Query using binding help?!?!

I am fairly new to the world of SQL and I am having a problem with a query using binding. I am using SQL Developer (3.1.07).
If I run the query with no bindings, everything works fine. On normal occasions I run this query on the day I want my totals and I achieve my desired results:
SELECT SA.CRAFT,nvl(SUM (SA.LABORHRS),0) as "Loaded Hours"
FROM SOL_SCHEDULEBASELINEWOASGMNT SA
LEFT JOIN SOL_SCHEDULEBASELINE SB ON SB.BASELINEID = SA.BASELINEID
WHERE SB.DATECODE = 'DAILY'
AND TO_CHAR(SB.FROMDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY') = TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY')
AND TO_CHAR(SB.TODATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY') = TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY')
AND TO_CHAR(SA.SCHEDULEDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY') = TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY')
group by sa.craft
order by sa.craft asc
CRAFT     Loaded Hours
CONTR.     24
MM     12
MT     6
BUT* I want to be able to enter my own date instead of using sysdate. This will be for if I miss running this for a day, am asked for the values from a previous date, etc...
The value will always be the same date for all three date fields(SB.FROMDATE,SB.TODATE,SA.SCHEDULEDATE)
I've modified the query to here and the query still works great at this stage: (I'm using 01-APR-2012 in my binding...)
SELECT SA.CRAFT,nvl(SUM (SA.LABORHRS),0) as "Loaded Hours"
FROM SOL_SCHEDULEBASELINEWOASGMNT SA
LEFT JOIN SOL_SCHEDULEBASELINE SB ON SB.BASELINEID = SA.BASELINEID
WHERE SB.DATECODE = 'DAILY'
AND SB.FROMDATE = :DDMONYYYY
AND SB.TODATE = :DDMONYYYY
AND TO_CHAR(SA.SCHEDULEDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY') = TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY')
group by sa.craft
order by sa.craft asc
CRAFT     Loaded Hours
CONTR.     24
MM     12
MT     6
The instant I change my query to the following I get a different result:
SELECT SA.CRAFT,nvl(SUM (SA.LABORHRS),0) as "Loaded Hours"
FROM SOL_SCHEDULEBASELINEWOASGMNT SA
LEFT JOIN SOL_SCHEDULEBASELINE SB ON SB.BASELINEID = SA.BASELINEID
WHERE SB.DATECODE = 'DAILY'
AND SB.FROMDATE = :DDMONYYYY
AND SB.TODATE = :DDMONYYYY
AND SA.SCHEDULEDATE = :DDMONYYYY
group by sa.craft
order by sa.craft asc
CRAFT     Loaded Hours
CONTR.     10
All columns have a data_type of Date.
As soon as I change SA.SCHEDULEDATE from
AND TO_CHAR(SA.SCHEDULEDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY') = TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY')
to
SA.SCHEDULEDATE = :DDMMYYYY
it stops returning the results I need.
Why is this? Does anyone have an idea of what is going on here? Any help would be GREATLY appreciated!
Thank You

