Question about keyword searches

Hi,
When I am searching a large collection of pictures by keyword, how should I set Aperture such that if I select 1 keyword, the ONLY OTHER keywords that Aperture shows me and allows me to select are those that already contain the first keyword I had selected?
So for example, if I select the keyword "SAN FRANCISO" then all the remaining keywords that I am able to select should not be my entire collection of keywords, but rather only those that exist within photos that currently also have a tag of SAN FRANCISO on them. By this logic, then, I am unlikely to see the tag "EGYPT" but more likely to see the tag "Coffeeshop".
Any ideas?

Neil Barman wrote:
Hi,
When I am searching a large collection of pictures by keyword, how should I set Aperture such that if I select 1 keyword, the ONLY OTHER keywords that Aperture shows me and allows me to select are those that already contain the first keyword I had selected?
So for example, if I select the keyword "SAN FRANCISO" then all the remaining keywords that I am able to select should not be my entire collection of keywords, but rather only those that exist within photos that currently also have a tag of SAN FRANCISO on them. By this logic, then, I am unlikely to see the tag "EGYPT" but more likely to see the tag "Coffeeshop".
Any ideas?
if I understand u correctly, yes.
-- Include if "All" of the following "Match" -- (instead of "Any")
so a search for "San Francisco" will only show San Francisco, if not, you'll get San Diego, San Pedro,...if "All" is not selected, as oppose to "Any"

Similar Messages

Few questions about Spotlight searches in Leopard

I have a few questions about Spotlight searches in the menu bar & Finder in Leopard:
1. When doing a search in the Finder window how do I get back the grouped items view? (Docs grouped together, bookmarks grouped together etc. Same as in Tiger).
2. How do I set Spotlight searches in Finder to always default to search by 'File Name' instead of 'Contents' & in the folder I'm in rather than 'This Mac'?
3. In the Spotlight menu bar results how do I disable dictionary meaning for things I type in there?

Jono H
Can't answer them all:
1. Sort on 'Kind' - click the Kind header
2. If you're in a Folder and want to do a filename search, don't use spotlight, just start to type the name... So, if you're in Applications, just type iwo and you'll get your iWork...
3. ... I have no idea
Regards
TD

Quick question on KEYWORD Search

Hello,
Any idea how does a Keyword Search works ..Could not find any good documentation .
I have an issue with customer where they are doing a key word search on 3 words and not pulling the data since all the 3 words are not matched.If we try to do a search with 2 matching words it pulls up the data.
Its in iRecruitment Vacancy search feature which uses Oracle text.
How to do Keyword search with multiple words for an AND and OR Condition.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Gopi

From Technet:
Role-based administration does not support an explicit deny action on security roles, security scopes, or collections assigned to an administrative
user. Instead, configure security roles, security scopes, and collections to grant permissions to administrative users. If users do not have permissions to objects by use of these role-based administration elements, they might have only partial access to some
objects, for example they might be able to view, but not modify specific objects. However, you can use collection membership to exclude collections from a collection that is assigned to an administrative user.
Cheers
Paul | sccmentor.wordpress.com

Questions about keyword hierarchy

I'm in the process of designing and building a keyword hierarchy for LR3.5, and I'm at a loss to understand a couple of things.
In the process of deciding how to build this, I've looked at a number of hierarchies people have posted to the web. One thing I've noted is that people sometimes have the same word in multiple hierarchies, and sometimes the same word as both a regular entry and as a synonym. For example:
Architecture
      Building
          Church
                  {Cathedral}
          Cathedral
          Skyscraper.....
Cities
      Building
      Cathedral....
So what happens if I use the keyword building?
I *think* what will happen is that LR gives me a choice of selecting Building>Architecture OR Building>Cities. Is that correct?   Is there a way to get Building, Cities AND Architecture? What happens if I select Cities? Do I get ONLY cities, and none of the lower level keywords?
And I'm at a total loss about synonyms. If, while applying keywords to an image, I select the synonym {Cathedral}, under Architecture, what keyword(s) get assigned to the image? What if I select Church? And what if I select Cathedral under Cities?
Many thanks.

