Quadro2000 does not support ie9 GPU hardware acceleration.

Hi
I’ve tried many time but my w520‘GPU (quardro2000) seemed does not support Internet Explorer 9 GPU hardware acceleration.
The test website is here.
http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Performance/PsychedelicBrowsing/Default.html
Did anybody know how to solve the problem?
Thanks in advance.

dxh8497 wrote:
Yes, I sure that I set BIOS Display as Discrete.
And chrome Firefox supported GPU hardware acceleration, but ie9 didn't.
Well first of all, all three support GPU acceleration on the W520 with the 2000M. So something else is causing problems. I would suggest reviewing the latest BIOS and video driver versions on support.lenovo.com against your machine and updating where needed.
After that, I would run your BIOS with default settings then retest. That will be Optimus mode. I would then change the BIOS Dispplay setting to Discrete with OS auto detect disabled and retest.

Similar Messages

Firefox 4 does not support AVG Safesearch but IE9 does!!! Why?

I decided to install Firefox 4 but it does not support AVG safe search or it's very useful link scanner, so for safer browsing I have reverted back to version 3.6.16.
However Internet explorer 9 from MS supports AVG! I accept that AVG ought to release a new version, but why can Microsoft continue support in their completely re-vamped browser and Mozilla cannot, since all my other add-ons were still compatible?
For reference I am running on Win7 home premium Sp1 64bit, AMD Phenom IIX4 N930 CPU @2.0Ghz , 4GB DDR3 Ram and an ATi HD5470 512MB Graphics Card.
In conclusion, it would be fantastic to see Mozilla tweak the settings (if possible) to allow AVG safe search to work with Firefox 4, Until then I will go on using 3.6 and IE9 from Microsoft.

Close Firefox 4. Go to C:\Program Files (x86)\AVG\AVG10\Firefox and open install.rdf in Notepad. Change 3.6.* to 4.0.* exit and save. Done.

TS3354 I have an Nvidia GTX 580 and a Dell U2711, which has HDCP support. Why do I get the message in itunes that my hardware does not support it?

I have an Nvidia GTX 580 and a Dell U2711, which has HDCP support. Why do I get the message in itunes that my hardware does not support it?
I downloaded 1080p content, not sure why this would not work with the hardware I have.
Bryan

Updated first post with dmesg output. I added all of it, but here's a quick snippet of the tail (which is right after booting up and attempting to autostart SLiM)
[ 13.426857] NVRM: API mismatch: the client has the version 310.19, but
NVRM: this kernel module has the version 304.60. Please
NVRM: make sure that this kernel module and all NVIDIA driver
NVRM: components have the same version.
Why is the kernel getting 304.60 ? That's got to be the issue, but I don't why the kernel is getting 304.60 ...
Output of pacman -Qs nvidia:
local/conky-nvidia 1.9.0-2
An advanced, highly configurable system monitor for X based on torsmo
local/lib32-nvidia-utils 310.19-1
NVIDIA drivers utilities and libraries. (32-bit)
local/libvdpau-git-flashpatch 20120825-1
Nvidia VDPAU library from git with patch to fix flash blue tint and bleed through
local/libxnvctrl 304.51-1
NVIDIA X Ctrl library
local/nvidia 310.19-2
NVIDIA drivers for linux.
local/nvidia-utils 310.19-1
NVIDIA drivers utilities and libraries.

Hostapd rt2800pci «Hardware does not support configured mode»

Hello
I am trying to use my fit-pc as a wifi access point. Here is wat lspci says about my wireless card:
lspci |grep Wireless
03:00.0 Network controller: Ralink corp. RT3090 Wireless 802.11n 1T/1R PCIe
It seems to be possible through with the mac80211 driver ( http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/rt2800pci )
In my hostapd.conf tell hostapd.conf to use nl80211.
Still when I do : #hostapd /etc/hostapd/hostapd.conf
I've got this message :
"Configuration file: /etc/hostapd/hostapd.conf
Hardware does not support configured mode
wlan0: IEEE 802.11 Hardware does not support configured mode (2)
Could not select hw_mode and channel. (-1)
wlan0: Unable to setup interface.
rmdir[ctrl_interface]: No such file or directory
zsh: exit 1 hostapd /etc/hostapd/hostapd.conf
Someone know if there is a particual configuration to use rt2800pci?

