Query to compare different Plan versions in CCA

My requirement is to create a Cost Center query that compares two different plan versions, selected by the user with different time periods. We do not use any SEM functionality and are in version 3.0B.
There is a standard R3 report but this gives a total figure and does not split the figures by periods.
Does anyone know a Business Content query that can resolve this issue?

Hi ,
Instead of going for a business content query u can go for a formula variable using replacement path and assign the required values for the output and in that by using the customer exit with the help of abapers
Hope this will be a clear solution to ur problem
Pls assign full points if answer is satisfied
Regards ,
Subash Balakrishann

Similar Messages

  • Costing on Internal Orders with different plan versions

    Hi,
    Is it possible to carry out Costing on Internal Orders using different plan versions?
    I would like to carry out more than one costing on Internal Order so that I could compare different versions. Maybe there are other parameters (other than plan versions) which can be used for executing different parallel costing.
    Best wishes,
    Karol

    Hi Karol,
    In Release 3.0, the following new planning functions are available in order planning:
    <b>Copy plan versions</b>
    In Release 3.0, you can plan order costs for internal orders in different versions. In contrast to earlier releases, you can now
    1. change versions
    2. copy versions
    3. Here you can select :
                                 the planned values to be copied: annual or total values
                                 whether the planned values in the target version are to be retained or overwritten compare versions using the information system
    Planned values are not revaluated in the target version (for example, when you change the value date).
    Overhead and settlements are not copied and, if required, must be repeated in the target version
    Regards,
    Hemachandra K S
    <b>Please, donot forget to mark the answer as Helpful, Very Helpful or Problem solved.</b>

  • CK11n with activity prices from different plan versions

    Hello,
    We are looking for a simple & practical way to calculate a standard cost estimate for a material using activity prices from different CO plan version.
    In the valuation variant of the costing variant the CO plan version is determined from where the activity prices are taken, eg version 0
    So, we want to cost the same material using the activity prices of a different plan version, eg 90, or 91 ... but without using a different costing variant per CO plan version(so without having to create/customize a separate costing variant per CO plan version)
    Is this possible? 
    Can we use costing versions in this respect?
    Many thanks
    Alain

    Hi,
    Thanks for quick feedback ... but how do you assign this valuation variant in the costing version... ?
    Can you enter is in CK11n? or what transaction needs to be customized?
    Thanks, Alain

  • Compare different project versions for material components?

    hi all,
    is it possible to display and compare different project versions for material components in different COLUMNS? i want to be able to view the data for each version in a different column.. currently i can view the different data per version but it is arranged  by ROW but i want to know if its possible to have different layout/report showing the different versions in separate columns
    Thanks in advance..
    Edited by: Ramesh on Sep 15, 2008 5:58 AM

    hi,
    thanks but this is not the report im looking for.. i wonder if its possible to show a report similar to CNMM or CN53N wherein the different project version data can be displayed side by side as columns?
    again, thanks in advance and regards..

  • Different plan version for some scenarios in MSS

    Hi guys,
    Some scenarios of the MSS need to be referenced to another plan version different than the current active.
    Then, I'm trying to configuring my Object and Data Provider with the requisites needed. The issue is that how can I tell the system that the plan version is another one??
    Any idea??
    Thanks for your answers.

    Firstly, try to check whether the correct smartform is getting picked or a different form is getting picked. TO identify, set soft break-point inside your program lines or use SF_TRACE.
    If it is still picking the same smartform, and it is not showing your changes.. then goto form attributes and check whether it is translated to all languages or not?
    I guess, because of one of the above two problems it is not displaying your form correctly.
    Regards,
    SR

