QTime - Nulware Conflict

After receiving a 4Gb Nano for Xmas and installing iTunes and Quicktime, successfully, and being able to synchronise the Nano, etc, I get the following dialogue box in XP, on boot-up of the PC;
'16-Bit MS-DOS Subsystem
C:\WINDOWS\System32\Nulware
The NTVDM CPU has encountered an illegal instruction.
CS:0548 IP:fff7 OP:ff fa ff ff 01 Choose 'Close' to terminate the application.
Close Ignore'
It appears to be Quicktime that is causing the issue, as if that is uninstalled, things go back to normal, but Nano requires Quicktime to work / sunchroNise with the PC, so it's not a long term solution. Thanks.
Do you have any idea how to fix this?

Hi Sue,
I first tried it at work and when it did not play I updated to 7.1.3 with no joy.
I don't know which versions others have, I only know that the other movie clips at my site are OK. Examples.
The broken one for PC's:
http://homepage.mac.com/joeuu/iMovieTheater34.html
A good one for PC's:
http://homepage.mac.com/joeuu/iMovieTheater24.html
Thanks again.
Joe

Similar Messages

Crystal Report 2008 SP3 and BO XI 3.1 conflict

Hi every body,
We have a BOE system:
BO XI 3.1
Oracle db 10g
All running successful and can create some types of WebI report.
But we also want reports with Crystal Report.
1> So we install Crystal Report 2008 SP3 (without knowing the conflict error between BO XI 3.1 and Crystal Report 2008 SP3 and overwrite some .dll file). After installing, we can not create WebI report any more. And a error message box display: "DBDriver failed to load: C:\Program File\Business Objects\BusinessObjects ENterprise12.0\win32_x86\dataAccess\connectionServer\dbd_oci.dll ".
2> We uninstall Crystal Report SP3. But this is not the solution. Still error because of missing .dll files.
3> We open BO XI 3.1 setup and repair BO XI 3.1. Even we uninstall BO XI 3.1, delete all of its components and delete in regedit key. We install BO XI 3.1 again. Now we have full .dll file, not missing them any more. But when we open universe and click on Table browser, cannot fetching any tables.
We set rights for Oracle DB user again. But still error: cannot fetching.
4> We searched the solution for this problem on the internet. But not worked, no answer.
Can somebody help me bring back the BOE system state again ? pls :"<
T______T

Hi Paul,
I hope I read your question right!
Yes, It is possible to run XIR2 and 3.1 on the same server although it's not recommended by BO. You will need to make sure they are both pointing to different CMS databases and different FRS repositories, like you already mentioned you will need to specify different ports for the CMS db and Tomcat.
Why not uninstall Business Objects XI R2 in your BO development environment or a spare server (if you have one), and do a clean install of XI 3.1 SP3.
Tip: If you were already having performance issues with your XI R2 environment, I would seriously consider upgrading the hardware. XI 3.1 needs a bit more RAM and CPU than XI R2
Regards
Rim Geurts

OIM 9.1.0.2 - User group permission conflict issue

Hi Gurus,
IHAC who have faced a strange behavior about permission conflict.
User has been assigned to a user group (ANALISTA DRSI) who have permission to disable resource of the users he administrates. The user group has been assigned to resource's administrator.
The same use has been assigned to other user group (ANALISTA ADM DRSI) who have other permission. The user group has been not assigned to resource's administrator.
If the user has been only assigned to ANALISTA DRSI user group the user is able to see records on Rogue Account report. If the customer has been assigned to both ANALISTA DRSI and ANALISTA ADM the user is not able to see the record on Rogue Account report. He got a display error message (You do not have permission). Both user groups have the Report menu item assigned.
My question: if the customer is assigned to a user group who have permission to see the reports, should not the user is able to see the report even though he is also into the other group who do not have permission?
Is there conflit in the OIM???
Any tip will be very appreciated.

Orgnaization > Manage > Select Org in which users are getting created > Administrative Group (Drop Down) > Select Group for which users are not coming.

