Question: Priority Queue "deleteMin()" trouble

Hello, I am having trouble formulating a delete() method here, which could also be called deleteMin() here.
The priority queue, is suppose to have quick insertion O(1) time, and slow deletion O(N) because it's going to have to search through the unordered array, find the minimum object then delete it once "delete()" is called.
However, I am stuck on trying to come up with the logic for my delete() method....
Here's what I am thinking...
I need to examine all the items and shift half of them, on average, down to fill in the hole once the minimum item is found.
How would I find the minimum item, and once found how would I delete this? Any direction or statements you can show me to clear this up would be appreciated. Please see my code below :) Please excuse my empty javadocs as of right now, I do those last.
Thank you
* This class is to demonstrate.....
* @version 1.0
public class PriorityQ {
     private int maxSize;
     private long[] queArray;
     private int nItems;
      * Javadoc here
     public PriorityQ(int s) // constructor
          maxSize = s;
          queArray = new long[maxSize];
          nItems = 0;
      * Javadoc here
     public void insert(long value) {
          queArray[nItems] = value;
          nItems++;
      * Javadoc here
      public long remove () {
      * Javadoc here
     public long peekMin() {
               return queArray[nItems - 1];
      * Javadoc here
     public boolean isEmpty() {
               return (nItems == 0);
      * Javadoc here
     public boolean isFull() {
               return (nItems == maxSize);
} // end class PriorityQ
class PriorityQApp {
             public static void main(String[] args)
                PriorityQ q1 = new PriorityQ(5);
                q1.insert(30);
                q1.insert(50);
                q1.insert(10);
                q1.insert(40);
                while( !q1.isEmpty() )
                   long item = q1.remove();
                   System.out.print(item + " ");  // 10, 20, 30, 40, 50
                   }  // end while
                System.out.println("");
     } // end main()
} // end class PriorityQApp
// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////Edited by: Cole1988 on Feb 21, 2009 9:03 AM

Sorry no one got to you sooner.
Using your instance variables:
public long remove()
     long minValue = Long.MAX_VALUE;
     int minIndex = 0;
     for(int i = 0; i < nItems; i++) //Here we iterate through all the items to find the smallest one
          if(queArray[i] < minValue) //If this particular value is less than the smallest one found so far,
               minValue = queArray; //This value is now the smallest one found so far
               minIndex = i; //minIndex now contains the index of the smallest one found so far
     /*Now we can remove the smallest term, because after the above iteration, minIndex is the index number of the smallest value and minValue is the smallest value.*/
     for(int i = minIndex + 1; i < nItems; i++) //Starting at the term right AFTER the smallest one
          queArray[i-1]=queArray[i]; //Copy the value into the space right BEFORE it
     nItems--; //The number of items has decreased by one
     return minValue;
}Note: This code does NOT resize your array after you remove an item; depending on how you'll implement it, you'll need to check if you're about to overflow the array by comparing nItems with queArray.length and resize your array accordingly.
It seems like you're a bit confused about loops and iterating through arrays; I'd recommend reviewing a good Java book or online tutorial and practicing with some basic array iterations before you go any farther. You've got the basic grasp of things, it just hasn't "clicked" for you yet. :)
Let me know if you need any more help or if you don't understand anything about what I just said.
Regards,
Alvin                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

Similar Messages

  • Priority Queue Question

    If compareTo returns negative, does that mean that the object it was invoked on is higher or lower priority?
    Also in a priority queue, is it invoked on the inserted object or on the object already in the queue?

    If compareTo returns negative, does that mean that
    the object it was invoked on is higher or lower
    priority? If a.compareTo(b) returns a negative value, that means a is "less than" be by whatever sematics apply for the objects in question.
    Whether it means "higher" or "lower" priority depends on how that class is implemented. If you're implementing it, you can use it whichever way you want. Just make sure it's at least somewhat logical and that you document your decision.
    If it's a third-party or core API class, then look at the API docs and/or source code, or just write a little test program to find out how that particular class interprets negative/positive vis-a-vis "higher"/'lower" priority.
    Also in a priority queue, is it invoked on the
    inserted object or on the object already in the queue?????

