Quad Core" 2.66 2009/Nehalem (4.1)

Does the Extra SATA port (under the optical drive) offers the same speed as the 4 drive bays for the an SSD drive (System only).
PS: 2009 MP upgrade to 6 Core Xeon W3680 32GB GTX680 5.1EFI
Thanks

RE: PCIe lanes and speeds
All PCIe cards have the first "finger" with 11 lands on each side that provides power and basic control.
x1 cards, like the ones you pictured, have only a small additional "finger" with seven additional pins on each side and stops at pin 18. This provides support for ONE serial data bit -- thus the designation as x1. In PCIe 2.0, this provides 500 MBytes/sec (per lane, but one lane).
A typical single rotating Hard drive can source one busrt of data off the platters (once the data are directly under the Raed/Write head) at no more that about 125MBytes/sec, so x1 is not exactly slow.
The fastest SSD drives available today are running about 800MBytes/sec bursts, so an x1 card WOULD be a bottleneck for those.
x4 cards have a larger second "finger" with 14 additional pins on each side, and stop at pin 32. This provides support for three additional serial data lines for a total of FOUR, thus the designation x4. In PCIe 2.0, this means 4*500 for each of four lanes, so 2,000MBytes/sec.
x8 adds four more data lines in a still larger connector for a total of 8, and speeds up to 8*500 or 4,000MBytes/sec
x16, like you graphics card, add an additional 8 data lines to that for a total of 16 data lines, and speed up to 16*500 or 8,000MBytes/sec.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCIe_2.0#2.0
ThunderBolt-1 provides two independent channels of 10,000Mbits/sec (1250MBytes/sec) each
ThunderBolt-2 provides up to 20,000Mbits/sec (2500MBytes/sec total).
With optical cables, ThunderBolt can be extended to hundreds of feet.

Similar Messages

  • 2009 Mac Pro 2.66 Xeon Quad Core or 2013 Mac Mini 2.66 Quad Core i7 ?

    2009 Mac Pro 2.66 Xeon Quad Core or 2013 Mac Mini Server 2.66 Quad Core i7 ? I have a choice between these two for running Final Cut Pro X. Price is nearly the same.
    The Mac Pro has a ePCI 512 display adapter, 16 GB RAM, more hard drive expansion and faster 1tb 7200 rpm conventional hard drive. FW 800.
    The Mini Server has two 1 tb 5400 rpm conventional drives, 16 GB RAM and an integrated display adapter. Has thunderbolt and FW 800.
    My primary concern is the performance of the processors. Does anyone happen to know how they compare in video editing?

    This may give you some ideas.
    There are some folks on this forum who report very saticfactory results editing on Minis.
    Perhaps they will chime in with first hand experience (which I can't give).
    Russ

  • My new iMac 27 i7 quad core (early 2011) is slower than the iMac 21 core duo  3,06 ghz (late 2009).

    hello i've just bouth my new imac 27" ( spring 2011) with  quad core i7 3,4ghz  4gb ram and 2gb ati radeon graphics..
    I've proceded with the migration assistent and just copied my old configurations, programs and datas from the old one ( imac late 2009 27" 8gb ram intel core duo 3,06 ghz, 256mb ati radeon graphics) to the new one...now they are twins with boot lion 10,7,2..what i've just discovered? that the old one is a litttle faster than the new one.
    photoshop is opening faster
    and more or less all the adobe suite..
    is that a joke? how is that possible? i can think that the  issue is all about the RAM (4gb new imac, 8gb old imac)..
    could someone help me please?
    thankyou.
    Andre

    As far as I am aware iMacs do not have upgradeable CPUs.

  • Will It Work on Leopard: iMac Late 2009 with Quad Core i7, 8GB and 4850 Mobility GPU

    Hi. I'm doing an experiment if the garbled screen (unreadable but the OS and files are not being corrupted at all) I'm experiencing since I upgraded to Lion (up to Yosemite) is a software bug (specifically when it's running it's 3D drivers) or a hardware bug (possibly the GPU is failing). I would rule it as a hardware, that the iMac's GPU is failing but when I used Ubuntu 14.04 Live CD which does not use any of the 3D drivers (it doesn't use OpenGL) for its 3D acceleration, it's perfect there which is why I feel it may be a software bug- no problems with 3D acceleration.
    If Leopard would work on the late 2009 iMac with i7 quad core, that'd be great.
    Thank you in advance.
    God bless, Rev. 21:4

