QUESTIONS # 2 TIGER SYSTEM FOR BETTER PERFORMENCE.

Is it true that the tiger system speeds up system by 50%?
i running OSX.
Anyone make the switch and have some feedback.

While your system will be more resposive it will certanly not get you a 50 % better performance on running things (like having twice the plug ins or something).
Cheers

Similar Messages

I need to reinstall my operating system for 10.5 after seeing a file folder and question mark flashing on my start up screen. Can anyone help me with this?

I need to reinstall my operating system for 10.5 after seeing a file folder and question mark flashing on my start up screen. Can anyone help me with this?

Hello,
That means it can find the Hard Drive, or can't find the things needed for booting.
See if DU even sees it.
"Try Disk Utility
1. Insert the Mac OS X Install disc, then restart the computer while holding the C key.
2. When your computer finishes starting up from the disc, choose Disk Utility from the Installer menu at top of the screen. (In Mac OS X 10.4 or later, you must select your language first.)
*Important: Do not click Continue in the first screen of the Installer. If you do, you must restart from the disc again to access Disk Utility.*
3. Click the First Aid tab.
4. Select your Mac OS X volume.
5. Click Repair Disk, (not Repair Permissions). Disk Utility checks and repairs the disk."
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=106214
Then try a Safe Boot, (holding Shift key down at bootup), run Disk Utility in Applications>Utilities, then highlight your drive, click on Repair Permissions, reboot when it completes.
(Safe boot may stay on the gray radian for a long time, let it go, it's trying to repair the Hard Drive.)

Technical platform for Question and answer system

Hello everone!
We are looking for a technology solutions to realize a <b>question and answer module</b>.
Short discription of the functionality we are looking for:
- member can post a question
- this is forwarded to all members via email
- direct answers via email are returned to asker and to the system (--> automatically generate Q&A list)
- system should import/be integrated with distribution list members
I have heard that some requirements will be met by JIVE forums software which comes with NetWeaver 2004s, but I dont know any details (when? where to test?).
Now I wanted to ask if you know a system like this or have experience with question and answer systems and can give us some hints. Would be very nice to hear from you.
Kind regards
Tilman
Business Consulting Knowledge Management

Here's another variant. You're going to have some answers that are the same for multiple questions. Standard text like 'The SYSTEM tablespace'. Now for some questions that is the correct answer and for others it is the incorrect answer.
So now what we have is:
create table questions (q_id number, q_text varchar2(255), primary key (q_id))
create table answers (a_id number, a_text varchar2(255), primary key (a_id))
create table q_a
(q_id number
    , a_id number
    , a_order char(1)
    , correct_yn char(1)
    , primary key (q_id, a_id)
    , check (a_order in ('A', 'B', 'C', 'D'))
    , check ( correct_yn in ('Y', 'N')))
/Obviously we need foreign keys too. You also need a check for uniqueness of the answers' ordering; a recent entry on the Amis blog could help you here. While your at it you need to check that every question has the correct number of putative answers and at least one correct answer.
Cheers, APC

Question to assigning Source System for Activation

We want to assign source system for activation, before business content-InfoObject catalog activation. The steps as follows:
1.On the Data Warehousing Workbench: Business Content view from the menu choose Edit  Source System Assignment.->This step is ok, no question.
2. In the Choose source system by default? dialog box select the checkbox in the column Default assignment in the row containing the source systems you need to load data from.->Now we can see BI system as default call DEGCLNT500 displayed, in my case we only connect one R/3 system call DHHCLNT100 to BI system.
So, the question to that is shoud we select both R/3 source system and BW source system as default or just select R/3 source system as default and dis-select BW source system?
Which one should we choose, both or only R/3 source system?
Pls help, thanks!

Hi hi ni,
If what you are activating it's going to retrieve data only from R/3, then select R/3 and uncheck BW.
You can change this whenever you want, if in the future you need bw, before activating, you can change it.
This doesn't means where is going to get the data from, this is just to look for active (and replicated) datasources to connect to the business content you are activating.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Diego

Installed Beta 8 -- now version 3.6.13 is using settings used for Beta 8 ???? [Duplicate of /questions/774245]

Installed V4 Beta 8 -- now version 3.6.13 is using settings used for Beta 8 ????
I thought you are supposed to be able to run the 2 as different programs with different settings, but this is not the case for me right now.
What am I doing wrong?
I downloaded the new version of 3.6.13 as an upgrade from 3.6.12 which has been used just fine.
I then downloaded and installed Firefox version 4 Beta 8.
When I opened beta 8 I started making some adjustments to put a few thing in there that I really like and started upgrading some of the add-ons that say they were not compatible, etc, etc, etc.....
...got to a place I was fairly happy with ere I was at enough to "Test beta 4' out --- like I thought I was supposed to be able to do ---
went back to open up normal firefox 3.6.13 and --whoa!!-- it has the settings of everything I just has set up for the Beta!!!! aughhhh!!!!!
I really need to know how to get my 3.6.13 settings back to how the were and use Beta 8 as a separate program like it states you can.
Thanks
.

