Query taking long time in oracle 10g

I have a query which runs in 1 minute in oracle 8 but it takes 2 hours in oracle 10. The query has couple of sub queries to select the max effective date as wee as current effective sequence. I checked the parameters and their values are as follows. I want to know whether any values can be increased to make it run faster. Also I did not find the parameter unnestsubquery, I think it should be set to FALSE but did not find the value when I did select * from v$parameter. Is it set to false value by default or should i explicitly declare it. Thanks
Statistic Name Result
processes 200
sessions 225
timed_statistics TRUE
sga_target 335544320
control_files /ora1db13/oradata/KVSU2P13/control01.ctl, /ora2db13/o
db_block_size 8192
compatible 10.2.0.1.0
db_file_multiblock_read_count 4
undo_management AUTO
undo_tablespace ADP_UNDO
db_domain
service_names KVSU2P13, KVSU2P13_VSUP
dispatchers (PROTOCOL=tcp)(DISPATCHERS=4)(CONNECTIONS=50)
shared_servers 10
max_shared_servers 20
shared_server_sessions 150
job_queue_processes 10
background_dump_dest /udb01/app/oracle/admin/KVSU2P13/bdump
user_dump_dest /udb01/app/oracle/admin/KVSU2P13/udump
core_dump_dest /udb01/app/oracle/admin/KVSU2P13/cdump
db_name KVSU2P13
open_cursors 300
optimizercost_based_transformation off
alwayssemi_join off
optimizer_index_cost_adj 10
optimizer_index_caching 50
pga_aggregate_target 25165824
workarea_size_policy auto

Please read these standard threads:
How to post a tuning request:
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
When your query takes too long:
When your query takes too long ...

Similar Messages

  • Query taking long time for EXTRACTING the data more than 24 hours

    Hi ,
    Query taking long time for EXTRACTING the data more than 24 hours please find the query and explain plan details below even indexes avilable on table's goe's to FULL TABLE SCAN. please suggest me.......
    SQL> explain plan for select a.account_id,round(a.account_balance,2) account_balance,
    2 nvl(ah.invoice_id,ah.adjustment_id) transaction_id,
    to_char(ah.effective_start_date,'DD-MON-YYYY') transaction_date,
    to_char(nvl(i.payment_due_date,
    to_date('30-12-9999','dd-mm-yyyy')),'DD-MON-YYYY')
    due_date, ah.current_balance-ah.previous_balance amount,
    decode(ah.invoice_id,null,'A','I') transaction_type
    3 4 5 6 7 8 from account a,account_history ah,invoice i_+
    where a.account_id=ah.account_id
    and a.account_type_id=1000002
    and round(a.account_balance,2) > 0
    and (ah.invoice_id is not null or ah.adjustment_id is not null)
    and ah.CURRENT_BALANCE > ah.previous_balance
    and ah.invoice_id=i.invoice_id(+)
    AND a.account_balance > 0
    order by a.account_id,ah.effective_start_date desc; 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    Explained.
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)|
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 544K| 30M| | 693K (20)|
    | 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 544K| 30M| 75M| 693K (20)|
    |* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 544K| 30M| | 689K (20)|
    |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ACCOUNT | 20080 | 294K| | 6220 (18)|
    |* 4 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 131M| 5532M| 5155M| 678K (20)|
    |* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| ACCOUNT_HISTORY | 131M| 3646M| | 197K (25)|
    | 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| INVOICE | 262M| 3758M| | 306K (18)|
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    2 - access("A"."ACCOUNT_ID"="AH"."ACCOUNT_ID")
    3 - filter("A"."ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID"=1000002 AND "A"."ACCOUNT_BALANCE">0 AND
    ROUND("A"."ACCOUNT_BALANCE",2)>0)
    4 - access("AH"."INVOICE_ID"="I"."INVOICE_ID"(+))
    5 - filter("AH"."CURRENT_BALANCE">"AH"."PREVIOUS_BALANCE" AND ("AH"."INVOICE_ID"
    IS NOT NULL OR "AH"."ADJUSTMENT_ID" IS NOT NULL))
    22 rows selected.
    Index Details:+_
    SQL> select INDEX_OWNER,INDEX_NAME,COLUMN_NAME,TABLE_NAME from dba_ind_columns where
    2 table_name in ('INVOICE','ACCOUNT','ACCOUNT_HISTORY') order by 4;
    INDEX_OWNER INDEX_NAME COLUMN_NAME TABLE_NAME
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 P_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT CUSTOMER_NODE_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_ACCOUNT_TYPE ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_INVOICE INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_PREVIOUS_INVOICE PREVIOUS_INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME_ID ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME_ID ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_LAST_MODIFIED_ACCOUNT LAST_MODIFIED ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_INVOICE_ACCOUNT INVOICE_ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ACCOUNT SEQNR ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_INVOICE INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADINV INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA CURRENT_BALANCE ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_LMOD LAST_MODIFIED ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADINV ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_PAYMENT PAYMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_APPLIED_DT APPLIED_DATE ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 P_INVOICE INVOICE_ID INVOICE
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE CUSTOMER_INVOICE_STR INVOICE
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_LAST_MODIFIED_INVOICE LAST_MODIFIED INVOICE
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID INVOICE
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE_ACCOUNT BILL_RUN_ID INVOICE
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_BILL_RUN BILL_RUN_ID INVOICE
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_INVOICE_TYPE INVOICE_TYPE_ID INVOICE
    OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_CUSTOMER_NODE CUSTOMER_NODE_ID INVOICE
    32 rows selected.
    Regards,
    Bathula
    Oracle-DBA

