Queue Scaling by Multiple Queues

Hi,
I see that there is an option to "Scale" Instances in Azure Management portal.
My question is pertaining to scaling based on "Queue"?
I have a Cloud Service and I want to increase instances based on MULTIPLE QUEUES. Is it possible?
Currently, it allows to scale by only one queue.
Apppreciate any help on the matter.
Viral.

I'm sorry but it's possibile to configure the service to scale by only one queue.
Davide 'n3wt0n' Benvegnù
If you found my answer helpful, please vote it.
If you think that my answer resolve your issue, plase "Mark it as answer".

Similar Messages

  • Multiple Queue Assignment for Integration Process - PI 7.11

    Hi,
    I am trying to configure multiple Queues for an Integration Process.
    The Integration Process is straight forward, except for a Asynchronous Request Response pattern with correlation. (A asynch send step - immediately followed by a asynchronous receive step with Correlation)
    I have done the following
    1) In IR set the Queue as Multiple - Content Specific
    2) In SWF_INB_CONF transaction reconfigured Multiple Queues - Content Specific without buffering
    But when I trigger the message, the message is not at all triggering/entering the Integration Process. The error message is BPE Internal Failure.
    But if I reconfigure the IP as One Configurable Queue & "Without Buffering", it is working. But we want multiple queues assigned to this Process.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Sudharshan N A

    Bjoern, there are blogs/wikis available which should be searched before a question is asked on forum. The information you need is quite basic one and I will therefore lock this thread.
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • How do I use same MDB for multiple Queues? Deployment ?

              Here is what I am trying to do
              I have written one MDB that I want to use for multiple queues. I have seen posting
              mentioning that code a new weblogic-ejb-jar.xml to define other queues as the
              solution.
              Is there any other work around?
              I want to add queues in future as and when needed. I don't want to modify the
              already deployed jar to replace it with new weblogic-ejb-jar.xml everytime I have
              to add another queue for the message-driven-bean. Is is possible to use some kind
              of reference tag and just put weblogic-ejb-jar.xml in a new jar file and deply
              that every time I have a new queue to use for this MDB ( I don't think so, but
              again ???).
              Any help would be greatly appreciated.
              Chris
              

    Sorry -- that's the only solution for now.
              greg
              "Chris" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              news:[email protected]..
              >
              > Here is what I am trying to do
              >
              > I have written one MDB that I want to use for multiple queues. I have seen
              posting
              > mentioning that code a new weblogic-ejb-jar.xml to define other queues as
              the
              > solution.
              >
              > Is there any other work around?
              >
              > I want to add queues in future as and when needed. I don't want to modify
              the
              > already deployed jar to replace it with new weblogic-ejb-jar.xml everytime
              I have
              > to add another queue for the message-driven-bean. Is is possible to use
              some kind
              > of reference tag and just put weblogic-ejb-jar.xml in a new jar file and
              deply
              > that every time I have a new queue to use for this MDB ( I don't think so,
              but
              > again ???).
              >
              > Any help would be greatly appreciated.
              >
              > Chris
              

  • How to implement multiple queues in one circular buffer?

    Spoiler (Highlight to read)
    Recently I have successfully shared data of 2D array among different vis in a project, using circular buffer.
    However, there is only one circular buffer allowed in one project for one data type.
    I want different vis, running and getting data from circular buffer in different speed, all getting data as a queue from circular buffer. Like the circular buffer's read continuous mode.
    The problem is that after a vi reads in continuous mode, the read data is deleted from the circular buffer. Then other vis can not use them any more and can not keep track where they should begin to read again.
    So if it is possible that there are multiple pointers or queues in circular buffer to keep track the progress of different vis, and data only update when it gets input from DAQ but not deleted when read?   

