Question about processor switch

Hello,
I just got my new 21.5 imac and I was wondering if anyone has changed processors before? I know, I know....this will void my warranty and all that good stuff, but its just a question. I see that the 21.5 inch uses the LGA 775 Socket T. In theory, this machine would support up to a Core 2 Quad Q9400. Am I correct to assume this? Thanks for the help.

Even if it works "in theory," the heat dissipation design may not be sufficient to handle the additional heat. And there may be additional power draw that is not accounted for in the design. I wouldn't "assume" it will work, just because the sockets are the same.

Similar Messages

Question about Processors???

Hi there
This is just a question on the posibilities first!
We have EHP3 here and using EIC. We have HR Queries going to a certain Org Unit within EIC and anyone under that Org Unit can process, but once the Web Request is converted to an Activity, saved and Ended, then anyone who is in that Org Unit should still be able to process, but we are getting a message about not being able to process. We would like anyone in HR to be able to process any EIC, even though its assigned to a specific Processor? Any ideas on this one?
Gary

Hi Ravi
Thanks for that.... I got the data wrong... Try this again
Our example Org Unit
80000300 HR
80006084 HR Operations
80006085 HR Operations Team 1
All our EIC queries come into OU 80000300 and anyone in that org unit and below (80006084 and 80006085) can process. For example an EE in 80006085 takes the activity and becomes the processor. Now anyone in 80006084 and 80000300 needs to take that activity and become the processor. They get this message " Info: You can only create notes or add contacts for this activity"
I hope this makes better sense.
The EIC profile is assigned to all org units, as the inbound / outbound emails are be different.
In OOSB, they are not assigned to a struc auth (in QA or DEV) but are in PROD. HR Claim they used to be able to do this, but Im not sure how
Any help on this would be great....
G

Question about central switching mode

Hi team
My customer's WLC is in following mode:
central authentication, central switching—In this state, the controller handles client authentication, and all client data is tunneled back to the controller. This state is valid only in connected mode.
He want to know what is the result if the AP loss the communication with WLC.
Does the AP can still provide service to clients?
If yes, is it all services?
In my opinion, in central switching mode, AP should not provide services any more after disconnect with WLC, and cannot add any clients too.
Do we have any URL or document about detail of flexconnect?
Best regards
QxiangZh

in local mode, once the link to the WLC goes down, the AP is down.
FlexConnect is what you would need to do:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/ncs/1.1/configuration/guide/hreap.pdf
Configuratio guide
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10315/products_tech_note09186a0080b3690b.shtml
Feature Matrix
HTH,
Steve
Please remember to rate useful posts, and mark questions as answered

Question about lock switch for smart phones

i would like to ask about the lock switch for smart phones like Nokia 5800 Xpressmusic or Nokia 5230.
Will the lock switch loosen if we always slide to unlock it?

i used my 5800 for 11 months and it didn't happen at all
-you can show appreciation to my posts if it helped or useful by pressing the green Kudo star beside my post that hepled
-if my answer was the solution , so click accept as solution button
Started From Nokia 3310 , Now with Nokia N97 v.22.0.110 + N900 PR1.2

Question about silent switch?

I've had my 3gs for about 3 weeks this sunday my switch seem's to be loose can i still exchange it?

You should still be within the warranty period for the phone. You'll want to make a Genius bar appointment and discuss the issue with them at your local Apple store. Alternatively, you can call Applecare and discuss the issue with them. They will make the final determination - we can't say for certain if they will replace or not.

Question about Processors, Operating Systems and TFLOPS

Hi guys, I recently read an article about the power of the PS3 consoles. This is a table that I copied from it, which I don't really undestand. All I can see is that the Mac OSX shows the least number of TFLOPs for both PowerPC and Intel architectures. That doesn't seem to be good. If there's anyone out there who can translate the details into "basic language" I would appreciate it.
OS Type------------Current TFLOPS----Active CPUs---Total CPUs
Windows------------152--------------159564------1625622
Mac OS X/PowerPC------7----------------8737--------95371
Mac OS X/Intel---------9----------------2756----------7272
Linux----------------43---------------25126-------215901
GPU-----------------42-----------------708----------2199
PLAYSTATION®3-----516---------------21062---------22299
==============================================
Total----------------769--------------217953-------1968664
If you are further interested, or the table became unreadable, or both, this is the link to the original article.
Thank you very much in advance.
George...
MBP 15in 2.33GHz. Mac OS X (10.4.9) other 200+ posts with the old Discussion Forums (now lost)