    The only issue I have found is that the there are no additonal display resolution settings to adjust.
    So the iMac is stuck with its native resolution in OS X 10.5.8 Leopard (I hate the iMac's 2550 x 1900 resolution. Everything is just too small for my 50 year old eyes.)
    You can adjust the size of icons and icon text size in the Finder Prefs and View Options, you can adjust the Dock size, but that is pretty much it.
    No way to adjust the size of the text in the top main menu bar or make the text in the title bar on Finder windows larger, either.
    But everything else works.
    I can access all of my other external drives, most of the applications, that are mostly updated to work just with OS X 10.5.8 Leopard, launch and work fine. My Wacom Intuous3 tablet seems to work fine add I can adjust the preferences and controls of all of by pens and airbrush tool.
    My older IR Microsoft and Logitech mice work fine.
    I can't believe how much faster OS X 10.5.8 runs on this iMac.
    If I hadn't updated all of my Apple apps on OS X 10.6.8 Snow Leopard and all my updated iTunes, iPhoto and Aperture Libraries, long ago, needed more up to date web browsers (TenFourFox wasn't available back in 2011) and Mail clients, more up to date Flash and security updates, I might have just stayed using OS X 10.5 Leopard on this iMac.
    It is quite a bit faster than Snow Leopard. Even that much faster considering I am  running OS X 10.5.8 from my external FW800 drive.

  • Will It Work on Tiger: iMac Late 2009 with Quad Core i7, 8GB and 4850 Mobility GPU

    Hi. I'm doing an experiment if the garbled screen (unreadable but the OS and files are not being corrupted at all) I'm experiencing since I upgraded to Lion (up to Yosemite) is a software bug (specifically when it's running it's 3D drivers) or a hardware bug (possibly the GPU is failing). I would rule it as a hardware, that the iMac's GPU is failing but when I used Ubuntu 14.04 Live CD which does not use any of the 3D drivers (it doesn't use OpenGL) for its 3D acceleration, it's perfect there which is why I feel it may be a software bug- no problems with 3D acceleration.
    If Tiger would work on the late 2009 iMac with i7 quad core, that'd be great.
    Thank you in advance.
    God bless, Rev. 21:4

    Tiger won't work.
    Install OSX Restrictions

  • 2008 Quad Core to 2012/Nehalem MacPro Upgrade

    I'm upgrading to a 2012/Nehalem MacPro from a 2008 Quad Core. Can I just install all my 2008 drives in the 2012 and power up?

    Tx Grant. Found out about the sleds when I first tried swapping the drives, but I remounted them and everything is hunky dory. New 'puter booted just fine.

  • I5 or quad core processsor on mac book pro 13inch screen 2009

    hi i was wondering could i upgrade myself from a dual core to either a i5 or a quad core. if so where would i buy it

    hi i was wondering could i upgrade myself from a dual core to either a i5 or a quad core. if so where
    would i buy it
    MBP's cannot have the CPU upgraded. You will need to replace the complete machine if you want to go from a dual core to a quad core.
    Roger

  • New Mac-quad core or 8 core for youth club studio...

    Hi there.
    I have some money to kit out a studio in a youth club. I'm going the Mac route and Logic pro will be one of the programs we run. Once ive spent the cash thats it, so I'm hoping to go as powerful as possible.
    I am looking at the new Nehalem quad core and 8 core models. At first I was going to opt for the 8 core (this may seem like overkill for a youth club, but I have worked with them for some years and we finally have a chance to get some really tasty kit!), but then I read the following article that suggested on paper that the 2.66ghz quad core is actually faster than the 2.26ghz 8 core;
    http://www.macworld.com/article/139507/2009/03/macpro2009.html
    I have been trying to find out if Logic Pro is a program that can make use of the extra cores. I am guessing not, but have not been able to find confirmation on this.
    Question is, for longevity and a super fast machine, what would you recommend. I could get a slightly faster quad core than the base unit, but I am guessing in the future to go up to 8 core, you would need a completely new machine pretty much rather than upgradeing. I have mostly been a PC user, so these top end macs are a bit new to me.
    Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated
    Many thanks
    Smoulders