    I have some suggestions. But first, you realize that you have some redundant indexes, right? You have an index on account(account_name) and also account(account_name, account_id), and also account_history(invoice_id) and account_history(invoice_id, adjustment_id). No matter, I will suggest some new composite indexes.
    Also, you do not need two lines for these conditions:
    and round(a.account_balance, 2) > 0
    AND a.account_balance > 0
    You can just use: and a.account_balance >= 0.005
    So the formatted query isselect a.account_id,
           round(a.account_balance, 2) account_balance,
           nvl(ah.invoice_id, ah.adjustment_id) transaction_id,
           to_char(ah.effective_start_date, 'DD-MON-YYYY') transaction_date,
           to_char(nvl(i.payment_due_date, to_date('30-12-9999', 'dd-mm-yyyy')),
                   'DD-MON-YYYY') due_date,
           ah.current_balance - ah.previous_balance amount,
           decode(ah.invoice_id, null, 'A', 'I') transaction_type
      from account a, account_history ah, invoice i
    where a.account_id = ah.account_id
       and a.account_type_id = 1000002
       and (ah.invoice_id is not null or ah.adjustment_id is not null)
       and ah.CURRENT_BALANCE > ah.previous_balance
       and ah.invoice_id = i.invoice_id(+)
       AND a.account_balance >= .005
    order by a.account_id, ah.effective_start_date desc;You will probably want to select:
    1. From ACCOUNT first (your smaller table), for which you supply a literal on account_type_id. That should limit the accounts retrieved from ACCOUNT_HISTORY
    2. From ACCOUNT_HISTORY. We want to limit the records as much as possible on this table because of the outer join.
    3. INVOICE we want to access last because it seems to be least restricted, it is the biggest, and it has the outer join condition so it will manufacture rows to match as many rows as come back from account_history.
    Try the query above after creating the following composite indexes. The order of the columns is important:create index account_composite_i on account(account_type_id, account_balance, account_id);
    create index acct_history_comp_i on account_history(account_id, invoice_id, adjustment_id, current_balance, previous_balance, effective_start_date);
    create index invoice_composite_i on invoice(invoice_id, payment_due_date);All the columns used in the where clause will be indexed, in a logical order suited to the needs of the query. Plus each selected column is indexed as well so that we should not need to touch the tables at all to satisfy the query.
    Try the query after creating these indexes.
    A final suggestion is to try larger sort and hash area sizes and a manual workarea policy.alter session set workarea_size_policy = manual;
    alter session set sort_area_size = 2147483647;
    alter session set hash_area_size = 2147483647;

  • Query taking long time to run.

