Question about global temp tables

I have global temporary table with ON COMMIT setting ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS. E.g.:
CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE admin_work_area
        (startdate DATE,
         enddate DATE,
         class CHAR(20))
      ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS;On application start procedure inserting data into table, on application end is DELETE statement used to make table empty.
Interestingly if application is started again (in same session!) deleted rows appear again in table before call of insert-procedure. So after call of insert-procedure data will be doubled... :(
So my question is:
Does COMMIT in this constellation making ROLLBACK of deleted rows?
Sounds unlogical to me, but appear to be like that...
Message was edited by:
Faust
Edit: ON COMMIT setting

Are you sure that the rows somehow just appear back
and it's not the application which inserts them
twice.Yes I'm sure, there is only one call of insert-procedure (on application start).
Are you using autonomous transactions for
those inserts by any chance?No.
SID is just an index into session fixed array, so the
only way to get the same SID in an instance is when
the previous session ends.
Each session array slot contains a SERIAL# field
which is zero at instance start and is incremented
every time the slot is reused by next session.
So, as long as your session exists, it is impossible
that someone else gets same SID + SERIAL# combination
in an instance.
Note that the SESSION_ADDR and SESSION_NUM give you
the address and SERIAL# of the session owning a
temporary segment.Original session exist...
Thank you Tanel for your replay!

Similar Messages

  • A better way than a global temp table to reuse a distinct select?

    I get the impression from other threads that global temp tables are frowned upon so I'm wondering if there is a better way to simplify what I need to do. I have some values scattered about a table with a relatively large number of records. I need to distinct them out and delete from 21 other tables where those values also occur. The values have a really low cardinality to the number of rows. Out of 500K+ rows there might be a dozen distinct values.
    I thought that rather than 21 cases of:
    DELETE FROM x1..21 WHERE value IN (SELECT DISTINCT value FROM Y)
    It would be better for performance to populate a global temp table with the distinct first:
    INSERT INTO gtt SELECT DISTINCT value FROM Y
    DELETE FROM x1..21 WHERE value IN (SELECT value FROM GTT)
    People asking questions about GTT's seem to get blasted so is this another case where there's a better way to do this? Should I just have the system bite the bullet on the DISTINCT 21 times? The big table truncates and reloads and needs to do so quickly so I was hoping not to have to index it and meddle with disable/rebuild index but if that's better than a temp table, I'll have to make do.
    As far as I understand WITH ... USING can't be used to delete from multiple tables or can it?

    Almost, but not quite, as efficient as using a temporary table would be to use a PL/SQL collection and FORALL statements and/or referencing the collection in your subsequent statements). Something like
    DECLARE
      TYPE value_nt IS TABLE OF y.value%type;
      l_values value_nt;
    BEGIN
      SELECT distinct value
        BULK COLLECT INTO l_values
        FROM y;
      FORALL i IN 1 .. l_values.count
        DELETE FROM x1
         WHERE value = l_values(i);
      FORALL i IN 1 .. l_values.count
        DELETE FROM x2
         WHERE value = l_values(i);
    END;or
    CREATE TYPE value_nt
      IS TABLE OF varchar2(100); -- Guessing at the type of y.value
    DECLARE
      l_values value_nt;
    BEGIN
      SELECT distinct value
        BULK COLLECT INTO l_values
        FROM y;
      DELETE FROM x1
       WHERE value = (SELECT /*+ cardinality(v 10) */ column_value from table( l_values ) v );
      DELETE FROM x2
       WHERE value = (SELECT /*+ cardinality(v 10) */ column_value from table( l_values ) v );
    END;Justin

  • Global Temp Table or PL/SQL Table

    I am trying to determine if this can be done only using PL/SQL table. If not, will the usage of the global temp table affects the performance.
    Here is the situation,
    I have a data block that is based on a stored procedure. This stored procedure will return table of records from different database tables with join conditions. Some of the fields within the table of records will not have data returned from database tables. They will be the fields displayed on the form and the data will be entered by user.
    For example:
    Records will look like:
    Id          (will be populated by procedure)
    Hist_avg     (will be populated by procedure)
    My_avg     (will be used as field on the form so that user can enter their own avg)
    Cheked     (will be populated by procedure)
    My questions are:
    1.     Is this doable in form using a data block based on PL/SQL table?
    2.     Will users be able to manipulate (update) the data that based on the PL/SQL table in the memory as they wish and invoke the procedure to update the underlying table when clicking on a button (Update Avg)?
    3.     What is the advantage of using PL/SQL table and global temp table from database and form point of views?
    Any info is appreciated.

