Query Regarding With holding tax deducted

Hi,
Hi,
I am facing one problem with With Holding Tax deduction.
Let us explaining with example: 
1)  Ist I passed one entry through T.Code: f-48 then deducted some TDS (Rs. 5000/- down payment).
2) IInd I passed one invoice T.Code:  f-43 then deducted TDS (Invoice amount Rs. 10000/- but tds base amount entered Rs. 5000/-).
Here above I passed two entries and deducted total amount of TDS. 
3) While at the time of balance amount payment T.Code:  F-53 again system will deduct TDS. 
I am facing problem here. Why system is again deduct TDS at the time of balance payment.  Already balance amount of TDS duducted at time of Invoice.
Please suggest.
Regards
Srinivas Gundala

Hi,
If i am not wrong, the system is reverseing the deduction it has made at the time of adv payment.
Its not deducting again.
Consolidate all the three documents -
- Adv pay
- Inv
- Payment
and you would appreciate the beauty of the concept.
Cheers
Raghu

Similar Messages

  • Regarding With holding tax with CIN version

    Hello SAP gurus
    I've done all the configuration required for the extended withholding tax type-also have updated the tax type and code in the vendor master.
    How to configure automatic surcharge & education cess., With holding tax certificate . What is business place in tds.How to create remittance challan for tds.what is clearing of invoice against down payment.How to create Annual returns of tds.
    While making tds entry with miro, systeam taking dummy profit center.
    So what does configuration required for above error.
    I will assign full points
    Regards
    Divya

    Hi,
    If i am not wrong, the system is reverseing the deduction it has made at the time of adv payment.
    Its not deducting again.
    Consolidate all the three documents -
    - Adv pay
    - Inv
    - Payment
    and you would appreciate the beauty of the concept.
    Cheers
    Raghu

  • With holding tax deducting at the time of APP

    Hi,
    I configured the WHT of payment and Invoice and assigned the same to the vendor. I made the WHT base as manual and posted the amount manually both at the time of down payment and at the time of invoice.. But the system is again deducting the TDS while I am making the payment to vendor through APP. Could you please explain what settings I have to do in order to not to deduct TDS at the time of APP
    Advance Thanks
    Koteswara Rao

    Hi,
    It is not nullifying it is deducting again at the time of payment.
    At the time of advance payment
    Vendor a/c Dr 5000
    To TDS             100
    To Bank           4900
    At the time of invoice posting ( invoice is for 10000)
    Exp A/c dr            10000
    To TDS  on 5000       100
    To Vendor              9900
    When I am tryingto make the payment of balance 5000 through APP it is deducting again 100/- and paying only 4900 to vendor.. Hope this is clear and please now tell me what the problem

  • Regarding the Grossing up Method for With holding Tax

    Hi
    I am implementing SAP ECC 6.0. I am having a specific requirement with regard to With holding TAX. If i configure the WT, the tax amount will be deducted from the invoice & posted to a separate GL account. But in My case, the WT amount should be posted to a GL Account and the amount should not be deducted from the vendor account.
    This arises in case of foreign payments

    Try following this guide for Defining Withholding Tax Formulas
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/7b/5d823ae35c3769e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    and this one Defining Withholding Tax Types and Withholding Tax Codes
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/8e/5a823a89569e68e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    This may help you!

  • With holding tax decuction from T.Code F-02 with out sp. gl indicator

    Hi All,
    While making the payt to service vendor my client do not want to use the functionality of advance payt, which can be performed through T.code F-48. They wants to treat this advance payt as a normal payt to vendor but they want to deduct the with holding tax from this payt.
    I have tries to use T.code F-02 with posting keys 25 Dr Vendor & 50 cr Bank. But when i am using this posting key for vendor (i.e.25) System gives me warning message saying with holding tax information is ignored & system do not deduct TDS from the payt made to vendor.
    But when i am using PK 29 with sp gl indicator A for advances from T.Code F-02 system allows me to deduct the with holding tax against vendor paytment.
    Please guide me how to duduct the with holding tax from vendor payt. without using sp. GL indicator for advances.
    Thanks
    Sonal

    Hi
    why ur clien not want advance paymeny through Special GL, what is the issue/purpose
    see TDS deducted at the time of Advance payment and at the time of invoice
    when u use F-02 for TDS deduct of vendor without using special GL and u useing 25 vendor and 50 bank
    in this case tds not deducted here vendoir is debit but withouse advance indicator
    becuase u given vendor advance , but in this case entry not showing advance or
    in SAP Standard system TDS deducted of advance payment when u using 29 posting key for vendor this is stsndard key of advance vendor
    so convience ur clien u use Advance payment method with Special GL, if they not agree then ask what is the purpose u not using Speacial GL through Advance paument
    if any query, revert back
    Regards
    Roobal