Cook wrote:
I am fairly new to the world of SQL and I am having a problem with a query using binding. I am using SQL Developer (3.1.07).
If I run the query with no bindings, everything works fine. On normal occasions I run this query on the day I want my totals and I achieve my desired results:
SELECT SA.CRAFT,nvl(SUM (SA.LABORHRS),0) as "Loaded Hours"
FROM SOL_SCHEDULEBASELINEWOASGMNT SA
LEFT JOIN SOL_SCHEDULEBASELINE SB ON SB.BASELINEID = SA.BASELINEID
WHERE SB.DATECODE = 'DAILY'
AND TO_CHAR(SB.FROMDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY') = TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY')
AND TO_CHAR(SB.TODATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY') = TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY')
AND TO_CHAR(SA.SCHEDULEDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY') = TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY')
group by sa.craft
order by sa.craft asc
CRAFT     Loaded Hours
CONTR.     24
MM     12
MT     6
BUT* I want to be able to enter my own date instead of using sysdate. This will be for if I miss running this for a day, am asked for the values from a previous date, etc...
The value will always be the same date for all three date fields(SB.FROMDATE,SB.TODATE,SA.SCHEDULEDATE)
I've modified the query to here and the query still works great at this stage: (I'm using 01-APR-2012 in my binding...)
SELECT SA.CRAFT,nvl(SUM (SA.LABORHRS),0) as "Loaded Hours"
FROM SOL_SCHEDULEBASELINEWOASGMNT SA
LEFT JOIN SOL_SCHEDULEBASELINE SB ON SB.BASELINEID = SA.BASELINEID
WHERE SB.DATECODE = 'DAILY'
AND SB.FROMDATE = :DDMONYYYY
AND SB.TODATE = :DDMONYYYY
AND TO_CHAR(SA.SCHEDULEDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY') = TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY')
group by sa.craft
order by sa.craft asc
CRAFT     Loaded Hours
CONTR.     24
MM     12
MT     6
The instant I change my query to the following I get a different result:
SELECT SA.CRAFT,nvl(SUM (SA.LABORHRS),0) as "Loaded Hours"
FROM SOL_SCHEDULEBASELINEWOASGMNT SA
LEFT JOIN SOL_SCHEDULEBASELINE SB ON SB.BASELINEID = SA.BASELINEID
WHERE SB.DATECODE = 'DAILY'
AND SB.FROMDATE = :DDMONYYYY
AND SB.TODATE = :DDMONYYYY
AND SA.SCHEDULEDATE = :DDMONYYYY
group by sa.craft
order by sa.craft asc
CRAFT     Loaded Hours
CONTR.     10
All columns have a data_type of Date.
As soon as I change SA.SCHEDULEDATE from
AND TO_CHAR(SA.SCHEDULEDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY') = TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'DD-MON-YYYY')
to
SA.SCHEDULEDATE = :DDMMYYYY
it stops returning the results I need.
Why is this? Does anyone have an idea of what is going on here? Any help would be GREATLY appreciated!
Thank YouWhat are the datatypes involved?
It is likely that you are being impacted by implicit datatype conversion.
Realize that you can only enter strings; so you need to use TO_DATE() to convert string to DATE.

Similar Messages

SQL Query using bind variables

Hi All,
Can any one please explain me how oracle will parse the below substr query using the bind varaibles, just want to know what oracle does in the backend when processing the below substr query.
SUBSTR(:CDR_RT,3,7)
Regards,
Deepti

All queries are processed in the same way.
The example I've used on this article: PL/SQL 101 : Cursors and SQL Projection
demonstrates the steps that a query/cursor goes through.
If you're wondering if the SUBSTR in your query is applied to the value being bound in, _before_ the query is executed, then you are mistaken, the value is bound in as it is, and the substr takes place as part of the execution of the query.

Regarding usage of constants while using bind variables

Hi All,
Can some one please help me out of this situation?
I wrote a query in a package in which i am using bind variables for faster execution of the query in loops.
In the above said scenario i am trying to insert a set of data into a table say 'A' by selecting from some other table say 'B'. But i also need to insert some data which is constant.
Something like this:
constant_val varchar2(1):='N';
for i in 1 .. tab.count
loop
insert into A(Col1, Col2) values (select constant_val, B.value from B where B.value = tab(i));
end loop;
I wrote the query using bind variables in the manner:
for i in 1 .. tab.count
loop
execute immediate 'insert into A(Col1, Col2) values (select constant_val, B.value from B where B.value = :1)' using tab(i);
end loop;
This compiles, but does not run ... error said is PLSQL statement not properly ended.
I also tried the option of giving constant_value in the using clause and replacing the same in query using a bind variable. It still doesnt work.
Is there someway by which i can squeeze in the constant value also. Can someone please advise me on this?
Thanks in advance,
Praveen G S

but i was told that if i succeed
in reducing the hard parsing of queries .. i will get
better performance results .. Would i say too, at least for OLTP like systems
but if i cant or rather dont have to use it while
looping PLSQL tables and accessing data from other
tables using this data ... then what do we use it
for?? PL SQL is capable of bulk operations, so loop is less performant method to process data, however, if you can't do it bulk - for whatever reasons - do it in loop.
My remark was related mostly to dynamic sql, as shoblock already said, it seems to be no reason in your code to use dynamic sql, if you can use static...
What i not understand as well, why do you select a value from the table, if this value is already in your collection?
values (select constant_val, B.value from B where B.value = :1)' using tab(i);Best regards
Maxim

