Quicktime export is different than what's in the timeline

I'm editing a demo reel for an actor friend. One of the scenes is from a television show, but the scene she's in is not with any of the shows' more recognizable stars, so I wanted to put a little bit of the title sequence/music in front of it to make sure people knew what show it was. So I put about 3 seconds worth of it in. It looks great in the sequence, but when I do an export to quicktime (broadband medium) that title sequence is slightly askew... instead of the 3 second chunk that's clearly in the timeline, it's a 3-second chunk about 10 seconds prior to what is in the sequence. This is driving me insane. Any idea what could be causing this?
Oh, I just upgraded to Studio 2, if that makes a difference.

I thought of that too, but it was ripped from a (non-copy protected) DVD, and the title sequence is its own chapter. So of course, the little chunk I need to use is pretty much at the tail end... I don't have 10 seconds after it.
Thanks for the suggestion, though!

Similar Messages

What's showing in the layer palette is different than what is on the canvas - Illustrator CS6

I am not a super user in Illustrator but I know my way around it and understand more than the basics. I downloaded this vector from Shutterstock, but what I am seeing on the layer palette is different from what is on the canvas and if I try to save or export it to anything else the result comes out looking like the layers palette - almost black.
And it's only happening on a few of the objects, as you can see from the image, the apple and other leaves are fine. It is also doing it to the pumkin and some of the grapes in the cornicopia. Any idea what is going on? I checked all my layers to see if something looked weird but they all look fine...
When I open the original .eps file from Shutterstock in Photoshop, I get the same black objects.

What OS? If Mac, then this might be affecting you.
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1070677?tstart=0

FCP7 HELP - Exported quicktime mov plays differently than what I edited on the timeline. The playback shows the clips with ins and outs that are different than what I set in the clips when I edited - some are too early and the clips don't playback

Please help ASAP.
Specs: IOS 10.6.8
Processor 2.4GHz Intel Core i5
Memory 4GB 1333 MHz DDR3 -- Everything is edited, sourced, and stored on an 2TB external hard drive to make things go faster.
Editing with FCP 7
When I export the sequence I edited with quicktime, the playback video is very different from what I edited on the timeline. The playback has the clips with ins and outs that are way off than what I cut, and some of the clips don't show at all or have changed transitions. However when I play in the timeline in FCP, the sequence is fine, just the way I cut it.
The source of the clips was one long .mov that I cut into clips for the timeline. Everything has gone smoothly but the exported .mov is just so different.
How can I get the time codes of the clips to be the same in the exported .movs? I just want the quicktime .mov to represent my edit exactly.
This video is due tomorrow - if the solution is too time consuming, can I play within the FCP player window and Log and Capture?
Thanks,
MV

What is your source material? Is it H.264? FCP does not work correctly with that material.
Click on a source clip in the FCP Browser, and once selected, type Command + 9 to see the item properties for the clip. Either report those properties, or take a screen shot of the item properties, and post that here.
Next, click anywhere in your timeline, and then type Command + 0 {zero} to see your Sequence Settings. Either report those Sequence Settings, or take a screen shot of the Sequence Settings and post that here.
MtD

When I share the video it exports a different version than what appears in the timeline

I've had a really frustrating few days waiting for exports (to Apple Devices) and processing (when uploading to Vimeo). In my timeline appears the properly edited video, but when it gets shared, the video drops clips that I have added, and includes clips that I removed early in the editing process, and gives me a final product that is not my intended video. Please help, need to get this video uploaded for a client yesterday!

Changes made inside compounds are reflected in the project - there is one caveat and I wonder if that was the case for you: compounds, like any other clip, are trimmed to a given duration in the timeline. If your changes made that duration change, you'd have to adjust in the project timeline. For example if you create a 1 minute compound and then edit in its own timeline so that it beco es, say, 5 minutes, it will still be trimmed to 1 minute in the project timeline, and you may have to drag the edges of the clip to extend as much as you wish. This is NOT a bug.

Time stamps in reports are different than what is on the record

We have some users in the UK who have their time setting set to GMT. On our SR form, we have a few date/time fields. The data on the form is correct.. When they run a report with these fields, the time is adjusted by 8 hours, or PST, which is the time zone in our company profile.
How can we make sure the reports show the correct time based on the users time zone?

Did you get an answer re this David? Currently a client is having the same issue, trying to run an end of month report with some records entered on the last day of the month not being captured due to this time difference.

Exported DDL different than the SQL tab

Hi,
I found that the DDL generated by performing Tools->export is different than what is shown in the SQL tab on RHS window for any table.
Is there any reason, since the SQL tab's display is not useful to recreate the table, as the sequence of constraints/indexes is incorrect.
The tools->export generates DDL properly.
Can someone fix this issue?

