Query on DSO is taking more time for current month

Hi All,
I have query bulit on DSO is running fine for all the month, but only the problem with ccurrent month. For April is taking more than 15 min to run query though it got less records. For other month is taking less than one sec. Could you help me to resolve the issue.
Regards,
J B

Hi JB,
Same problem we are facing. Last month users ran till from 01.03.2011 to 15.03.2011 around 17.03.2011 even the data volume is less it is running slow or some times not coming. This month it is slow for 01.04.2011 to 11.04.2011 ...
I am also weird, and this is happening after latest patch implementation.I am not exactly sure why it happens.
The fix we have done is restricted in the backend on that date from 01.01.1900 - 31.12.9999 and now allowed filter again on the same date. Now if we use the same date range it is running fine.
Also try if you inpit 01.01.2011 - 31.12.2011 and check the time whether it is running fast or not....it is running normal ...
Regards
vamsi

Similar Messages

Procedure is taking more time for execution

hi,
when i am trying to execute the below procedure it is taking more time for
execution.
can you pls suggest the possaible ways to tune the query.
PROCEDURE sp_sel_cntr_ri_fact (
po_cntr_ri_fact_cursor OUT t_cursor
IS
BEGIN
OPEN po_cntr_ri_fact_cursor FOR
SELET c_RI_fAt_id, c_RI_fAt_code,c_RI_fAt_nme,
     case when exists (SELET 'x' FROM A_CRF_PARAM_CALIB t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
     then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM A_EMPI_ERV_CALIB_DETAIL t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM A_IC_CNTRY_IC_CRF_MPG_DTL t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM A_IC_CRF_CNTRYIDX_MPG_DTL t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM A_IC_CRF_RESI_COR t WHERE t.x_axis_c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM A_IC_CRF_RESI_COR t WHERE t.y_axis_c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM A_PAR_MARO_GAMMA_PRIME_CALIB t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM D_ANALYSIS_FAT t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM D_CALIB_CNTRY_RI_FATOR t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM E_BUSI_PORT_DTL t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM E_CNTRY_LOSS_DIST_RSLT t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM E_CNTRY_LOSS_RSLT t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM E_CRF_BUS_PORTFOL_CRITERIA t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM E_CRF_CORR_RSLT t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM E_HYPO_PORTF_DTL t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
          else
               'No'
     end used_analysis_ind,
     creation_date, datetime_stamp, user_id
     FROM A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT
ORDER BY c_RI_fAt_id_nme DESC;
END sp_sel_cntr_ri_fact;

[When your query takes too long...|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=1812597]

ADF application taking more time for first time and less from second time

Hi Experts,
We are using ADF 11.1.1.2.
Our application contains 5 jsp pages, 10 - 12 taskflows, and 50 jsff pages.
For the first time in the day if we use the application it is taking more than 60 sec on some actions.
And from the next time onwords it is taking 5 to 6 sec.
Same thing is happening daily.
Can any one tell me why this application is taking more time for first time and less time from second time.
Regards
Gayaz

Hi,
If you don't restart you WLS every day, then you should read about Tuning Application Module Pools and Connection Pools
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E15523_01/web.1111/b31974/bcampool.htm#sm0301
And pay attention to the parameter: Maximum Available Size, Minimum Available Size
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E15523_01/web.1111/b31974/bcampool.htm#sm0314
And adjust them to suit your needs.

Self Service Password Registration Page taking more time for loading in FIM 2010 R2

Hi,
I have beeen successfullly installed FIM 2010 R2 SSPR and it is working fine
but my problem is that Self Service Password Registration Page taking more time for loading when i provide Window Credential,it is taking approximate 50 to 60 Seconds for loading a page in FIM 2010 R2
very urgent requirement.
Regards
Anil Kumar

Double check that the objectSid, accountname and domain is populated for the users in the FIM portal, and each user is connected to their AD counterparts
Check here for more info:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/20213.troubleshooting-fim-sspr-error-3003-the-current-user-account-is-not-recognized-by-forefront-identity-manager-please-contact-your-help-desk-or-system-administrator.aspx

Taking more time for retreving data from nested table

Hi
we have two databases db1 and db2,in database db2 we have number of nested tables were there.
Now the problem is we had link between two databases,whenever u firing the any query in db1 internally it's going to acces nested tables in db2.
For feching records it's going to take much more time even records are less in table . what would be the reason.
plz help me daliy we are facing the problem regarding the same

