Question with multi-mapping 1:n split scenario

Hi
I have a scenario with the following requirement
R3 --> XI --> Multiple files
I used a multi-mapping scenario using message mapping. to get the following output
<ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
<ns0:Message1>
<Transaction> </Transaction>
<Transaction> </Transaction>
</ns0:Message1>
<ns0:Messages>
Each <Transaction> </Transaction> produces a file in runtime. So far so good.
Now, there was a new requirement to introduce a dtd line as the first line in each of the target files created - that looks like follows :
<!DOCTYPE Transaction PUBLIC \"-//XXXXX//DTD BatchReceiptAuthorization//EN\" \"http://dtd.XXXXX.com/dtds/ReceiptAuthorization.dtd\">
How do I go about introducing this header line above the <Transaction> node in each and every target file - that is created by multi-mapping ? This header line is not a part of the target schema and hence cannot be mapped to as an constant element in the target.
Any suggestions/ideas as to how this can be done ?

Hi Gautam
I did use a java mapping , as a second step after the message mapping - so that the dtd line can be introduced as a header for each target message/file written by the muti-mapping in the first step.
In my scenario, I sent the inputstream that is being passed to the Java execute method - to trace and I see that the whole of the xml file - as shown below - which is the output of message mapping ( from the first mapping step ) in sent to the execute method of the java mapping a single call
<ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
<ns0:Message1>
<Transaction> </Transaction>
<Transaction> </Transaction>
</ns0:Message1>
<ns0:Messages>
So, I modified Java mapping program to look for multiple occurences of <Transaction> tag and prefix them with my constant DTD Literal - which is the primary reason , why I had to use Java mappings after the message mapping.
Now, I get an error is XI- SXMB_MONI
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING" />
<SAP:P1>unexpected symbol; expected '<'</', entity refe</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>rence, character data, CDATA section, processing i</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3>0</SAP:P3>
<SAP:P4>113</SAP:P4>
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>The exception occurred (program: CL_XMS_MAIN===================CP, include CL_XMS_MAIN===================CM00A, line: 609)</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Can you help me out here ?

Similar Messages

XI Configuration Design questions with multi-mapping message mapping object

Hello,
I'm having trouble designing a particular scenario for multi-mapping. Currently i'm working with a Vendor create and change. BPM is not being used.
This is what i need:
I need a CREMDM04 to turn into one or multiple ADRMAS/CREMAS IDocs and potentially a CLFMAS IDoc based on the values in the inbound CREMDM04 IDoc.
This is what i currently have:
A CREMDM04 inbound idoc is multi-mapped to a CREMDM03 (1...9999), another CREMDM03 (0...9999), and a CLFMAS01 (0...9999). At a minimum only the first CREMDM03 IDoc will be created and at a maximum all three will be created. The parameters on creating the second CREMDM03 IDoc and the CLFMAS01 IDoc are based on the values in the inbound CREMDM04 IDoc, whereas the first CREMDM03 IDoc will always be created and the values will just be converted/mapped from the inbound CREMDM04 IDoc. This multi-mapping is currently set-up via a graphical message map and works successfully in the test-tab of the mapping object. It has a main message and has sub-messages which are the IDocs. Im mapping the CREMDM04 to a CREMDM03 to then map it through an ABAP-Class and then to an XSL where the CREMDM03 inbound structure is expected to split into ADRMAS and CREMAS Outbound IDocs for Vendor Create/Change in the remote R/3 systems.
After the graphical map we have a necessary ABAP Class call that calls a BAPI to the remote system. This ABAP Class must come after the graphical map since the parameter for the BAPI is based on a converted value from the graphical multi-map.
After the ABAP Class call there is finally an XSL message split the CREMDM IDoc into an ADRMAS and CREMAS IDoc. There need to be two interface mappings (one per ADRMAS and CREMAS) since the ABAP classes and XSLs are specific to the ADRMAS and CREMAS.
The CLFMAS IDoc can go directly to the remote system, but since its within this one multi-map, Im not sure if is possible? Im not sure if it will fail once it tries entering the XSL mapping (this is the standard CREMDM message split offered from SAP).
There are three interface mapping scenarios I can think of, but cannot get to work:
CREMDM04 to ADRMAS02
CREMDM04 to CREMAS03
CREMDM04 to CLFMAS01
Currently I have the Interface Mapping structured as follows: (I cannot get this to activate as it appears it does not work)
Multi-Mapping ==> ABAP Class Call ==> Standard XSL Message Split
How should i design the interface mapping objects and the configuration objects for this scenario?
Any help is appreciated and I definitely will reward points (no need to include it in your response).

