Query Based Taxonomies

Hello,
I've created successfully a query based taxonomy. I also defined the queries to the folders within the taxonomy. Now my problem is, that a document only belongs to one folder. But in some cases, that's not nice, e.g. when you want to navigate through the hierarchy.
Example:
I've got a structure like Folder F1, under that a Folder F2.
For folder F1 I defined a query: property P1 contains value V1.
For folder F2 I defined a query: property P2 contains value V2.
After updating the taxonomy it should now be possible, that documents which are classifications of folder F2 also classify to folder F1.
How to do that?
Help would be appreciated.
Best regards,
Denis

Hello Karin,
thank you for your answer. Does this mean, that a navigation through the taxonomy hierarchy is not possible (e.g. with a km navigation iView?). Taxonomies are stored in KM under /Taxonomies and I thought that a navigation with a km navigation iView is possible. But I think the real benefit of taxonomies is, that the deeper the hierarchy folder is, the more classified and smaller are the results. But when documents get only classified to more folders when the folders are on the same hierarchy level, how should a navigation be realized?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Denis

Similar Messages

Query Based Taxonomy - Dynamic Creation of a Query Problem

Hi,
I'm trying to create new category nodes in a taxonomy and to assing them queries. I know how to do this, but I encountered a strange behavior. Here is the situation:
I have a string property DocumentType. When manualy creating a query, it looks like:
DocumentType CONTAINS "Some string"
But when I do the same using code I get:
DocumentType IS "Some string"
And as a result of this, the taxanomy is not working properly.
Here is the code:
     indexService =
     (IIndexService) ResourceFactory
     .getInstance()
     .getServiceFactory()
     .getService(
     IServiceTypesConst.INDEX_SERVICE);
     //        This kind of classification index offers functionality working with query based taxonomies
     qbcIndex = (IQBClassificationIndex) indexService.getIndex(indexId);
     //        Get a query folder - a query folder is a representation of a query based taxonomies category
     queryFolder = qbcIndex.getQueryFolder(RID.getRID(folder));
     //        List of IQueryEntry objects for the query folder
     queryEntryList = queryFolder.getQuery(context);
     //        Cast the IQBClassificationIndex into a ISearchIndex object
     searchIndex = (ISearchIndex) qbcIndex;
     queryEntry = searchIndex.getNewQueryEntry();
     queryEntry.setRowType(IQueryEntry.ROW_TYPE_ATTRIBUTE);
     queryEntry.setPropertyName(propertyName);
     queryEntry.setPropertyOperator(IQueryEntry.PROPERTY_OPERATOR_EQUAL);
     queryEntry.setValue(propertyValue);
     queryEntry.setTermAction(IQueryEntry.TERM_ACTION_EXACT);
     queryEntryList.add(queryEntry);
     //        Set the query for the query folder
     queryFolder.setQuery(queryEntryList, context);
     qbcIndex.updateCategoryContents("Document_Types", false, context);
Can somebody tell me what am I doing wrong please. Isn't it because of IQueryEntry.PROPERTY_OPERATOR_EQUAL? Is there any substring operator?
Thanks a lot.

Hi, Robert
In this moment, I have a problem with Query Based Taxonomy, maybe could you help me. I insert the query in to the taxonomy from code, but when i use the method
qbcIndex.updateCategoryContents("/taxonomies/borrame5/Prueba2", false, context);
I got the next exception:
#1.5#0014C210F3D1002A000001200000565B000431CC93AD5979#1180654627543#System.err#sap.com/irj#System.err#dummy01#10241#####SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_17##0#0#Error##Plain###     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:170)#
#1.5#0014C210F3D100310000012B0000565B000431CCC47166AB#1180655445698#System.err#sap.com/irj#System.err#dummy01#10241#####SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_18##0#0#Error##Plain###com.sapportals.wcm.service.indexmanagement.IndexNotReadyException: Some documents are not included in this update because indexing has not been finished yet.#
#1.5#0014C210F3D100310000012C0000565B000431CCC4717417#1180655445701#System.err#sap.com/irj#System.err#dummy01#10241#####SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_18##0#0#Error##Plain###     at com.sapportals.wcm.service.indexmanagement.retrieval.trex.AbstractTrexIndex.updateCategoryContents(AbstractTrexIndex.java:2493)#
I have doubt what parameters i need to pass to the method updateCategoryContents,
Let me give some information:
taxonomy:
   /taxonomies/borrame5/Prueba2
repository:
   /documents/Portal_KOF/KM/Pruebas1/Pruebas Versionamiento
classification and search index:
   borrame5
   I can't classify automatically, when i insert the query from code. When I manually insert the query from the portal, automatic classification run perfectly.
Thanks
Greetings
JARO.