The Tools - Export reads DBMS Metadata, the SQL Tab does not. This is intentional. However I have logged a bug about the sequence of the constraints/indexes to track that issue.
Regards
Sue

Adobe Media Encoder exports different video than what appears in CS4 timeline

I'm using Premiere CS4 to edit a short skiing video. All shots were taken using a GoPro @ 60fps, 720p. All of the clips were converted into slow motion by using "Interpret Footage" and setting the frame rate to 24. I used the sequence preset "AVCHD 720p 24", and editing seemed to work fine. The video played smoothly and correctly. However, after exporting in Adobe media encoder, the video was far different than what I previewed in the timeline. It seems as though each clip shows up at the correct time, but it disregarded any trimming I did to the clips and each one is played from the very beginning. Also, each clip plays extremely slowly, and there is signifigant ghosting (frame blending issue?). I can also see that the preview window that shows up while I set the export settings displays the incorrect video as well. However, if i change it from "source" to "output", it displays it correctly. I tried exporting using H.264 720 24p and the youtube HD widescreen preset, both of which failed. I am somewhat new to HD video, but I cannot seem to come up with any reason why my video will not export correctly. Any thoughts?
PC Specs:
Intel Q6700 quad core @ 2.66gh
4gb ddr2 ram
1tb 7200rmp hard drive
GeForce gt240 graphics card w/ 1gb dedicated video mem
windows 7 ultimate 64
All updates to premiere installed

I don't think AVCHD is the correct preset... but I use CS5 so not 100% sure
Flip or GoPro video http://forums.adobe.com/thread/437535?tstart=0
- And http://forums.adobe.com/thread/668369?tstart=0
- And http://blogs.adobe.com/VideoRoad/2009/12/using_a_flip_minohd_camera_wit.html
- Says to use the XDCAM EX 720p 30p (or 60p?) setting for Flip (maybe GoPro?)

How do I add a print button that would print out pdf or different version than what is on the site?

I see this example on NY Times. If you pick any of their articles and click print or do the short cut (Command-P) ... (Control-P for windows), the layout of their article is completely customized and cleaner. It seems like they've edited the print look to be different than what you see on the website.
I find that very cool and something I've bent dying to achieve. My guess is that I could make a pdf to what I want the print look to be and have a print button read that instead of the website but I don't know, I need help with this.

I have but it's not what I'm looking for. I want to edit what the printer will actually print when a reader clicks print. So if the page has a puzzle, for example, and the reader clicks print. The printer will print the puzzle in a different location on the page without some of the clutter that's on the site or have some message that's not originally present on the website.

I'm going to save my old Hi8 tapes on a hard disk using final cut pro x, to save it for the future. But how shall I export it, and in what will be the best quality to save it in?

I'm going to save my old Hi8 tapes on a hard disk using final cut pro x, to save it for the future. But how shall I export it, and in what will be the best quality to save it in?

Hi Carsten...good luck with your project.. I had just about as many Video8 & Hi8 tapes as
you that I digitized and eventually brought into FCPX..took me many months not weeks
to do so,BTW, as each tape was 60-90 minutes in lenght...and many hundreds of
gigab ytes of storage ( uncompressed AVI files)..it's tedious work unless you plan to farm
it out to a processing house...also regarding eventual storage format...remember
Hi8 is 400 lines or about 540X480 in todays resoultion metrics..you can't make hi-def out
of source that starts out as 400 lines...in my case I rewrapped the avi files into .mov
containers and imported the mov files into FCPX where I got rid of the hundreds of
minutes of Colorado mountain landscapes to get to that one minute shot of the kids
on horseback ( late 80's for most of my archives)..so its a job..scouring thru 30X90 min
of source to not miss those precious memories takes diligence and hard work but its worth
it; eventually I encode the uncompressed video I want to save in H.264 format Staandard
Def not HiDef

When I use the iPhone 5 camera zoom in, the picture takes of a lower image than what is on the screen? Anyone else?

When I use the iPhone 5 camera and I zoom in, the picture takes of a lower image than what is on the screen? Anyone else?

You mean like they do in the TV crime show shows like CSI? A cell phone screen from 20 feet is going to be way too small to make any sense of.

If a pdf file is written in indian language but prints off in a different language, what could be the issue?

if a pdf file is written in indian language but prints off in a different language, what could be the issue?

Most likely the issue is non-standard fonts. Are all used fonts embedded in the document?

I previously used Indesign CS4. I now have recently purchased Indesign CC. I have a Mac Yosemite 10.10.3. When I print, I cannot select my paper stock, other than what is in the print dialogue box, i.e. art paper. In Indesign CS4, I could choose fine art

previously used Indesign CS4. I now have recently purchased Indesign CC. I have a Mac Yosemite 10.10.3. When I print, I cannot select my paper stock, other than what is in the print dialogue box, i.e. art paper. In Indesign CS4, I could choose fine art paper etc. Where can I find this option in this new version?