Please avoid duplicate thread :
quaries taking more time
Nicolas.
+< mod. action : thread locked>+

Taking more time for loading Real Cost estimates

Dear Experts,
It is taking more time to load data into cude CO-PC: Product Cost Planning - Released Cost Estimates(0COPC_C09).The update mode is "Full Update"There are only 105607 records.For other areas there are more than this records,but it gets loaded easily.
I have problem only to this 0COPC_C09.Could anybody can guide me?.
Rgds
ACE

suresh.ratnaji wrote:
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
_optimizer_cost_based_transformation string      OFF
filesystemio_options                 string      asynch
object_cache_optimal_size            integer     102400
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.2.0.4
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      choose
optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
plsql_optimize_level                 integer     2
please let me know why it taking more time in INDEX RANGE SCAN compare to the full table scan?Suresh,
Any particular reason why you have a non-default value for a hidden parameter, optimizercost_based_transformation ?
On my 10.2.0.1 database, its default value is "linear". What happens when you reset the value of the hidden parameter to default?

Recover Database is taking more time for first archived redo log file

Hai,
Environment Used :
Hardware : IBM p570 machine with P6 processor Lpar of .5 CPU and 2.5 GB Ram
OS : AIX 5.3 ML 07
Cluster: HACMP 5.4.1.2
Oracle Version: 9.2.0.4 RAC
SAN : DS8100 from IBM
I have used flash copy option to copy the database from production to test machine. Then tried to recover the database to an consistent state using the command "recover automatic database until cancel". System is taking long time and after viewing the alert log it was found that, for the first time, if it is reading all the datafiles and it is taking 3 seconds for each datafile. Since i have more than 500 datafiles, it is nearly taking 25 mins for applying the first archived redo log file. All other log files are applied immeidately without any delay. Any suggession to improve the speed will be highly appreciated.
Regards
Sridhar

After chaning the LPAR settings with 2 CPU and 5GB RAM, the problem solved.

Re : BSP App. taking More Time for Processing

Hi,
   We are using WAS 620 , created a bsp application to create trips thru bdc's.
   In our development system its going fine but in our quality system its taking more that 10 mins for posting.
When we check thru SM04 the icm session and icm req session are there for long time.
   Is there any setting to do with icm for executing bdc's/posting programs.
Looking for help from u all to solve this issue....
Thanks and Regards,
K Vijayasekar.

Check out this weblog to get you started:
/people/mark.finnern/blog/2003/09/24/bsp-in-depth-confusion-between-stateless-stateful-and-authentication

Frontend Query display in Analyzer taking more time

Hi ,
We have severe performance issue with one of Query .
We are using several Hierarchy nodes in query , we have lot of customer exits and query is built on virtual Provider. All these performance issues cannot be ruled out as user is insisting to have them . I tried all suggestions posted in SDN before i am posting this message.
My query is executing fine in RSRT it takes approximately 2 minutes to execute in RSRT , However when i try to execute the same query in Analyzer it takes more than 20 min and work book built on the same query is still worst , It takes 1 hours to display the result.
Kindly suggest me to over come this issue.
Thanks in Advance
Anil

Hi Anil
Please find the link https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/advancedsearch?query=query+performance&cat=sdn_all . It contains various document for query performance and sap notes. Hope this helps.
Also try to restrict your query with variable to improve the performance.
Cheers

ME2O taking more time for execution

This has been found sometime ME2O takes very long time for execution. Please refer the below screen shot for selection.
If you provide the component no, the search time is little less. But still sometimes the execution take more than expected time. This is because SAP standard program search all the deliveries even though these are completed.
There is SAP note:1815460 - ME2O: Selection of delivery very slow. This will help to improve the execution time a lot.
Regards,
Krishnendu.

