Question about lightroom tutorials

Why aren't adobetv videos tutorials for lightroom able to play in either firefox 21 or IE 10? I have tried both browsers and the video area is black with no play button. Weird. There isn't an ad blocker on -- I need help. Anyone?

I use IE10 and I have no problem watching Adobe videos.
So you must have either a slow internet connection or a setting in your web-browsers prevents the display of the videos.
If slow internet connection: Wait some time until your computer was able to download enough "buffer" for the video to start. Since internet connections often vary in speed (depending on the usage) the computer downloads a portion of the video in advance before the video starts in order to have a "buffer" when the download slows down.
If it is not that, check the security settings for your web browsers, and also allow pop-ups for the Adobe website.

Similar Messages

  • I have a question about Lightroom 5... I used it last night, I go to get on it today and its will not open. I have an error msg "Lightroom encountered an error when reading from its preview cache and needs to quit" Lightroom will attempt to fix the proble

    I have a question about Lightroom 5... I used it last night, I go to get on it today and its will not open. I have an error msg "Lightroom encountered an error when reading from its preview cache and needs to quit" Lightroom will attempt to fix the problem when reopened

    https://forums.adobe.com/message/6219922#6219922
    See if the issue in the thread above helps you to solve your problem.

  • Fundamental Question about Lightroom and saving images

    I have to laugh as I get ready to pose this question because I've been working with the program for two weeks with Scott Kelby's book and with Lynda.com, and I'm still profoundly confused about what is happening to the photo. To wit: I open a camera raw file in lightroom and start playing with it, even taking snapshots at various stages along the way. If I don't export the photo to Photoshop and save it there, what becomes of these changes? Do they stay with the photo always? Do they disappear when I shut down the program? There's no SAVE button with Lightroom which just plain flummoxes me! Can anyone 'splain this to me, please? Thanks.

    To clarify. Nothing happens to your originals. Lightroom stores the edits in a database (and if you wish alongside the original in a xmp sidecar file) as a set of instructions that the program uses to recreate the end product by following the instructions. These instructions are changed in the database while you're changing parameter values in Lightroom, so there is no need to save. Also, Lightroom stores a history of changes you did, so you can always go back. Both Lightroom and Adobe's camera raw plugin for photoshop can be used to follow the set if instructions. This way, you always get the highest fidelity image and you can always go back to your development choices without loosing any quality or having to dig up backups. Because of this, you can create multiple virtual copies with different development approaches without having to make a copy of the original and therefore saving you gobs and gobs of disk space. When you need a file for consumption such as a jpeg for a web page, simply export a copy, which burns in your development changes in a developed copy (just like printing a negative would have in the olden days) and trash the copy when you're done with it. You can always recreate it very quickly. This is a radically different approach than you're probably used to.

  • Question about Lightroom 5 licence

    Hi Everyone
    I'm trying the Creative Cloud Photography plan (one-year) I have a only one question ( at the moment) If I decided to cancel my subscription after one year, what about the licence ?
    If I want to stay with that  version in my computer , do I get the licence for it ? Who is the  owner ? If I make  reinstallation in my computer how can I put back lightroom 5 in my new computer or new system without not connection with Adobe cloud ? In this case some point is not clear for me.
    Thank you

    The answer to your question is section 2.1.2.3 in the Lightroom CC EULA on this page Licenses and terms of use | Adobe

  • 2 questions about lightroom 3 and windows7

    Hi
    i have 2 questions
    1) i get lots of errors shutting down lightroom 3
    should i setup run like administrator ? i mean right click on l3 , and click on run like administrator to avoid this error (i guess the error is ntrl.exe)
    2) about the exif browswer
    i 'm a lightroom 1.4.1 users
    i did not like lightroom 2.x , but i gave a shot to lightroom 3 and i like it a lot , i guess i will upgrade soon
    1) may i customize the tool tip information ?
    i mean when i move the mouse over the thumbs, the tool tip pop up?
    i get few informations , can i customize and add more exif information
    2) there is the exif browser in the 1.4.1 ,in lightroom 3 the exif filter
    i know bridge cs4 and cs5 can read subject distance
    is there a way to edit and add subject distance in the exif filter?
    i mean the exif drop down list is poor ,there are not many exif items
    thanks
    windows 7

    1) may i customize the tool tip information ?
    i mean when i move the mouse over the thumbs, the tool tip pop up?
    i get few informations , can i customize and add more exif information
    Yes, you can. Tooltips show the same information you see in Loupe Info Overlay. Customize the overlay and you change what tooltips show. Also you can customize what the the thumbnail borders themselves show. For example, right-click on the file-name or rating label, and you can change to something else.
    2) there is the exif browser in the 1.4.1 ,in lightroom 3 the exif filter
    i know bridge cs4 and cs5 can read subject distance
    is there a way to edit and add subject distance in the exif filter?
    i mean the exif drop down list is poor ,there are not many exif items
    No. You can only read the focus distance in the Metadata panel.

