Query on Rebates/Subsequent settlement

Hi,
The scenario is that Vendor reduces the price of an article.
There is some stock at hand and the vendor is ready to refund the difference.
Eg. Cost price of Cannon Digicam was 400$, now the Vendor reduces the price to 300$. He sends a notofication for this. If the stock at hand (DC stock + Store Stock) is 12 EA, then the vendor is ready to refund us (400-300)*12 = 1200$
How can u map this process in Retail. Currently we find out the Qty at hand using a report and multipy it with the cost difference in an excel and send it to the Vendor as a Rebate amount.
Vendor beleives on us for the Qty at hand.
Thanks
Kanica

Hi,
Yean i knw this. But you are actually not understanding the process.
We dont want to do this whole process of calculating stock on hand, creating rebate, changing MAP to be done one by one manually.
We just want an inetgrated approach where we just key in the new price and say its a vendor price change.. the system automatically calculates the qty on hand, calculates the rebate amount and cretaes a credit memo and also adjusts the moving avg price.
We are curretly doing the whole process manually as i had described... but we are looking for something better.
Cheers
Kanica

Similar Messages

Rebates (Subsequent settlement) settling to Debtor?

Hi,
I currently am trying to configure the MM Subsequent settlement process.
The business does not want to create a credit item on the suppliers account and would prefer to settle the rebate back to the suppliers customer account with us. Is this possible? If so what configuration steps do I need to do and what risks are you aware of doing it this way?
Regards
Alan

You can follow the best practices to configure it at first.
Look for G84 in http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1600/BL_ES/html/index.htm
The procedure is to create the agreement with meb1, adjust the volume with meb4 and in case you need to update volume backwards it is the Meba transaction.
send the news after having checked your configuration with best practices.

Rebate- Subsequent Settlement

I am configuring subsequent settlement scenario. I want to know is there a provision to display rebate value in PO against condition type ( e.g if rebate condition type is A001 can rebate value be displayed against and is PO value calculated considering the rebate ? ) . Currently I can see " 0" against the condition type.

HI,
Please chk in the config....
SPRO>MM->purchasing-->Partner Determination->Partner setting in Rebate Arrangement--->Define partner schemas for Rebate..
Here please check the partner function "PI" is made mandatory...
You can main the Partner function "PI" in the agreement itself...
Goto t-code MEB2 & enter the agreement no, inside click the icon "Agreement Partner" or (Ctrl+F2) and maintain the partner function PI..
find below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/12/08595a470311d1894a0000e8323352/content.htm
Regards
Raj
Edited by: R.Rasumalla on Oct 21, 2011 6:37 PM
Moderator message:
Warning: Copy-pasted answer from someone else's work:
Issue in Vendor Rebate Settlement (ECC 6.0)
Please refrain from doing such things in the future. Please also don't do linkfarming.
Points will be removed.
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Oct 23, 2011 7:54 PM

Subsequent settlement - MM vendor rebate

Dear all,
One of my user-department is going to use the vendor rebate (i.e. subsequent settlement) as there is such business incentive given by a couple of vendor since last year and we would like to capture this in the system to take advantage on this.
However, I would like to check with you on your experience with regards to what kinds of business requirement (i.e. question) to enquire from the business? basically, how to start on the requirement gathering with regards to this Vendor rebate? what kind of question to ask, what are important that must know, staffs like that?
thanks.
MM_user

Dear all,
Does anyone have experince in this area to know my question? thanks.
Tuffy

Subsequent settlement with different volumes (scale and rebate)

Hi
A nice question for you all.
In subsequent settlement I want to do the following:
Interval scales:
>$100.000 -> 1% rebate
>$450.000 -> 2% rebate
>$600.000 -> 3% rebate
(this is easy)
When I want to determine the business volume I want to differentiate between:
- trucks
- cars
Based on the following numbers:
Annual business volume for trucks: $200.000
Annual business volume for cars: $300.000
Total volume: $500.000
This means the rebate wil fall in the 2% interval.
BUT.... the rebate is ONLY for cars and NOT for trucks.
--> 2% of 300.000 = $6.000
How to do this?
Regards,
Arno

Sangeeta,
What do you think of the following:
Build up business volume for every delivery of the supplier and also for the trucks.
I will make two rebates:
For the total volume:
>$100.000 -> -1% rebate
>$450.000 -> -2% rebate
>$600.000 -> -3% rebate
For the trucks volume:
>$100.000 -> +1% rebate
>$450.000 -> +2% rebate
>$600.000 -> +3% rebate
Since the trucks will be in the +1% rate and the total volume will be in the 2% rate I have to change the interval for the scales condition manually in trx MEU2, but not the price condition. After the comparisation is finished both are in the +/- 2% scale and I can settle the agreement.
Only one manual step needed, sounds as a fine solution, do you agree?

