Questions regarding vendor evaluation

Hello,
We are currently trying to use the vendor evaluation functionnalities in MM.
Do you know if it is possible to get the evaluation details ?
For example, for quantity reliability, we would like to have a report giving the PO where the delivered quantity is different from the PO quantity.
Thanks,
Regards,
PYR

Check this Link
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

Similar Messages

  • Some question regarding time evaluation

    Hello,
    I have two questions regarding time evaluation:
    1. Is it possible (if yes, how) to still include a employee in time evaluation even if this employee is inactive (status P0000-STAT2 = 0). We need this in order to calculate weeks of not working (this has to be calculated). I know that for payroll this is possible wih a setting in infotype 0003.
    2. Is it possible (and how) to read data back from payroll into time. For example in payroll you export something to ZL table, can you then pick this up in time evaluation schema, as there is also ZL table. Or is there another way to do this?
    Thanks for you answers,
    Liesbeth

    hi Schrage
    Why you want to evaluate the time for inactive person.
    If you want you can do.
    Process :
    First of all you have to group your employees. and sub groups.( for inactive emp)
    Assign the employee sub group grouping for PCR in Basic Pay ( IMG ).
    Then come to Time Evaluation Schema. Put the Day grouping nn nn nn nn in the Parameters. and run the time evaluation. You will get the output in DZL table.
    For the above process you need to configure the T510S table.
    Yes you can read the payroll into time.
    the same concept will run in both of the modules.
    the output should appear in the ZL table only.
    Here the concept is.....Some companies, they will not use the payroll wage types. only they will use the time wage types.. these wage types has to be configure in the T510S. and we have to do the wage type copying from the part of time management only if they are not using the payroll. So either in Payroll or in Time management the evaluation of time willbe the same.
    Cheers
    Vijai

  • Regarding vendor evaluation

    Hello Gurus,
    Can any one tell me about the vendor evaluation.
    What is the transaction code for vendor evaluation?
    Reg/ Shankar G

    Hi shankar,
    please go through this: step by step guide
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
    Please check whether you concidered all these points in your configuration
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/b97dda414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/b97f3e414511d188fc0000e8322f96/content.htm
    Regards,
    Hareesha

  • Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score

    Dear Friends,
    I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
    Regards,
    Saurav

    Dear Friend,
    Kindly go through the below documents,
    Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

  • Vendor Evaluation - Fully Automatic

    Hi all,
    Could you please answer two queries in Vendor Evaluation.
    1. What is use and where we assign scope of list in vendor evaluation
    2. I want to take evaluation from Invoice also. Configurations I have done but system is not calculating the score on base of invoice verification.
    Regards

    Hi
    for your first question:
    The Vendor Evaluation component helps you select sources of supply and facilitates the continual monitoring of existing supply relationships. It provides you with accurate information on prices, and terms of payment and delivery. By evaluating vendors, you can improve your enterprise's competitiveness.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b97c2d414511d188fc0000e8322f96/content.htm
    for your second question
    please re check your setting..
    very imp vendor evalution
    these links will help you.
    thanks..

  • Vendor Evaluation-Effective price

    Hii everyone;
    I got a question about vendor evaluation. How do we calculate effective price (automatic level) & which screen do we use in this process ?

    HI 
    BY  COMPARING  QUOTATIONS  FROM  VENDORS   WE  CAN  ABLE  TO  KNOW  WHICH  ONE  IS   EFFECTIVE   PRICE
    USING  T CODE  ME49
    OK
    KISHORE  REDDY

  • Questions regarding creation of vendor in different purchase organisation

    Hi abap gurus .
    i have few questions regarding data transfers .
    1) while creating vendor , vendor is specific to company code and vendor can be present in different purchasing organisations within the same company code if the purchasing organisation is present at plant level .my client has vendor in different purchasing org. how the handle the above situatuion .
    2) i had few error records while uploading MM01 , how to download error records , i was using lsmw with predefined programmes .
    3) For few applications there are no predefined programmes , no i will have to chose either predefined BAPI or IDOCS . which is better to go with . i found that BAPI and IDOCS have same predefined structures , so what is the difference between both of them  .