  • Query design question: multiple plan versions in single column

    I have a standard financial statement query with current month "Actual" restricted to Value Type 10 and current month "Plan" using Value Type 20.  This scenario is repeated for year-to-date Actual and Plan along with $ and % variance calculations.   Until recently we were only loading plan version so I had no reason to restrict the plan to version 0 Actual/Plan.
    We are now loading an alternate plan version, Version 1, and I would like to report both versions in the same query.  I though I could just bring in "Version" as a Free Characteristic to easily switch between version 0 and 1 but that didn't work as expected. 
    With "Version" as a filter item my Plan amount will report both plan versions combined which is fine and when "Version" is filtered to the alternate version 1 Plan correctly displays the alternate amount, in both cases Actual is unchanged and displays correctly.   The problem is when I change the filter to just show Version 0 which is defined as "Actual/Plan".  When version 0 is selected the Plan amount displays correctly but ALL Actual values disappear.
    No Version filter set = Actual/Plan and Plan Version 1 combined correctly.   Actual displays correctly.
    Filter set to 1 and 0  = Actual/Plan and Plan Version 1 combined correctly.   Actual displays correctly.
    Filter set to 1 = Plan Version 1 only.  Actual displays correctly.
    Filter set to 0 = Plan Version 0 only.  No actual data is displayed.
    Is there a better way of displaying multiple plan versions in a query or will I have to add additional columns for each plan version?
    Thanks for the ideas,
    Jeff

    Thanks Amit that was the help I needed.
    I added "Version" to every actual Key Figure and made each a Constant Selection.  I also added Version as a Free Characteristic of the query for a filter.
    By adding Version to each Key Figure no matter which plan version I select in the Version filter Actual data alway remains correct and just my Plan column changes to show the plan version I selected.
    Thanks for your help,
    Jeff
    Edited by: Jeff Mayfield on Nov 11, 2009 11:51 PM

  • HR Org Replication into different plan version in SRM

    Dear SRM Gurus,
    I have an org plan in HR (Plan Version 01) which I want to replicate into a newly created plan version "EL" in SRM. But this at the moment is not my "current plan version". So only after replication is successfully I want to change "current plan version" in SRM from "01" to "EL".
    Question: is there any place where I can decide, into which SRM plan version I want to replicate my HR Org-Plan into?
    Thanks and kind regards
    Julian

    You can implement this badi HRALE00OUTBOUND_IDOC and set dummy addresses. Or put a filter at the model view for the infotype 0006
    Regards, IA

  • DIFFERENT PLAN VERSIONS (NEWBIE ?S)

    HI FOLKS,
    PLZ COULD SOMEONE BRIEF ME ABOUT PLAN VERSIONS LIKE 0,1,99.
    DIFFERENTIATE PALN VALUES VS FORCAST VALUES
    I KNOW THEY ARE KIND OF SILLY QUESTIONS DESERVE NOT BE POSTED IN THIS EXPERT FORUM (.^.)
    BUT ...
    REGARDS,
    AXEL

    Usually version 0 is actual version
    You can create as many verions as you like, but give meaningfull text to the versions, so that you know what those versions are used for.
    In most places, plan and forecast are interchangabily used. Budgetting is usually yearly planning. Forecasting is usually rolling and monthly planning. Depending on the company you have 1 year, 3 year, 5 year planning / forecasting. It is always better to ask the people you are working with as to what the terminology used at their site.
    Hope this helps.
    NS

  • Using a different Plan Version in WIP calculation

    Hi experts.
    I am using version 97 as plan in a wip calculation. The problem is that to recognize plan incomings my system uses version 0 and in the result analysis they always appear as 0 because the version the system is taking to recover the planned incomings is 97 and it is empty.
    Is there any standard way to make it take version 97 only for costs?.
    Thanks.
    Alex

    yes. this is true, the predicates are not preserved, I found that out after posting. ok, Im really thinking bug here, I'll explain further.
    Im outside of prod time so can run the mview. the plan is pretty big so not going to post just yet, its just behavioural at this stage.
    explain for QUERY, = plan good.
    create table t1 as QUERY = plan good.
    insert to table as QUERY = plan good
    create mview as QUERY = plan bad. Not just timings are bad, the plan has completely changed. I stop the mview creation at this stage. good old ctrl+c.
    the only thing thats different is Im running MVIEW create. So I hit my ADDM again, can see the bad plan and bad timings. So I get the SQL_ID from the ADDM for the bad plan and run a 10053 on it using the 11.2 sqldiag dump. Im hoping to see why its choosing the bad path
    execute DBMS_SQLDIAG.DUMP_TRACE(p_sql_id=>'576wpd5g73q9c', p_child_number=>0, p_component=>'Compiler', p_file_id=>'BAD1');
    edit my BAD1 10053 trace file and I see...the plan is GOOD. Its estimated 2 seconds to run for the SQL_ID thats actually bad when running.
    This is why Im thinking bug.