Subsequent settlement in MM(Vendor rebate)

I'm using subsequent settlement(rebate) on vendor side with partial settlement with the help of settlement calendar. However during vendor rebate maintenance in step of condition maintenance, I maintained condition rate(rebate discount) and scales on main condition. However system only copied automatically condition rate at main condition to period-specific condition not for scales. So I had to do it manually by copying scales at main condition to individual period-specific conditions. It's quite a tough life to do this. Could anyone give me some light to make life better for example any missing configuration or any enhancement.
Home

Hi,
Use BADI to create rebate agreement in MM.You can explore following BAdI.
These BAdI are applicable for MM & SD applications:
(a) SD_BONUS_CREDIT_NOTE BAdI for Rebate Credit Memo Requirements
(b) SD_COND_DETAIL Enhancement in Condition Detail Screen
(c) SD_COND_SAVE_A Save condition application A, E
I hopr this will help you out. Thanking you.

Subsequent settlement -- Rebate to Vendor

Hi friends,
Thanks for your input for the following issue ahead!
I created an agreement which type is material rebates. Then I ticked the vendors selection "subsequent settlement" and "... configure index" in the vendor master record. Then I run the report "RMEBEIN3" to compile vendor document index. Then I tried to run the report "RWMBON08" to get business volume data, but can't. I created the condition for agreement by "A001" and "A002". And also I check the table "S111" where having some lines for the last period of "2007/12" with the right vendor and material.
The eror message:
It.No. Message     Error Text
       MN    I 381 No update data exists for condition record
       MN    I 531 No subsequent business volume was determined for arrangement 138,
How to check all the other settings?
I tried to add new PO, and then I can get Business Volume, but I can get ones of last year retrospectively!!!
Bruce
Edited by: Bruce Hu on Jan 8, 2008 8:26 AM
Edited by: Bruce Hu on Jan 9, 2008 5:47 AM

You can follow the best practices to configure it at first.
Look for G84 in http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1600/BL_ES/html/index.htm
The procedure is to create the agreement with meb1, adjust the volume with meb4 and in case you need to update volume backwards it is the Meba transaction.
send the news after having checked your configuration with best practices.

Query for the Account Determination of Subsequent Settlement

Hello,
No Accouting Documents are created while settlement run on Settlement Date
Could anyone provide me the Documents for the Configuring the Account Determination for the Subsequent Settlement.
Regards,
Kumar Rayudu

Hi
Plese refer the help.sap.com or the following link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/12/08595a470311d1894a0000e8323352/frameset.htm
Regards
Ramakrishna

Subsequent Settlement

Hi friends,
Please assist here. I have set the settlement type to "debit-side settlement accounting purchase org. level" on the Settlement subscreen of the arrangement type details screen.
This is because i want to award an invoice to vendors.
Now for some reason the arrangement type does now appear from the drop down list when i want to create a rebate argreement via MEB1.
I have also maintained the the BM1 & BM3 document types on the debit-site settlement subscreen.
Can anybody assist me and explain what could be the potential error.
your help will be much appriciated.

Hi,
credit-side settlement works with vendor billing. This is a function from the MM application.
Debit-side settlement works with customer billing, which is a function of the SD application. In this case the subsequent settlement functionality uses customer billing documents to create the settlement.
Please check the note 153694 - Credit-side or debit-side settlement type
Regards,
Edit

Subsequent settlement for multiple material

Hi, everyone,
I have a requirement for subsequent settlement.
The vendor will rebate a fixed amount when the total purchasing QTY more than 100,000 pcs for material A, plus material B, plus material C.
When I create the sebsequent settlement, I can only input the material A, B, C one by one, and the system calculate the business volumn based on the indivdual material also.
The key requirement is the rebate was based on the TOTAL QTY of material A, B, C.
Would you please give me a help? Should I use the settle group in info record? Less document for it.
Thanks!
Tony

Hi ,
rather than going material rebate while selecting rebate arrangement type select grp rebate or rebate to do this proces
regards

Subsequent settlement based on sold volume from the stores

Hello sirs,
We have a requirement that is killing me.
We need to do the subsequent settlement based on the sold volume out from a group of stores instead of the volume bought to the vendor. We need to update the statistics for the purpouse of subsequent settlement in the moment of a sales order not in the purchase order, goods receipt or invoice verification (the standard points).
There is any standard way to do this?
Thank you so much for helping me.
Best regards
Pedro

Hi Pedro,
You can send material to STORES by Sales Order as well as Stock Transport Order from DC.
If you are following STO process, then subsequent settlement will not come in to Picture.
If you are sending materials to Stores by Sales Order, then you can have Subsequent Settlement based on Volume of Business or Qty.
This can be achieved by configuring Rebate Agreement in normal Sales Cycle.
Regards,
Selvakumar. M

Subsequent Settlement - without periodic condition and with calendar

Hey everyone,
I hope you can help me with my issue. We are trying to use the subsequent settlement process for vendor rebate arrangements. We want to use the functionality to extend the rebate arrangement but we don't want to use periodic conditions. The goal is to only make a final settlement each year.
Is this even possible? If I maintain the rebate type and set an arrangement calendar I have to maintain the periodic calendar as well. If I then settle the document, there will always be an empty position in the vendor billing document for the partial setting.
At the moment both calendars are empty and we have to create a complete new rebate arrangement every year.
Thanks and regards
Kai

You can follow the best practices to configure it at first.
Look for G84 in http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1600/BL_ES/html/index.htm
The procedure is to create the agreement with meb1, adjust the volume with meb4 and in case you need to update volume backwards it is the Meba transaction.
send the news after having checked your configuration with best practices.