    The following query is taking long time to run, is there anything can be done to make it run faster by changing the sql etc.
    select distinct
    A.DEPTID,
    A.POSITION_NBR,
    A.EMPLID,
    A.EMPL_RCD_NBR,
    A.EFFDT,
    B.NAME,
    A.EMPL_STATUS,
    A.JOBCODE,
    A.ANNUAL_RT,
    A.STD_HOURS,
    A.PRIMARY_JOB,
    C.POSN_STATUS,
    case when A.POSITION_NBR = ' ' then 0 else C.STD_HOURS end,
    case when A.POSITION_NBR = ' ' then ' ' else C.DEPTID end
    from PS_JOB A,
    PS_PERSONAL_DATA B,
    PS_POSITION_DATA C
    where A.EMPLID = B.EMPLID
    and
    ((A.POSITION_NBR = C.POSITION_NBR
    and A.EFFSEQ = (select max(D.EFFSEQ)
    from PS_JOB D
    where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
    and D.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
    and D.EFFDT = A.EFFDT)
    and C.POSN_STATUS <> 'G'
    and C.EFFDT = (select max(E.EFFDT)
    from PS_POSITION_DATA E
    where E.POSITION_NBR = A.POSITION_NBR
    and E.EFFDT <= A.EFFDT)
    and C.EFFSEQ = (select max(F.EFFSEQ)
    from PS_POSITION_DATA F
    where F.POSITION_NBR = A.POSITION_NBR
    and F.EFFDT = C.EFFDT))
    or
    (A.POSITION_NBR = C.POSITION_NBR
    and A.EFFDT = (select max(D.EFFDT)
    from PS_JOB D
    where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
    and D.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
    and D.EFFDT <= C.EFFDT)
    and A.EFFSEQ = (select max(E.EFFSEQ)
    from PS_JOB E
    where E.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
    and E.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
    and E.EFFDT = A.EFFDT)
    and C.POSN_STATUS <> 'G'
    and C.EFFSEQ = (select max(F.EFFSEQ)
    from PS_POSITION_DATA F
    where F.POSITION_NBR = A.POSITION_NBR
    and F.EFFDT = C.EFFDT)))
    or
    (A.POSITION_NBR = ' '
    and A.EFFSEQ = (select max(E.EFFSEQ)
    from PS_JOB D
    where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
    and E.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
    and D.EFFDT = A.EFFDT)))

    Using distributive law A and (B or C) = (A and B) or (A and C) from right to left we can have:
    select distinct A.DEPTID,A.POSITION_NBR,A.EMPLID,A.EMPL_RCD_NBR,A.EFFDT,B.NAME,A.EMPL_STATUS,
                    A.JOBCODE,A.ANNUAL_RT,A.STD_HOURS,A.PRIMARY_JOB,C.POSN_STATUS,
                    case when A.POSITION_NBR = ' ' then 0 else C.STD_HOURS end,
                    case when A.POSITION_NBR = ' ' then ' ' else C.DEPTID end
      from PS_JOB A,PS_PERSONAL_DATA B,PS_POSITION_DATA C
    where A.EMPLID = B.EMPLID
       and (
             A.POSITION_NBR = C.POSITION_NBR
         and A.EFFSEQ = (select max(D.EFFSEQ)
                           from PS_JOB D
                          where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
                            and D.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
                            and D.EFFDT = A.EFFDT
         and C.EFFSEQ = (select max(F.EFFSEQ)
                           from PS_POSITION_DATA E
                          where E.POSITION_NBR = A.POSITION_NBR
                            and E.EFFDT = C.EFFDT
         and C.POSN_STATUS != 'G'
         and (
               C.EFFDT = (select max(E.EFFDT) 
                            from PS_POSITION_DATA E
                           where E.POSITION_NBR = A.POSITION_NBR
                             and E.EFFDT <= A.EFFDT
           or
               A.EFFDT = (select max(D.EFFDT) 
                            from PS_JOB D
                           where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
                             and D.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
                             and D.EFFDT <= C.EFFDT
         or
             A.POSITION_NBR = ' '
               and A.EFFSEQ = (select max(E.EFFSEQ)
                                 from PS_JOB D
                                where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
                                  and E.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
                                  and D.EFFDT = A.EFFDT
           )may not help much as the optimizer might have guessed it already
    Regards
    Etbin

  • CDHDR table query taking long time

    Hi all,
    Select query from CDHDR table is taking long time,in where condition i am giving OBJECTCLASS = 'MAT_FULL' udate = sy-datum and langu = 'EN'.
    any suggestion to improve the performance.i want to select all the article which got changed on current date
    regards
    shibu

    This will always be slow for large data volumes, since CDHDR is designed for quick access by object ID (in this case material number), not by date.
    I'm afraid you would need to introduce a secondary index on OBJECTCLAS and UDATE, if that query is crucial enough to warrant the additional disk space and processing time taken by the new index.
    Greetings
    Thomas

  • Sap bi--query taking long time to exexute

    Hi
    When i try  run the bex query ,its taking long time,please suggest
    Thanks
    sreedhar

    Hi
    When i try  run the bex query ,its taking long time,please suggest
    Thanks
    sreedhar