  • Here's A Question Using A Priority Queue and a DLL

    Ifm trying to make a method that compares two objects that go into a DLL using a priority Queue. SO in other words lets say i have "5" go ino the DLL and then i have "2" that goes in i need to swap the 2 and the 5. And this goes on for any other objects inserted
         private Comparable minPosition() throws EmptyPriorityQueueException {
         if (size() == 0)
         throw new EmptyPriorityQueueException ("No Elements In The Queue");
         else
    now this is what i got so far....but i know that i have toi make to vaiables and compare them? little help please?
    Thanks

    Um, well im using the adapter class, List. so ive gone a bit further, but im not sure on what to do.....
         private Comparable minPosition() throws EmptyPriorityQueueException {
         if (size() == 0)
         throw new EmptyPriorityQueueException ("No Elements In The Queue");
         while (isEmpty()==false)
         r = ((Comparable)elements.first());
         s = ((Comparable)elements.next(elements));
    then i can make r=s and make s serach for the next element,?
    Can the experienced programmers help me out? Doesn't seem to be a tuff question.

  • Does the priority queue always work?

    Hi 
    I have a 8Mbp of wan link which sometime gets saturated and I have shaped average this to 8Mbps but i am running vocie on this WAN link and have defined priority for voice with 850kbps under voice class. My question is when the link is not fully utilized, Will the packets from priority queue are always dequeued first as compared to packets sent from from other queus or will the QoS will not do anything here since the link utilization is lot less than what is sepecified in shape average. I am asking this to confirm if the priority queue always help to overcome the issue of jitter if either the link is saturated or not?
    Thanks

    Disclaimer
    The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    You describe PQ and shaping, but the former is usually a part of doing QoS on L2/L3 switches, and the latter on routers.  What device(s) and their IOS versions and the WAN media are you working with?
    On "routers", interfaces generally have FIFO tx-rings, only when they overflow, are packets placed in CBWFQ queues.  Within CBWFQ, LLQ will be dequeued first, but such packets might have already been queued behind other non-LLQ traffic within the interface tx-ring.  (NB: for routers, with tx-rings, when supporting VoIP, you may want to minimize the size of the tx-ring.)
    Shapers, in my experience, are "interesting".  First, I believe many shapers don't account for L2 overhead, but provider CIRs often do.  So unless you shape slower than the nomimal CIR rate, you can send faster than the available bandwidth.  (Often I've found shaping 10 to 15% slower allows for average L2 overhead.)
    Second, shapers work on averages over time intervals.  For VoIP, you'll often want to insure the shaper is using a small Tc, otherwise it will allow FIFO bursts.  (I've found a Tc of 10ms seems to support VoIP fairly well.)
    Third, I suspect some shapers might have their own queues between the interface and the defined policy queues.  If they do, unknown what their queuing organization is or their supported queuing depths.  If this is the case, makes it difficult to engineer QoS.
    Whenever possible, I've found it beneficial to work to avoid using shapers especially for timing sensitive traffic, like VoIP.  In your case, I would suggest, if possible, obtaining 10 Mbps of WAN bandwidth and somewhere passing the traffic through a physical 10 Mbps interface, with a QoS policy.
    But to more directly answer your question, PQ (or LQ) will dequeue its packets next compared to other "peer" queues.  This should always help VoIP for delay and jitter, but there's more involved whether this is necessary and/or whether it's helpful enough when necessary.
    You ask about when a link is saturated, but a link is 100% saturated everytime a packet is being transmitted.  Often link usage is represented in percentages of usage of possible maximum transmission rate over some time period, but when it comes to QoS, 100% utilization might be just fine while 1% utilization is not.  Much, much more information, about your situation, might be needed to offer truly constructive recommendations.

