Quicktime PRO-RES 422 Files... What is the best format for output in Adobe Premier?

I have recently enrolled on a university film makers course and up until this point i have been a Windows user. At the university everyone uses Final Cut Pro as this seems to be the standard software, at least at my level. My question is this; I have a bunch of Quicktime Pro-Res 422 files and i was wondering what would be the best Adobe Premier preset to export it as, In order to achieve the best quality possible?
Jak.

I have a bunch of Quicktime Pro-Res 422 files and i was wondering what would be the best Adobe Premier preset to export it as, In order to achieve the best quality possible?
You're going to have to clarify this a bit more. Do you have ProRes files you want to edit with in Premiere? If so, you don't need to convert them--as long as you have QT installed, you can edit them, even on a PC.
Or are you saying that you've already edited, and now you want to do a final export for viewing, or for editing elsewhere?

Similar Messages

I won a logo contest and want to send the customer the best printable file. what is the best format for vector images?

I have a simple 3-color graphic logo design and i cant remember the best way to send a file for print/t-shirts/web stuff?

Nowadays it's mostly PDF.
Depending on which service provider will get it, it might also be EPS.
When you want to stay in business you should definitely brush up on some of the basics of the trade maybe using this for a start:
Adobe publishes a new Creative Suite 5/5.5 Printing Guide - Rufus Deuchler

The best format for output

Hi All,
working in animation project to be broadcasted on a TV channel as HD1080 50i,
1- all the animation layers was rendered from TOONBOOM as .SWF to keep it in vector for compositing issue.
Dose SWF lose any quality? we always use TGA sequence with alpha in our past SD projects but now we found SWF is a smaller file size and allows zooming Because it keeps all vector lines.
2- compositing each scene in after effects cs6 and then render them.
What is the best format for output to deal with premiere cs6 as a real time playback ( my editing pc includes gtx680 4gb., many HGST 3tb with raid controller,64g ram, aja kona 3g) so do I go with TGA sequence (I think it will destroy the raid Because of the large number of small-sized files in read and write ) or MOV uncompressed (I'm afraid of the space size and don’t know it will play in real time ) or what is the best compressed format Maintaining video image quality as its now will be my only master source?
Many thanks,
sherif

Thanks Rick for your reply,
Regarding the SWF i moved to flash pro forums and they are supporting me now,
My system is a pc, win.64, I7-3930K, 64G RAM, EVGA GTX680 4G, Many HGST 3TB with raid controler,
Some advised me to go with Quicktime Prores HQ or DNXHD or DPX ,
In this year project my client's requirement for delivery is :
DNxHD 120 Codec, wrapped with QuickTime rapper, which means a file with MOV extension and the codec used is DNxHD 120 ( 1080@50i HD)
So do i work with dnxhd 120 from the beginning to the delivery? (and it will be my only master source) or another format encode it at the end to dnxhd 120? ( i will distribut this project to many channels after the first run exclusivity period end with different requirements).
Thanks,
Sherif

Adobe v. Apple - Flash v. H.264 - what's the best format for web?

So the iPad doesn't support flash. I guess that means that if I upload my projects as flv's or f4v's and use a flash player then the apple obsessed people won't be able to watch my videos
http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/05/02/apple-vs-adobe-is-flash-dying/
Personally, I don't really care if flash lives or dies. I just want to be able to publish videos that anyone can watch in a player that anyone can use without having to download a plugin. SO, what is the best format to use?
To date, I've been shooting my footage in HD 1920x1080i, saving my PE projects as MPEG2 HD 1080i, and then converting to f4v's. Now I'm wondering if I should be saving them using the H.264 preset instead and then presumably some lower quality settings for the web file? And if so, what kind of end user player should I be looking for?
Help anyone?

Well, unfortunately Flash was the universal format, and then Steve Jobs decided that he did not like Adobe. As most browsers on Earth were FLV playback enabled and if not, were only a quick, free download away. Now, it seems that Apple's devices will only work with flavors of MOV. One can still download and install Apple's QT Player (though several recent versions did not work well with Adobe programs - Steve Jobs sabotage?).
Instead of coming together on universal formats/CODEC's, it seems that many wish to fragment the market to support just their products. One is at the mercy of these hardware and software companies. Producers probably should now do several versions of everything, if they wish to cover all bases. Someone will have to download and install something.
Good luck,
Hunt

What is the best format for a master?