  • Query taking long time To Fectch the Results

    Hi!
    when I run the query,it takes too long time for fetching the resultsets.
    Please find the query below for the same.
    SELECT
    A.BUSINESS_UNIT,
    A.JOURNAL_ID,
    TO_CHAR(A.JOURNAL_DATE,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
    A.UNPOST_SEQ,
    A.FISCAL_YEAR,
    A.ACCOUNTING_PERIOD,
    A.JRNL_HDR_STATUS,
    C.INVOICE,
    C.ACCT_ENTRY_TYPE,
    C.LINE_DST_SEQ_NUM,
    C.TAX_AUTHORITY_CD,
    C.ACCOUNT,
    C.MONETARY_AMOUNT,
    D.BILL_SOURCE_ID,
    D.IDENTIFIER,
    D.VAT_AMT_BSE,
    D.VAT_TRANS_AMT_BSE,
    D.VAT_TXN_TYPE_CD,
    D.TAX_CD_VAT,
    D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT,
    D.VAT_APPLICABILITY,
    E.BILL_TO_CUST_ID,
    E.BILL_STATUS,
    E.BILL_CYCLE_ID,
    TO_CHAR(E.INVOICE_DT,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
    TO_CHAR(E.ACCOUNTING_DT,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
    TO_CHAR(E.DT_INVOICED,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
    E.ENTRY_TYPE,
    E.ENTRY_REASON,
    E.AR_LVL,
    E.AR_DST_OPT,
    E.AR_ENTRY_CREATED,
    E.GEN_AR_ITEM_FLG,
    E.GL_LVL, E.GL_ENTRY_CREATED,
    (Case when c.account in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000','30490000',
    '30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000','35160000',
    '39100050','90100000')
    and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 0 then 'Ej_Momskonto_med_moms'
    When c.account not in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000',
    '30490000','30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000',
    '35160000','39100050','90100000')
    and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 25 then 'Momskonto_utan_moms' end)
    FROM
    sysadm.PS_JRNL_HEADER A,
    sysadm.PS_JRNL_LN B,
    sysadm.PS_BI_ACCT_ENTRY C,
    sysadm.PS_BI_LINE D,
    sysadm.PS_BI_HDR E
    WHERE A.BUSINESS_UNIT = '&BU'
    AND A.JOURNAL_DATE BETWEEN TO_DATE('&From_date','YYYY-MM-DD')
    AND TO_DATE('&To_date','YYYY-MM-DD')
    AND A.SOURCE      = 'BI'
    AND A.BUSINESS_UNIT = B.BUSINESS_UNIT
    AND A.JOURNAL_ID      = B.JOURNAL_ID
    AND A.JOURNAL_DATE = B.JOURNAL_DATE
    AND A.UNPOST_SEQ      = B.UNPOST_SEQ
    AND B.BUSINESS_UNIT = C.BUSINESS_UNIT
    AND B.JOURNAL_ID = C.JOURNAL_ID
    AND B.JOURNAL_DATE = C.JOURNAL_DATE
    AND B.JOURNAL_LINE = C.JOURNAL_LINE
    AND C.ACCT_ENTRY_TYPE = 'RR'
    AND C.BUSINESS_UNIT = '&BU'
    AND C.BUSINESS_UNIT = D.BUSINESS_UNIT
    AND C.INVOICE = D.INVOICE
    AND C.LINE_SEQ_NUM = D.LINE_SEQ_NUM
    AND D.BUSINESS_UNIT = '&BU'
    AND D.BUSINESS_UNIT = E.BUSINESS_UNIT
    AND D.INVOICE = E.INVOICE
    AND E.BUSINESS_UNIT = '&BU'
    AND
    ((c.account in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000','30490000',
    '30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000','35160000',
    '39100050','90100000')
    and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 0)
    OR
    (c.account not in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000','30490000',
    '30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000','35160000',
    '39100050','z')
    and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 25)
    GROUP BY
    A.BUSINESS_UNIT,
    A.JOURNAL_ID,
    TO_CHAR(A.JOURNAL_DATE,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
    A.UNPOST_SEQ, A.FISCAL_YEAR,
    A.ACCOUNTING_PERIOD,
    A.JRNL_HDR_STATUS,
    C.INVOICE,
    C.ACCT_ENTRY_TYPE,
    C.LINE_DST_SEQ_NUM,
    C.TAX_AUTHORITY_CD,
    C.ACCOUNT,
    D.BILL_SOURCE_ID,
    D.IDENTIFIER,
    D.VAT_TXN_TYPE_CD,
    D.TAX_CD_VAT,
    D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT,
    D.VAT_APPLICABILITY,
    E.BILL_TO_CUST_ID,
    E.BILL_STATUS,
    E.BILL_CYCLE_ID,
    TO_CHAR(E.INVOICE_DT,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
    TO_CHAR(E.ACCOUNTING_DT,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
    TO_CHAR(E.DT_INVOICED,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
    E.ENTRY_TYPE, E.ENTRY_REASON,
    E.AR_LVL, E.AR_DST_OPT,
    E.AR_ENTRY_CREATED,
    E.GEN_AR_ITEM_FLG,
    E.GL_LVL,
    E.GL_ENTRY_CREATED,
    C.MONETARY_AMOUNT,
    D.VAT_AMT_BSE,
    D.VAT_TRANS_AMT_BSE
    having
    (Case when c.account in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000',
    '30490000','30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000',
    '35160000','39100050','90100000')
    and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 0 then 'Ej_Momskonto_med_moms'
    When c.account not in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000','30490000',
    '30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000','35160000',
    '39100050','90100000')
    and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 25 then 'Momskonto_utan_moms' end) is not null
    So Could you provide the solution to fix this issue?
    Thanks
    senthil

    [url http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=501834&tstart=0]When your query takes too long ...
    Regards,
    Rob.