    Hi there...
    Here is the Reference...
    http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:2939484874961025998::NO::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID,F4950_P8_CRITERIA:604830985638
    Best Regards...
    Muhammad Waseem Haroon

  • Error while creating Global temp table

    Hi,
    I am very new to PL/SQL so please excuse my question. I have the below query . I have to get a count between the source table and various target tables. I am creating a global temp table to store the counts. I am getting the below error for my following query :
    Thanks for the help,
    Petronas
    ----Query----
    set serveroutput on
    Declare
    nm1 varchar2(200);
    nm2 varchar2(200);
    cnt1 number;
    cnt2 number;
    diff number;
    totdiff number;
    Begin
    nm1 := null;
    nm2:= null;
    cnt1:= 0;
    cnt2 := 0;
    diff := 0;
    totdiff := 0;
    create GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE diff ( name1 varchar(200), name2 varchar2(200), diff number);
    select count(*) into cnt1
    from users_staging;
    select count(*) into cnt2
    from PROD.users;
    nm1 := 'users_staging';
    nm2 := 'PROD.users';
    diff := cnt1 - cnt2;
    insert into diff values (nm1,nm2,diff);
    select count(*) into totdiff
    from diff
    where diff> 0 ;
    dbms_output.enable(10000);
    dbms_output.put_line('# of tables where difference is > 0 ' ||totdiff);
    end;
    Encountered the symbol "CREATE" when expecting one of the following:
    begin case declare end exception exit for goto if loop mod
    null pragma raise return select update while with
    <an identifier> <a double-quoted delimited-identifier>
    <a bind variable> << close current delete fetch lock insert
    open rollback savepoint set sql execute commit forall merge
    pipe

    Hi,
    "CREATE GLOBAL TEPORARY TABLE ..." is not a PL/SQL command; it is a SQL command only.
    Create the table, using that statement, before running the PL/SQL block.
    You can issue SQL statements from within PL/SQL using the EXECUTE IMMEDIATE command, but this is rarely a good idea.
    I assume the PL/SQL code is meant to create the table and then populate it.
    You should split those into two separate pieces of code. You'll only want to create the table once, no matter how many times you use it. I assume you'll want to populate it the same way many times. Remember, the "TEMPORARY" in "GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE" refers to the data, not the table. When you end a transaction (or a session, depending on whther you want "ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS" or "ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS"), the data disappears, but the now-empty stays, ready to be populated for the next transaction (or session).
    Edited by: Frank Kulash on Aug 4, 2010 2:25 PM

  • How can I get rid of Global Temp Table

    Hello,
    I've been writing PL/SQL stored proc for creating reports on VB.NET front end. Until now, I've been using session specific global temp table to store intermediate results and at the end I pass the result set to .NET via reference cursor. The reports are created by simply binding the ref cursor result sets to .NET grids. It's been working fine, but I am kind of bothered by the temp tables. I looked on other options, but couldn't really come up with one.
    Can somebody suggest me how I can get rid of those temp tables? Thanks,

    Tubby, that's exactly I was trying to do. I think that table type has to be defined in database, not within PL/SQL. How can I create that table of user defined record type? I tried that, but it doesn't allow me. I think I am missing something. For example,
    create type group_t is record
    (A varchar2,
    B number,
    C number)
    now inside sp, i have something like:
    type my_group is table of group_t index by binary_integer
    now I have sp cursor as
    cursor cur_test IS 'ABC' as A, 1 as B, 5 as C
    now i do something like this. My original queries are longer and much more complicated so please don't suggest you can directly open ref cursor for this query.
    FETCH cur_test BULK COLLECT INTO my_group;
    Then I do all the processing, calculations, totals, sub-totals, and insert into temp table and return via ref cursor.
    My problem is I can't directly fetch into the above table you mentioned. How should I go about in this situation?
    Maybe I should STOP thinking about this approach and just do whatever I've been doing or solve it through pure SQL. However, there are tons of problems with pure SQL approach.