I have a macbook 4.1 with osx10.6.8 and just added memory (2gig) so I could sync my new Ipome and Ipad. and Ipad. Now I'm told I need to upgrade my operating system. The apple store gave me conflicting instructions. Any suggestions? Thanks

I have a macbook 4.1 with osx10.6.8 and just added memory (2gig) so I could sync my new IPhone and Ipad. Now I'm told at the apple store that I need to upgrade my operationg system. They said they couldn't help and gave me conflicting advice about what to do. Any ideas? Thanks you!

There are three models of MacBook that comprise the 'macbook 4.1' category, and each of them a little different; however other than 'macbook 4.1' the other thing they have in common is they all are considered Early 2008. Two are white, one black, polycarbonate case, Core2Duo 2.1GHz, 2.4GHz white, 2.4GHz black.
So if you can determine which one, if any of these, is the model build year and spec you have, that would be handy. Did you tell whoever you spoke to the serial number of your computer, so they'd know by looking up the specs to see what the supported maximum RAM upgrade capacity was, and other minimum requirements to make any upgrade to Mac OS X 10.6.8 at all?
If you have the serial number you can do a lookup to 'indentify by serial number' online, and use that information to determine if the computer needs even more RAM to take it past the minimum for Snow Leopard 10.6.8 and then get it ready to upgrade (via paid download from App Store, Snow Leopard gets you that far) and see what the next supported OS X full upgrade would be for the hardware limitations on that old MacBook.
If your MacBook IS a 4.1 build, the highest OS X it could run if it has the 2.4GHz cpu, is Lion 10.7.5. That would be an upgrade from the App store, available to OS X 10.6.8+ computers that access it online. And I kind of doubt how supported a newest iphone etc may be in lion.
everymac.com has a fair amount of information across many years of Apple computing hardware...
Here's the three MacBooks that share the 4.1 designation; first shipped with as much as 1GB RAM upgrade and the other two only a 2GB RAM*, (one white/one black color) according to this information...
• MacBook "Core 2 Duo" 2.1 13" (White-08) 2.1 GHz Core 2 Duo (T8100)
• MacBook "Core 2 Duo" 2.4 13" (White-08) 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo (T8300)
• MacBook "Core 2 Duo" 2.4 13" (Black-08) 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo (T8300)
...as seen here: http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook/index-macbook.html
*But according to MacTracker (free: download database) http://mactracker.ca
these MacBooks can use more RAM in aftermarket specs as much as:
Maximum Memory
6.0 GB (Actual) 4.0 GB (Apple)
Memory Slots
2 - 200-pin PC2-5300 (667MHz) DDR2 SO-DIMM
To get more information use a service such as this...
•identify by serial number:
http://www.powerbookmedic.com/identify-mac-serial.php
The Apple? store or whoever you talked, to may have been as accurate as they could be without further research. Could be you may have a newer or older MacBook, which would change whatever later OS X it could run past 10.6.8. And to go past Snow Leopard, you need to download the last bits for 10.6.x to be able to go and get any later upgrade. The ones that may let a newest iphone or ipad work with it, are past SL10.6.8
Anyway, as you further verify the model build year and configuration specifications, report back.
Good luck & happy computing!

CTE : ERRO MONITOR ( Type conflict in program /XNFE/SAPLGROUPING )

Ola Sap Experts, preciso de uma mão de vcs.
Estou em um ambiente de um cliente onde o monitor de outbound de CTe, quando se tenta acessar o detalhe da CTe ou qualquer outra ação é gerado o erro "Type conflict in program /XNFE/SAPLGROUPING. (termination; RABAX_STATE)" é gerado um dump na ST22.
O cliente nao tem qualquer customizacao desse monitor usa de maneira standart e se encontra no sp 16 do SLL-NFe rodando em base de um PI 7.31 dual stack.
Alguem já passou ou esta passando por isso ?

