Quicktime x displaying incorrect aspect ratio

Hi,
I have a strange display issue with QT X which is occurring on both my MacBook Pro and Mac Pro.
Quicktime X is displaying all movies in a squashed aspect ratio. For example a 640x360 movie is displayed (actual size setting) as 640x340. The same movie displays correctly in QT 7 Pro. The same movie also displays in the correct aspect ratio in iTunes.
What QT X appears to be doing is displaying the images squashed by 20 pixels. for instance a 1920x1080 actually displays as 1920x1060. The image is not trimmed just squashed into a frame that is 20 pixels too short. It happens with all movies including ones downloaded from Apple.
any ideas anyone?
Thanks

Are other people are encountering this distortion?
I'm not and I routinely convert and proof 4 to 12 files a day as part of my processing activities. In addition, neither test files download from the trailers area nor files sent me for examination seem to display this aberration.
I wonder if it is something to do with the transport commands moving from underneath the frame to within the picture area.
Not sure what you are referring to here. If referring to the controls which are visible when the cursor is hovering above the player window, they have nothing to do with changes in the display dimensions as detailed by the "Inspector" window on a properly functioning system.
I'm not sure this is the issue
Have explained the basic mechanism governing the normal display of files played in the local players. Basically, either the problem is in the file itself or the problem is in the manner in which good files might be playing in a corrupted or software conflicted player. Comparing playback under different user accounts or on different systems might reveal if the problem is local to your account and/or system. If you don't have a secondary system available locally, posting a test file for comparison by others might determine the problem source.

Similar Messages

  • Incorrect aspect ratio of display to monitor ?

    I was wondering if this has happened to anyone else;  I completed a website
    and the client said that she had heard from a friend that her site looked distorted and no others did. She will not give any information as to the person, the machine, browser - anything. I tested the site on IE, Firefox, Safari and Chrome. I tested it on a variety of resolutions, on PCs and Macs. I went to Best Buy and proceeded to test the site on 20 different computers. The only way I could get a distorted view was changing the resoluton to an aspect ratio that was out of line with the monitors aspect ratio. ALL websites looked distorted then, but I am being told that this person reports that only mine is. As there is no way I can verify this finding, I am wondering if this has happened to anyone else. The client won't pay until this is resolved.
    The site in question is www.alexandraduran.com. It is pretty straight forward although it has some quirks due to client request (against advice).
    Thanks for any answers, guesses or suppositions.

    Thanks for both your comments. I agree on the height - particularly
    in the menus - it causes it not to work at all on an iphone for example. P
    art of the problem on this site were some restrictions becuase the client wanted to maintain the site herself and a good
    bit of the design editing lent itself to code "I hae me doots" about. The menu fix is a quick one on the style sheet but I am concerned that both of you found errors. The code validated in Dreamweaver CS4,the platform I wrote it in. So ... I couldn't find the errors. I also didn't see any "errors on page" messages while running it live. Where should I be looking ?
    Thanks for your efforts.
    Regards,
    Kurt

  • Quicktime X and 7 aspect ratio problems

    I have scoured the net and not come up with a single solution to this issue.
    I have hundreds of music videos, home videos etc in Quicktime 7 format. The ratio of these files varies at a pixel level, but are corrected in Q7 size feature.
    It's not just an anamorphic issue, as many videos are cropped from a non anamorphic 4:3 'letter boxed' source.
    Now QX does not display them correctly at all, which until recently wasn't the end of the world, but from the last update, iTunes began using the X ratio as opposed to the correct adjusted ratio, so music videos in iTunes, QX, the iPad, you name it, the videos created this way do not display correctly.
    That basically is every video on my Mac created from the late 90's to recently.
    Any ideas, solutions? How on earth can Apple do something so amateurish, and why is there no major uproar.

