Question - Why Lightroom is not releasing memory?
I've posted this question earlier and was wondering if anyone else is having this problem.
After Lightroom is closed everything slows down. I checked the Task Manager Process tab and noticed the LR is still hogging the memory at 80% to 92%. I have to end the task from there. I don't want to do this every time I shutdown the program. Is there a fix?
Thanks
I cannot duplicate this as reported with V1.0 trial on Windows XP.
Memory allocations and CPU use varies with the gestures I make to the number of photos chosen. I see memory go up for each module loaded (hint: if you never use the Print, Slideshow or Web modules, don't click on them; they appear to be loaded upon demand) but it memory is also released. Average CPU seems reasonable for a foreground application.
Now, for larger libraries, I bet Lr has to flush all the journaled changes, close up some big structures and finalize all the library stuff. This could probably take a noticeable amount of time after the GUI has closed. I'd expect this work to be finalized in a short amount of time and the actual process disappear.
I guess with a really large library with a lot of pending changes this might take seconds, but even if it is minutes I'd just let it work (maybe purging previews?). A lot of big apps are designed with the new "defer what you can" paradigm, which means you defer a lot of housekeeping to shutdown to decrease startup time (and, therefore, increase perceived application performance).
Real operating systems will give an app that is the process of shutting down access to the resources it needs to complete without starving other processes.
If this is always a problem you might want to raise this with Adobe. It could be a deadlock somewhere.
Similar Messages
-
PS Touch Android does not release memory when closed.
I have to force closure with Task Manager on my Samsung Note 2 running JB 4.1. Why and when will it be fixed?
Hi Ignacio,
Sorry for the lack of information - I had typed more complete description, but had trouble posting it.
The app is installed on a Samsung Galaxy Note 2 phone that is running Jellybean 4.1.1.
The only way I can see to exit the application is by using the "back" soft key under the screen on the right. Some apps have an "exit" choice under the "menu" soft key, but that key is not active with PSTouch.
I see the same issue with Google Chrome. The menu key is active with this app, but it does not have an "exit" choice.
With both these apps, I have to go to the "Active Apps" tab of the Task Manager to release memory.
There is one difference with PS Touch. Google Chrome always starts the same way whether or not I release it's memory. With PS Touch, if I release memory after closing with the back key, the next time I start it I get an initial royal blue screen with the PS Touch icon in the middle followed by a second screen with a menu in the middle titled "New Project From". If I exit at that point, it takes two presses of the back key to first close the menu and then exit the program and return to a home screen. If I do not release memory, the next time I start PS Touch, it goes directly to the second screen, but without the "New Project From" menu.
I hope this gives you the information you need.
Pete -
Garbage Collection not releasing memory properly
Hello, In my web application memory is not releasing properly, after some point of time application throw out of memory error, we are using tomcat5, jdk5, my heap size is half of the RAM.Garbage Collection not releasing memory properly.
sabre150 wrote:
punter wrote:
georgemc wrote:
Yep. Couldn't be a problem with your code, it must be that garbage collection doesn't work and nobody else noticed. Raise a bug with Sun.Are you serious ?You need to replace your sarcasm detector.I have blowed my sarcasm meter and limping in the blindness !!!! :( -
Why I can not release the memory except I run System.exit()
I have an application which runs over night. (more than 8 hours)
after a certain period I stopped the applicatin(but it doesn't exit from JVM) reset all the object and run System.gc().
I am sure ther is not references point to the object.
it seams JVM hold the memory and memory is not released.
Questions:
1. whether JVM will "hold" memory?
2. Is there a method to focerly release memory?
Thanks a lot!
QiQuestions:
1. whether JVM will "hold" memory?I've notice with version 1.4.0 that it starts to release memory when about 90% of the total memory allocated is free of use.
2. Is there a method to focerly release memory?
No.. But you can provide it with a hint by using the System.gc(); -
Free Stmt Handle NOT release Memory allocated inDefineByPos[LongRaw]
My Question is : Why Free Stmt Handle does not release the memory OCI allocated during OCIDefineByPos for data type "Long Raw"
Please notice the Bold Fonts in the dtrace logging. Ptr is the pointer returned by malloc. Size is the memory size allocated.
I use OCI to fetch records, each round I will fetch 1000 records. I found memory increase round by round. So I use dtrace to probe the memory malloc/free. At the end of each round, I will free the handle of SQL Statement. According the documentation, all the sub handles belongs to stmt handle should be free also. But I noticed that memory allocated during DefinebyPos for LongRaw did not get released.
