Query optimization - Query is taking long time even there is no table scan in execution plan

Hi All,
The below query execution is taking very long time even there are all required indexes present. 
Also in execution plan there is no table scan. I did a lot of research but i am unable to find a solution. 
Please help, this is required very urgently. Thanks in advance. :)
WITH cte
AS (
SELECT Acc_ex1_3
FROM Acc_ex1
INNER JOIN Acc_ex5 ON (
Acc_ex1.Acc_ex1_Id = Acc_ex5.Acc_ex5_Id
AND Acc_ex1.OwnerID = Acc_ex5.OwnerID
WHERE (
cast(Acc_ex5.Acc_ex5_92 AS DATETIME) >= '12/31/2010 18:30:00'
AND cast(Acc_ex5.Acc_ex5_92 AS DATETIME) < '01/31/2014 18:30:00'
SELECT DISTINCT R.ReportsTo AS directReportingUserId
,UC.UserName AS EmpName
,UC.EmployeeCode AS EmpCode
,UEx1.Use_ex1_1 AS PortfolioCode
SELECT TOP 1 TerritoryName
FROM UserTerritoryLevelView
WHERE displayOrder = 6
AND UserId = R.ReportsTo
) AS BranchName
,GroupsNotContacted AS groupLastContact
,GroupCount AS groupTotal
FROM ReportingMembers R
INNER JOIN TeamMembers T ON (
T.OwnerID = R.OwnerID
AND T.MemberID = R.ReportsTo
AND T.ReportsTo = 1
INNER JOIN UserContact UC ON (
UC.CompanyID = R.OwnerID
AND UC.UserID = R.ReportsTo
INNER JOIN Use_ex1 UEx1 ON (
UEx1.OwnerId = R.OwnerID
AND UEx1.Use_ex1_Id = R.ReportsTo
INNER JOIN (
SELECT Accounts.AssignedTo
,count(DISTINCT Acc_ex1_3) AS GroupCount
FROM Accounts
INNER JOIN Acc_ex1 ON (
Accounts.AccountID = Acc_ex1.Acc_ex1_Id
AND Acc_ex1.Acc_ex1_3 > '0'
AND Accounts.OwnerID = 109
GROUP BY Accounts.AssignedTo
) TotalGroups ON (TotalGroups.AssignedTo = R.ReportsTo)
INNER JOIN (
SELECT Accounts.AssignedTo
,count(DISTINCT Acc_ex1_3) AS GroupsNotContacted
FROM Accounts
INNER JOIN Acc_ex1 ON (
Accounts.AccountID = Acc_ex1.Acc_ex1_Id
AND Acc_ex1.OwnerID = Accounts.OwnerID
AND Acc_ex1.Acc_ex1_3 > '0'
INNER JOIN Acc_ex5 ON (
Accounts.AccountID = Acc_ex5.Acc_ex5_Id
AND Acc_ex5.OwnerID = Accounts.OwnerID
WHERE Accounts.OwnerID = 109
AND Acc_ex1.Acc_ex1_3 NOT IN (
SELECT Acc_ex1_3
FROM cte
GROUP BY Accounts.AssignedTo
) TotalGroupsNotContacted ON (TotalGroupsNotContacted.AssignedTo = R.ReportsTo)
WHERE R.OwnerID = 109
Please mark it as an answer/helpful if you find it as useful. Thanks, Satya Prakash Jugran

Hi All,
Thanks for the replies.
I have optimized that query to make it run in few seconds.
Here is my final query.
select ReportsTo as directReportingUserId, 
UserName AS EmpName, 
EmployeeCode AS EmpCode,
Use_ex1_1 AS PortfolioCode,
BranchName,
GroupInfo.groupTotal,
GroupInfo.groupLastContact,
case when exists
(select 1 from ReportingMembers RM
where RM.ReportsTo =  UserInfo.ReportsTo
and RM.MemberID <> UserInfo.ReportsTo
) then 0  else UserInfo.ReportsTo end as memberid1,
(select code from Regions where ownerid=109 and  name=UserInfo.BranchName) as BranchCode,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY directReportingUserId) AS ROWNUMBER
FROM 
(select distinct R.ReportsTo, UC.UserName, UC.EmployeeCode,UEx1.Use_ex1_1,
(select top 1 TerritoryName 
from UserTerritoryLevelView
where displayOrder = 6
and UserId = R.ReportsTo) as BranchName,
Case when R.ReportsTo = Accounts.AssignedTo then Accounts.AssignedTo else 0 end as memberid1
from ReportingMembers R
INNER JOIN TeamMembers T ON (T.OwnerID = R.OwnerID AND T.MemberID = R.ReportsTo AND T.ReportsTo = 1)
inner join UserContact UC on (UC.CompanyID = R.OwnerID and UC.UserID = R.ReportsTo )
inner join Use_ex1 UEx1 on (UEx1.OwnerId = R.OwnerID and UEx1.Use_ex1_Id = R.ReportsTo)
inner join Accounts on (Accounts.OwnerID = 109 and Accounts.AssignedTo = R.ReportsTo)
union
select distinct R.ReportsTo, UC.UserName, UC.EmployeeCode,UEx1.Use_ex1_1,
(select top 1 TerritoryName 
from UserTerritoryLevelView
where displayOrder = 6
and UserId = R.ReportsTo) as BranchName,
Case when R.ReportsTo = Accounts.AssignedTo then Accounts.AssignedTo else 0 end as memberid1
from ReportingMembers R
--INNER JOIN TeamMembers T ON (T.OwnerID = R.OwnerID AND T.MemberID = R.ReportsTo)
inner join UserContact UC on (UC.CompanyID = R.OwnerID and UC.UserID = R.ReportsTo)
inner join Use_ex1 UEx1 on (UEx1.OwnerId = R.OwnerID and UEx1.Use_ex1_Id = R.ReportsTo)
inner join Accounts on (Accounts.OwnerID = 109 and Accounts.AssignedTo = R.ReportsTo)
where R.MemberID = 1
) UserInfo
inner join 
select directReportingUserId, sum(Groups) as groupTotal, SUM(GroupsNotContacted) as groupLastContact
from
select distinct R.ReportsTo as directReportingUserId, Acc_ex1_3 as GroupName, 1 as Groups,
case when Acc_ex5.Acc_ex5_92 between GETDATE()-365*10 and GETDATE() then 1 else 0 end as GroupsNotContacted
FROM ReportingMembers R
INNER JOIN TeamMembers T 
ON (T.OwnerID = R.OwnerID AND T.MemberID = R.ReportsTo AND T.ReportsTo = 1)
inner join Accounts on (Accounts.OwnerID = 109 and Accounts.AssignedTo = R.ReportsTo)
inner join Acc_ex1 on (Acc_ex1.OwnerID = 109 and Acc_ex1.Acc_ex1_Id = Accounts.AccountID and Acc_ex1.Acc_ex1_3 > '0')
inner join Acc_ex5 on (Acc_ex5.OwnerID = 109 and Acc_ex5.Acc_ex5_Id = Accounts.AccountID )
--where TerritoryID in ( select ChildRegionID  RegionID from RegionWithSubRegions where OwnerID =109 and RegionID = 729)
union 
select distinct R.ReportsTo as directReportingUserId, Acc_ex1_3 as GroupName, 1 as Groups,
case when Acc_ex5.Acc_ex5_92 between GETDATE()-365*10 and GETDATE() then 1 else 0 end as GroupsNotContacted
FROM ReportingMembers R
INNER JOIN TeamMembers T 
ON (T.OwnerID = R.OwnerID AND T.MemberID = R.ReportsTo)
inner join Accounts on (Accounts.OwnerID = 109 and Accounts.AssignedTo = R.ReportsTo)
inner join Acc_ex1 on (Acc_ex1.OwnerID = 109 and Acc_ex1.Acc_ex1_Id = Accounts.AccountID and Acc_ex1.Acc_ex1_3 > '0')
inner join Acc_ex5 on (Acc_ex5.OwnerID = 109 and Acc_ex5.Acc_ex5_Id = Accounts.AccountID )
--where TerritoryID in ( select ChildRegionID  RegionID from RegionWithSubRegions where OwnerID =109 and RegionID = 729)
where R.MemberID = 1
) GroupWiseInfo
group by directReportingUserId
) GroupInfo
on UserInfo.ReportsTo = GroupInfo.directReportingUserId
Please mark it as an answer/helpful if you find it as useful. Thanks, Satya Prakash Jugran