I had learned that the free DVD sets that Oracle ships are always for 64-bit systems. Owners of 32-bit systems will have to either download from http://edelivery.oracle.com or copy a distribution DVD from a friend. The 32-bit media can also be ordered from the http://oraclestore.oracle.com site for about $20USD.
Sorry for any confusion this may have caused.

HP Color Laser Jet CP2025dn Windows 7 driver does not support the built in duplexing hardware

Windows Printer Driver Version 5.0.3 does not support the printers built in duplexing hardware. This is true of the PCL5 driver, the PCL6 driver and the Post Script driver.
It does support manual duplexing (stand there and feed the printer after the first side prints).

Windows Printer Driver Version 5.0.3 does not support the printers built in duplexing hardware. This is true of the PCL5 driver, the PCL6 driver and the Post Script driver.
It does support manual duplexing (stand there and feed the printer after the first side prints).

Apple hardware test does not support this machine, iMac 27" mid 2010

Hi, I have a mid 2010 iMac 27inch with OSX Maverics updated to the very latest version.
I need to hardware test my mac but I am finding it impossible. If I press D at bootup, nothing.
Option D, loads hardware test, but it comes back saying:
"Apple hardware test does not support this machine."
I don't have the original install disk for the mac and it has been updated several times online to the latest version. What am I supposed to do in this instance?

That Mac model requires the original system disk to run AHT. You can call Apple at 1-800-MYAPPLE, and ask for an operating system specialist. Then you can request replacement system disks for your computer. The cost us usually under US$20.
Have your serial number at hand; it is required for the techs to find the correct disk set for your model.

After Effects does not support Quadro K4200

After Effects CC 2014 is running on Windows 7 64bit.
I installed the latest driver.. After Effects does not support Quadro K4200
Here is a copy of GPU setting in AE.
Can you fix this issue?
Fast Draft:    Available
Texture Memory:    2048.00 MB
Ray-tracing:    GPU (unsupported)
Unsupported GPU enabled for CUDA acceleration
OpenGL
Vendor:    NVIDIA Corporation
Device:    Quadro K4200/PCIe/SSE2
Version:    2.1.2
Total Memory:    3.93 GB
Shader Model:    4.0 or later
CUDA
Driver Version:    6.5
Devices:    1 (Quadro K4200) (unsupported)
Current Usable Memory:    3.67 GB (at application launch)
Maximum Usable Memory:    4.00 GB

Are you saying that After Effects isn't using your GPU to accelerate the ray-traced renderer even when you tick the box?
Or are you just asking the AE team to add official support for your GPU to the ray-traced renderer?
If it's the second, too bad. The AE team has stopped all development on the ray-traced renderer. It is considered obsolete. They are working on better integration with C4D: details of CINEMA 4D integration with After Effects The fact that it ships for free with AE is pretty cool.
However, if it's the first, alright; let's troubleshoot! What exact version number of AE are you using? (13.0.1? 13.1.0? 13.1.1?) How long does it take to render when you switch the CPU and then how long does it take when you switch it to GPU with the box checked?

Lightroom CC does not support Intel HD 3000 on MacBook Pro - please add support !!!!

Installed the new Lightroom but it does not support the graphics on:
MacBook Pro (13-inch, Early 2011)
OSX 10.10.3 (actual version)
Intel HD Graphics 3000 512 MB
I see that Intel 4400 is required in Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Help | Lightroom GPU FAQ,
but this peace of Hardware is just only 4 yeas old .... !
please do add this !

Andy
Thanks... But again, why would I have to do this now when it was never a problem before?
In any case, all the footage I'm using in this project is XDCAM EX, the only difference being that some footage is 720, while other footage is 1080, and then there's also a variation in terms of interlaced and progressive footage accross the board (it's a rock band documentary, don't ask! )... Could this have something to do with it?
I kinda doubt it, cos one of the TV shows I work on has the same codec, resolution and other settings accorss the board, and I experience the same stutter on these projects...

[290x] MSI Gaming App error "The platform does not support this application."