    I disagree that Logic fully uses all 8 cores (16 including the hyperthreading cores). Logic seems to max out at 8 threads, and it is able to take advantage of hyperthread cores. The result of this is that while it uses 8 cores on an octo machine, it also uses 8 cores on a quad machine (4 cores plus 4 HT cores), and the difference between the two is considerably less than it should be.
    Hopefully soon there will be a version of Logic that uses 16 threads and takes advantage of HT on the octo machines, but in the meantime, much of the available CPU power is going unused. An octo can max out at 1600% cpu use, but logic is lucky to make it to 400%. It can reach that same level on a quad core i7. Same goes for Logic benchmarks, the difference in actual processing power isn't much, especially if the quad is at a higher clock speed.
    Anyone who has an 8 core machine can test this, there's a Processor control panel that lets you disable cores (or hyperthreading). If you disable four cores, it will just use the hyperthreading cores instead with only a minimal loss of CPU power in Logic.

  • I cant figure out what is slowing down my mbp i7 quad core. Help?!

    This is a used machine I bought off CL. Upgraded to 10.8.3 and upgraded RAM to 8 gb. Has been wrking great. Suddenly delay between input and output. I click wait then it responds.....like a pc.....same with typing or any other comand and constant pinwheeling. closed all applications cleaned all temp caches. Used onyx to do its magic. All to no avail. My hard drive is at 290 of 500 gb.....my old intell core duo 2009 w 4gb ram is whirring along running all the same software. Its HD is at the same ratio.
    Please help this is a mid 2012 15inch MBP i7 quad core. What could be slowing it down?

    You'll have to backup only user files to a external storage drive (not TimeMachine) and disconnect.
    Then hold command r keys down and reboot the machine, use Disk Uility Erase on the Macintosh HD and move the slider one spot to the right, then click erase, this will Zero Erase the entire partition, takes hours, but let it complete.
    Then quit and reinstall OS X fresh with your AppleID and password/update and install your software, then last add files back, do a scan using the free ClamXav just in case.
    If you still have problems, do a extended Hardware Check, should check the RAM and replace with the original and see if the problem goes away.

  • Should i buy a 2010 mac pro quad core 2.8 never been used at the price of £1350

    i know someone selling a mac pro 2010 model they say its still got 1 year warranty the specs are
    Introduction Date:
    July 27, 2010*
    Discontinued Date:
    N/A
    Details:
    The "Introduction Date" refers to the date a model was introduced via press release. The "Discontinued Date" refers to the date a model either was replaced by a subsequent system or production otherwise ended. *On August 9, 2010, Apple began accepting orders for this model.
    Also see: All Macs introduced in 2010.
    Processors:
    1 (4 Cores)
    Geekbench:
    8673/9715*
    Processor Speed:
    2.8 GHz
    Processor Type:
    Q. Core Xeon W3530
    Custom Speeds:
    3.2 (4), 3.33 GHz (6)*
    Architecture:
    64-Bit
    Details:
    *Via custom configuration, this model also can be equipped with a single 3.2 GHz Quad Core "Nehalem" Xeon (W3565) processor for an additional US$400 or a single 3.33 GHz Six Core "Westmere" Xeon  (W3680) processor for an additional US$1200. As requested by readers, EveryMac.com also has documented these custom configurations as their own models.
    Processor Upgrade:
    LGA 1366 Socket
    FPU:
    Integrated
    Details:
    Also see: How do you upgrade the processors in the "Mid-2010" Mac Pro models? How are the processors mounted?
    System Bus Speed:
    4.8 GT/s*
    Cache Bus Speed:
    2.8 GHz (Built-in)
    ROM/Firmware Type:
    EFI
    EFI Architecture:
    64-Bit
    L1 Cache:
    32k/32k x4
    L2/L3 Cache:
    256k (x4), 8 MB*
    RAM Type:
    PC3-8500 DDR3 ECC
    Min. RAM Speed:
    1066 MHz
    Standard RAM:
    3 GB
    Maximum RAM:
    48 GB*
    Motherboard RAM:
    None
    RAM Slots:
    4*
    Video Card:
    Radeon HD 5770
    VRAM Type:
    GDDR5 SDRAM
    Standard VRAM:
    1 GB
    Maximum VRAM:
    1 GB
    Display Support:
    Up to 6 Displays*
    Resolution Support:
    2560x1600*
    2nd Display Support:
    Dual/Mirroring
    2nd Max. Resolution:
    2560x1600
    Standard Hard Drive:
    1 TB (7200 RPM)
    Int. HD Interface:
    Serial ATA (3 Gb/s)
    Standard Optical:
    18X DL "SuperDrive"
    Standard Disk:
    None
    Standard Modem:
    None
    Standard Ethernet:
    Gigabit (x2)
    Standard AirPort:
    802.11a/b/g/n
    Standard Bluetooth:
    2.1+EDR
    USB Ports:
    5 (2.0)
    Firewire Ports:
    4 (800)
    Expansion Slots:
    4 PCIe 2.0*
    Expansion Bays:
    4 3.5", 2 5.25"
    Incl. Keyboard:
    Apple Aluminum KB
    Incl. Input:
    Magic Mouse
    Case Type:
    Tower
    Form Factor:
    Mac Pro
    Apple Order No:
    MC250LL/A*
    Apple Subfamily:
    Mac Pro Mid-2010
    Apple Model No:
    A1289 (EMC 2314)
    Model ID:
    MacPro5,1
    Battery Type:
    N/A
    Battery Life:
    N/A
    Pre-Installed MacOS:
    X 10.6.4 (10F2521)
    Maximum MacOS:
    Current
    Minimum Windows:
    XP SP2 (32-Bit)*
    Maximum Windows:
    7 (64-Bit)**
    MacOS 9 Support:
    None
    Windows Support:
    Boot/Virtualization
    Dimensions:
    20.1 x 8.1 x 18.7
    Avg. Weight:
    39.9 lbs. (18.1 kg)
    Original Price (US):
    US$2499
    Est. Current Retail:
    US$2499
    they want to sell it for £1300 and this would be my first mac im going to use it for maschine traktor scratch pro 2 and ableton vst s plugins etc i needed to know if this would be a good buy for me or not if u coulld all please help tell me the pros and cons
    if possible answer as quick as u can as if it is a good buy i need to get it today or tommorw as he might find someone else to sell to
    thanks