Prezados,
Alguém conseguiu resolver o DUMP?
Estamos enfrentando o mesmo problema no projeto, mas o erro só ocorre quando testamos um cenário com IPI Return.
Alguma dica?
Obrigada,
Tatiana Augusto

Can I Suppress Conflicting Names Messages in the TestStand Deployment Log?

I have a deployment that is being built via a command line calling the deployment utility. It is all being done with a script. I then use the deployment log for information to e-mail to myself and others about the build. I am getting conflicting name messages for VIs in the Labview Reports library that is shipped from NI. There are a lot of message about VIs being renamed because of this. Is there a way of suppressing these messages so real information can be observed and not missed because of all this spam? I don't want to have a real problem over looked because of these messages being generated about items that are not in my control. Thanks in advance for any help.
Troy

What version of TestStand, and LabVIEW are you using? Have you seen How to Successfully Deploy a TestStand System with LabVIEW 8.6 and Report Generation Toolkit ?
Richard S -- National Instruments --Applications Engineer -- Data Acquisition with TestStand

K7N2 DELTA ILSR has conflicted with ram....

K7N2 DELTA ILSR has conflicted with this ram....
http://www.kingmax.com/product/pro_superMPXB62D-383.htm
I got 2 * 256MB DDR 400 of the above ram.
Is there any conflicted with K7N2 DELTA??
amd 2500+
thank you
BIOS version 7.4

Quote
Originally posted by utada
I have already brought kingmax
These boards are very picky with RAM. As Bonz has pointed out their is an approved list near the top of the Forum but unfortunately I don't beleive Kingmax is on it. Sometimes the generic RAMS run, sometimes not. It seems to be hit or miss. If you want a recommendation of good quality RAM I would suggest MUSHKIN first and CORSAIR second. Good Luck
Rob

Hot Synch Manager Settings (Conflict Resolution)

Hello,
I synch an office desktop and a home desktop with one Palm Z22. I have had a lot of problems with duplicate appointments ! How should I configure the Hot Sync Manager settings? I have the conduits (calendar, note pad, etc. ) set on "synchonize the files". But when I click on "change" and then "settings", I'm brought to the option of "Conflict Resolution" and the choices are duplicate, Outlook wins, Handheld wins, or ignore. Which should I choose if I want to avoid duplicate appointments ?
Thank you.
Nancy
Post relates to: Zire
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Yes, that's what I'd set it to. You want the information to flow in only one direction on the slave computer. Handheld --> computer.
WyreNut
Post relates to: Centro (AT&T)
I am a Volunteer here, not employed by HP.
You too can become an HP Expert! Details HERE!
If my post has helped you, click the Kudos Thumbs up!
If it solved your issue, Click the "Accept as Solution" button so others can benefit from the question you asked!

Conflict resolution including the CRT DUMMYfor Add-On ST-SER rel.700_2007_1

Dear all,
Environment #    32 bit win2k3, SAP   & Orc with 10.2.0.2.0
We are in process of applying suport packs for Solution manager 7.0, SAPKITL25 is finished
When applying SAPKITL26 with SAPKB70015, SAPKA70015 I am gettign the following CRT is required
ST-SER rel.700_2007_1 .
I did this add-on & applied support packs for this component ST-SER rel.700_2007_1 - 1,2
& tried SAPKITL26 with SAPKB70015, SAPKA70015 again but the error repeats . What is the last support pack in 32 BIT sap system fo Solution manager.
Error -
Phase ADDON_CONFLICTS_?: Explanation of Errors
onflicts were found between the Support Packages that you want to
mport and the Add-Ons installed in the system. To guarantee the
onsistency of your system, the import is interrupted until all Conflict
esolution Transports (CRTs) for the listed Support Packages are
ncluded in the queue.
o include the CRTs in the queue, proceed as follows:
Write down the Support Packages and Add-Ons that have conflicts.
Leave this screen by choosing 'Cancel' (F12).
Load the CRTs for the Support Packages with conflicts from the SAP
Service Marketplace or request them from your Add-On supplier.
Define the extended queue again in the Support Package Manager.
Import the queue. The Support Package Manager executes all steps from
the beginning.
f the problem involves an SAP Add-On, see SAP Note 53902, which tells
ou which CRTs resolve the conflicts. Otherwise contact the supplier of
our Add-On for details on how to proceed.
he following contains a table of Support Packages for each Add-On for
hich conflicts were detected. The column 'Information on the Conflict
esolution' specifies how you can resolve a conflict. For more
nformation, select the corresponding 'Information for the Conflict
esolution'.
onflicts Between Add-On ST-SER 700_2007_1 and Support Packages
omponent    Release      Support Package        Information on
                                                Conflict Resolution
T           400          SAPKITL426             CRT: DUMMY
Is this a known error or how to overcome this & clues on the following..
-Rahul