Using the latest AMD Omega drivers, I am unable to launch the Gaming App and am presented with this error - "The platform does not support this application."
I have tried downloading Gaming APP 3.0.0.16.zip from another post on the topic but I am receiving the same error. The only other thing I've seen as a 'solution' is to install the drivers from the MSI support page for my card - however this is version 14.4 and is over 3 months old, I don't really think that's a viable solution.
Any ideas?
Thanks!

Quote from: JLio01 on 07-January-15, 11:55:18
Is your vga driver 14.12? Any other settings changed?
Do you have any other msi or vga software installed?
Can you do a fresh re-install OS and what's the language of your OS?
Yes, Catalyst Omega. No other software or hardware changes.
Yes MSI Afterburner. Have tried uninstalling and installing gaming app, have also not had it running when trying to launch MSI Gaming app. No joy there.
No I can't, that's not really an option for a piece of software like this which worked before but doesn't since the latest AMD driver updates.
Quote from: JLio01 on 07-January-15, 16:07:38
Since your motherboard is not the supported gaming series mobos, there might be something detected wrong with your card. The error message shown if neither motherboard nor vga is supported in Gaming App. I suggest use AMD Catalyst Clean Uninstall Utility to totally uninstall the current driver:
http://www.techspot.com/drivers/driver/file/information/16748/
and re-install the latest driver 14.12. I have no problem using Gaming App 3.0.0.16 with my R9 290X, hope you too.
I have never seen anything stating that you need a supported gaming series motherboard to use the MSI Gaming App - maybe for other features if it has any, but the gaming app I used when I got my card was a little box with a few options for the GPU on it. Tried uninstalling and reinstalling the driver already unfortunately, using both AMD CCUU and a second attempt with DDU. No change at all, the exact same error message.
But as I've said, the fact that there is more than one person reporting this and older drivers make the gaming app work, it's definitely a software ended problem on certain configurations. I have installed driver 14.4 now and can once again use the gaming app, just as someone with a different card and different motherboard has stated in another thread. xxhttps://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=251885.0xx this solution however is not really acceptable.

Cisco OS 2000.2.7 does not support MCS 7825I1 ?

Hi Pros,
I have a new installation coming up of CCM 4.1.3 & Unity 4.0.5
Seems Cisco has sent wrong set of OS Cds for CCM. The Server is a IBM make (MCS 7825I1) with Prescott 3.4 CPU & 2GB RAM alongwith 2 * SATA 80GB HDD.
When I insert Hardware Detection CD for 2000.2.7 it says "This OS version does not support the detected server. Remove the disk and press any key to reboot.
My BoM says:
CM4.1-K9-7825= SW CallMgr 4.1, MCS-7825 2
MCS-7825-I1-IPC1 HW Only MCS-7825-I1 with 2GB RAM
and SATA RAID
2
Can I install like this - Run IBM ServeRaid, Prep server, Insert Win2k cd, then after install run OS Upgrade 2000.2.7
Will this work?
Regards,
Pratik

i am not sure why the CPU speed should matter.......
I don't know what to say, if you have the "a" hardware detection disk, this should work. I have never had a problem once i had the right media so i will step aside and wait to see if someone else can help.
Steve

Installed graphics card does not support the opengl features recommended

I've installed FCP6 on my PowerMac (PPC G4 DP 1.25GHz), and when I run it, I get a warning ("...installed graphics card does not support the opengl features recommended...") and the program ends. The graphics card is the ATI Radeon 9000 Pro (64MB)
I'm looking for a definitive answer regarding my hardware compatibility with FCS2 (specifically, FCP6). I'm NOT looking for an answer along the lines of: your system is too old to run this.
I've checked the minimum system requirements from the apple website (http://www.apple.com/finalcutstudio/specs/
and http://www.apple.com/finalcutstudio/download/):
* A Macintosh computer with a 1.25GHz or faster PowerPC G4, PowerPC G5, Intel Core Duo, or Intel Xeon processor
* 1GB of RAM
* An AGP or PCI Express Quartz Extreme graphics card (Final Cut Studio is not compatible with integrated Intel graphics processors)
* A display with 1024-by-768 resolution or higher
* Mac OS X v10.4.11 or later
* QuickTime 7.3 or later
* DVD drive for installation
I have all that stuff. What I'd like is to know which component of my system is FCP6 complaining about (vis-a-vis the error message above), alternatively, if someone has had success with a similar configuration, I'd like to know anything they think might help.
Thanks in advance for any helpful advice you may have.