  • Low priority and high priority queue

    Hi
    we have high priority and low priority queue's. Functionality wise i know that time critical messages will be sent through high priority queue's and low priority messages will be sent
    through low priority queues. But like to know what technicality makes this separation of
    low priority and high priority queue's ? The crus of the question is what technical setting(s)
    makes the queue as high priority and what technical setting(s) makes the queue as low priority
    queue.
    Thanks
    kumar

    i Michal
    I am talking abt queue prioritization on Integration eninge only.
    I am good with queue prioritization and am able to successfully implement
    the same. We are using only PI7.0.
    My question is what is the technical difference between high priority
    and low priority queues ? what technical setting makes it a high priority
    queue and what technical setting makes a low priority queue ?
    Your answer:
    how the system reacts to new messages if almost all queues are already blocked
    for some types of messages
    My comment: what setting makes the system to behave like that ? what property
    of that queue makes them to behave like that ?
    Thanks
    kumar

  • Priority queue out handling.

    We're testing the reference system shown in the figure below.
    System Description
    Four 2960 switches are used for transport;
    Equipment 1 and Equipment 2 exchange packets for synchronization;
    To reach synchronization  Equipment 1 and 2 must exchange data with a very low jitter.
    2960 Configuration details
    Four our test puprose, we're using 100Mbit/s ports (22 and 23) as trunk.
    In order to obtain minimum jitter We performed these configurations:
    We Enabled QoS;
    We Marked Synchronization packets with CoS 7 and DSCP 63;
    We marked other kind of traffic inserted in different ports) with CoS 0;
    We set "trust DSCP" on trunk ports;
    On the trunk ports we mapped traffic with CoS 7/DSCP 63 (and only this) on output queue 1;
    We enabled the expedite queue (priority-queue out).
    Question
    With these settings we aim at forcing our synchronization packtes to precede other kind of traffic and go from Equipment 1 to Equipment 2 with minimum jitter.
    Unfortunately we experienced  high jitter when both synchronization packets and other traffic are sent through the systems.
    What is wrong in our assumptions or configurations?
    What is the real behaviour of the expedit queue?

    Seems the right config.
    This is the my configuration and it works well:
    #global level
    mls qos srr-queue input priority-queue 2 bandwidth 20
    mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 1 threshold 3  0 1 2 3 4
    mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 2 threshold 3  5 6 7
    mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3  5 6 7
    mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 2 threshold 3  4
    mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 3  2 3
    mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 4 threshold 3  0 1
    mls qos
    #port level
    mls qos trust dscp
    priority-queue out
    What is your IOS version?
    Can you use the 2960 Gigabit port?
    Regards.

  • Wanted: Flexible Priority Queue

    Given this class
    class Foo {
    private int STATE, VAL;
    // STATEs are unique, VALs are not
    I want a collection C of Foo objects that supports these operations
    in at most O(log n) time.
    (1) boolean C.contains(Object o);
    --> Using STATE as the comparator
    (2) Object C.get(Object o);
    --> Return a reference to the collection object that equals o,
    again, using STATE as the comparator
    (3) Object C.minExtract();
    --> Remove and return the object with the minimum VAL.
    If there is a tie, choose arbitrarily.
    Operations (1) and (2) call for something like a TreeMap.
    But operation (3) wants to treat the collection as a priority queue,
    which is often implemented as a heap data structure -- which I don't
    see in the classes that come with java.
    In fact all the SortedSet and SortedMap collections seem to require
    unique keys, whereas operation (3) wants to keep the collection sorted
    by non-unique VALs.
    Question: are there off-the-shelf classes I can use to efficiently do what
    I want, or do I need to design it from scratch?
    thanks,
    roy

    DragonMan,
    I agree I may have to create a class which manages two data structures. The first, perhaps, a HashSet. but:
    The other a sorted List of some kind, ordered by VAL.The problem here is "what kind"? As I noted, all of java's sorted collections seem to require unique keys, but VAL is not unique. I suppose I could create my own red-balck tree or heap or whatever, but I'd like to see how much mileage I can get out of java first.
    Currently, I'm considering combining STATE and VAL to make a unique key (since STATE already is unique) whose order however, is dominated by the VAL component.
    roy