  • Global temp tables for GeoRaster mosaicing

    Hi,
    Although this question involves the GeoRaster capability contained in the Spatial package, it has more to do with global temp tables, so it's in this forum group.
    The mosaicing function requires all the individual images (there is an image in each record) to be in their own table before they can be mosaiced, as there is no way to stipulate only certain images in a table should be used.
    So the best idea I've had so far is to use a global temp table where the images I need can be selected and put in the temp table - then mosaiced. It is important that the temp table contain only the images needed for a given mosaic. However, I will be doing the mosaic operation many times in a given session (possibly even more than 1 mosaic at the same time) and am worried that there will be old or unrelated records in the temp table.
    Does this mean I have to make a new session every time I need to mosaic an image? This doesn't sound very efficient. Can I have just one session but have a "new" temp table each time?
    Thanks,
    MH

    I have very limited experience with Spatial, and have never done anything like a mosaic
    But regarding Global Temp... If you want to make sure the GTT is empty every time, just end your transaction (commit or rollback). This will remove all data from the GTT (if you had it made with ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS - the default)

  • Multiple users accessing the same data in a global temp table

    I have a global temp table (GTT) defined with 'on commit preserve rows'. This table is accessed via a web page using ASP.NET. The application was designed so that every one that accessed the web page could only see their data in the GTT.
    We have just realized that the GTT doesn't appear to be empty as new web users use the application. I believe it has something to do with how ASP is connecting to the database. I only see one entry in the V$SESSION view even when multiple users are using the web page. I believe this single V$SESSION entry is causing only one GTT to be available at a time. Each user is inserting into / selecting out of the same GTT and their results are wrong.
    I'm the back end Oracle developer at this place and I'm having difficulty translating this issue to the front end ASP team. When this web page is accessed, I need it to start a new session, not reuse an existing session. I want to keep the same connection, but just start a new session... Now I'm losing it.. Like I said, I'm the back end guy and all this web/connection/pooling front end stuff is magic to me.
    The GTT isn't going to work unless we get new sessions. How do we do this?
    Thanks!

    DGS wrote:
    I have a global temp table (GTT) defined with 'on commit preserve rows'. This table is accessed via a web page using ASP.NET. The application was designed so that every one that accessed the web page could only see their data in the GTT.
    We have just realized that the GTT doesn't appear to be empty as new web users use the application. I believe it has something to do with how ASP is connecting to the database. I only see one entry in the V$SESSION view even when multiple users are using the web page. I believe this single V$SESSION entry is causing only one GTT to be available at a time. Each user is inserting into / selecting out of the same GTT and their results are wrong.
    I'm the back end Oracle developer at this place and I'm having difficulty translating this issue to the front end ASP team. When this web page is accessed, I need it to start a new session, not reuse an existing session. I want to keep the same connection, but just start a new session... Now I'm losing it.. Like I said, I'm the back end guy and all this web/connection/pooling front end stuff is magic to me.
    The GTT isn't going to work unless we get new sessions. How do we do this?
    Thanks!You may want to try changing your GTT to 'ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS' and have the .Net app use a transaction object.
    We had a similar problem and I found help in the following thread:
    Re: Global temp table problem w/ODP?
    All the best.

  • Inserting data in global temp table?