  • With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

    Hi Friends,
    We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
    Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
    As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
    With holding tax rate is 0%,
    Based on modified net amount calculation
    and
    Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
    When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
    Which causes difference in 1099 – misc vendors
    Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
    Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
    Payment going out=
    $1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 – 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
    With holding base calculation =
    $ 1000 – 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
    Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 – 900 = 8.98
    Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
    Moreover, please tell me if it’s normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
    Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
    Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

    Dear All
    i am also having the same problem. The example is
    Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
    Input Tax @ 15%   = $  15,000
    Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
    Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
    On payment the system behavior should be
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325  ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
    However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220  ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
    this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
    Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
    Regards
    Bilal Athar

  • Optional With holding tax for a vendor

    Dear All,
    I want to make the with holding tax optional during MIRO.
    I have already assign the tax code in vendor master and so it automatically deduct withholding tax.
    But my vendor is a supplier as well as a broker for me. So when i want to pay him Brokerage I want automatic tax deduction which is happening but when i want to pay him for the material which he supplied to me also the tax get automatically deducted.
    Can any body help me on this?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Rakesh

    Hi Milind
    Appreciate your prompt response, I am looking for information on what needs to be done for implementing with holding tax for Puerto Rico, May be I was wrong when I said I could not find any links on this subject either in SAP Help or else where. What I could not find was Information specific to Puerto Rico withholding tax. We normally have lots of information on WithHolding tax in SAP help and else where on the net.
    I am looking for information specific to WithHolding tax for Puerto Rico.
    Regards
    KIM Khan

  • With Hold Tax formula..(if any condition required to applied)

    Dear Experts,
    Formula where we will put in the wealth tax? In case company is required to pay rent. Up to Rs. 20000 need not required to deduct the tax?
    or
    TDS required to deduct in professionals only if professional charges exceed Rs.20000.
    For this purpose where we define the formula?
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards,
    Venkat

    Hi
    There are multiple ways to look at it:
    1. In the path specified in the previous post, for a combination of With Holding Tax Type and Code, you can define the amounts and the rates. For eg, under 194C, there is a tax Type CI and Tax Code C1. Now in this you need to deduct TDS @ 2% upto Rs 20000 and TDS @ 10% above Rs 20000. So in the formulae, you can maintain the following configuration
    Tax Type Tax Code    Base Amount Upto     Percentage
    CI               C1              20000                            2
    CI               C1               999999999                   10
    However, there are certain issues here:
    a, There is no provision for validity dates and place to maintain exemption nos
    b. For different vendors you may have differentials rates from IT. In that case you may need multiple tax codes to take care of specific rates.
    2. You can use a BADI to write your own custom logic. The BADI is FQST_CIN_WITHITEM
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

  • With holding tax report with material and qty fields

    Dear All,
    Is there any standard report available with with holding tax data with material and qty fields.
    Thanks,
    Sekhar.

    dear Friend,
    Withholding tax will deduct on services. Hence Material and quantity is not relavent.
    There is no report is available also.
    reg
    Madhu M

  • With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001

    Hi Guru's,
      I have an issue, is there any impact to change the withholding tax base amount 20% instead of 10%.When I change the base amount to 20% and post a document system return error message
    "With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001".Guide me on this issue.
    And tell me the impact of previous open item documents.
    Regards
    Maruthi.

    Thanks for all,
      MY problem solved.
    Regards
    Maruthi

  • Calculation of with holding tax

    The requirement goes like this.
    We have to first remove the with holding tax data from the vendor master.
    And created 1 KR(amount : 1000) & 1 RE(amount : 2000) document type.Also we posted both the above invoice documents in one Z1 clearing document.
    Then add the with holding tax information in vendor master.
    Then we executed the report RFWT0020 for that vendor and the document number.Its updating WITH_ITEM table with only the KR total(1000) under WT_QSSHH field.Its not considering RE total.
    I debugged the program RFWT0020 and found a function module FI_WT_GET_P_WITH_ITEM which performs the with holding tax calculation.When i checked the function module,its fetching from global memory.
    Is there any user exit or BADI for this.We are using 4.7 version.
    Please suggest how can i update the correct with holding tax amount in WITH_ITEM table.