  • Question about Lightroom/Photoshop CC Package

    This is the third time I've typed this.  I hope this is the last!  Basically I've been advised to subscribe to the Lightroom/Photoshop package as an individual. The website tells me the cost and I can see the forums (fora?), video tutorials and the like.  What I can't see is a definitive list of what I get for my money - support, guidance materials, length of contract and the like. I also can't see whether downloading the apps will take space on my computer (and if so, how much) or whether it's all cloud based. Surely somewhere there is a link to such a list of basic information?  If so, can someone please direct me to it?  Many thanks.

    You get Photoshop and Lightroom and they install on your machine. See the system specs for the ballpark space requirements.  You say you have already seen the forums, video tutorials, and the like.  The length of the contract depends on which contract you choose.  I don't know what "and the like" refers to as far as what else you cannot see.
    Photoshop - http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/system-requirements.html
    Lightroom - https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom/system-requirements.html
    Creative Cloud Plans
    https://creative.adobe.com/plans
    If you need more information, more specific questions will be helpful.
    Creative Cloud Learn & Support
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud.html
    Creative Cloud / Common Questions
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/faq.html

  • Curious question about Lightroom previews and Camera Raw Cache

    Posted in the Flickr Lightroom Group as well:
    I have noticed something about the Lightroom (3.6) previews and Camera Raw cache that have me puzzled.
    I create a brand new empty catalog and purge the Camera Raw Cache.
    Then I import ONE Nikon RAW (NEF) file with dimensions 2592 x 3872 (10 megapixels - 10,036,224 pixels).
    Next I export that NEF file to an uncompressed 8-bit TIFF file. You would expect the size of that TIFF file to be roughly 30 megabytes (10 megapixels x 3 bytes per RGB value) and in fact the TIFF file is 30,135,830 bytes in size. If you export the same TIFF file but specify ZIP compression the resulting file size is 10,834,038 bytes. Obviously the compression obtained here is going to be highly specific to the image but so far no surprises.
    During import I specify render 1:1 previews and I go into Loupe mode and view the entire image at 1:1 size. I also visit the develop module and do a bunch of manipulations on the image but no cropping.
    At the conclusion of all of that I exit from Lightroom and examine the size of the Camera Raw Cache folder as well as the Lightroom previews folder. It would be my expectation that the previews folder  should have a rendered full image and that the Camera Raw Cache should also have a rendered form of the raw data. What would you expect the size of those respective folders to be?
    In fact - in my trials the previews folder totals a mere 1,675,264 bytes and the Camera Raw Cache which contains one DAT file corresponding to the one cached image is merely 267,374 bytes. This does not seem like nearly enough bits to preserve the rendered image nor is there a full size image tucked away in the actual catalog either - that file is not large enough to contain that. And yet I can use Loupe mode at 1:1 size and move from image to image with no loading delays (even when importing multiple files).
    I'm wondering if I've missed something obvious in my analysis and if not, whether someone might care to speculate as to what magic Adobe is practicing here. Even if we grant them some special algorithm to compress their previews I don't see how they can achieve a compression so much greater than the ZIP-compressed TIFF file achieves.
    And for those that might think to ask - I've repeated these experiments with multiple raw images and on both the PC and MAC platforms.
    I look forward to some answers or interesting theories or perhaps someone might replicate the experiment and report findings.

    MadMan and Hal - thanks so much.
    So that was my D'Oh moment of what I was missing - the use of re-rendered JPGS as previews. That certainly does fit with the file sizes I am seeing. I had naively assumed that the previews might have tried to preserve the full fidelity of the image - But as you suggest that full fidelity is likely only there in the develop module.
    This perhaps explains another observation from the Develop module - moving from one image to another might display "Loading" either briefly or across a longer duration. My guess is that the length of the loading process might have to do more with what is cached in RAM than cached on disk in the camera raw cache. More of a shame then that 64-bit Lightroom on 64-Bit Windows cannot grab more RAM than it seems to do at present.

  • A Question about Lightroom 5

    Why do I get a message telling me my photos that I am trying to download from my canon 60d and 7d into Lightroom5,that it cant read these files.
    I have downloaded the Addons for Raw files and also Coverting to DNG, but still cant load pics into library

    Why don't you tell us exactly what you are doing and tell us about your system. You are moving the files from where to where and your OS is????

  • Question about lightroom import

    I edit a DNG photo in Photoshop CC from lightroom 5.  If I save it as a JPG, it does not go back into lightroom.  I can not see the photo in lightroom to import it.  It shows in Windows explore but not in lightroom import.