    So what you're saying is, Apple are telling me "thank you for your loyalty in using our hardware since 1988, and building up a video collection based on our software, but we've decided to do a version of Quicktime that ignores the size tag you have being using for the last 14 years (I started video work on Quicktime in 1997), and screw any videos you did to this point, unless they had square pixels?"
    Not exactly. I believe that what they are saying is that QT is growing old. The technology on which is is based was fine for the codecs and techniques of its time, but video technology is constantly changing and it is no longer practical or possible to keep making updates and patches that don't, in and of themselves, create new, more serious problems than they solve. QT X is based on technology designed to make this process of evolution easier and it is likely we will see many new changes over the coming decade. However, in the meantime, they have not done away with QT 7 or Front Row, both of which continue to display your files correctly even under Snow Leopard. I personally continue to use QT 7—mainly because I have it keyed for "Pro" use and prefer its functionality to the what I call "Not quite ready for prime time" version represented by QT X which likely appeals to first time Mac users.
    New videos are fine, I just encode them to square pixels anyway and ignore any PAR nonsense at the encode stage, but then if the PAR value is what they are using now, why not allow an option in QX to set that, so at the very least I could resize the old videos to correct format.
    Not sure if Apple would be willing to provide what amounts to developmental support for an application they are phasing out. Still, it wouldn't hurt to ask. If enough people should request such an enhancement, they might be willing to at least consider the possibility.
    Re-encoding them is just not an option, incurring further loss, on videos that in some cases are already marginal.
    While I stated that corrections are normally made during the encoding process, it isn't the only method of setting the PAR value. Unfortunately, it is the most accurate method.
    My point with anamorphic is that it will simply change 4:3 to 16:9 if there were some option to hit a check button.
    Actually, using modern encoders, you can utilize any custom PAR setting desired but I am usually more interested in other aspect ratios like 1.66:1, 1.85:1, 2.40:1, and 2.35:1 since most of my work is centered on the conversion of movies for use on my TV devices.
    More flexibility is needed, especially from a platform that is supposed to be pro. Ever tried formatting videos for a vertically placed Plasma for exhibition work, on a video file that isn't square pixel?
    Not as uncommon as you might think. I also layer over still or video backgrounds to frame the main video and fill the unused device display area.
    I have videos for example that are 800 x 400 (due to an original source, or a crop from the source, but view at 4:3 with the size setting, as they should. Now they look ridiculous displaying at 2:1, and there is no way to change it.
    I would normally employ masking here to avoid one level of re-compression.
    The size option allowed it to be displayed as you wanted it to, after encode.
    More importantly, the Size (Scale) option allowed you to avoid having to re-encode the file since it can be saved back to the original file container (assuming no other changes were made the forces a re-encoding of the file).
    It worked, it was done as Apple wanted, due to the size option being the only way to do to non-square pixels, and now they say, nah, we're not doing that anymore?
    You seem to be forgetting that when QuickTime was initially introduced almost 20 years ago, users did not have to worry about scalability options, low-compression, high data rate broadcast standards or anamorphic DVDs because there weren't any such work flows for the Apple/Mac platforms of that era nor could they handle them anyway.
    So basically Quicktime now contains no ability to format non-square pixels, unless it is done at the encode?
    True, but as hinted previously, Apple and QuickTime isn't the only game in town. Based on your question, I went back and played around with Subler. Had been told that this app would allow the user to embed PAR value but was never able to get it to work. Finally managed to get a 720x480 (636x480) encoded movie trailer to play back as an 852x480 display in both QT 7 and QT X on my Snow Leopard system. This proves that it can be done without re-encoding, but there do seem to be some limitations. For instance, since I normally encode using macro-block 16 dimensions increments and Subler seems to like increments of 12 pixels, some PAR and Size target values may vary by 4 pixels. In any case, you may want to Google the app and give it a try. You still have to process each file but not actually re-compress the data.
    It is barely believable that they would do that.
    Please excuse me, but I do have to chuckle here. It seems as if you feel that Apple has taken something away from you. I, on the other hand, tend to view it as not missing something I never really had. I do, however, agree that it would be nice if both applications were able to access/change both PAR values and display size values for better compatibility between old and new technologies.

  • 16:9 Apple TV export playing with incorrect aspect ratio in iTunes.

    Hi, I've exported a 16:9 PAL movie from FCP using 'Export for Apple TV' which plays fine in Quicktime (1024x576 m4v file), my problem is when I import it into iTunes it changes the aspect ratio to 720x576. If I 'show in Finder' and play the iTunes import using Quicktime it plays fine (1024x576).
    So it seems a problem with iTunes?
    If anyone else has fixed this problem I'd love to know how.
    Many thanks,
    Dave

    For anyone interested...
    I've been in contact with Elgato http://www.elgato.com/elgato/int/mainmenu/home.en.html
    regarding this as they are part of this issue.
    They have confirmed that there is a bug in the latest releases of iTunes that is causing the problem.
    They have been communicating their information to Apple but have had little response to date.
    Maybe we'll get a fix when Apple could be bothered.