Query don't use the right index when using bind variables

Hi people !
I need some help because I have an issue with a query that don t use the right Indexes as it should
First of all, I have mainly three tables :
ORDER : Table that contains description for each Order (approximately 1 000 000 Records)
ORDER_MVTS : Table that contains the tasks made (called movements) to set up each Orders
with quantity of packages prepared for each product (approximately 10 000 000 Records)
PRODUCT : Tables that contains the products (approximately 50 000 Records)
When I launch the query with hard coded values, it brings back response very fast
because it uses the right index (ORDER_DHR_VALID) which represent the date and hour of the order
(with format 'DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'). The selectivity for this index is good.
NB 1: I have to use the trick " >= Trunc(date) and < trunc(date) +1 " to filter on a simple date because
the index contains hour and minutes (I know it wasn't probably a bright idea at conception time).
NB 2: The index on ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE is'nt discriminating enough because there is'nt enough different products.
It's the same for index on CUSTOMER_CODE and on MVT_TYPE so only the index on ORDER.DHR_VALID is good.
Here is the correct explain plan when I execute the query with hard coded values :
SELECT SUM(ORDER_MVTS.NB_PACKAGE)
FROM ORDER_MVTS, PRODUCT, ORDER
WHERE ORDER.DHR_VALID >= TRUNC(to_date('14/11/2008 10:04:56','DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'))
AND ORDER.DHR_VALID < TRUNC(to_date('14/11/2008 10:04:56','DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS')) + 1
AND ORDER_MVTS.MVT_TYPE = 'DELIVERY'
AND PRODUCT.CODE = ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE
AND ORDER_MVTS.ORDER_CODE = ORDER.CODE
AND ORDER.CUSTOMER_CODE = 'ADIDAS'
AND PRODUCT.CODE = 1234
Rows Row Source Operation
1 SORT AGGREGATE
2 NESTED LOOPS
4 NESTED LOOPS
2 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 378548) --> PRODUCT_PK
4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER
777 INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 378119) --> ORDER_DHR_VALID
2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER_MVTS
30 INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 377784) --> ORDER_MVTS_ORDER_FK
Now the problem is when the query is used in a Cursor with bind variables.
It seems like Oracle don't use index on ORDER.DHR_VALID because he can't figure out that he have
to actually filter on a short period of time (only one day).
So Oracle uses the index on ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE which is'nt a bright idea (it takes 10 secondes instead of just one)
Here is the bad explain plan :
Rows Row Source Operation
1 SORT AGGREGATE
2 NESTED LOOPS
722 NESTED LOOPS
2 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 378548) --> PRODUCT_PK
722 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER_MVTS
1790 INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 377777) --> ORDER_MVTS_PRODUCT_FK
2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER
1442 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 378439) --> ORDER_PK
Now I have found two solutions to this problem :
1) using a Hint to force the use of index on ORDER.DHR_VALID (with /*+ INDEX(ORDER ORDER_DHR_VALID) */ )
2) Using Dynamic SQL and keeping the date hard coded (but not the other values except mvt_type)
For example :
QUERY :=
'SELECT SUM(ORDER_MVTS.NB_PACKAGE)
FROM ORDER_MVTS, PRODUCT, ORDER
WHERE ORDER.DHR_VALID >= TRUNC(TO_DATE('''||To_char(P_DTE_VAL,'DD/MM/YYYY')||''',''DD/MM/YYYY'')) '||
AND ORDER.DHR_VALID < TRUNC(TO_DATE('''||To_char(P_DTE_VAL,'DD/MM/YYYY')||''',''DD/MM/YYYY'')) + 1 '||
AND ORDER_MVTS.MVT_TYPE = 'DELIVERY'
AND PRODUCT.CODE = ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE
AND ORDER_MVTS.ORDER_CODE = ORDER.CODE
AND ORDER.CUSTOMER_CODE = :CUSTOMER
AND PRODUCT.CODE = :CODE ';
These two solutions work but Number 1 is bad in theory because it uses a Hint
and Number 2 may be difficult to code.
So my question is : Does someone knows another solution to force the use of index ORDER_DHR_VALID that can be simple and reliable.
Thank you very much for support
Edited by: remaï on Apr 1, 2009 4:08 PM

What version of oracle you have? CBO work is different in 9i and 10g.
Usually cost based optimizer do not want to use index for >< condition with binding variables because optimizer can not use statistic to determine selectivity, and by default selectivity of <> operators is low.
(As I remember '>' selectivity by default is 5%, you have two conditions > and <, therefore resulting selectivity will be 0.05*0.05=0.0025 as two independent events, but selectivity of other conditions
ORDER_MVTS.MVT_TYPE = 'DELIVERY' or ORDER.CUSTOMER_CODE = 'ADIDAS' looks much better for CBO)
The best solution I see is do not use binding variables. Actually your query looks as searching query, which executes not so often, therefore you will not have perfomance win along of skipping execution plan creation.
Edited by: JustasVred on Apr 1, 2009 10:10 AM

