why?  Have you tried changing the wireless channel?  It very possible you have neighbors on the same channel.  Is the DGL-4500 wireless still on?  Could that be interfering?TMAS wrote:
    Another thing, is I couldnt find settings for the turning on/off the ICMP echo.  
    The settting to enable/disable ICMP echo is on the Firewall/Remote Administration page.
    TMAS wrote:
    Here are the QoS traffic priority and shaping values Ive been experimenting with:Click to view QoS Traffic Priority
    Click to view QoS Traffic Shaping 
    The traffic proirity settings you linked are applied only to your wireless connections.  QOS between the router and your wireless PC will only serve to prioritize traffic between the router and that PC and have no affect on your internet traffic.  Assuming you are not running browsers, VOIP and other traffic from that PC while you're gaming, then that will not accomplish anything.  i.e.  You're giving your only traffic highest priority, but that traffic is not competing with anything (except other nearby wireless connections on the same channel).
    On the traffic shaping screenshot, you have broadband ethernet checked, but according to your other thread, your WAN connection is Broadband Coax, not Broadband ethernet.

  • Can an RV082 dedicate voip traffic to a t1, and split the rest to DSL?

    Hello all,
    I have been struggling to get this rv082 setup properly.
    What I am trying to do is take two internet connections, a broadband & a T1, and dedicate them for specific tasks.
    I have setup the IP's and Ranges of Ports for TCP/UDP to point to Wan2 (T1) for our VOIP applications; however all our traffic still routes through Wan1 (Broadband).
    Both connections are setup with static IP's. I have tried doing Load Balancing with no luck. It seems that it doesnt bring up Wan2 untill wan1 fails. In fact, sometimes in status it will show that it doesnt even have an IP (but settings are correct).
    Is there something that I am missing, or does this Rv082 not really support dedicated QoS/Directing like this, and is meant to be more of a backup solution?
    If is cant, what should we be looking at? The Rv016 says it clearly can do this, but the directions look almost identical to the rv082.
    If the RV082 can do this, could anyone please suggest what I may have setup wrong?

    Moved this discussion from Technologies for Small Businesses to Small Business Routers
    Thank you!
    Message was edited by: Cindy Toy

  • UCS QoS, VoIP applications and upstream switch

    Hi,
    We have followings:
    Chassis 5108
    FI 6248
    FEX 2208
    Adapter VIC(1240), 2 vNIC for VMData (VoIP applications), a few others vNIC for mgmt, vmotion etc.
    ESXi 5.1
    CUCM, Unity, etc
    For example, CUCM and Unity marked VoIP media as CoS 5 and signaling as 3.
    Will FI overwrite all markings to CoS 5 if VMData vNIC QoS policy is created as platinum with host control FULL (see picture)?
    In other words, will the upstream switch see the same QoS markings from VoIP applications?
    Thanks,
    Harry

    Hello Harry,
    Here is a good link ondesign recommendations on QoS + UC ( VoIP apps ) + UCS
    http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/QoS_Design_Considerations_for_Virtual_UC_with_UCS#Guidelines_for_Physical_LAN_Links.2C_Trunking_and_Traffic_Sizing
    HTH
    Padma

  • QoS Setup for Whatsapp and VOIP application

    Hello guys,
                        I own a WAG320N modem. I wasnted to setup QoS priority for 2 applications "Whatsapp" and a VOIP application which allows me to call from a computer to a mobile phone. I use torrent applications and they take all the bandwidth. Hence i was looking to configure QoS for these two applications.
                         I went to the QoS page and they are asking about the application details such as port range etc. I don't know what value to be filled. I have posted a screenshot below of what its asking. Can anyone help me fill these details for both applications.
    Thank you in advance
    Image: http://i40.tinypic.com/2qi02z5.jpg
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    You can basically add Viber on the QoS. Under Applications and Gaming, click on QoS then enable the Internet Access Priority. On the Catergory, look for Applications>Add a New Application. Then you can enter the name of the Application. You may now add the port numbers. And since it's a specific port and not range, you do it this way;
        5242 - 5242 TCP (for the protocol)
        4244 - 4244 TCP
        5243 - 5243 UDP
        9785 - 9785 UDP
    Hope this helps.

  • How does QoS work with WAAS WCCP? What's the interaction between QoS Traffic Classification and WAE Traffic Application Policy?

    How does QoS work with WAAS WCCP? What's the interaction between Router QoS Traffic Classification and WAE Traffic Application Policy?

