Query takes too long to run

I ran the following query:
select
 q1.ISO_COUNTRY_CODE q1country
 ,q3.ISO_COUNTRY_CODE q3country
 ,q1.LANGUAGE_CODE q1lang
 ,q3.LANGUAGE_CODE q3lang
 ,q1.POSTAL_CODE pcode1
 ,q3.POSTAL_CODE pcode3
 ,case when q1.POSTAL_CODE=q3.POSTAL_CODE then 1 else 0 end as "check"
 from street3 q3
 inner join street1 q1 on q1.PERM_ID=q3.PERM_ID
 where
nvl(upper(q1.ISO_COUNTRY_CODE),'tempnull')=nvl(upper(q3.ISO_COUNTRY_CODE),'tempnull')
 and nvl(upper(q1.LANGUAGE_CODE),'tempnull')=nvl(upper(q3.LANGUAGE_CODE),'tempnull')
 --and q1.POSTAL_CODE=q3.POSTAL_CODE
 and rownum<10
;Results were returned in less than a second:
Q1COUNTRY,Q3COUNTRY,Q1LANG,Q3LANG,PCODE1,PCODE3,check
USA,USA,ENG,ENG,49946,49946,1
USA,USA,ENG,ENG,49946,49946,1
USA,USA,ENG,ENG,49946,49946,1
USA,USA,ENG,ENG,49946,49946,1
USA,USA,ENG,ENG,49946,49946,1
... etc.
When I uncomment the line and q1.POSTAL_CODE=q3.POSTAL_CODE in the WHERE clause, however, the query takes forever to return. This doesn't make sense to me since the postcodes are equal in most cases anyway.

TKPROF is almost always gross overkill. Certainly overkill until one exhausts what can be done using an explain plan. You are correct that AUTOTRACE requires a special role, and also requires the DBA runl a script which far too many do not know how to do. So the answer is to provide, any time you are asking for tuning help, an explain plan report as no special privileges are required.
You will find demos here:
http://www.morganslibrary.org/library.html
under Explain Plan
Post the SQL, the report, and your full version number for help.

Similar Messages

My Query takes too long ...

Hi ,
Env , DB 10G , O/S Linux Redhat , My DB size is about 80G
My query takes too long , about 5 days to get results , can you please help to rewrite this query in a better way ,
declare
x number;
y date;
START_DATE DATE;
MDN VARCHAR2(12);
TOPUP VARCHAR2(50);
begin
for first_bundle in
select min(date_time_of_event) date_time_of_event ,account_identifier ,top_up_profile_name
from bundlepur
where account_profile='Basic'
AND account_identifier='665004664'
and in_service_result_indicator=0
and network_cause_result_indicator=0
and DATE_TIME_OF_EVENT >= to_date('16/07/2013','dd/mm/yyyy')
group by account_identifier,top_up_profile_name
order by date_time_of_event
loop
select sum(units_per_tariff_rum2) ,max(date_time_of_event)
into x,y
from OLD_LTE_CDR
where account_identifier=(select first_bundle.account_identifier from dual)
and date_time_of_event >= (select first_bundle.date_time_of_event from dual)
and -- no more than a month
date_time_of_event < ( select add_months(first_bundle.date_time_of_event,1) from dual)
and -- finished his bundle then buy a new one
date_time_of_event < ( SELECT MIN(DATE_TIME_OF_EVENT)
 FROM OLD_LTE_CDR
 WHERE DATE_TIME_OF_EVENT > (select (first_bundle.date_time_of_event)+1/24 from dual)
 AND IN_SERVICE_RESULT_INDICATOR=26);
select first_bundle.account_identifier ,first_bundle.top_up_profile_name
,FIRST_BUNDLE.date_time_of_event
INTO MDN,TOPUP,START_DATE
from dual;
insert into consumed1 VALUES(X,topup,MDN,START_DATE,Y);
end loop;
COMMIT;
end;

> where account_identifier=(select first_bundle.account_identifier from dual)
Why are you doing this? It's a completely unnecessary subquery.
Just do this:
where account_identifier = first_bundle.account_identifier
Same for all your other FROM DUAL subqueries. Get rid of them.
More importantly, don't use a cursor for loop. Just write one big INSERT statement that does what you want.