    LawrenceChong wrote:
    Spoiler (Highlight to read)
    Recently I have successfully shared data of 2D array among different vis in a project, using circular buffer.
    However, there is only one circular buffer allowed in one project for one data type.
    I want different vis, running and getting data from circular buffer in different speed, all getting data as a queue from circular buffer. Like the circular buffer's read continuous mode.
    The problem is that after a vi reads in continuous mode, the read data is deleted from the circular buffer. Then other vis can not use them any more and can not keep track where they should begin to read again.
    So if it is possible that there are multiple pointers or queues in circular buffer to keep track the progress of different vis, and data only update when it gets input from DAQ but not deleted when read?   
    THe last time I wrote a multi-subscriber cirular buffer was in LV 6. Since then I have found that polymorphic queues perform much better so I now use multiple queues. One queue for each subscriber of the data. The subscribers are then responsible for maintaining their own histories.
    So just use multiple queues.
    Ben
    Ben Rayner
    I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
    Rayner's Ridge is under construction

  • Http to Abap Proxy communication with multiple queues generation in Recevr

    Dear SDNs,
    I need some help in the following scenario, appreciate your suggestions and help .
    I am receiving the messages from sender to PI on http posting, from PI  I am sending the message to SAP system using receiver xi communication channel ( receiver is abap proxy).
    Sender will send the messages in QOS=EOIO, QUEueID=XXXt_100 etc  parameters, when large volumes cases, it is getting delayed to process it using a single queue.
    We are thinking to dynamically  generate multiple queues in PI and send the same queue ids to receiver SAP system to process all the messages quickly in SAP System also.
    Help /Clarifications needed:
    1. XI receiver communication channel in  pi  does not provide any options to generate dynamic queue id based on payload content (using dynamic configuration) and sent it to SAP.
    2. Module Tab in receiver communication channel also got disabled to add  custom adapter modules, can we add custome adapter module on xi receiver channel to generate dynamic queue id ?
    Really appreciate your immediate help and suggestions.
    Thanks.
    Suraj.

    Dear Praveen,
    Thanks lot for the immediate reply, we need to use EOIO, as the messages need to be processed in the same order we send and receive, there is no flexibility in QOS=EOIO, Appreciate if there is any other thoughts?
    Thanks In Advance.
    Suraj.

  • Multiple queue vs single queue - peformance

    Hi All,
    Could pls throw some light on the following design.
    Currenty, We have more than 100 queues and for each there is a different MDB to receive the message.Now, somehow we made a single instance of same MDB listen to all these queues by looking at the input message. The requiement now is, is it possible to club all the queues into single queue as it's asynchronous messaging. The receiver may also try write into the same queue at the end of message processing.If so, how would be performance. Is this performance better than having multiple queues?.
    The message are expecting to be 25 k/day in the queue. And we are using Weblogic server.
    Please let me know if you need more details.
    Thanks
    Srinath

    You could try to use selectors to assign messages to particular MDBs. This way you off load some of the work on the broker but selectors by their nature usually have an impact on broker's performance. It all depends on your application, your expectations, size and the rate of your messages, how long it takes to process them on the client side. There is no simple answer in this case. You would have to test some scenarios to come up with a best solution that fits your requirements. Having said that I personally believe that some degree of partitioning of your queue could be beneficial. On a heavily loaded system it may increase the concurrency of the system and its resilience, particularly if you place the queues in different brokers. Try to imagine your broker as if it was a DB server with just one table (I'm not sure if this is the best analogy but I can't think about anything else at the moment).

  • Single Queue Vs Multiple Queues

    Hi,
    I am in the process of architecting some queues between remote databases. There are different document types being propagated from one queue to another, and they have different priorities. At the end queue there are multiple processes to dequeue and action the different document types.
    My question is, is it better to have one end queue for each process/document type ( ie multiple end point queues), or one single end point queue with all the documents in them regardless of the type?
    I know that it is possible to have the single queue end point, but is this the best option and why?
    Thanks,
    matt