    If you save, it will go back to LR as a tiff or PSD,depending how you have your preferences set for external editing.
    If you save as the saved file will not go back to LR, you will have to synchronize or import depending on here you saved the file.
    My preference is to let the tiff go back to LR and stack alongside tthe orgonal raw file. Makes life much simpler when trying to find files.
    If I need a jpg for email or other purposes I export one in the size and flavor (Prophoto, AdobeRGB, sRGB, etc) needed for the purpose.
    HTH
    Rich

  • Question about Lightroom and Tiffen's DFx filter

    Have loaded Tiffen filter software in Elements 10 and Lightroom 4  Can find and use it in Elements but can't seem to locateit in Lightroom  What am I missing
    Message title was edited by: Brett N

    Do you mean filters as in Lens filters? Or do you mean rendering filters like Halftone and Find Edges?
    Then you mention presets. Lightroom presets are very different than Photoshop/Photoshop Elements presets. The presets are for specific modules and are only saved values for the various sliders. Presets that work in Photoshop Elements are not expect to work in Lightroom.

  • Question: about accessing Nik collection through Lightroom

    I have recently purchased and installed Nik collection. I have no problem reaching the plug-ins in Photoshopbut can't in Lightroom (except for HDR)

    Thanks!  Technology senses my fear and always makes it difficult for me! Ha! I can use the Nik programs so if I have to, I'll work on them there.
    Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:27:45 -0700
    From: [email protected]
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: question: about accessing Nik collection through Lightroom
        Re: question: about accessing Nik collection through Lightroom
        created by trihelm2 in Photoshop Lightroom - View the full discussion
    I suspect there are potential issues on some systems with the Google "combined" version, when I installed it I had recieved a copy of the Google complete version free because of my purchase history. I was advised that I could install over the Individual Plugins I had. I never got as far as trying it with Lightroom, only in Elements. The plugins appeared but the load times were abysmal and I mean realy bad , far longer than the Nik individual Installs, so I dumped it and reverted to the originals. Pity cos I wanted the Sharpen Plugin that I have'nt got. After reverting all was back to normal The Nik individual Plugins load very quickly. It was this that convinced me there is a difference in the Google setup.There are people on here with far more knowledge than me, hopefully one of them can help you, alternatively you might try asking Google for help with this.
         Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the forum to embed the image at http://forums.adobe.com/message/5232723#5232723
         Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/5232723#5232723
         To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/5232723#5232723. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
         Start a new discussion in Photoshop Lightroom by email or at Adobe Community
      For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

  • Questions about Access Manager tutorials available in netbeans site

    Hi
    Thank you for reading my post
    I have some questions about two tutoral which i find in :
    http://www.netbeans.org/kb/55/amsecurity.html and
    http://www.netbeans.org/kb/55/amsecurity-liberty.html
    here is my problem :
    we have some web services, now we want to have authentication applied for consumer who try to access our web services.
    we need to have most possible flexibility because we may deploy the server for a customer with an already established Identity database ( Database Table with user details)
    Also we need to have Transport level security using SSL.
    I read and studied both of them and now i have some questions :
    -I think Securing Web Services Using the SAML or UserNameToken is what we need for authentication and autorization of web service consumers?
    is that right?
    -Does Sun Java System Access Manager provide flexibility to authenticate user/password with a database table content?
    -How we can apply roles in Sun Java System Access Manager when we authenticate users ?
    Thanks

    Imagine that we want to have an end to end security for our web services
    we thought that we could use message level encryption to protect the soap message and also we should protect our web services from un-authenticated acess,
    we will use userName token for this.
    Our customer has large database which contains many user/password and role of those users.
    some of web services should be available to higher role (manager) and not for all users.
    so we should check a user role before we allows him/her to access a web service.
    my question is whether Sun Access manager can help us with this? or there are other configuration or packages that we should apply to have this feature.
    to explain more :
    our client side is a swing application, users enter username/password to login into system. after they loged in, we send user/pass every time user want to request some data from some services. (is it good to send user/pass every time?)
    We want Sun Access Manager to handle users authentication .
    We also need to handle role related authorization, can Sun access manager handle this?
    Thanks

  • Two questions about Camera Raw and Lightroom

    I am now shooting in RAW image format only and cataloging those images into Lightroom.
    My first question is: How do I open an image in Camera Raw from Lightroom? When I right click on an image in Lightroom it gives me a choice to edit in > Photoshop, but does not offer the choice of editing in Camera Raw. In fact, when I go outside of Lightroom and just double-click on one of those RAW images, it opens in Photoshop. What is going on? Before I installed Lightroom, double-clicking on a RAW file would cause it to open in Camera RAW.
    My second question is: Lightroom seems to have all of the same controls over processing a RAW image as the Camera Raw plug-in does. Does that mean I no longer need to open images in Camera Raw? Should I just do all of my adjustments inside of Lightroom? I take it that the sidecar xmp file is the same whether modified in Lightroom or in Camera Raw.
    Pleas set me straight on this.
    Thank You,
    Ken