The minimum would probably be an nVidia Fx5200 or an ATI 9600...
Patrick

Apple TV 3 does not support the Microsoft Wedge Mobile Bluetooth Keyboard

Apple TV (3. Generation) still (17.02.2013) does not support the Microsoft Wedge Mobiloe Keyboard. I bought it especially for use with Apple TV but it doesn't work. Apple TV finds the keyboard with the exact name but can not connect. No 4 digit code appears that you can type in to your keyboard to compelete the connecting process and after a few seconds "connections fails" appears.
Now i dont't know if i should send it back to amazon to get back my money or keep it and wait until it maybe will work some day... I red from articles from beginning of january 2013 that a new Version of Apple TV is in the Pipeline (3.2) and that it has an other bluetooth chip. The same as in the iphone 5 that works with the MS wedge keyboard. So i really don't know if i should wait for the next few updates of my Apple TV or wait for a new Apple TV hardware- Update... Telephone calls with apple and microsoft doesn't brought useful results. Restore function of Apple TV doesn't work.
I hate that Apple always brew their own soup... Bluetooth is know for an easy connection to ALL devices but Apple TV supports only a hand full of keyboards. **** S**t!!!!!!!!!!!! -.-

Hi
This is the solution from Microsoft website. Work fine (don´t forget press and hold Fn key!!):
Connecting the Wedge Mobile Keyboard to a tablet PC
By default, the Bluetooth Wedge Mobile Keyboard pairs with most tablet PCs through secure simple pairing (SSP) with a passkey. Some tablets, however, may not support SSP well with a passkey.
In order to successfully pair your Wedge Mobile Keyboard to such a tablet, use the following alternative pairing mode.
Pair your keyboard through SSP without a passkey
Press and hold the Fn key at the same time as you press and hold the Connect button located under the keyboard. After 3 to 5 seconds, a small light on the top of the keyboard will blink green and red alternately. This means that your keyboard is discoverable to your tablet within 6 minutes.
On your tablet PC, from the Start menu, select Control Panel, and in Category view, locate Hardware and Sound.
Select Add a device.
When the keyboard is listed, select it, and follow the instructions to successfully pair your Wedge Keyboard with your tablet.
Note
If you want to pair your keyboard with a tablet or other computer that supports SSP with a passkey, press and hold the Connect button only.

Why does Silverlight install process state that my 64-bit Win Vista OS does NOT support the 64-bit version of Silverlight?

As of Monday 4/20, I've encountered a significant problem with Silverlight on my Vista PC.
Several weeks ago I read a brief item stating that Google would be dropping support for npapi and that it would affect Silverlight sometime in April. One of my key daily apps uses Silverlight, but I didn't receive notification from that software's author
about the pending change and how it would be handled. Successfully used the app every week (Mon-Fri) this month for 8-10 hrs/dy day (as I've been doing for the past ~5+ years: past year under Chrome, year before that under FireFox, ~3 prior years
under IE) and on Fri 4/17 shut it down for the weekend. When I booted up on Mon morning and tried to log into the key app however, it prompted me to download and install Silverlight, acting as though I never had it installed!
I recalled the earlier warning about Google dropping support, so I closed Chrome, started up FireFox, but got the same prompt from the app -- it directed me to install Silverlight. I downloaded it (had no choice as to which version, just got the "Silverlight_x64.exe"
file) and got part-way through the install when this error msg popped up: "Unable to Install Silverlight. Your operating system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight". WHAT?! Clicking on the "more info"
link led to this msg: "Message ID: 1518. Your operating system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight. Click here for the latest version of Silverlight." That link simply led back to the download page which resulted
in receiving another copy of the same executable file.
According to my system ( > Control Panel > System ), I'm running "Windows Vista Home Premium", with a "System Type: 64-bit Operating System". I've been using this same Vista PC since Sep 2008 and running Silverlight for
around the past 5 yrs.
? -- Why doe the Silverlight installer code flag my OS as not supported?
? -- Is there a way to get an older version of Silverlight that will run under Vista?
Thanks in advance for any helpful comments.