    Hi Peter,
    What do you mean by different document type?Document content only is different. The payload will be the same. All the documents will be passed through as blobs. The payload will have a field to define the document content type.
    Do you intend to store different message types in the same source queue?At this stage we can go either way. If we have one single end point queue we will more than likely have one single source queue.
    If so what is the definition of the payload? The payload definition will be the same in all cases, both source and destination.
    What version of databases are you propagating between?10.2
    How many dequeueing processes will you have at the remote end?One program for each of the different document content type (invoices, remittance, etc.). Initially there will be 4, but this is likely to grow to 12 or more.
    Ultimately we expect around 10,000 documents per day to pass through the system.
    Thanks,
    Matt

  • How can a JMS adapter be configured in BPEL to consume messages from multiple queues ?

    How can a JMS adapter be configured in BPEL to consume messages from multiple queues ?

    If you want to use JMS with AQ as datastore then there is some configuration you need to do to enable this. This is outside SOA Suite per sa, e.g. no adapter required.
    If you want to connect to the AQ direct then use the AQ adapter.
    this blog may be of some help understand the configuration
    http://biemond.blogspot.com/2008/01/oracle-jms-with-esb-and-bpel.html
    cheers
    James

  • Multiple Queues in BPM

    Hey,
        In case of multiple queues in BPM.
        say for instance multiple queues(random)      
        When we check in SXI_MONITOR, in the QueueID column we get :
              XBPE_TaskId_No_QueueId.
    Please can you tell me what is the significance of  "No" in the above QueueId
    normally its 1 or 2.
        can you also tell me how it affects the queue behavior.
    regards,
           Milan

    Prateek that is what i have done.
    two files are picked from the file adapter they are merged and placed back on the ftp.
    Now this scenario was working as expected when the no was 1. (i.e it went into sysfail, when both the files of the same instance entered different queues)
    but in subsequent runs, when no was 2,  it started working as i have explained. (i.e. it worked absolutely fine without getting into sysfail)
    I have not done any changes in the configuration it happened automatically.
    so i am not able to understand the phenomena.
    regards,
        Milan

  • Multiple Queues - Dequeueing resources?

    We have multiple queues on our database which have been configured to be automatically processed by registering stored procedures with each of the queues. The processing of messages works fine, however if we have messages in both queues then it appears as though an attempt is made to process all messages in one queue before it processes messages in the other queue. Are there any settings that we can look at setting to distribute the processing equally between queues?

    Other than job_queue_processes, I don't know.
    Have you made any progress with this?

  • One queue or multiple queues?

              Hi all,
              I have a JMS-based app that performs a few business functions, and each business
              function is handled by a single MDB. These MDBs see moderate traffic volumes
              (<5000 msg/day), and my question is this:
              Is it better to leave this design as-is, or is it better to merge these MDBs
              and their
              corresponding queues and use JMS selector to decide what biz function to perform?
              -j
              

    Performance-wise it is better to use multiple queues, but
              your message rate is likely too low for this to make
              a difference.
              There is another advantage to using multiple queues:
              they make it easier for system administrators to
              see the statistics for different business processes, and
              possible to manage each differently.
              John wrote:
              > Hi all,
              >
              > I have a JMS-based app that performs a few business functions, and each business
              > function is handled by a single MDB. These MDBs see moderate traffic volumes
              > (<5000 msg/day), and my question is this:
              >
              > Is it better to leave this design as-is, or is it better to merge these MDBs
              > and their
              > corresponding queues and use JMS selector to decide what biz function to perform?
              >
              > -j
              

  • Multiple Queues(Content Specific) - Can't get more than two queues

    Hi,
    I have a ccBPM scenario, which collects messages read by the file adapter and then sends them grouped.
    It's working fine in many different configurations, but I'd like to configure it in a way described in the PDF "How Tou2026 Configure Inbound Processing in ccBPM Part II: Queue Assignment", which is using Multiple queues - content specific.
    If I put 2 queues (after defining a correlation for a message field batchID), it works fine. The messages with batchID=A are processed by one instance process from queue 001, and the messages with batchID=B are processed by another instance process from queue 002.
    But if I put 4 queues (SWF_INB_CONF), all the message still keep going to just 2 queues, and not 4. There is no problem, because still the messages with batchID = X are all processed by the same instance process, but I want to add more parallelization to the process using 4 queues.
    I've refreshed cache and reactivated, but it will still work with 2 queues and not 4. I've also made sure that the files read have 4 different batchIDs equally distributed among all the files.
    I don't know what I'm missing...
    Thanks!