    Hello experts,
    i have a form having base table master and detail. i can insert upadate the records.
    requirement: creating the global temp table for same form. sothat data save only form session.
    for this i created 2 global temp table having same structure required for same form.
    i changes the property for block as base table to global temp table.
    now i am trying to save the records but not going in the temp table. as i changes the block base table property to temp tables
    as well as advance data block properties also .
    please tell me the reason? where can be the problem.
    thanks yash
    Edited by: yash_08031983 on Apr 16, 2012 1:27 AM

    i am trying to save the records but not going in the temp table.How do you check that? You cannot go to sqlplus and check if there are any records in the GTT. Data in a GTT is only visible in the current session (= only in the form).
    What is the use of a GTT here? What are you trying to achieve?

  • Global Temp table Vs Regular table

    Hi,
    I need a temp table to store few IDs (which I select from a complex query). I would be deleting the data from the temp table at the end of the session.
    From a performance perspective, I was wondering if I should be using a GLOBAL temporary table or just a regular table in which I will manually delete rows at the end.
    The tkprof showed using the global temp table expensive. If yes, I just want to confirm it and know why it is the case.
    Thanks!
    Anand

    Assuming that the cursor you open to get the transaction_id actually has a where clause, and refraining from comment on the need for dynamic column lists, I would likely do it something like:
    DECLARE
       lv_query   VARCHAR2 (32767);
       l_col_list VARCHAR2(4000);
    BEGIN
       l_col_list := control_module_common_pkg.get_columns('EPOS_TRANSACTION_HEADER',
                                                           FALSE);
       lv_query := 'INSERT INTO AK_TRANSACTION_HEADER ('||l_col_list||
                   ' ) SELECT '||l_col_list||' FROM EPOS_TRANSACTION_HEADER
                   WHERE ETH_TRANSACTION_ID IN (SELECT eth_transaction_id
                                                FROM epos_transaction_header
                                                WHERE <whatever would be in the cursor>)';
       EXECUTE IMMEDIATE lv_query;
       COMMIT;
    END;If there really is no where clause ion the cursor, then it would simply be:
    DECLARE
       lv_query   VARCHAR2 (32767);
       l_col_list VARCHAR2(4000);
    BEGIN
       l_col_list := control_module_common_pkg.get_columns('EPOS_TRANSACTION_HEADER',
                                                           FALSE);
       lv_query := 'INSERT INTO AK_TRANSACTION_HEADER ('||l_col_list||
                   ' ) SELECT '||l_col_list||' FROM EPOS_TRANSACTION_HEADER';
       EXECUTE IMMEDIATE lv_query;
       COMMIT;
    END;In either case, I would also re-consider the commit in the procedure. It should perhaps be the caller of this procedure that issues the commit, not the procedure itself.
    John

  • Global Temp Table, always return  zero records

    I call the procedure which uses glbal temp Table, after executing the Proc which populates the Global temp table, i then run select query retrieve the result, but it alway return zero record. I am using transaction in order to avoid deletion of records in global temp table.
    whereas if i do the same thing in SQL navigator, it works
    Cn.ConnectionString = Constr
    Cn.Open()
    If FGC Is Nothing Then
    Multiple = True
    'Search by desc
    'packaging.pkg_msds.processavfg(null, ActiveInActive, BrandCode, Desc, Itemtype)
    SQL = "BEGIN packaging.pkg_msds.processavfg(null,'" & _
    ActiveInActive & "','" & _
    BrandCode & "','" & _
    Desc & "','" & _
    Itemtype & "'); end;"
    'Here it will return multiple FGC
    'need to combine them
    Else
    'search by FGC
    SQL = "BEGIN packaging.pkg_msds.processavfg('" & FGC & "','" & _
    ActiveInActive & "','" & _
    BrandCode & "',null,null); end;"
    'will alway return one FGC
    End If
    ' SQL = " DECLARE BEGIN rguo.pkg_msds.processAvedaFG('" & FGC & "'); end;"
    Stepp = 1
    Cmd.Connection = Cn
    Cmd.CommandType = Data.CommandType.Text
    Cmd.CommandText = SQL
    Dim Trans As System.Data.OracleClient.OracleTransaction
    Trans = Cn.BeginTransaction()
    Cmd.Transaction = Trans
    Dim Cnt As Integer
    Cnt = Cmd.ExecuteNonQuery
    'SQL = "SELECT rguo.pkg_msds.getPDSFGMass FROM dual"
    SQL = "select * from packaging.aveda_mass_XML"
    Cmd.CommandType = Data.CommandType.Text
    Cmd.CommandText = SQL
    Adp.SelectCommand = Cmd
    Stepp = 2
    Adp.Fill(Ds)
    If Ds.Tables(0).Rows.Count = 0 Then
    blError = True
    BlComposeXml = True
    Throw New Exception("No Record found for FGC(Finished Good Code=)" & FGC)
    End If
    'First Row, First Column contains Data as XML
    Stepp = 0
    Trans.Commit()