Update statement takes too long to run

Hello,
I am running this simple update statement, but it takes too long to run. It was running for 16 hours and then I cancelled it. It was not even finished. The destination table that I am updating has 2.6 million records, but I am only updating 206K records. If add ROWNUM <20 to the update statement works just fine and updates the right column with the right information. Do you have any ideas what could be wrong in my update statement? I am also using a DB link since CAP.ESS_LOOKUP table resides in different db from the destination table. We are running 11g Oracle Db.
UPDATE DEV_OCS.DOCMETA IPM
SET IPM.XIPM_APP_2_17 = (SELECT DISTINCT LKP.DOC_STATUS
FROM [email protected] LKP
WHERE LKP.DOC_NUM = IPM.XIPM_APP_2_1 AND
IPM.XIPMSYS_APP_ID = 2
WHERE
IPM.XIPMSYS_APP_ID = 2;
Thanks,
Ilya

matthew_morris wrote:
In the first SQL, the SELECT against the remote table was a correlated subquery. the 'WHERE LKP.DOC_NUM = IPM.XIPM_APP_2_1 AND IPM.XIPMSYS_APP_ID = 2" means that the subquery had to run once for each row of DEV_OCS.DOCMETA being evaluated. This might have meant thousands of iterations, meaning a great deal of network traffic (not to mention each performing a DISTINCT operation). Queries where the data is split between two or more databases are much more expensive than queries using only tables in a single database.Sorry to disappoint you again, but with clause by itself doesn't prevent from "subquery had to run once for each row of DEV_OCS.DOCMETA being evaluated". For example:
{code}
SQL> set linesize 132
SQL> explain plan for
2 update emp e
3 set deptno = (select t.deptno from dept@sol10 t where e.deptno = t.deptno)
4 /
Explained.
SQL> @?\rdbms\admin\utlxpls
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3247731149
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Inst |IN-OUT|
| 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | 14 | 42 | 17 (83)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 1 | UPDATE | EMP | | | | | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 14 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 3 | REMOTE | DEPT | 1 | 13 | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | SOL10 | R->S |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Remote SQL Information (identified by operation id):
3 - SELECT "DEPTNO" FROM "DEPT" "T" WHERE "DEPTNO"=:1 (accessing 'SOL10' )
16 rows selected.
SQL> explain plan for
2 update emp e
3 set deptno = (with t as (select * from dept@sol10) select t.deptno from t where e.deptno = t.deptno)
4 /
Explained.
SQL> @?\rdbms\admin\utlxpls
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3247731149
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Inst |IN-OUT|
| 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | 14 | 42 | 17 (83)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 1 | UPDATE | EMP | | | | | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 14 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 3 | REMOTE | DEPT | 1 | 13 | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | SOL10 | R->S |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Remote SQL Information (identified by operation id):
3 - SELECT "DEPTNO" FROM "DEPT" "DEPT" WHERE "DEPTNO"=:1 (accessing 'SOL10' )
16 rows selected.
SQL>
{code}
As you can see, WITH clause by itself guaranties nothing. We must force optimizer to materialize it:
{code}
SQL> explain plan for
2 update emp e
3 set deptno = (with t as (select /*+ materialize */ * from dept@sol10) select t.deptno from t where e.deptno = t.deptno
4 /
Explained.
SQL> @?\rdbms\admin\utlxpls
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3568118945
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Inst |IN-OUT|
| 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | 14 | 42 | 87 (17)| 00:00:02 | | |
| 1 | UPDATE | EMP | | | | | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | EMP | 14 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 3 | TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION | | | | | | | |
| 4 | LOAD AS SELECT | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_1CEEEBC | | | | | | |
| 5 | REMOTE | DEPT | 4 | 80 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | SOL10 | R->S |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|* 6 | VIEW | | 4 | 52 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_1CEEEBC | 4 | 80 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
6 - filter("T"."DEPTNO"=:B1)
Remote SQL Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
5 - SELECT "DEPTNO","DNAME","LOC" FROM "DEPT" "DEPT" (accessing 'SOL10' )
25 rows selected.
SQL>
{code}
I do know hint materialize is not documented, but I don't know any other way besides splitting statement in two to materialize it.
SY.