Hi,
I suggest you may use multiple steps interface mapping. It's composited with 3 message mappings as step by step.
Mapping 1: One to one mapping. For the output schema, use a composition schema which includes those 3 IDOCs you want.
Mappign 2: ABAP Mapping. I am not sure the ABAP class you mentioned is an ABAP mapping or not. If it does, That's ok. If not,
call that ABAP class in your ABAP mapping and do corresponding change for your message. Return back the same structure as output.
Mapping 3: One to multiple mapping to split the message.
So basically as interface mapping, it's one to multiple mapping. And internally, you have 3 steps to realize the mapping.
And as my experience, for both one to multiple message mapping & multiple steps interface mapping, it works well in my project. And
in ID, you have to configure it via "advance" function in receiver determination or interface determination.
Let me know if any confusion.
Thanks
Nick

Multi mapping and message splitting in BPM

Hi ,
I am working with this scenario ...
/people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
how many message interfaces i have to create .
one outbound , one abstract and two inbound .. is it correct.

Hi
Minimum you need to create three message interfaces i.e. Bpm_In_MI_Abstract, aBpm_Out_MI_Abstract Bpm_Out1_MI_Abstract, because abstract interfaces can be use inbound and outbound as well.
You can also use create implement it by using inbound and outbound message interfaces. In that case you have to use three additional interfaces(1 outbound and 2 inbound).
Regards
Sami
Reward points if helpful.

Problem with multi-mapping

Hello everybody,
we got a problem with multi-mapping.
Source and target message-type are the same:
<xsd:element name="MY_MESSAGE_TYPE">
_<xsd:element name="BUSTRANS">
__<xsd:element name="CHILD_1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
___<xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
____<xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_1_NAME" type="xsd:string">
__<xsd:element name="CHILD_2" maxOccurs="unbounded">
___<xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_2" maxOccurs="unbounded">
____<xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_2_NAME" type="xsd:string">
The requirements are:
<xsd:element name="MY_MESSAGE_TYPE"> should be created as often as <xsd:element name="CHILD_2"..> occurs
a) so we mapped
CHILD_2 -> MY_MESSAGE_TYPE
BUSTRANS -> CopyValue -> BUSTRANS
CHILD_1 -> CopyValue -> CHILD_1
SUB_CHILD_1 -> CopyValue -> SUB_CHILD_1
SUB_CHILD_1_NAME -> CopyValue -> SUB_CHILD_1_NAME
CHILD_2 -> splitByValue(eachValue) -> CHILD_2
The problem is:
If we duplicated
a) SUB_CHILD_1
b) subtree CHILD_2 (so 2 messages will be generated)
for testing, SUB_CHILD_1 only occurs 1 time! But we need it in every target message as often as it occurs in the source message.
For your testing, here is the datatype:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="http://enbw.com/XI/SAPCRMB2B/javamappings_test" targetNamespace="http://mynamespace.com/XI/SAPCRMB2B/javamappings_test">
<xsd:complexType name="MultipleBookingOrderRequest">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="BUSTRANS">
 <xsd:complexType>
 <xsd:sequence>
 <xsd:element name="CHILD_1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:complexType>
 <xsd:sequence>
 <xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:complexType>
 <xsd:sequence>
 <xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_1_NAME" type="xsd:string">
 </xsd:element>
 </xsd:sequence>
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:element>
 </xsd:sequence>
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="CHILD_2" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:complexType>
 <xsd:sequence>
 <xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_2" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:complexType>
 <xsd:sequence>
 <xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_2_NAME" type="xsd:string">
 </xsd:element>
 </xsd:sequence>
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:element>
 </xsd:sequence>
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:element>
 </xsd:sequence>
 </xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:schema>
Regards
Dominic

Mario,
multimapping (split IDOC into several IDocs) is possible with IDocs. We did it!
Did you use IDOC packaging for this?
AFAIK,when you use multimapping that involves different adapters including one J2EE adapter and a IDOC adapter in the inbound side, multi mapping does not work.
Regards,
Bhavesh

Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM

Hi All,
Could anyone pls let me know clearly how message mapping can be done for this weblog
/people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
Thanks,
Ram