    Hi,
    1. Create a BDC program with Pur orgn as a Parameter on the selection screen
        so run the same BDC program for different Put organisations so that the vendors
        are created in different Pur orgns.
    2. Check the Action Log in LSMW and see
    3.see the doc
    BAPI - BAPIs (Business Application Programming Interfaces) are the standard SAP interfaces. They play an important role in the technical integration and in the exchange of business data between SAP components, and between SAP and non-SAP components. BAPIs enable you to integrate these components and are therefore an important part of developing integration scenarios where multiple components are connected to each other, either on a local network or on the Internet.
    BAPIs allow integration at the business level, not the technical level. This provides for greater stability of the linkage and independence from the underlying communication technology.
    LSMW- No ABAP effort are required for the SAP data migration. However, effort are required to map the data into the structure according to the pre-determined format as specified by the pre-written ABAP upload program of the LSMW.
    The Legacy System Migration Workbench (LSMW) is a tool recommended by SAP that you can use to transfer data once only or periodically from legacy systems into an R/3 System.
    More and more medium-sized firms are implementing SAP solutions, and many of them have their legacy data in desktop programs. In this case, the data is exported in a format that can be read by PC spreadsheet systems. As a result, the data transfer is mere child's play: Simply enter the field names in the first line of the table, and the LSM Workbench's import routine automatically generates the input file for your conversion program.
    The LSM Workbench lets you check the data for migration against the current settings of your customizing. The check is performed after the data migration, but before the update in your database.
    So although it was designed for uploading of legacy data it is not restricted to this use.
    We use it for mass changes, i.e. uploading new/replacement data and it is great, but there are limits on its functionality, depending on the complexity of the transaction you are trying to replicate.
    The SAP transaction code is 'LSMW' for SAP version 4.6x.
    Check your procedure using this Links.
    BAPI with LSMW
    http://esnips.com/doc/ef04c89f-f3a2-473c-beee-6db5bb3dbb0e/LSMW-with-BAPI
    For document on using BAPI with LSMW, I suggest you to visit:
    http://www.****************/Tutorials/LSMW/BAPIinLSMW/BL1.htm
    http://esnips.com/doc/1cd73c19-4263-42a4-9d6f-ac5487b0ebcb/LSMW-with-Idocs.ppt
    http://esnips.com/doc/ef04c89f-f3a2-473c-beee-6db5bb3dbb0e/LSMW-with-BAPI.ppt
    <b>Reward points for useful Answers</b>
    Regards
    Anji

  • Tables for vendor evaluation data

    Hai,
        I want to know the tables in which vendor evaluation data is being stored, and I need to get vendor evaluation data through my RFC, can u suggest me the procedure how I need to do it.
                                 Thank you
                                  Regards
                                    Srinivas

    Dear,
    You ask a whole Vendor evaluation concept you need to read the help and do customizing depend on the requirement, then you evaluate the vendor using ME61 or ME6G.Almost all of your question need customizing setup first
    below is the guide book :
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf

  • Does Cremas Idoc supoprt Vendor Evaluation

    Hello,
    My requirement is such that, whenever a Vendor Evaluation i done,
    The report ME6F, the same needs to be sent to a Non-SAP system through IDoc or Proxies.
    We have PI as the middleware.
    so is there any specfic Idoc for vendor Evaluation or does Cremas Idoc have provision for the same.
    Or are there any BAPI available that can be used in ABAP Proxies.
    Regards,
    Abhishek

    Hello,
    My question is, as you mentioned that CREMAS support Vendor Evaluation.
    I am asking which is the segment, which has the relevant fields or vendor evaluation.
    Regards,
    Abhishek

  • Vendor evaluation - General Service and support

    Hi
    What are the subcriteria that can be under General Service and support?
    How the scores are calculated for this?\
    If manual where can we enter the scores for these?
    Regards
    Soumen

    Hi,
    Following are the answers for your questions.
    What are the subcriteria that can be under General Service and support?
    Ans: - Subcriteria can be defined by us as per our requirement but SAP has provided following 2 Subcriteria;
    - Quality of service
    - Service timeliness
    How the scores are calculated for this?
    Ans: - For above 2 subcriteria, you can assign a scoring method as following;
    C Determination from quality rating of service
    D Determination from timeliness rating of service
    Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Criteria > Here maintain subcriteria for Service criteria and assign the scoring method
    At the time of processing Service Entry Sheet, under "Vendor evaln" Tab, you will have option to enter scores for the following subcriteria
    - Quality of service
    - Service timeliness
    Once you enter scores here, it will get calculated in ME61, if automatic evaluation is configured for above 2 subcriteras
    Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation > Here for Service criteria and it's subcriteria do not activate manual maintenance indicator
    If manual where can we enter the scores for these?
    Ans: - And if you want to maintain values manually for Service criteria and subcriteria then activate the manual maintenance indicator in above config path and then maintain it duirng ME61 (Vendor Evaluation)

  • ME6G - Vendor Evaluation in Background

    Dear Gurus,
    Can explain me this transcation ME6G - Vendor Evaluation in Background . How to execute this by steps?
    Please advice me
    THanks
    Rs