Sql Query takes too long to enter into the first line

Hi Friends,
I am using SQLServer 2008. I am running the query for fetching the data from database. when i am running first time after executed the "DBCC FREEPROCCACHE" query for clear cache memory, it takes too long (7 to 9 second) to enter into first
line of the stored procedure. After its enter into the first statement of the SP, its fetching the data within a second. I think there is no problem with Sqlquery. Kindly let me know if you know the reason behind this.
Sample Example:
Create Sp Sp_Name
as
Begin
print Getdate()
Sql statements for fetching datas
Print Getdate()
End
In the above example, there is no difference between first date and second date.
Please help me to trouble shooting this problem.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajkumar.R

i am running first time after executed the "DBCC FREEPROCCACHE" query for clear cache memory, it takes too long (7 to 9 second)
Additional to Manoj: A
DBCC FREEPROCCACHE clears the procedure cache, so all store procedure must be newly compilied on the first call.
Olaf Helper
[ Blog] [ Xing] [ MVP]

Sql query taking too long to run

I am not sure what to do. My app takes two long to run and the reason is right in front of me, but again, I don't know what to do or where to go. (VB.Net VS 2005)
The main part of my query takes about 15 to 20 seconds to run. When I tack on this other part it slows the response to over 2 minutes.
Even running this other part alone takes 2+ minutes. The query as two sum functions. Is it possible, some how, that this query can run building it's results into another table and then I use this new table with the results all ready to go and join into the first part of the main query?
I am using oracle 9i with a Sql Developer. Which I am new to. Below is the culprit: Thanks
Select adorder.primaryorderer_client_id,
(sum(Case When insertion.insert_date_id >= 2648 and insertion.insert_date_id < 2683
Then insertchargedetail.Amount_insertDetail Else 0 End)) As CurRev,
(sum(Case When insertion.insert_date_id >= 2282 and insertion.insert_date_id < 2317
Then insertchargedetail.Amount_insertDetail Else 0 End)) As LastRev
from Adorder
Inner Join insertion On Adorder.id=insertion.Adorder_id
Inner Join insertchargesummary On insertion.id=insertchargesummary.insertion_id
Inner Join insertchargedetail On insertchargesummary.id=insertchargedetail.insertchargesummary_id
where ((insertion.insert_date_id >= 2282 and insertion.insert_date_id < 2317)
Or (insertion.insert_date_id >= 2648 and insertion.insert_date_id < 2683))
group by adorder.primaryorderer_client_id;

How to post a tuning request:
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting

Time_out Dump on this query take too long time

hi experts,
in my report a query taking too long time
pl. provide performance tips or suggestions
select mkpf~mblnr mkpf~mjahr mkpf~usnam mkpf~vgart
       mkpf~xabln mkpf~xblnr mkpf~zshift mkpf~frbnr
       mkpf~bktxt mkpf~bldat mkpf~budat mkpf~cpudt
       mkpf~cputm mseg~anln1 mseg~anln2 mseg~aplzl
       mseg~aufnr mseg~aufpl mseg~bpmng mseg~bprme
       mseg~bstme mseg~bstmg mseg~bukrs mseg~bwart
       mseg~bwtar mseg~charg mseg~dmbtr mseg~ebeln
       mseg~ebelp mseg~erfme mseg~erfmg mseg~exbwr
       mseg~exvkw mseg~grund mseg~kdauf mseg~kdein
       mseg~kdpos mseg~kostl mseg~kunnr mseg~kzbew
       mseg~kzvbr mseg~kzzug mseg~lgort mseg~lifnr
       mseg~matnr mseg~meins mseg~menge mseg~lsmng
       mseg~nplnr mseg~ps_psp_pnr mseg~rsnum mseg~rspos
       mseg~shkzg mseg~sobkz mseg~vkwrt mseg~waers
       mseg~werks mseg~xauto mseg~zeile mseg~SGTXT
    into table itab
       from mkpf as mkpf
        inner join mseg as mseg
                on mkpf~MBLNR = mseg~mblnr
               and mkpf~mjahr = mseg~mjahr

no the original query is, i use where clouse with conditions.
select mkpf~mblnr mkpf~mjahr mkpf~usnam mkpf~vgart
       mkpf~xabln mkpf~xblnr mkpf~zshift mkpf~frbnr
       mkpf~bktxt mkpf~bldat mkpf~budat mkpf~cpudt
       mkpf~cputm mseg~anln1 mseg~anln2 mseg~aplzl
       mseg~aufnr mseg~aufpl mseg~bpmng mseg~bprme
       mseg~bstme mseg~bstmg mseg~bukrs mseg~bwart
       mseg~bwtar mseg~charg mseg~dmbtr mseg~ebeln
       mseg~ebelp mseg~erfme mseg~erfmg mseg~exbwr
       mseg~exvkw mseg~grund mseg~kdauf mseg~kdein
       mseg~kdpos mseg~kostl mseg~kunnr mseg~kzbew
       mseg~kzvbr mseg~kzzug mseg~lgort mseg~lifnr
       mseg~matnr mseg~meins mseg~menge mseg~lsmng
       mseg~nplnr mseg~ps_psp_pnr mseg~rsnum mseg~rspos
       mseg~shkzg mseg~sobkz mseg~vkwrt mseg~waers
       mseg~werks mseg~xauto mseg~zeile mseg~SGTXT
    into table itab
       from mkpf as mkpf
        inner join mseg as mseg
                on mkpf~MBLNR = mseg~mblnr
               and mkpf~mjahr = mseg~mjahr
    WHERE mkpf~budat IN budat
      AND mkpf~usnam IN usnam
      AND mkpf~vgart IN vgart
      AND mkpf~xblnr IN xblnr
      AND mkpf~zshift IN p_shift
      AND mseg~bwart IN bwart
      AND mseg~matnr IN matnr
      AND mseg~werks IN werks
      AND mseg~lgort IN lgort
      AND mseg~charg IN charg
      AND mseg~sobkz IN sobkz
      AND mseg~lifnr IN lifnr
      AND mseg~kunnr IN kunnr.