Dear Sunny,
I went through the sap notes & found that i need to download ST-SER 700_2008_1.
SAP Solution Manager 7.0 (Software component ST 400)
ST 400 SP16 (SAPKITL426)
With SP16 (SAPKITL426) SAP strictly recommends to upgrade your ST-SER tothe release 700_2008_1 or higher. Therefore use transaction SAINT instead of transaction SPAM to patch your system to SAP Solution Manager 7.0. If you try to patch your system via SPAM and your ST-SER release is 700_2007_1 or less you will receive one of the following information within SPAM during phase ADDON_CONFLICTS_?:
                    a) Conflicts Between Add-On ST-SER 700_2005_2 and Support Packages SAPKITL426 Include CRT
                    b) Conflicts Between Add-On ST-SER 700_2006_1 and Support Packages SAPKITL426 Include CRT
                    c) Conflicts Between Add-On ST-SER 700_2006_2 and Support Packages SAPKITL426 Include CRT
                    c) Conflicts Between Add-On ST-SER 700_2007_1 and Support Packages SAPKITL426 Include CRT
                    *Please be aware there is no physical Conflict Resolution Transport (CRT) available to solve this conflict (it is not planned to provide such a CRT). You have to patch your system via SAINT not via SPAM:*
                    1. Delete your SPAM-QUEUE by pressing the Display/Define button within SPAM.
                    2. Download all ST-SER Delta-Upgrade packages from the Software Download Center into your EPS-Inbox.
                    3. Call transaction SAINT and press Start button.
                    4. Select ST-SER 700_2008_1 or higher and press Continue button
                    All neccessary component packages will automatically be included into a valid SAINT-queue
but ST-SER 700_2008_1 not available to download & also noticed there are no manual CRT's
how should i manage to patch system with ST-SER 700_2008_1 when it is not availble to download
Thanks & regards,
rahul

Conflict: READ TABLE itab2 INDEX 1 vs Modify itab1 from index sy-tabix

The below simple code is for each itab1 line, create a new itab2 by using select statement, and then grab the max value of field f in itab2 and fill it into a corresponding field in itab1.
However the statement:
READ TABLE itab2 into gs_itab1 INDEX 1.
causes the conflict with our another statement in the end of itab1 loop:
Modify itab1 from gs_itab1 index sy-tabix.
that the below Modify statement always modify itab1 at 1st row and also causes an unlimited loop that the program is hung up. Our code looks as the following:
Loop AT itab1 into gs_itab1.
         use Select statement to fill in itab2...
         SORT itab2 BY f DESCENDING. "f is a field of itab2
         READ TABLE itab2 into gs_itab1 INDEX 1.
         Modify itab1 from gs_itab1 index sy-tabix.
EndLoop.
However the last two lines of statements in the itab1 loop causes the program hang!
Any solution?
Thanks in advance!