1. The SQL Send to DB each round is the same.
2. I do the "Define" each round. So It's actually a "RE-Define" each round.
The length of Long Raw is 512K. Here's the dtrace result when I call the OCIDefineByPos. There's a 2MB memory allocated, I don't know the reason.
CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME
3 45971 free:entry Ptr=0x247652d0 Size=0 TS=1568035638893113 FreeTime=2008 Jul 20 23:26:09
libc.so.1`free
libclntsh.so.10.1`sktsfFree+0x18
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpummfpg+0xb6
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghfrempty+0x17c
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghgex+0x13c
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghfnd+0x28a
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghalo+0x669
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghgex+0x1e6
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghfnd+0x28a
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghalo+0x669
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghgex+0x1e6
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghfnd+0x28a
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghalo+0x669
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpuhhalo+0x1fd
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpuex_reallocTempBufOnly+0x5f
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpuertb_reallocTempBuf+0x36
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpudefn+0x2d1
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpudfn+0x39e
libclntsh.so.10.1`OCIDefineByPos+0x38
scrubber`_ZN29clsDatabasePhysicalHostOracle6DefineEN7voyager15eBayTypeDefEnumEiPhiPs11EnumCharSet+0x17f
3 45966 malloc:return Ptr=0x252ad100 Size=524356 TS=1568035638916654 AllocTime=2008 Jul 20 23:26:09
libc.so.1`malloc+0x49
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpummapg+0xcc
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghgex+0x1aa
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghfnd+0x28a
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghalo+0x669
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghgex+0x1e6
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghfnd+0x28a
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghalo+0x669
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghgex+0x1e6
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghfnd+0x28a
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghalo+0x669
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpuhhalo+0x1fd
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpuex_reallocTempBufOnly+0x5f
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpuertb_reallocTempBuf+0x36
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpudefn+0x2d1
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpudfn+0x39e
libclntsh.so.10.1`OCIDefineByPos+0x38
scrubber`_ZN29clsDatabasePhysicalHostOracle6DefineEN7voyager15eBayTypeDefEnumEiPhiPs11EnumCharSet+0x17f
scrubber`_ZN18clsDatabaseManager6DefineEN7voyager15eBayTypeDefEnumEiPhiPs+0x13c
scrubber`_ZN17clsDatabaseOracle13DefineLongRawEiPhiPs+0x2f
3 45971 free:entry Ptr=0x2476ab30 Size=0 TS=1568035639035363 FreeTime=2008 Jul 20 23:26:09
libc.so.1`free
libclntsh.so.10.1`sktsfFree+0x18
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpummfpg+0xb6
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghfrempty+0x17c
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghgex+0x13c
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghfnd+0x28a
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghalo+0x669
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghgex+0x1e6
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghfnd+0x28a
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghalo+0x669
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghgex+0x1e6
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghfnd+0x28a
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghalo+0x669
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpuhhalo+0x1fd
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpuertb_reallocTempBuf+0x8f
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpudefn+0x2d1
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpudfn+0x39e
libclntsh.so.10.1`OCIDefineByPos+0x38
scrubber`_ZN29clsDatabasePhysicalHostOracle6DefineEN7voyager15eBayTypeDefEnumEiPhiPs11EnumCharSet+0x17f
scrubber`_ZN18clsDatabaseManager6DefineEN7voyager15eBayTypeDefEnumEiPhiPs+0x13c
3 45966 malloc:return Ptr=0x2532d150 Size=2097220 TS=1568035639040090 AllocTime=2008 Jul 20 23:26:09
libc.so.1`malloc+0x49
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpummapg+0xcc
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghgex+0x1aa
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghfnd+0x28a
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghalo+0x669
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghgex+0x1e6
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghfnd+0x28a
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghalo+0x669
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghgex+0x1e6
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghfnd+0x28a
libclntsh.so.10.1`kghalo+0x669
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpuhhalo+0x1fd
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpuertb_reallocTempBuf+0x8f
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpudefn+0x2d1
libclntsh.so.10.1`kpudfn+0x39e
libclntsh.so.10.1`OCIDefineByPos+0x38
scrubber`_ZN29clsDatabasePhysicalHostOracle6DefineEN7voyager15eBayTypeDefEnumEiPhiPs11EnumCharSet+0x17f
scrubber`_ZN18clsDatabaseManager6DefineEN7voyager15eBayTypeDefEnumEiPhiPs+0x13c
scrubber`_ZN17clsDatabaseOracle13DefineLongRawEiPhiPs+0x2f
scrubber`_ZN5dblib11DbExtractor18DefineLongRawFieldEiPhiPs+0x2bAssumption : You are using OCIHandleFree((dvoid*)DBctx->stmthp,(ub4)OCI_HTYPE_STMT);
There are two scenarios here the LONG Raw mapping and release of memory.