Similar Messages

  • Calculations in query taking long time and to load target table

    Hi,
    I am pulling approx 45 Million records using the below query in a ssis package which pulls from one DB on one server and loading the results to another target table on the another server. In the select query I have a calculation for 6 columns. The target
    table is trunctaed and loaded every day. Also most of the columns in the source which I used for the calculations is having 0 and it took approximately 1 hour 45 min to load the target table. Is there any way to reduce the load time? Also can I do the calcultions
    after once all the 47 M records loaded during query running and then calculate for the non zero records alone?
    SELECT T1.Col1,
    T1.Col2,
    T1.Col3,
    T2.Col1,
    T2.Col2,
    T3.Col1,
    convert( numeric(8,5), (convert( numeric,T3.COl2) / 1000000)) AS Colu2,
    convert( numeric(8,5), (convert( numeric,T3.COl3) / 1000000)) AS Colu3,
    convert( numeric(8,5), (convert( numeric,T3.COl4) / 1000000)) AS Colu4,
    convert( numeric(8,5),(convert( numeric, T3.COl5) / 1000000)) AS Colu5,
    convert( numeric(8,5), (convert( numeric,T3.COl6) / 1000000)) AS Colu6,
    convert( numeric(8,5), (convert( numeric,T3.COl7) / 1000000)) AS Colu7,
    FROM Tab1 T1 
    JOIN Tab2 T2
    ON (T1.Col1 = T2.Col1)
    JOIN Tab3 T3
    ON (Tab3.Col9 =Tab3.Col9)
    Anand

    So 45 or 47? Nevertheless ...
    This is hardly a heavy calculation, the savings will be dismal. Also anything numeric is very easy on CPU in general.
    But
    convert( numeric(8,5), (convert( numeric,T3.COl7) / 1000000))
    is not optimal.
    CONVERT( NUMERIC(8,5),300 / 1000000.00000 )
    Is
    Now it boils to how to make load faster: do it in parallel. Find how many sockets the machine have and split the table into as many chunks. Also profile to find out where it spends most of the time. I saw sometimes the network is not letting me thru so you
    may want to play with buffers, and packet sizes, for example if OLEDB used increase the packet size two times see if works faster, then x2 more and so forth.
    To help you further you need to tell more e.g. what is this source, destination, how you configured the load.
    Please understand that there is no Silver Bullet anywhere, or a blanket solution, and you need to tell me your desired load time. E.g. if you tell me it needs to load in 5 min I will give your ask a pass.
    Arthur
    MyBlog
    Twitter

  • Query is not executed(takeing long time)

    Hi
    We have aquery(stock statement) on 0ic_c03  when i execute the query it showing error after some time
    Error :
    1)Error while reading data;navigation is possible
    2)query0:runtime error time limit exceded. with parllal processing via RFC
    what is the reason what can i do
    If any one face like this plz suggest me
    Tahnks in advances
    Ogeti

    Hi
    First try to execute the report using the RSRT tcode then you know if is there any problem in the query.
    and check in the data target is there any failed request are there.
    Regards,
    Chandra.

  • This part of query is taking long time to run, its about 40 minutes. Can anyone help wit it.

    ------Load Dataset into Temp table---------------
    SELECT
    z.SYSTEMNAME
    --,Case when ZXC.[Subsystem Name] <> 'NULL' Then zxc.[SubSystem Name]
    --else NULL
    --End AS SubSystemName
    , CASE
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT DISTINCT zxc.TIN
    FROM dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking zxc
    WHERE zxc.[SubSystem Name] <> 'NULL'
    THEN
    (SELECT DISTINCT [Subsystem Name]
    FROM dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking zxc
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = zxc.TIN)
    End As SubSYSTEMNAME
    ,z.PROVIDERNAME
    ,z.STATECODE
    ,z.PROV_TAX_ID
    ,z.SRC_PAR_CD
    ,SUM(z.SEQUEST_AMT) Actual_Sequestered_Amt
    , CASE
    WHEN z.SRC_PAR_CD IN ('E','O','S','W')
    THEN 'Nonpar Waiver'
    --**Amendment Mailed**
    --WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    When EXISTS
    (SELECT DISTINCT b.PROV_TIN
    FROM dbo.SQS_Mailed_TINs_010614 b WITH (NOLOCK )
    where not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t where b.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
    THEN
    (SELECT DISTINCT b.Mailing
    FROM dbo.SQS_Mailed_TINs_010614 b WITH (NOLOCK )
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = b.PROV_TIN
    -- --**Amendment Mailed Wave 3 and 4**
    --WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID In
    When EXISTS
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz WITH (NOLOCK )
    where qz.Mailing = 'Amendment Mailed (3rd Wave)'
    and not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t WITH (NOLOCK ) where qz.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
    THEN 'Amendment Mailed (3rd Wave)'
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz WITH (NOLOCK )
    where qz.Mailing = 'Amendment Mailed (4th Wave)'
    and not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t WITH (NOLOCK ) where qz.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
    THEN 'Amendment Mailed (4th Wave)'
    -- --Is Puerto Rico of Lifesynch
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT DISTINCT a.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM PACT.dbo.SQS_NonPar_PR_LS_TINs a WITH (NOLOCK )
    WHERE a.Bucket <> 'Nonpar'
    THEN
    (SELECT DISTINCT a.Bucket
    FROM PACT.dbo.SQS_NonPar_PR_LS_TINs a WITH (NOLOCK )
    WHERE a.PROV_TAX_ID = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
    -- --**Top Objecting Systems**
    WHEN z.SYSTEMNAME IN
    ('ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM','ASCENSION HEALTH ALLIANCE','AULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION','BANNER HEALTH SYSTEM','BERT FISH MEDICAL CENTER','BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL','BJC HEALTHCARE','BLOUNT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL','BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL','CAROMONT HEALTH SYSTEM','CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES','CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE PARTNERS','CHRISTUS HEALTH',/*'CLEVELAND CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM',*/'COLUMBUS REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM','COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC','COXHEALTH','HCA','HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES','HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM','INTEGRIS HEALTH','JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER','LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM','MARTIN MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM','MERCY','MT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER (MIAMI)','MUNROE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER','NORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM','NORTHSIDE HEALTH SYSTEM','SHANDS HEALTHCARE','SISTERS OF MERCY - SPRINGFIELD, MO','SSM HEALTH CARE','ST LUKES HEALTH SYSTEM','SUMMA HEALTH SYSTEM','SUSQUEHANNA HEALTH SYSTEM','TBD -- TRINITY HEALTH - CATHOLIC HEALTH EAST','UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI HEALTH SYSTEM','UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HOSPITALS','UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH CARE')
    THEN 'Top Objecting Systems'
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h
    INNER JOIN SQS_Provider_Tracking obj WITH (NOLOCK )
    ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Top Objector'
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
    )and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HO','HI')
    THEN 'Top Objecting Systems'
    -- --**Other Objecting Hospitals**
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h
    INNER JOIN SQS_Provider_Tracking obj WITH (NOLOCK )
    ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Objector'
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
    )and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HO','HI')
    THEN 'Other Objecting Hospitals'
    -- --**Objecting Physicians**
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT z.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM SQS_EDW_Source z WITH (NOLOCK)
    WHERE EXISTS
    (SELECT DISTINCT
    obj.TIN
    FROM SQS_Provider_Tracking obj WITH (NOLOCK )
    WHERE obj.[Objector?] in ('Objector','Top Objector')
    and z.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD not IN ('HO','HI')
    THEN 'Objecting Physicians'
    --****Rejecting Hospitals****
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h
    INNER JOIN SQS_Provider_Tracking obj WITH (NOLOCK )
    ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Rejector'
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
    )and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HO','HI')
    THEN 'Rejecting Hospitals'
    --****Rejecting Physciains****
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT obj.TIN
    FROM SQS_Provider_Tracking obj WITH (NOLOCK )
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Rejector')
    and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD NOT IN ('HO','HI')
    THEN 'REjecting Physicians'
    ----**********ALL OBJECTORS SHOULD HAVE BEEN BUCKETED AT THIS POINT IN THE QUERY**********
    -- --**Non-Objecting Hospitals**
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT DISTINCT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h WITH (NOLOCK )
    WHERE
    (z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID)
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
    )and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HO','HI')
    THEN 'Non-Objecting Hospitals'
    -- **Outstanding Contracts for Review**
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [PACT].[HUMAD\ARS3766].[SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz WITH (NOLOCK )
    where qz.Mailing = 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
    AND z.PROV_TAX_ID = qz.PROV_TIN)
    Then 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
    When EXISTS
    (select
    p.prov_tax_id
    from dbo.SQS_CoC_Potential_Mail_List p WITH (NOLOCK )
    where p.amendmentrights <> 'Unilateral'
    AND z.prov_tax_id = p.prov_tax_id)
    THEN 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz WITH (NOLOCK )
    where qz.Mailing = 'More Research Needed'
    AND qz.PROV_TIN = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
    THEN 'More Research Needed'
    WHEN EXISTS (SELECT qz.PROV_TIN FROM [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz WITH (NOLOCK ) where qz.Mailing = 'Objector' AND qz.PROV_TIN = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
    THEN 'ERROR'
    else 'Market Review/Preparing to Mail'
    END AS [Updated Bucket]
    ,COALESCE(q.INDdesc, f.IND_desc) AS INDdesc
    ,f.Time_Period_for_Dispute
    ,f.Renew_Term_Ind
    ,f.Renewal_Date
    ,z.SMG_ID
    ,'' AS OrderedRank
    INTO SQS_Bucketed_Details_SMG_on_SMGXXX
    From #SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG z
    left join #F f ON f.PROV_TAX_ID = z.PROV_TAX_ID
    AND z.SYSTEMNAME = f.SYSTEM_NAME
    AND z.PROVIDERNAME = f.Provider
    Left join #Q q ON z.PROV_TAX_ID = q.TIN
    GROUP BY z.SYSTEMNAME
    --,Z.[SubsystemName]
    ,z.PROVIDERNAME
    ,z.STATECODE
    ,z.PROV_TAX_ID
    ,z.SRC_PAR_CD
    ,q.INDdesc
    ,f.IND_Desc
    ,f.Time_Period_for_Dispute
    ,f.Renew_Term_Ind
    ,f.Renewal_Date
    ,z.SMG_ID
    ,z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD
    As I am a developer I do not have the access to Sql profiler or tuning agent to optimize my query, I have used some joins over the temp table #HIHO which indeed pulling the records from table EDW_Source which has 5 million records, I also added Non clustered
    indexes on prov_ID, SMG_ID and Incurred month for this table, but still it is taking longer time. Need help