Hi,
I got confused while going thru the code...
according to code
first u loop itab1 and get tht in gs_itab1 and then a select query to get data from some table and store in itab2.
Here are u using any where condition, if yes u may probably check aganst gs_itab1 rite? if yes
first suggestion...why cant u put the select statement above the loop and get all the values to an internal table and then read the internal table in the loop stmt. Yes i can see u r sorting it based on some 'f'..just a suggestion
Now here can u follow this code...
Loop AT itab1 ASSIGNING <fs_itab1>,
         use Select statement to fill in itab2...
         SORT itab2 BY f DESCENDING. "f is a field of itab2
         READ TABLE itab2 into <fs_itab1> index 1.
EndLoop.
Please let me know if its not ok
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Regards,
ABAPer007
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Apr 11, 2008 12:26 PM

Unable to create web app with PowerShell - An update conflict has occurred

I am trying to create a new Web Application using PowerShell. I need to use PowerShell because I need to create the Web App using classic authentication and not Claims authentication. the first time I created the Web App, everything went great. Ever since
the first time, I get an error and the web app creation does not complete. Just as an FYI, I can create a new Web App using Central Admin, but that creates it with Claims authentication which I cannot use.
Here is my PowerShell script
New-SPWebApplication -Name "SharePoint2013 (82)" -ApplicationPool "SharePoint2013-82" -AuthenticationMethod "NTLM" -ApplicationPoolAccount (Get-SPManagedAccount "GLOBAL\SP_AppPool") -Port 82 -URL "http://sharepoint2013"
Here is the error I get in PowerShell
New-SPWebApplication : An update conflict has occurred, and you must re-try this action. The object SPWebApplication
Name=SharePoint2013 (82) was updated by DOMAIN\SP_Administrator, in the powershell (13020) process, on machine SPWEB01.
View the tracing log for more information about the conflict.
At line:1 char:1
+ New-SPWebApplication -Name "SharePoint2013 (82)" -ApplicationPool "SharePoint201 ...
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidData: (Microsoft.Share...PWebApplication:SPCmdletNewSPWebApplication) [New-SPWebA
pplication], SPUpdatedConcurrencyException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : Microsoft.SharePoint.PowerShell.SPCmdletNewSPWebApplicationUnknown SQL Exception 547 occurred. Additional error information from SQL Server is included below.
The DELETE statement conflicted with the REFERENCE constraint "FK_Dependencies1_Objects". The conflict occurred in database "SP_Config", table "dbo.Dependencies", column 'ObjectId'.
The statement has been terminated.
I also get this error from the trace
Unknown SQL Exception 547 occurred. Additional error information from SQL Server is included below.
The DELETE statement conflicted with the REFERENCE constraint "FK_Dependencies1_Objects". The conflict occurred in database "SP_Config", table "dbo.Dependencies", column 'ObjectId'.
The statement has been terminated.
I have tried to resolve the issue by performing the following:
Delete the partially created web app using Central Admin or PowerShell
Clear the file system cache on all servers in the farm (Stopping wss timer job, Saving Copy of the
cache.ini file from C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\application data\Microsoft\SharePoint\Config folder. Clearing all the .xml files from the location except cache.ini but Edit the cache.ini to have value 1. Starting the timer job)
Use Products Configuration Wizard (no detach, just 'upgrade') - People have said to select the option to disconnect the server from server farm and revert back again at next step (so you actually do not disconnect), but there is no next step that I have
encountered. You select 'disconnect', hit next, and the server disconnects.
Restart all the servers in the farm
Run the PowerShell script again...still get the same error
I have tried it on multiple servers in the farm too.

