Query:without using union
hai every one,
ihave atable like this:
table1
id emp1 emp2 emp3
1 100 200 300
2 90 295 977
3 150 299 500
and i need the result like this:
100
90
150
200
295
299
300
977
500
the result is just union of emp1,emp2 and emp3
i.e, this type of result we can produce with this:
select emp1 from table1 union select emp2 from table1 union select emp3 from table1
but i need a query having the same result as above without using the union statement
thanks in advance...
Edited by: jp_valapad on Sep 12, 2008 2:38 AM
Edited by: jp_valapad on Sep 12, 2008 2:39 AM
Karthick_Arp wrote:
...but may not be the best way.Well, on my example, using your method:
with my_tab as (select 1 id, 1 col1, 2 col2 from dual union all
select 2 id, 3 col1, 4 col2 from dual union all
select 3 id, 5 col1, 6 col2 from dual)
select mt.id,
decode(dt.id, 1, mt.col1, 2, mt.col2) col_val,
dt.id dummy_id
from my_tab mt,
(select level id
from dual
connect by level <= (select max(id) from my_tab)) dt
order by dt.id, mt.id
ID COL_VAL DUMMY_ID
1 1 1
2 3 1
3 5 1
1 2 2
2 4 2
3 6 2
1 3
2 3
3 3So, clearly not the best way!
Your dummy table needs to contain the same number of rows as the number of columns that are to be unpivoted - in my example 2, in the OP's example 3. It's just a fluke that yours worked, as the OP's test data had 3 id's!
Similar Messages
-
Select extra row without using UNION ALL in pl/sql
Hi,
Can anyone tell me how to select extra row without using UNION or UNION ALL in pl/sql. Actually I want to have my o/p of query as partitioned by designation and ordered by salary and than one extra row which will contain the highest salary in a particular salary. My table has first_name,emp_id,designation and salary column. And I wnt the o/p as.
Mohinish,12212,SI,46000
Ram,11212,SSI,47000
Shyam,12133,SI,48000
Rick,9898,SI,46000
Rocky,12312,SSI,56000
Sariq,23948,SI,43000
Suman,12789,HR,49000
Sampy,12780,SI,46000
Parna,11111,HR,50000
Now the o/p should be.
Mohinish,12212,SI,46000
Rick,9898,SI,46000
Sariq,23948,SI,43000
Shyam,12133,SI,48000
Shyam,12133,SI,48000
Ram,11212,SSI,47000
Rocky,12312,SSI,56000
Rocky,12312,SSI,56000
Suman,12789,HR,49000
Parna,11111,HR,50000
Parna,11111,HR,50000
Thanks in AdvanceYou don't have to do a UNION or UNION ALL in PL/SQL but you would need to in SQL to get the desired output:
with data_recs
as (select 'Mohinish' first_name,12212 emp_id,'SI' designation,46000 salary from dual union
select 'Ram',11212,'SSI',47000 from dual union
select 'Shyam',12133,'SI',48000 from dual union
select 'Rick',9898,'SI',46000 from dual union
select 'Rocky',12312,'SSI',56000 from dual union
select 'Sariq',23948,'SI',43000 from dual union
select 'Suman',12789,'HR',49000 from dual union
select 'Sampy',12780,'SI',46000 from dual union
select 'Parna',11111,'HR',50000 from dual)
select first_name, emp_id, designation, salary from data_recs union all
select s.first_name, s.emp_id, s.designation, s.salary
from (select first_name,
emp_id,
designation,
salary,
row_number() over (partition by designation order by salary desc) high_salary
from data_recs
order by designation, salary) s
where s.high_salary = 1
order by designation, salary;
FIRST_NAME EMP_ID DESIGNATION SALARY
Suman 12789 HR 49000
Parna 11111 HR 50000
Parna 11111 HR 50000
Sariq 23948 SI 43000
Rick 9898 SI 46000
Mohinish 12212 SI 46000
Sampy 12780 SI 46000
Shyam 12133 SI 48000
Shyam 12133 SI 48000
Ram 11212 SSI 47000
Rocky 12312 SSI 56000
Rocky 12312 SSI 56000 -
How to write a SQL Query without using group by clause
Hi,
Can anyone help me to find out if there is a approach to build a SQL Query without using group by clause.
Please site an example if is it so,
RegardsI hope this example could illuminate danepc on is problem.