    By default, WAAS preserves the DSCP marking on intercepted packets.  There is a configuration option to set/override the DSCP value at the global (device), application, and classifier levels.  Currently WAAS provides marking only.  There is no action taken by WAAS based on the DSCP value.
    Regards,
    Zach

  • QoS Traffic shaping and peak shaping

    Hi,
    Could somebody tell me what is the difference between traffic shaping and peak shaping?
    Kind Regards.

    Standard traffic shaping (the shape average command) will keep the average rate of the traffic to the limit you specify, which should be the committed rate of your circuit.
    Peak shaping will also do traffic shaping (using queues, etc), guaranteeing a minimum rate, but will allow traffic to levels to burst above your configured (committed) rate.
    From the documentation:
    Traffic shaping limits the rate of transmission of data. In addition to using a specifically configured transmission rate, you can use Generic Traffic Shaping (GTS) to specify a derived transmission rate based on the level of congestion.
    You can specify two types of traffic shaping; average rate shaping and peak rate shaping. Average rate shaping limits the transmission rate to the CIR. Using the CIR ensures that the average amount of traffic being sent conforms to the rate expected by the network.
    Peak rate shaping configures the router to send more traffic than the CIR. To determine the peak rate, the router uses the following formula:
    peak rate = CIR(1 + Be / Bc)
    where:
    •Be is the Excess Burst size.
    •Bc is the Committed Burst size.
    Peak rate shaping allows the router to burst higher than average rate shaping. However, using peak rate shaping, the traffic sent above the CIR (the delta) could be dropped if the network becomes congested.
    If your network has additional bandwidth available (over the provisioned CIR) and the application or class can tolerate occasional packet loss, that extra bandwidth can be exploited through the use of peak rate shaping. However, there may be occasional packet drops when network congestion occurs. If the traffic being sent to the network must strictly conform to the configured network provisioned CIR, then you should use average traffic shaping.
    Examples
    The following example sets the uses average rate shaping to ensure a bandwidth of 256 kbps:
    shape average 256000
    The following example uses peak rate shaping to ensure a bandwidth of 300 kbps but allow throughput up to 512 kbps if enough bandwidth is available on the interface:
    bandwidth 300
    shape peak 512000

  • Catalyst 2950-EMI, QoS, traffic classification and shaping

    Dear All,
    Can 2950-EMI perform traffic classification and shaping?
    Let's say I have some workstations attached on my 2950 and I want to perform traffic classification and shaping on the uplink based on the IP address of workstations.
    Thanks a lot.
    mak

    Shaping is not supported. But you can classify and use policing instead.
    http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat2950/12120ea2/2950scg/swqos.htm

  • Nexus 5500 VoIP cos 3 and FCoE

    Hi
    I have a requirment to do QoS for a DC that includes some VoIP as well FCoE with CNAs in the servers. I want to use COS 3 for the VoIP signalling and drop it in the same input and output quues to the servers as FCoE.
    so we have
    class-map type qos class-fcoe
    class-map type queuing class-fcoe
      match qos-group 1
    which is the default for FCoE and I have 50% bandwidth assoicated with it.
    policy-map type queuing
         class type queuing class-fcoe
           bandwidth percent 50
         class type queing someother class etc
    The issue is the "class-fcoe" is a default class and there doesnt seem to be anywhere I can edit it to add the VOIP control traffic to the same class or can I just add it here:
    class-map type queuing match any class-fcoe
      match qos-group 1
      match cos 3
    Thanks
    Pat

    Hmm
    From the UCS 8 SRND
    For instance, voice signaling traffic with L3 DSCP  value of CS3 is mapped to L2 CoS value of 3 by Nexus 1000V. All Fibre  Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) traffic is marked with L2 CoS value of 3 by  Cisco UCS. When voice signaling and FCoE traffic enter the Cisco  UCS 6100 Fabric Interconnect Switch, both will carry a CoS value of 3.  In this situation voice signaling traffic will share queues and  scheduling with the Fibre Channel priority class and will be given  lossless behavior. (Fibre Channel priority class for CoS 3 in the  UCS 6100 Fabric Interconnect Switch does not imply that the class cannot  be shared with other types of traffic.)
    This seems ti pmply you can run Call SIgnalling COS 3 in the same queueu as FCOE COS 3. I kow its talking about a 6100 fabric switch but thats very similar to a 5500.
    Could I not do something like:
    class-map type qos match-all voice-signal-global
       match-cos 3
    policy-map type qos classify-global
       class voice-signal-global
          set qos-group 1
       class class-fcoe
          set qos-group 1
    But then I cant see how to link this where we set the queuing bandwidth percentages as this uses the "class-fcoe"
    policy-map type queuing global-fcoe-queuing-in
       class type queuing class-fcoe
          bandwidth percent 50
    Could I create a class to replace "class-fcoe" and jsut match on qos-group 1 to define whats in it ?
    Regards
    Pat

