Question license splitting in CUCM 6.x

Hi All,
Under the old 4.x model you were able to split the roles of you CCM's without a license penalty.
eg. I have 3 servers licensed but I actualy have 5 servers in the cluster 3 servers running all services except TFTP and IPVMS 2 servers ONLY running TFTP and IPVMS.
This was totaly valid under the license rules for 4.x but now with 6.x there is license enforcement so what I want to know is can I run the same cluster above with only 3 node licenses or will I need to have a full node license for the 2 boxes only doing TFTP and IPVMS?
I am posing this question through my local Cisco guys but thought someone else may have run into it. Any help would be great.
Cheers,
Ben.

AFAIK the CCM node license is only required for the CUCM service. in my lab i have 2 servers, if i shut down the CCM service in the SUB and go to license viewer i get 2 licensed nodes, 1 used and 1 available.
the CCM node license refers to a node in which you will be doing call processing or in which you will have the service running as a backup server.
the TFTP service should not require the license but to be honest i'm not sure if it's required to run IPVMS. according to the test i did in my lab it should not be, since the only service i stopped was the CUCM service and all the others kept running.
HTH

Similar Messages

Question in splitting

I want a solution in splitting the PDF file that contains nearly 1000 pages(contains 24 chapters).
According to the Folio Page number in the PDF I give page number in the Adobe Acrobat Pages Tab.
While splitting the PDF files with 1st level of Bookmark it is not coming with the folio page number as in the full book pdf; the pages comes as total page available in the splitted.
e.g.,
In the full book PDF(1000 pages), second chapter starting from the folio page number 22-50. If I split the files according level 1 bookmark, the second chapter page number comes as 1-29.
Could anybody help me in getting the folio page number in the splitted file, like as full book pdf having.

AFAIK the CCM node license is only required for the CUCM service. in my lab i have 2 servers, if i shut down the CCM service in the SUB and go to license viewer i get 2 licensed nodes, 1 used and 1 available.
the CCM node license refers to a node in which you will be doing call processing or in which you will have the service running as a backup server.
the TFTP service should not require the license but to be honest i'm not sure if it's required to run IPVMS. according to the test i did in my lab it should not be, since the only service i stopped was the CUCM service and all the others kept running.
HTH

License Rehosting for CUCM 8.5 to 9.1.2 Virtualization and Upgrade

No license rehosting is required for a jump upgrade from 6 or 7 to 9.1.2.
If you follow the same procedure for a 8.5 or 8.6 virtualization and upgrade - you virtualize your 8.5 or 8.6 software in a lab and then upgrade to 9.1.2 and cutover - do you need to rehost your licenses for the interim virtual 8.5 or 8.6 cluster before upgrading? I've seen this error:
"Upgrades are prohibited during Licensing Grace Period" error trying to move off the "Software Location" page.

Hi,
The following link provides details of licenses usage by diff endpoints on version 9.x
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/upgrade/uct/9_1_1/CUCM_BK_U0AE00F5_00_uct-admin-guide/CUCM_BK_U0AE00F5_00_uct-admin-guide_chapter_0100.html
HTH
Manish

User License for Cisco CUCM 7.1.3

Hi
I need 30 unit license for Cisco Communication Manager 7.1. But I found that it's already end of sale.
I want the unit license part number for cisco cucm 7.1.3 version.
And i found revised part numbers for user license (CUCM-USR-LIC ) but those for 8,x versions. If i purchase that will it support in CUCM 7.1.3?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
CUCM 7 is already end of sale.
CUCM 7.1.5 supports UCL.If we refer the ordering guide of CUCM 8.5, you can get UCL licenses [Basic/essential].
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/partner/WWChannels/technology/ipc/downloads/UC_8_6_OG.pdf
What I think if u place the order , you should get the licenses and at the backened, it would be DLU.
You can also speak to Cisco SE for further clarity.
regds,
aman

[makepkg] Question about split packages handling in makepkg

Hello
One question came to my mind, while I was looking at the vlc PKGBUILD. Does splitting packages have to be done in such a non efficient way? I mean, why do we have to delete for example, a directory, once make install has been issued, only to copy the removed parts by hand in the next function? Wouldn't it be better to just specify something like per-package %files section (like in RPM .spec files)? Is this approach possible in Arch without ditching all the work up to now? If there was any discussion about that, I would love to take part in it. I am also looking forward to listening some critical comments.