    Hi, It needs some more tweaks but pls try this one
    USE
    Go
    --****Create sqs_objector_TINs (Objections and Rejections)****
    --Drop table .dbo.sqs_objector_TINs
    select distinct a.TIN as Prov_TIN
    Into #sqs_objector_TINs
    from .dbo.sqs_provider_tracking as a with (nolock)
    where a.[Objector?] in ('Top Objector','Objector','Rejector')
    /*********** Query for SQS_TINtoSyst***********/
    --DROP TABLE .dbo.SQS_TINtoSystem
    select distinct
    b.SRC_PROV_ID
    --,case
    -- when a.SYSTEM_NAME is null
    -- then
    -- case
    -- when a.CTRCT_GRP_NAME is null
    -- then a.PROV_SMG_NAME
    -- else a.CTRCT_GRP_NAME
    -- end
    -- else a.SYSTEM_NAME
    --end as SYSTEM_NAME
    ,COALESCE(a.SYSTEM_NAME, a.CTRCT_GRP_NAME, a.PROV_SMG_NAME) AS SYSTEM_NAME
    INTO #SQS_TINtoSystem
    from
    PARE.dbo.EDW_PROD_HOSPITAL_MASTER a with (nolock)
    Inner Join PARE.dbo.EDW_PROD_HOSPITAL_ID_XREF b with (nolock)
    on a.SMG_ID = b.SMG_ID
    -- Inner Join .dbo.SQS_EDW_Source q
    --on b.SRC_PROV_ID = q.PROV_TAX_ID
    where b.SRC_PLATFORM_CD = 'TX'
    and exists
    select
    SMG_ID
    from PARE.dbo.EDW_PROD_HOSPITAL_ID_XREF as t1 with (nolock)
    where SRC_PLATFORM_CD = 'TX'
    and exists (select q.PROV_TAX_ID from .dbo.SQS_EDW_Source q with (nolock) where q.PROV_TAX_ID = b.SRC_PROV_ID)
    and a.SMG_ID = t1.SMG_ID
    /************** Query for SQS_Bucketed_Details_SMG*****************/
    DROP TABLE .dbo.SQS_Bucketed_Details_SMG
    --Create temp table
    SELECT z.SYSTEMNAME
    ,Z.PROV_TAX_ID
    ,z.PROVIDERNAME
    ,z.STATECODE
    ,z.SRC_PAR_CD
    ,z.SEQUEST_AMT
    ,case when Z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HI','HO') Then 'H' else 'P' end as Hosp_Ind
    ,Z.SMG_ID
    INTO #SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG
    FROM dbo.SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG z with (nolock)
    WHERE (Z.Incurred_Mth >= convert(datetime,'01/01/2013')) and (Z.Incurred_Mth < convert(datetime, '1/1/2014'))
    --between convert(datetime,'01/01/2013') and convert(datetime, '12/31/2013 23:59:59.996')
    --YEAR(Z.Incurred_Mth)=2013
    -- Create Temp table Q
    select
    x.TIN,
    case when max(x.IND) = 'NYN'
    then 'Standard'
    when max(x.IND) = 'YNN'
    then 'Express'
    when max(x.IND) = 'NNY'
    then 'Non_Standard' else 'Mixed'
    end as INDdesc
    Into #Q
    FROM
    (SELECT
    a.tin,
    MAX(a.express) + MAX(a.StandardInd) + MAX(NonstandardIND) as IND
    from
    (select r.TIN,
    case when MAX(r.Express) like 'Y%' then 'Y' else 'N' end As Express,
    case when MAX(r.Standard) = 'Y' then 'Y' else 'N' end As StandardInd,
    case when MAX(r.[Non-Standard]) = 'Y' then 'Y' else 'N' end AS NonstandardIND
    FROM DBO.SQS_Objectors_01032014 r with (nolock)
    GROUP BY r.TIN) a
    group by a.TIN) x
    group by x.TIN
    --Create Temp table F
    Select *
    INTO #F
    FROM(
    SELECT distinct g.prov_tax_id
    ,g.system_name
    ,g.provider
    ,case when g.reimburse_mixed = 'Y' then 'Mixed'
    when g.reimburse_express = 'Y' then 'Express'
    when g.reimburse_standard = 'Y' then 'Standard'
    when g.reimburse_NonStandard = 'Y' then 'NonStandard'
    end as IND_Desc
    ,g.Time_Period_for_Dispute
    ,case when g.Renewal_Date = 'N' and g.Expiration_Date = 'N'
    then 'Unclear'
    when g.Renewal_Date = 'N' and g.Expiration_Date <> 'N'
    then 'Termination'
    when g.Renewal_Date <> 'N' and g.Expiration_Date = 'N'
    then 'Evergreen'
    when g.Renewal_Date <> 'N' and g.Expiration_Date <> 'N'
    then 'Termination'
    else 'Unknown'
    end as 'Renew_Term_Ind'
    ,g.Renewal_Date
    FROM
    (select distinct
    bb.PROV_TAX_ID1 as prov_tax_id
    ,aa.*
    from
    [dbo].[Top_600_Hospitals3] aa with (nolock)
    left join pare.dbo.EDW_PROD_HOSPITAL_MASTER bb with (nolock)
    on --a.CTRCT_GRP_NAME = b.CTRCT_GRP_NAME
    aa.Provider = bb.PROV_SMG_NAME
    -- and (a.SYSTEM_NAME = b.SMG_SYS_NAME or a.SYSTEM_NAME = b.SYSTEM_NAME)
    --and a.ADDR_LINE1 = b.ADDR_LINE1
    and aa.STATE_CD = bb.STATE_CD
    --and a.ZIP_CD = b.ZIP_CD
    and aa.City1 = bb.CITY_NAME
    where aa.SYSTEM_NAME <> 'SEE ABOVE') g
    where g.system_name <> 'SEE ABOVE') h
    where h.ind_Desc is not null
    SELECT DISTINCT z.PROV_TAX_ID
    , z.SMG_ID
    INTO #HIHO_Records
    FROM SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG z with (nolock)
    WHERE z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HO', 'HI')
    AND Z.Incurred_Mth >=convert(datetime, '1/1/2013') and Z.Incurred_Mth <convert(datetime, '1/1/2014')
    --YEAR(Z.Incurred_Mth)=2013
    ---------------------------------Load Dataset into Temp table---------------
    SELECT
    z.SYSTEMNAME
    --,Case when ZXC.[Subsystem Name] <> 'NULL' Then zxc.[SubSystem Name]
    --else NULL
    --End AS SubSystemName
    , CASE
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT zxc.TIN
    FROM dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking zxc with (nolock)
    WHERE zxc.[SubSystem Name] <> 'NULL'
    THEN
    (SELECT top 1 [Subsystem Name]
    FROM dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking zxc with (nolock)
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = zxc.TIN)
    End As SubSYSTEMNAME
    ,z.PROVIDERNAME
    ,z.STATECODE
    ,z.PROV_TAX_ID
    ,z.SRC_PAR_CD
    ,SUM(z.SEQUEST_AMT) Actual_Sequestered_Amt
    , CASE
    WHEN z.SRC_PAR_CD IN ('E','O','S','W')
    THEN 'Nonpar Waiver'
    -- --Is Puerto Rico of Lifesynch
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT a.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM .dbo.SQS_NonPar_PR_LS_TINs a with (nolock)
    WHERE a.Bucket <> 'Nonpar'
    THEN
    (SELECT top 1 a.Bucket
    FROM .dbo.SQS_NonPar_PR_LS_TINs a with (nolock)
    WHERE a.PROV_TAX_ID = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
    --**Amendment Mailed**
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT b.PROV_TIN
    FROM dbo.SQS_Mailed_TINs_010614 b WITH (NOLOCK )