Thanks web-weaver.
I posted basically the same question in a couple of other places, and got conflicting answers. And the information I found on web searches tended to explain HOW to set up a hierarchy, but not how it really worked, and information on synonyms is especially limited, and often conflicting. So I did some tests. So as to not use any words that were already in my keyword list, I built a simple hierarchy of words not currently in use:
Colors
    Blue
        {Cyan}
        {Azure}
    Red
        Pink
                        Salmon
        Rose
    Green
        {BRG}
        {Emerald}
    Cyan
    Orange
Fruit
    Orange
    Apple
(I actually had a couple of other trees, but this is enough to demonstrate how they actually work.)
And it turns out synonyms don't work quite like I expected them to, and are, honestly, so limited I question their value.
Test1: Tag a photo with the keyword Cyan. Only Cyan gets applied to the metadata, not any of the words associated with it (Blue, Colors, Azure). Searching, I can find the image by searching on Cyan, or Colors. But NOT by searching on Blue.
Test2: Tag a photo with the keyword Blue. Only Blue gets applied to the metadata, not Cyan, or Azure. When searching, I can find it by searching on Blue, or any of it's synonyms (Cyan, Azure), or Colors.
(I had expected synonyms to work the other way, I think. So that if I searched on Blue I'd get all images tagged with Blue, but also those tagged with Azure and Cyan. )
Test3: Tag one photo with Cyan, and another with Blue. Searching with Cyan gets me both images, as does searching with Colors. Searching on Blue gets me only the image tagged with Blue.
Test 4: Tag a photo with the word Colors (and nothing else). I find it by searching ONLY on colors, not Blue, Cyan, or Azure.
Test 5: Tag a photo with the word Red (and nothing else). I find it by searching on Red, or Colors, but not Pink or Rose.
Test 6: Tag a photo with the word Pink (and nothing else). I find it by searching on Pink, Red or Colors, but not Salmon.
Test 7: Tag one photo with Orange->Color, and a second image with Orange->Fruit (this nomenclature seems backwards to me, btw. It's really Fruit-Orange and Color-Orange, but whatever...) Searching on Orange finds both images. Searching on Color finds only one, searching on Fruit finds only the other.
Synonyms affect only search, and not tagging (assignment). Searching on a term that is a synonym will find images tagged with the main word. (e.g., search on Azure and you'll find Blue, but not Colors).
On another site someone replied that when you search you'll find "any image which bears that keyword or any keyword BELOW it in the hierarchy." That's backwards, at least as I understand the word "above.". You'll actually find images using the keyword, it's alias, or any word ABOVE it in the hierarchy. So if an image is tagged with Red, you can find it by searching on Red or Colors, but not Pink. If the image is tagged with pink, you can find it with Colors, Red or Pink, but not Salmon.
The worst limitation of using synonyms is that when you're tagging an image, LR3 isn't smart enough to know the synonyms exist. So if I tag an image with the word Azure, LR3 doesn't substitute Blue, or use the synonym where it already exists in the hierarchy. Instead, creates a new, top level entry named Azure, not tied in any way to the alias or the "Colors" tree.
It seems like it would be useful to be able to enter Blue as a search term and find any images tagged with Azure and Cyan. Or enter Red as a search term and find Pink and Rose, too. The way it's implemented now forces you to enter the term you're most likely to use (Blue, for example) at the bottom of the hierarchy, and the least used words above. Or to use synonyms, and hope you never get confused an enter a synonym as a keyword instead of the word it refers to.
It seems to me it's more useful to just use Azure as another keyword beneath (or maybe above) Blue in the hierarchy. At least that way if I tag an image with Azure, I'm not creating a new entry in the Keyword list. I'm not sure I see much value in synonyms as they're currently implemented, but if someone has some examples of how synonyms benefit them I'd be delighted to see them.
Hopefully this information will be of use to someone.