    You are due for a new build or pre-built, most definitely.
    you should be able to hit score of 14k on 6-core w/o trouble.
    And for what you can get for £1799 - £2099 I think you could build one, but start with quality parts and go with a solid foundation that will be supported for years. As long as you don't need OS X as it stands.
    the mac pro use to shine when it came to dual processor setups. Custom built dual PCs can be another matter, and not for faint of heart.
    Choose current socket support, processor, and motherboard and you really are set for years and can upgrade from there.
    Take a look at this for a start:
    http://www.amazon.com/ASUS-LGA-2011--X79-Motherboards/dp/B006L6ZIU4/

  • Can NOT install Standard ONE on a 2 quad-core processor machine (licensing)

    This is from Oracle's licensing (July 2009):
    ===================================
    “When licensing Oracle programs with Standard Edition One or Standard Edition in the product name, a processor is counted equivalent to a socket. However, in the case of multi-chip modules, each chip in the multi-chip module is counted as one occupied socket.”
    This is also from Oracle's licensing (July 2009):
    =====================================
    “Oracle Database Standard Edition can only be licensed on servers that have a maximum capacity of 4 sockets. Oracle Standard Edition One may only be licensed on servers that have a maximum capacity of 2 sockets.”
    Now, this is what it seems to be:
    ===========================
    1 quad-core AMD/Intel Xeon chip counts as 4x0.5=2 sockets (reached the maximum capacity limit in the licensing terms) by simply using 1 (single) quad-core CPU box.
    and that's it - you can NOT install Standard Edition ONE on a 2 quad-core CPU Linux box :(((((
    For a AMD/Intel multi-core Linux boxes
    ===============================
    it can be a single quad-core CPU box (4x0.5=2 sockets -- but, paying twice the processor license - because it is now 2 sockets) or
    it can be a 2 dual-core CPU (2X2x0.5=2 sockets -- but, paying twice the processor license) or
    it can be a single dual-core CPU box (2x0.5=1 -- paying only a single processor license)
    I think it is time for Oracle to revisit the licensing terms for Standard ONE edition and change it to simple socket count (don't count the cores). It is getting more expensive to use Oracle Standard ONE.