Hi,
I am about to send my master for replication. Can anybody tell me what is the best format I should save my songs into? I want to avoid any complains that my CD is not "compatible" with someone's CD player.
Also, any pointers on how to burn my master CD (slowest speed, etc.) to get the best sound quality I can get from Logic Pro?
As always, thank you sooo much. :>
Anya

Hi,
Your master should be dithered (assuming you started off in 24bit) to 16bit and 44.1 - which is cd quality. Whether it is in aiff. or wav before you burn to CD is not an issue.
As for the CD itself - use Waveburner to burn the master disk as this burns it to red book compliant quality. In regards to the speed - i tend to burn cd's at 4x as a sound guy friend a fw years ago informed me this would reduce the possibility of errors on a burned cd. If you want to be sure burn it slower even!
The most important thing is to bounce your tracks down to 44.1 and use Logic's dithering options when making the tracks 16bit too.
Hope that helps,
Rounik

What is the best format for ripping CD's to get the best quality?

I'm sure this has been asked before but I wanted to see what was the latest thinking. Any ideas of the additional Hard Drive usage? Thanks

mysteryroach wrote:
My questions are: What are the best settings for ripping cd's in the AAC format?
It is a matter of opinion, but I suggest 256 kb/s, CBR, and leave all other settings on automatic.
Will I be able to burn cd mixes with the tracks I import into itunes after importing using the AAC format?
Yes. Just put them in a playlist and burn.
Does the AAC format have VBR like the MP3 format?
Yes. You will see it as an option in the Import Settings.
Is there other ripping software such as dbPoweramp and Exact Audio Copy that does a better job ripping cd's in the AAC format?
EAC does a better job of correcting errors in damaged CDs, but for normal CDs iTunes does a fine job of ripping to AAC.

What is the best format for a image with transparency?

If I create an image in PhotoShop with Transparency, what is the best format and size to save it in for it to work in FCE?

Did that link help you?
Thanks Tom.
The link helped.
FCE kept crashing when I put the image on the time line and I figured out that it probably had to do with the size of the image that I was using. It was 4656x3400 and CMYK.
Once I reduced it and changed to RGB it worked.
Love your new book!

What's the best format for archiving for future hi res?

Hello,
I've got FCP 6 running on OS X 10.6.8.
If I upgrade the system I'll have to upgrade FCP and will lose a lot of my old video files in the process (at least it'll take a LOT of work to get them back to the way they were.)
So I'd like to save my videos in the best resolution for future use. At this point I've only got copies for hi res YouTube and standard res DVDs.
In the future I might want to go to Blu Ray or whatever else is current. What's the best file type to save them out as?
Also, should I do this through Compressor or straight from FCP 6?
I know hard drives fail, so what would also be the best way to store them? Thumb drives? Data DVDs?
Thanks.

Neal Fox wrote:
... I know hard drives fail, so what would also be the best way to store them? Thumb drives? Data DVDs?
All media can fail ... my first home-made DVDs were killed just by letting them lay in the bright sunlight for 20 minutes ...
So, aside 'future-proof codecs', for long-term strorage a smart back-up-strategy is essential.
And here come hard-drives back again into the game:
to copy/clone a hard-drive, you simply drag the content from Drive#A to Drive#B - done. (no need to watch the time-bar grow...)
to copy 'disks' ... that is a more complex procedure... not to mention, a disk doesn't fit as much data as a drive, so you have to repeat that steps multiple times.
There are no numbers avail about non-mechanical storage media (sticks, SDcrads, SSDs) on the log run...I 'killed' several sticks and SDcards, just by using them.-
Magnetic media ... hmmm, older audio-tapes got rust; a German manufacturer (BASF) got 'famous' in the late 60ies for using the wrong 'glue', so the iron particles felt off from the plastics after some decades of storage..
Finally, 'hardware' - anybody remembering SCSI? 5 1/4" floppies?? MO-drives? ................. (firewire < chuckle> )
You can actually read a 500y old Gutenberg Bible, but in 50y, most of our 'data' is gone, poof, nirvana....
(no, I'm not grumpy )

What is the best format for iMovie imports

Hi There,
I am trying to convert some home movies to iMovie on my mac the movies are on DVD in VLC> VTS files. What is the best file available on Xilisoft video converter Ultimate for best quality in iMovie please.
so many choices but none specifically for iMovie.
cheers