  • WRR QoS unused traffic classes

    We are planning QoS for the enterprise LAN and MPLS core. At present, there are 5 traffic classes identified and no VoIP traffic. We could allocate resources and bandwidth for 5 queues and deploy such configs. But I guess it's worth defining all 8 classes and allocate queue limits and bandwidth to them. Later it will be easier to mark the new traffic and classify it into the unused queues without modifying the wrr config.
    67xx 1p7q8t line card
    Q3 and Q8(PQ) will not be used. 5+15% is allocated to them.
    priority-queue queue-limit 15
    wrr-queue queue-limit 30 15 5 10 15 5 5
    wrr-queue bandwidth percent 30 15 5 10 15 5 5
    I'm not sure if the allocated bandwidth and queue limit for the unused queues will affect  the existing traffic and limit the aggregated traffic quantity. Will the 5 classes be able to fill the bandwidth until there is no congestion? What happens in case of congestion? Can the traffic excess 80% or not? (For simplicity, 100% is regarded as a fraction of link capacity defined by max-reserved-bandwidth)

    Disclaimer
    The  Author of this posting offers the information contained within this  posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that  there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose.  Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not  be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this  posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In  no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including,  without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out  of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author  has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    Generally, unless you're shaping or policing, bandwidth sharing commands provide a minimum bandwidth guarantee, and unused bandwidth can be used by other queues.  Also when working with more than one queue, relative ratios are usually preserved.  So, for instance, if q1 was configured for 25%, q2 for 25% and q3 for 50%, if q2 had no traffic, and q1 and q3 wanted all they could have, they would split the bandwidth 1:2 or 1/3 to 2/3.

  • Cisco 2960x - auto qos voip cisco-phone on access ports

    After configuring "auto qos voip cisco-phone" on a stack of 2960x switches, we later noticed that after a power cycle (config was saved first) it went missing when doing a "show run" from the interface configs, on one of the switches (g1/0/1-48 had it applied, then after power cycle it didn't show).  However, doing a "show auto qos interface" shows it is still applied to all interfaces g10/1-48. 
    I try to do "auto qos voip cisco-phone" again on g1/0/1-48, and it shows this:
    SwitchStack01(config-if-range)#auto qos voip cisco-phone
    AutoQoS Error: AutoQoS already configured
    % Range command terminated because it failed on GigabitEthernet1/0/1
    If I attempt to remove "auto qos voip cisco-phone", it shows this:
    SwitchStack01(config-if-range)#no auto qos voip cisco-phone
    AutoQoS Error: AutoQoS not configured
    % Range command terminated because it failed on GigabitEthernet1/0/1
    When I do a "show run", it is no longer displayed for the first switch of the stack.So is it still applied to the interfaces or not?   Is this a bug?  Has anyone else experienced this?  This has happened to at least a couple stacks of 2960x's we have. 
    Thanks!

    It appears to be a bug in the code.  Open a TAC ticket with Cisco and send them the output and the IOS version you are using so they can help you resolve the issue.   Most likely, they recommend an upgrade.
    HTH

  • 3850 - auto qos voip cisco-phone

    I am having an issue where it appears that the "auto qos voip cisco-phone" command is marking down my voice packets COS and DSCP values to 0.  Anyone else notice this?  I am connecting Cisco 7945 phone to the interfaces with this command applied to the interface.  I verified that the IP Phone is sending COS = 5 and DSCP = ef to the switchport.  I verified the packets inbound to the switchport and the packets outbound as they transit to the destination IP Phone's switchport.

    Hi joshua,
    What is the IOS-XE version you are running on your 3850 ?
    Post your switchport configuration (7945 phone connected)
    Here is 3.3 QoS config guide & I noticed it says something like below qouted. So make sure this trust device command is there & your port is configured for standard VoIP port connectivity.(like voice vlan, etc)
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3850/software/release/3se/consolidated_guide/configuration_guide/b_consolidated_3850_3se_cg/b_consolidated_3850_3se_cg_chapter_01101000.html#reference_8A1C35AB2874498F90C4F5600301BE9D
    "The trust device device_type interface configuration command is only supported in an auto-QoS configuration, and not as a stand-alone command on the switch. When using the trust device device_type interface configuration command in an auto-QoS configuration, if the connected peer device is not a corresponding device (defined as a device matching your trust policy), both CoS and DSCP values are set to "0" and any input policy will not take effect"
    HTH
    Rasika
    ***** Pls rate all useful responses ****

  • Auto QoS Voip Trust question

    Hello,
    I am a little confused on the auto qos voip trust command. I am reading that it should be used on interior switchports like trunk ports connected to another switch. I guess my question is this: If the auto qos voip command tells the switchport to trust the incoming CoS values, then isnt it redundant to tell the port to "trust" the incoming CoS value when the auto qos voip command is already accomplishing this? Or does this have something to do with trusting DSCP values instead of CoS values? If so, why are we trusting DSCP values at the uplinks and not CoS values coming from the IP Phone? Im so confused. Thanks for any light you can shed on this topic.
    Chris.