Hi Michael,
I found a similar thread for you reference:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/9ccef7bf-87a9-4849-b086-4db2d898f1d7/cannot-create-new-web-application-wss-30?forum=sharepointadminlegacy
If it doesn’t work, sometimes the issue might be caused by long time keep powershell opening and generating some cache files. So please try re-opening the powershell and test the issue again.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ronalg/archive/2011/06/24/mount-spcontentdatabase-errors-on-2nd-and-subsequent-attempts-of-same-database.aspx?Redirected=true
http://www.oakwoodinsights.com/sharepoint-powershell-surprise/
In addition, here is an article which explains the possible reason of the SQL error:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee513056(v=office.14).aspx
Regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected] .
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Conflict between Adobe Acrobat and Adobe Reader and how I fixed it

For the past 5 years, I have owned Adobe Acrobat version 9, and recently installed Adobe Reader as well (version 10.7). I was previously able to set up Firefox to use Acrobat to display PDF files in the browser without downloading them, but I recently noticed that this was no longer the case. Instead, every PDF file I tried to view was being downloaded instead. I came here to find a solution, and discovered that many other people are having similar problems. I followed the instructions given here (https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/view-pdf-files-firefox-without-downloading-them), but found that they were actually UNhelpful. They tell you to turn off the Firefox PDF viewer by editing about:config to disable the file pdfs.js, which is the native Firefox PDF viewer-- but that will cause the PDF file type to disappear from the Tools/Options dialog, so you can't assign it to another program (whether Adobe or anything else). This makes it impossible to assign the Adobe plugin to open PDF files. I did figure out a solution on my own, and wanted to post it here to help other users with the same problem.
I ultimately learned, through trial and error and a lot of research both here and on Adobe's website, that the root cause of my problem was a conflict in Firefox between Acrobat and Reader. I was able to solve it by upgrading Acrobat, getting rid of Reader and enabling the Firefox PDF viewer so that I could assign the PDF file type to the Acrobat plugin within Firefox. Here are the details of my problem and how I solved it:
1. Acrobat and Reader conflict with each other in Firefox, but this isn't totally Firefox's fault. It's mostly Adobe's fault, and they pretty much admit it. Specifically, they say that Acrobat and Reader can't coexist on the same machine unless both are version 10 or higher. They tell you to upgrade to solve the problem--but I can't afford to pay for a new version of Acrobat. If you have to keep Acrobat 9.x, Adobe says the lowest version of Reader that will work with it is Reader 11. I couldn't upgrade to this because I have Vista, and Adobe hasn't issued Reader 11 for Vista (and doesn't plan to). I did cheat and download the Win 7 version of Reader 11, but it didn't help.
2. If you have both Acrobat and Reader, you can choose a setting in Reader to make it the default PDF handler--but Firefox ignores this information and defaults to Acrobat no matter what. (This is the part we can blame Firefox for.) If you have a version of Acrobat which is below 9.5.5, Firefox actually blocks it as a security risk, so the plugin won't work at all, regardless of version number. That's why PDFs are being downloaded through your standalone program instead of being displayed in the browser. If you want to view PDFs in Firefox and keep Acrobat on your computer, you MUST upgrade Acrobat to version 9.5.5 or above.
3. Unless you can upgrade Acrobat to at least 10.x, GET RID OF READER. As long as you can access Acrobat 9.5.5, it will work fine in Firefox and there's no need for Reader. I never used to have Reader myself, only Acrobat, but it must have been downloaded automatically when Acrobat was blocked by Firefox (which I didn't even realize).
4. IF YOU NEED TO UPGRADE ACROBAT 9.X TO 9.5.5, YOUR LAST CHANCE IS TODAY--6/26/13. Adobe has announced that today is the "end of life" for the Acrobat 9.x platform, and all support and upgrades will cease after today.
When I searched for updates by going to Adobe's website, it told me there were none available--but when I checked for them FROM THE ACROBAT PROGRAM ITSELF (Help/Check for updates), I was offered a 300 MB upgrade that took me all the way from version 9.0 to 9.5.5 in one step. (It did take a very long time to download and install.)
5. Once you have Acrobat 9.5.5, this is how to enable it in Firefox:
a. INSIDE ACROBAT, set your preference for "Internet" to "view PDF files in browser." Close Acrobat. Close Firefox if it's already open.
b. Reopen Firefox. Check Tools/Add-Ons/Plugins to make sure the Acrobat plugin is there. Enable it if disabled. Close Firefox.
If the plugin isn't there at all, repair your Acrobat installation through Control Panel. Then return to Firefox and enable it. Close Firefox.
c. Reopen Firefox again. Go to Tools/Options and check the list of file types. For the names that contain "Adobe" and "Acrobat," Acrobat should be set as the default program to open them. Select it from the drop-down list if it's not. Continue to scroll through the alphabetical list--you should see another entry called Portable Document Format. If it's there, the default will be "preview in Firefox." You should be able to change this to "Acrobat (in Firefox)" using the drop-down menu. Do NOT pick the option that says "Acrobat"--this is the standalone program and will cause your PDFs to be downloaded.
If you don't see "Acrobat (in Firefox)" as an option, this means your plugin is not working. Go back and fix it using the instructions above (including repair of Acrobat if necessary).
d. If you don't see a file type for "Portable Document Format" at all, that means the Firefox PDF viewer is disabled. You must enable it by editing the about:config file. To see it, type about:config in the Firefox address bar. You will get a warning message--just click OK and keep going.
This file is a long list of statements in alphabetical order. LOOK FOR A STATEMENT THAT SAYS "pdfjs.disabled" with a Boolean value of "true." Select this statement and right-click. A context menu will offer you choices including "Toggle." Select that one, which will change the Boolean value to "false." Exit about:config. Close Firefox.
e. Now return to Tools/Options, scroll through the list of file types, and you should see "Portable Document Format." Select "Acrobat (in Firefox)" as in the instructions above. Close Firefox.
f. The first time you try to open a PDF file in Firefox, you may get a dialog box which offers you choices of how to open the file. The first will be Acrobat, but DON'T CHOOSE THAT--it will cause your PDF to download. Instead, go to the choice that says "Open as application/pdf." You don't need to change the program that opens this file type, because your settings are already correct. Your PDF should open in the browser, with the full-featured Acrobat menu (including the option of editing or saving the file).
I hope other users can benefit from the truly painful experience I had figuring all of this out. Good luck.