With Snow Leopard, the Printing of PDFs has changed. Try using the highlighted option

Audio exporting in different format than what's set on timeline

I imported some long xdcam video files with two separate channels of audio. For some reason some of the files imported as stereo (which I wanted) and some imported as mono even though I never made any changes to my camera. When I put the clips on my timeline I switched all of them to 'stereo' format, but when I export the file as an H.264 quicktime movie, the audio reverts back to the way it was originally on the clips. The clips that imported as mono play as mono, and the ones that imported as stereo, play as stereo.
I've tried things like switching the project default audio to stereo and even surround sound, but nothing seems to be working and I'm really at a loss. All I want is for my whole quicktime video is to have stereo sound where channel 1 article comes out the left speaker and channel 2 audio comes out the right speaker.

Did that, there's audio on both channels. Channel one is audio from a headset microphone and channel two is audio from the shotgun mic on the camera. I should be more clear, when I play it back in the timeline, everything sounds the way I want it. The channel 1 audio is only coming out of the left speaker, the channel 2 audio is only coming out of the right speaker, which is what I want. When I export, some of the clips revert to dual mono and I can hear a mix of channel 1 and channel 2 coming out of both speakers.

Export Sounds Completely Different Than What Is Heard Before Mixdown

Hey everyone,
So I've been recording a band as of recent and been starting to understand the in's and out's of GarageBand. However, I can't seem to figure out why this is happening.
I've been working on one song (all tracks except the drums are real instruments captured through line-in) and finally got it sounding the way I want it. When I go to export and listen to it, it sounds the complete opposite. Awful thumps and enough peaking to blow any speaker. This only happens when I export. When it's in GarageBand, it sounds great.
Hopefully someone can help me out!
-Noah

Plus: GB is sort of tolerant towards clipping at playback - it will sound okay even if the meters hit the ceiling. But once exported, the clipping is a pain to the ears. (This probably has to do with the fact that GB's internal representation works with more bits than the exported file.)
So: Watch your meters!

Photos in Library module and after export look different than in Development module

Hello,
I experience a problem.
After I update photos in the Development module, the updates seem not to be shown in the Library module. And when I subsequently export to Flickr, Flickr is also showing the original photo, not the adapted one.
I noticed this the first time after making Blacks a bit deeper, causing a sunflower to become a deeper yellow. I thought that my adaptations were not applied in the Library module. After I checked with cranking down the Saturation all the way back (to almost black-and-white), that adaptation WAS applied in the Library view. So it had to be something else, causing the same color difference between the Library and Development modules.
When I switch from the Library module to the Development module, I see a slight delay in applying my changes, but they are applied. Before they are applied, I can see that the original photo is shown and that looks the same as in the Library module and on Flickr.
The photostrip on the bottom of the Lightroom screen also shows the original photos only, unless I go to the development module and select a photo (adaptations are applied in the photostrip after I select the photo, not before).
After I played a bit more in the Development module, I found something strange in the Camera Calibration menu of the Development module. The Adobe Profile (my default) caused an obvious color difference between the Library (less saturated) and the Development (more saturated) modules. The Camera Standard profile also showed a (very) slight difference, but I was unable to notice the differences using the other profiles.
So I was thinking (but it's only a guess), that the profiles are not applied in the Library view and on export, but they are in the Development module?
I use Lightroom 5.6, Camera RAW 8.6.
Please help me, as this is very annoying. I currently cannot export my photos to Flickr or anywhere else, unless I overcompensate before exporting. And I really don't want to do that. My Lightroom photo is my perfect photo, and I want to keep it that way...
Many thanks in advance for any help,
Peter

Hi ssprengel,
Thanks for your reply. Let me react to each possibility you mention and provide some extra information.
- "Check your Export / File Settings / Image Format and make sure they are set to JPG not Original". Done that, it's not on Original, but on jpg. This would not explain why I see the difference in the Library and Development modules, by the way. But better to know for sure.
- "...the most likely thing that is wrong is your color-management on your computer is not working properly". It is a PC with Windows 7. I have been using Lightroom for maybe 6 years and I never had this problem before. The last time I changed my setup is more than a year ago and this problem only started to happen a short while ago (after the update to Lightroom 5.6? I'm not sure, but that's the only thing that has changed lately). I use a Spider to create a custom profile that is correct for my setup and do a regular update on the profile.
- "what brand and model of monitor do you have?" I have an EIZO FlexScan S2411W and use that for a long time as well. I chose this brand of monitors for its good color reproduction and I have been happy with it for years now.
What I am not getting is why would all this show a difference between the Library and Development module? The only difference is the Lightroom software that is switching from one module to another, and that should deliver the same photo. I'm also stating in my first post that the differences are very noticeable using the Adobe Standard Camera Profile in the Development module. I have a feeling that the profile is part of the problem.

Quicktime export is different than what's in the timeline

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for