Hi,
When you are doing Message mapping after adding the Messaget types for source and target messages. You can click on the "" button in the target message and add one more tab. You can go to Message tab as shown in the 5th image and click "" button to add one more message type. Then do the mapping as usual.
Based on the value of the element(name), the node of input(details)should be directed to one of the two message types
Here in this blog it is done based on the Name.
You need to use IFTHENELSE boolean function and do the mapping.
Thanks,
Prakash

Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM UDFs Error

hi
As per the below blog
Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure
I have just modified the UDFs(1.selectnodeifA 2.selectNodeifB)
1.selectnodeifA
for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
if(Name.equals("A"))
result.addValue(Node);
2.selectNodeifB
for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
if(Name.equals("B"))
result.addValue(Node);
while checking I am getting the following errors
Source code has syntax error:
D:/usr/sap/D10/DVEBMGS01/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Mapdc8fa4d0896011dd907d001cc01cef0d/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_bpm_mm_.java:132: cannot resolve symbol
symbol : variable n
location: class com.sap.xi.tf._bpm_mm_
for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
^
D:/usr/sap/D10/DVEBMGS01/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Mapdc8fa4d0896011dd907d001cc01cef0d/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_bpm_mm_.java:140: cannot resolve symbol symbol : variable n
location: class com.sap.xi.tf._bpm_mm_
for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
^
2 errors
The source code given in the blog is correct ? I thought for loop has not completed
pls help
manian

Hi manian,
I was having a look to Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure blog.
The functions are not the same. I mean, yours and blogs functions.
Each function has two parameters, Name and node. Furtheremore, in the blogs' functions is using arrays and you don't.
So, the right code will be
1.selectnodeifA
for(int i=0;i<=node.length();i++)
if(Name.equals("A"))
result.addValue(Node);
However, if you don't need an advance user defined function as you want to process just one element of the node's queue, you will not need to use for sentence.
Something like:
1.selectnodeifA
// for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
if(Name.equals("A"))
result.addValue(Node);
Hope it is usefull for you.
Carlos

Multi Mapping   for a simple scenario

Hi,
   i have   a scenario    i.e. from the source I'm getting some 10 fields of data..   like bellow..
Data:                      0--- Unbounded
    Company_Code   1-1
    Order_No            1-1
    Material              1-1
    Amount              1-1
but my requirement is.. in the receiver side i have two structures..
1)Receiver1
Data:                      0--- Unbounded
    Company_Code   1-1
    Order_No            1-1
2)Receiver2
Data:                      0--- Unbounded
    Company_Code   1-1
    Material              1-1
    Amount              1-1
if the Company Code is 1000 then   the data wil goes to First Receiver..   and if the Company Code is 2000 then the data will goes to Second Receiver
This is my requirement..
for this. idid IR point of view every thing correctly by using multi mapping.. even if i test the mapping that is working fine..
but in the ID(Integration Directory ) i'm not able to see any Interface mappings . in the Enhanced Interface detremination..    It was displaying No Objects Found.. message..
for that what can i do..   any suggestions.. please..
regards
Jain

Hi jain,
I think you confused with occurance.
For your recurement You created a structure with 0-unbounded in the Source and Receivers.
There is no need of change the Message type and Interface Name Structure occurances.
Just Do like belllow.
1. Mapping:
     select your source structure.
     select your Receiver structures.
     Put the condition for creating Nodes for the Receiver structures.
     There is No need of change occurances.
2.InterFace Mapping:
     Select Your source message Interface.
     Select your Receiver interfaces.
     Have (1 Mapping) 1 source ,2 Receivers.
     There is No need of change occurances.
Now go to Interface Determination.Choose extened.you will get your mapping.
Regards,
Prakasu

Multi Mapping 1:N Split

Hi ,
My scenario is 1: n Split. I have created one intermediate structure (B) and doing splitting due to satisfy all business rules.
A is the source is the Target. (1: N split)
A  B
B C
A and B has the occurrence of 1.
B has the occurrence of 1. C has the occurrence of 0.unbounded.
I have specified the Source and Target interface is A  C.
I got the message type, but I try to give Message mapping for A B & AC, it is not allowing me to give two multimappings in interface mapping.
Please let me know have you found any answers.

