QUEUEs Waiting

Hello,
I've a interface IDOC to JDBC.
I'd a problem with this and other interfaces, both had the same IDOC.
This problem was solved posting a condition in the interface determination.
Since that time when i execute the interface, the message remains in waiting status and all interfaces that run subsequently too, ie, the interface queue collapses. It is solved release the queues but I need to know why this interface queues collapses and what can i do to avoid it?
Thanks very much,

Thanks,
Shabarish,
did you register the queues in SXMB_ADM -> Manage Queues ?, yes
Divya,
Try schedule the report RSQOWKEX (Outbound Queues) and RSQIWKEX (Inbound Queues) so that messages odnt get stuck in queues., This don't solved my problem, when the interface is raising it remains in waiting
Any other idea?

Similar Messages

Project Online - Projects getting regularly stuck in queue - waiting to be processed

Hello,
We have an issue with a client that is using Project Online with around 80 projects and 100 users. However projects are regularly getting stuck in the queue and show "waiting to be processed" when the check-in is failing.
This is consistently happening and the only way to clear the queue is to cancel the pending jobs.
Please advise.
Thanks

Yep - that's what we did although wasn't entirely a success as they couldn't really identify the root cause. The problem seemed to be a bottleneck in the processing of projects that remain checked out. Projects seem to take a while to check in. The
more projects that are in the queue waiting to be checked in the longer the gap between each successful check-in, and there is a point at which project check-in times out, leaving the project in a checked in state. Projects that are published we noticed
users are not allowing enough time for the project to save correctly before publishing. and so projects get to 80% checked in state and then publishing fails of course.
However, not to be outdone, we have now built a utility that will run through every project, check to see whether it needs to be published (compares draft and published projects), then checks it out, updates the project, saves it and publishes it, then
checks it back in, with a user variable wait time between each operation. That way we can automate the check-in and publishing process with NO errors in the queue and all projects successfully publish and check in OK. !! With several hundreds
of projects (will be thousands) to deal with it works perfectly ! :-)

Render queue waits for FTP upload

I Googled this issue and looked it up in this forum, and surprisingly found nothing.
When using the feature for automatically uploading an exported file to an FTP server, Adobe Media Encoder renders 1 file, uploads it, and meanwhile the rest of the render queue is paused. Obviously, the upload process takes almost no CPU or RAM, so I'd expect Media Encoder to continue rendering the rest of the queue in parallel to uploading.
Am I missing somehint obvious, or a bit less obvious (some hidden setting)?
In my company's production worklow, it's very common practice to send out a long render queue and simultaneously upload the completed files. Having to wait for each upload in order for the rendering to resume seems counter intuitive, basically making the FTP feature useless.
Thanks in advance

Hi Jamal:
You can disregard the Flash alerts
Your problem is that there is no content to display except for the Flash movie which is not displaying because it has not
been uploaded to the root folder.
You are also missing the "Scripts" folder with the "swfobject_modified.js" script in it.
Go forth and upload these, and you should be OK.

Reports job in queue waiting for the others

Hi, I have a problem with my Reports, I have created a reports cluster and increased the engine number, but anyway once I send two jobs the second job waits until the first job is completed.
Any idea, If I'll have 20 users the last user has to wait 10 min to get his report printed.

Hi,
Reports Server can have multiple engines. If one engine is busy, the job can be forwarded to the other engine. You can control the number of engines with this element in the Reports Server configurtion file:
<engine id="rwEng" class="oracle.reports.engine.EngineImpl" initEngine="1" maxEngine="1" minEngine="0" engLife="50" maxIdle="30" callbackTimeOut="60000">
You can increase the maxEngine attribute to 2.
But be careful with the number of engines. A very large number of engines may also bring down the performance by consuming more memory.
Navneet.

Messages waiting indefinetely in queue -- how to purge

Hi All,
I have around 900 messages in the outbound queue waiting in the past 2 days .
Is there any way to purge sceduled messages in the Queue (SMQ1,SMQ2)?
My messages are indefinetely growing in the message queue without processing. I understand I need to configure a background job for that.
Which transaction code should i use to schedule Backgound job for Messages ( not BPM) ?
Is there any way I can purge these messages from the queue before they get processed by XI?
if yes please let me know the way.
Because of this a scenario I run today is scheduled in the queue after 3 days and my receiver is unable to get the message.
Regards,
Meher

Hi All,
Thanks All for helping me.
Initiated a search for all the messages waiting on all the Queues.
Status of all the messages shows : <b>To Be Delivered</b>
Messages were processed successfully till some date. we have a system down after that.
From then on messages are not being processed.
Am I missing in the job configuration for the Queues.
Queue status is displayed as Ready ( no errors)
Regards,
Meher
This is not a production environment.