    where not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t with (nolock) where b.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
    and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P'
    THEN
    (SELECT top 1 b.Mailing
    FROM dbo.SQS_Mailed_TINs_010614 b with (nolock)
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = b.PROV_TIN
    -- --**Amendment Mailed Wave 3-5**
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID In
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz
    where qz.Mailing = 'Amendment Mailed (3rd Wave)'
    and not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t with (nolock) where qz.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
    and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P'
    THEN 'Amendment Mailed (3rd Wave)'
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz
    where qz.Mailing = 'Amendment Mailed (4th Wave)'
    and not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t with (nolock) where qz.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
    and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P'
    THEN 'Amendment Mailed (4th Wave)'
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz
    where qz.Mailing = 'Amendment Mailed (5th Wave)'
    and not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t with (nolock) where qz.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
    and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P'
    THEN 'Amendment Mailed (5th Wave)'
    -- --**Top Objecting Systems**
    WHEN z.SYSTEMNAME IN
    ('ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM','ASCENSION HEALTH ALLIANCE','AULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION')
    THEN 'Top Objecting Systems'
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h
    INNER JOIN .dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking obj with (nolock)
    ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Top Objector'
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
    )and z.Hosp_Ind = 'H'
    THEN 'Top Objecting Systems'
    -- --**Other Objecting Hospitals**
    WHEN (z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h
    INNER JOIN .dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking obj with (nolock)
    ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Objector'
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
    )and z.Hosp_Ind = 'H')
    THEN 'Other Objecting Hospitals'
    -- --**Objecting Physicians**
    WHEN (z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    obj.TIN
    FROM .dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking obj with (nolock)
    WHERE obj.[Objector?] in ('Objector','Top Objector')
    and z.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P')
    THEN 'Objecting Physicians'
    --****Rejecting Hospitals****
    WHEN (z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h
    INNER JOIN .dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking obj with (nolock)
    ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Rejector'
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
    )and z.Hosp_Ind = 'H')
    THEN 'Rejecting Hospitals'
    --****Rejecting Physciains****
    WHEN
    (z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    obj.TIN
    FROM .dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking obj with (nolock)
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Rejector')
    and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P')
    THEN 'REjecting Physicians'
    ----**********ALL OBJECTORS SHOULD HAVE BEEN BUCKETED AT THIS POINT IN THE QUERY**********
    -- --**Non-Objecting Hospitals**
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h
    WHERE
    (z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID)
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL)
    and z.Hosp_Ind = 'H'
    THEN 'Non-Objecting Hospitals'
    -- **Outstanding Contracts for Review**
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz with (nolock)
    where qz.Mailing = 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
    AND z.PROV_TAX_ID = qz.PROV_TIN)
    Then 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
    When z.prov_tax_id in
    (select
    p.prov_tax_id
    from dbo.SQS_CoC_Potential_Mail_List p with (nolock)
    where p.amendmentrights <> 'Unilateral'
    AND z.prov_tax_id = p.prov_tax_id)
    THEN 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz
    where qz.Mailing = 'More Research Needed'
    AND qz.PROV_TIN = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
    THEN 'More Research Needed'
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN (SELECT qz.PROV_TIN FROM [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz with (nolock) where qz.Mailing = 'Objector' AND qz.PROV_TIN = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
    THEN 'ERROR'
    else 'Market Review/Preparing to Mail'
    END AS [Updated Bucket]
    ,COALESCE(q.INDdesc, f.IND_desc) AS INDdesc
    ,f.Time_Period_for_Dispute
    ,f.Renew_Term_Ind
    ,f.Renewal_Date
    ,z.SMG_ID
    ,'' AS OrderedRank
    INTO dbo.SQS_Bucketed_Details_SMG with (nolock)
    From #SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG z
    left join #F f ON f.PROV_TAX_ID = z.PROV_TAX_ID
    AND z.SYSTEMNAME = f.SYSTEM_NAME
    AND z.PROVIDERNAME = f.Provider
    Left join #Q q ON z.PROV_TAX_ID = q.TIN
    GROUP BY z.SYSTEMNAME
    --,Z.[SubsystemName]
    ,z.PROVIDERNAME
    ,z.STATECODE
    ,z.PROV_TAX_ID
    ,z.SRC_PAR_CD
    ,q.INDdesc
    ,f.IND_Desc
    ,f.Time_Period_for_Dispute
    ,f.Renew_Term_Ind
    ,f.Renewal_Date
    ,z.SMG_ID
    ,z.Hosp_Ind
    /************************** Drop temp tables*********************/
    --DROP TABLE #SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG
    --DROP TABLE #Q
    --DROP TABLE #F
    --DROP TABLE #HIHO_Records
    --DROP TABLE #SQS_TINtoSystem
    --DROP TABLE #SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG
    --DROP TABLE #sqs_objector_TINs