    Hi,
    This forum is for Oracle's Data Provider and you're using Microsoft's, but I was curious so I went ahead and tried it. It works fine for me. Here's the complete code I used, could you point out what are you doing differently?
    Cheers,
    Greg
    create global temporary table abc_tab(col1 varchar2(10));
    create or replace procedure ins_abc_tab(v1 varchar2) as
    begin
    insert into abc_tab values(v1);
    end;
    using System;
    using System.Data;
    using System.Data.OracleClient;
    class Program
        static void Main(string[] args)
            OracleConnection con = new OracleConnection("data source=orcl;user id=scott;password=tiger");
            con.Open();
            OracleTransaction txn = con.BeginTransaction();
            OracleCommand cmd = new OracleCommand("begin ins_abc_tab('foo');end;", con);
            cmd.Transaction = txn;
            cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
            cmd.CommandText = "select * from abc_tab";
            OracleDataAdapter da = new OracleDataAdapter(cmd);
            DataSet ds = new DataSet();
            da.Fill(ds);
            Console.WriteLine("rows found: {0}", ds.Tables[0].Rows.Count);
            // commit, cleanup, etc ommitted for clarity
    }

  • Global Temp Table Not found - SSIS

    I am facing below error while using global temp table in SSIS.
    [OLE DB Destination [78]] Error: SSIS Error Code DTS_E_OLEDBERROR.  An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80040E37.
    An OLE DB record is available.  Source: "Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 10.0"  Hresult: 0x80040E37  Description: "Table/view either does not exist or contains errors.".
    [OLE DB Destination [78]] Error: Failed to open a fastload rowset for " ##AGENTDTLS". Check that the object exists in the database.
    [SSIS.Pipeline] Error: component "OLE DB Destination" (78) failed the pre-execute phase and returned error code 0xC0202040.
    1) For data connection manager - Retain same connection is set to True
    2) Data Flow task - Delay Validation is set to True
    3) Destination Task - Using Temp Table - ValidateExternalMetadata is set to false.
    4) I am just using one data connection.
    5) before using the temp file I am checking if its exits and if yes drp it first and create it.
    Not able to understand the reason for failure.

    Why don't you use permanent table in tempdb?
    Kalman Toth Database & OLAP Architect
    SQL Server 2014 Design & Programming
    New Book / Kindle: Exam 70-461 Bootcamp: Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012

  • Global temp table problem w/ODP?