Query Based Classification Issue

Hi all,
I have got a scenario where I have to classify some project related documents based on the Project Name, Document Type, Module etc. I believe the best way to do this is using Query Based Taxonomies.
But, If I dont have a naming template for the documents and cant assign predefined propertied to documents, what is the best alternative to get the classification done?
Thanks and Regards,
Ajay.

HI
r u trying to define properties at the document level then it doesnot works because metadata of KM and metadata of document are different.
u can define pre-defined properties at the folder level in KM.
why dont you use example based classification as u train ur taxonomies with example and it inturn index furher document automatically based on your example document.
But it still deponds upon individual requirements.
Regards,
Vijay.

Query based taxonomy from scratch gives NoSuchMethodError...

I'm trying to create a query based taxonomy following the instuctions specified in the help docs: KM Platform -> Admin Guide -> Content Mgmt -> Taxonomies and Classification -> Creating a QBT -> from scratch. I created an index on a newly created (hence empty) folder in the 'documents' repository. So, essentially, the data source points to that folder. Also, I selected 'TREX Classification' on the 'Service' drop-down while creating the index. I left the crwler profile as blank. Then I went on to create a new 'Query Based Taxonomy'. I was able to create it alright, but as soon as I click on it to add folder and the such, I get this error:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.manager.taxonomy.TaxonomyNamespaceManager.getDocumentTaxRMRids(TaxonomyNamespaceManager.java:1876)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.manager.taxonomy.TaxonomyNamespaceManager.getTaxonomyClassResources(TaxonomyNamespaceManager.java:1831)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.manager.taxonomy.TaxonomyNamespaceManager.addChildDocuments(TaxonomyNamespaceManager.java:1942)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.manager.taxonomy.TaxonomyNamespaceManager.getChildren(TaxonomyNamespaceManager.java:368)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.CollectionImpl.internalGetChildren(CollectionImpl.java:966)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.CollectionImpl.getChildren(CollectionImpl.java:179)
Any help in solving this is highly apprecaited.
We run EP6 SP2.
I did NOT create a 'crawler profile' for this set up.
thanks,
Biju.

Hi Biju,
re. your NW'04 SP stack 4 migration intention:
NW'04 is still in ramp-up (SP stack 4 is the current shipment bundle of it) so at the current point in time, only participating ramp-up customers can use it.
A migration from EP6.0 SP2 to NW'04 will be possible (but not during the ramp-up phase).
From a Knowledge Management & Collaboration perspective, we will port most of the NW'04 SP stack 4 functions to EP6.0 SP2 as well. These functions will be shipped as EP6.0 SP2 Patch 5 (planned shipment date beginning of Q4 / 2004) so for mid-term, you can also plan to stay on EP6.0 SP2 if you have no other pressing reasons for going to NW'04 (e.g. enhanced Web AS functions).
This feature porting from NW -> EP6.0 SP2 is an 'only-once' action, however, and NetWeaver will be the release for new features in the future.
Regards,
Joerg

Query Based Classification & custom properties

Hi all,
Is there a way to build a query based classification with custom properties?
Regards,
Orlando Covault

Hi Frank,
Very cool documentation, Ill give you points for that but my question remains and I think that the answer is no... Theres no way that I could use custom properties in the Query base classification I am waiting for my environment to run some test, but if some one have another comment on this subject Ill appreciated it.
Regards,
Orlando Covault
P.D. I have another question about the taxonomies and is about changes in the taxonomy, What happens if some moment I need to change a Taxonomy, is this supported and completed functional? I mean the classification remains and work fine or is not recommended?

BEx query based on virtual cube donu00B4t display a valid List of Value (LOV)

Hello
I have a problem with an invalid LOV. The scenario is the following; There´s a BEx query based on a virtual cube. The query has an exit variable on caracteristic that is based on 0CALMONTH.
At Universe Designer I simply create a connection, a universe based on this query and export.
At Web Intelligence (also at Live Office), when I try to execute de query, the prompt to fill my exit variable display a list of value that doesn´t match with the values of the caracteristic at the cube.
Actually, the list at the prompt starts with 01.0000 and finishes with 05.0968.
In Universe Designer, the option to edit the list of values is not available. But I think that editing the LOV is not the correct way.
I´ve tried creating a new query based on the DSO that is the source of the virtual cube. In this case, I had a valid list. Unfortunately, I can´t use this DSO.
Did anyone already have this problem?