  • Sql query taking long time

    the below query is taking very long time.
    select /*+ PARALLEL(a,8) PARALLEL(b,8) */ a.personid,a.winning_id, b.questionid from
    winning_id_cleanup a , rm_personquestion b
    where a.personid = b.personid and (a.winning_id,b.questionid) not in
    (select /*+ PARALLEL(c,8) */ c.personid,c.questionid from rm_personquestion c where c.personid=a.winning_id);
    where the rm_personquestion table is having 45 million rows and winning_id_cleanup is having 1 million rows.
    please tell me how to tune this query?

    Please post u'r query at PL/SQL
    It's not for SQL and PL/SQL

  • SQL Query taking longer time as seen from Trace file

    Below Query Execution timings:
    Any help will be benefitial as its affecting business needs.
    SELECT MATERIAL_DETAIL_ID
    FROM
    GME_MATERIAL_DETAILS WHERE BATCH_ID = :B1 FOR UPDATE OF ACTUAL_QTY NOWAIT
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.70 0 0 0 0
    Execute 2256 8100.00 24033.51 627 12298 31739 0
    Fetch 2256 900.00 949.82 0 12187 0 30547
    total 4513 9000.00 24984.03 627 24485 31739 30547
    Thanks and Regards

    Thanks Buddy.
    Data Collected from Trace file:
    SELECT STEP_CLOSE_DATE
    FROM
    GME_BATCH_STEPS WHERE BATCH_ID
    IN (SELECT
    DISTINCT BATCH_ID FROM
    GME_MATERIAL_DETAILS START WITH BATCH_ID = :B2 CONNECT BY PRIOR PHANTOM_ID=BATCH_ID)
    AND NVL(STEP_CLOSE_DATE, :B1) > :B1
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.54 0 0 0 0
    Execute 2256 800.00 1120.32 0 0 0 0
    Fetch 2256 9100.00 13551.45 396 77718 0 0
    total 4513 9900.00 14672.31 396 77718 0 0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
    Parsing user id: 66 (recursive depth: 1)
    Rows Row Source Operation
    0 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GME_BATCH_STEPS
    13160 NESTED LOOPS
    6518 VIEW
    6518 SORT UNIQUE
    53736 CONNECT BY WITH FILTERING
    30547 NESTED LOOPS
    30547 INDEX RANGE SCAN GME_MATERIAL_DETAILS_U1 (object id 146151)
    30547 TABLE ACCESS BY USER ROWID GME_MATERIAL_DETAILS
    23189 NESTED LOOPS
    53736 BUFFER SORT
    53736 CONNECT BY PUMP
    23189 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GME_MATERIAL_DETAILS
    23189 INDEX RANGE SCAN GME_MATERIAL_DETAILS_U1 (object id 146151)
    4386 INDEX RANGE SCAN GME_BATCH_STEPS_U1 (object id 146144)
    In the Package there are lots of SQL Statements using CONNECT BY CLAUSE.
    Does the use of CONNECT BY Clause degrades performance?
    As you can see the Rows Section is 0 but the Query and elapsed time is taking longer
    Regards