Deletion Query takes too long

I have two tables with exactly the same structure. The table 1 gets data and one procedure reads that data and inserts them into another table (table2) for processing them. I have a delete query which is taking too long to execute.
The query is as follows
delete
from events.temp_act a
where a.chess_ts < (select max(chess_ts) from events.temp_act b
where a.db_type = b.db_type
and a.order_no = b.order_no
and a.acv_no = b.acv_no
There is a composite index in this table which is (db_type,order_no,acv_no)
In my procedure, I drop and create the index for faster processing and also analyze the index.
The above deletion query approximately deletes half the number of total records.
There is no primary key in the table for the reason that there can be no unique record identifier.
The query takes nearly 2 hours for deleting about 1100000 records.
Is there a way to make this query run faster?

What is the explain plan for this statement? Is the index even being used?
Is the table analyzed as well as the index?
Dropping/re-creating the index - not likely to help. I would leave this out.
Have you tried other variations, like:
delete
from events.temp_act
where (db_type, order_no, acv_vo, chess_ts)
 not in (select db_type, order_no, acv_vo, max(chess_ts)
 from events.temp_act b
 group by db_type, order_no, acv_vo);

Query takes too long to complete...

SELECT SUBSTR(C.PHRMNUM,1,2), C.PHRMNUM, PH.NABPNUM, HICNUMBER, RCVDATE, RXDATE, C.NDC
, MMITHPTY, QUANTITY, STATUS1, ALLOWED, PRICE,
COPMT, INSPMT, PATPMT, BALANCE, CASHADJ, NONCASHADJ, CODE, PAIDTOVEN
, MMFEE, PAIDDATE, IDNUMBER, M.GPI,
GPINAME, DIVISION, CHAINCODE, CVASTATUS, TRISTATUS, PSTATUS,
CASE WHEN C.PATIENTELIGIBILITY = 'S' OR C.PATIENTELIGIBILITY = 'W' THEN 'Y' ELSE 'N' END
FROM HIST_CLAIM C, HIST_PATIENT P, MEDISPAN_NDC M, HIST_PHARMACY PH
WHERE (1 = 1)
AND (C.PATNUM = P.PATNUM)
AND (C.MEMBER = P.MEMBER)
AND (C.NDC = M.NDC(+))
AND (C.PHRMNUM = PH.PHRMNUM)
AND (C.INSBRANCH = 'VA')
AND (STATUS1 <> 'D')
AND (RCVDATE >= '01-JAN-2002')
AND (RCVDATE <= '19-AUG-2005')

Also, here is the explain plan. As you can see, the outer query returns 19G of information! Holy schmoly!!
Operation Object Name Rows Bytes Cost TQ In/Out PStart PStop
SELECT STATEMENT 61 M 53579
NESTED LOOPS OUTER 61 M 19G 53579
NESTED LOOPS 26 K 7 M 131
NESTED LOOPS 43 11 K 88
TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID HIST_CLAIM 43 9 K 2 ROWID ROW L
INDEX RANGE SCAN HIST_CLAIM_INSBRANCH_NDX 43 1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HIST_PATIENT 1 M 45 M 2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HIST_PATIENT_PATNUM_MEMBER_PK 1 M 1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HIST_PHARMACY 62 K 1 M 1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HIST_PHARMACY_PK 62 K
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID MEDISPAN_NDC 229 K 10 M 2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN MEDISPAN_NDC_PK 229 K 1