Allan wrote:How is providing a list of files to include more efficient that providing a list not to include?
If it was only about providing a list of files to include/exclude, it would be ok. However, as far as I know, when Makefile has only one install target and we have to separate some files, we have to install all first, and then remove parts which don't fit into the main package just to copy them back in place in the next package-foo2() function. It's like doing the same work twice. Is that right? If so, it could be quite problematic to package bigger projects. I'm kind of speculating here, because I can't name any of the "big projects", but I'm quite sure there are some out there. I hope I made my point clearly now.

Question about split group by in IQ16 SP08.

Dear all,
I have a customer who encountered performance of "union all view".
As per our analysis, IQ optimizer does't split the Group By.
[Query]
select "EDPS_CSN","count"()
from "adwown"."vw_adw_dpy111n_01"
group by "edps_csn"
As far as I know, There are some restrictions on the situations and queries that benefit from the split GROUP BY.
But this view meets all restrictions.
Please refer to the below URL.
[Impact on query performance of GROUP BY over a UNION ALL]
- http://infocenter.sybase.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.sybase.infocenter.dc00169.1520/html/iqperf/iqperf35.htm
So I would like to know the following questions.
1) How to enforce the split the group by.
2) Any changes about split group by in IQ16 SP08?
I failed to attach the query pland becuase it's extension is html.
Any comments or advice will be greatly apprecaited.
** Base Table Rows
    1) ADWOWN.TB_ADW_DPY119N : 23,259
    2) ADWOWN.TB_ADW_DPY111N : 398,017,348
    3) ADWOWN.TB_ADW_DPY117N : 16,160,487
Thanks
Gi-Sung Jang

The big issue is that the GROUP BY is on the view, not on the base tables. At the time of optimization, we don't know always know the data distribution of the GROUP BY key. At least we don't know whether or not each table in the UNION ALL has overlapping data for that column. Consequently, you have to retrieve all data first, sort/order it, then run the group by.
There are caveats to this, as your link provides. But what is missing from your post is the logic of the view. Can you provide that?
Mark

Questions about split ..trying to extract 2 levels of OUs from distinguishedname

Hallo .. I'm still on a voyage of self-discovery to teach myself Powershell. Be kind.
I'd like to extract two levels of OU names from a computer object's distinguished name in AD for a report. I'm getting .distinguishedname from get-adcomputer.
I have this:
CN=COMPUTERNAME,OU=OU2,OU=OU1,OU=NOTWANTED,OU=NOTTHISEITHER,DC=FOO,DC=BAR,DC=COM
...and I'd like to pull out:
OU1
OU2
I'd like each assigned to its own variable. Through messing around I've been able to get a little of what I want using split:
$OU = ($blah.DistinguishedName -split ",*..=")[2,3]
This gives me both OU1 and OU2, but I can't figure out how to separate *that* into two separate values which I can assign to $OU1 & $OU2.
Is split even the right choice, or would a regular expression be the way to go? I confess I don't really understand those yet.
Examples would be welcome.
Thanks much.
LW
Lanwench ** Do not fold, spindle or mutilate. Fill in the box completely and erase any stray marks. Use only a #2 pencil.

Nyuk. That's what you get when the liberal-arts majors go into tech!
Following your logic I figured out how to add $OU3 also. Goody.
Is it permissible to ask one more followup question in here or will I be beaten soundly? I'll risk it...
So, I can now see that although *most* of our servers have a consistent number of 'parent' OUs, some don't. Meaning, it could be one of the following...
CN=COMPUTERNAME,OU=OU3,OU=OU2,OU=OU1,OU=NOTWANTED,OU=NOTTHISEITHER,DC=FOO,DC=BAR,DC=COM
CN=COMPUTERNAME,OU=OU2,OU=OU1,OU=NOTWANTED,OU=NOTTHISEITHER,DC=FOO,DC=BAR,DC=COM
CN=COMPUTERNAME,OU=OU1,OU=NOTWANTED,OU=NOTTHISEITHER,DC=FOO,DC=BAR,DC=COM
...and I want to see *only* the OUs that are under OU=NOTWANTED. Children, I guess.
I tried filtering -
$container3=[adsi]$container2.Parent | | where-object {$_ -notlike "OU=NOTWANTED" }
and that didn't work at all. No error, but I'm seeing NOTWANTED as part of my output.
What is one of the many things I am probably doing wrong?
Lanwench ** Do not fold, spindle or mutilate. Use only a #2 pencil. Fill in the box completely and erase any stray marks.