Makes enough sense and I thought it might be a profile issue, but only after the fact, so why does is not say this upfront ...
In the release notes I find this about installation:
-- and exactly what I read:
[[http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/4.0b7/releasenotes/]]
Installing
Please note that installing Firefox 4 Beta will not overwrite your existing installation of Firefox. You won’t lose any of your bookmarks or browsing history, but some of your extensions and other add-ons might not work until updates for them are made available.
nothing more nothing less... nowhere in that installation process does it say, state or imply -- Create a new profile first -- or see xxxxx article about using betas /pre-release, etc...
Well, I could cry about it more, but I guess not too many other people have had this problem, I did search a bit before posting my question , and I consider myself pretty competent about this kind of stuff..
Next task ... ... ... Is there any place a backup is stored in the profile folders that have maybe my 3.6.12 Extensions and Extensions settings????
I know the main folder is located here " %APPDATA%\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\ "
but I am not currently on that particular PC to look at it to see if I can figure it out myself.
So any help will be GREATLY appreciated!!!
I may have a backup created recently with MozBackup 1.4.10, but again I will have to look on that PC when I get back there tomorrow... ... ...
So any help will be GREATLY appreciated!!!
Thanks for your time
...

Question about source system copy for BW

Dear all,
I have a quick question about copying a source system for BW.
We have two clients in the source ERP:
100 Customizing
200 Testing
Our BW is only linked to client 200, so when we now delete client 200 and make a copy from 100 to 200, are we then still able to restore the source system connection so that our extraction will work, or will it fail, as in client 100 I have no BW related (except the cross-client-objects like datasource) information, that can be used for a possible restore of this connection.
What is the procedure in this case?
Thanks,
Andreas

Unfortunately, you will lose your source connection and need to create a new one in R/3. You can use the same source system name in BW, but check the source system connection after the copy (SM59). Also, I would "Restore" the source system (in BW, right-click on Source system in RSA1, and click "Restore") to insure the datasources get replicated from R/3 to BW.
Depending on how much you want your BW and R/3 systems to be in synch, you will need to rebuild all your data providers (cubes/ODS's) from your R/3 system. This means deleting all the data and running the initializations from scratch. At the very least, you will need to rebuild the delta queues.
Curious, if 100 is just for customizing, is there any data in it? Are you just creating a new blank client 200?

HT5312 My email associated with my iCloud ID has been deleted and my birthday is wrong in the system for the security question. Therefore, I can't delete my old iCloud ID in order to have my new ID on my phone.

My email associated with my iCloud ID has been deleted and my birthday is wrong in the system for the security question. Therefore, I can't delete my old iCloud ID in order to have my new ID on my phone. HELP!

If the old ID is yours, and if your current ID was created by editing the details of this old ID (rather than being an entirely new ID), go to https://appleid.apple.com, click Manage my Apple ID and sign in with your current iCloud ID. Click edit next to the primary email account, change it back to your old email address and save the change. Then edit the name of the account to change it back to your old email address. You can now use your current password to turn off Find My iDevice, even though it prompts you for the password for your old account ID. Then save any photo stream photos that you wish to keep to your camera roll. When finished go to Settings>iCloud, tap Delete Account and choose Delete from My iDevice when prompted (your iCloud data will still be in iCloud). Next, go back to https://appleid.apple.com and change your primary email address and iCloud ID name back to the way it was. Now you can go to Settings>iCloud and sign in with your current iCloud ID and password.

Many doubts about your questionable "change for better" new conditions

I Am an early adopter of Revel and a satisfied customer. I upgrade my account some months every year if I have done more than 50 pics I want to save on Revel. When downgrading my pics remain on Revel. Fantastic!
With the new terms I would have to pay for a permanent upgrade as my account raises the 2Gb free that you are offering.
this not a change for better as you say. Not at all.
As an early adopter will I keep the billing rigths and conditions that I signed up when I subscribed the service? I wait for a clear answer as I am thinking about deleting my account.
Your change sound like a trick... now that I have spend lots of time upgrading many Gb you change the conditions. Not wise at all. and the worst is that we don't know what are you planning for the future....