CREATE or replace TYPE MY_ARRAY AS TABLE OF INTEGER
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION GET_ARR return my_array
as
arr my_array;
begin
arr := my_array();
for i in 1..10 loop
arr.extend;
arr(i) := i mod 7;
end loop;
return arr;
end;
select column_value
from table(get_arr)
order by column_value;
select column_value,count(*) occurences
from table(get_arr)
group by column_value
order by column_value;And the output should be something like this:
SQL> CREATE or replace TYPE MY_ARRAY AS TABLE OF INTEGER
2 /
Tipo creato.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION GET_ARR return my_array
2 as
3 arr my_array;
4 begin
5 arr := my_array();
6 for i in 1..10 loop
7 arr.extend;
8 arr(i) := i mod 7;
9 end loop;
10 return arr;
11 end;
12 /
Funzione creata.
SQL>
SQL>
SQL> select column_value
2 from table(get_arr)
3 order by column_value;
COLUMN_VALUE
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
5
6
Selezionate 10 righe.
SQL>
SQL> select column_value,count(*) occurences
2 from table(get_arr)
3 group by column_value
4 order by column_value;
COLUMN_VALUE OCCURENCES
0 1
1 2
2 2
3 2
4 1
5 1
6 1
Selezionate 7 righe.
SQL> Bye Alessandro -
Needs help to retrive the last row in a select query without using rownum
Hi ,
i need to retrive the last row from the select sub query without using rownum.
is there any other way to retrive the last row other than the below query.
is that the ROWNUM=1 will always retrive the 1 row of the select query ?
select from*
*(select ename from employee where dept_id=5 order by desc) where rownum=1;*
Please advise.
thanks for your help advance,
regards,
Senthur957595 wrote:
Actually my problem is ithat while selecting the parents hiearchy of the child data using
CONNECT BY PRIOIR query
I need the immediate parent of my child data.
For example my connect BY query returns
AAA --- ROOT
BBB --PARENT -2
CCC --PARENT-1
DDD IS my input child to the connect by query
Immediate parent of my child data "DDD" ---> CCC(parent -1)
i want the data "CCC" from the select query,for that i am taking the last row of the query with rownum.
I got to hear that using ROWNUM to retrive the data will leads to some problem.It is a like a magic number.I am not sure what the problem will be.
So confusing with using this rownum in my query.
Please advice!!!It's not quite clear what you're wanting, but perhaps this may help?
you can select the PRIOR values to get the parent details if you want...
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 select empno, lpad(' ',(level-1)*2,' ')||ename as ename, prior empno as mgr
2 from emp
3 connect by mgr = prior empno
4* start with mgr is null
SQL> /
EMPNO ENAME MGR
7839 KING
7566 JONES 7839
7788 SCOTT 7566
7876 ADAMS 7788
7902 FORD 7566
7369 SMITH 7902
7698 BLAKE 7839
7499 ALLEN 7698
7521 WARD 7698
7654 MARTIN 7698
7844 TURNER 7698
7900 JAMES 7698
7782 CLARK 7839
7934 MILLER 7782
14 rows selected.(ok, not the best of examples as the mgr is already known for a row, but it demonstrates you can select prior data) -
Hello every one, can I rewrite the following query without using the 'ROW_NUMBER() OVER ' part.
The query is supposed to pull out the records whose CODE is not NULL and has most
recent date for UPDATE_DATE . The reason I wanted to do this is, When I embed this query
in between many other queries along with JOINs, My oracle server is unable to execute. So, I thought
its better to supplant 'ROW_NUMBER() OVER ' logic with something else and try it. .
SELECT a.* FROM
(SELECT b.*, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY b.PIDM
ORDER BY b.UPDATE_DATE DESC) AS Rno
FROM
SELECT *
FROM SHYNCRO WHERE CODE IS NOT NULL
)b
)a
WHERE a.Rno = 1Hi,
You didn't write over 150 lines of code and then start testing it, did you?
Don't.
Take baby steps. Write as little as pssiblem test that. Debug and test again until you have something that does exactly what you want it to do.
When you have somehting that works perfectly, take one baby step. Add a tiny amount of code, maybe 1 or 2 lines more, and test again.
When you do get an error, or wrong results, you'll have a much better idea of where the problem is. also, you won't be building code on a flimsy foundation.