Yes, you are misinterpreting the data.
What you're looking at is the workload on some distributed computing task like folding@home, right?
What it's telling you is that at the time you checked, Windows computers were contributing 152 TFLOPs (trillions of operations per second), PowerPC-based Macs contributed 7, Intel-based Macs added 9, and 516 from the PS3.
However, you also need to take into account the number of active machines.
Those 152 Windows TFLOPS were the combined output of 159,564 CPUs, for an average of 0.0009525958 TFLOPS/CPU.
By comparison, the 7 PowerPC TFLOPS were from 8737 CPUs, or 0..0008011903 TFLOPS/CPU - not all that much different and statistically insignificant.
The Intel Macs' 9 TFLOPS from 2756 CPUs equates to 0.0032656023 TFLOPS/CPU - significantly higher than either of the other two results.
The PS3 on the other hand contributes 516 TFLOPS from 21062 CPUs, for 0.0244990979 TFLOPS/CPU - an order of magnitude higher still.
I'd take the results with a large pinch of salt, though - is that 7 TFLOPS for the PowerPCs, 6.5, or 7.49? That makes a big difference.
Also, consider that when the PS3 is running the code, that's all its doing. Any other OS is going to be running other applications at the same time.
Don't get me wrong, the Cell processor is certainly pulling its weight, but don't discard the GPU - its 42 TFLOPS come from just 708 CPUs, for an average of 0.0593220338 TFLOPs/CPU - two and a half times that of the PS3.

Another question about processors and cores.

I did a search and review, but I'm not clear about one thing. There was one thread where it was mentioned that more cores would allow for more video streams to play in real time on the timeline. I need to get at least two HD video streams with alpha, one audio stream, a background still, and a foreground text overlay to all run at once. Can an iMac with just the i3 or i5 dual processors do that, or do I need to step up to the quad core iMac or the MacPro?

Shane Ross wrote:
I can get by with just one HD stream and one audio stream. So for that, will any of the processors in an iMac do?
HD stream. WHAT FORMAT of HD? DVCPRO HD...HDV...PRORES...yes. UNCOMPRESSED HD...no. And again, the amount of streams isn't related to processors...it is related to HARD DRIVE speed.
For the intermediate video with alpha, what is the best HD format to use that has no compression?
NO compression? Well, the only NO COMPRESSION alpha codecs there are is ANIMATION...and that isn't playable. ProRes 4444 is the one with the Alpha built in. It is compressed, but pretty darn lossless.
Point is, you need a good 4-5 drive eSATA RAID...or better.
Shane
I start with an image sequence out of Lightwave 3D. I currently use PNG images with alpha. Those are then rendered into video clips - one talking, one not. I use those clips over and over again in a single layer on the timeline and match them to the audio. That intermediate project is then rendered out with alpha and used in the final project.
That's why I need an uncompressed/lossless format, because I'm building up the project with a couple of prior renders. Sounds like ProRes 4444 would work unless there is a no-compression format.
How could I use an eSATA when none of the Macs have an eSATA connection?

Question about processor

I'm using a BB8330 with the OS4.5 and trying to use a remote access program. I need to download a module from the program developer and when the download starts I have a message on the BB that says "A Windows Pocket PC 2003 or newer device with an ARM processor is required." Can anyone tell me if the 8330 meets these standards. I couldn't find anything in the specs.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi,
Blackberry is not supported. From the LogmeIn site:
Simulated Mobile Devices
LogMeIn Rescue+Mobile supports any device running Windows Mobile 5 and 6. Simulated devices include:
•  Palm Treo 700 w/wx
•  Palm Treo 750 (GSM version)
•  Palm Treo 800w
•  Moto Q and Moto Q9
•  Samsung BlackJack
•  Samsung BlackJack II
•  HTC S620
•  HTC S640
•  HTC S710
•  HTC S720
•  HTC Touch P3050
•  HTC Touch Diamond
•  HTC Touch Dual
•  HTC Touch P3450
•  HTC Tilt
•  HTC Titan P4000
•  UTStarcom PPC6700
•  Pantech PN8200
Simulations are also available for the following Symbian devices:
•  Nokia E61 and E61i
•  Nokia E50
•  Nokia N72
•  Nokia N73
•  Nokia N90
•  Nokia N93
•  Nokia N95
•  Nokia 6630
•  Motorola Z8
•  Sony Ericsson W960
If you need more info please ask! If not please resolve the thread using the options by the Kudos’ star, Just place the check in the Post that answered your question, Thanks
Click Accept as Solution for posts that have solved your issue(s)!
Be sure to click Like! for those who have helped you.
Install BlackBerry Protect it's a free application designed to help find your lost BlackBerry smartphone, and keep the information on it secure.