Since it doesn't seem like you are looking for support, locking this thread.

Dropbox syncing conflicts iwork 2013?

Hello all,
I have been using dropbox to sync and share files with others for years. But recently since I updated to iwork 2013 from 09 version, I started to experience a repeated problem, which is very annoying. While I am working on a pages(or numbers) file saved in dropbox folder for a while, a warning window will pop up saying that, another program is using this file, and ask me if I want to "save anyway" or "revert". I first thought maybe it was a problem caused by sharing features, because the file may be in syncing on other people's computers, who are shared with this file. But then I found that, a file saved in my private dropbox folder will give the same warning too when I work on them. So I think it is a syncing conflict somehow caused by dropbox syncing and iwork apps.
This is a really annoying. Because everytime it broke the train of thoughts and I scratched my head to figure out how to make it go away with no success. If anybody could help me, it will be very much appreciated. Thanks.

Apple has removed over 90 features from Pages 5 and added a lot of bugs.
http://www.freeforum101.com/iworktipsntrick/viewforum.php?f=22&sid=3527487677f0c 6fa05b6297cd00f8eb9&mforum=iworktipsntrick
I wouldn't hold my breathe waiting for Apple to fix anything. It has only said it will do a very short list of fixes in the next 6 months and nothing else beyond that.
Pages '09 should still be in your Applications/iWork folder.
Archive/trash Pages 5 and rate/review it in the App Store, then get back to work.
Peter

Single Click to Download File - Auto Rename if Conflicting File Exists in Downloads Folder

I am trying to migrate from Safari. However, one of THE most important features that I simply can't do without, is the one click "Download Linked File" right click contextual menu item. This together with the auto-rename file action if a name conflict exists within the downloads folder, to which you are saving the file.
Is there a way to do this in FF? All I can locate is"Save Link As" and then you have to either click to save or manually rename the file if there is a conflict. This is a real pain - I am happy to allow duplicate filenames for certain files.
Hopefully someone can point me in the right direction - needs to be an absolute one click solution from contextual menu via an add on or something.
Thanks

As I recall, DownThemAll is able to do this. You first have to configure it to rename files when a file with the same name already exists. Then you should be able to use the context menu option labeled “DTA OneClick!” or some such.
* https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/downthemall/

Flash Player 10 does not work in IE or Firefox. What could it conflict with?