Unlike the other data types LONG Raw memory mapping is different since the data type requires more memory chunks.
45971 free:entry Ptr=0x2476ab30 Size=0 TS=1568035639035363 FreeTime=2008 Jul 20 23:26:09
libc.so.1`free
Since from the above statement it clear that free is called . Hence there may be chance in other area of the code I suspect the memory leak is (Like native storage).
Moreover the standard OS behavior is that it will not release the Heap/Stack until the process is complete even the free() is called by the process. This is for performance on memory management.Having said that it should not increase the memory drastically when not required. -
GC not releasing memory-Out of Memory Excp.
WL5.1,SP8,JDK1.2.2,Unix.
We have our application running on the above mentioned Env.
We have a memory allocation of 1024MB for the heap. We have three instances of
weblogic server running inside a cluster.
The server calls GC[0] regularly. Once the 100% of the memory is used the server
calls GC[1] and releases memory upto 50% to 60%
appx. But this release of memory keeps reducing and at one point of time it is
not able to release any of its memory.
We tried to get some thread dumps by doing kill -3 and that din't help us much.
we see this kind of behaviour in all the three weblogic instances.
Our application was running quiet a long time and we din't experience any problem
of memory issue before this occured.
Is their anything that I can do to see what objects are their inside the JVM.
I don't have any performance tool installed.
Does weblogic console can give some information on the heap used.
Is their any java utility program that i can use to find the inside's of JVM
Thanks
Krish.You can find out why 'locale' tag fails by looking at the
ServletException.getRootCause() (in your error jsp page, if
you have one).
Krish <[email protected]\> wrote:
I had the same problem recently and I have some information prior to the server
going out of memory.
Our application uses JSP for presentation.Prior to the server getting out of memory
we faced a problem in one of our JSP being corrupted. The client never got the
full JSP on the screen. We believe that the JSP was corrupted and the server servert
the corrupted file. Then after investigation we used the "touch" command and touched
the file and then it recompiled and the client was able to view the full page.
This problem of serving corrupted JSP code started the same day the out of memery
problem occured. I would like to know that does this corruption leave some thing
in the memory that never got cleaned up by GC[1].
Following is the exception thrown when the client try to acess the JSP.
javax.servlet.ServletException: runtime failure in custom tag 'locale'
at java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace(Native Method)
at java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace(Compiled Code)
at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Compiled Code)
at java.lang.Exception.<init>(Compiled Code)
at javax.servlet.ServletException.<init>(Compiled Code)
The custom tag locale just transalates the string into the local language with
some attibutes passes. Almost all JSP's use this tag. So i don't think there is
a problem in tag.
All in need to know is that if their is some kind of exception in the JSP compilation
will the objects stay in the memory and never get cleaned up.
Thanks in advance
Krish.
"Mike Reiche" <[email protected]> wrote:
JProbe will provide information about java objects in the JVM heap.
Your application was running for a long time, then all of a sudden it
started
running out of memory? Look closely at the last code change you made.
Mike
"Krish" <[email protected]> wrote:
WL5.1,SP8,JDK1.2.2,Unix.
We have our application running on the above mentioned Env.
We have a memory allocation of 1024MB for the heap. We have three instances
of
weblogic server running inside a cluster.
The server calls GC[0] regularly. Once the 100% of the memory is used
the server
calls GC[1] and releases memory upto 50% to 60%
appx. But this release of memory keeps reducing and at one point oftime
it is
not able to release any of its memory.
We tried to get some thread dumps by doing kill -3 and that din't help
us much.
we see this kind of behaviour in all the three weblogic instances.
Our application was running quiet a long time and we din't experience
any problem
of memory issue before this occured.
Is their anything that I can do to see what objects are their inside
the JVM.
I don't have any performance tool installed.