    Dear,
    You can evaluate your vendors on a regular basis by means of background processing. The Evaluation in the Background function can be found in the Purchasing menu.
    If you want to start a background processing request for vendor evaluation, you need a variant (to limit the number of vendors to be evaluated, for example).
    Maintaining and Displaying Variants
    When you invoke the Evaluation in the Background function, you can display existing variants in editing mode of the step list, and create new variants or change existing ones.
    To do so, choose Edit Steps and then
    Goto Variant (to display), or
    Goto Variant maintenance (to create)
    Procedure
    Choose Master data - Vendor evaluation.- Follow-on functions - Evaluation in the background.
    On the initial screen, enter a job name and the name of the variant. Specify when the background evaluation should take place and how often it should be repeated.
    Save the background processing request.
    You require certain authorizations in order to carry out evaluations in the background and define new variants. If you have any queries in this connection, please consult your system administrator.
    If you require more detailed information about working with background processing requests, please refer to the documentation Getting Started with R/3.
    Subsequent Maintenance of Background Evaluations
    In background processing, you usually evaluate vendors belonging to the same group (that is, vendors who have the same weighting key). However, it is possible that you have selected an interval that contains different groups of vendors. For this reason, you have not entered a weighting key.
    To ensure that the scores are calculated correctly, you must therefore subsequently maintain the weighting key for such evaluation records at certain intervals of time.
    The evaluation records in question can be determined using the analysis report Vendors Without Weighting Keys.
    This function can be found in the purchasing menu under Master data - Vendor Evaluation - Follow-on functions - Vendors without weighting key
    From this report you can branch directly into the screens for maintaining evaluations.
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • Reg:Vendor Evaluation

    Hello Experts,
    I have small doubt in vendor evaluation; we are not purchased any material from vendor “X”. But when I run the evaluation transaction (ME61 and ME63) it will give the some score. My question is why it is giving score? It should be a 0.
    Kindly any one suggest me why it is happening.
    Reg/ Shankar

    Hi Shankar
    Manual scores can be given even when you did not purchase any material.
    This means you have given manual scores. The final score 46 is calculated based on the weightages you have given to price, quality & delivery.
    Does this clarify ?
    Best regards
    Ramki

  • Perform VENDOR EVALUATION for MORE THAN ONE VENDORS at a time

    Hello all,
    Please guide for any process where i can perform Vendor Evaluation for MORE THAN ONE vendors AT A TIME.
    At my location there are around thousand vendors, which are to be evaluated, and difficult to perform the evaluation process one-by-one.
    (ME61/ME62/ME63)
    Detailed replies with various possibilities would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Joy Ghosh

    The vendor evaluation for some thousand vendors at the same time has already been in SAP long before they developed LSMW. The purpose of LSMW is to load data from a legacy system, of course you can (mis-)use it for a lot other things.
    But you should not always use LSMW if you are to lazy to go thru the SAP standard menu to find a transaction like ME6G
    There you define a job that runs RM06LBAT report.
    You first have to define a selection variant for this report. this can be done in SE38 by entering the report name, select variant, clicking display, then entering a name for the variant and clicking Create.

  • Vendor Evaluation Report

    Hi All,
    We have a problem. The vendor evaluation report is not considering the rejections of goods and shows the quality as 100.
    The client has not maintained any scores for quality. This may be the reason, or is it mandatory to have QM module to evaluate vendors based on quality??
    Currently they receive goods into GR blocked stock first. If its fine, then they goods receipt it or else they return it using Mov Type 124. Please suggest.
    Thanks & Regards
    VT

    hi
    for vendor evalution you have to do the necessary settings in MM and QM. then you have to carry out the transactions in MM and QM

  • Standard report for Vendor Evaluation

    Hi everyone,
    Is there any standard reports (ALV) to display Vendor evaluation ranking list except ME65, ME6B, ME6H.
    any other Program names will also do...
    Thanks
    Sukriti...

    hi
    S_ALR_87012990 - Evaluation Comparison
    ME6H - Standard Analysis: Vendor Evaluation
    ME6E - Evaluation Records Without Weighting
    ME6C - Vendors Without Evaluation
    ME6B - Display Vendor Evaluation for Material
    ME65 - Evaluation Lists
    regards
    kunal

Maybe you are looking for

  • Call Transaction not executing in Function Module

    Hi, I am sending an IDoc from non SAP system to SAP system,IDoc calls(Inbound Process Code) Function Module in which i wrote BDC code.i found that it is not calling Call Transaction  but when i test the same IDoc from WE19 it executes perfectly and u

  • Cant acsess my photos on i cloud

    2 months ago while my iphone 5 was updadting when it suddnely crashed and had to resore everything and so i lost almost every thing when my phone started agian i thought i would restore every thing from i clould but i t tolds me that there is no data

  • Arch as a semi-rolling release ? [Solved]

    Hi, I'm considering setting an "old" server  (bi-xeon) for my students in computer science -- mainly to learn programming languages and tools. They only needs to log in via an ssh -Y session from their Windows accounts. Arch rolling release is perfec

  • What is View Instantiation???

    I have been reading 10g Performance Tuning doc and came across view instantiation over here: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14211/sql_1016.htm#i22206 << 11.5.4.1.1 Use Caution When Joining Complex Views Joins to complex view

  • Sample rate of audio!

    Where can i find out the sample rate of my audio? Thank you