  • Priority Queue Ordering

    In the process of using a Priority Queue the question came up about what order elements with equal priority are removed. The two logical orders would be first in, first out, like the standard queue, or first in, last out, like a stack. However, testing the Priority Queue showed that the elements of equal priority were removed in neither order, and moreover, the elements were stored in a neither consistent nor prioritized order. My question is, what causes this situation, is there any way to predict the order in which equally prioritized elements will be removed, and is there any way to force the Priority Queue into removing elements in a first in, first out order without writing my own?

    In the process of using a Priority Queue the question came up ...I don' t know why.The Javadoc clearly specifies that 'ties are broken arbitrarily'.
    My question is, what causes this situationThe fact that it uses a priority heap algorithm, which is where its O(log(n)) performance comes from.
    is there any way to predict the order in which equally prioritized elements will be removedNo.
    and is there any way to force the Priority Queue into removing elements in a first in, first out order without writing my own?Encode insertion time as a minor key of the priority.

  • Java priority queue

    Java provides PriorityQueue, and I have gone through its API.
    The implementation of PriorityQueue in Java does not provide method for increase or decrease key,
    and there must be a reason for it.
    But, when i go through books on data strucutre, a lot of them talk about the increase/decrease key function
    of the PriorityQueue.
    So I am just wondering, why is it that increase/decrease function not provided in PriorityQueue. I cannot come up with a reason for it, but i think there must be. Does anybody have any thought on this. Or is it just
    because the designers thought its not needed?
    I checked the source for the Priority Queue and the heapify() method was declared private.

    lupansansei wrote:
    I have used Java's priority queue an I have written my own but I have never come accros the terms "increase or decrease key". Do you mean something like 'upheap' or 'downheap' in relation to a 'heap' implementation meaning move an entry to it correct position if the key changes? If so then one should make the 'key' immutable so that the functions are not needed.
    Yes, i mean 'upheap' or 'downheap' by increase or decrease key. Sorry
    maybe my choice of words was not correct.
    I couldn't get what you mean by 'key' immutable. Can you please explain it. If the key cannot change (i.e. it is immutable) then there is no need to ever change the position of an element.
    >
    Correct. Since the PriorityQueue does not need to implemented using a 'heap' there is no need for the heapify() method to be exposed. If one implemented using a balanced tree or a skip list the heapify() method would not be applicable.I am using PriorityQueue and i need to update the priority of the elements and i was wondering whether to implement the whole queue
    myself or look for a better way of using the PriorityQueue class.
    Do you have any suggestions for efficiently updating the priority of element?I have a priority queue implementation where elements know they are in a heap and know where they are in the heap. By doing this I can modify 'keys' and then move a value to it's correct place in the queue in a very short time. The limitations this feature imposes on the elements and the possibility of corrupting the heap means I don't often use this these days. It is far too error prone.
    These days in my simulations I normally remove an element from the queue, process the element and then create new elements and insert them back in the queue. This sometimes takes 2 lots of Log(n) operations where my specialized priority queue just takes Log(n) operations. The code is just so much more maintainable and I accept the hit.

  • Custom  order of priority queue

    I am a novice in Java. I intend to use a priority queue which holds objects. The objects have a string and two integers. I have to order the priority queue based on one of the integer.
    I write syntax according to my understanding please correct me.
    PriorityQueue<Object> pr = new PriorityQueue<Object>();
    comparable(){
    sort(Object.int2)// this is the place where I am confused
    }