Report Takes Too Long Time

Hi!
I am in troubble
following is the query
SELECT inv_no, inv_name, inv_desc, i.cat_id, cat_name, i.sub_cat_id,
sub_cat_name, asset_cost, del_date, i.bl_id, gen_desc bl_desc, p.prvcode, prvdesc, cur_loc,
pldesc, i.pmempno, pmname, i.empid, empname
FROM inv_reg i,
cat_reg c,
sub_cat_reg s,
gen_desc_reg g,
ploc p,
province r,
pmaster m,
iemp_reg e
WHERE i.sub_cat_id = s.sub_cat_id
AND i.cat_id = s.cat_id
AND s.cat_id = c.cat_id
AND i.bl_id = g.gen_id
AND i.cur_loc = p.plcode
AND p.prvcode = r.prvcode
AND i.pmempno = m.pmempno(+)
AND i.empid = e.empid(+)
&wc
order by prvdesc, pldesc, cat_name, sub_cat_name, inv_no
and this query returns 32000 records
when i run this query on reports 10g
then it takes 10 to 20 minuts to generate report
how can i optimize it...?

Hi Waqas Attari
Pls study & try this ....
When your query takes too long ...
hope it helps....
Regards,
Abdetu...

Loop with WMI Query taking too long, need to break out if time exceeds 5 min

I've written a script that will loop through a list of computers and run a WMI query using the Win32_Product class. I am pinging the host first to ensure its online which eliminates wasting time but the issue I'm facing is that some of the machines
are online but the WMI Query takes too long and holds up the script. I wanted to add a timeout to the WMI query so if a particular host will not respond to the query or gets stuck the loop will break out an go to the next computer object. I've added my code
below:
$Computers = @()
$computers += "BES10-BH"
$computers += "AUTSUP-VSUS"
$computers += "AppClus06-BH"
$computers += "Aut01-BH"
$computers += "AutLH-VSUS"
$computers += "AW-MGMT01-VSUS"
$computers += "BAMBOOAGT-VSUS"
## Loop through all computer objects found in $Computes Array
$JavaInfo = @()
FOREACH($Client in $Computers)
## Gather WMI installed Software info from each client queried
Clear-Host
Write-Host "Querying: $Client" -foregroundcolor "yellow"
$HostCount++
$Online = (test-connection -ComputerName ADRAP-VSUS -Count 1 -Quiet)
IF($Online -eq "True")
$ColItem = Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_Product -ComputerName $Client -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | `
Where {(($_.name -match "Java") -and (!($_.name -match "Auto|Visual")))} | `
Select-Object Name,Version
FOREACH($Item in $ColItem)
## Write Host Name as variable
$HostNm = ($Client).ToUpper()
## Query Named Version of Java, if Java is not installed fill variable as "No Java Installed
$JavaVerName = $Item.name
IF([string]::IsNullOrEmpty($JavaVerName))
{$JavaVerName = "No Installed"}
## Query Version of Java, if Java is not installed fill variable as "No Java Installed
$JavaVer = $Item.Version
IF([string]::IsNullOrEmpty($JavaVer))
{$JavaVer = "Not Installed"}
## Create new object to organize Host,JavaName & Version
$JavaProp = New-Object -TypeName PSObject -Property @{
"HostName" = $HostNm
"JavaVerName" = $JavaVerName
"JavaVer" = $JavaVer
## Add new object data "JavaProp" from loop into array "JavaInfo"
$JavaInfo += $JavaProp
Else
{Write-Host "$Client didn't respond, Skipping..." -foregroundcolor "Red"}