  • Video With Incorrect Aspect Ratio

    I am currently using EyeTv and exporting the video to itunes using the apple tv preset since I want to use itunes as my video library manager. When I watch it in itunes it appears that it is trying to fit a 16:9 aspect ratio onto the 4:3 monitor, but it plays correctly when watch it using quicktime. Is this a bug, is there a different setting I need to use, or do I have to export the video using different settings. There wasn't an issue using using the 7.5 version but even after the 8.0.1 it still is there. Any ideas? Thanks.

    Just learned to export from eyetv using the h264 setting and upgrading to handbrake 0.92

  • Export to Quicktime Movie Results in Aspect Ratio Distortion

    All of my original footage was shot in miniDV. I have created a sequence with the following settings:
    Frame size: 720 x 480
    Compressor: DV/DVCPRO - NTSC
    Pixel Aspect: NTSC - CCIR 601
    Vid rate: 29.97 fps
    Ultimately the sequence needs to go to DVD with a standard 4:3 aspect ratio. To export, I am using:
    File > Export > QuickTime Movie...
    I have tried using several different settings including:
    Apple Pro Res 422 NTSC 48 kHz
    Apple Pro Res 422 NTSC (HQ) 48 kHz
    Apple Pro Res 960x720 30p 48 kHz
    DV NTSC 48 kHz
    etc...
    All settings yield the same result: a slightly squeezed aspect ratio. At first, I thought that this might simply be the fact that I was playing back files in QuickTime which uses square pixels I believe. But in both DVD Studio Pro and iDVD, the simulation shows the same effect. (By the way, Finder's "Get Info" reads the resulting Final Cut Pro Movie File dimensions 720x486.)
    I'm fairly new to FCP so I'm hoping there is something obvious that I have missed. Can anyone explain what I need to do to get the video to DVD without a distorted aspect ratio?
    (Incidentally, I have managed to export using quicktime conversion with no problem. But I need the export to be a Final Cut Pro Movie File so as to maintain chapter markers, etc.)
    Advice welcome!!!

    Hi David, I know this was discussed in you posting already but I just wanted to make sure I had it clear. I have a 4:3 film and I've exported as a quicktime movie with current settings, which should be 4:3 and found that the image when played back in quicktime, looks horizontally stretched. Almost as if quicktime is trying to play it back as a 16:9 image. I think this is the same issue the other fellow was having but I just wanted to be clear. You're saying that the 4:3 image distortion is perfectly normal when played back in quicktime on a computer screen and that the export will look fine when put to DVD or sent to a monitor? I just wanted to make sure because this problem is freaking me out and I don't want to deliver a distorted image to my client. Could you also explain briefly why this happens with quicktime export and not quicktime conversion and what causes quicktime to distort the 4:3 image? Any advice or help would be greatly appreciated.
    Cheers,
    james.

  • Second Display's Aspect Ratio

    Hi!
    I have two HD 23" Displays
    The picture in Canvas is show correct when "Correct for Aspect Ratio" is cheked.
    But how correct it for second display ,when i turn on External Video?
    In 1440x1080 mode (or other) its show as square
    Please Help!
    Thanks!

    FCE is a resolution specific application. The formats are fixed at standard DV and standard HD frame sizes. You need FCP for this. Or you change the frame size on export and compress for the web. I assume it's for the web as no video standard uses that shape.

  • How to may a 16 x 9 quicktime play in that aspect ratio

    I've got a problem whereby quicktimes that are corrected created at 16 x 9, play in a 4 x 3 aspect
    ration screen when you open them in quicktime player.
    If there some setting I'm supposed to be changing so that the movie plays in the correct aspect ratio?
    Thanks.

    Thanks. It works! Prima!
    It's a little bit difficult for me to write and understand the English terms correctly, cause I am German.
    I did not recognize, that I had to go to the Library Module!
    Here I repeat Rikk's way in German:
    Im Bibliothek-Modul
    Rasteransicht
    Bilder selektieren
    Im Menufeld Ad-hoc Entwicklung:
    Freistellungsfaktor einstellen: 16:9

  • Keynote to quicktime movie has wrong aspect ratio

    I have created some Keynote Quicktime movies.  When I import them into iMovie, they become too tall and wide to see the pictures.  How can I change the aspect ratio (I want to use 16:9) and/or the height and width of the slides to be seen properly?