If you need help, post the last working version and the new version with the error. Explain what you're trying to do in the new version.
The error message indicates line 133. It looks like line 133 of your code is blank. Does your front end allow completely blank lines in the middle of a query? SQL*Plus doesn't by default; you have to say
SET SQLBLANKLINES ONto have a completely blank line in SQL*Plus. (However, lines containing nothing but at commnet are always allowed.)
You may have noticed that this site normally doesn't display multiple spaces in a row.
Whenever you post formatted text (such as indented code) on this site, type these 6 characters:
\(small letters only, inside curly brackets) before and after each section of formatted text, to preserve spacing.
The 4 people who posted small code fragments for you to read all did this. It would be so much easier for people to read your humongeous query if it were formatted. -
How can i fetch records from 3 tables in a single query without using join
Hi.
Can any body please tell me <b>How can i fetch records from 3 tables with a single query without using joins</b>
Thanx
prabhuduttaHi Prabgudutta,
We can fetch the data by using the views concept.
Go throuth this info we can know the how to create view and same like database table only we can fetch the data.
Views conatin the data at runtime only.
Four different view types are supported. These differ in the
way in which the view is implemented and in the methods
permitted for accessing the view data.
Database views are implemented with an equivalent view on
the database.
Projection views are used to hide fields of a table (only
projection).
Help views can be used as selection method in search helps.
Maintenance views permit you to maintain the data
distributed
on several tables for one application object at one time.
step by step creation of Maintenance view:
With the help of the table maintenance generator, you are able to maintain the ENTRIES of the table in SM30 transaction.
It can be set in transaction SE11 - Tools - Table maintenance generator.
Table maintanance Generator is used to manually input values using transaction sm30
follow below steps
1) go to se11 check table maintanance check box under attributes tab
2) utilities-table maintanance Generator-> create function group and assign it under
function group input box. Also assign authorization group default &NC& .
3) select standard recording routine radio in table table mainitainence generator to move table
contents to quality and production by assigning it to request.
4) select maintaience type as single step.
5) maintainence screen as system generated numbers this dialog box appears when you click on create button
6) save and activate table
One step, two step in Table Maintenance Generator
Single step: Only overview screen is created i.e. the Table Maintenance Program will have only one screen where you can add, delete or edit records.
Two step: Two screens namely the overview screen and Single screen are created. The user can see the key fields in the first screen and can further go on to edit further details.
SM30 is used for table maintenance(addition or deletion of records),
For all the tables in SE11 for which Table maintenance is selected , they can be maintained in SM30
Sm30 is used to maintain the table ,i.e to delete ,insert or modify the field values and all..
It creates the maintenance screen for u for the aprticular table as the maintenance is not allowed for the table..
In the SE11 delivery and maintenance tab, keep the maintenance allowed..
Then come to the SM30 and then enter the table name and press maintain..,
Give the authorization group if necessary and give the function group and then select maintenance type as one step and give the screen numbers as system specified..
Then create,,,
Then u will able to see the maintenance view for the table in which u can able to insert and delete the table values...
We use SM30 transaction for entering values into any DB table.
First we create a table in SE11 and create the table maintenance generator for that Table using (utilities-> table maintenance generator) and create it.
Then it will create a View.
After that from SM30, enter the table name and Maintain, create new entries, change the existing entries for that table.
Hope this resolves your query.
Reward all the helpful answers.
Rgds,
P.Naganjana Reddy -
Tuning query without using hint
Hi,
i want to change the plan of a query without using hint.
Also i want to use the plan that hint generate in my original query.
My db is a 11g.
How can i do this?
tnxYou can use SQL Plan Manager. You might find this interesting:
http://blogs.oracle.com/optimizer/entry/what_should_i_do_with_old_hints_in_my_workload
The link above basically suggests these steps:
1. Run the query with the hints, then
2. Take the plan from #1 and associate its SQL plan baseline with the query with no hints
3. Remove the hints for that query in the code and start capturing and evolving plans for the un-hinted query -
I want single update query without use the function.
I want to update sells_table selling_code field with max date product_code from product table.
In product table there is multiple product_code date wise.
I have been done it with below quey with the use of function but can we do it in only one update query
without use the function.