THanks for sharing this information,

Query using progressive relaxation take more time for execution

HI Gurus,
I am creating a query using context index and progressive relaxation
I had started using progressive relaxation after getting inputs from forum {thread:id=2333942} . Using progressive relaxation takes more than 7 seconds for every query. Is there any way we can improve the performance of the query?
create table test_sh4 (text1 clob,text2 clob,text3 clob);
begin
   ctx_ddl.create_preference ('nd_mcd', 'multi_column_datastore');
   ctx_ddl.set_attribute
      ('nd_mcd',
       'columns',
       'replace (text1, '' '', '''') nd1,
        text1 text1,
        replace (text2, '' '', '''') nd2,
        text2 text2');
   ctx_ddl.create_preference ('test_lex1', 'basic_lexer');
   ctx_ddl.set_attribute ('test_lex1', 'whitespace', '/\|-_+');
   ctx_ddl.create_section_group ('test_sg', 'basic_section_group');
   ctx_ddl.add_field_section ('test_sg', 'text1', 'text1', true);
   ctx_ddl.add_field_section ('test_sg', 'nd1', 'nd1', true);
   ctx_ddl.add_field_section ('test_sg', 'text2', 'text2', true);
   ctx_ddl.add_field_section ('test_sg', 'nd2', 'nd2', true);
end;
create index IX_test_sh4 on test_sh4 (text3)   indextype is ctxsys.context   parameters    ('datastore     nd_mcd   lexer test_lex1 section group     test_sg') ;
alter index IX_test_sh4 REBUILD PARAMETERS ('REPLACE SYNC (ON COMMIT)') ;-- sync index on every commit.
SELECT SCORE(1) score,t.* FROM test_sh4 t WHERE CONTAINS (text3, '
<query>
<textquery>
<progression>
<seq>{GIFT GRILL STAPLES CARD} within text1</seq>
<seq>{GIFTGRILLSTAPLESCARD} within nd1</seq>
<seq>{GIFT GRILL STAPLES CARD} within text2</seq>
<seq>{GIFTGRILLSTAPLESCARD} within nd2</seq>
<seq>((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%)) within text1</seq>
<seq>((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%)) within text2</seq>
<seq>((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES%) or (%GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %CARD%)) within text1</seq>
<seq>((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES%) or (%GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %CARD%)) within text2</seq>
<seq>((%STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %GRILL%) or (%GRILL% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %STAPLES%) or (%GRILL% and %STAPLES%)) within text1</seq>
<seq>((%STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %GRILL%) or (%GRILL% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %STAPLES%) or (%GRILL% and %STAPLES%)) within text2</seq>
<seq>((%GIFT% , %GRILL% , %STAPLES% , %CARD%)) within text1</seq>
<seq>((%GIFT% , %GRILL% , %STAPLES% , %CARD%)) within text2</seq>
<seq>((!GIFT and !GRILL and !STAPLES and !CARD)) within text1</seq>
<seq>((!GIFT and !GRILL and !STAPLES and !CARD)) within text2</seq>
<seq>((!GIFT and !GRILL and !STAPLES) or (!GRILL and !STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !GRILL and !CARD)) within text1</seq>
<seq>((!GIFT and !GRILL and !STAPLES) or (!GRILL and !STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !GRILL and !CARD)) within text2</seq>
<seq>((!STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !GRILL) or (!GRILL and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !STAPLES) or (!GRILL and !STAPLES)) within text1</seq>
<seq>((!STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !GRILL) or (!GRILL and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !STAPLES) or (!GRILL and !STAPLES)) within text2</seq>
<seq>((!GIFT , !GRILL , !STAPLES , !CARD)) within text1</seq>
<seq>((!GIFT , !GRILL , !STAPLES , !CARD)) within text2</seq>
<seq>((?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?STAPLES and ?CARD)) within text1</seq>
<seq>((?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?STAPLES and ?CARD)) within text2</seq>
<seq>((?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?STAPLES) or (?GRILL and ?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?CARD)) within text1</seq>
<seq>((?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?STAPLES) or (?GRILL and ?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?CARD)) within text2</seq>
<seq>((?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?GRILL) or (?GRILL and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?STAPLES) or (?GRILL and ?STAPLES)) within text1</seq>
<seq>((?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?GRILL) or (?GRILL and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?STAPLES) or (?GRILL and ?STAPLES)) within text2</seq>
<seq>((?GIFT , ?GRILL , ?STAPLES , ?CARD)) within text1</seq>
<seq>((?GIFT , ?GRILL , ?STAPLES , ?CARD)) within text2</seq>
</progression>
</textquery>
<score datatype="FLOAT" algorithm="default"/>
</query>',1) >0 ORDER BY score(1) DESC