Queue Messages initiated by Wait Time?

Hi, within ICM Script Editor, Release, 8.5.4.0. Via script, Is there any way to automatically play/initiate a message based on the longest wait time or a time value? For example, if a customer called us and entered our queue, if there was a current queue wait time (or longest call waiting value) of over 5 minutes, could we initiate a message to say "There is currently a wiat time of over 5 minutes, if you would like to call us back please call.....etc"
Thanks!

Hi, within ICM Script Editor, Release, 8.5.4.0. Via script, Is there any way to automatically play/initiate a message based on the longest wait time or a time value? For example, if a customer called us and entered our queue, if there was a current queue wait time (or longest call waiting value) of over 5 minutes, could we initiate a message to say "There is currently a wiat time of over 5 minutes, if you would like to call us back please call.....etc"
Thanks!

Workflow in event queue based on a deleted object

Hi all,
I'm facing a problem with a workflow that goes to the event queue, meanwhile the object is deleted and then the WF is released from the event queue in Error. The WF is based on the BO BUS2032 (sales order).
Here are the steps:
1-Sales order created or changed --> event generated --> WF linked to that event goes to event queue
2-Meanwhile the WF is the event queue waiting to be released, the sales order is deleted
3-The WF is released from the event queue but in ERROR status (this is because the BO instance does not exist anymore)
In this scenario, is there a way to end the WF with CANCELLED status instead of ERROR? is there anyy FM or exit you know ehere I can check if the BO still exists once the WF is released from the event queue?
Thanks!!!!!

Some questions/options:
1) How/why does the WF go into an error exactly? Does it try to complete the first step? What if you put a condition step as a first step in the WF and check whether the object is initial and if it is, then cancel the workflow.
2) How about deleting the event from the queue from some user-exit/badi in the sales order deletion. If I remember correctly the events when queued are in table SWEQUEUE. Probably you can find some function to delete events from the queue. Take a look for example function SWE_EVENT_QUEUE_DELETE to see the idea. Or take a look into transaction SWEAD. There you can delete events from queue. Check what it does and do the same in your code.
3) Is this really a big problem? Are there so many sales orders deleted?
In general I think that the whole event queue seems to many times cause lots of problems (the event queue job disappears, WFs will not get started, and whatever.). I try to avoid using it.
Regards,
Karri

Messages in BPM with Status Waiting

Hi,
I have created BPM for Message Collect like the standard SAP Pattern BpmPatternCollectMessage. But for terminating Message Ive used Message type (Message interface) different from the Message type in the main Fork section. I thought that it is possible correlation between two message Interfaces with different Message types?
Any way I had an Error in my BPM and after a test the Status for my Messages is Successful for inbound and Waiting (Message being sent) for Outbound. All my Messages are collected in a Queue, Wait step is created but BPM dont proceed further.
So Ive made some changes in my BPM and tried with a new Test but it works with the old Version of the BPM and collects the Messages in the same Queue. So any idea how can I use the new BPM version? Should I Delete Manually the old Messages with Status Waiting or there is also different way?
Thanks
Naycho

>>>I thought that it is possible correlation between two message Interfaces with different Message types?
yes it is
>>>>All my Messages are collected in a Queue, Wait step is created but BPM dont proceed further.
have you registered queues on XI? TCODE - SXMB_ADM - manage queues ?
>>>Test but it works with the old Version of the BPM and collects
try looking at: SXI_CACHE - integration process- check if your new process has 0 status - activated
Regards,
michal

JMS: is it possible to monitor the length of the queues?

Hi,
is it possible to monitor in realtime how many messages are in a JMS queue waiting for being processed?
I'm using the standalone OC4J.
Matteo Candaten