How to use : bind character in DB adapter Select Query SOA11g. Getting Error code :17003 .java.sql.SQLException: Invalid column index error

Hi All,
The Actual query to perform is below.
SELECT name,number from emp WHERE CASE WHEN :1='T' AND term_date IS Not NULL THEN 1 WHEN :1='A' AND term_date IS NULL THEN 1 WHEN :1='ALL' THEN 1 ELSE 1 END = 1;
I have tried in DB adapter like below as a parameter for :1 as #vInputParam
SELECT name,number from emp WHERE CASE WHEN #vInputParam='T' AND term_date IS Not NULL THEN 1 WHEN #vInputParam='A' AND term_date IS NULL THEN 1 WHEN #vInputParam='ALL' THEN 1 ELSE 1 END = 1;
Getting Error code :17003 .java.sql.SQLException: Invalid column index error.
Please suggest me on using ':' bind character in DB adapter Select Query SOA11g.
Can someone help me on this please?
Thanks,
Hari

Hi,
Could you please make sure your binding style(Oracle Positional,Oracle named..etc) of the Seeded VO and Custom Vo are same.
This is the option you will get when you are extending your vo. So make sure that both are same.
You can refer the below link too
VO extension leads to "Invalid column index" exception
Thanks
Bharat

Query taking too long when using bind variable

Hi All,
There is a query in our prod DB which runs very slow (approx 2 hours) when it uses Bind Variables (using JDBC thin client), and when i try passing the variable using TOAD/SQL developer it runs fine.
Explain Plan for running Query
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 146 Bytes: 379 Cardinality: 1
     21 SORT ORDER BY Cost: 146 Bytes: 379 Cardinality: 1
          20 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 145 Bytes: 379 Cardinality: 1
               17 HASH JOIN Cost: 22 Bytes: 42,558 Cardinality: 123
                    15 MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN Cost: 15 Bytes: 8,910 Cardinality: 27
                         12 FILTER
                              11 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 9 Bytes: 316 Cardinality: 1
                                   8 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 8 Bytes: 290 Cardinality: 1
                                        5 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 6 Bytes: 256 Cardinality: 1
                                             2 TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_INCREMENTOR Cost: 4 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1 Partition #: 9 Partition access computed by row location
                                                  1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_INC_IDX_01 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 1
                                             4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS Cost: 2 Bytes: 228 Cardinality: 1
                                                  3 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_KEY Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
                                        7 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS Cost: 2 Bytes: 34 Cardinality: 1
                                             6 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_KEY Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
                                   10 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_COUNTERPARTIES Cost: 1 Bytes: 26 Cardinality: 1
                                        9 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.PK_CPTY Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
                         14 BUFFER SORT Cost: 14 Bytes: 448 Cardinality: 32
                              13 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE GDP.GDP_CITIES Cost: 6 Bytes: 448 Cardinality: 32
                    16 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE GDP.GDP_AREAS Cost: 6 Bytes: 2,304 Cardinality: 144
               19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_PORTFOLIOS Cost: 1 Bytes: 33 Cardinality: 1
                    18 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.PORTFOLIOS_KEY Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
Explain Plan for Slow Query
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 11,526,226 Bytes: 119,281,912 Cardinality: 314,728
     21 SORT ORDER BY Cost: 11,526,226 Bytes: 119,281,912 Cardinality: 314,728
          20 HASH JOIN Cost: 11,510,350 Bytes: 119,281,912 Cardinality: 314,728
               2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_PORTFOLIOS Cost: 1,741 Bytes: 177,540 Cardinality: 5,380
                    1 INDEX FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.PORTFOLIOS_KEY Cost: 14 Cardinality: 5,380
               19 HASH JOIN Cost: 11,507,479 Bytes: 87,932,495,360 Cardinality: 254,140,160
                    3 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE GDP.GDP_AREAS Cost: 6 Bytes: 2,304 Cardinality: 144
                    18 MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN Cost: 11,506,343 Bytes: 18,602,733,930 Cardinality: 56,371,921
                         15 FILTER
                              14 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER Cost: 3,930,405 Bytes: 556,672,868 Cardinality: 1,761,623
                                   5 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_COUNTERPARTIES Cost: 6,763 Bytes: 892,580 Cardinality: 34,330
                                        4 INDEX FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.PK_CPTY Cost: 63 Cardinality: 34,330
                                   13 HASH JOIN OUTER Cost: 3,923,634 Bytes: 510,870,670 Cardinality: 1,761,623
                                        10 HASH JOIN Cost: 2,096,894 Bytes: 450,975,488 Cardinality: 1,761,623
                                             7 TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_INCREMENTOR Cost: 2,763 Bytes: 52,083,248 Cardinality: 1,860,116 Partition #: 14 Partition access computed by row location
                                                  6 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_INC_IDX_01 Cost: 480 Cardinality: 334,821
                                             9 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS Cost: 1,734,205 Bytes: 8,320,076,820 Cardinality: 36,491,565
                                                  8 INDEX FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_KEY Cost: 104,335 Cardinality: 39,200,838
                                        12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS Cost: 1,733,836 Bytes: 1,331,145,696 Cardinality: 39,151,344
                                             11 INDEX FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_KEY Cost: 104,335 Cardinality: 39,200,838
                         17 BUFFER SORT Cost: 11,499,580 Bytes: 448 Cardinality: 32
                              16 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE GDP.GDP_CITIES Cost: 4 Bytes: 448 Cardinality: 32
How can I avoid that.
Thanks