  • Query taking long time to run.

    The following query is taking long time to run, is there anything can be done to make it run faster by changing the sql etc.
    select distinct
    A.DEPTID,
    A.POSITION_NBR,
    A.EMPLID,
    A.EMPL_RCD_NBR,
    A.EFFDT,
    B.NAME,
    A.EMPL_STATUS,
    A.JOBCODE,
    A.ANNUAL_RT,
    A.STD_HOURS,
    A.PRIMARY_JOB,
    C.POSN_STATUS,
    case when A.POSITION_NBR = ' ' then 0 else C.STD_HOURS end,
    case when A.POSITION_NBR = ' ' then ' ' else C.DEPTID end
    from PS_JOB A,
    PS_PERSONAL_DATA B,
    PS_POSITION_DATA C
    where A.EMPLID = B.EMPLID
    and
    ((A.POSITION_NBR = C.POSITION_NBR
    and A.EFFSEQ = (select max(D.EFFSEQ)
    from PS_JOB D
    where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
    and D.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
    and D.EFFDT = A.EFFDT)
    and C.POSN_STATUS <> 'G'
    and C.EFFDT = (select max(E.EFFDT)
    from PS_POSITION_DATA E
    where E.POSITION_NBR = A.POSITION_NBR
    and E.EFFDT <= A.EFFDT)
    and C.EFFSEQ = (select max(F.EFFSEQ)
    from PS_POSITION_DATA F
    where F.POSITION_NBR = A.POSITION_NBR
    and F.EFFDT = C.EFFDT))
    or
    (A.POSITION_NBR = C.POSITION_NBR
    and A.EFFDT = (select max(D.EFFDT)
    from PS_JOB D
    where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
    and D.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
    and D.EFFDT <= C.EFFDT)
    and A.EFFSEQ = (select max(E.EFFSEQ)
    from PS_JOB E
    where E.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
    and E.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
    and E.EFFDT = A.EFFDT)
    and C.POSN_STATUS <> 'G'
    and C.EFFSEQ = (select max(F.EFFSEQ)
    from PS_POSITION_DATA F
    where F.POSITION_NBR = A.POSITION_NBR
    and F.EFFDT = C.EFFDT)))
    or
    (A.POSITION_NBR = ' '
    and A.EFFSEQ = (select max(E.EFFSEQ)
    from PS_JOB D
    where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
    and E.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
    and D.EFFDT = A.EFFDT)))

    Using distributive law A and (B or C) = (A and B) or (A and C) from right to left we can have:
    select distinct A.DEPTID,A.POSITION_NBR,A.EMPLID,A.EMPL_RCD_NBR,A.EFFDT,B.NAME,A.EMPL_STATUS,
                    A.JOBCODE,A.ANNUAL_RT,A.STD_HOURS,A.PRIMARY_JOB,C.POSN_STATUS,
                    case when A.POSITION_NBR = ' ' then 0 else C.STD_HOURS end,
                    case when A.POSITION_NBR = ' ' then ' ' else C.DEPTID end
      from PS_JOB A,PS_PERSONAL_DATA B,PS_POSITION_DATA C
    where A.EMPLID = B.EMPLID
       and (
             A.POSITION_NBR = C.POSITION_NBR
         and A.EFFSEQ = (select max(D.EFFSEQ)
                           from PS_JOB D
                          where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
                            and D.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
                            and D.EFFDT = A.EFFDT
         and C.EFFSEQ = (select max(F.EFFSEQ)
                           from PS_POSITION_DATA E
                          where E.POSITION_NBR = A.POSITION_NBR
                            and E.EFFDT = C.EFFDT
         and C.POSN_STATUS != 'G'
         and (
               C.EFFDT = (select max(E.EFFDT) 
                            from PS_POSITION_DATA E
                           where E.POSITION_NBR = A.POSITION_NBR
                             and E.EFFDT <= A.EFFDT
           or
               A.EFFDT = (select max(D.EFFDT) 
                            from PS_JOB D
                           where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
                             and D.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
                             and D.EFFDT <= C.EFFDT
         or
             A.POSITION_NBR = ' '
               and A.EFFSEQ = (select max(E.EFFSEQ)
                                 from PS_JOB D
                                where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
                                  and E.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
                                  and D.EFFDT = A.EFFDT
           )may not help much as the optimizer might have guessed it already
    Regards
    Etbin

  • Query taking long time for EXTRACTING the data more than 24 hours

    Hi ,
    Query taking long time for EXTRACTING the data more than 24 hours please find the query and explain plan details below even indexes avilable on table's goe's to FULL TABLE SCAN. please suggest me.......
    SQL> explain plan for select a.account_id,round(a.account_balance,2) account_balance,
    2 nvl(ah.invoice_id,ah.adjustment_id) transaction_id,
    to_char(ah.effective_start_date,'DD-MON-YYYY') transaction_date,
    to_char(nvl(i.payment_due_date,
    to_date('30-12-9999','dd-mm-yyyy')),'DD-MON-YYYY')
    due_date, ah.current_balance-ah.previous_balance amount,
    decode(ah.invoice_id,null,'A','I') transaction_type
    3 4 5 6 7 8 from account a,account_history ah,invoice i_+
    where a.account_id=ah.account_id
    and a.account_type_id=1000002
    and round(a.account_balance,2) > 0
    and (ah.invoice_id is not null or ah.adjustment_id is not null)
    and ah.CURRENT_BALANCE > ah.previous_balance
    and ah.invoice_id=i.invoice_id(+)
    AND a.account_balance > 0
    order by a.account_id,ah.effective_start_date desc; 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    Explained.
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)|
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 544K| 30M| | 693K (20)|
    | 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 544K| 30M| 75M| 693K (20)|
    |* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 544K| 30M| | 689K (20)|
    |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ACCOUNT | 20080 | 294K| | 6220 (18)|
    |* 4 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 131M| 5532M| 5155M| 678K (20)|
    |* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| ACCOUNT_HISTORY | 131M| 3646M| | 197K (25)|
    | 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| INVOICE | 262M| 3758M| | 306K (18)|
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    2 - access("A"."ACCOUNT_ID"="AH"."ACCOUNT_ID")
    3 - filter("A"."ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID"=1000002 AND "A"."ACCOUNT_BALANCE">0 AND
    ROUND("A"."ACCOUNT_BALANCE",2)>0)
    4 - access("AH"."INVOICE_ID"="I"."INVOICE_ID"(+))
    5 - filter("AH"."CURRENT_BALANCE">"AH"."PREVIOUS_BALANCE" AND ("AH"."INVOICE_ID"
    IS NOT NULL OR "AH"."ADJUSTMENT_ID" IS NOT NULL))
    22 rows selected.
    Index Details:+_
    SQL> select INDEX_OWNER,INDEX_NAME,COLUMN_NAME,TABLE_NAME from dba_ind_columns where
    2 table_name in ('INVOICE','ACCOUNT','ACCOUNT_HISTORY') order by 4;
    INDEX_OWNER INDEX_NAME COLUMN_NAME TABLE_NAME
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 P_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT CUSTOMER_NODE_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_ACCOUNT_TYPE ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_INVOICE INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_PREVIOUS_INVOICE PREVIOUS_INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME_ID ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME_ID ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_LAST_MODIFIED_ACCOUNT LAST_MODIFIED ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_INVOICE_ACCOUNT INVOICE_ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ACCOUNT SEQNR ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_INVOICE INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADINV INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA CURRENT_BALANCE ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_LMOD LAST_MODIFIED ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADINV ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_PAYMENT PAYMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_APPLIED_DT APPLIED_DATE ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 P_INVOICE INVOICE_ID INVOICE
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE CUSTOMER_INVOICE_STR INVOICE
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_LAST_MODIFIED_INVOICE LAST_MODIFIED INVOICE
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID INVOICE
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE_ACCOUNT BILL_RUN_ID INVOICE
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_BILL_RUN BILL_RUN_ID INVOICE
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_INVOICE_TYPE INVOICE_TYPE_ID INVOICE
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_CUSTOMER_NODE CUSTOMER_NODE_ID INVOICE
    32 rows selected.
    Regards,
    Bathula
    Oracle-DBA