Darderes-
The new model will not change how the premium accounts work, but all free users will be using the new model once the changes take place. We realize this may benefit some users and not others and apologize if it causes you any inconvenience.
Pattie

Best Bit Rate for Better sound

I’m new to the iTunes/iPod thing. A friend told me that he re-sets the bit rate from the default of 128 kpbs to the top of 320 kbps for better quality. [He plays everything off of his computer which is wired to speakers throughout his house and does not travel or drive much so hardly uses his iPod.] I played around a tad with the various rates on the same album and found that a fairly short one used 34.9 MB at 128 kbps, 52.1 MB at 192 kbps, 60.8 MB at 224 kbps and 86.6 MB at 340 kbps. Another friend told me that he noticed a big difference when he played a song off his iPod through his several thousand dollar system if it was imported at 128 kbps. While hard disc space is cheap and I would simply opt for the higher quality setting, the iPods are not so big when one almost triples the file size.
I tried to figure out what the max bit rates in the CDs are so that could guide the max import rate, but I could not and that question may make no sense at all anyway.
What is the max that a human can notice the difference at and what have folks found to be the best balance between sound quality and storage space?
Thanks for your help.
PC Windows XP

Monty, this is really going to be up to your ears to decide. All I can tell you is my experience during the 2+ years of owning an iPod. I initially thought AAC @ 128 was satisfactory. I then started experimenting with various bitrates, but kept the AAC format. I decided that 192 was a discernible improvement over the 128. Not to go into a lot of detail, but I, quite by accident, had one album download at 256 & thought, "Wow, this is unbelievably better sound, even over inexpensive computer speakers." At that point, I started importing everything in AAC @ 256 VBR which I feel is pretty darn close to CD quality sound. I have a 60GB iPod that I'm willing to sacrifice some capacity in order to ensure the best audio quality I can. This is also why I do not buy frequently from the iTunes store as I do not feel the 128 downloads are the best quality. I buy & my own CD's, now, to insure good quality. I will by the occasional song from the store when I do not care to buy the whole CD. Hope this helps!

Burner not working, 8.98 GB free, can this 2003/2004 imac model be cleaned for better use or will I continue to have problems? Do I need to just buy a new one?

burner not working, 8.98 GB free, can this 2003/2004 imac model be cleaned for better use or will I continue to have problems? Do I need to just buy a new one? I remember with a PC being able to defrag.

You could buy an external dvd/cd drive.
Suggest other world computing.
You need to delete some files. Many posters to these forums state that you need much more free space: 5 gig to 10 gig or 10 percent of you hd size.
(0)
Be careful when deleting files. A lot of people have trashed their system when deleting things. Place things in trash. Reboot & run your applications. Empty trash.
Go after large files that you have created & know what they are. Do not delete small files that are in a folder you do not know what the folder is for. Anything that is less than a megabyte is a small file these days.
(1)
Run
OmniDiskSweeper
"The simple, fast way to save disk space"
OmniDiskSweeper is now free!
http://www.omnigroup.com/applications/omnidisksweeper/download/
This will give you a list of files and folders sorted by size. Go after things you know that are big.
(2)
This will save you a gig of space.
Monolingual is a program for removing unnecessary language resources from Mac OS X,in order to reclaim several hundred megabytes of disk space. It requires at least Mac OS X 10.3.9 (Panther) and also works on Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger). It worked for me on 10.4
http://monolingual.sourceforge.net/
A detailed write-up on how to use Monolingual:
http://www.jklstudios.com/misc/monolingual.html
(3)
These pages have some hints on freeing up space:
http://thexlab.com/faqs/freeingspace.html
http://www.macmaps.com/diskfull.html
(4)
Buy an external firewire harddrive.
(5)
Buy a flash card.