    zaferaktan wrote:
    Everybody should also know - and OPN folks confirmed this morning - that an Oracle Sales person does not have the "legal" authority to overwrite what is written in OLSA. Sales can not rewrite the OLSA. However, Sales can request changes or addendums to the specific contract, which are reviewed by Oracle Legal and approved by Sales senior management (right up to Charles and Larry if needed).
    That said, very few Oracle employees are allowed to discuss any aspect of licensing terms. The official first point of contact is Sales, and they may only be the carrier pigeon of missives from the authority.
    When someone buys Oracle, OLSA is the only legally binding document. Everybody should keep the copy of the OLSA which is in effect at the time of their purchase, given that OLSA can be modified at a later date from the actual purchase.That happens to be true of any license or sales agreement, from Oracle or not. Also note that if you purchase support, renewals may affect the original OLSA.
    And it's one of the reasons old timers in these forums (such as Dan and myself) will prefix nearly any license discussion in the forums with "check with sales" and suffix it with "and anything you hear on the internet is probably useless in a court of law when you get audited".
    and after all that - thanks for digging into the details and posting them.
    (With the warning to any others using the information that the facts need to be reconfirmed for each individual case and date. A judge usually frowns on a defense of "It happened to a friend of a friend of mine" or "I read it on the internet")
    Edited by: Hans Forbrich on Sep 8, 2009 9:43 PM
    By the way - what you write is a change of policy. At one time, a box that could support 4 CPU but only had 2 CPU installed would not qualify for SE1. Good news indeed.

  • 2 Dual core intel xeon vs quad core. Whats the difference??

    I came across someone who's selling his mac pro 1.1 (aprox 2-3 years old machine) which hosts 2 dual core intel xeon processors 2.66 Ghz (4 total cores) with an L2 cache of 4 MB per processor and 3 gb of RAM. He is asking for 1200.00
    I wonder:
    1. is there a significant difference between the machine described above and the new 2.66GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 3500 series processor machines Apple offers?
    2. Is 1200 a good deal considering its a 2-3 year old machine? how much would it cost me brand new?
    3. I am planning to purchase the machine to use Logic Pro 8 (considering to upgrade to 9) which I currently run on my mac book intel core duo 1.8 GHZ. Which of the two machines will be optimal for it?
    Thanks in advance for your time!

    Using the scores on the GeekBench site, I show that a Mac Pro 1,1 2.66GHz gets a score of 4544.
    http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/218641
    The Mac Pro 4,1 Quad Core 2.66GHz with all its Nehalem glory gets a score of 9256.
    http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/229504
    Benchmark tests versus real-world performance, along with your mileage, may vary. But that should give you an idea of what kind of what you're getting.

  • Mac Pro 3.2 GHZ Quad-Core Intel Xeon Running Slow

    Hi everyone!
    I'm a professional photographer and could use some advise, and thanks for your help in advance!
    I have a Mac Pro 3.2 GHZ Quad-Core Intel Xeon with 8 gigs of 1066 MHz DDR3 of memory, running on OS 10.9.5, and my main drive for applications is 1TB and has about 420 GB free. I have various other hard drives for storage.
    I use Chrome, Lightroom 4, Photoshop CC2014, Blogstomp, Spotify or iTunes, and I have Backblaze Backup running continuously.
    When I first got my computer I didn't have any problems, but over the past few months it's been running super slow. I know that LR4 has issues, but I want to make sure that there isn't anything else I need to look into before getting more memory. I mean even Chrome opening up has the beachball.
    Thanks!
    -Deirdre

    etresoft EtreCheck
    The output from that, post it, can be useful.
    More details on the hardware from it too: amount of memory (24-48GB RAM), any changes or upgrades.
    Good tips and advice can be found here, also pro graphics
    Macintosh Performance Guide Articles & Reviews
    My guess is this is a 5,1 2010-2012. You could use a GTX 680 or later, it has good PCIe (the 2009 is somewhat weaker and crippled by sharing slots 3&4)
    A Samsung XP941 512 $525 delivers 1100MB/sec reads and 900MB/sec writes to supercharge your system - one of the best and few such, similar to the same SSD blade used in the nMP 6,1. Lightroom and CS love to be able to load and write scratch, graphic libraries. Bootable. You could use a smaller 256GB $275 for system in slot #3 and one for data and scratch in slot #4 if you wanted to go full out.
    You said it was fine originally so maybe something you installed, or an upgrade to the OS or something else that Etrecheck should help show.