  • Query taking long time

    Hi
    I have a query in which, its a 3 table join but takes a long time to execute. I had checked with plan table.. it shows one of the table is FULL ACCESS.
    I have 2 clarifications.
    1. Will the status checking as NULL - (it shouldn't use index)
    2. Is the case statements are recommended for queries.
    Query
    Select .........
    FROM CLIENT LEFT OUTER JOIN INTERNET_LOGIN ON INTERNET_LOGIN.NUM_CLIENT_ID=CLIENT.NUM_CLIENT_ID,
    POLI_MOT.
    WHERE
    POLI_MOT.NUM_CLIENT_ID=CLIENT.NUM_CLIENT_ID
    AND
    (POLI_MOT.CHR_CANCEL_STATUS='N'
    OR
    POLI_MOT.CHR_CANCEL_STATUS IS NULL)
    AND
    CLIENT.NUM_CONTACT_TYPE_ID IN (1,3)
    AND
    (NVL(POLI_MOT.VCH_NEW_IC_NO,'A') =
    CASE WHEN (NVL(null,NULL) IS NULL) THEN
    NVL(POLI_MOT.VCH_NEW_IC_NO,'A')
    ELSE
    NVL(null,NULL)
    END
    OR
    POLI_MOT.VCH_OLD_IC_NO =
    CASE WHEN nvl(null,null) IS NULL THEN
    POLI_MOT.VCH_OLD_IC_NO
    ELSE
    NVL(null,NULL)
    END )
    AND POLI_MOT.VCH_POLICY_NO =
    CASE WHEN UPPER(nvl(NULL,null)) IS NULL THEN
    POLI_MOT.VCH_POLICY_NO
    ELSE
    NVL(NULL,NULL)
    END
    AND POLI_MOT.VCH_VEHICLE_NO =
    CASE WHEN UPPER(NVL('123',NULL)) IS NULL THEN
    POLI_MOT.VCH_VEHICLE_NO
    ELSE
    NVL('123',NULL)
    END

    Hi,
    There is nothing wrong in having a full table access. When you do the explain plan please check for which table costs you the maximun. try to work on that table.
    To tune the performance of your query you can try either indexing or parallel access.
    the syntax for parallel index is
    /*+ PARALLEL("TBL_NM",100) */(any number)...
    for index please use the index name of the table you want to index..
    regards
    Bharath

  • LINQ query taking long time

    Following query i write it returns me 1400 records. and below line taking much time.
    1.5 second taken by
        count = quer != null ? quer.Count() : 0;
    and 2 sec taken by
        candidateList = quer.Skip((pageIndex - 1) * pageSize).Take(pageSize).ToList();
    Please suggest.

    Hi Jon,
    In SharePoint, I suggest you use CAML Query. If you use Linq, the performance won't be gurantteed.
    For the first query, you can use SPQury.Count to achieve it, for the second query, you can build a proper CAML to filter the data.
    Here are some detailed articles for your reference:
    SPList.GetItems method (SPQuery)
    SPQuery.Query Property
    Zhengyu Guo
    TechNet Community Support

  • Query execution taking longer time in Oracle form 10g !!

    Hi,
    I'm generating a report through Oracle form ( forms 10g) and its taking 3-4 hours to finish. But when I run the same report query in (Oracle 11g) database, it gets executed in less than 40 mins.
    The form takes only from and to date as input.
    I tried hardcoring the date in the Oracle Form and then the report takes only 40 mins to generate.
    I tried various approaches like changing the datatypes of form variable and correspondingly changing the query, but met with no success.
    When the report in run through the form , we can see the query getting run in backend for nearly 3 hrs !!! tats really confusing !!
    Please let me know, if anybody got any idea on this problem??

    Hi,
    Even I am facing the same problem above. I am trying to fetch results from a cursor which has subquery running over the db link and placing the results set in a csv file using client_io package. When I run the cursor directly from database (11G), it takes not more than 3-4 min to get the results back. But when I run the same cursor via oracle forms 10G, the query in local database keep on waiting for hours to get results from remote database with "SQL*Net message from dblink". Session on local database remains in active status with state as "Waiting" while the session on remote database goes inactive with state as waiting for event "SQL*Net message from client"
    This is confusing me since the same query when ran directly from backend fetches results soon.
    Please let me know if anyone can help here
    Thanks
    Garima

  • QUERY taking longer time than usual

    Hello Gurus,
    The query below used to take 5-10 minutes depending on the resource availability, but this time it is taking 4-5 hrs to complete this transaction.
    INSERT /*+ APPEND */ INTO TAG_STAGING
    SELECT /*+ INDEX(A,ALL_tags_INDX1) */
    DISTINCT TRIM (serial) serial_num,
    TRIM (COMPANY_numBER) COMPANY_NUM,
    TRIM (PERSON_id) PERSON_id
    FROM ALL_tags@DWDB_link a
    WHERE serviceS IN (SELECT /*+ INDEX(B,service_CODES_INDX2) */
    services
    FROM service_CODES b
    WHERE srvc_cd = 'R')
    AND (ORDERDATE_date BETWEEN TO_DATE ('01-JAN-2007','dd-mon-yyyy')
    AND TO_DATE ('31-DEC-2007','dd-mon-yyyy'))
    AND ( (TRIM (status_1) IS NULL)
    OR (TRIM (status_1) = 'R')
    AND (TRIM (status_2) = 'R' OR TRIM (status_2) IS NULL)
    TAG_STAGING table is empty with primary key on the three given columns
    ALL_tags@DWDB_link table has about 100M rows
    Ideally the query should fetch about 4M rows.
    Could any one please give me an idea as to how to proceed to quicken the process.
    Thanks in advance
    Thanks,
    TT

    First I'd check the explain plan to make sure that it makes sense. Perhaps an index was dropped or perhaps the stats are wrong for some reason.
    If the explain plan looks good then I'd trace it and see where the time is being spent.