Does weblogic console can give some information on the heap used.
Is their any java utility program that i can use to find the inside's
of JVM
Thanks
Krish.
Dimitri -
Lightroom 5 "not enough memory" error message
After using Lightroom 5 for several months I started to have the message "not enough memory" during the export action. It started to appear ones in a while, then it became more frequent and now it comes in every single photo exported.
I wonder if it is related to the library size as the only thing that changed in my computer since I started to use Lightroom is that I have increased the amount of pictures.
I run Lightroom out of my hard disk and I store the raw files as well as the modified jpg pictures in an external hard disk. Both have enough space and the core memory size has not changed since the beginning. I try not to run any other program at the same time.
I have seen that there are several discussions on this subject but it goes normally to increasing the size of the memory but it doesn’t explain why at the beginning the export was done very quickly and without problem and why the problem increased with the time (and with the size of the library°
Is there a way to manage the library size?I have found a Work Around without changing or revamping my computer.
As I have noticed that the problem came slowly after several months of using Lightroom I suspected that there was something accumulating in the memory space needed for the program. From the left menu bar where I had all of the imported files, I deleted the folders that I'm not using currently; this action didn't erase the files in the hard drive but deleted them from the program's memory.
I noticed that now the program needs less memory space during normal use (developing) and when I do an export, the peak of memory usage that is needed for the operation does not reach the available memory space. -
CS4 32 Bit Not Releasing Memory
Photoshop CS4 does not seem to release memory until I close the software. As an example I will open a D3x image file and maybe work on 3 layers of the image and at this point Photoshop is using up to 3GB of system memory.
I then take this file flatten it and reduce it down to around 1333px and in Task Manager Photoshop is still using up 3GB of system memory. Only after about 5-10 minutes does it then drop down to 1.5 GB but keep in mind I only have a file that's about 2.4 MB in size open.
Could this be due to the fact that I am running the 32-bit version of CS4 under a 64 bit OS? Any other ideas why Photoshop could be doing this?Chris
I was wondering if you could help me. I have Photoshop CS4 and it works great after a fresh boot but hours later it annoyingly slower. I have to reboot to enjoy it again. Do you have any suggestions? I have Defragged, run spybot and cleared memory and nothing seems to make any difference.I was wondering if it had something to do with Memory and how it used or leadked. Thanks, Steve -
SQL Server not releasing memory
Hello,
I have created one stored procedure, which inserts data into 1 table.
It inserts around 1 million records at a time using XML input.
Problem is with SQL server memory I think. When I run this stored procedure and check the performance in the morning when server is not so busy, it finishes with less than 10 seconds.\
However, if I continuously test this stored procedure multiple times, it gives huge variation in performance.
Also, I call this stored procedure from C# front and there I have made sure that I am disposing Connection object every time.
After few runs, I have to restart my server computer as it doesn't allow me to run any of the query on that server.
So my question is :
What is that which occupies whole server memory?
Is there any thing which I can write in stored procedure to release memory once it is done?
Please assist me on this.
Thank you,
Mittal.Hello,
I have created one stored procedure, which inserts data into 1 table.
It inserts around 1 million records at a time using XML input.
Problem is with SQL server memory I think. When I run this stored procedure and check the performance in the morning when server is not so busy, it finishes with less than 10 seconds.\
However, if I continuously test this stored procedure multiple times, it gives huge variation in performance.
Also, I call this stored procedure from C# front and there I have made sure that I am disposing Connection object every time.
After few runs, I have to restart my server computer as it doesn't allow me to run any of the query on that server.
So my question is :
What is that which occupies whole server memory?
Is there any thing which I can write in stored procedure to release memory once it is done?
Please assist me on this.
Thank you,
Mittal.
>> 1. What is that which occupies whole server memory?
Probably your application or the other application, but this need to be checked and not guess! Your machine execute hundreds if not hundreds of thousands applications on the same time! most of them are services that you do not see any
GUI. The SQL Server itself might execute hundreds if not hundreds of thousands transactions and these might interfere one another (lock tables or rows, use the same resources and so on).
* as a first test you should try to execute the query using a more reliable application like the SSMS. I recommend to try execute the query throw the SSMS several times and check the behavior.
>> 2. Is there any thing which I can write in stored procedure to release memory once it is done?
There are several option to free memory that used by SQL Server, but do you really need it?!? This is probably not the solution for your case. in the best option it will only give you a workaround.