Hello
Could you reformat your execution plans because they aren't particularly readable. The forums allow you to preserve the formatting of code or output by putting the symbol {noformat}{noformat} before and after the section of text you want to preserve formatting for.
If you write
{noformat}select * from v$version
{noformat}
it will be displayed asselect * from v$version
So can you run this above statement and post the output here so we know the full oracle version you are working with? And finally, it would be really helpful to see the query you are running. When you say it runs fine in Toad, is that when you replace the bind variables with the values or are you also using bind variables in Toad?
Cheers
David

ORA-01006 Using Bind Variables In A Dynamic SQL Contains Query

I have the following dynamic SQL query :-
declare
TYPE typ_sql IS REF CURSOR;
ltyp_sql typ_sql;
lv_sql VARCHAR2(100);
begin
lv_sql := 'SELECT arx_id FROM arx WHERE CONTAINS ';
lv_sql := lv_sql || (arx_full,''(:b1) WITHIN ui'') > 0';
open ltyp_sql FOR v_sql USING ln_id;
fetch ......
close ......
end;
When the code tries to open the cursor it gives the above error. I presume it is the way Oracle is expanding the bind variable but I cannot find anything in the docs to say why this is happening or whether you can do this or not using bind variables ( CONTAINS query ). Any help would be appreciated, thanks,
Stuart.

lv_sql || '(arx_full, :b1 || '' within ui'') > 0';

Help in query using regular expression

HI,
I need a help to get the below output using regular expression query. Please help me.
SELECT REGEXP_SUBSTR ('PWRPKG(P/W+P/L+CC)', '[^+]+', 1, lvl) val, lvl
FROM DUAL,(SELECT LEVEL lvl FROM DUAL
CONNECT BY LEVEL <=(SELECT MAX ( LENGTH ('PWRPKG(P/W+P/L+CC)') - LENGTH (REPLACE ('PWRPKG(P/W+P/L+CC)','+',NULL))+ 1) FROM DUAL));
I need the output as
correct result:
==============
val lvl
P/W 1
P/L 2
CC 3
But i tried the above it is not coming the above result. Please help me where i did a mistake.
Thanks in advance

Frank gave you a solution in your other thread. You could simplify it if you are on 11g:
SQL> select * from table_x
2 /
TXT
TECHPKG(INTELLI CC+FRT SONAR)
PWRPKG(P/W+P/L+CC)
select txt,
        regexp_substr(
                      txt,
                      '(.*\()*([^+)]+)',
                      1,
                      column_value,
                      null,
                      2
                     ) element,
        column_value element_number
from table_x,
        table(
              cast(
                   multiset(
                            select level
                              from dual
                              connect by level <= regexp_count(txt,'\+') + 1
                   as sys.OdciNumberList
order by rowid,
           column_value
TXT                                      ELEMENT    ELEMENT_NUMBER
TECHPKG(INTELLI CC+FRT SONAR)            INTELLI CC              1
TECHPKG(INTELLI CC+FRT SONAR)            FRT SONAR               2
PWRPKG(P/W+P/L+CC)                       P/W                     1
PWRPKG(P/W+P/L+CC)                       P/L                     2
PWRPKG(P/W+P/L+CC)                       CC                      3
SQL> SY.