Let me give you a bigger picture of the script. I've included the emailed table the script produces and the actual script. While running the script certain hosts get hung up when running the WMI query which causes the script to never complete. From one of
the posts I was able to use the Get-WmiCustom function to add a timeout 0f 15 seconds and then the script will continue if it is stuck. The problem is when a host is skipped I am not aware of it because my script is not reporting the server that timed out.
If you look at ZLBH02-VSUS highlighted in the report you can see that its reporting not installed when it should say something to the effect query hung.
How can I add a variable in the function that will be available outside the function that I can key off of to differentiate between a host that does not have the software installed and one that failed to query?
Script Output:
Script:
## Name: JavaReportWMI.ps1 ##
## Requires: Power Shell 2.0 ##
## Created: January 06, 2015 ##
<##> $Version = "Script Version: 1.0" <##>
<##> $LastUpdate = "Updated: January 06, 2015" <##>
## Configure Compliant Java Versions Below ##
<##> $java6 = "6.0.430" <##>
<##> $javaSEDEVKit6 = "1.6.0.430" <##>
<##> $java7 = "7.0.710" <##>
<##> $javaSEDEVKit7 = "1.7.0.710" <##>
<##> $java8 = "8.0.250" <##>
<##> $javaSEDDEVKit8 = "1.8.0.250" <##>
## Import Active Directory Module
Import-Module ActiveDirectory
$Timeout = "False"
Function Get-WmiCustom([string]$computername,[string]$namespace,[string]$class,[int]$timeout=15)
$ConnectionOptions = new-object System.Management.ConnectionOptions
$EnumerationOptions = new-object System.Management.EnumerationOptions
$timeoutseconds = new-timespan -seconds $timeout
$EnumerationOptions.set_timeout($timeoutseconds)
$assembledpath = "\\" + $computername + "\" + $namespace
#write-host $assembledpath -foregroundcolor yellow
$Scope = new-object System.Management.ManagementScope $assembledpath, $ConnectionOptions
$Scope.Connect()
$querystring = "SELECT * FROM " + $class
#write-host $querystring
$query = new-object System.Management.ObjectQuery $querystring
$searcher = new-object System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher
$searcher.set_options($EnumerationOptions)
$searcher.Query = $querystring
$searcher.Scope = $Scope
trap { $_ } $result = $searcher.get()
return $result
## Log time for duration clock
$Start = Get-Date
$StartTime = "StartTime: " + $Start.ToShortTimeString()
## Environmental Variables
$QueryMode = $Args #parameter for either "Desktops" / "Servers"
$CsvPath = "C:\Scripts\JavaReport\JavaReport" + "$QueryMode" + ".csv"
$Date = Get-Date
$Domain = $env:UserDomain
$HostName = ($env:ComputerName).ToLower()
## Regional Settings
## Used for testing
IF ($Domain -eq "abc") {$Region = "US"; $SMTPDomain = "abc.com"; `
$ToAddress = "[email protected]"; `
$ReplyDomain = "abc.com"; $smtpServer = "relay.abc.com"}
## Control Variables
$FromAddress = "JavaReport@$Hostname.na.$SMTPDomain"
$EmailSubject = "Java Report - $Region"
$computers = @()
$computers += "ZLBH02-VSUS"
$computers += "AUTSUP-VSUS"
$computers += "AppClus06-BH"
$computers += "Aut01-BH"
$computers += "AutLH-VSUS"
$computers += "AW-MGMT01-VSUS"
$computers += "BAMBOOAGT-VSUS"
#>
## Loop through all computer objects found in $Computes Array
$JavaInfo = @()
FOREACH($Client in $Computers)
## Gather WMI installed Software info from each client queried
Clear-Host
Write-Host "Querying: $Client" -foregroundcolor "yellow"
$HostCount++
$Online = (test-connection -ComputerName ADRAP-VSUS -Count 1 -Quiet)
IF($Online -eq "True")
$ColItem = Get-WmiCustom -Class Win32_Product -Namespace "root\cimv2" -ComputerName $Client -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | `
Where {(($_.name -match "Java") -and (!($_.name -match "Auto|Visual")))} | `
Select-Object Name,Version
FOREACH($Item in $ColItem)
## Write Host Name as variable
$HostNm = ($Client).ToUpper()
## Query Named Version of Java, if Java is not installed fill variable as "No Java Installed
$JavaVerName = $Item.name
IF([string]::IsNullOrEmpty($JavaVerName))
{$JavaVerName = "No Installed"}
## Query Version of Java, if Java is not installed fill variable as "No Java Installed
$JavaVer = $Item.Version
IF([string]::IsNullOrEmpty($JavaVer))
{$JavaVer = "Not Installed"}
## Create new object to organize Host,JavaName & Version
$JavaProp = New-Object -TypeName PSObject -Property @{
"HostName" = $HostNm
"JavaVerName" = $JavaVerName
"JavaVer" = $JavaVer
## Add new object data "JavaProp" from loop into array "JavaInfo"
$JavaInfo += $JavaProp
Else
{Write-Host "$Client didn't respond, Skipping..." -foregroundcolor "Red"}
#Write-Host "Host Query Count: $LoopCount" -foregroundcolor "yellow"
## Sort Array
Write-Host "Starting Array" -foregroundcolor "yellow"
$JavaInfoSorted = $JavaInfo | Sort-object HostName
Write-Host "Starting Export CSV" -foregroundcolor "yellow"
## Export CSV file
$JavaInfoSorted | export-csv -NoType $CsvPath -Force
$Att = new-object Net.Mail.Attachment($CsvPath)
Write-Host "Building Table Header" -foregroundcolor "yellow"
## Table Header
$list = "<table border=1>"
$list += "<tr><th>Host Name</th><th>Java Ver Name</th><th>Ver Number</th></tr>"
Write-Host "Building HTML Table" -foregroundcolor "yellow"
FOREACH($Item in $JavaInfoSorted)
Write-Host "$UniqueHost" -foregroundcolor "Yellow"
## Alternate Table Shading between Green and White
IF($LoopCount++ % 2 -eq 0)
{$BK = "bgcolor='E5F5D7'"}
ELSE
{$BK = "bgcolor='FFFFFF'"}
## Set Variables
$JVer = $Item.JavaVer
$Jname = $Item.JavaVerName
## Change Non-Compliant Java Versions to red in table
IF((($jVer -like "6.0*") -and (!($jVer -match $java6))) -or `
(($jName -like "*Java(TM) SE Development Kit 6*") -and (!($jName -match $javaSEDEVKit6))) -or `
(($jVer -like "7.0*") -and (!($jVer -match $java7))) -or `
(($jName -like "*Java SE Development Kit 7*") -and (!($jName -match $javaSEDEVKit7))))
$list += "<tr $BK style='color: #ff0000'>"
## Compliant Java version are displayed in black
ELSE
$list += "<tr $BK style='color: #000000'>"
## Populate table with host name variable
$list += "<td>" + $Item."HostName" + "</td>"
## Populate table with Java Version Name variable
$list += "<td>" + $Item."JavaVerName" + "</td>"
## Populate table with Java Versionvariable
$list += "<td>" + $Item."JavaVer" + "</td>"
$list += "</tr>"
$list += "</table>"
$End = Get-Date
$EndTime = "EndTime: " + $End.ToShortTimeString()
#$TimeDiff = New-TimeSpan -Start $StartTime -End $EndTime
$StartTime
$EndTime
$TimeDiff
Write-Host "Total Hosts:$HostCount"
## Email Function
Function SendEmail
$msg = new-object Net.Mail.MailMessage
$smtp = new-object Net.Mail.SmtpClient($smtpServer)
$msg.From = ($FromAddress)
$msg.ReplyTo =($ToAddress)
$msg.To.Add($ToAddress)
#$msg.BCC.Add($BCCAddress)
$msg.Attachments.Add($Att)
$msg.Subject = ($EmailSubject)
$msg.Body = $Body
$msg.IsBodyHTML = $true
$smtp.Send($msg)
$msg.Dispose()
## Email Body
$Body = $Body + @"
<html><body>
Java Report - $Region
$list
</html></body>
<html><body>
 Note: Items in red do not have the latest version of Java installed. Please open a ticket to have an engineer address the issue.
</html></body>
<html><body>