Surveillance DVR systems for OS X

I am looking for/at Surveillance Video systems using DVR [digital video recording]. The only systems software for these systems that I can find are PC based. [[[ BOOOO. humbug ]]].
1.) Is anyone aware of an Mac OS X based Software system for managing a Surveillance Video DVR setup of cameras, multiplexers, etc. ??? I would like to use our iMac DVD SE (ca. 2000) running OS X v. 10.4. latest for that.
2.) In lieu of that, can an NEW iMac running OS X v.10.5. latest run both Windows and OS X v.10.5. latest SIMULTANEOUSLY ?? If the answer to that is YES -- then I would run the Surveillance software on the Windows ""partition"" and continue using OS X for our usual activities on its ""partition".
Thanks for the help and pointers.
Samuel

Hi zeegal2012, and a warm welcome to the forums!
Yeah, it can be confusing as to where to find the Post New Topic button on this forum.
The reason it's hard to find that Post New Topic link, is because if there are any categories at the top, you must choose one first, like...
http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=177
But say chose the Using Mac OS X Tiger and you get...
http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=758&start=0
Clicking the Post New Topic link gets you here...
http://discussions.apple.com/post!default.jspa?forumID=758
that even holds crazy ones like iCal that have but one Category... iCal!
http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=166
Looking forward to your question!

What is the Dream System for Photoshop Pros?

If money was not an issue (don't want to be wasteful either) what would be the optimum mac pro system for a photoshop powerUser?...everything, monitors, hard drives, video card, etc.
OSX10.4.8 Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Yes, the X1900 is not on the required list (and why I don't mention it) BUT there could be plans under foot down the road to utilize GPU if Nvidia has its way so that FCP which is cpu-bound, would would join Motion and Aperture in gaining from beefed up next gen graphics and offload some of the workload to video... but not CS3. Still, $250 BTO means a number of people opt for Radeons.
Let's see if I can explain a little better:
Files are worked on in memory (goes without saying) and OS X uses memory above what Adobe CSx takes as cache (memory based scratch). When that "runs out" it uses your scratch disk volume.
Your work file is also on scratch volume because it really cuts time down.
As you work on a file and reach a point where you want an interim point in time to 'freeze' and save a backup, do a Save to a 2nd RAID, separate from your scratch volume, but so that it doesn't take 3 minutes. Later on, even immediately after the save, copy it in the background to more permanent non-RAID drive.
You never really should "lose" anything but what wasn't written to one of the three or more volumes. Scratch drive still has the file, temp files, history states. The "fast save" RAID has copies. And you have your data files saved to non-RAID.
Tiger cache memory means that with 12GB free, you have enough so that a 2GB file or two can be manipulated at RAM speed. Instead of physical volume, memory based file system, aka "RAM Disk" or Virtual Memory System (or MFS).
Lloyd Chambers blog has tips and his own experience working in Photoshop on G5 Quad and Mac Pro. MacGurus has a "Graphics Forum" with tutorial, test benchmark program, and test results. Barefeats is more generally known, and made the observation of results from tests of 8-core v 4-core.
After Effects CS3 roars on 8-core
diglloyd blog: 8-core
Photoshop Acceleration pdf
Mac Pro 2GHz 4GB 10K Raptor 23" Cinema Mac OS X (10.4.9) WD RE RAID Aaxeon FW800 PCIe MDD-G4 APC RS1500 Vista

Questions re: Partitioning HD for OSX & OS9x

I have a Beige G3, MT, 300mhz, rev.1, with an 4GB Ultra SCSI Quantum Viking WSE that is basically a goner now. I bought a Seagate Ultra ATA/100 7200 RPM 160GB hard drive to replace it, and need a little advice about how to partition it. (bought the 160GB before I learned that, as an internal drive, my Beige will only see about 127GB - oh well, live and learn....).
For a while I need to continue to use OS9 for quite a few Apps & external devices. Also, I do a lot of graphic & web work so there's a lot of revising of files going on on my machine.
After browsing through the posts here, I still have some questions:
Q. Since my computer will only be seeing 127GBs out of 160, what happens to the rest of the "unseen" 33GBs? If, for instance, I format this drive today and then get a controller card or move it to a FW case later, what happens with the previously "unseen" GBs? Do they just get added on to the last partition? Will I have to reformat the whole drive again?
Q. Is it a good or bad idea to put the OS9 Classic system folder on a separate partition from OSX? What would be the pros or cons with this? (I plan on mostly using the regular OS9x on a separate partition for a lot of my Apps and such to avoid the conflicts with Classic that I've heard about, and until I get all my software & devices upgraded to OSX).
Q. I read some posts where some people don't think partitioning is a good idea, but since it looks like I'm going to have to do it anyway in order to install Tiger, I figured I would probably go ahead and partition the rest of the drive The list below might look like over-kill, but from what I've read, this type of set-up seems to minimize and confine disk fragmentation & corruption which seems to me to be a plus - any cons to this?
Q. Also, does this order of partitioning seem ok? (I came up with this configuration after reading some info at these sites: http://www.sciencequest.org/support/computers/mac/topics/partitioning.html and http://www.themacintoshguy.com/mactips/archive/tip11.shtml
Partition 1: 7.95GB - OSX (Tiger)
Partition 2: 10GB - Scratch Disk (for Photoshop scratch disk, scanner captures, burning CDs, downloading, browser cache, etc. - in essence, no files reside here).
Partition 3: 5GB - OS9x (original)
Partition 4: 5GB - OS9x Classic
Partition 5: 10GB - Temp/Work area (Unlike the "Scratch" partition, files/projects may reside until completed)
Partition 6: 50GB - Docs & Resource Library
Partition 7: 5GB - Email
Partition 8: 20GB - Apps
Partition 9: 7.95GB - Emergency OSX system, & OSX repair utilities (Disk Warrior, & Drive Genius).
Partition 10: 5GB - Emergency OS9 system, & OS9 repair utilities, (DW & Norton).
All recommendations, opinions and tips are greatly appreciated.
~Kathleen
Beige G3, MT, 300mhz, rev.1, model #M6572LLA,Ultra SCSI Quantum Viking 4.5 WSE Mac OS 9.2.x RAM=640MB, Apple53C875 SCSI Card, USB card, FW card, ATI mach64_3DU Display card