    Solved it with SAP help.
    It seems that even if you config 4 queues (content-specific) to be used in SWF_INB_CONF, it is normal that not all queues allowed are used at runtime. The messages are distributed to the queues based on the correlation defined for the process, narrowing down the result afterwards to the number of allowed queues using a hash algorithm.
    Often it is necessary to specify 50-100% more queues to load the actually intended number of queues with messages.
    I could reach 4 queues really used setting the parameter to 10 queues.

  • Agent in multiple queues

    Is it possible to have an agent choose the queue he/she logs into?  I know it can be done on a Nortel BCM but not sure about UCCX.  If it is possible, how does that work?  ie. does the agent see a list of choices in a drop down menu or???

    UCCX has the concept of Contact Service Queues.
    Contact Service Queues select from available agents based on one of 2 parameters:
    Resource Group
    Resource Skill: with skill levels from 1 to 10.
    Each agent can be added to one resource group, and can have multiple skills.
    Thus, an agent can be present in 1 Resource Group CSQ, and multiple Resource Skill CSQs.
    Agents cannot choose to log in to different CSQs. The closest: in UCCX 9.0+, supervisors can dynamically re-skill agents using the Mobile Skill Manager: http://UCCX/mobileskillmanager/
    Thanks & Regards,
    Anirudh
    "Protocol, then product"

  • Multiple queue receivers with disjoint message selectors - portable?

    Hi all,
    I was wondering whether an application that uses multiple queue receivers with disjoint message selectors would be portable across different JMS providers.
    I fear it's not - at least the spec clearly states that the implementation of message delivery to multiple receivers is provider specific, and I couldn't find any comment that this would be different with disjoint selectors. But I wanted to check with you - maybe I missed anything?
    What could be an alternative then (in case you want to avoid multiple queues)? Using a topic with durable subscribers?
    Regards,
    Sabine

    Hi Nimo,
    accepted - as long as the JMS spec requires the JMS provider to support multiple receivers. And that's exactly the point where I'm not sure...
    Literally it states:
    "For PTP, JMS does not specify the semantics of concurrent QueueReceivers for the same queue; however, JMS does not prohibit a provider from supporting this."
    The formulation "does not prohibit" makes me think that JMS allows providers also not to support this, for example, to throw an exception when a second consumer is created for the same queue, or not to serve it at all with messages as long as the first consumer is active. Not that I think it would be a very useful implementation - I just want to know if it would be possible. In that case, the application would not be portable.
    Regards,
    Sabine

  • Packages to multiple queues/groups

    Hi,
    We have an application, which sends/receives applicant packages from single queue Ex: Queue name is 'XYZ'. We would like to have the packages to be received to different queues based on the City name from where they are sending, how can we achieve this?
    Ex: User 'A' belongs to NY City and logged into 'ABC' group, he sends one package which is received by applicant, applicant fills in the form and sends the email back, now it has to come and sit in 'ABC' queue. Like this we would like to maintain multiple queues and get the requests to corresponding queue.
    I am very new to Adobe LiveCycle ES Workbench, can anybody guide me to achieve this.
    Thanks in advance.
    PK.

    LiveCycle doesn't really allow you to create "queues" - rather, there is automatically a queue created for each user and group. So if you want to create a queue called "ABC", the easiest way is to create a group called "ABC". Then you can assign all the people who you want to be able to action the item to the group.
    You can create the Group either in LDAP, or within Adminui.
    Howard
    http://www.avoka.com

Maybe you are looking for