Hyper-V: Questions about Virtual Switches

Hello,
This question concerns a computer running Windows 8 Pro.
Using Hyper-V, I have created a virtual machine running Windows XP Pro. (we must use it to run a very old CAD program so that we can access our legacy drawings from years ago)
I am not concerned with Internet access for the virtual machine; I just want it to connect to our LAN.
Anyway, so far, so good; I created an external virtual switch, and it works just fine. However, I have noticed that the virtual switch "takes over" the computer's physical NIC. This is making network access from other computers to
this machine very, very slow. (it has other functions in this office)
So, I tried changing the virtual switch to either Internal or Private. This "released" the physical NIC and greatly sped up access to the physical machine, but now I cannot access the LAN from "inside" the virtual machine.
So, my questions are:
1. How do I access the LAN with a virtual switch that is set to Internal or Private? Is that possible?
2. If not.... if I added a second physical NIC to the computer just for the virtual switch, would that work?
Thanks in advance,
-Kevin

1. How do I access the LAN with a virtual switch that is set to Internal or Private? Is that possible?
Not possible. Internal is local to the hardware. Private is local to the VMs that are being managed only.
2. If not.... if I added a second physical NIC to the computer just for the virtual switch, would that work?
Yes, this is one solution.
The other solution is most likely to tune the driver settings of the physical NIC. Disabling the multiple TCP Task offloading options.
Brian Ehlert
http://ITProctology.blogspot.com
Learn. Apply. Repeat.
Disclaimer: Attempting change is of your own free will.

Question about processor vs RAM in 2011 13 MBP

I am looking at upgrading my older Macbook to a new 13" MBP. I was going to get a 13" Macbook Air until I realized they did not have an ethernet port. I am contemplating between the 2.3 i5 with 8 gig of RAM and the 2.7 i7 with 4 gig. What do you guys think would be a better setup for system performance. I mainly just do normal tasks like web browsing and some programming.
Thanks

Hi There. I just purchased the 2.7 Ghz this past Thursday, with the 4 GB RAM. I am loving it, and have had no performance issues, even when running iTunes, Mail, iChat, Safari and Aperture all at once. I think you'll be more than ok with 4GB based on your usage.
Also, you can easily add more RAM after the purchasing the machine if 4GB turns out to be too little. You can't change the processor though. That being said, that's why I went with the 2.7.

Question about using Switches in different Software Layers

Hi all,
I have the following problem : I have Switch A and Business Function A in Software Layer 1, and Switch B and Business Function B in Software Layer 2(which is higher than Software Layer 1). Is it possible to assign both switches(A and B) to the Business Function B and switch them both on?Or is it possible to set the Business Function A as a prerequisite of the Business Function B?
Thanks,
Sukru

Hi
Please check this link
http://help.sap.com/SAPHELP_NW04S/helpdata/EN/43/b494429d7c0631e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm

Question about processor speed

Ok. I used to have an iBook G4 1.2 Ghz. I am considering getting one off of ebay with a 1.07 Ghz processor...if I had 768 RAM last time and had it with the one i am considering buying, would there big a noticeable difference in speed or performance?

Obviously there will be a difference. I'm only basing my judgement on the fact that I own a 1.33Ghz iBook and having used a 1.42Ghz iBook, the only way I'd probably notice any real speed difference was if I ran them side by side. If you're running with 768Mb of RAM, I think the computer will (in your mind) run [virtually] identically.

Question about processor configure

Dear jmfers,
I learn jmf by copying jmf2 guide's example.
And i'm using j2sdk1.4.2_06
The following is part of my code:
processor.configure();
processor.setContentDescriptor( new ContentDescriptor( ContentDescriptor.RAW ) );
trackControl = processor.getTrackControls();
But each time I run the program, I got the following error.
javax.media.NotConfiguredError: setContentDescriptor cannot be called before configured
at com.sun.media.ProcessEngine.setContentDescriptor(ProcessEngine.java:342)
at com.sun.media.MediaProcessor.setContentDescriptor(MediaProcessor.java:123)
It's said that the processor will block when it's configuring. But it seems that it doesn't work.
Any hints for such errors?
Thanks for reply.

processor.congifure() doesnt block. its syncronous. You should read better the guide ;-)
The solution is create a StateHelper(in apendices) over the processor, try another block system or listen the ConfigureCompleteEvent. There are examples of the 3 in the guide... or you can consult the jmf solutions too.

Question About "The Switch"

I am definitely thinking about purchasing a MacBook, but before I do that, I need to know if I will be able to do the same things with it that I am able to do with my windows machine. The most important thing is word processing, I don't think MacBook comes with Microsoft Word as my computer came with, so what software does it come with. I also use PowerPoint and Excell frequently. I already use iTunes everyday so I know that won't be a problem. I also just bought a new Sony Cybershot and the picture software does not support Mac OS X, so does the MacBook come with some sort of picture software?
Thanks in advance,
Dan

I think you can use any digital camera.Since iLife 06 we don't use manufacturers software.I threw away my Olympus software and I have imported from at least 5 different cameras to my PB without any additional software.I hink it's fully "plug-and-play".You can always test in a friend's Mac though...

Question about App Switcher

Would a contact appear in my app switcher list if I had not called or text them? If so, what reason might that be?

all the contacts in your favorites ( i believe) are listed even if you havent contacted them recently - i assume the ones that only show texts is because you only texted them (or they you) - the ones that show calls and texts should mean they did both

Question about processor switch

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for