    I'm using the current version of the ODP .NET data adapter to access a global temporary table on an Oracle
    9.2.0.4.0 server created with -
    CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE euik_dex_open_tasks_temp1
    (resource_id NUMBER,
    task_assignment_id NUMBER,
    task_id NUMBER,
    incident_id NUMBER,
    customer_product_id NUMBER,
    inventory_item_id NUMBER,
    contract_service_id NUMBER)
    ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS
    (See below for what is returned from the data dictionary for this table)
    If I use SQLPlus to insert a row into this table, then query the table immediately, I see the inserted row.
    If I use the same exact SQL through the ODP adapter, the ExecuteNonQuery statement returns the fact the 1 row was inserted. However, doing a SELECT from the table immediately after the INSERT, no rows are returned. See the .NET test ap, below.
    Also, note that if I use a global temp table made with ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS, the ODP adapter works fine.
    What am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance...
    Pat
    Private Sub TestTempTable()
    Dim Str1 As New System.Text.StringBuilder
    Dim Strx As New System.Text.StringBuilder
    Dim StrOut As New System.Text.StringBuilder
    Dim nInsert As Integer
    Dim nRow As Integer
    'Insert into the global temp table
    Str1.Append("INSERT INTO euik_dex_open_tasks_temp1(resource_id, " & vbCrLf)
    Str1.Append("      task_Assignment_id, " & vbCrLf)
    Str1.Append("     task_id, " & vbCrLf)
    Str1.Append("     incident_id, " & vbCrLf)
    Str1.Append("     customer_product_id, " & vbCrLf)
    Str1.Append("     inventory_item_id, " & vbCrLf)
    Str1.Append("     contract_service_id) " & vbCrLf)
    Str1.Append(" VALUES(1,2,3,4,5,6,7)" & vbCrLf)
    Dim cn As New Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleConnection
    Dim dr As Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleDataReader
    Dim cd As New Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleCommand
    Try
    cn.ConnectionString = "Data Source=XXX;User ID=mickey;Password=mouse;"
    cd.CommandType = CommandType.Text
    cd.Connection = cn
    cn.Open()
    'Run the query to load data in the temp table
    cd.CommandText = Str1.ToString()
    nInsert = cd.ExecuteNonQuery()
    MessageBox.Show(nInsert & " row(s) inserted.")
    'See if there are rows in the temp table
    Strx.Append("Select * from euik_dex_open_tasks_temp1")
    cd.CommandText = Strx.ToString()
    dr = cd.ExecuteReader
    nRow = 0
    While dr.Read
    StrOut.Append(dr(0) & vbCrLf)
    nRow = nRow + 1
    End While
    MessageBox.Show(nRow & " row(s) selected.")
    Catch ex As OracleClient.OracleException
    MessageBox.Show(ex.Message)
    Catch ex As Exception
    MessageBox.Show(ex.Message)
    Finally
    cn.Close()
    End Try
    End Sub
    OWNER     TABLE_NAME     TABLESPACE_NAME     CLUSTER_NAME     IOT_NAME     PCT_FREE     PCT_USED     
    INI_TRANS     MAX_TRANS     INITIAL_EXTENT     NEXT_EXTENT     MIN_EXTENTS     MAX_EXTENTS     PCT_INCREASE     
    FREELISTS     FREELIST_GROUPS     LOGGING     BACKED_UP     NUM_ROWS     BLOCKS     EMPTY_BLOCKS     AVG_SPACE     
    CHAIN_CNT     AVG_ROW_LEN     AVG_SPACE_FREELIST_BLOCKS     NUM_FREELIST_BLOCKS     DEGREE     INSTANCES     
    CACHE     TABLE_LOCK     SAMPLE_SIZE     LAST_ANALYZED     PARTITIONED     IOT_TYPE     TEMPORARY     
    SECONDARY     NESTED     BUFFER_POOL     ROW_MOVEMENT     GLOBAL_STATS     USER_STATS     DURATION     
    SKIP_CORRUPT     MONITORING     CLUSTER_OWNER     DEPENDENCIES     COMPRESSION
    APPS     EUIK_DEX_OPEN_TASKS_TEMP1                    10     40     1     255               
                   1     1     NO     N                                        
         1     1     N     ENABLED               NO          Y     N     NO     
    DEFAULT     DISABLED     NO     NO     SYS$TRANSACTION     DISABLED     NO          DISABLED     
    DISABLED

    Andrew,
    As David indicated if you do not wish to have "auto commit mode" you just need to use a transaction object to manually control the transaction.
    I'm just nervous at the idea of ODP.NET initiating interactions I am not aware of.I think it would be more fair to say "finishing interactions" in this case rather than "initiating interactions" but you could always just run a SQL trace from the database to see exactly what is happening if you are concerned.
    HTH,
    - Mark
    =======================================
    Mark A. Williams
    Oracle DBA
    Author, Professional .NET Oracle Programming
    http://www.apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=378

  • Global temp table in Oracle EBS

    hi gurus,
    i have a GTT with "ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS".
    i am populating this table through an OAF page and displaying the data.
    as per the documentation it should delete the data from the table once user logs out from the Oracle EBS but it's not happening.
    the user still sees the records from the previous session.
    please throw some light here.
    thanks,

    i was wondering if there is any sysadmin level setup/profile setup which can end the session (JDBC) once user logs out?No such profile option exists.
    Behavior of Global Temp Table in JDBC
    Behavior of Global Temp Table in JDBC
    Global temp tables with connection pooling
    http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:4444273995237
    Make global temporary tables transaction specific
    http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:868691300346807468
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Can a tabular form be created/used against a GLOBAL TEMP TABLE?