Question about binary search tree

i was asked to do a programe that generating 1000 random integer numbers between 1 - 50, storing each unique number and it's corresponding occurrence into a binary search tree and output them in asending order. Therefore, before, adding the new number into the tree, i have to compare it with others that have been stored in the tree. and i did it in the following code segment.
public void compare(int number)
   NumberObject newNumObj = new NumberObject(number);
   boolean b = true;
   if(isEmpty())
    root = new BinarySearchTreeNode(newNumObj, null, null); //assuming BSTNode class in somewhere else
   else
    b = find(root, newNumObj);
    if(b == false)
     add(newNumObj);
private boolean find(BinarySearchTreeNode node, NumberObject newNumObj)
    int relation = ((Comparable)newNumObj).compareTo(node.getObject());
    //******************** QUESTION IS HERE ******************
    if(relation == 0)
     (node.getObject()).setCount(); //increase that number object's account
      newNumObj = null; //recycle newNumObj if it's the same as one stored in the tree
      return true;
   //****************** ENDS QUESTION ********************************
    else if(relation > 0)
      find(node.right, newNumObj);
    else if(relation < 0)
      find(node.left, newNumObj);
   return false;
my question is can i say the new number is the same as the one that already stored in the tree according to the above code? i am not sure cauz there are two attributes: the number and it's frequency stored in one numberObject. and the compareTo method just dealing with the numbers, but nothing particular associated with it's account. so, could anyone help me work out this puzzle? help would be greatly appreciated!

Not sure whether this is what you want.. But may be it will help....
import java.util.*;
public class Rand{
     public static void main(String arg[]){
          new Rand();
     Rand(){
          Random random=new Random();
          int ranNo;
          TreeMap map=new TreeMap();
          Integer in;
          for(int i=0;i<1000;i++){
               ranNo= random.nextInt() ;
               ranNo=Math.abs(ranNo);
               ranNo%=50;
               in=new Integer(ranNo);
               if(!(map.containsKey(in)))
                    map.put(in,i+"");
          Iterator iter=map.keySet().iterator();
          Integer key;
          while(iter.hasNext()){
               System.out.print( (key=(Integer)iter.next()) + " ");
               System.out.println(map.get(key).toString());
}appu

Question about google search and icons on iphone interface icons.

Hey everyone. I noticed that I can look up images on google but nothing comes up when I do a web search on anything I got what I needed from yahoo but the page just stays blank on Google. I restarted my iphone with no luck. Has anybody else noticed this issue or is it a preferences setting? My second question is, can I get rid of things I don't want on my iphone interface like the weather or stocks programs (icons). Thanks for the help.
-Mike

Thanks for getting back to me. What I meant by my first question is, when I go into Safari and then select google in the bookmarks I can't get a result when I enter a key word in the search field on the Google page. I touch the search window and the keyboard pops up. I put in something I want to search for and nothing happens. Any ideas would be great.
Thanks.
-Mike

A question about keyword tags

Is it possible in settings... or somewhere, to set it so that when you open (PrE9's) organizer instead of starting with keyword hierarchy list - it could open on keyword cloud view? I am not so keen on the hierrarchy method...
Thanks.
brush

I did some experimenting in the Elements 9 Organizer.
1-- yes, when you close the Organizer then it does always seem to come up next time with the Thumbnail grid AND the Tags panel on the right is set to Hierarchy view. Then you must click on the icon for Cloud view.
2-- my conclusion is that if I click on the Cloud icon after starting the Organizer, then it was staying as Cloud in the Keyword Tags panel to the right of the Thumbnails for the duration that the Organizer is open.
3-- Note that if you use Full Screen for viewing your photos, then for the "Quick Organize" panel that drags out from the left side of the screen near the bottom, the default for Keyword Tags is Cloud. This is a different method of working which you may or may not like: however since it does set Cloud I decided to mention it.
FYI - to get to Full Screen you can use the pull down menu for the Display icon (that is next to the House icon on the top bar of the main Organizer screen). Choose the option "View, Edit, Organize in Full Screen". FYI - I usually select the thumbnails of the photos which I want to Organize before I go in to Full Screen.