    I have some suggestions. But first, you realize that you have some redundant indexes, right? You have an index on account(account_name) and also account(account_name, account_id), and also account_history(invoice_id) and account_history(invoice_id, adjustment_id). No matter, I will suggest some new composite indexes.
    Also, you do not need two lines for these conditions:
    and round(a.account_balance, 2) > 0
    AND a.account_balance > 0
    You can just use: and a.account_balance >= 0.005
    So the formatted query isselect a.account_id,
           round(a.account_balance, 2) account_balance,
           nvl(ah.invoice_id, ah.adjustment_id) transaction_id,
           to_char(ah.effective_start_date, 'DD-MON-YYYY') transaction_date,
           to_char(nvl(i.payment_due_date, to_date('30-12-9999', 'dd-mm-yyyy')),
                   'DD-MON-YYYY') due_date,
           ah.current_balance - ah.previous_balance amount,
           decode(ah.invoice_id, null, 'A', 'I') transaction_type
      from account a, account_history ah, invoice i
    where a.account_id = ah.account_id
       and a.account_type_id = 1000002
       and (ah.invoice_id is not null or ah.adjustment_id is not null)
       and ah.CURRENT_BALANCE > ah.previous_balance
       and ah.invoice_id = i.invoice_id(+)
       AND a.account_balance >= .005
    order by a.account_id, ah.effective_start_date desc;You will probably want to select:
    1. From ACCOUNT first (your smaller table), for which you supply a literal on account_type_id. That should limit the accounts retrieved from ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    2. From ACCOUNT_HISTORY. We want to limit the records as much as possible on this table because of the outer join.
    3. INVOICE we want to access last because it seems to be least restricted, it is the biggest, and it has the outer join condition so it will manufacture rows to match as many rows as come back from account_history.
    Try the query above after creating the following composite indexes. The order of the columns is important:create index account_composite_i on account(account_type_id, account_balance, account_id);
    create index acct_history_comp_i on account_history(account_id, invoice_id, adjustment_id, current_balance, previous_balance, effective_start_date);
    create index invoice_composite_i on invoice(invoice_id, payment_due_date);All the columns used in the where clause will be indexed, in a logical order suited to the needs of the query. Plus each selected column is indexed as well so that we should not need to touch the tables at all to satisfy the query.
    Try the query after creating these indexes.
    A final suggestion is to try larger sort and hash area sizes and a manual workarea policy.alter session set workarea_size_policy = manual;
    alter session set sort_area_size = 2147483647;
    alter session set hash_area_size = 2147483647;

  • Simple query is taking long time

    Hi Experts,
    The below query is taking long time.
    [code]SELECT   FS.*
      FROM   ORL.FAX_STAGE FS
             INNER JOIN
                   ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC
                INNER JOIN
                   GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING GBM
                ON GBM.BU_ID = FSRC.BUID
             ON UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) = UPPER (FS.DESTINATION)
    WHERE       FSRC.IS_DELETED = 'N'
             AND GBM.BU_ID IS NOT NULL
             AND UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS) ='COMPLETED';[/code]
    this query is returning 1645457 records.
    [code]PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    | Id  | Operation           | Name                   | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |                        |   625K|   341M| 45113   (1)|
    |   1 |  HASH JOIN          |                        |   625K|   341M| 45113   (1)|
    |   2 |   NESTED LOOPS      |                        |   611 | 14664 |    22   (0)|
    |   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| FAX_SOURCE             |  2290 | 48090 |    22   (0)|
    |   4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID |     1 |     3 |     0   (0)|
    |   5 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL | FAX_STAGE              |  2324K|  1214M| 45076   (1)|
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Note
       - 'PLAN_TABLE' is old version
    15 rows selected.[/code]
    The distinct number of records in each table.
    [code]SELECT FAX_STATUS,count(*)
    FROM fax_STAGE
    GROUP BY FAX_STATUS;
    FAX_STATUS    COUNT(*)
    BROKEN          10
    Broken - New    9
    Completed    2324493
    New             20
    SELECT is_deleted,COUNT(*)
    FROM  FAX_SOURCE
    GROUP BY IS_DELETED;
    IS_DELETED COUNT(*)
    N         2290
    Y         78[/code]
    Total number of records in each table.
    [code]SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC-- 2368
    SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ORL.FAX_STAGE--2324532
    SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS_GLOBAL.GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING--9
    [/code]
    To improve the performance of this query I have created the following indexes.
    [code]Functional based index on UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) ,UPPER (FS.DESTINATION) and UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS).
    Bitmap index on FSRC.IS_DELETED.
    Normal Index on GBM.BU_ID and FSRC.BUID.
    [/code]
    But still the performance is bad for this query.
    What can I do apart from this to improve the performance of this query.
    Please help me .
    Thanks in advance.

    <I have created the following indexes.
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_DESTINATION_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(UPPER("DESTINATION"))
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_FAX_STATUS_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(LOWER("FAX_STATUS"))
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_UPPER_FAX_STATUS_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(UPPER("FAX_STATUS"))
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_BUID_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(BUID)
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_FAX_NUMBER_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(UPPER("FAX_NUMBER"))
    CREATE BITMAP INDEX ORL.IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(IS_DELETED)
    After creating the following indexes performance got improved.
    But our DBA said that new BITMAP index at FAX_SOURCE table (ORL.IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM) can cause locks
    on multiple rows if IS_DELETED column is in use. Please proceed with detailed tests.
    I am sending the explain plan before creating indexes and after indexes has been created.
    SELECT  FS.*
    FROM  ORL.FAX_STAGE FS
                    INNER JOIN
                    ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC
                  INNER JOIN
                      GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING GBM
                    ON GBM.BU_ID = FSRC.BUID
                ON UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) = UPPER (FS.DESTINATION)
    WHERE      FSRC.IS_DELETED = 'N'
              AND GBM.BU_ID IS NOT NULL
              AND UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS) =:B1;
    --OLD without indexes
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 3076973749
    | Id  | Operation          | Name                  | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time    |
    |  0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |                        |  141K|    85M| 45130  (1)| 00:09:02 |
    |*  1 |  HASH JOIN          |                        |  141K|    85M| 45130  (1)| 00:09:02 |
    |  2 |  NESTED LOOPS      |                        |  611 | 18330 |    22  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| FAX_SOURCE            |  2290 | 59540 |    22  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID |    1 |    4 |    0  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  5 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL | FAX_STAGE              | 23245 |    13M| 45106  (1)| 00:09:02 |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
      1 - access(UPPER("FSRC"."FAX_NUMBER")=UPPER("FS"."DESTINATION"))
      3 - filter("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
      4 - access("GBM"."BU_ID"="FSRC"."BUID")
          filter("GBM"."BU_ID" IS NOT NULL)
      5 - filter(UPPER("FS"."FAX_STATUS")=SYS_OP_C2C(:B1))
    21 rows selected.
    --NEW with indexes.
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 665032407
    | Id  | Operation                        | Name                    | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time    |
    |  0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |                          |  5995 |  3986K|  3117  (1)| 00:00:38 |
    |*  1 |  HASH JOIN                      |                          |  5995 |  3986K|  3117  (1)| 00:00:38 |
    |  2 |  NESTED LOOPS                  |                          |  611 | 47658 |    20  (5)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  3 |    VIEW                          | index$_join$_002        |  2290 |  165K|    20  (5)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  4 |    HASH JOIN                    |                          |      |      |            |      |
    |*  5 |      HASH JOIN                  |                          |      |      |            |      |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    |  6 |      BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS|                          |  2290 |  165K|    1  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  7 |        BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE | IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM      |      |      |            |      |
    |  8 |      INDEX FAST FULL SCAN      | IDX_BUID_RAM            |  2290 |  165K|    8  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  9 |      INDEX FAST FULL SCAN        | IDX_FAX_NUMBER_RAM      |  2290 |  165K|    14  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 10 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN              | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID  |    1 |    4 |    0  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  11 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID    | FAX_STAGE                | 23245 |    13M|  3096  (1)| 00:00:38 |
    |* 12 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN              | IDX_UPPER_FAX_STATUS_RAM |  9298 |      |  2434  (1)| 00:00:30 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
      1 - access(UPPER("DESTINATION")="FSRC"."SYS_NC00035$")
      3 - filter("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
      4 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
      5 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
      7 - access("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
      10 - access("GBM"."BU_ID"="FSRC"."BUID")
          filter("GBM"."BU_ID" IS NOT NULL)
      12 - access(UPPER("FAX_STATUS")=SYS_OP_C2C(:B1))
    31 rows selected
    Please confirm on the DBA comment.Is this bitmap index locks rows in my case.
    Thanks.>