Question on splitting the invoice

Hi Gurus,
Could you please answer my below query.
is it possible to create a sales order, follow the usual process of DR (Drop Shippment) (PR -> PO -> MIRO) but when it comes to the invoice to split the amount e.g. in 4parts?
If yes, how?
Many Thanks
Ajith
Edited by: Kumar on Dec 12, 2008 10:51 AM

This functionality is available in IS Oil using invoicing cycles and grouping the required condition into respective invoice types. For example; all fee condition types to be grouped in a FEE invoice, all product price related conditions to be grouped in the PRODUCT invoice, and so on. Not sure if the same/ similar functionality is available for standard SD.

Question about splitting string for placeholder in SE91

Hi all,
In SE91, I had a message with placeholder & & & &.
In my program, I will have my message passed into a variable.
I will then split the message into 4 equal portion to be fit to the placeholder.
The problem is, the placeholder will display additional space in between a word if that word is splitted. I can't type a very long example, but I will try to explain using the example below,
My message, V_TEXT is : Hello. Today is Wednesday.
Let's say I split it to
V_TEXT1 = Hello. Toda
V_TEXT2 = y is Wednesday
V_TEXT3 = blank
V_TEXT4 = blank
WHen I display in the system message, the message will become
"Hello Toda y is Wednesday", with a space between Toda & y. How can I solve this? Thanks in advance.

Hi Mil,
Please use &1&2&3&4 in your message instead of & & & &.This will avoid the unnessary space in between.
Regards,
Shobha

CER v9 upgrade questions - licensing - media

I have customer woth dual 7816I5s running CER 8.5.1. He needs an upgrade to pick up support for a couple of new switches whose MIBs are not in 8.5.1. This switch is in 8.7 and 9.0.2.
1) In the downloads section of CCO, there is no ISO for 8.7 - only OVAs. However, there is an ISO for 9.0.2. Has 8.7 been pulled?
2) Will I need to upgrade licenses from v8 to v9? I did not see that addressed in the release notes.
Thanks.

You would get the software from Cisco through the PUT Tool if you have UCSS CUWL. If not, you will need to purchase the software.
You would need to upgrade your license from version 8 to 9.
Regards,
Yosh

Question about (split)

Evening, the code below is supose to read a file, split it at every "|" and then print it. But it split it at every char. so instead of words I get chars.
-class FileHandler-
private static String[] names;
public static String[] getNames(){
      return names;
public static void readAuth(String fileName){
       String aLine;
       File file = new File("data/" + fileName);
       try{
               FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream(file);
               BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(fis));
                        while ((aLine = br.readLine()) != null){
                        names = aLine.split("|");
                       br.close();
     }catch(IOException e){
           e.printStackTrace();
}-class Login.-
public void getAuth(){
     for (int i=0; i < FileHandler.getNames().length; i++){
     System.out.println(FileHandler.getNames());
Or have I misunderstood how split is working?
Greetings Magnus

ProjectMoon wrote:
Good enough. The | character has a special meaning in regex. So, if you want to actually split on the character itself, you need to escape it. Thus, you get "\|". However, that's not a valid escape sequence in Java itself. It is valid for >the regex engine though. So, you wind up with an escaped \, thus getting "\\|".Thank you. And just to make it clear. the same would go for the "&" and "!" then I guess.