  • How to compare the simulation version

    Dear Experts,
    For Operative Projects we can create Simulation Versions (CJV1 / CJV4) & Project Version (CN72).
    We can compare different Project Versions with Operative Project (S_ALR_87013539 / 38).
    Similarly can we compare Simulation version with Operative Project?
    OR can we see plan cost report for simulation version?
    Please guide.
    Rajesh

    Hi,
    Simulation versions are not meant for comparison purpose. You can use Project versions for that, which are snapshots of project at that point of time.
    Simulation versions can be used to analyse 'what-if' conditions and for quotation ie pre-order analysis. Before receipt of sales order, you can create simulation project and do cost planning for quotation purpose. After receipt of sales order, this project can be made operative. In case of loss of project, you can delete simulation.
    Another case can be during execution you want to check "what happens if" kind of conditions. you can transfer operative project to simulation version, simulate reqd condition. If results are desirable, you can copy the simulation version onto current project or alternatively delete simulation.
    Regards

  • Plan Version

    Hi All,
    Can you please explain the concept and use of Plan Version.
    Regards,
    Chinmay

    Identifies the organizational plan you are currently working with by providing a short description of the plan.  from F1
    go to oopv transaction and create the different plan version
    2. then go to table T77S0 and set current plan version to plogi plogi
    3. go to transaction ppom_old here in settings you can choose current plan or any other plan.
    4. if you want to copy exsisting org structure to other plan version see the report: RE_RHCOPL00
    Plan Version Contains a one or two alphanumeric key which differentiates between
    scenarions in you organizational plan.
    Organizational Management allows you to manage scenarios in parallel in
    various plan versions.
    It basically defines which  plan of the org structure to use.Suppose if want one current org structure (say A)and one org structure for future( say B) after 2 years,then we take 01 ie current plan as assign to the org structure A and assign 02 to org structure B.This will say that A is the current plan and if want an alternative plan its B. Hope i am clear
    Edited by: Sikindar on May 2, 2009 11:28 AM

  • COPA plan version

    Currently, only version 0 is used for actuals and plan.  Again this year we have used version 0 for cost center planning, profit center planning and also COPA planning.  The user community would like to create a new version for COPA planning only to upload new data.  Can I have a different plan version # for COPA only for this year?  If so, how do I do that?  Does it impact the other areas of planning?
    Thanks for your help!

    Hi,
    Did you checked infoobject 0version??
    Just check it
    I think it is of char 1.
    Thanks
    Ajeet

  • Plan Versions in SAP HR

    What are the uses of Plan Versions? I can see current plan version that is active If I would like to create two plan versions suppose say Current Plan Version 01 and 02 for Future Plan Version? What will be the use if i go for versions? Iam bit confused on this It may sound simple still this making me confused...
    Experts please throw some light on this

    Hi,
    The current plan version should be "01", as set in PLOGI PLOGI.  This plan is what is updated whenever personnel changes are made in the system and represents your current organization. 
    Another verison could be used to create a "future state" or a "what if" scenario.  For example you can have a version for a 20% decrease in the work force.   Or a 20% increase in the workforce.  Or if your company acquired another company. Then what would your reporting structures be?  You could build each in a different plan version to see. 
    Then, if one of your scenarios came to be true and you wanted to utilize that structure, you could make that plan version the active version and all relationships would change to that new "current" plan version.  Even if they never come true, the various plan versions can be utilized by management for "what if" scenarios. 
    An example of one that could actually happen, say your company acquired another company, but the deal would not be final until July 1st.  Your management wants to build the org structure so they can see what it will look like July 1st, but you are not make any changes to the current structure until then.  You could create a new plan version by copying the current structure, then add the new company and changing the relationships as necessary.  Once management has approved this version, you would make it the "current " version in PLOGI PLOGI on July 1st and all the relationships and new assignments would now be active and seen in the structure and in PA. 
    Paul