    Chris
    Yes, the trust value used for "auto qos voip trust" depends on the operation of the port as you say.
    And yes when you use the "cisco-phone" option it will trust the values but as you say only if it detects a Cisco IP phone and it does this by using CDP. 
    What is not entirely clear, at least to me, is exactly which markings the "cisco-phone" option trusts. There seems to be conflicting information but the configuration guide talk about DSCP markings so it may be those but i can't say for sure as i have limited experience in that area.
    Jon

  • Traffic Shaping and Priortization in ASA

    Hi Everyone,
    I  read that traffic prioritixation is always applied outbound direction when traffic is trying to leave the ASA.
    Also i read that traffic Shaping can be applied to all outgoing traffic on a interface.
    need to know if traffic shaping and priortization means same thing in ASA ?
    There direction is always  outbound?
    Regards
    MAhesh

    Hello Mahesh,
    Not sure I get it but let me see if I can help,
    Priority traffic: Basically allows you to split the interface into 2 different queues, one for low latency traffic and the other for best effor traffic. The one being on the Priority queue will always get served first.
    Traffic Shapping:It's the buffering QoS techique that allows you to configure a limit of bandwith that you will provide to a certain traffic class, when you reach that limit the traffic that goes over the limit will be placed into a software queue, where it will be "holded". That's the different between traffic shapping and policing as whit traffic policing you will drop the offending traffic, with shapping you will hold it (so this is not good for Low latency traffic).
    Now regarding the direction Traffic shapping can only be done on the outbound direction as queuing is an outbound process.
    For Networking Posts check my blog at http://www.laguiadelnetworking.com/category/english/
    Cheers,
    Julio Carvajal Segura

  • Z600 workstation missing pci data acquisition and signal processing controller driver

    I just installed Win7 Pro x86 on my Z600 workstation.  It was an upgrade from WinXP Pro.  In Device Manager I am missing the driver for the PCI Data Acquisition and Signal Processing Controller and Hardlock USB 1.02.  Can someone assist me in finding these drivers.  I looked on the Support/Drivers page for this  model but couldn't find anything.
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Hi,
    You might get better assistance on the HP Enterprise Business Forum since you have a professional worktsation.
    HP DV9700, t9300, Nvidia 8600, 4GB, Crucial C300 128GB SSD
    HP Photosmart Premium C309G, HP Photosmart 6520
    HP Touchpad, HP Chromebook 11
    Custom i7-4770k,Z-87, 8GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650,GTX 760
    Custom i7-4790k,Z-97, 16GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Plextor M.2 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650, GTX 660TI
    Windows 7/8 UEFI/Legacy mode, MBR/GPT

Maybe you are looking for

  • Screen popping when closing--2012 Macbook Air

    Is it normal for the screen or hinge to make a popping sound sometimes when closing the lid? Particularly after extended periods of use, my MBA's screen will make a soft popping noise as I start to close the lid; I can also feel the popping in my han

  • Can't import file to imovie

    I purchased a video animation and downloaded fil, no problem, I can watch the file just fine in quicktime, (PRO)but when I try to import it into my imovie project it says it can't open the file. My question is the file I downloaded is 3802.MOV, is th

  • Camera RAW beta 5.6 Bridge previews gone, can't uninstall

    I updated to the 5.6 beta to work with some 7D files, and now get no previews in Bridge.  I've purged the cache, no good.  I also lost my Smart Collections, a major PIA.  I wanted to uninstall, but can't, and can't find any info. Anybody?

  • Procedure after Automatic Payment it run.

    Dear all, Please suggest what is the procedure after automatic payment is run. what is mostly done. Thanks Nishan

  • ItemDetails WD Java - External Validation

    Hi, Has anyone used WD JAVA External Validation with Taxonomy table? Everything is ok with plain tables, but when I assign WdCompsUserExits to ItemDetails Component connected with taxonomy table, I have an error: "Illegal field [Parent] found in XSD