Andy -- Thanks for the link, but I'm not adventurous enough to download from a non-MSFT site.
Besides, since I didn't make any changes to my hardware/software config, I expect a MSFT rep to explain why their two programs suddenly stopped working together and then provide whatever code fix is needed. A phone call to their tech support (predictably)
led to nowhere but a recommendation to purchase one of the company's support offerings (which I declined to pursue). The Silverlight development team appears to participate in these forums, so I'd hope one or more of them offers a realistic solution.
Here's something I forgot to mention in my original post: In several of the threads on this subject (some dating back to 2008!), people have
suggested running IE as the browser vs FireFox or Chrome; however, that idea fails to note that the error msg (Message ID:1518) clearly states that "your operating
system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight"; it doesn't say anything about
what browser you're using.

Macbook Pro Retina HDMI Does Not Support 2560 x 1080

I have both the early and late 2013 rMBP 15 inch but it seems like the early 2013 does not support my Dell U2913WM at maximum resolution of 2560 x 1080 for some reason on HDMI. Are the HDMI ports any different between the two? I'm tried using SwitchResX, but at 2560 x 1080, I can only go up to 53 Hz before it says invalid configuation on the early 2013 rMBP. On the late 2013 rMBP, it can output 2560 x 1080 at 60 Hz fine. It would seem like both graphics cards are more than capable of pushing this resolution, and if I connect through Displayport, they're both fine too. I was hoping to use HDMI though to free up a Thunderbolt port. Why are the HDMI ports not outputting at the same capabilities?

Absolutely, I understand that but I'm wondering if or why Apple has limited the HDMI port on the early 2013 rMBP. HDMI 1.4 should be more than capable at outputting up to 4k resolution, so it would seem like Apple is intentially limiting the early 2013 rMBP to HDMI 1.2? At least one post from as early as 2012 seems to suggest that installing Windows on a rMBP allows higher outputs. I thought Mavericks included support for HDMI 1.4 (http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?101431-10-9-Mavericks-4K-working-tes ting-it-now) but did they not extend it down to the early 2013 rMBP? Seems like it would be able to support it, no?
Perhaps the better question is whether anyone has been able to output anything at over 1080P on anything other than the latest rMBP after upgrading to Mavericks?
From the earlier discussion:
"The port definitely supports it, but OS X is another story. If I boot into Windows and connect it to a display capable of displaying 2560x1440 over HDMI, it just works. If I'm in OSX, it refuses to allow anything over 1920x1200. Even if I try to force the resolution with SwitchResX, it doesn't work. If I create a custom resolution with a 40Hz refresh rate instead of 60Hz, then it does actually work. 2560x1440 @ 40Hz fits within the bandwidth constraints of a single link at 165MHz. So it appears that OSX limits the port to 1.2 frequencies. I'm not realy sure why -- HDMI 1.4 should allow for frequencies upto 340MHz, and the hardware is clearly capable based on Windows."
Now that Mavericks supports higher than 1080P over HDMI at least on the latest rMBP, did they just not extend that support to earlier rMBP's even though the hardware is capable of it?

BPE_adapter The process does not support the given synchronous interface

We are using PI 7.0 Sp 14 .
Old dev box needed to be upgrade with 64 bit hardware. We did a fresh installation and done all the technical configuraiton. Imported SLD , IR,ID , Runtime value mapping . All scenario working fine after migration except one particular scenari which involves SOAP Web service .
Our scenario is Extern system send SOAP call to PI - BPM_SYNC_ASYnc_process --> BPM Proxy_send
this BPM proxy_send to ECC R/eceiver at R/3
We are getting the following error after migraiton. Please help
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="BPE_ADAPTER">SYNCHONOUS_MESSAGE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>The process does not support the given synchronous interface or does not support synchronous messages</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>

Is there any other Configuration to be done at the Abap side part from BPE_XI_customising (Automatic customising) done as part of the post installation steps .
Wondering any other configuration needs to be done at the ABAP side (as BPE is running on the ABAp stack) to resolve this.
Thanks

Quadro2000 does not support ie9 GPU hardware acceleration.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for