Hi Matteo Candaten,
I have a problem in JMS.
I had created the tables related to queues in DB. i had also bound the queues with the JNDI names in jms.xml
Still i am unable to use the queues.
I am getting an error saying,
javax.jms.JMSException: Unable to connect to JMSServer (127.0.0.1/127.0.0.1:9127)
at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindQueueConnection.connect(EvermindQueueConnection.java:144)
at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindQueueConnection.send(EvermindQueueConnection.java:94)
at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindQueueSession.send(EvermindQueueSession.java:117)
at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindQueueSender.send(EvermindQueueSender.java:75)
at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindQueueSender.send(EvermindQueueSender.java:36)
at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindQueueSender.send(EvermindQueueSender.java:31)
at OracleJmsSender.sendXmlMessage(OracleJmsSender.java:115)
at OracleJmsSender.<init>(OracleJmsSender.java:57)
at OracleJmsSender.main(OracleJmsSender.java:138)
Can you please give me some idea, how to configure and use JMS in oracle 9ias and
the properties i had set are,
static String JNDI_FACTORY = "com.evermind.server.rmi.RMIInitialContextFactory";
     static String SERVER_URL = "ormi://dsrso2:23791/";
     static String USER_NAME = "admin";
     static String PASSWORD = "kumardsr";
     static String FACTORY_NAME = "jms/TTQueueConnectionFactory";
     static String QUEUE_NAME = "jms/demoQueue";
are these correct or do i need to change these ??
I just dont have a clue where i am worng.
it would be of great help if u could help me in this..
thanks a lot..
Kalpana

CUIC Report - Queue Status

Dear Group
I am recently been started working with UCCE platform, for one of our client who is using CTI Desktop Client (V8.5) required to have
A field in the CTI screen about the number of calls currently queued or waiting in the queue
A CUIC report for the manager to show the status of the queue or no of calls waiting in the queue waiting to allocated to an agent
Please let me know the best way to achieve this
thanks in advance
Rajesh

The agents can click on the stats button of their CTIOS desktop and will see how many calls are in queue for the skill groups they are in. For CUIC, run a call type report and report on the call type right before the call enters the queue. This will give you the best and most accurate information about the queue.
david

Message Queue in XI is stuck

Hi,
I am using Idoc adapter to implement an ECC-XI-ECC scenario.
My scenario works fine. But the problem is that the XI is throwing out messages to the target system (ECC) one by one.
It means that once an inbound message comes into XI, it pushes the message already in the XI queue to the receiver system and my existing inbound message just sits in the queue waiting to be pushed again.
Please tell me how to solve this problem.
I am sending a PO Idoc from sender to target.
Thanks & Regards,
Shobhit

Hi Ravikiran,
There was no problem. I got confused because the Incoming IDoc and outgoing IDoc numbers were different and I was under a wrong impression that they should be the same.
But I got to learn 2 new Tcodes from you. I was looking for that exactly. 10 points to you!!!
Thanks Michal, my queues were already registered.
Regards,
Shobhit

Outgoing messages delayed in smarthostconnectordelivery queue

I have an Exchange server that uses a 3rd party SPAM appliance as a smarthost. It's been working great for a few years but suddenly I'm getting messages sitting the smarthostconnectordelivery queue with a status of Ready for approximately 5 minutes before
sending. The good news is mail is moving, but always with a 5 minute rest in the queue before moving to the smarthost.
There are no errors on the messages
There are no errors on the queue
The Protocol log doesn't shown any attempts to connect to the smart host until it has sat in the queue for about 5 minutes.
The output of the queue is shown below
DeliveryType         : SmartHostConnectorDelivery
NextHopDomain        : smarthost-a.contoso.com,smarthost-b.contoso.com,smarthost-c.contoso.com
TlsDomain            :
NextHopConnector     : 8eb0ec78-bb81-486d-a194-65cee5be1e5d
Status               : Active
MessageCount         : 144
LastError            :
LastRetryTime        : 5/2/2013 2:52:34 PM
NextRetryTime        :
DeferredMessageCount : 0
QueueIdentity        : TRANSPORTSERVER\2970455
Identity             : TRANSPORTSERVER\2970455
IsValid              : True
The problem is very similar to the issue described here:http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchange2010/thread/f0b1a4ef-650d-4fe3-8838-4b4effbe47ed
I think the problem is smarthost related but Exchange is not giving any indication of failing to connect/getting deferred by the smarthost. Is there a log for this info?

I am looking for the solution to the same problem. Can you give me some tips? There is an
Email queue waiting to relay to the smart host in Exchange.I checked the receive-log and send-log.It can not tell me what happened during the waiting time.
In the receive-log, 1051am, exchange had received the email.
In the send-log, 1102am, "attempting to connect the smart host" ,then the waiting
emails sent out immediately.
Where can I know what happened between 1051am and 1102am?
Look forward to your replay. Thank you.
I checked our mail gateway,there were numbers of emails in the queue.Maybe it was the root cause.