  • CDHDR table query taking long time

    Hi all,
    Select query from CDHDR table is taking long time,in where condition i am giving OBJECTCLASS = 'MAT_FULL' udate = sy-datum and langu = 'EN'.
    any suggestion to improve the performance.i want to select all the article which got changed on current date
    regards
    shibu

    This will always be slow for large data volumes, since CDHDR is designed for quick access by object ID (in this case material number), not by date.
    I'm afraid you would need to introduce a secondary index on OBJECTCLAS and UDATE, if that query is crucial enough to warrant the additional disk space and processing time taken by the new index.
    Greetings
    Thomas

  • Sap bi--query taking long time to exexute

    Hi
    When i try  run the bex query ,its taking long time,please suggest
    Thanks
    sreedhar

    Hi
    When i try  run the bex query ,its taking long time,please suggest
    Thanks
    sreedhar

  • Hi in my sql query i applied like condition (like '%TEST') but it is taking long time

    Hi in my sql query i applied like condition (like '%TEST') but it is taking long time. I applied indexes also,but still i'm facing the same problem. In my databse nearly 2,00,000 records their.

    Hi Manikandan
    Is there a difference in performance between running the query in BEx and WebI?
    have you aggregates in place on the BEx side of things?
    When you say its taking too long to open the report, have you a variable screen coming up for the report and is that what is taking the time or is it the report execution.
    With regards
    Gill

  • SSRS Reports taking long time to load

    Hello,
    Problem : SSRS Reports taking long time to load
    My System environment : Visual Studio 2008 SP1  and SQL Server 2008 R2
    Production Environment : Visual Studio 2008 SP1  and SQL Server 2008 R2
    I have created a Parameterized report (6 parameters), it will fetch data from 1 table. table has 1 year and 6 months data,      I am selecting parameters for only 1 month (about 2500 records). It is taking almost 2 minutes and 30 seconds
    to load the report.
    This report running efficiently in my system (report load takes only 5 to 6 seconds) but in
    production it is taking 2 minutes 30 seconds.
    I have checked the Execution log from production so I found the timing for
    Data retrieval (approx~)       Processing (approx~)               Rendering (approx~)
    10 second                                      15 sec                        
                2 mins and 5 sec.
    But Confusing point is that , if I run the same report at different time overall output time is same (approx) 2 min 30 sec but
    Data retrieval (approx~)       Processing (approx~)                Rendering (approx~)
    more than 1 min                            15 sec                                     
    more than 1 min
    so 1 question why timings are different ?
    My doubts are
    1) If query(procedure to retrieve the data) is the problem then it should take more time always,
    2) If Report structure is problem then rendering will also take same time (long time)
    for this (2nd point) I checked on blog that Rendering depends on environment structure e.g. Network bandwidth, RAM, CPU Usage , Number of users accessing same report at a time.
    So I did testing of report when no other user working on any report But failed (same result  output is 2 min 30 sec)
    From network team I got the result is that there is no issue or overload in CPU usage or RAM also No issue in Network bandwidth.
    Production Database Server and Report server are different (but in same network).
    I checked that database server the SQL Server is using almost Full RAM (23 GB out of 24 GB)
    I tried to allocate the memory to less amount up to 2GB (Trial solution I got from Blogs) but this on also failed.
    one hint I got from colleague that , change the allocated memory setting from static memory to dynamic to SQL Server
    (I guess above point is the same) I could not find that option Static and Dynamic memory setting.
    I did below steps
    Connected to SQL Server Instance
    Right click on Instance go to properties, Go to Memory Tab
    I found three options 1) Server Memory   2) Other memory   3) Section for "Configured values and Running values"
    Then I tried to reduce Maximum  Server memory up to 2 GB (As mentioned above)
    All trials failed, this issue I could not find the roots for this issue.
    Can anyone please help (it's bit urgent).

    Hi UdayKGR,
    According to your description, your report takes too long to load on your production environment. Right?
    In this scenario, since the report runs quickly in developing environment, we initially think it supposed to be the issue on data retrieval. However, based on the information in execution log, it takes longest time on rendering part. So we suggest you optimize
    the report itself to reduce the time for rendering. Please refer to the link below:
    My report takes too long to render
    Here is another article about overall performance optimization for Reporting Services:
    Reporting Services Performance and Optimization
    If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
    Best Regards,
    Simon Hou

  • Nested joins taking long time

    Hi Experts,
    Select query is taking long time execution.
    *- Get the Goods receipts  mainly selected per period (=> MKPF secondary
      SELECT mseg~ebeln mseg~ebelp mseg~werks
             ekko~bukrs ekko~lifnr ekko~zterm ekko~ekorg ekko~ekgrp
             ekko~inco1 ekko~exnum
             lfa1~name1 lfa1~land1 lfa1~ktokk lfa1~stceg
             mkpf~mblnr mkpf~mjahr mseg~zeile mkpf~bldat mkpf~budat
             mseg~bwart
    *Start of changes for CIP 6203752 by PGOX02
             mseg~smbln
    *End of changes for CIP 6203752 by PGOX02
             ekpo~matnr ekpo~txz01 ekpo~menge ekpo~meins
             ekbe~menge ekbe~dmbtr ekbe~wrbtr ekbe~waers
             ekpo~lgort ekpo~matkl ekpo~webaz ekpo~konnr ekpo~ktpnr
             ekpo~plifz ekpo~bstae
             INTO corresponding fields of TABLE it_temp
    *--Begin of modification
    *    FROM mkpf JOIN mseg ON mseg~mblnr EQ mkpf~mblnr
         FROM mkpf INNER JOIN mseg ON mseg~mandt EQ mkpf~mandt
                           and  mseg~mblnr EQ mkpf~mblnr
    *--End of modification
                           AND mseg~mjahr EQ mkpf~mjahr
                  JOIN ekbe ON ekbe~ebeln EQ mseg~ebeln
                           AND ekbe~ebelp EQ mseg~ebelp
                           AND ekbe~zekkn EQ '00'
                           AND ekbe~vgabe EQ '1'
                           AND ekbe~gjahr EQ mseg~mjahr
                           AND ekbe~belnr EQ mseg~mblnr
                           AND ekbe~buzei EQ mseg~zeile
                  JOIN ekpo ON ekpo~ebeln EQ ekbe~ebeln
                           AND ekpo~ebelp EQ ekbe~ebelp
                  JOIN ekko ON ekko~ebeln EQ ekpo~ebeln
                  JOIN lfa1 ON lfa1~lifnr EQ ekko~lifnr
              WHERE mkpf~budat IN so_budat
          AND mkpf~bldat IN so_bldat
          AND mkpf~vgart EQ 'WE'
          AND mseg~bwart IN so_bwart
          AND mseg~matnr IN so_matnr
          AND mseg~werks IN so_werks
          AND mseg~lifnr IN so_lifnr
          AND mseg~ebeln IN so_ebeln
          AND ekko~ekgrp IN so_ekgrp
          AND ekko~bukrs IN so_bukrs
          AND ekpo~matkl IN so_matkl
          AND ekko~bstyp IN so_bstyp
          AND ekpo~loekz EQ space
          AND ekpo~plifz IN so_plifz.
    in st05 it is showing MKPF is taking more time. Need ur sugesstions need ur help
    Moderator message - Please use code tags to format your code
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Feb 5, 2010 9:21 AM