Kathleen:
The tech forum in the ExPostFacto site (http://forum.macsales.com/) has a number of extensive discussions about partitioning and recommendations. I suggest you look there for additional discussion by people with far more expertise than me.
I do remember a couple of points from my reading in that forum.
1) If things go awry in an attempted EPF installation, under certain conditions it can alter or cause problems in the System 9 being used at the time. Having a separate partition for a duolicate System 9 for EPF to use would protect your regular working system in the event of such a mishap.
I believe one recommendation indicated you could just drag and drop your existing System 9 from your internal drive onto a new partition, even on an external drive, in order to create such a separate System for EPF use.
2) You may wish to have a separate System 9 partition for use as a helper disk for EPF to use.
3) You may wish to have a separate System 9 partition to use for System X to designate as a classic environment.
4) You may wish other partitions for applications, data/documents, etc.
As I recall, most of the detailed recommendations (I believe I saw at least 3 different such messages during my travels at that site) included a first partition of >8GB for System X, two other separate partitions (several GB) for System 9, one for desigantion as classic mode under System X, the other for use by EPF in installing and also (if necessary) as a helper disk.
If I have recapitulated this information incorrectly I trust others will set you straight. In any event, I recommend you take a close look at the EPF tech forums - a search for partitioning should yield rapid results of very helpful information. Hope this helps - Good luck!
G3 Beige mini tower Mac OS 9.1.x Sonnet G4 800MHz upgrade; 640 MB RAM

RFC: a new init system for Arch

hi guys, i've been thinking about this for a while, especially since after seeing what a real optimized init system can do for a distro (ala Annvix). Recently, somebody also suggested the use of upstart (http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … 59#p238859), and i've been thinking that perhaps it's time to put forth this suggestion to the community, and get the devs in on this (discussion) as well.
What do u guys think of replacing and moving from the current BSD-init style (it's great, but there's more stuff out there!!!) to a better, "totally optimized", "rad" (excuse the slang, also known as "awesome") init system?
Here are my thoughts for the 2 that i've investigated...
1. Upstart (http://upstart.ubuntu.com/index.html)
Advantages:
- active, maintained code
- the idea of "events" is natural, intuitive, and as a model, fits the real world situation ("optimizing for the bootup process") very nicely
(although one could also argue that u could just as well call your events "dependencies" ala initng, if u dig deeper, u'll see that it's more than just that)
Disadvantages:
- looks set to become much more than just a simple 'init' replacement (see for eg., http://upstart.ubuntu.com/wiki/ComplexEventConfig [via https://launchpad.net/upstart from "Latest proposed features" section]), and violate the KISS principle of Arch??? (or is this still considered "simple enough"???):
-> looks set to replace cron, atd, and anacron, .... (http://upstart.ubuntu.com/faq.html#replace-cron)
-> looks set to almost (or could potentially become) a "total event system for Linux" (see the last 3 questions of the faq)
2. Runit (http://smarden.org/runit/)
Advantages:
- fits the KISS idea most definitely
- can be integrated very nicely with its 'supervise-like' replacements to help supervise ur services
- if u're a djb fan, u'll find urself going "woohoo!!!" You'll get the very same advantages that u get with djb's supervise system...
Disadvantages:
- if u're not a djb fan, u'll find urself going ....
Your comments and ideas, folks?