Progressive relaxation works best when you're only selecting a limited number of rows. If you fetch ALL the rows which satisfy the query, then all the steps in the relaxation will have to run regardless.
If you fetch - say - the first 10 results, then if the first step of the relaxation provides 10 results then there is no need to execute the next step (in fact, due to internal buffering, that won't be exactly true but it's conceptually correct).
The simplest way to do this is reword the query as
SELECT * FROM (
( SELECT SCORE(1) score,t.* FROM test_sh4 t WHERE CONTAINS (text3, '
<query>
<textquery>
</textquery>
<score datatype="FLOAT" algorithm="default"/>
</query>',1) >0 ORDER BY score(1) DESC
WHERE ROWNUM <= 10
You've discovered that leading wild cards don't work too well unless you use SUBSTRING_INDEX. I would encourage you to avoid them altogether if possible, or push them down much lower in the progressive relaxation. Usually, GIFT% is a useful expression (matches GIFTS, GIFTED, etc), %GIFT% is generally no more effective.
There are a lot of steps in your progressive relaxation. It you wanted to reduce the number of steps, you could change:
<seq>((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%)) within text1</seq>
<seq>((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%)) within text2</seq>
to
<seq>((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%)*2) within text1 ACCUM ((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%)) within text2</seq>
I don't know if this would have any performance benefits - but it's worth trying it to see.

Taking more time for job execution

Hi experts,
there is one job executing on daily.
generally it takes around 5 min.
but yesterday it took 50 min.
can anybody tell why it is happened on that particular day

hi,
u cannot tell exactly y it happened.
it depends on several reasons like
1. the server may be down
2. the data may be large
also somtimes even the data is same the time taken will be different.it depends on the load on work process also.if workprocess is free it may finish quickly or it may delay.
u can check workprocess overview in sm50.
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Jun 12, 2008 4:12 PM

Whats the reason for taking more time

Hi,
I'm into production support, previously all loadings are fine from the past one month there is a problem in many infopackages taking more time for same no of records, normal wait time is 1 hr, but it is taking 2 to 3 hrs to complete.
Can any body tell the reasons for this and any resolutions will be a graet help for me.
Thanks in advance.
Siddhu

HI,
Try to analyse those cube for which loading is taking more time by RSRV Transaction especially see whether dimension table size is more than 20% of fact table size.
Another reason might be the Table Space Problem or also ask ur basis guys about the Redolog management , ask whether there is enough space while peak loading is going on....
Assign points if helps....
Regards,
VIjay.

Post Goods Issue (VL06O) - taking more time approximate 30 to 45 minutes

Dear Sir,
While doing post goods issue against delivery document system is taking lots of time, this issue is very very urgent can any one resolved or provide suitable solution for solving this issue.
We creates every day approximate 160 sales order / delivery and goods issue against the same by using transaction code VL06O system is taking more time for PGI.
Kindly provide suitable solution for the same.
Regards,
Vijay Sanguri

Hi
See Note 113048 - Collective note on delivery monitor and search notes related with performance.
Do a trace with tcode ST05 (look for help from a basis consultant) and search the bottleneck. Search possible sources of performance problems in userexits, enhancements and so on.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

Currency translation taking more time at first time in the report

Hi All,
Here is an issue regarding the currency translation in the report. when we click on the currency translation from the contaxt menu on the report, its taking more time for the first time to get the selection options. But it is fast from the second time onwards. It will be not user friendly if its takes more time for the first time. Is there any way to fast up the processing time for the first time when i go for the "currency translation" option at report level for the first time.
let me know why it takes more time for the first time when we go for this option at report level.
Thanks,
Jack

Once again from the top.
This is undoubtedly not a database issue.
I doubt you can fix it in the database.
You can, however, spend a lot of hours asking questions and poking around if you are a consultant paid by the hour.
But as long as you are looking for something to do here are some that won't fix the problem but may be worth a few minutes of your time.
WHERE 1 = 1Are you kidding? Drop this nonsense. The Oracle optimizer is not brain dead. If it were my database I would also drop the parallel hint like a bad habit.
/*+ parallel(rp1, 8) */Again the Oracle optimizer is not brain dead. Ask for parallel threads that don't exist and the database will just queue your SQL and let it sit there until sufficient resources become available.

Query on DSO is taking more time for current month

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for