* SQL Server do not use more resources that you let it (configure it). If you are using SQL EXPRESS than you have some limitations regarding the resources (for example memory and CPU and database size...).
Make sure that you configure the SQL Server not to use to much resources, so that other applications like the operating system will have what they need! There is no logic in restart the machine if the only
problem is with specific application (unless you have problems like memory leak which in rare cases can not be treat otherwise)
http://mrbool.com/how-to-clean-up-memory-sql-server/29242
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178067.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
** start monitor the SQL Server resources, locks and waits
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa213039(v=sql.80).aspx
http://www.brentozar.com/sql/locking-and-blocking-in-sql-server/
*** Give us more information instead of stories :-)
Post codes that you use, post DDL+DML and so on.
Ronen Ariely
[Personal Site] [Blog] [Facebook] -
Photoshop does not release memory after closing document.
When I close a large document Photoshop does not release the memory. If I open another document the program is slow and not resposive. If I close out of Photoshop and restart it then load the other document it is quick and responsive again.
A bit late to the party here but this issue is still live and I can't find anything else on the forum similar to it (apologies if there is).
Photoshop does not seem to re-use memory it just keep allocating new right up to the limit before the prog crashes (same applies to Fireworks) so any batch/script processing of more than a handful of files is impossible.
I am Photoshop via Creative Cloud (so I am always updated to your latest release), Windows 7 64k with 8Mb memory and am using Norton Intenet Security 20.3.1.22 which is updated daily. -
Premiere Pro CS5 Mac 10.6.5 not releasing memory
I have a Mac Pro running 10.6.5 Mac OS, 16GB Ram that I just installed today (had 8GB). I opened up a rather large 11 minute PPro project. I rendered it out. Noticed that the Used Memory was getting larger, up to about 10GB where it leveled off for the remainder of the render. After the render was done, the used memory stayed at 10GB. I exited PPro, and it stayed 10GB. Seems like it's not releasing the memory back to available or am I not understanding how either the Mac OS works with regards to memory or perhaps PPro?
Yes, that appears to be the problem. I disconnected my secondary monitor (which does have a different vertical resolution) and the eyedropper appears to function properly.
Okay, so now I know the cause of the issue. However, disconnecting and reconnecting monitors is not an acceptable workflow. Apparently this problem affects quite a few Premiere Pro CS5 Mac users with dual monitors since you referred to it as a know issue with all versions of Mac OS. Do you know if there is an update (not an upgrade) for Premiere Pro CS5 to address this?
Thanks. -
After Effects 2014 not releasing memory
Reposting this issue...
The latest AE does not release RAM on Yosemite. Have installed Memory Freer app which does release it, but this is a little annoying and an issue from an older version I thought was fixed?
We are on Mac Pro 5,1, 32gb RAM.What is the state of the Reduce Cache Size When System Is Low On Memory preference?
See this page for details of that preference:
After Effects CS6 (11.0.2) update -
Weblogic server does not release the memory after shutdown the weblogic server.
A bit late to the party here but this issue is still live and I can't find anything else on the forum similar to it (apologies if there is).
Photoshop does not seem to re-use memory it just keep allocating new right up to the limit before the prog crashes (same applies to Fireworks) so any batch/script processing of more than a handful of files is impossible.
I am Photoshop via Creative Cloud (so I am always updated to your latest release), Windows 7 64k with 8Mb memory and am using Norton Intenet Security 20.3.1.22 which is updated daily. -
Dw.sap processes do not release memory on Suse SL9
Hello,
We have an ecc6 Ehp4 system running on ;
One Central instance ; Hp-ux ia64
6 Linux Dialog Instances ; Linux SUSE SLES9/X86_64 64BIT
More than 30 Gb of physical memory have been assigned to each Linux application servers, but
we are facing memory bottlenecks. after analysys, it turns out that some sap processes dw.sap
do not release the memory.
At the sap level, the DIA or BTC process is not running anymore.