First query very slow, subsequent queries fine

In our 9i application when we first do a query it is extremely slow. If the database has not been used for sometime. This happens for sure after overnight, but also after an hour or so of inactivity during day.
After the initial query eventually completes, subsequent queries seem fast and no problem. Is just problem with first query.
This does not happen with all data. Just a particular group of data in our database.
any suggestions?
Thanks
John

Hi John !
For mee, it looks like a data cache effect.
A database need to manipulate data and use a data cache to avoid reading/writing data too much.
So if the request don't find data in the cache, the database have to read it from disk and put it in the data cache (for me, your fist request). But if data are already in the cache, there is no need to reed them from disk. So the request time is very far better (for me, following requests).
So if this is a very important problem what can you do ?
- Check your query exec plan and try to need few data reads (avoid full scans tables for exemple...)
- Rise the size of your db cache (check the cache hit ratio (1))
- You can place data permanently in the cache (for table CACHE option) but only if these data sets are small (check dba_segments, [dba_tables after statistics]). If data sets are important, these data can eject other data from cache, so your request time will be good but other requests very bad.
It could be a library cache effect too (same kind of problem: entries are made for querys already parsed, so the same query can avoid a hard parse) if, for exemple, you handle queries with 5,000 bind variables .
You can check the library hit ratio too (2)
To be sure of your problem, I think the best is to trace your request
1) when executed first (cold request)
2) and when executed 4th time (hot request)
Tkprof the two traces and look where is the difference. There is 3 phases: parse, execute and fetch.
Data cache problem is a high fetch, library, high parse. You will also find for your query the state which implies disk reads read (on execution plan)
You can posts here cache query results and times for your 1st request and following requests. Even your trace files, if you want me to check your resolution.
Regards,
Jean-Luc
(1)
Cache hit ratio.
Warning1: calculated from your last startup (so if your last startup is few weeks ago, you need to shutdwon, wait for a good sample of your batches executed, and try the following request)
Warning2: There is no ">98 % is good" and "<90 % is bad". It depends on yours applications. For exemple, if same data is frequently acceded in a transactionnal database, you have rise it as high you can.
But imagine databases for clients and clients who needs their data 1 time a day or a week (database or schema of client information like this very forum [Good exemple because I suspect them to use Oracle databases you know :)]). You can accept to have a high response time, lots of disk reads, and so a HR < 90.
Cache hit ratio :
select round((1-(pr.value/(bg.value+cg.value)))*100,2) cachehit
from v$sysstat pr, v$sysstat bg, v$sysstat cg
where pr.name = 'physical reads'
and bg.name = 'db block gets'
and cg.name = 'consistent gets';
(2)
Same warnings than (1)W1
but not (1)W2: Library HR is generaly higher than cache hit ratio >98
Library cache hit ratio :
select round(sum(pinhits)/sum(pins) * 100,2) efficacite from v$librarycache;

Assign company code for subsequent settlement at Plany level

Hi
I am configuring "MM Subsequent settlement" in IMG
In the step - Assign company code for subsequent settlement at Plany level" , i can not add my purchasing organisation and assign to company code. There is no option for "New entry" in the change mode.
Could you please suggest?
Best regards
Vijay

Hi,
Assignment is only possible or necessary for purchasing organizations to which a company code is not assigned.
SAM

Rebate agreement settlement date

Hi,
I want to see the rebate agreement settlement date. Where can i find it?
It happened in our system that Many closed rebate agreements have agreement status Open, though they were closed long back. We feel some thing might have happened to database & this status field has become blank.
I have close such agreements that have the settlement date. Otherwise, i need to ask business to verify every agreement. Which is simply not possible as there are thousands of agreements of more than 8 yrs are also present in my list..
Thanks for replying it.
Srinivas

Rebate Agreement
- Overview of Condition record(Press f5 button from keybroad)
- Select the condition rates
- Select Rebate payment from menubar - then choose Rebate Document
- Select Final Settlement option and press enter.
- There you can see detials of the final settlement doc for the rebate agreement and you can get settlement date.
You can use Table KOTE , KONV, KOMP.
Further
Table CDPOS
with fields as
- Field OBJECTCLAS as COND_B
- Field VALUE_NEW as C
- Field FNAME as BOSTA-Status of a rebate arrang
- Field CHNGIND as U
Regards
JP

Query on Rebates/Subsequent settlement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for