    Here's an example:
    public class Caller
        public static void main(String[] args)
            Flight f1 = new Flight( "java", 2, 34 );
            Flight f2 = new Flight( "java", 2, 3 );
            Flight f3 = new Flight( "java", 2, 4 );
            Flight f4 = new Flight( "java", 2, 64 );
            Flight f5 = new Flight( "java", 2, 22 );
            Flight f6 = new Flight( "java", 2, 12 );
            PriorityQueue pq = new PriorityQueue();
            pq.add(f1);
            pq.add(f2);
            pq.add(f3);
            pq.add(f4);
            pq.add(f5);
            pq.add(f6);
            System.out.println(pq.poll());
            System.out.println(pq.poll());
            System.out.println(pq.poll());
            System.out.println(pq.poll());
            System.out.println(pq.poll());
            System.out.println(pq.poll());
    public class Flight implements Comparable
        private String airlinename;
        private int flightnumber;
        private int number;
        public int compareTo(Object o)
            Flight f = (Flight) o;
            return number - f.getNumber();
        public String toString()
            return airlinename + " - " + number;
        public Flight(String airname, int num1, int num2)
            airlinename = airname;
            flightnumber = num1;
            number = num2;
        public String getAirlinename()
            return airlinename;
        public void setAirlinename(String airlinename)
            this.airlinename = airlinename;
        public int getFlightnumber()
            return flightnumber;
        public void setFlightnumber(int flightnumber)
            this.flightnumber = flightnumber;
        public int getNumber()
            return number;
        public void setNumber(int number)
            this.number = number;
    }Got it?

  • Priority Queues

    hi iam a beginner in java, could you please help me with this code. thanks
    Implement (provide complete Java code) a priority queue using a singly linked list. You may call this class LinkedPriorityQueue. The use of classes contained in the Java Collections framework in the above implementing is strictly forbidden.
    You may need to write a second class, PQNode, which defines the nodes in your linked list. Feel free to implement the PQNode class in anyway that you see fit. However, the LinkedPriorityQueue class should implement all methods and constructors

    Here is the search of the forums
    http://search.java.sun.com/search/java/index.jsp?qp=&nh=10&qt=%22singly+linked+list%22&col=javaforums&x=23&y=16
    Here is a google search
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22singly+linked+list%22+java
    Due tomorrow???

  • Priority Queue problem

    Hi Everybody.
    Can anyone tell me in which order elements of priority queue are sorted.
    I have used following code
    class Test{
    PriorityQueue <strings> pq=new PriorityQueue <Strings>();
    pq.add("silpa");
    pq.add("swati");
    pq.add("roopa");
    pq.add("abc");
    System.out.println(pq);
    System.out.println(pq.poll());
    System.out.println(pq.peak());
    The output I got is
    [abc silpa swathi roopa]
    abc
    roopa.
    Can anybody explain why the collection elements are not sorted ?
    I am getting correct output with peek() n poll().According that methods i should get
    [abc roopa silpa swathi ]
    Explain the reason?

    System.out.println(pq);This line prints out the contents of the queue, by implicitly calling pq.toString(), whose behaviour is inherited from AbstractCollection, which therefore has nothing to do with sorting. So you have no valid reason for expecting any particular ordering.

  • [svn] 3539: Updated RadioButtonGroup to account for recent changes to LayoutManager priority queue .

    Revision: 3539
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-10-09 10:58:31 -0700 (Thu, 09 Oct 2008)
    Log Message:
    Updated RadioButtonGroup to account for recent changes to LayoutManager priority queue. The order that a RadioButtonGroup was traversed was always dependent on what order that the radio buttons properties were validated. Since this assumption no longer holds true, we are now very specific about how the group orders the RadioButtons (breadth-first for consistency with Flex 2 and Flex 3).
    Check-in Tests: Pass
    Mustella Tests: (RadioButton, RadioButtonGroup) Pass
    Reviewer: Glenn
    QA: Yes
    Bugs: SDK-17248
    Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17248
    Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/RadioButtonGroup.as