  • SELECT query taking long time

    Hi All,
    I am trying to run one SELECT statement which uses 6 tables. That query generally take 25-30 minutes to generate output.
    Today it is running from more than 2 hours. I have checked there are no locks on those tables and no other process is using them.
    What else I should check in order to figure out why my SELECT statement is taking time?
    Any help will be much appreciated.
    Thanks!

    Please let me know if you still want me to provide all the information mentioned in the link.Yes, please.
    Before you can even start optimizing, it should be clear what parts of the query are running slow.
    The links contains the steps to take regarding how to identify the things that make the query run slow.
    Ideally you post a trace/tkprof report with wait events, it'll show on what time is being spent, give an execution plan and a database version all in once...
    Today it is running from more than 2 hours. I have checked there are no locks on those tables and no other process is using them.Well, something must have changed.
    And you must indentify what exactly has changed, but it's a broad range you have to check:
    - it could be outdated table statistics
    - it could be data growth or skewness that makes Optimizer choose a wrong plan all of a sudden
    - it could be a table that got modified with some bad index
    - it could be ...
    So, by posting the information in the link, you'll leave less room for guesses from us, so you'll get an explanation that makes sense faster or, while investigating by following the steps in the link, you'll get the explanation yourself.

  • Select Query taking long time to run second time

    Hi All,
    I have Oracle 11gR1 in windows server 2008 R2 .
    I have some tables with 10 million records . When i run the select query for those tables first time it gives me result in 15 seconds but if i am running the same script second time from the same session I am getting the result in 15 minutes to complete ..
    Why it is happening? What may be the solution for this ?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Vikash jain(Junior DBA)

    Hi Mohamed,
    I just saw that both the times for the same query execution plan is different ..
    here are the details :
    First time Second Time
    g84m3qqjv2p3q g84m3qqjv2p3q
    2733045235 1310485984
    So plz tell me how should i force database to use the first execution plan ?
    I got this script for forcing the Db to use the same execution plan
    accept sql_id -
    prompt 'Enter value for sql_id: ' -
    default 'X0X0X0X0'
    accept plan_hash_value -
    prompt 'Enter value for plan_hash_value: ' -
    default 'X0X0X0X0'
    accept fixed -
    prompt 'Enter value for fixed (NO): ' -
    default 'NO'
    accept enabled -
    prompt 'Enter value for enabled (YES): ' -
    default 'YES'
    accept plan_name -
    prompt 'Enter value for plan_name (ID_sqlid_planhashvalue): ' -
    default 'X0X0X0X0'
    set feedback off
    set sqlblanklines on
    set serveroutput on
    declare
    l_plan_name varchar2(40);
    l_old_plan_name varchar2(40);
    l_sql_handle varchar2(40);
    ret binary_integer;
    l_sql_id varchar2(13);
    l_plan_hash_value number;
    l_fixed varchar2(3);
    l_enabled varchar2(3);
    major_release varchar2(3);
    minor_release varchar2(3);
    begin
    select regexp_replace(version,'\..*'), regexp_substr(version,'[0-9]+',1,2) into major_release, minor_release from v$instance;
    minor_release := 2;
    l_sql_id := '&&sql_id';
    l_plan_hash_value := to_number('&&plan_hash_value');
    l_fixed := '&&fixed';
    l_enabled := '&&enabled';
    ret := dbms_spm.load_plans_from_cursor_cache(
    sql_id=>l_sql_id,
    plan_hash_value=>l_plan_hash_value,
    fixed=>l_fixed,
    enabled=>l_enabled);
    if minor_release = '1' then
    -- 11gR1 has a bug that prevents renaming Baselines
    dbms_output.put_line(' ');
    dbms_output.put_line('Baseline created.');
    dbms_output.put_line(' ');
    else
    -- This statements looks for Baselines create in the last 4 seconds
    select sql_handle, plan_name,
    decode('&&plan_name','X0X0X0X0','SQLID_'||'&&sql_id'||'_'||'&&plan_hash_value','&&plan_name')
    into l_sql_handle, l_old_plan_name, l_plan_name
    from dba_sql_plan_baselines spb
    where created > sysdate-(1/24/60/15);
    ret := dbms_spm.alter_sql_plan_baseline(
    sql_handle=>l_sql_handle,
    plan_name=>l_old_plan_name,
    attribute_name=>'PLAN_NAME',
    attribute_value=>l_plan_name);
    dbms_output.put_line(' ');
    dbms_output.put_line('Baseline '||upper(l_plan_name)||' created.');
    dbms_output.put_line(' ');
    end if;
    end;
    undef sql_id
    undef plan_hash_value
    undef plan_name
    undef fixed
    set feedback on
    Output:
    Enter value for sql_id: g84m3qqjv2p3q
    Enter value for plan_hash_value: 2733045235
    Enter value for fixed (NO):
    Enter value for enabled (YES):
    Enter value for plan_name (ID_sqlid_planhashvalue): g84m3qqjv2p3q
    old 16: l_sql_id := '&&sql_id';
    new 16: l_sql_id := 'g84m3qqjv2p3q';
    old 17: l_plan_hash_value := to_number('&&plan_hash_value');
    new 17: l_plan_hash_value := to_number('2733045235');
    old 18: l_fixed := '&&fixed';
    new 18: l_fixed := 'NO';
    old 19: l_enabled := '&&enabled';
    new 19: l_enabled := 'YES';
    old 40: decode('&&plan_name','X0X0X0X0','SQLID_'||'&&sql_id'||'_'||'&&plan_hash_value','&&plan_name')
    new 40: decode('g84m3qqjv2p3q','X0X0X0X0','SQLID_'||'g84m3qqjv2p3q'||'_'||'2733045235','g84m3qqjv2p3q')
    declare
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01403: no data found
    ORA-06512: at line 39
    Kindly help me to resolve the issue ..
    Thanks & Regards,
    Vikash Jain(Junior DBA)