I don't seem to have DV or AIC as an option! Nor M-JPEG.
What is available depends on which converter you are trying to use. iSquint, for instance, will only convert to MPEG4/AAC or H.264/AAC. A converter like MPEG Streamclip, on the other hand, will convert to DV, AIC, M-JPEG, Photo-JPEG, MPEG-4, or H.264 but requires the $20 QT MPEG-2 Playback component to work on VOB files.
Also, although my VOB file is about 15mins, when I enter it in my converter it comes up as 2 seconds in the 'Duration' column. Why?
This is a common problem with MPEG-1/2 files. Usually it stems from timecode breaks. Such breaks are ignored by many non-Mac multi-media players but not by applications relying on the QT structure which synchronizes tracks "temporally" rather than spatially as with "multiplexed" GOP files or interleaved tracks. Once again, this is why I prefer MPEG Streamclip for converting such files. It includes a "fix timecode" option ("Command-F") to correct these breaks.

What is the best format for my photos?

I am working in a template on IPages and want to import photos. This template will eventually be turned into a PDF with many pages. I'm wondering what is the best photo format to use for the pdf to load quickly; speed is the priority here. The photos will not be very large in the template - about 2"x2" at most. Right now my photos are png's and jpgs.
thanks!

If they are color photo like images then jpegs are the best, you can vary their quality and resolution to keep them small, cropping them to exactly what you see in the layout also helps.
.png are good where you have a transprent background but they are bigger.
If you have vector (drawn lines and shapes + text) design then .pdfs are best, particularly if they are flat color.
Peter

What is the best format for HDV video for a computer playback

Hello guys,
I have made a very nice HDV video and after the frustration and awful results with compression for
SD DVD, I have decided just to export that video as a file, put that file on DVD, so people can just pop that DVD into their computers, copy that file on their HD and play it. (so there is no compression needed for over internet data transfer, Bit Rates for space, etc). The video is
HDV 1080i 60. If I export it from FCP as a QT Movie the quality is beautiful. But when being watched on the computer screen, there are those interlace lines visible, when any faster motion in the video occurs. So I am wondering, what would be the best export option in order to provide best qualities for computer playback. Would it be some of those QT progressive modes, like 1080 p24? Or any other?
Thank you for your help.
Cheers,
K.

Chris Walsh1 wrote:
Why are you using FCP 6.02? Why didn't you do the update to 6.04?? I did, and I am having tons of issues
That is pretty much the reason. It is fresh out the gate and so far untested. I am not an early adopter of any new technology (soft or hardware wise). I like to wait it out and see what other peoples' experience is. A bit of a prickish way to put it is: "In Chess, the pawns go first." (I'm a big Chess nerd -- I have Chess analogies for just about everything).
But even if the latest FCP, OS X and QT versions were humming along without any reported issues by the "power users" (by that I mean people who are editing on their systems 40+ hours a week in a professional capacity) I still wouldn't have upgraded because I am in the middle of three projects.
Well, that isn't entirely the truth. I started all three projects on a PowerMac G4 running OS X 10.4.11 and FCP 5.1.4. In the midst of this I started an across-the-board upgrade -- new computer, monitor, OS and FCS. But what I did (am still doing) is migrating from one to another and testing the performance on the new one before committing. In doing my research before hand, I see that the magic cocktail for stability appears to be OS X 10.5.2, FCP 6.0.2 and QT 7.4.5 so I built my new MacPro to that and stayed there. I have migrated all my current projects to the new system and have been putting the new setup to the test and is passing at every turn, so I feel confident I can work on this new system and will be retiring the PowerMac soon, but throughout this process I always had my stable G4 setup available so I wouldn't risk losing any work.
Might the reason the video you compressed "looked great" be because you didn't do the update?
Maybe, but I can't say with any certainty.
In the old compressor, I had no problems (in earlier versions of my project) compressing the video. It always looked GREAT! In 3.03, I get weird issues that don't make sense to me at all.
In the older version of compressor, this never happened. Even on this project.
Then I would think the update is the likely culprit.
Here is what I would like to try as my final attempt. I just bought yet ANOTHER computer. A Mac Pro/Two 2.8GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeo. I'd like to try to load Final Cut Studio on this machine, but where should I stop my upgrading? What is good stable working system for everyone??
OS X 10.5.2, FCP 6.0.2 and QT 7.4.5 is working great for me, and it appears for others here as well. I am running a new octo-2.8GHz Mac Pro.

What's the best format for a movie to be in a site and be viewed by a PC?