    Revision: 3539
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-10-09 10:58:31 -0700 (Thu, 09 Oct 2008)
    Log Message:
    Updated RadioButtonGroup to account for recent changes to LayoutManager priority queue. The order that a RadioButtonGroup was traversed was always dependent on what order that the radio buttons properties were validated. Since this assumption no longer holds true, we are now very specific about how the group orders the RadioButtons (breadth-first for consistency with Flex 2 and Flex 3).
    Check-in Tests: Pass
    Mustella Tests: (RadioButton, RadioButtonGroup) Pass
    Reviewer: Glenn
    QA: Yes
    Bugs: SDK-17248
    Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17248
    Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/RadioButtonGroup.as

  • Egress queueing - priority-queues and queue-sets

    If I use the priority-queue out command on an interface 3750 does this treat queue1 as the priority queue?
    How can I tell which traffic is sent to each queue by default? Or do I have to specifically define it such as
    mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 1 threshold 3 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
    I really want dscp 40-47 to go priority and the rest to be spread evenly across the other 3 queues as the vast majority of the rest of the traffic will be 0. Is there a command that lets the other 3 queues be best effort?
    Also, is this an OK config to use with priority-queueing? I don't actually want a large amount of bandwidth for the priority traffic, just for it to be expidited.
    Queueset: 2
    Queue : 1 2 3 4
    buffers : 10 30 30 30
    threshold1: 100 200 100 100
    threshold2: 100 200 100 100
    reserved : 50 50 50 50
    maximum : 400 400 400 400
    Any help very gratefully received.
    Thanks, J

    Sorry, just bouncing this to see if anyone around today can help :)

  • Multiple Priority Queues?

    All,
    I have read that one may configure up to 4 priority queues, not using the Modular QOS CLI (e.g. "priority-list" command, etc).
    For the Modular QOS CLI, PQs are implemented using LLQ ("priority" command), and for this one can only specify a single PQ (though multiple classes may be mapped to this single PQ).
    What I would like to do is to have 2 distinct PQs (as should be possible in the non modular cli case) and also use CBWFQ (e.g. "bandwidth" command) for the rest of the clases. Basically I want to have EF in one PQ, another "special" class in the other PQ (lower priority than EF), and AF classes using CBWFQ.
    Does anyone know of a way to combine the 2 methods (modular and non modular CLI) of configuring LLQ in order to implement such a configuration? I was encouraged to see that heirarchical policies are supported but so far I have not found a way to specify multiple PQs as well as CBWFQ.
    Thanks much!

    There has been alot of discussion on this subject. But it seems that while IOS will allow you to configure multiple priority queues, its not really possible for it to deliver multiple priority queues.
    Which, if you think about it makes sense. A priority queue is just that, it takes priority over all other queues. If you configue 2 priority queues, how would you then then tell the scheduler that these are both priority, but the 2nd is less of a priority?
    One way you can accomplish what you're trying to do:
    1. Create a single "priority" queue for your EF traffic
    2. Use "bandwidth" to guarantee bandwidth to your special class.
    3. Put your AF traffic in class-default and let it "fair-queue".
    Something like this:
    policy-map foo
    class EF
    priority 100
    class Special
    bandwith 50
    class class-default
    fair-queue
    -Geoff

Maybe you are looking for

  • PL/SQL VS  JAVA  ????

    hi all iam so afraid if oracle will support java in the future, really i hate object oriented programming like java can anyone tell still PL/SQL Developer,Forms&Report Developer on demonad in the most company? and software houses? plzzz help

  • Migration from MS SQL to Oracle

    We have developed our application with VB.net and MS SQL server (that is also loaded with a big number of stored procedures), the application is also using Web services and xml and other technologies. Currently my issue is, that many of our potential

  • Green "Call" button not working

    When I click on a contact, the "Call mobile" button faded out and I can't make any call.  I downloaded the current verion. 

  • I purchased mountain lion from a friend account

    i purchased mountain lion from a friend account. I will still be able to receive updates and if not,what should i do?

  • I keep getting invalid signature when trying to upgrade to 10.5 from 10.4.1.10

    I've tried to install 10.5 numerous times and keep getting "invalid signature" error even after doing the suggested Apple Software Update 'repair' as well as doing the download and running the install manually. I now have updates piling up on my iPad