Query with bind variable, how can use it in managed bean ?

Hi
I create query with bind variable (BindControlTextValue), this query return description of value that i set in BindControlTextValue variable, how can i use this query in managed bean? I need to set this value in String parameter in managed bean.
Thanks

Put the query in a VO and execute it the usual way.
If you need to, you can write a parameterized method in VOImpl that executes the VO query with the parameter and then call that method from the UI (as a methodAction binding) either through the managed bean or via a direct button click on the page.

Using a query with bind variable with columns defined as raw

Hi,
We are on Oracle 10.2.0.4 on Solaris 8. I have a table that has 2 columns defined as raw(18). I have a query from the front end that queries these two raw columns and it uses bind vairables. The query has a performance issue that I need to reproduce but my difficulty is that how to test the query in sqlplus using bind variables (the syntax for bind vairables fails for columns with raw datatype).
SQL> DESC TEST
Name                                      Null?    Type
ID1                                                RAW(18)
ID2                                                RAW(18)
SQL> variable b1 RAW(18);
Usage: VAR[IABLE] [ <variable> [ NUMBER | CHAR | CHAR (n [CHAR|BYTE]) |
                    VARCHAR2 (n [CHAR|BYTE]) | NCHAR | NCHAR (n) |
                    NVARCHAR2 (n) | CLOB | NCLOB | REFCURSOR |
                    BINARY_FLOAT | BINARY_DOUBLE ] ]
The above is the error I get - i cant declare a variable as raw.
SQL> variable b2 RAW(18);
Usage: VAR[IABLE] [ <variable> [ NUMBER | CHAR | CHAR (n [CHAR|BYTE]) |
                    VARCHAR2 (n [CHAR|BYTE]) | NCHAR | NCHAR (n) |
                    NVARCHAR2 (n) | CLOB | NCLOB | REFCURSOR |
                    BINARY_FLOAT | BINARY_DOUBLE ] ]
SQL> variable b3 RAW(18);
Usage: VAR[IABLE] [ <variable> [ NUMBER | CHAR | CHAR (n [CHAR|BYTE]) |
                    VARCHAR2 (n [CHAR|BYTE]) | NCHAR | NCHAR (n) |
                    NVARCHAR2 (n) | CLOB | NCLOB | REFCURSOR |
                    BINARY_FLOAT | BINARY_DOUBLE ] ]
--now the actual query below
SQL> SELECT * FROM TEST WHERE ID1=:B1 AND ID2 BETWEEN :B2 AND :B3;
SP2-0552: Bind variable "B3" not declared.
(this fails due to the errors earlier)Also this is a third party app schema so that we don't have the option of modifying the data type of the columns.
Thanks,
Edited by: orausern on May 10, 2011 11:30 AM

Try anonymous PL/SQL block:
declare
b1 RAW(18);
b2 RAW(18);
b3 RAW(18);
begin
b1:=..;
b2:=..;
b3:=..;
SELECT col1, col2, ..
INTO ...
FROM TEST
WHERE ID1=:B1
AND ID2 BETWEEN :B2 AND :B3;
end;
/

Please help to re-write this query using exists or with

Hi please help to re-write this query using exists or with, i need to write same code for 45 day , 90 days and so on but sub query condition is same for all
SELECT SUM (DECODE (t_one_mon_c_paid_us, 0, 0, 1)) t_two_y_m_mul_ca_
FROM (SELECT SUM (one_mon_c_paid_us) t_one_mon_c_paid_us
FROM (
SELECT a.individual_id individual_id,
CASE
WHEN NVL
(b.ship_dt,
TO_DATE ('05-MAY-1955')
) >= SYSDATE - 45
AND a.country_cd = 'US'
AND b.individual_id in (
SELECT UNIQUE c.individual_id
FROM order c
WHERE c.prod_cd = 'A'
AND NVL (c.last_payment_dt,
TO_DATE ('05-MAY-1955')
) >= SYSDATE - 745)
THEN 1
ELSE 0
END AS one_mon_c_paid_us
FROM items b, addr a, product d
WHERE b.prod_id = d.prod_id
AND d.affinity_1_cd = 'ADH'
AND b.individual_id = a.individual_id)
GROUP BY individual_id)
Edited by: user4522368 on Aug 23, 2010 9:11 AM