Hi Suresh,
Your both mapping structure should have MultiMapping Envelop..because you are using MultiMapping in the interface mapping, i.e 1:1 Mapping with 1:N mapping.
Go thru this SAP Help-
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/4f/ef761a5ecfb1418b79896e10fe4c57/content.htm
Similar Discussion-
Multiple Mapping programs in one Interface mapping
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Moorthy
Message was edited by: Krishna Moorthy P

Need help with multi-mapping

Hello! I need to develop scenario like in blog: /people/narendra.jain/blog/2005/12/30/various-multi-mappings-and-optimizing-their-implementation-in-integration-processes-bpm-in-xi
but I need to have sets of records. For example, I have 9 "Element2" records in original message.
So, I need to have 3 messages, each contains 3 records of "Element2".
How can I do this?

Change the occurance of target message type to 0..unbounded in Messages Tab in mapping for 1:n mapping.
Mapping for Piyush_msg_out_3 target node-
Element2 (source)-> Index(increment 1) -> Divide by Constant (3 in your case) -> Floor -> Split By value(Value chnaged) -> collapse contexts -> Piyush_msg_out_3
Change the occurance of Element2 node as 1..unbounded in target data type.
Mapping for Element2-
Element2 (source)-> Index(increment 1) -> Divide by Constant (3 in your case) -> Floor -> Split By value(Value chnaged) -> Element2(target)
Edited by: nagarjuna _s on Nov 5, 2009 7:41 AM

IDOC in transformation step with multi mapping

Hello,
I have found this posting
Splitting a message into multiple Idocs
and now I am a little bit afraid that our planned process using BPM is not working:
a) XI receives an IDOC
b) XI continues with calling an external system sync.
c) Sync message response and IDOC are used to be merged into one new message M using transformation step (2 messages into 1 new)
d) send message M to receiver
Now I have read (see link) that IDOCs cannot be used in such multimapping steps. Is this true?
Can anybody give some information?
Best regards
Dirk

Hi Michal,
this answer gives hope!
So I think there is a misunderstanding in using the "multimapping" term?
Multimapping in a simple Interfacemapping for 1 sender to n receiver is different from the "multimapping" issue in a transformation step in BPM?
The central assumption in the mentioned blog was:
IDOC cannot be used in multimapping because IDOC adapter runs on ABAP engine.
In BPM transform step we are on Java side and using XML payload! So this will set us apart from the IDOC adapter ABAP engine issue?
That would be nice!
Regards
Dirk

Abap cleint proxy with Multi mapping

Hi folks,
In this senario i am using client proxy to jdbc.
but my client proxy is generating input file
- <n0:MT_xxx_SAP xmlns:n0="http://xxxxx/bbb/HR/002/SAP_to_yyyy" xmlns:prx="urn:sap.com:proxy:RD1::700:2008/01/11">
- <row>
<BUKRS>This is a string 11</BUKRS>
<WERKS>This is a string 12</WERKS>
<BTRTL>This is a string 13</BTRTL>
<NAME1>This is a string 14</NAME1>
<BTEXT>This is a string 15</BTEXT>
</row>
- <row>
<BUKRS>This is a string 16</BUKRS>
<WERKS>This is a string 17</WERKS>
<BTRTL>This is a string 18</BTRTL>
<NAME1>This is a string 19</NAME1>
<BTEXT>This is a string 20</BTEXT>
</row>
</n0:MT_xxx_SAP>
but in message mapping the input xml is excepting as
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
 <ns0:Message1>
 <ns1:MT_xxx_SAP xmlns:ns1="http://xxxx/yyy/HR/002/SAP_to_jjjjj">
 <row>
 <BUKRS>4654</BUKRS>
 <WERKS>321</WERKS>
 <BTRTL>5545</BTRTL>
 <NAME1>khghjg</NAME1>
 <BTEXT>jhdhgdg</BTEXT>
 </row>
 </ns1:MT_xxx_SAP>
 </ns0:Message1>
</ns0:Messages>
how to handle this <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
 <ns0:Message1>
which is autometically generating in message mapping..
Regards
Vijay

Hi,
your msg mapping is not generating target node.........so in your msg mapping, map the target header node to source header node.......msg1 to msg1......then map the target msg type to source row node.............then take SXMB_MONI payload and test your msg mapping to see if target node is getting generated............
Regards,
Rajeev Gupta
Edited by: RAJEEV GUPTA on Feb 9, 2009 2:44 PM

Problem with Mulit Mapping/Message Split

Hi,
I am a newbie to XI trying to set up a file2file scenario with multi-mapping/message splitting without BPM.
System is XI 3.0 SP14
Scenario is:
read an XML-File and multiply it and write 2 XML-files using the File adaptor.
For reference I used "multimapping without BPM".
- setting occurancy of Message types to unbounded in both Message Mapping and Interface Mapping.
- using the RB_Split button
- setting up one business service containing 2 message interfaces and 2 communication channels for output.
Designing and Konfiguring worked fine.
File is read but no file is written.
XML-Moni tells me "Mapping did not create Messages"
I did extensive studies in sap.help, forum and various blogs. Also to verify Messagetypes and Kommunication channels I set up similar file2file scenario without splitting. Nothing really helped.
Any clues?