I'm using Firefox 3.6.8 (and sometimes IE 8.0.6001.18702IC) on Windows XP Pro, SP 3.
For some weeks now, I have been unable to hear any sounds on anything Flash-based, from YouTube to games at MSN.com or embedded videos on any site using Flash. Initially I had assumed it to be because of having QuickTime installed because I know QT likes to hijack everything. I uninstalled QT (and Real Player) and Flash Player then reinstalled Flash Player (and Shockwave Player just in case) and guess what?
Yup. Nothing. When I uninstalled everything, I used a program called Revo Uninstaller, which includes a registry cleaning option. I then used Abexo and WinASO's registry cleaners to make sure I got everything else that even looked like QuickTime off my hard drive.
When I reinstalled Flash, the following programs appeared in C:\Windows\system 32\Macromed\Flash:
Flash 10i.ocx (10.1.82.76)
FlashUtil10i_ActiveX (10.1.82.76)
FlashUntil10i_Plugin (10.1.82.76)
genuinst (6.0.2800.1531)
FlashUtil10i_ActiveX.dll (10.1.82.76)
NPSWF32.dll (10.1.82.76)
KB931433
FlashInstall
Install
Flashplayer.xpt
When I check IE's "Tools" and look for add-ons, it says that Flash (Shockwave Flash) is enabled. I even enabled the other Adobe add-ons for Acrobat and such just to be sure. Firefox shows Shockwave Flash and Shockwave for Director both to be enabled. The Flash control panel settings don't help: I have all sites set to store about 100 KB on my computer to make sure there's enough room for everything but still nothing.
Before anyone asks, my audio drivers are up to date, thanks to the manufacturer's website. I have DirectX 9.0c installed and everything else works fine. I can play audio and video elsewhere with no problems. It's only Flash that's showing me this trouble and there's no hint as to what else could be interfering with Flash.
Any ideas?

Well, great. I tried the uninstall/reinstall before, but not with the uninstaller, so I was hopeful that this time might do it. No such luck. The video still plays, but no sound.
All the sound settings are working with everything else from games to media players. I set Windows' firewall to allow both the ActiveX and plugin for Flash, just in case.
In the Flash folder, I now have:
Flash10l.ocx (10.1.102.64)
Flash Util10l_ActiveX (10.1.102.64)
FlashUtil10l_Plugin (10.1.102.64)
Genuinst (6.0.2800.1531)
FlashUtil10l_ActiveX.dll (10.1.102.64)
NPSWF32.dll (10.1.102.64)
And the setup and text files that went with 'em.
I've also done a system restart since then and zip.
I went through IE and Firefox and looked for any file associations (like .flv) that I could manually change over to using Flash, but no go. The settings panels for Flash have all been set to allow YouTube specifically (as a test) and to allow 10KB of storage space for all affected sites.
Now what? I'm really not looking forward to a reformat and reinstall, but it's looking like that's what it's going to take.
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:37:07 -0700
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Flash Player 10 does not work in IE or Firefox. What could it conflict with?
Something is strange with your list of modules; you list FlashUntil10i_Plugin (10.1.102.64), but this is really 10.1.85.3
I recommend that you uninstall Flash Player completely (using http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/141/tn_14157.html), then restart Windows, and delete all remaining files in C:\Windows\system32\Macromed\Flash.
Next reinstall both ActiveX (http://fpdownload.adobe.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_ax.exe) and the plugin (http://fpdownload.adobe.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player.exe).
After that, if the problem persists, have a look at this page http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/837/cpsid_83739.html
>

QTime - Nulware Conflict

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for