Please try and place \ before and after you code \Could you not remove the inline column select with the following?
SELECT a.individual_id individual_id
     ,CASE
        when b.Ship_dt is null then
          3
        WHEN b.ship_dt >= SYSDATE - 90
          3
        WHEN b.ship_dt >= SYSDATE - 45
          2
        WHEN b.ship_dt >= SYSDATE - 30
          1
      END AS one_mon_c_paid_us
FROM items           b
     ,addr            a
     ,product         d
     ,order           o
WHERE b.prod_id       = d.prod_id
AND   d.affinity_1_cd = 'ADH'
AND   b.individual_id = a.individual_id
AND   b.Individual_ID = o.Individual_ID
and   o.Prod_CD       = 'A'
and   NVL (o.last_payment_dt,TO_DATE ('05-MAY-1955') ) >= SYSDATE - 745
and   a.Country_CD    = 'US'

BUG ? : ADF creating extra VO instance using bind variables in a LOV query

ADF 11.1.1.1.0
After "playing around" with bind variables Setting bind variables in view objects for LOV I've come across something strange that I've reproduce using the HR schema and tables Employees and Departments. Its a bit long but here goes :
Using the HR schema tables departments and employeesI'm trying to create a LOV (selectOneChoice) for the
employee department, the LOV having a bind variable that limits the values returned in this case returning only DepartmentId = 50
I've create a VO lovDepartment (not based on an EO) with the following query :
SELECT Departments.DEPARTMENT_ID,
       Departments.DEPARTMENT_NAME,
       Departments.MANAGER_ID,
       Departments.LOCATION_ID
FROM DEPARTMENTS Departments
where DEPARTMENT_ID = :pDeptIdA LOV has been defined on the DepartmentId attribute of the EmployeesView.
The lovDepartmentImpl overrides the executeQueryForCollection to set the bind variable value.
    @Override
    protected void executeQueryForCollection(Object object, Object[] object2,
                                             int i) {
        setNamedWhereClauseParam("pDeptId", "50");
        super.executeQueryForCollection(object, object2, i);
    }When using an ADF form to create a new employee the DepartmentId lov is empty.
Enabling SQL tracing shows the following :
[370] _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0 ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, pDeptId, null)
[371] _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0 ViewRowSetImpl.execute caused params to be "un"changed
[372] Column count: 4
[373] _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0 ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, pDeptId, null)
[374] _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1 ViewRowSetImpl.setNamedWhereClauseParam(pDeptId, 50)
[375] ViewObject: _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1 Created new QUERY statement
[376] _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1>#q computed SQLStmtBufLen: 235, actual=195, storing=225
[377] SELECT Departments.DEPARTMENT_ID,
       Departments.DEPARTMENT_NAME,
       Departments.MANAGER_ID,
       Departments.LOCATION_ID
FROM DEPARTMENTS Departments
where DEPARTMENT_ID = :pDeptId
[378] Bind params for ViewObject: _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1
[379] For RowSet : _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0
[380] Binding null of type 12 for "pDeptId"
[381] No Resource Bundle found but null value id:LOV_DepartmentId_LOVUIHints_NullValueId is defined in an ListBinding Definition.It would seem that 2 lovDepartment instances are used one at line 370 LOCALVIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0
and one at line 374 LOCALVIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1
The one at line 374 LOCALVIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1 gets the variable bound at line 374
however LOCALVIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0 gets a null value and would explain the empty LOV
Can anybody explain what is happening here ? (and how to use bind variables in LOV queries)
Regards
Paul
(bump)
Edited by: Paul (MITsa) on Jul 14, 2009 10:46 AM
I've now tried all types of LOV from ChoiceList to Radio groupe by testing the application module - none of them work.....
Edited by: Paul (MITsa) on 14-Jul-2009 22:52

when you rinvoke executeQueryForCollection the bind variables are allready set and they exist in Object[] object2 method parameters.
in order to change them you need something like:
private void changeGenericBindVariable(Object[] params, String paramName, Object paramValue) {
for (int i = 0; i < params.length; i++) {
if (paramName.equals(((Object[])params)[0].toString()))
((Object[])params[i])[1] = paramValue;
* executeQueryForCollection - overridden for custom java data source support.
protected void executeQueryForCollection(Object qc, Object[] params,
int noUserParams) {
changeGenericBindVariable(params, "pDeptId", "50")
super.executeQueryForCollection(object, object2, i);
But its better to set bind variables before you executeQueryForCollection. like when you invoke LOV.
For cascading LOVs and the problems i have check:
[http://adfbugs.blogspot.com/2009/07/jdeveloper-11-r1-cascading-lov-bugs.html]

Using Bind Variables in Parameter Form's Query

I want to use bind variables in the query of Parameter form. But
it does not allows. What is the other way out. The structure of
my Parameter form is as under:
State:
Customer:
Now I want that I want to list only those customer in the
Customer LOV which belongs to the selected state.
Thanks.
Muhammad Nadeem

Can we just link to an oracle form using a url still as we can with reports? I've built a report that requires the user to select from a dynamic list as well, and I know how to do this through forms, but can I simply call the form from a webpage?