  • Copying One Plan Version to Another Plan Version

    Hi Experts,
    When  I am copying one plan version to target plan version by using the transaction RE_RHCOPL00,
    I am getting waring as the target version is not empty.
    I have checked the tables HRP1000,HRP1001 but no objects exists for the target planversion.
    Secondly I am getting waring also Number Assignment is not for all plan versions.
    My requirement is to copy 3 different plan version into one plan version.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    IFF

    Archana,
    Thanx for the prompt the  response.
    My  concern is the  I have three different plan versions ( division wise) , I need to copy all the 3 plan version into one tranget plan version ( which is not active).
    But in Quality and Development system we have  table T77S0  with the entry 05 for the Numrg and Comp.
    Should I assign the same in prodution.
    I am sure that 3 different plan versions have unique numbers.Please advice what to do.
    Regards,
    IFF

  • Oracle Sql Query issue Running on Different DB Version

    Hello All,
    I have come into situation where we are pruning sql queries on different DB version of Oracle and have performance issue. Let me tell you in brief and i really appreciate for your prompt response as its very imperative stuff.
    I have a query which is running on a DB of version 7.3.4 and it takes around 30 mins where as the same query when run on 8i it takes 15sec., its a huge difference. I have run the statistics to analyze on 7.3 and its comparatively very high. Question here is, the sql query trys to select data from same schema table and 2 tables from another DB using DB link and 2 other tables from another DB using DB link.So,how can we optimize this stuff and achieve this run as same time as 8i DB in 7.3. Hope i am clear about my question, Eagerly waiting for your replies.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Message was edited by:
    Ram8

    Difficult to be sure without any more detailed information, but I suspect that O7 is in effect copying the remote tables to local temp space, then joining; 8i is factoring out a better query to send to the remote DBs, which does as much work as possible on the remote DB before shipping remaining rows back to local.
    You should be able to use EXPLAIN PLAN to identify what SQL is being shipped to the remote DB, If you can't (and it's been quite a while since I tried DB links or O7) then get the remote DBs to yourself, and set SQL_TRACE on for the remote instances. Execute the query and then examine the remote trace files, And don't forget to turn off the tracing when you're done.
    Of course it could just be that the CBO got better,,,
    HTH - if not, post your query and plans for the local db, and the remote queries.
    Regards Nigel

Maybe you are looking for

  • A sample Pro*C cannot run

    Hi, On the document Pro*C/C++ Precompiler Programmer's Guide Release 8.1.5 (Oracle 8i Document), a sample Pro*C program sample9.pc is introduced as an example for calling a stored PL/SQL subprogram. The SQL script to create a package containing store

  • ISR as CUBE and Voice Gateway

    Can I set an ISR 2951 as CUBE to receive SIP trunks and configure the same box as voice gateway to deliver TDM E1 voice channels to an enterprise PBx? Thanks Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

  • IDOC is not working

    Hi, We have 2 company codes and for the intercompany trade we are using IDOC to send invoices between the companies - it works perfect. Now we have added a third company code and the IDOC functionality does not work for intercompany trade involving t

  • Synchronize Illustrator CS4 documents

    Hi to everyone, I would like to know if is it possible to synchronize text or graphic styles in Illustrator documents? I'm working on a new release of my company Tecnical Data Sheets and I need to change some styled (Paragraph styles) texts in a hund

  • My iphone was working fine this morning after I did the iOS 7.3 update but I just took a call and now it's completely shut off and won't turn back on. Coincidence?

    My boyfriend and I both have iphone4's and we both did the 7.3 update this morning.  My phone is still working properly but his just shut off after he'd taken a call and now he can't get it to turn back on.  Coincidence?  He's not dropped it or gotte