Hi James,
can you explain what you mean with "input length for that filed" ?
The field in the table is varchar2(120). I coudn't found options for the List of value.
Thanks for your response
Carsten
null

Include Button that executes PL/SQL procedure to SQL query based region

I would like to add two columns to a SQL query region.
These columns would not be sourced from the query, but rather would be used to execute a PL/SQL procedure.
For example, I would like to have a manager approve or deny adding an additional employee to the department.
There would be one button for APPROVE. And, one button for DENY.
The PL/SQL procedure would execute to perform the required DML based upon the selected action (either APPROVE or DENY).
A sample output would look like this:
<APPROVE>, <DENY>, John Doe, Accountant
<APPROVE>, <DENY>, Jane Doe, Accountant
Is there any way to add a button to a SQL Query based report region where that button executes a stored proc? If so, what is the basic process for doing this?
Thanks!
-Reid

Is there any way to add a button to a SQL Query based report region where that button executes a stored proc? If so, what is the basic process for doing this?Conditional page item? You can associate processes with buttons on a page

Query based on a date range

I want to query based on a date range. I wrote the following EJB QL:
"select object(a) from ActionItems as a where a.dueDate
between ?1 and ?2"
But when I deployed the application to Oracle's EJB server, I got the following error:
Auto-deploying biogen.jar (No previous deployment found)... Invalid type for expression (a.dueDate BETWEEN ?1 AND ?2)
EJB QL statement : 'select object(a) from ActionItems as a where a.dueDate between ?1 and ?2'
EJB QL method : public abstract java.util.Collection ActionItemsLocalHome.findByDueDateRange(java.sql.Date,java.sql.Date) throws javax.ejb.FinderException
at com.sun.ejb.ejbql.parser.EjbQLParser.parse EjbQLParser.java:218)
at com.sun.ejb.ejbql.EjbQLDriver.parse(EjbQLDriver.java:86)
at com.sun.ejb.sqlgen.SQLGenerator.generateSQLForEjbQLQueries(SQLGenerator.java:704)
It works fine for a number range, but does not work for a date range.
Any one has an idea on how to write a correct EJB QL for a query based on date range?
Thanks.
Jingzhi

Re-posted. Please help!

How to build a query based on(UNION) 3 vendor InfoObject

Dear Experts:
I have a requirement to build one query based on 3 vendor InfoObjct: 0VENDOR + 0VEN_COMPC + 0VEN_PURORG.
I tried to build a multiprovider upon these 3 infoobjects, but when I Identify(Assign) the key for each InfoObject, supposely there should be 3 InfoObject for me to check (0VENDOR, 0VEN_COMPC and 0VEN_PURORG) so that I can UNION these 3 infoobjects together on vendor number. But since the reference infoobject of these 3 vendor master data is different, I can not check the 3 together.
Can anybody let me know how to build that query? I only need vendor number show once, and the attributes of 0VEN_COMPC and 0VEN_PURORG can be union to 0vENDOR.
Any post would be appreciated and thank you all in advance!
Best Regards!
Tim

Hi,
you can create a link between the vendor objects itself, means link 0vendor with 0ven_compc and 0ven_purorg. This should give you a list of all vendors multiplied with the comp codes multiplied with the purch. org. May be here it is possible to create another link between a attribute (eg. comp_code of 0ven_purorg with comp_code of 0ven_compc). In case it is not possible you need to add this link information somehow. Another option might be to create 2 queries. One on a infoset of 0vendor and 0ven_purorg and another one on 0vendor and 0ven_compc.
regards
Siggi

RWI 00200 Error while scheduling the Bex Query based Webi report

Dear All,
I am facing the below error while scheduling the Bex Query based Webi report.
Error:RWI 00200
We are using BO XI 4.0 Sp05.
Please advise

Hi,
I am on BO 4.0 SP05 Patch 6. Webi reports are just showing processing but not giving results. When I try to create new report it is throwing java security error.
Tried applet patch upgrade(From link : https://websmp207.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000902752013E) for webi certificate but didn't help.
Please suggest what could be done.
Thanks and Regards,
Ankit Sharma

Error while creating Query based taxonomy.

Hi,
I have created an index and trying to build a query based taxonomy though
Taxonomy Query Builder in content management. Earlier I have created
another index but after that I have deleted it but still while trying to build a query based
taxonomy it is giving an error that earlier index doesn't exist and not diaplaying the new
index and taxonomy that I have created. Taxonomy Trainer is working fine.
Please suggest to resolve this problem.
Thanks,
Deepika

Hi,
did u created the taxonomy in the new index are you imported.
Generally once you delete an index and you try to create an index with the same name wil give error. This may be because of the cache problem. Try to restart the server. Hope that may help you.
Raghu

Purchase register query based on down payment invoice

Hai All,
I am creating an invoice based on purchase order.The vat tax is being calculated in the downpayment. I want the vat to be displayed in the downpayment invoice as well as the a/p invoice but i m not getting it in the a/p invoice. Pls guide me with the linking of tables to get the query working. I have formatted the fields req but could not link the tables...Pls guide me with that...
Thanks & Regards,
Neela

Hi Neela,
Check the thread.
Re: Purchase register query based on down payment invoice
FROM PCH1 T0
INNER JOIN OPCH T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry
INNER JOIN OSLP T2 ON T0.SlpCode = T2.SlpCode
LEFT OUTER JOIN PCH12 T3 ON T1.DocEntry = T3.DocEntry
LEFT JOIN ODPI T4 ON T1.CardCode = T4.CardCode
INNER JOIN DPO1 T5 ON T0.ItemCode = T5.ItemCode
Close the thread, if issue solved.
Regards,
Madhan.