    Hi David, I know this was discussed in you posting already but I just wanted to make sure I had it clear. I have a 4:3 film and I've exported as a quicktime movie with current settings, which should be 4:3 and found that the image when played back in quicktime, looks horizontally stretched. Almost as if quicktime is trying to play it back as a 16:9 image. I think this is the same issue the other fellow was having but I just wanted to be clear. You're saying that the 4:3 image distortion is perfectly normal when played back in quicktime on a computer screen and that the export will look fine when put to DVD or sent to a monitor? I just wanted to make sure because this problem is freaking me out and I don't want to deliver a distorted image to my client. Could you also explain briefly why this happens with quicktime export and not quicktime conversion and what causes quicktime to distort the 4:3 image? Any advice or help would be greatly appreciated.
    Cheers,
    james.

  • Incorrect aspect ratio when importing MPEG-4 Video file to project

    My movie which originated from a commercial DVD, is a .m4v.ff.mov file.
    The "ff" is the software interface (ffmpegX) that converts third party Unix media.
    When I open it as a Quicktime movie it comes up in the correct 1: 2.35 aspect ratio.
    and shows an actual pixel dimension of 720 x 304.
    When I import that same file to FCP (version 5.1.4) it comes up as 720 x 480 pixels - a completely different aspect ratio. The viewer window shows the pixels to be a SQUARE format but it is grayed out.
    I was able to de-select the "show as sq. pixels" in the canvas window but it only expands it to what appears to be a 1: 1.85 aspect ratio and not the 1: 2.35 which it should be.
    Any ideas on how to fix this?
    i would greatly appreciate someone with the expertise to solve this.
    Thanks,
    Richard

    I think I figured it out for myself:
    In the Viewer window go to the "Motion' tab, go down to Aspect ratio and move the slider to the left or right to adjust the width to height relationship.
    I have no idea why this is solving the issue but it does.

  • Canvas & Viewer  displaying different Aspect Ratios

    Same footage. Original footage in viewer displaying in Letter Box in a 4:3 black area (and appearing much larger). Same footage from Timeline showing in Canvas as 16x9 black area (but not filling the entire canvas). Both are at 100%. I have tried to arrange back to defaults..no avail...Just for clarity..the viewer and the canvas are displaying/formatted for different aspect ratios. They should be the same. how do I fix it?

    The viewer will show the footage in the format it was shot in. The canvas will reflect the footage as it will show up in the timeline based on the settings of the sequence.
    My guess is that the sequence settings are set to anamorphic or some sort of 16:9 while what you actually shot is letterboxed.
    Did you shoot squeeze or letterbox?
    CaptM

  • W520 External Display Incorrect Size/Ratio

    Hi,
    I have recently ran into problems with my W520 w/ Nvidia 2000m when connecting to an ViewSonic 1920*1080 external display. I just want to clarify that I have been using this setup for about 2 month with a HDMI to Displayport connector and it have worked fine. 
    Yesterday. I plugged in my Displayport connector before I started the computer. Usually, I start then plug in once startup is complete.  After doing so, the computer started up thinking my external is the main startup display. After startup, the proportion of the display is totaly wrong. I checked my resolution, it still says 1920*1080 but it seems that my thinkpad believes that the display's ratio is maybe 4:3 or 1:1 instead of 16:9. So, basically, everything on my external is elongated so I cant see the top or bottom of my desktop. It is like my graphics card think my external display is bigger than it really is. 
    I have tried to use Nvidia resize calibration, but it actually take away pixels from 1080 down to 810. I have also deleted by nvidia drive and reinstalled with no promise.
    Any input is always appreciated and thanks in advance!

    hey dy58,
    could you uninstall all graphic drivers. let windows install its generic drivers.
    with the generic drivers install, try again your setup and see if the aspect ratio is proper.
    WW Social Media
    Important Note: If you need help, post your question in the forum, and include your system type, model number and OS. Do not post your serial number.
    Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
    If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"!
    Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!
    Have you checked out the Community Knowledgebase yet?!
    How to send a private message? --> Check out this article.

  • DVR620 incorrect aspect ratio when recording DVD or VHS

    I have a DVR620KU connected to a Sony Digital LCD Bravia TV, Sony HT-CT100 Home Theater system and a Scientific Atlantic Explorer 8300HDC cable box.  I am using HDMI cables except for the connection from the "out" on cable box to the "in" on the DVR620.   When recording from a broadcast program or DVR'd(cable box) program, the picture on the TV while recording, and the DVD or VHS recording when played back, have letterbox like bars top and bottom and the aspect ratio for the picture is stretched.  I have tried eliminating the Home Theater system, but that doesn't help.  Other than that, things work as they are supposed to, including viewing a commercially recorded DVD.
    Thanks in advance for any suggestions. 