Hi again,
very efficient method to test XML-source file. - Thanks.
Unfortunately it did not solve my problem.
Again: "Split mapping did not create messages"
Below you can find a part of the trace created when processing this message:
<Trace level="3" type="T">Multi mapping required.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Creating Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_data_duplic_async_.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Load ac6179b0-a92e-11da-be15-e51f0a000472, http://MyTutorial/SHeinz05, -1, com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_data_duplic_async_.class.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_data_duplic_async_.class (http://MyTutorial/SHeinz05, -1) in swcv ac6179b0-a92e-11da-be15-e51f0a000472.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._MM_data_duplic_async_</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Call method execute of the application Java mapping com.sap.xi.tf._MM_data_duplic_async_</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_data_duplic_async_ completed. (executeStep() of com.sap.xi.tf._MM_data_duplic_async_</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Nachrichtentyp 1 Anzahl der Nachrichten 0</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Nachrichtentyp 2 Anzahl der Nachrichten 0</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST">
<Trace level="3" type="T">Persisting message after plsrv call</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Message-Version = 005</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Message version 005</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="3" type="T">Persisting message Status = 014</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Message version 006</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
</SAP:Trace>
Test of MM and IM is always successful.
Any clues?

Multi-Mapping with BPM?

Hi Experts,
Can anyone send me a scenario which contains multi-mapping using BPM (collect pattern)........I searched on SDN but cudn't find any scenario which contains Multi-Mapping BPM scenarios. All the scenarios which r available based on without BPM.............points will given to the approriate replies.
Thanks in Advance
Faisal

Hey
strange you didn't find it,it was the second link when i searched SDN with the string "multimapping BPM"
/people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
Thanx
Aamir

Split Message value in Multi-Mapping

Hello everybody,
I got the following problem with 1:n Mapping
My Source Structure is
<root>
.<element_list> // 1:1
..<element> // 1:unbounded
...<value>
...</value>
..</element>
.</element_list>
</root>
Sample for source structure:
<root>
.<element_list>
..<element>
...<value>WILLIAM
...</value>
..</element>
..<element>
...<value>RICHARD
...</value>
.</element_list>
</root>
I want to split by multi-mapping!
The target structure looks similar as source target structure (just <element_list> is missing)!
So my structure looks in target:
<Messages>
.<Messages1>
..<element>
...<value>
...</value>
..</element>
.<Messages2>
..<element>
...<value>
...</value>
..</element>
For splitting the <value> tag is responsible:
Every RICHARD should be mapped to <Messages1>
Every WILLIAM should be mapped to <Messages2>
--> so I use the if-function (I dont want to use the SORT function!)
But this seems not to work.
Any suggestions?
Regards Mario
null

Hi Vijaya
annotation:
I need different messages!
So in the tab >messages< of massage mapping
Target Message: The message type must occur in row 1 & 2
Like in thread: /people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
Here: First screen shot under >Message Mapping<
Did you do this?
Regards Mario
Message was edited by:
 Mario Müller

Multi Mapping - Receiver IDOC & Mail with BPM

Hi,
Is it possible to use BPM with Multi Mapping for IDOC & Mail receivers sent parallely..
Appreciate your help ..
Thanks,
vasanth.

Hi Michal,
Thanks Michal,
We are using PI 7.1, Our Scope to do File to IDOC & Mail scenario in between we have to do RFC Lookups..
Could you pls guide me thru the steps fo BPM,
1 SA -> OB to AA
2 ID -> OB to AA & AA to Recv
3.RD -> OB to AA & AA to Recv
4.RA -> AA to IB & AA to IB
Correct me if i'm wrong..
Clarification : Is there is any way out to implement this scenario with out BPM.
We already implemented this scenario with 2 MM & 2 OM, Scenario works fine...but we have to use 1 Mapping..
Appreciate your help in advance..
Thanks,
vasanth.

Question with multi-mapping 1:n split scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for