Quality management - Collective usage decision

I want to do collective usage decision, I am using T-code QA16, but i am not getting the list of inspection lots.
Do I need to process some other transaction before it ?
QA16 - collective usage decision for OK parts. What is mean by ok parts. is it that we have to release these inspection lots before usage decision ?

Anybody knows ?

Similar Messages

  • Quality score by usage decision?

    Dear SAPIENTS,
    Can any one help me in creation of this configuration setting?
    I would like to have quality score calculation from usage decision. Score calculation should be done by number of quantity received against order.
    Suppose if 100 quantity ordered:
    25% Deviation means 75 only received then score is 75
    Likewise for 50%, 75% and 100%
    Regards,

    Hi
    please refer
    Re: Quality Score in Vendor Rating
    Regards'
    Sujit

  • Post Collective Usage Decision

    Hi ;
    I have a scenario where we have around 4000 open 09 Inspection lots where the Usage Decision has not been made and results have not been recorded (Setting in MIC is Required) but the stock posting hasbeen carried out .
    Want to post the Usage decision for all the Lots ,can't use QA10 as there are open charateristics ( required) or is there a workaround to collectively make the Usage decision without having to enter the results for the MIC.
    Thanks

    Thanks Sujit for ur reply..I was wondering if we update the MIC to optinal and update the plans using QS27 can we Mass update existing the Insp Lots with the current plan without going thru traditional update via QA02.
    Regards

  • Partial quality inspection & partial usage decision?

    Hello Friends
    Inspection lot is created when GR is done against purchase order, in normal case result is recorded for whole lot and usage decision is made partially / fully.
    Say business want to inspect (record result) only 50 pieces and want to do usage decision of 50 pieces immediately and again want to inspect (record result) another 50 pieces of same lot and want to do the usage decision u2026u2026u2026u2026how to do it?
    As per my knowledge once inspection is done & usage decision is done system stops to inspect that lot again.
    Looking for your valuable input as soon as possible.
    Thanks & Regards
    Swanad

    hi
    inspect (record result) only 50 pieces and want to do usage decision of 50 pieces immediately and again want to inspect (record result) another 50 pieces of same lot and want to do the usage decision
    For result recording to be done for  qunatity In control indicator of each char tick on long term Inspection.
    This will allow you to do RR after UD has taken.
    For UD to be done Partially means stock posting partially ...
    You can create a UD code(AP) & in customization do not post it automatically.
    Then You can only post 50 Qty initially with UD -AP
    then for rest of the  qty in QA32 select those lots with UD & stock post rest of the items when you carry out RR for rest of 50 .
    This is the solution
    Regards
    Sujit

  • QM-Collective Usage Decision

    Dear all
    there are so many inspection lots of insp.type 04.now i donu2019t want to record characteristics for these lots and only want to make ud of all these lots collectively. so how can i do this.
    I have already tried QA16 but i am unable to see lots but these lots exist when i see in qa32.so please give me its solution.

    Dear Ahmad,
    Congratulation!!!!
    It is very simple as it looks, If you set the MICs as optional system will not check them while performing UD or Stock Posting through QA11 or any other transactions.
    Now it depends up on the dignity of requirement that how much it requires to perform UD without recording results, if it is so important then you can keep them as Optional once.
    But along with them what I would suggest it to keep them as "Long Term" also, So that in future in any case if you would be in need to record the result (e.g. for taking a COA printing out of that lot), then you will not get trapped.
    Regards,
    Shyamal
    Edited by: Shyamal Joshi on Jul 17, 2008 11:31 AM

  • Collective Usage decision

    Dear all
    there are so many inspection lots of insp.type 04.now i donu2019t want to record characteristics for these lots and only want to make ud of all these lots collectively. so how can i do this.
    I have already tried QA16 but i am unable to see lots but these lots exist when i see in qa32.so please give me its solution.