UPDATE sells_table
SET selling_code = MAXDATEPRODUCT(ctd_vpk_product_code)
WHERE NVL(update_product_flag,0) = 0 ;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION HVL.maxdateproduct (p_product IN VARCHAR2) RETURN NUMBER
IS
max_date_product VARCHAR2 (100);
BEGIN
BEGIN
SELECT NVL (TRIM (product_code), 0)
INTO max_date_product
FROM (SELECT product_code, xref_end_dt
FROM product
WHERE TO_NUMBER (p_product) = pr.item_id
ORDER BY xref_end_dt DESC)
WHERE ROWNUM = 1; -- It will return only one row - max date product code
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS
THEN
RETURN 0;
END;
RETURN max_date_product;
END maxdateproduct;
Thanks in Advance.Hi,
Something like this.
update setlls_table st
set selling_code =(select nvl(trim(product_code)) from
(select product_code
, rank() over (partition by item_id order by xref_end_dt DESC) rn
from product
) pr
where rn =1
and pr.item_id = st.ctd_vpk_product_code
) where NVL(update_product_flag,0) = 0 ;As such not tested due to lack of input sample.
Regards
Anurag Tibrewal. -
Can u write the following query without using group by clause
select sp.sid, p.pid, p.name from product p, supp_prod sp
where sp.pid= p.pid and
sp.sid = ( select sid from supp_prod group by sid
having count(*) =(select count(*) from product));
thru this, we retrieving all the products delivered by the supplier.
Can you write the following query without using the group by clauseselect sp.sid, p.pid, p.name
from product p, supp_prod sp
where sp.pid= p.pid the above query will still retrieve all the products supplied by the supplier. sub-query is not necessary.
maybe if you can post some sample data and output will help us understand what you want to achieve. -
How to design a query without using Net Weaver Query Designer
Does anyone know if any alternative way to <b>design an query without using Net weaver GUI</b>? in order to reduce the time consuming, I am wondering if there have any method which can define/modify a stack of cells, characteristics and structures without work through the GUI.
Deeply thank for any of your advices.Can you give an example?
Just from what you write, I would assume that you talk about something like a mass-property-changer. As far as I know the BEx this is not really possible, but what I do normally is building one query and then either using query-views (saving more or less the navigation state) or by copying and changing the properties of the few characteristics and key figures.
But without a specific example it's difficult to exactly understand what you exactly need.
Mario -
Is it possible to group multiple columns individually without using union?
Hi, if I have a table with a numebr of columns I want to group eg gender, nationality, age and I want to produce a summary such like:
Group Count
Male 10
Female 23
British 19
Irish 14
18 10
etc.
Or even better:
Group Count
Gender-Male 10
Gender-Female 23
Nationaility-British 19
Nationality-Irish 14
Age-18 10
Is this possible without using loads of unions? I just want to do this in the best, most efficient way as the table involved has >100 million rows.
Many thanks
Jen :)May be this
--Test data
with t
as
select 'M' gender, 'INDIAN' nationality, 25 age from dual union all
select 'M' gender, 'INDIAN' nationality, 25 age from dual union all
select 'M' gender, 'INDIAN' nationality, 30 age from dual union all
select 'M' gender, 'IRISH' nationality, 30 age from dual union all
select 'M' gender, 'IRISH' nationality, 40 age from dual union all
select 'F' gender, 'IRISH' nationality, 40 age from dual union all
select 'F' gender, 'BRITISH' nationality, 50 age from dual union all
select 'F' gender, 'BRITISH' nationality, 50 age from dual union all
select 'F' gender, 'BRITISH' nationality, 45 age from dual union all
select 'F' gender, 'BRITISH' nationality, 45 age from dual
--Test Data Ends
-- Main Query
select decode(no, 1, 'Gender-', 2, 'Nationality-', 3, 'Age-') || decode(no, 1, gender, 2, nationality, 3, to_char(age)) val,
count(*) cnt
from t
cross join (select level no from dual connect by level <= 3)
group by no, decode(no, 1, gender, 2, nationality, 3, to_char(age))
order by no;
VAL CNT
Gender-F 5
Gender-M 5
Nationality-BRITISH 4
Nationality-INDIAN 3
Nationality-IRISH 3
Age-25 2
Age-30 2
Age-40 2
Age-45 2
Age-50 2
10 rows selected -
SQL Query without using Pivot...
Hi Guys,
Need help with a query... I think pivot table is the way to go but don't wanna to use it as it is not supported in Oracle 10g.