At the OS level the corresponding dw.sap process still uses big chunk of memory
p01adm 10674 2.9 45.4% 20081372 14955448 ? S Oct03 77:58 | \_ dw.sapP01_D01 pf=/sapmnt/P01/profile/P01_D01_aor3p01a1
p01adm 20839 6.4 48.5% 20091644 15992276 ? S Oct04 121:43 | \_ dw.sapP01_D01 pf=/sapmnt/P01/profile/P01_D01_aor3p01a1
p01adm 25379 5.8 47.6% 20085096 15670868 ? S Oct04 106:47 | \_ dw.sapP01_D01 pf=/sapmnt/P01/profile/P01_D01_aor3p01a1
p01adm 29367 6.1 44.7% 20086804 14735952 ? S Oct04 110:44 | \_ dw.sapP01_D01 pf=/sapmnt/P01/profile/P01_D01_aor3p01a1
p01adm 1326 3.8 41.6% 20078600 13703268 ? S Oct04 66:53 | \_ dw.sapP01_D01 pf=/sapmnt/P01/profile/P01_D01_aor3p01a1
p01adm 21643 6.3 42.3% 20087888 13951496 ? S Oct04 98:53 | \_ dw.sapP01_D01
I had a look at SAP note 706071, but it doesn't corespond to our issue, anyone has any idea ?
thank you
Regards
Raoul> * 6 Linux Dialog Instances ; Linux SUSE SLES9/X86_64 64BIT
You're aware that SLES 9 is out of support since August 2011?
Note 936887 - End of maintenance for Linux distributions
> More than 30 Gb of physical memory have been assigned to each Linux application servers, but
> we are facing memory bottlenecks. after analysys, it turns out that some sap processes dw.sap
> do not release the memory.
A SAP system uses shared memory, it's allocated on system start and not released until the system is stopped.
If you run out of memory I would suggest that you check your memory configuration.
> At the sap level, the DIA or BTC process is not running anymore.
> At the OS level the corresponding dw.sap process still uses big chunk of memory
They are attached to the shared memory segment, this is not exlusive memory.
> I had a look at SAP note 706071, but it doesn't corespond to our issue, anyone has any idea ?
Usually it's not a problem if the memory keeps being allocated if the system is properly configured. Shared memory disclaiming is available on Linux but it's not supported on your operating system.
Note 724140 - Extended memory, release for operating system
I would suggest that you first check your memory parameters, execute on an application server as user <sid>adm:
sappfpar pf=/sapmnt/<SID>/profile/<instance_profile> check
and post the output.
Markus -
Why have apple not released and update to fix the wifi problems
I have a ipad mini all was working fine untill apple released the update to OS6 now we are in OS7 and still no fix?
now i have tried ALL off the work rounds that have been postedand they do NOT work.
in order to get the mini to conect to any network it needs to be sat on top of the router this isnt just my router this is all routers im on virgin tryed with BT and Sky and mcdonalds,costa,starbucks ect ect...
I feel ripped off a wifi tablet with no working wifi is crap. A very expensive glass coaster
WHY HAVE YOU NOT FIXED THIS ???????This is a user-to-user forum. Apple doesn't live here (except checking every so often to enforce the TOU). You can rant, rave and vent all you want, won't change a thing and may get you canned.
This is your specific Wi-Fi problem. Most users have had no issues. My two iGadgets have gone from 6.0.1 to 7.0.4 with all the intermediates with no problem. Same for all my colleagues Minis, Maxis and other gadgets. Which leads to...
If you care to provide more specific technical details, we can strive to help you the best we can given our experiences.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Future date not to be allowed in the tabular form
Hi, I have a tabular form with 3 columns.. the first column name is DATE, the user is not allowed to enter a future date or a date greater than the sysdate, so as soon as the date value is entered I have to generate a javascript/dyanamic action that
-
Problem Instaling Microsoft Apps 2.1 5616
Can not install update Microsoft Apps 2.1 5616 and previously used the 2.00 version.I've tried to solve the problem with reinstal Belle Refresh but again it was the same through the Nokia Suite and via OTA Helppppppppp!!!!! Solved! Go to Solution.
-
Could my iMac possibly just have a temporary case of heat stroke?
After working on my iMac off and on all day, I left it up and running when I stepped out of the room briefly and returned to find it had shut down. This particular Mac is networked to a PowerMac G4 and dual core iMac, both of which seem to be working
-
Hi All, I need some help to understand if we can do the following Business Object version : BO XI r2 Sp4 I would like to deploy more than 1 instance of tomcat on the same box. Now both theses instances need to point to the same repository. Is this po
-
Importing Address Groups from Outlook Express 5 (Mac) to OS 10.3 Mail
I've successfully imported all my emails and email folders from Outlook Express (Mac) to Mail. The contacts imported into my Address Book, but not collected into their groups. I need those address groups! Thanks for any pointers you can offer.