CUCM & CME licensing

Hello
I know this may seem a strange question but I am struggling to find an answer to it and am hoping this is the correct place to post the question and get an answer.
Our organisation currently has a CUCM cluster. When new phones are needed the organisation buys the phones and the required number of licenses for the phones.
Each of the 3 remote sites has a 2851 running in SRST mode if it looses contact with the CUCM servers.
I know all the theory about CUCM etc but I am new to administration on a live network. There are a couple of questions which have been asked lately that I am unclear about.
1. There are some plans to add 4 more remote sites to the system, the question has been asked if more phone licenses need to be bought. I have advised that licenses are bought with the phones (depending on the phone model). The phones are new not spares so they need the licenses.
2. If some of the original sites decided to break away from the current set-up and use their 2851 in CME mode will they need to buy more licenses for their phones. I was unclear of the position on this but I did not think it possible to transfer CUCM licenses to CME.
I am sorry if this is rather a basic question but although I have spent a bit of time looking through Cisco documentation on licensing I am still unclear on the answers to these questions.
I would appreciate any help on this or if someone could point me in the direction where I can find the information
Kind Regards

Thank you for the info but I might not have explained myself properly
We dont want to replace CUCM licenses with CME licenses, it is more a case of if one of the remote sites which currently is registered to the CUCM decides to go on their own and use their 2851 gateway as a CME router can the current licenses on the CUCM system be transfered to the CME.
I thought that the CUCM licenses could only be transferred between CUCM systems but I might be wrong
I was also a bit unsure of what type of phone licenses the CME actually needed.
Thanks for your input
Ellen

UCL addon license for CUCM 10.x

Hi,
I'm creating BOQ for CUCM 10.x
I have 500 CUWL users
And I need to add some essential and enhanced users for analog and conference phones
I'm trying to add them using R-UCL-UCM-LIC-K9
But I got the following error which states you should select at least 1000 !!!
A combined total of LIC-UCM-10X-ENHP-B,LIC-CUCM-10X-ENH-B,LIC-CUCM-10X-BAS-B and/or LIC-CUCM-10X-ESS-B should be between 1000 and 10000. Please adjust the quantity.
Is there any other PN for addon license for UCL CUCM 10.x. I think it is the above one
Or it isn't possible to include UCL with CUWL !!
Also from where I could add SWSS service that UCSS will be EOS sale
Thanks

Hi
Just use the 'phones-users' tab in BAT.
... though I generally do phones/users separately.
Aaron

CUCME + CUE port license

Do you need a port license in integrating CUCME and CUE?

Hi Ramon,
Yes you would require Port licenses for this integration (increments of 2)
The following types of licenses are available:
•Mailboxes (available only in increments of five)
•Ports (available only in increments of two)
•IVR (available only in increments of two)
•TimeCardView users (available only in increments of one)
The corresponding SKUs for these licenses are:
•FL-CUE-MBX-5
•FL-CUE-PORT-2
•FL-CUE-IVR-2
•FL-TCV-USER-1
To determine the total quantity of licenses you need, multiply the incremental quantity from the name of the CSL license with the explicit quantity of increments that you want to purchase. For instance, FL-CUE-MBX-5 represents an incremental quantity of five mailboxes. If you select an explicit quantity of four for the FL-CUE-MBX-5 feature, the total quantity will be five times four, or 20.
From this excellent doc;
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity_exp/rel7_1/Licensing/Using_CSL.html#wp1102792
Cheers!
Rob
Please support CSC helps Kiva
https://supportforums.cisco.com/blog/12122171/cisco-support-community-helps-kiva

Licencing issue/question

Hi;
We are currently at vSphere 4.1 U3, (hopefully) upgrading to. V5.1. We are a departmental branch in a large organization.
We have a 8 CPU Enterprise Plus license split on two ESXi Hosts (HP DL580's 4CPU ).
We recently were asked by a sister branch if we wanted their unused, 2 CPU licences. (We have a third DL580 we have wanted to add for some time.)
Of course we said yes, but after the transfer, realized it was Enterprise, not Enterprise Plus.
Also didn't realize(I'm assuming at this point) the licence had to match the CPU count in the Host (?), as we got errors when applying the key.
We're now scrambling to try and get Head Office to upgrade these to Plus, and add two more
to standardize the config, but not sure if they'll spring for it.
a couple of questions. Aside from Distributed Switching (a feature we love), can the two editions co-exist? (We have one vCenter 4.1 server)
Anyone else out there have a mixed bag of stuff?
Any insights into this?
Thanks.
Gregg

The simplest approach would be to detect these conditions in the existing value change listener since you have access to the prior and current values. Otherwise, I have no idea but I suspect you cannot.

Question license splitting in CUCM 6.x

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for