Sample data set...
Part
Section
A001
AC
A001
AY
A001
AN
A001
AX
A015
AC
A015
AR
A007
AC
A008
AN
A008
AX
A008
AE
A008
AT
A008
AY
Required output... (Please note that I cannot hard code the Section column as the data is dynamic)
Part
AC
AY
AN
AX
AR
AE
AT
A001
Y
Y
Y
Y
A015
Y
Y
A007
Y
A008
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Can you help me out with this without using pivot tables?
Thanks,
NapsterHi Napster, Try this
select part,
max(decode(section,'AC','Y',NULL)) AC,
max(decode(section,'AY','Y',NULL)) AY,
max(decode(section,'AN','Y',NULL)) AN,
max(decode(section,'AX','Y',NULL)) AX,
max(decode(section,'AC','Y',NULL)) AC,
max(decode(section,'AR','Y',NULL)) AR,
max(decode(section,'AT','Y',NULL)) AT
from sple group by part
SQL> /
Output will be
PART A A A A A A A
A001 Y Y Y Y Y
A007 Y Y
A008 Y Y Y Y
A015 Y Y Y -
Hello!
I need some correction in the following query. I am trying to make a 2 page QPLD so I am joining 2 queries and then printing the report into 2 pages.
SELECT T0.[U_OANumber], T0.[custmrName], T0.[U_Inspection], T0.[U_Cust_PO_Num],
T0.[U_ModelType], T0.[U_Duty], T0.[U_NamePlate],
T0.[U_Indicator_Obs], T0.[U_Fastners], T0.[U_Mounting_Type], T0.[U_Casing_Orientation], T0.[U_Impeller_Dia],
T0.[U_Bearing_Style], T0.[U_Motor_HP_Size], T0.[U_InsulationWedges], T0.[U_Varnish], T0.[U_Paint_Shade],
T0.[U_PlugsSeal], T0.[U_Remarks], T0.[U_Despatch]
FROM OINS T0 WHERE T0.[U_OANumber] = '[%0]' or T0.[customer] = '[%1]' or T0.[manufSN] = '[%2]'
Union all
SELECT T0.[U_ModelType], T0.[U_Size], T0.[U_Discharge], T0.[U_Head], T0.[U_RPM], T0.[U_YOM], T0.[U_HP],
T0.[U_Amps], T0.[U_Insulation_Class], T0.[U_Winding_Connection]
FROM OINS T0 WHERE
T0.[U_OANumber] = '[%0]' or T0.[customer] = '[%1]' or T0.[manufSN] = '[%2]'
Do I have to use the where clause just once since it is identical to both statements?
I get the error stating that all queries using Union, Intersect or Except must have an equal number of expressions. what does this mean?
scorp
Edited by: scorpion 666 on Feb 12, 2009 1:30 PMUnion has to have exact same numbers of fields to combine two results. Your query shows no need of union because your where clauses are identical.
Right syntax would be like this:
SELECT T0.[U_OANumber], T0.[custmrName], T0.[U_Inspection], T0.[U_Cust_PO_Num],
T0.[U_ModelType], T0.[U_Duty], T0.[U_NamePlate],
T0.[U_Indicator_Obs], T0.[U_Fastners], T0.[U_Mounting_Type], T0.[U_Casing_Orientation], T0.[U_Impeller_Dia],
T0.[U_Bearing_Style], T0.[U_Motor_HP_Size], T0.[U_InsulationWedges], T0.[U_Varnish], T0.[U_Paint_Shade],
T0.[U_PlugsSeal], T0.[U_Remarks], T0.[U_Despatch], T0.[U_Size], T0.[U_Discharge], T0.[U_Head], T0.[U_RPM], T0.[U_YOM], T0.[U_HP],
T0.[U_Amps], T0.[U_Insulation_Class], T0.[U_Winding_Connection]
FROM DBO.OINS T0 WHERE T0.[U_OANumber] = '[%0]' or T0.[customer] = '[%1]' or T0.[manufSN] = '[%2]'
Thanks,
Gordon -
How can i construct this query without using CASE statement?
I've a following code. I'm using this script in Hibernet. So, i cannot use CASE there. Because, hibernet doesn't support case in select statement. How can i construct the same thing which will give me the same result without using CASE?