    It does mean that the DVR620 is not the problem.
    I don't have the same cable box as yours. Mine is an Explorer 4250HDC. Even if they were same, however, I believe different cable systems will handle things differently.
    I'm on Time-Warner Cable in central NC. I have that big universal remote model URSU-8800L-TWR.
    When I press SETTINGS, I get the Settings menu. On the bottom of the screen is Quick Settings. If I press right arrow several times, I get to High Definition. The choices are AutoHD, Picture Size, Aspect Ratio, and Output Resolution. The choices for AutoHD are on/off. I'm using on.  Picture Size are Zoom, Normal, and Stretch. I am using Normal. Aspect Ratio choices are 4x3 and 16x9. I am using 4x3. Output resolution should probably be 480i for recording to the DVR620. Note that on the NBC channel currently there is letterboxing on the top and bottom. There is no distortion or stretching. I don't see a way to avoid the letterboxing.
    Part of the problem with making these changes is that they will affect all output from the cable box, so your HD signal to your TV might not be as good.

  • Exporting  small quicktime, can't preserve aspect ratio??

    I'm trying to export an HD project with a 960 x 720 pixel aspect ratio that's about 3 minutes long into a QT that's less than 10 meg.. i've done it a few different ways but i can't seem to keep it letterboxed to 16:9 even though i've checked the preserve aspect ratio box in the export with QT conversion dialogue box... sequence settings i haven't changed.. is that where i'm going wrong?? Help! needs to be submitted for festival by tomorrow!!

    If you need the final clip to be 4:3 for some reason, such as posting it to YouTube, then you can get the letterbox bars by nesting into a 4:3 sequence in FCP, or adding letterboxing in Compressor.
    However, if the clip will play natively as a QT file, iit can be 16:9 without letterboxing, which has many advantages. The dimesnions I use for this most often are 480x270 That should allow you to get your file down to size at good quality.
    Hope this helps -
    Max Average

  • QuickTime 10 in Lion Aspect Ratio Issues....

    I have a query regarding the following.
    I'm running the updated Avid MC5.5.3 on a new MBP 17i with Lion, that came with QT 10.
    Is there any reason why when I export from Avid a QT in 16 x 9, which opens in any other media player in 16 x 9, that QT 10 opens the file in 4 x 3...?
    I'd really appreciate some assistance on this, as that's quite a degree of computing power, backed up by some pretty costly software, playing video in 4 x 3.
    Any reason why this would be...?
    Advice would be much appreciated,
    Tb

    In the Preview window > top frame > middle button
    do you have correct for pixel aspect ratio checked or not?
    !http://i533.photobucket.com/albums/ee340/gogiangigo/Picture1-4.png!

Maybe you are looking for

  • Bios 1.90 on 865PE NEO2

    I am currently running bios 1.50 on my 865PE NEO2 LS with a 2.6c and it runs fine, I have it fully tweaked and two months ago when I was setting it up, it turned in the highest 3dmark 2003 score for an fx5600, all that with stock cooling and no cheap

  • Query help needed in finding max value between two columns

    I have a table as follows: -- INSERTING into TESTTABLE Insert into TESTTABLE (COLA,COL2,COLC,COLD,COLE,COLF) values ('A','4.5','AA',0.3,'AB',5.5); Insert into TESTTABLE (COLA,COL2,COLC,COLD,COLE,COLF) values ('B','1','BB',2.5,'BC',6.9); Insert into T

  • HT4168 Pages export to ePub - unwanted question marks

    When I export a Pages doc to ePub, a question mark appears at the end of every line. How can I avoid that? If I take the Export to ePub doc from Apple and export it, no problem. If I add some lines of my own at the end and then re-export, question ma

  • Issue loading Meta Data for IDoc Type WPUKSR01 in XI Integration Repository

    Hi, I want to load the Meta Data for IDoc Type WPUKSR01 in XI Integration Repository out of BI. Unfortunately, this IDoc is not available in the IDoc List. I checked in BI and the IDoc Type is available in WE60 and WE30. Also, I can load the Meta Dat

  • Can't re-install system after bootcamp

    now i cant even install the system 10.4.9 on my near new MBpro after doing a bootcamp install and restore, cant use any disk utilities except erase, which i did, before that idefrag, ipartition, wouldnt work coz the drive was stuffed up. now its real