    We are trying to simplify our apex applications. In doing so, we are examing the many collections we use to create tablular forms. These collections currently are tricky to manage and we are considering moving them to either VIEWS or GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLES (GTT).
    I have created a test app against a GLOBAL TEMP TABLE....it looks great, but when I add a row and SUBMIT I recieve a message indicating record is inserted....but where did it go? I am unable to retrieve...I cannot see it in the underlying GLOBAL TEMP TABLE (as expected)....
    should I be creating an ON INSERT table on the GTT to automatically insert the data into a regular table?

    Now you know why you have to use collections :) Answered here:
    working with global temp table and apex
    Has to do with the session management and how APEX handles it.
    Create a view on your collection using the column names from the source table. Use packages to write an update, delete and insert process. This can be written automatically if there are multiple collections to handle.
    Denes Kubicek
    http://deneskubicek.blogspot.com/
    http://www.apress.com/9781430235125
    http://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=31517:1
    http://www.amazon.de/Oracle-APEX-XE-Praxis/dp/3826655494
    -------------------------------------------------------------------

  • Use of Oracle global temp table in BI Publisher

    Hi All,
    I have witten a function which populates a Gobal temp table.I call the function and do a select on the global temp table.This fails to give me any result.
    We are calling the function within the package in the 'beforeReport' trigger in our Data Template in BI Publisher.
    I tried to check the session id and found that the sessions are different when we execute the functiona and when we do a select query.
    How can I avoid this situation of changing session?
    I have tried by removing commit from the function but even thta didnt help.
    Please let me know if anyone has suugestion on this.
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi,
    To check if the function is working fine , we inserted the output from temp table into a normal physical table .We queried the physical table and found the values there.
    So , the function is working fine.
    We dont have any statement like 'PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION ' in our function.
    Do we need to add it?
    Just to clarify the issue , We have populated the temp table by calling a function and after that we are trying to query the temp table.However, it appears that the session changes between teh function call and issuing of select query .This is resultin into no data being fetched as the values in Gloabal temp table persist only for a session.
    Thanks!

Maybe you are looking for

  • Address Book, how do I see what account the contact is from?

    In OS X Lion, Address Book, I have many names listed 2,3,4 times. Would like to know what account they belong to (Exchange, On my Mac, Mobile Me etc.) so that I can delete the extra ones. In address book, can I select the contact and see what account

  • How can I automatically archive my text messages?

    Is there a way to archive my text message conversations somewhere (iCloud, Gmail, Dropbox) and have them automatically sync at regular intervals? Please note I'm talking about ongoing archival, not just restoring a backup. Thanks for any tips.

  • Premiere Elements file type for Elements Organiser

    I use PSE13 organiser ( for pictures and movies) and editor. I recently purchased Premiere Elements 13 and have just edited my first movie. I would like to only access Premiere Elements via the Photoshop Elements organiser, but I am unsure what file

  • 'Kernel_task' 100% usage. DigiDesign 003.

    Hi, I need some help! Whenever I stream audio using my DigiDesign 003 (FireWIre Audio Interface) Kernel_Task ramps straight up to 100% CPU usage on Core 1. I know that the interface is not supported on Yosemite. However, it is frustrating that the dr

  • Images from Illustrator to DW don't show

    I resisted moving away from CS2 and GoLive for a long time, but finally threw in the towel and recently bought CS4 web premium.  GoLive was like your favorite pair of old jeans you wore on a Saturday morning [sigh]..  Anyway. Photoshop was always my