    Hi,
    your result set is quite big.
    20296 records in 283,5 seconds (13,9 ms per record) might not be optimal
    but definatelly the big result set will take time to execute, since you are reading data from 6 tables:
    SELECT
    FROM mkpf
    JOIN mseg ON u2026
    JOIN ekbe ON u2026
    JOIN ekpo ON u2026
    JOIN ekko ON u2026
    JOIN lfa1 ON u2026
    what run time do you expect?
    In case we would be able to get one record in 5ms it will still run more than 100 seconds.
    Generally: Limit the result set as far as possible (with where conditions), select only the columns that are really needed.
    Geneal nested loop join optimization:
    check if the optimizer chooses the table that has the smallest result set (take all where conditions for each table
    and use SE16 to count the result sets, the smallest one should be the start for the nested loop join.
    For the starting table the selective where condition fields (those the limit the result set significantly for that table) should be indexed.
    For other tables the join condition (and maybe additional selecitve where conditions for this table) should be indexed. but most likely you will join to the tables using the primary key which is indexed... .
    Kind regards,
    Hermann

  • Connecting to the database taking long time to connect database server

    Hi
    When I execute procedure i am getting the below message at bottom of the Oracle SQL Developer
    "Connecting to the database"
    it is taking more than 10 min plz guide

    Hi
    have you installed a normal Oracle Client also on your Host? normal Oracle Client
    Did you connect with host:port:sid or with a Oracle Naming Service? through TNS Service
    Can you test tnsping <alias> yes, It is working fine
    Did other user have the same problem? yes
    Did you connect through WAN or LAN connection? LAN (Intranet)
    Can you tell more about you client/database setup?
    Database setup:
    OS: Window 2008 server
    version: 11.1.0
    Client: 11.1.0
    OS: Window 2008 server
    Now I am not able to execute single select query which table contains 6 records and 15 columns it is taking long time I have waited 30 min still no resutls
    only one table is behaving like this remaining is working fine
    Edited by: user9235224 on Oct 6, 2012 7:06 PM

  • F4 Help is taking long time

    Hi All,
    We are working on BI 7.0. version
    In the varaible pop-up screen we have two info objects.
    1. Fiscal year Period
    2. JOA(Joint operating aggriment)
    If u press F4 for JOA, it is taking long time to execute and finally the application is getting closed.same situation is there in RSRT also.
    If i enter with out JOA the query is giving the output. Here i have to restrict the query by JOA.
    i have changed the JOA peroperties in query designer.
    Query execution for filter value selection = Values in master data table.......
    but still the situation is the same.......
    Could you please suggest any solution for this.....
    Thanks & Regards,
    PK

    Hi Kamal,
    You can set that at the query level in the query designer for each query.
    1. Select the corresponding characteristic in the query designer.
    2. Goto to the "Extended tab" in the properties
    3. Select the "Values in the Master data table" in the "Query execution in the filter value selection.
    Also see some recomendations:
    Note 748623 - Input help (F4) has a very long runtime - recommendations
    Hope this helps.
    CK

  • Update ztable is taking long time

    Hi All,
    i have run the 5 jobs with the same program at a time but when we check the db trace
    zs01 is taking long time as shown below.here zs01 is having small amount of data.
    in the below dbtrace for updating zs01 is taking 2,315,485 seconds .how to reduce this?
    HH:MM:SS.MS Duration     Program   ObjectName  Op.   Curs   Array   Rec     RC     Conn     
    2:36:15 AM     2,315,485     SAPLZS01  ZS01       FETCH  294     1     1     0     R/3     
    The code as shown below
    you can check the code in the program SAPLZS01 include LZS01F01.
    FORM UPDATE_ZS01.
    IF ZS02-STATUS = '3'.
        IF Z_ZS02_STATUS = '3'.            "previous status is ERROR
          EXIT.
        ELSE.
          SELECT SINGLE FOR UPDATE * FROM  ZS01
                 WHERE  PROC_NUM    = ZS02-PROC_NUM.
          CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0.
          ADD ZS02-MF_AMT TO ZS01-ERR_AMT.
          ADD 1           TO ZS01-ERR_INVOI.
          UPDATE ZS01.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    my question is when updating the ztable why it is taking such long time,
    how to reduce the time or how to make faster to update the ztable .
    Thanks in advance,
    regards
    Suni

    Try the code like this..
    data: wa_zs01 type zs01.
    FORM UPDATE_ZS01.
    IF ZS02-STATUS = '3'.
        IF Z_ZS02_STATUS = '3'.            "previous status is ERROR
          EXIT.
        ELSE.
          SELECT SINGLE FOR UPDATE * FROM  ZS01
                 WHERE  PROC_NUM    = ZS02-PROC_NUM.
    -- change
      CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0.
          ADD ZS02-MF_AMT TO wa_ZS01-ERR_AMT.
          ADD 1           TO wa_ZS01-ERR_INVOI.
          UPDATE ZS01 from wa_zs01.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    And i think this Select query for ZS01 is inside the ZS02 SELECT statement,
    This might also make slow process.
    If you want to make database access always use Workarea/Internal table to fetch the data
    and work with that.
    Accessing database like this or with Select.... endselect is an inefficient programming.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Urgent help ALV report

    HI, report zhr2. tables:pernr. type-POOLs:slis. INFOTYPES:0001,0004,0041. data: begin of itab,       pernr type pernr-pernr,       MASSN type p0000-MASSN,       STAT2 type p0000-STAT2,       STAT3 type p0000-STAT3,       PLANS type p0001-plans,      

  • ITunes 7 Help: No longer able to import new songs onto iPod

    Hello, I'm experiencing a bad problem that is completely preventing me from adding new songs to my iPod. This problem started when I got the new iTunes 7. Whenever I connect my iPod and drag and drop the songs, it would appear as if iTunes is importi

  • Multiple state objects

    Hello indesigners. I have a made a multiple state object,its working well in swf,but its not responding to adobe interactive pdf, i was just wandering since its a pdf interactive shouldnt it work?or are multiple state objects onyl for swf files. than

  • Error 2330 on Itunes 8 install on vista log attatched... I need some help

    I can't tell if this is quicktime or itunes, but I really could use some help here. I think I have spent 10 hours trying various fixes on this. Does anyone know of a fix? these are some of the errors in the log MSI (c) (18:00) [16:20:51:016]: PROPERT

  • Mac Mini wakes up from standby automatically

    Hi, My Mac Mini wakes up from standby automatically. Waking up via network is disabled and I use an Airport Extreme, a USB mouse (not from Apple) and a wireless Apple keyboard. OS X version is 10.5.8. I have the Mac Mini since about 10 months now. Al