    You can not do collective UD on lots with no results.  You must do them one by one.
    If your system is creating to many 04 inspection lots and you are not recording results, then the design is flawed in some manner.  You should not have excessive lots and you should rarely have inspection lots without inspection results.
    Sorry.
    Craig

  • Work flow for Rejections in Quality- Usage decision

    Dear all
    We are in the process of activating work flow for Quality Inspection, During Usage decision there may be rejections for which we need to trigger a mail to the Internal department , stating the Remarks, description, rejected quantity etc ,
    If any one has come across the same scenario kindly help us so as to implement the same in our organization.
    Regards
    Rahul Bhat

    Hi,
    You can do any of the following according to you Requirement.
    1) Below the Rejection Branch using the Send mail you can send the mail to Respective person.
    2) Other wise using the Function Module you can send the mail, refer this l[ink|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/nYKdAw ].
    3) Else place this Std. Task TS20000139 and provide the necessary binding below the Rejection branch a popup will open and the user can enter the comments and it will go to the Person whom you want.
    Try any of this according to you requirement.
    Regards,
    Surjith Kumar

  • Production Order Receipt Block before Usage Decision is Made

    Dear all,
    I have a requirement to block production order receipt through MIGO into any storage location before the usage decision has been made for that production order.
    This should be the rule for all non serial items, meaning that it should only apply to batch controlled and neither batch nor serial controlled materials.
    Could someone please help me on this?
    Thanks,
    Sergiy

    Hi,
    Is it possible through by maintaining the inspection type for the material master. Then the material will be moved to quality stock after usage decision then you can move that material to unrestricted material.
    For Batch managed or serial number profile defined material don't activate the inspection type.
    Hope this might help you.
    Regards
    Ravi shankar.

  • Quality management - can I change description of quality lot after UD ?

    Quality management - can I change description of quality lot after Usage Decision ?

    Hi,
    Try in transaction QA12 to change the usage decision & then try to change to description of the lot.
    Regards,
    Prashant

  • Control the Posting of Quantity through Usage Decision

    Hi Qm Gurus,
       How will i control the posting of quantities from quality inspection to any types of stock? For instance, If the Usage Decision Code made is Rejected, how will the user be controlled or prompted to post quantities only to blocked stock and not to unrestricted or any types; without viewing the Manager's Usage Decision "Rejected".This is very crucial to pharmaindustries because normally, the manager is the one who made the usage decision, and the rank and file will be assigned to post the quantities. how shall this be resolved. Hope anybody can help me. if possible teach me on how to configure this, and there tcodes to be used by different users. I think Qa11 by manager.
    Regards,
    Matildo, edsel
    Qm Consultant

    Dear Murugsan,
    Can i control the posting of qty from UD in storage location level e.g. if a user give the UD from Q/INSP. location (1701) & by mistake he does not change the location TO (2500 BSR) then system put the qty in 1701(unrestricted) my requirement is that system by default pick the 2500 location if UD is given for acceptance as OK.I have seen your reply to another similar type of requirement but does not find any storage location option in QS51.
    R SEHGAL

  • QM Module: Usage Decision for Inspection Lot

    Dear All,
    After made of Usage Decision the Notification will receive to the respective Managers as mentioned below:
    IF Usage Decision is <b>QCR</b> then Notification will receive to only Marketing Manager
    IF Usage Decision is <b>MR</b> then Notification will receive to Logistics Manager, QC manager and Production Manager
    IF Usage Decision is <b>MA</b> then Notification will receive to Logistics Manager, QC manager and Production Manager
    IF Usage Decision is <b>MAC</b> then Notification will receive to Logistics Manager, QC manager and Production Manager
    IF Usage Decision is <b>QCA</b> then Notification will receive to Logistics Manager, Marketing Manager and Production Manager
    Any Suggestions pls, workflow logic in this requirement.
    Is there any Solutions without ABAP coding.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Prabhakar Dharmala
    Message was edited by:
            Prabhakar Dharmala

    I'm sorry, I am not sure if I understand any more now, but one quick check: When you write RULE, are you specifically meaning RESPONSIBILITY RULE?
    I said that a rule is needed to specify work item agents (workflow step specification of selected agents). It is not quite true, you can specify the selected agents in other ways such as using expressions etc. You could therefore create a subtype of your business object where you define virtual attributes for the different agents you mentioned, i.e. a virtual attribute AG_MARKETING_MANAGER, another one called AG_LOGISTICS_MANAGER, a third one called AG_QC_MANAGER, and finally one called AG_PRODUCTION_MANAGER. These should have the data type TSWHACTOR.
    However, you are asking for a method that does not involve rules, AND does not involve ABAP coding. I think you are out of luck there, because the virtual attributes will require (some) ABAP coding, and of course this approach is of more interest if these managers can be determined based on data that are maintained anyway - to save you the addition maintenance of the responsibility matrix in the workflow (responsibility) rule.
    You can obtain exactly the same by creating a workflow rule that takes whatever parameters are relevant, plus the Usage Decision.
    If you want to send a single step/mail to all the managers (I couldn't quite understand if you wanted a single step to a varying number of managers or a varying number of steps) the latter solution would be the best one, as the rule would give you the correct list of managers without any additional steps in the workflow.
    If you create virtual attributes you can use container operations in the workflow to put all the relevant managers into one multiline container element. But that seems rather awkward compared to creating a workflow rule.