  • COEP table query taking longer time

    Hi ABAP guru's,
    I have a problem with the performance of a Select query on table COEP(91 million records in QA),
    i want to tune the program for better performance.
    Presenlty it took nearly 6 hrs to execute the program in Background, if in foreground givig dump with
    message for maximum time exceed.
    the code which exists in the program is
    SELECT WOGBTR OBJNR KSTAR OWAER PERIO FROM COEP
       INTO  TABLE T_COEP
          WHERE KOKRS = P_KOKRS AND
           OBJNR IN R_COSTCENTER  AND   
           KSTAR IN R_COSTELEMENT AND   
           PERIO LE P_PERIO       AND   
          GJAHR EQ G_YEAR.
    I am in a support project and i need to fix this issue ASAP plz help me out in tuning the program.
    I have seen some other posts in the forum for similar issues, the outcome of that is to use LEDNR = '00'.
    I am not sure if this works for me or not.
    I cant take chance of trail and error , as it has to move to QA untill i know the status of the change and it takes a minimum of week time.
    Regards
    Sunil kumar

    Hi Experts,
    I got a similiar issue, though I follow code specified above still the performance is slow. Please suggest what need to be done.
    select dintinct objnr
                         uspob
                INTO TABLE lt_srcc
                FROM coep
                WHERE kokrs  EQ 'ESAM'
                AND perio EQ p_period
                AND lednr = gc_00
    *          AND objnr  LIKE 'KSESAM%'
                AND gjahr EQ p_fisyr
                AND kstar  LIKE '0000901%'
                AND vrgng  EQ 'RKIU'
                AND uspob LIKE 'KSESAM%'
                %_HINTS ORACLE 'INDEX("COEP" "COEP~1")'.
    Thanks
    Chandramouli

Maybe you are looking for

  • Regarding Maxsize of Undo Tablespace

    Dear expetrs While executing a procedure i got error. Error In Insertion..ORA-30036: unable to extend segment by 16384 in undo tablesp ace 'UNDOTBS1' then i increase the size of the Undo Tablespace then again i got error. ORA-01144: File size (768000

  • I'm having trouble staying connected to the internet

    I'm having trouble "staying" connected to the internet.

  • FlashPro Output  - Search Feature

    I am using RHv6, my output is FlashPro, I was wondering if there was a simple way to change the outcome of searches. I located a article that stated if the whfhost.js file was changed with one line of code var rg = new RegExp(gsCW,"ig"); that the res

  • Generate bar codes in smartforms

    Hi, I wonder to know how can I add bar codes to a smartform. Bar codes should be generated in a automatic sequence and its number should be printed too. Thanks a lot, Nuno Moreira

  • Running low on system memory?

    Help! I'm trying to edit a new project in Premiere Pro CS3, and it keeps crashing on me. The footage was shot using a Sony HDR-XR500V camcorder. The footage was given to me on a thumb drive saved as .mpg files. I'm converting the files to .avi format