$StartTime 
$EndTime 
$TimeDiff 
$HostCount 


Run date: $Date 
$Version 
$LastUpdate 

</html></body>
## Send Email
SendEmail

Query taking too long, yet cost is low

hi guys,
I am running a query on two databases that were created the same way and have the same data.
On one the cost is nearly a million, and it runs in a matter of a few seconds
On the other, the cost is 40000, and it doesn't finish executing
I have looked at the explain plan, and there is no cartesian merge join on the second query, yet it is taking so long. What can I do to investigate this?
thanks

Could you please post an properly formatted explain plan output using DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY including the "Predicate Information" section below the plan to provide more details regarding your statement. Please use the \[code\] and \[code\] tags to enhance readability of the output provided:
In SQL*Plus:
SET LINESIZE 130
EXPLAIN PLAN FOR <your statement>;
SELECT * FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY);Note that the package DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY is only available from 9i on.
In previous versions you could run the following in SQL*Plus (on the server) instead:
@?/rdbms/admin/utlxplsA different approach in SQL*Plus:
SET AUTOTRACE ON EXPLAIN
<run your statement>;will also show the execution plan.
In order to get a better understanding where your statement spends the time you might want to turn on SQL trace as described here:
[When your query takes too long|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=501834]
and post the "tkprof" output here, too.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Query takes a long time

Hi,
I have a simple query that takes a long time and sometimes hangs. I want to know if there are any orders that were shipped but are not in the ra_interface_lines_all table for one reason or another. The query is
select source_header_number from wsh_delivery_details
where inv_interfaced_flag = 'Y'
and released_status = 'C'
and oe_interfaced_flag = 'Y'
and creation_date > 'DD-MON=YYYY'
and source_header_number not in (select interface_line_attribute1 from
ra_interface_lines_all
where ship_date_actual >'DD-MON-YYYY')
Thanks
A/A