  • Quality Management - Usage Decision error

    Hi all,
    My scenerio is - There is a material ABC which is procured from the supplier. The Quality of the material is 'below standards'. However, material ABC, in Tcode QA11 Usage decision was done as ACC1 (accepted). Since the material ABC is not meeting quality standards, Usage decision is changed to RET1 (Bad Raw Material - Return) using Tcode QA12.
    Now the problem is that when I enter QA11, the system does not allow me to enter as a message appears 'Detailed Info- Usage decision made is disallowed' is showing.
    Please provide me a solution as the material is lying in the unrestricted stock and it has to be returned to the supplier. Also please consider costing implications.
    Thanks in advance

    Cancel the inspection lot in QM using the function to change the usage decision.
    Logistics - Quality management - Quality inspection - Inspection lot - Usage decision - Change with History - Usage decisions - Functions - Cancel lot 
    Reward if cleared and close the thread.

  • Quality Management - usage decision

    I understand the U/D is done through QA32. Can you suggest a transaction for mass processing of usage decision for multiple insp lots

    QA11 is also UD for a single lot, you can try using QA16 which collective UD for Inspection lots.
    RJ

  • Need to send data, after Usage decision in quality inspection (QA11)

    Hi all,
    After Usage decision in quality inspection (QA11), i need to send some data like material number, qty etc to external database or to external party. is there anyway i can achive this in real time? real time means, it should send the appropriate data to external party after usage decision is made.
    Thanks
    Pabi

    Hi,
    You can change results recording in case the MIC in the inspection plan of the lot are marked as "long term characteristics", else it wont be possible to change result recording.
    you can change the UD code only after giving the Usage decision.
    you cannot change the defects recording.
    Thanks
    SUMIT

  • Quality inspection stock showing in urestricted stock without usage decision

    Dear Gurus,
    We have came across a serious issue in Quality department as follows.
    The skip stock status "REL  SKIP SPRQ CROK QLCH" is showing in unrestricted use stock even before the usage decision is made. Now when we are trying to reject the skip material, in MMBE there is no stock against Quality inspection. & the stock when rejected is getting deducted from unrestricted stock.
    Request you please guide me so as to transfer the "REL  SKIP SPRQ CROK QLCH" stock yo quality ispection once 105 is done.
    Kindly guide what configuration settings need to be changed.
    Regards,
    Mahesh

    Thanks Saravan.
    As I am new to QM kindly clarify following things to me.
    1. Even if we reject the skip stock by making the usage decision, it won't be deducted from unrestricted.
    2. Skip/DOL lot will never be shown under Quality inspection in MMBE.
    3. The only rejection of SKIP/DOL that will happen is the line rejection.
    4. Once the line rejection happens materila status will be removed as DOL & converted to normal for next 5 lots.
    Correct me if I am wrong.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Mahesh

Maybe you are looking for

  • IMessage is not working in IOS 7 , Any workaround

    iMessage is not working in IOS 7 , Any workaround

  • Linking to a phone dialer in Muse

    In the new videos about how to create mobile versions of your site, both instructors show that you can add a "click to call" feature to the phone number. This allows the person visiting the site to just tap on the phone number to bring up the phone's

  • Missing thumbnails in the timeline

    I'm learning how to cut video in the timeline, and noticed that only the first three cuts result in a thumbnail image, while the last 4 cuts are displayed by a small grey box with a + symbol in the center. Am I doing something wrong here? How does on

  • Mail:  Apple Inc as Sender

    I just updated my MacBook Pro to Yosemite.  In Mail, any messages received from other Mac users now show up in my Inbox as being from Apple Inc.  Once I open the message, it shows the actual sender's name/email.  Any suggestions on which settings to

  • IPhoto had a question mark

    I can not find iPhoto now. It had a question mark on it. I tried moving to another spot in the dock and mistakenly tossed it off the dock and it has disappeared. I can't find it anywhere. How do i get it back