Question about keyword hierarchies

Hi, I'm relatively new to Lightroom. I'm seeing an "interesting" behavior with respect to hierarchical keywords and I'd like to understand if it is correct.
To start with, I've got an example keyword hierarchy for aircraft:
So far so good. Now, I have brought some images into Lightroom that have all of those keywords (aircraft, boeing, b-17 flying fortress, texas raiders) in the image. These keywords were inserted by another application, prior to me switching to Lightroom and importing into Lightroom. After importing into Lightroom, I arranged these in a hierarchy. So, when I select one of those images, the keyword panel looks like this, indicating that all four of those keywords are explicitly assigned to the selected image:
Now, I find that if I export a version of this image with "Write Keywords as Lightroom Hierarchy", then the actual Keyword metadata field in the file contains this:
     air show, aircraft, airshow, b-17 flying fortress, boeing, monochrome, texas raiders, aircraft | boeing, aircraft | boeing | b-17 flying fortress, aircraft | boeing | b-17 flying fortress | texas raiders
I understand that this is the actual keywords, followed by the hierarchical keyword paths. However, I notice that parts of the hierarchical path are repeated. In other words, the above includes all of the following:
     aircraft | boeing
     aircraft | boeing | b-17 flying fortress
     aircraft | boeing | b-17 flying fortress | texas raiders
Is this because the "boeing" and "b-17 flying fortress" keywords have been explicitly assigned to the image, in addition to these keywords being inherited from the lower level keywords which are also explcitly assigned?
What I would like to see in the exported file is the list of keywords plus just the one long hierarchical path from bottom-to-top, without the "pieces", like this:
     aircraft | boeing | b-17 flying fortress | texas raiders
I notice I can get that if only if I unassign all keywords except for the lowest-level keyword, like this:
Is this expected behavior? I assume that it is.
The problem I am having is this. In my pre-Lightroom days, I had all these keywords assigned directly to the images without any hierarchy whatsoever. I imported them into Lightroom, and then arranged the keyword hierarchy inside Lightroom's Keyword List panel. Now, as a result of all keywords in the hierarchy being explicitly assigned, I'm seeing parts of the hierarchy repeated when I export (as shown above), and it is "messy".
Is there any way to clean this up without it being a totally manual process?
Does it harm anything to leave it as-is (i.e. with repeated parts of hierarchy)?
Thank you
Chris

Thank you John, KeywordConsolidator has a "Remove Parents" function which (if I understand the description correctly) will do what I'm looking for.

Some questions about standard search help in WD4A

Hello all,
I use the SAP standard search help for a business partner number input field. It works fine, but I need to customize the result popup a bit. I have the following issues:
1. After the search I get a table with a list of all found business partners. The columns are not sortable. Can I change them to sortable (as in SAP GUI)?
2. How can I add another field/column to the result list (birth date)?
3. Per default 10 hits are shown on one page in this result table. Is it possible to show more hits at once?
Best regards and thanks for all help,
Matthias

Hi Matthias,
first of all let's say that the Search Help has been changed a lot in the different SP level.
Looking in a NW7.0 SP12 I can see that:
1. It's not possible
2. You have to change the Search Help definition in DDIC (/nSE11)
3. Via the Settings link in the TOP LEFT you can change the value (but in my system it is set to 500)
Keep in mind that WDA support a freely programmed Search Help where you can do everything you want...but it requires coding...
Sergio

Question about AD search filter

Hi,
I'm a newbie here. I've AD to OID sync and have the following search filter in the mapping parameters.
searchfilter=(|(objectclass=group)(objectclass=organizational unit)(|(&(objectclass=user)(!(objectclass=computer)))))
Can someone explain what this filter exactly does?
Sync is working for regular users but I want to get users who are members of some groups. How to I change the filter to get groups and members within groups?
Thanks in advance.

It all depends how the code is written. Somewhere there is going to be a setting that says what your multivalue group objectlass is. The frist query will pull your users, and the second will get the userID for each user and query again for that user's groups. Since the groups are not actually on the user profile, the user's are on the group profile.
-Kevin
PS - Don't forget to give points where points are earned.

Question about Google search results

All-
I have a site created using iWeb, hosted at MobileMe, with a domain name from GoDaddy. Everything works fine, but searching for my name in Google returns my MobileMe address (web.mac.com/theburians/) instead of my domain name (theburians.com).
Any ideas/suggestions to fix that?
Thanks!
-Arnold

Thanks for the reply.
However, I'd like web.mac.com account to never show up in Google search results...just the godaddy domain name. (Basically, how any other site works.)
Any ideas?
Thanks!

Question about Google Search results on iPad 2

The "results" page that comes up when I do a Google Search is not back-lit and I cannot select any of the websites in the results. How do I gain access to the sites found in the Google Search?