Wait and notify in Object

Hi,
Who can give me a short java code segment to show the method wait and notify of the class Object.
I've already tryed as forlow:
try {
A a = new A();
a.wait() ;
catch (InterruptedException ex) {
ex.printStackTrace() ;
But a thread is always be thrown:
java.lang.IllegalMonitorStateException: current thread not owner
     at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
     at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:420)
     at A.main(A.java:34)
Who can tell which thread should be the owner thread? I did realize noly one thread there.
Thanks a million.

The classic example is two threads, on adding items to a queue and one taking them off and processing them:
// consumer
Object item = null;
do {
   synchronized(queue) {
      if(queue.isEmpty())
          queue.wait();
    item = queue.remove(0);
// process item
} while(!Thread.currentThread.isInterrupted());
// producer
synchronized(queue) {
    if(queue.isEmpty())
      queue.notify();
   queue.add(item);
   }The use of synchronized blocks or methods is essential. They guard against conflicts and race conditions between different sections that change the same data.

Workflow not coming out of WAIT mode

Hi,
In the Requisition workflow I had applied a WAIT of 5 mins in the approval process. But even if we approve the status does not change to 'APPROVED' even after 30 mins. Though notifications are sent. In teh status monitor it shows Deferred: WAIT. I have scheduled the Workflow background process for every min with teh parameters as 'YES'. It gets approved after a very long time and hence slows the other flow which is not acceptible.
Any clue of how to avoid it?

What does a wfstat output show?
If you are using the standard WAIT activity, then the background engine should process that with no problem. If you try to execute WF_ENGINE.Background from a SQL session, what happens?
When there is a big delay, how many records are on the WF_DEFERRED queue waiting to be processed?
Are you running the background engine for all item types, or just for this one?
Matt
WorkflowFAQ.com - the ONLY independent resource for Oracle Workflow development
Alpha review chapters from my book "Developing With Oracle Workflow" are available via my website http://www.workflowfaq.com
Have you read the blog at http://www.workflowfaq.com/blog ?
WorkflowFAQ support forum: http://forum.workflowfaq.com

Queue producer send() method failure

          Scenario.
          3 Weblogic 8.1 servers clustered.
          3 JMS Servers in the cluster (one per server) with JDBCStores for persistent messages.
          JMS Distributed Queue with a member on each JMS server.
          Question.
          Should the send method (i.e. QueueSender.send(Message)) fail for the dist. queue
          producer if the JDBC Store is offline (database down)? The following paragraph
          from the 8.1 JMS docs suggests so - A persistent message is guaranteed to be delivered
          once-and-only-once. The message cannot be lost due to a JMS provider failure,
          but it must not be delivered twice. It is not considered sent until it has been
          safely written to a file or database. WebLogic JMS writes persistent messages
          to a persistent backing store (disk-base file or JDBC-accessible database) assigned
          to each JMS server during configuration.
          But our observation is that the send method does not fail, in fact the messages
          produced to the queue.
          What is the correct behavior?
          Thanks.


          Hi,
          Yes, db is started when server boots and all consumers are available before db
          shutdown. We are noticing the same bahavior for listener vs. full database shutdown.
          Thanks,
          Michael
          "Kats" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >
          >Hi
          >
          >First, I assume this is a runtime scenario, that is the db instance was
          >available
          >during the server boot, but went down later on during runtime.
          >
          >Second, do you have the consumers attached to the queue waiting to receive
          >messages,
          >before the send happens ?
          >
          >Thanks
          >
          >
          >"Michael Roth" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >>
          >>Scenario.
          >>3 Weblogic 8.1 servers clustered.
          >>3 JMS Servers in the cluster (one per server) with JDBCStores for persistent
          >>messages.
          >>JMS Distributed Queue with a member on each JMS server.
          >>
          >>Question.
          >>Should the send method (i.e. QueueSender.send(Message)) fail for the
          >>dist. queue
          >>producer if the JDBC Store is offline (database down)? The following
          >>paragraph
          >>from the 8.1 JMS docs suggests so - A persistent message is guaranteed
          >>to be delivered
          >>once-and-only-once. The message cannot be lost due to a JMS provider
          >>failure,
          >>but it must not be delivered twice. It is not considered sent until
          >it
          >>has been
          >>safely written to a file or database. WebLogic JMS writes persistent
          >>messages
          >>to a persistent backing store (disk-base file or JDBC-accessible database)
          >>assigned
          >>to each JMS server during configuration.
          >>
          >>But our observation is that the send method does not fail, in fact the
          >>messages
          >>produced to the queue.
          >>
          >>What is the correct behavior?
          >>
          >>Thanks.
          >

QUEUEs Waiting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for