    Your second question:
    My second question is: Lightroom seems to have all of the same controls over processing a RAW image as the Camera Raw plug-in does.
    Answers your first. Lightroom and ACR share code, so the rendering you get from Lightroom with the same settings is exactly the same as in ACR. What happens is that when you say "edit in Photoshop", ACR gets called by Lightroom and the Develop settings get passed along. ACR then renders the RAW with those settings and opens it in Photoshop. So, because you already have a working interface to the settings, there is no point in showing them to you again.
    Does that mean I no longer need to open images in Camera Raw? Should I just do all of my adjustments inside of Lightroom?
    That depends on your workflow. I no longer open any images in ACR directly as Lightroom provides a more effective interface in my opinion. Other people I'm sure prefer the Bridge/ACR approach.
    I take it that the sidecar xmp file is the same whether modified in Lightroom or in Camera Raw.
    Lightroom does not modify the sidecars by default. All edits are stored in the database. This allows you to have virtual copies with different Develop settings and more tricks like that. You can have Lightroom write out xmp sidecars by choosing "save metadata to file" from the metadata menu in Library or by turning on automatic xmp file generation in preferences. There is usually no real point to doing that however as the "edit in Photoshop" route works just fine. It's only really useful when you have a mixed workflow that still uses Bridge. If you share images with others, you're better off exporting dngs, or exporting subsets of images as catalogs with the images included.

  • Questions about using a PDF form online

    I have a client who wants to create an online version of a PDF form that they are currently using. I am currently trying to explain to them that this would be best done as an HTML web form, but I may not win this argument. I have only used PDFs for printed forms (either hand-written or using form fields) so I am not familiar with any problems that converting the form for use online would entail.
    When the 'Submit' button is pressed on the form, is there a way to redirect to another web page after the data is submitted? (i.e. does the PDF have access to it's outer 'environment'?)
    Are there any security issues submitting data using the PDF form as opposed to using a standard web form? (There may be sensitive data being submitted)
    I'm not sure how they plan to handle the data that is submitted, but there are several options in the submitForm parameters - I am assuming that using the HTML option would submit the data in the same format as a web form would. Am I correct here?
    Can the PDF be prevented from being downloaded or printed? This form should only be used to submit data to their server, not as a printed form.
    Are there any other 'gotchas' that I need to look out for? Does anyone have a recommendation for a site which contains any tutorials or guidelines for using PDF forms online?

    Thanks for the information.
    Yes, I agree that there is less reason for it to be a PDF form (Actually, no real reason other than the original form already exists in PDF), but I am unfortunately in the position that my input in this project is not necessarily being considered (my company is following direct -and inconsistent- directions from the client, and I have no contact with the client to ask questions about what their actual needs are). I have been told to give the client the 'Tomato' that they are asking for, even though they are describing an 'Apple'.
    The reason this form is not meant to be printed is that we have replaced the 'Signature' fields from the original form with checkboxes that the user must check to confirm they have 'signed' the document. If they are to print/fax/whatever the document, they should use the original form, not this one. And I am still trying to explain to them that this would be better served with an HTML web form, but I fear I am losing that battle.
    I have brought up the fact that it is not 100% guaranteed that Acrobat will be available in the browser, although I can only guess that it is less than likely that anyone will not have some sort of PDF viewer available to their browser.
    I will also mention that issues may arise if the file is not submitted from within the browser.

  • Newbie question about loading servlets on tomcat

    I have what is probably a very basic question about loading simple servlets on to tomcat to test its installation. I have followed instructions from numerous tutorials to the letter but still I can't get it to work.
    I have installed tomcat on win2k in c:\tomcat. I set up the jdk, environment vars (JAVA_HOME, CATALINA_HOME, TOMCAT_HOME) which all point at the correct dirs. I can compile a servlet without errors. I can also place a test jsp and html file into the root directory and they both work fine.
    However, now I am trying a test servlet and no matter what I do it gives me a 404. I have a servlet class file called "HelloServlet.class" which I placed into the %install_dir%\webapps\ROOT\WEB-INF\classes directory. I try to reference it using this url:
    http://localhost/servlet/HelloServlet
    Tomcat is configured to use port 80 and has been restarted after adding the servlet class file. Does anyone have a clue why this is not working for me?
    Many thanks
    Marc

    You have to add in the web.xml file that it is in the WEB-INF dir, the information about your servlet. An example:
    <web-app>
    <servlet>
    <servlet-name>HelloServlet</servlet-name>
    <servlet-class>HelloServlet</servlet-class>
    </servlet>
    <servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-name>HelloServlet</servlet-name>
    <url-pattern>/HelloServlet</url-pattern>
    </servlet-mapping>
    </web-app>

Maybe you are looking for