Need SQL query using View - Please help

Hi,
I have similar requirement like below.
I have two tables DEPT and EMP and some departments may not have employees. I have created below view, which displays all DEPT records, even though there are no emplyees.
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW dept_emp_vw AS
SELECT deptno, empid, 0 AS selected
FROM dept d, emp e
WHERE d.deptno = e.deptnno (+);
Ex.
DEPTNO         EMPID        SELECTED
10 101 0
10 102 0
20 103 0
30 103 0
40 104 0
50 <null> 0
Application will pass "empid" to the view (for ex. empid = 103) and I want result like below.
Ex.
DEPTNO         EMPID        SELECTED
10 101 0
10 102 0
20 103 1
30 103 1
40 104 0
50 <null> 0
Can you please let me know the query using "dept_emp_vw" view. We have Oracle 11g Release 2.
Thanks a lot for the help.

Not possible using normal SQL - as SQL is not a procedure language and does not support variable declaration and use (e.g. passing empid as a variable and using it both as a predicate and as a condition in the SQL projection).
That said - SQL can be "+parameterised+". An approach that is ugly and contrary to the basic design and use of SQL. But it can support the (very weird) view definition of yours.
E.g.
SQL> create or replace procedure SetVariable( name varchar2, value varchar2 ) is
2 begin
3          DBMS_SESSION.set_context( 'MyVariables', name, value );
4 end;
5 /
Procedure created.
SQL>
SQL>
SQL> create or replace context MyVariables using SetVariable;
Context created.
SQL>
SQL> create or replace view my_funky_weird_view as
2 select
3          e.empno,
4          e.ename,
5          e.job,
6          case e.empno
7                  when to_number(sys_context( 'MyVariables', 'empid' )) then
8                          0
9                  else
10                          1
11          end     as "SELECTED"
12 from       emp e
13 /
View created.
SQL>
SQL> exec SetVariable( 'empid', 7499 )
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> select * from session_context where namespace = 'MYVARIABLES';
NAMESPACE            ATTRIBUTE            VALUE
MYVARIABLES          EMPID                7499
SQL>
SQL> select * from my_funky_weird_view order by selected;
     EMPNO ENAME      JOB               SELECTED
      7499 ALLEN      SALESMAN                 0
      7521 WARD       SALESMAN                 1
      7566 JONES      MANAGER                  1
      7654 MARTIN     SALESMAN                 1
      7698 BLAKE      MANAGER                  1
      7934 MILLER     CLERK                    1
      7788 SCOTT      ANALYST                  1
      7839 KING       PRESIDENT                1
      7844 TURNER     SALESMAN                 1
      7876 ADAMS      CLERK                    1
      7900 JAMES      CLERK                    1
      7902 FORD       ANALYST                  1
      7369 SMITH      CLERK                    1
      7782 CLARK      MANAGER                  1
14 rows selected.
SQL>But I will N\OT recommend doing it this way. It is not natural SQL as PL/SQL is needed to "+inject+" name-value pairs into the context for the SQL view to use. It is ugly. It is not standard. It cannot scale. It is complex to use. Etc.
Yes, there are instances when this approach is exactly what one needs - when for example dealing with a trusted context and using the contents for implementing a security layer. But in the above case - I would rather want to see the actual business requirement first, as I think you're barking up the wrong tree with the view solution you have imagined.

Pass username and password ADFS without using query string, Please help.

pass username and password ADFS without using query string, Please help.
I used query string , but it is unsecured to pass credentials over url, with simple tool like httpwatch , anyone can easily get the password and decrypt it.

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you had an issue about the ADFS.
As this issue is related to ADFS, I recommend you post your issue to the forum for ADFS.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/home?forum=Geneva
The reason why we recommend posting appropriately is you will get the most qualified pool of respondents, and other partners who read the forums regularly can either share their knowledge or learn from your interaction with us.
Thank you for your understanding and support.
Thanks,
Jason
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Jason Guo
TechNet Community Support

Query using binding help?!?!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for