Try this and see if this helps.
Tap Settings, then tap Safari on the left side. Then on the right side - tap clear history, clear cookies, clear cache. Clear all three. Reboot your iPad. Hold down on the sleep button at the top until the red slider appears and slide to power off. Then hold down on the sleep button until the Apple logo appears and the iPad will restart. Launch Safari and see if it helped.

A question about keyword "REPLACE"

I have a section of codes like below.I want the replace statement to make the test2 into "send from kevin".
But unfortunately I got "send from kevin".To many spaces, you see.
So how can I got the right replacement?
Thanks for your help
REPORT ZBOB01.
DATA test1(10) TYPE C VALUE 'from'.
DATA test2(20) TYPE C VALUE 'send && kevin'.
REPLACE '&&' WITH test1 into test2.
WRITE test2.

Hi,
Plz try this, we need to make test1 size to 4.
REPORT ZBOB01.
*DATA test1(4) TYPE C VALUE 'from'.*
DATA test2(20) TYPE C VALUE 'send && kevin'.
REPLACE '&&' WITH test1 into test2.
WRITE test2.
This will help.
plz reward if useful.
thanks,
dhanashri.

Question about searching

Hi all,
I'm considering Oracle BDBJE for a project that stores visited url's (data) based on a key of ip-address (4 bytes) combined with a date (long) to make the keys unique.
If want to search on date (ignore ip) do I have to make a secondary database that has the date of the visited url's as primary index?
Does a method like Cursor.getSearchKeyRange, if supplied with partial key, always search a the beginning of the key? Or could I use it to search for a date by only supplying the date-part of the key? Prop. in this case the bytes for the date will be mistaken for the bytes of the ip-address that comes first in the key.
Thanks for any help.
regards,
Jeroen

Hi Jeroen,
I'm not sure I have all of your data model yet, but I think you've given us enough for me to say you should likely try one or possibly two secondary databases.
If you have not already done so you should review the documentation on Secondary Indexes as found here:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/je/GettingStartedGuide/indexes.html
Inserting/Modifying records is faster without using a secondary index. But the queries that you have identified would perform better with secondary indexes. But you should experiment with a few different approaches and compare that with your performance goals.
Also, if you have not already thought about this, I would consider using DPL to implement this, especially since you will be evaluating alternative database designs. You will find that the implementation time is faster and you can also make changes quickly.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/je/PersistenceAPI/BerkeleyDB-JE-Persistence-GSG.pdf
You know your data best, but based on the info you provided here are my thoughts/alternatives:
Primary Database key = IP/Date or Maybe Date/IP is better if the Secondary for IP address exists
data = URL plus other data not sure what
Secondary Database Key = URL (I left out date because you said it is not likely that the same URL will exist for multiple dates).
Possible Secondary Database Key = IP address (Which URL's were visited by IP X).
Again, I think you may want to try out something like this a model your inserts and also your query performance. Feel free to post further questions about any results you are getting as you move forward.
Also, if you have not already seen this I would keep this URL handy and consult with it before you post:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/berkeley-db/faq/je_faq.html
I hope this helps!
Ron

AutoSPInstaller - Question about Search Topology

Hello,
I would deploy a new sharepoint infrastructure with autospinstaller and i have some questions about search topology.
This infrastructure will host at end 2 EDM (10-20TO) and probably some user sites.
I will provision 2 WFE and 2 APPS.
Search Topology (4 servers) =>
- Crawl Component :
SRVA & SRVB
- Query Component :
SRVC & SRVD
- Search Query and Site Settings Service :
SRVA & SRVB
- Admin Component :
SRVA & SRVB
- Index Component :
SRVC & SRVD
- Content Processing Component :
SRVA & SRVB
- Analytics Porcessing Component :
SRVA & SRVB
I read many articles about this subject but all were different !
Anyone can apply my choice or make me a proposition ?

Hi,
I just want confirme that the infrastructure is correct before deploy it. Do i really need to isolate admin component, for now i put it on only one app server.
For "Distributed caching", i planned to install it on both WFE servers.
Thank you for your help.
Jeremy

Question about keyword searches

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for