    Hi,
    i´ve used this badi for MM (incoming invoices):
    MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE
    Best regards.

  • With Holding Tax provided in IDOC FIDCC2 is not getting updated in Acc Doc

    Hi All,
    I am Posting a Accounting document in R/3 though Idoc FIDCCP02.
    This idoc has  With holding Tax info segment as E1FIXWT.  i gave all the info in this segment, like Tax code, Tax type , Withholding tax base amount (local currency) , Withholding tax base amount in document currency, Withholding tax amount (in local currencyand Withholding tax amount in document currency
    However, when the Idoc gets posted,and the accounting document gets generated the With holding tab does not get  populated in SAP.
    Please let me know your inputs, that why the woth holding tab is not getting populated with the relevant info from Idoc.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    I have the same issue. But as the idoc is generated in a SAP system of the same release I would have expected that the withholding tax data is already complete. Also are no withholding tax info populated in IT_ACCTX. There only VAT is visible. I suppose IT_ACCWT was meant.
    Anyone any idea?
    Regards
    Stefanie

  • India -With Holding Tax - Changes As per the Budget Approval

    Dear All
    Many of you are aware, there will not be any surcharge, education & higher education cess for with holding tax in Indai from 01.10.2009.
    Our client is operating seperate tax codes for Basic Duty, Surcharge and Education Cess. We have change the configuration and maintained 0% in the formula for calculating with holding tax for surcharge and education cessand we have maintained with the validity from 01.10.2009
    (ie., The above solution we thought because, we wish to maintain the same tax code and with out modifying the vendor master)
    Now, the system is working fine for all the scenarios, except the transfer of the old advances from special gl indicator to normal line item through T.Code (F-54). Under this T-code, the system is reversing only basic duty at old rates with out surcharge and cess.
    Kindly suggest the solution to reverse the surcharge and cess while doing F-54 with the posting dates as 01.10.2009 onwards
    Regards
    Anilkumar

    Please go through the SAP note 1359268 for budget changes
    also see the 1369775,1371380,1372734 for your exact requirement

  • Re: With holding tax is not picking up while excution of RERAPP

    Dear team,
    While executing the RERAPP.With holding tax is not picked.We are working on 4.7 version.We had suggested a badi to pull the with holding tax field.Still system is not showing any caluculation.Plz advice us if any one of you did the immplimenttation in 4.7 and how you resolved this problem .So that it would be help ful for us too.Please do the need ful.
    Regards,
    Suma.

    Dear Sir,
    What we did is all the with holding tax data include the basic amount calculations manually in excel there after  given the input to the system through accounting interface. You can try with your abaper. Plz make sure that GL code length and currency .This has been done through so much work around. Technical person will guide you .If you still facing the problem where exactly your facing then i can help you out.Please be more clear what you did till now then only i can explain you with clarity.
    Regards,
    Suma.

  • With holding tax

    Hi,
    If  i  select With holding  tab  when   entering Down payment request,Down payment and invoice for vendor,  i  am getting error message as  Withholding Tax information missing from line item
    Could you advise me where i made wrong cogfiguration for with holding tax.
    Your immediate response will be highly appreciated.
    With regards,
    V.K

    Hi
    Check Feild status group of G067 in OB14 and make sure that these are optional and also the Feild status group of WHT GL accounts you have assigned.
    There is always a possibility that these are in suppressed state.
    Award points if useful.
    sarma

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to open a non-default port for sftp?

    My MacMini at work used to listen on port 12345 for sFTP for close to 9 months but then something (probably a power cut...) messed all things Remote up with the office setup. So I tried to reset things. It didn't work. What do you think I'm doing wro

  • Calling labview VIs from python in Linux

    Hello. I've spent some time searching for this but I haven't found exactly what I was hoping for. I'm involved in a project that we're starting now and it involves creating a complex software architecture in order to control a robot. This software wi

  • HT4759 why is my iphone saying icloud is incompatible

    I am trying to transfer my data from an iphone 4 to an iphone 4s using icloud. When I get to 'choose backup' options show on the screen of when the phone was last updated (iOS 6.1) but I am unable to select them or press 'restore'. At the bottom of t

  • HTML-LITE format?

    Can we use this type of email? please help... dave....

  • Do I Have Spyware?

    I have an iPhone 5s. I am running iOS 7.1. Recently, I have found that my battery is draining unusually rapidly. I used to be able to go about 4 days between charges, and now can only go 1, maybe 2 days. Also, it heats up, even on stand-by. I have an