SQL Query based BI Pub report - Taking too long to produce the output

Hi All,
I was trying to produce a BI Publisher based report through enterprise edition of BI Publisher 10.1.3.4
Its a sql query based report and it has around 20 columns and it has around 1 lakh records.
The query actually takes only 2 seconds to execute in the database but when we execute from BI Publisher it takes a long time and also it times out most of the time
Is there something I am missing in the configuration options ?
Thanks
Shasi

I am facing the same problem as well. I am using the Publisher Web service API to run a report with 1 Million records. This report is configured to use OBIEE. It takes a lot of time to generate the report ( around 30 Mins) and even though OBIEE generates the data, my web service client either timesout. Even after increasing the timeout, a 500 internal server error is thrown . Does anyone know of a solution to this.
Thanks

SELECT QUERY BASED ON SECONDARY INDEX

Hi all,
CAN ANYONE TELL ME HOW TO WRITE SELECT QUERY BASED ON SECONDARY INDEX.
IN WHAT WAY DOES IT IMPROVE PERFORMANCE.
i KNOW WHEN CREATING SECONDARY INDEX I NEED TO GIVE AN INDEX NO -iT SHOULD BE ANY NUMBER RIGHT?
I HAVE TO LIST ALL PRIMARY KEYS FIRST AND THEN THE FIELD FOR WHICH I AM CREATING SECONDARY INDEX RIGHT?
LETS SAY I HAVE 2 PRIMARY KEYS AND I WANT TO CREATE SEONDARY INDEX FOR 2 FIELDS THEN
I NEED TO CREATE A SEPERTE SECONDARY INDEX FOR EACH ONE OF THOSE FIELDS OR ONE SHOULD BE ENOUGH
pLS LET ME KNOW IF IAM WRONG

HI,
If you cannot use the primary index to determine the result set because, for example, none of the primary index fields occur in the WHERE or HAVINGclauses, the system searches through the entire table (full table scan). For this case, you can create secondary indexes, which can restrict the number of table entries searched to form the result set.
You create secondary indexes using the ABAP Dictionary. There you can create its columns and define it as UNIQUE. However, you should not create secondary indexes to cover all possible combinations of fields.
Only create one if you select data by fields that are not contained in another index, and the performance is very poor. Furthermore, you should only create secondary indexes for database tables from which you mainly read, since indexes have to be updated each time the database table is changed. As a rule, secondary indexes should not contain more than four fields, and you should not have more than five indexes for a single database table.
What to Keep in Mind for Secondary Indexes:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/cf/21eb2d446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm
http://www.sap-img.com/abap/quick-note-on-design-of-secondary-database-indexes-and-logical-databases.htm
Regards
Sudheer

Select List (query based LOV) in a wizard created report form

I have created an updatable report form with 3 columns:
app_id
user_id
group_id
Each app_id has multiple group_id's associated with it, and I want to show the group_id field as a Select List (query based LOV) that contains the groups associated with the app_id.
My query for the select list needs to be similar to the following:
SELECT DISPLAY_NAME, GROUP_ID
FROM APPLICATION_GROUPS
WHERE APP_ID = ?????
ORDER BY 1
The problem is, I don't know how to reference the app_id from the main report to replace the ?????.
In other words, if my report returns 2 rows of data like this:
app_id----------user_id----------group_id
1-----------------24------------------3
2-----------------24------------------15
Then how do I get the group_id column to be a select list of possible groups for each application? If app_id 1 has 3 groups associated with it, 3, 4, & 5 and app_id 2 has 2 groups associated with it, 15 & 16, then those each of the select lists should be based on the app_id.
Hopefully I explained this clearly.
Thanks,
Kris

Leo,
Thanks for the response, but I don't think you quite understand my problem. If I go to the Column Attributes screen for the group_id field, I have the "Display As" drop down set to "Select List (query based LOV)", not "Select List (named LOV)". This requires that the sql query be written in the "List of values definition" text area below. Within that text area I have the following query:
SELECT DISPLAY_NAME, GROUP_ID
FROM APPLICATION_GROUPS
WHERE APP_ID = ?????
ORDER BY 1
The APP_ID that I need to reference is for the current row of data that is being processed. Therefore, I can't use a :PNNN_APP_ID variable, because that field does not exist on the page.
Hopefully this explains it a little better.
Thanks,
Kris

Query Based Taxonomies

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for