SELECT ofc.FLT_LCL_ORIG_DT
, ofc.CARR_IATA_CD
, ofc.FLT_NBR
, ofc.ORIG_ARPT_CD
, ofc.DEST_ARPT_CD
, sum( ofc.CNCT_PSGR_CNT) AS BOOKED_CNCT_PSGR_CNT
, sum( CASE WHEN o.fsdr_mrkt_cd = 'D' AND d.fsdr_mrkt_cd = 'D' THEN '0'
ELSE to_char(ofc.CNCT_PSGR_CNT,'99') END ) AS BOOKED_INTL_CNCT_PSGR_CNT
, sum(CASE WHEN o.fsdr_mrkt_cd||d.fsdr_mrkt_cd = 'DD'
THEN '0'
ELSE to_char(ofc.CNCT_PSGR_CNT,'99')
END) AS NEW_BCNT
FROM OPS_FLT_CNCT ofc
, STN o
, STN d
WHERE ofc.CNCT_ORIG_ARPT_CD = o.STN_CD
AND ofc.CNCT_DEST_ARPT_CD = d.STN_CD
-- AND TRUNC(ofc.FLT_LCL_ORIG_DT) = trunc(to_date('22-MAY-2007','DD-MON-YYYY'))
AND ofc.CARR_IATA_CD = 'UA'
AND ofc.FLT_NBR = '1218'
AND ofc.ORIG_ARPT_CD = upper('DEN') AND ofc.DEST_ARPT_CD = upper('IAD') GROUP BY ofc.FLT_LCL_ORIG_DT
, ofc.CARR_IATA_CD
, ofc.FLT_NBR
, ofc.ORIG_ARPT_CD
, ofc.DEST_ARPT_CD ;And, the output look like this --
FLT_LCL_O CARR FLT_N ORI DES BOOKED_CNCT_PSGR_CNT BOOKED_INTL_CNCT_PSGR_CNT NEW_BCNT
22-MAY-07 UA 1218 DEN IAD 9 0 0
23-MAY-07 UA 1218 DEN IAD 1 0 0
24-MAY-07 UA 1218 DEN IAD 2 1 1
25-MAY-07 UA 1218 DEN IAD 1 0 0Thnaks in advance for reply.
Regards.
Satyaki De.
#####2 ideas:
1. Inline function to perform the CASE funcionaltity for you
2. Piplelined function to generate the entire dataset
Both will be slower than just using CASE in a query, but we're working around big constraints -
How to get the values in a single row without using union
Hi,
I have a table with the following structure and data
empid address phoneno emailid
1001 xyz
1001 1234234
1001 [email protected]
1002 23434
1002 [email protected]
1003 abcd
1003 [email protected]
1004 [email protected]
I need to have a result in this format.
emp id address phoneno emailid
1001 xyz 1234234 [email protected]
1002 23434 [email protected]
1003 abcd [email protected]
1004 [email protected]
I can do it using union however that gives a performance issues with a large table. So I wish to do using in any other way using lead or something, but with the complexity about the data, I couldn't do it.
Can anyone please help me?
Natarajan
Edited by: Nattu on Dec 3, 2009 3:50 PMSelect employee_id, max(address), max(phone), max(email)
from emp
group by employee_id;Max
Maybe you are looking for
-
Why do I need to declare "defaultButton" ? (In a component form part of view stack)
After doing some research and some help from FlexGuy in another thread, I realize that I need to make sure I have custom components initialized before accessing parts of the component. Just recently I was thrown for a long time when I tried to first
-
Step 1. I open a web page. Step2. I press ctrl+d. Step3. I do not see the window where I choose the folder I wish the bookmark to be saved in. Step4. I clicked the star button on the right corner of location bar. Step5. I see the window now. Step 6.
-
Hi All, I have a report which take 4 hrs time to execute the report If i run this 4 hrs report,the report runs sucessfully when we see in particular report server in application server. But, we wont get any pop up to open report after executing suces
-
Hello While importing communication strcture & infosource ZMM_0CUST_SALES_ATTR we got error 8 saying "There is no DataSource with these attributes Reference to transf
-
Hi folks, Some time ago I had a 16GB 6+ and it crashed with the blue screen, so I returned it. I now have a brand new one that I got from Tmobile ($75 return fee) and although it has mostly worked just fine, I have gotten 2 blue screen crashes. Below