  • Ere are the specs on the Mac I need more power on.  Mac Tower Processor  2 x 2.26 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon Memory  6 GB 1066 MHz DDR3 ECC Graphics  NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 512 MB Serial Number  H00354XF20G Software  OS X 10.8.5 (12F45)  Harddive 640 GB SATA

    ere are the specs on the Mac I need more power on.
    Mac Tower
    Processor  2 x 2.26 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
    Memory  6 GB 1066 MHz DDR3 ECC
    Graphics  NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 512 MB
    Serial Number  H00354XF20G
    Software  OS X 10.8.5 (12F45)
    Harddive 640 GB
    SATA Disk
    (2) Harddrives 1 TB
    SATA Disk
    RAM 6 slots total  -- 6 are filled with 1GB
    (3) UAD Quad cards installed
    I use this computer stictly for audio recording. 
    Pro Tools 10.3.7
    Interface Apollo 16
    Pro Tools is curretnly not compatible with Maverick.   Also, I believe that Pro Tools 10 only allows 4GB ram to be utilized (not sure ) 
    I know Pro Tools 11 allows more, but not sure how much more.  Also not sure if the upgrade to Pro Tools 11 I will have to purchase all new plug ins or if my existing ones will continue to work in it.
    The platform changes from 32 bit to 64 with the upgrade to 11
    If it is as simple as adding more ram, what mode-part #l would you recomeend.  Can the processor be upgraded also ?
    The new tube like Macs are non compatible with UAD Cards.  Those cards a must my sessions

    You can use Activity Monitor to check if apps run as 32 or 64 bit - simply look at the "Kind" column (you may need to select it under View -> Columns) and see if the app in question is listed as "Intel" i.e. 32 bit or as "Intel (64 bit)".
    While in Activity Monitor you can also check if Pro Tools is close to the 3-4 GB limit of a 32 bit app - if you aren't you will probably not benefit from more RAM.
    Your MacPro (it appears to be a Early 2009 model) should have come with a small booklet showing how to install RAM and what kind of RAM that you need. Any RAM that fulfills the requirements should work but your safest choice is probably to buy from a retailer/online store that supports Macs as they will usually know what kind of RAM you need for your mac model.
    Upgrading the CPUs should be possible, but I haven't seen Apple document how to do this, so you will probably have to google around a bit to find instructions and CPU part numbers.
    Your choice of CPUs will also be limited by the motherboard and CPU socket so you may be limited to faster version of your current CPU chip and some slightly newer versions.
    Going from your current CPU to the fastest version included in the 2009 MacPros would be going from 2.26 GHz to 2.93 GHz. This would only give a modest 30% speed boost. Using newer and highly clocked CPUs might boost this somewhat more maybe to 50% ?

  • Can I install Mavericks on Quad-Core Intel Xeon (w/10.6.8)?

    From everywhere I have read so far, the answer looks like "yes I can install Mavericks", but I'm a bit confused and wanted to check with folks here before I dive in...
    I'm running an early-2008 Mac Pro with 10.6.8 (check!), but I could swear that in the past when I tried to update certain pieces of software (and OS), that  10.7+ (or 10.8+) required a later processor than is running on my Mac Pro (which is a Quad-Core Intel Xeon).
    With the Mavericks release, it seems to be that I can now update the OS even with this older processor, and then be able to run all the latest software (I really just use MSFT and Apple software). It seems counter-intuitive to me, so I just wanted to make sure I'm not missing something and will be left in deep doo-doo after trying to install Mavericks!
    Thanks much all-