I created a temporary web site using GoLive. I imported a short movie in 2 different versions (1 medium for DSL/Cable and 1 small for Dial-up). When I tested the site either in Explorer or Safari on different Mac computers at home, they both loaded and played OK. However, none of the videos show the bottom bar where the start/stop/volume control appears. Also noticed in a PC that the video had a broken link.
I created a link for QT for Windows so that any PC would be able to download for Free (I don't know if that's the answer).
Is there a universal format that could be saved or exported in QT for PC viewers?
And, why my movies don't show the control bar at the bottom?
The movies were exported as a QT ".mov" Streaming Medium and Low. You can visit: http://www.warreninstitute.com to check them out.
I'd really appreciate if anybody would suggets a better way of handling these short movies.
Thank you!
-sal
G3, G4, G5, iMac G4 Mac OS X (10.4.4)

Avoid H.264 video codec (default in many presets) so older versions of QuickTime can view your files. Use MPEG-4 or H.263 or Sorenson 3 instead.
The reason your controller isn't showing is because you've (probably) didn't allow for it in the movie dimensions. A 320X240 .mov file would become 320X256 (16 pixels for the controller).
Make sure you're using the proper "tags" (object and embed) in your page code.
More info here:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=61011
No need for "streaming" (hint tracks) in your movies. They are only used by special software if your files are served from streaming servers. Your files download and the hint tracks only add to the file size and are not needed.

What's the best format for your harddrive

I'm formating my external drive to use as my primary scatch disk for use with only a Mac not PC and wondered what the differences are between the foramts? For example is Mac OS extended better or worse that Mac Os extended (journaled) I'm a tad confused.
Much Thanks, Mungo

A Journaled disk has a file on it which records changes made to the Mac OS X System folder
This is not entirely true. Journaling is a technique that helps protect the integrity of any and all data on a disk. When you enable journaling, a continuous record of changes to all files on the disk is maintained in the journal. If your computer stops because of a power failure or some other issue, the journal is then used to restore the disk to a known-good state when the system is restarted
Why then would you ever not want journaling turned on? Well, with video applications you are usually eking out the absolute maximum performance of your storage system, and in simple terms, writing to the journal means your system is not writing video data ... so you are not getting that maximum performance. The hit is not really significant for most situations, but where data access is really is key then switching off journaling may be worth it.
journalling is not able to recover a video file for example, that was accidentally erased.
heck no, but it can prevent corruption of existing data if and when the drive access is unexpectedly interupted.
if anyone is really interested you can check out the nitty gritty of Apple's journaled file system implementation in their tech note document at http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2355

What is the best format for DVD studio Pro when you have a lot of content?

I have to make a SD DVD and I have a lot of content trying to fit as much as possible on one DVD yet still maintain the quality. I made a beautiful h.264 to find out that it isn't compatible. Suggestions..
Message was edited by: jennafwd

How long is your program? How many menus do you plan to have?
Have you used one of the DVD presets in Compressor to create the needed .m2v video file and AC3 audio file for use in DVD-SP? If so, which preset? If you customized a preset, what bit rate settings did you use?
-DH

What is the best format for a new video editing hard drive?

Hello,
I would like to know how to properly format a new 2 TB Hitachi hard drive that I have for my early 2008 Mac Pro that will be installed in drive slot 3. Information at the following link explains that:
"Journaling is essential for OS disks (boot drives), but for disks used for video media, used for editing purposes, Journaling is not advised, as it can affect the speed of data being written. For video media (scratch) drives you would want to select the Mac OS Extended, no journaling."
"Journaling only affects the speed of either writing to or modifying a file, it has no effect on the read speed of files. If you're writing a lot of data, for for a long period of time, like capturing video, the write speed of the data will slow down, as the Journaling record keeps updating it's self."
http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/formatting_hd_macstone.html
My question is, is this information legit and should I format my new hard drive using Mac OS Extended? I will be using it solely for the purpose of reading and writing HDV and AVCHD video files using Final Cut Pro 7.
Thanks
Tom

Hi there,
Ive always followed the idea that journalling is turned off, so I would follow the advice given and turn journalling off.
In addition I would also make that drive "private" to spotlight so it doesn't search or catalogue there.
If its of interest, I've always formatted my drives in the following way
make 2 partitions,
partition 1 - make this about 10% of the drives capacity and label DO NOT USE
partition 2 - make this the remainder of the capacity
the reason being (So Im told by the drive gurus) is that the first sector contains the volumes boot block - this can get corrupted/damaged so having it partitioned like this means you can erase it safely whilst keeping your media.
Ive followed this for years and it has worked on the few occasions a drive has misbehaved.
cheers
Andy

Quicktime PRO-RES 422 Files... What is the best format for output in Adobe Premier?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for