I don't see how complexity gonna improve on that.
It won't. In fact it'll actually make it slower, more than likely. People refuse to understand this.
If ask me, being able to just list your daemons in any order and have them work (and load in the proper order as quickly as possible) without having to look-up what each damon might possibly require (and keep track of changes in those requirements with new versions) follows KISS a lot more than having to deal with it all to order your daemons list (and lossing the option to background daemons that are required for other ones).
Perhaps you don't understand the shade of meaning that Arch uses when it says "Simple". Simple does NOT mean that something is "easy", it means it isn't complicated and over-complex. Ever heard of DOS's autoexec.bat? It was a stinkin' batch file and it ran everything you typed into it in the order you typed into it. The reason why I mention this is not because I want to adopt DOS's init system, but instead because I wanted to show you the pinnacle of simplicity. Was it easy to use? Most of the time. But DOS also had issues of TSR's and services, etc. that depend on other services. I'd like for you to point out a simpler system than autoexec.bat that is actually in mainstream use. See? Simple does NOT equal easy.
However, I'd like to mention what my Jr. High principal always told us: "Anything is easy if you know how to do it." I actually find Arch's init system to be the EASIEST system out there. I know EXACTLY what it is doing at all times. I tried to grok Ubuntu's system and I found myself having to read a bunch of stuff from different sources to make sense of it. Is that easy? No. Not for me. Simple IS easy if you throw out your Windows conditioning that everything should be done for you and that you can't think for yourself. You say we should be able to make a list of services and they should all start in the order Arch thinks they should. I on the other hand say that if I want x to start before y, then x BETTER start before y. You see, I'M the user. I'm not just there to share the experience. My computer is a tool and I want it to do exactly what I say.
Hell, I bet you spent more time writing this post than a new init system will save you in your lifetime. The Linux kernel takes longer to start on my machine than anything else (and I'm connected via WiFi on a buggy and slow as hell driver and through DHCP on top of that). I already said one thing that may give you a little boost, which is caching (which may actually slow you down due to overhead). You can also try suspending to disk (aka hibernating) instead of just shutting down.
What do u guys think of replacing and moving from the current BSD-init style (it's great, but there's more stuff out there!!!) to a better, "totally optimized", "rad" (excuse the slang, also known as "awesome") init system?
Explain to me everything you know about the BSD init style. I'm curious.
Last edited by deficite (2007-04-05 02:51:51)

Some questions regarding ESB system.

Hi all,
I've used my ESB system for a few months now, so I thought it would be interesting to look at what's going on in my database schema created by my esb system (oraesb). This led to some questions (and raising eyebrows), I hope some of you soa-experts might have an answer.
* Is my system installed properly:
I noticed that the oraesb schema created by running IRCA.zip installs only tables, views, topic queues and 1 procedure (create_queue). However, looking at the sql scripts in ${soaSuite_home}/integration/esb/sql/oracle there are far more stored procedures defined. Is it normal cq. okay that these objects are not installed or is my esb system faulty?
* No constraints or indices:
My system is yet very small, so it is still performing good/fast. I imagine that when the esb system is going further, performance and locking becomes an issue due to lack of indices on foreign key columns and primary/foreign constraints.
* Only small part of schema used:
When browsing through the tables of the oraesb user I notice that only a few tables are filled with data. For example all "Slide Tables" (this is the name given to these group tables in file ${soaSuite_home}/integration/esb/sql/oracle/wfeventc.sql) are empty. Is this normal? What kind of processes should enter data in these tables? What is the use of the "Slide tables"?
* AQ-tables not being used:
My esb system has five aq-queue tables (esb topics), but they are never used! I recall another thread on this forum about these queue tables growing enormous in size. I guess there must be a sort of switch somewhere to switch between jms-queue's and aq-queue's? Can anyone please explain how switch on the aq-queue's or point me to the proper documentation. I must have overlooked this in the documentation.
Kind regards,
Happy new year,
H

When your podcast is accepted you should receive an email telling you this and giving the URL for its page in the iTunes Store. The string of numbers at the end is the ID number.
It usually takes somewhat longer for a new podcast to appear in the search results. Once you can find it by searching on the title, you can get the Store page URL, if you still don't know it, by control-clicking on the podcast image (or where it should be) and choosing 'Copy Podcast URL'.
You may find this page helpful in giving you basic information about podcasting:
http://www.wilmut.org.uk/pc

QUESTIONS # 2 TIGER SYSTEM FOR BETTER PERFORMENCE.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for