           Macs that can be upgraded to OS X Mountain Lion
             1. iMac (Mid 2007 or newer) - Model Identifier 7,1 or later
             2. MacBook (Late 2008 Aluminum, or Early 2009 or newer) - Model Identifier 5,1 or later
             3. MacBook Pro (Mid/Late 2007 or newer) - Model Identifier 3,1 or later
             4. MacBook Air (Late 2008 or newer) - Model Identifier 2,1 or later
             5. Mac mini (Early 2009 or newer) - Model Identifier 3,1 or later
             6. Mac Pro (Early 2008 or newer) - Model Identifier 3,1 or later
             7. Xserve (Early 2009) - Model Identifier 3,1 or later
    You must have the third generation MP in order to run Mavericks. You can install over Snow Leopard:
    Repair the Hard Drive and Permissions
    Boot from your Snow Leopard Installer disc. After the installer loads select your language and click on the Continue button. When the menu bar appears select Disk Utility from the Utilities menu. After DU loads select your hard drive entry (mfgr.'s ID and drive size) from the the left side list.  In the DU status area you will see an entry for the S.M.A.R.T. status of the hard drive.  If it does not say "Verified" then the hard drive is failing or failed. (SMART status is not reported on external Firewire or USB drives.) If the drive is "Verified" then select your OS X volume from the list on the left (sub-entry below the drive entry,) click on the First Aid tab, then click on the Repair Disk button. If DU reports any errors that have been fixed, then re-run Repair Disk until no errors are reported. If no errors are reported click on the Repair Permissions button. Wait until the operation completes, then quit DU and return to the installer.
    If DU reports errors it cannot fix, then you will need Disk Warrior and/or Tech Tool Pro to repair the drive. If you don't have either of them or if neither of them can fix the drive, then you will need to reformat the drive and reinstall OS X.
    If all is well then run the Mavericks installer that you downloaded. Prior to this you may wish to make your own installer:
    Make Your Own Mavericks, Mountain/Lion Installer
    1. After downloading the installer you must first save the Install Mac OS X application. After the installer downloads DO NOT click on the Install button. Go to your Applications folder and make a copy of the installer. Move the copy into your Downloads folder. Now you can click on the Install button. You must do this because the installer deletes itself automatically when it finishes installing.
    2. Get a USB flash drive that is at least 8 GBs. Prep this flash drive as follows:
    Open Disk Utility in your Utilities folder.
    After DU loads select your flash drive (this is the entry with the mfgr.'s ID and size) from the leftside list. Click on the Partition tab in the DU main window.
    Under the Volume Scheme heading set the number of partitions from the drop down menu to one. Set the format type to Mac OS Extended (Journaled.) Click on the Options button, set the partition scheme to GUID then click on the OK button. Click on the Partition button and wait until the process has completed.
    Select the volume you just created (this is the sub-entry under the drive entry) from the left side list. Click on the Erase tab in the DU main window.
    Set the format type to Mac OS Extended (Journaled.) Click on the Options button, check the button for Zero Data and click on OK to return to the Erase window.
    Click on the Erase button. The format process can take up to an hour depending upon the flash drive size.
    3. Use Lion DiskMaker 3.0 to put your installer clone onto the USB flash drive.
    Make your own Mavericks flash drive installer using the Mavericks tool:
    You can also create a Mavericks flash drive installer via the Terminal. Mavericks has its own built-in installer maker you use via the Terminal:
    You will need a freshly partitioned and formatted USB flash drive with at least 8GBs. Leave the name of the flash drive at the system default, "Untitled." Do not change this name. Open the Terminal in the Utilities folder. Copy this command line after the prompt in the Terminal's window:
    sudo /Applications/Install\ OS\ X\ Mavericks.app/Contents/Resources/createinstallmedia --volume /Volumes/Untitled --applicationpath /Applications/Install\ OS\ X\ Mavericks.app --nointeraction
    Press RETURN. Enter your admin password when prompted. It will not be echoed to the screen so be careful to enter it correctly. Press RETURN, again.
    Wait for the process to complete which will take quite some time.

Maybe you are looking for

  • New MBP and memory

    It's been 5 yrs since my last laptop, so ready to get the new MBP. One question. 4G memory is quite a hit through Apple, but there are vendors out there ( eg Crucial) that charge about 1/2 that amount. Some time ago, Apple lowered it's price on memor

  • ISE 1.2 notifications

    Dears ,           is there anyway to send notifications about authentication failures to be sent by mail?

  • Employee Master- voluntary termination

    Hello experts, If an employee has decided to leave the company, how do I make his/her record in the Employee Master Data Inactive? So it does not show as part of the Employee List. I do not want to delet it as we want to keep track of the termination

  • Set NDValue when the NDType is user defined class

    Hi Environment: JDeveloper 10.1.3.1.0 Data model: Toplink-POJO User interface ADF-JSF My question: I have to insert in a table that has only two fields that are of type Integer.This fields are forenign keys. I have created in a EJBLocal a method that

  • Asks for USB connection...?

    My apple tv started an update yesterday afternoon... And never finished. Today I tried to reset it using the silver remote, pressing the down and menu button as described. Now the apple tv is showing me a graphic to connect to iTunes via a mini USB c