Follow the thread posted to generate an execution plan. Ideally you run your statement with SQL tracing enabled and run the tkprof utility on the trace file generated as outlined in the thread.
Without further information it's just guess-work. And by the way, as already mentioned, use the TO_DATE function for DATE type literals or use the ANSI DATE literal format: DATE 'YYYY-MM-DD', otherwise you are depending on the NLS settings of the client executing the query. So:
Could you please post an properly formatted explain plan output using DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY including the "Predicate Information" section below the plan to provide more details regarding your statement. Please use the \[code\] and \[code\] tags to enhance readability of the output provided:
In SQL*Plus:
SET LINESIZE 130
EXPLAIN PLAN FOR <your statement>;
SELECT * FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY);Note that the package DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY is only available from 9i on.
In previous versions you could run the following in SQL*Plus (on the server) instead:
@?/rdbms/admin/utlxplsA different approach in SQL*Plus:
SET AUTOTRACE ON EXPLAIN
<run your statement>;will also show the execution plan.
In order to get a better understanding where your statement spends the time you might want to turn on SQL trace as described here:
[When your query takes too long|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=501834]
and post the "tkprof" output here, too.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/
Edited by: Randolf Geist on Sep 23, 2008 4:08 PM
Added DATE type caveat

Query taking too long a time

Hi friends,
the view I have created on a table is taking toooo long a time to gimme the results
when am trying to select * from table_name
Can some one suggest me a solution pls
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW XXKDD_LATEST_SAL
(RN, MONTH, YEAR, EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, POSITION,
PAYROLL_NAME, DEPT, STATUS, TERMINATION_DATE, FULL_NAME,
TOP3, BASIC_SALARY)
AS
select "RN","MONTH","YEAR","EMPLOYEE_NUMBER","POSITION","PAYROLL_NAME","DEPT","STATUS","TERMINATION_DATE","FULL_NAME","TOP3","BASIC_SALARY" from (
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY employee_number ORDER BY employee_number) rn, tp.*
FROM (SELECT MONTH, YEAR, employee_number, position, payroll_name, dept, status, termination_date, full_name,
ROW_NUMBER () OVER (PARTITION BY employee_number, basic_salary ORDER BY YEAR , MONTH) top3,
DECODE (basic_salary,
100000, 4500,
24000, 1921,
basic_salary
) basic_salary
FROM kdd_pay_hr_sal_vw
order by employee_number,year desc) tp
WHERE top3 <= 1
select * from XXKDD_LATEST_SAL

Read these informative threads:
When your query takes too long ...
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
And edit your post, add relevant details like database version, execution plan etc., it is all listed in the above links.
And use the {noformat}{noformat}-tags, to keep your examples formatted and indented and readable.

Quantity conversion takes too long

Dear Gurus,
I'm having a problem with the query execution time when I convert the quantities of the materials in KGs.
I have done all the steps to set up material conversion with reference infoobject 0material and using a dynamic determination of conversion factor using central units of measurement (T006) otherwise reference infoobject.
With these settings the query takes too long to execute because of the large number of material codes. If I remove this conversion the query is executed very fast.
Any ideas? Do I have to create an index in UOM0MATE ODS? What am I missing here?
Regards,
Panos

Hi Panos,
I had the same issue, but it's solved for me now. I tried the same way you did, by creating a secondary index on the active table of the DSO. The only difference is, that I included all the SID fields to the index.
Did you mark your index as unique? Also make sure, that the index really is created on the DB.
If the performance still is not getting better, check in RSRT the statistics if the unit conversion really is the problem.
Kindly regards,
Matthias

Sometimes my computer takes too long to connect to new website. I am running a pretty powerful work program at same time, what is the best solution? Upgrading speed from cable network, is it a hard drive issue? do I need to "clean out" the computer?

Many times my computer takes too long to connect to new website. I have wireless internet (time capsule) and I am running a pretty powerful real time financial work program at same time, what is the best solution? Upgrading speed from cable network? is it a hard drive issue? do I only need to "clean out" the computer? Or all of the above...not to computer saavy. It is a Macbook Pro osx 10.6.8 (late 2010).

Almost certainly none of the above! Try each of the following in this order:
Select 'Reset Safari' from the Safari menu.
Close down Safari; move <home>/Library/Caches/com.apple.Safari/Cache.db to the trash; restart Safari.
Change the DNS servers in your network settings to use the OpenDNS servers: 208.67.222.222 and 208.67.220.220
Turn off DNS pre-fetching by entering the following command in Terminal and restarting Safari:
defaults write com.apple.safari WebKitDNSPrefetchingEnabled -boolean false

Query takes too long to run

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for