R/3 4.7 upgrade to ECC 6.0 problem
in the phase INITPUT_PRE of PREPARE came out an error.
says that excuted a sql error
"select VERSION from SVERS" error.
I had set up the authdication of DB user host\sidadm as what it descript on the screen.
i tried to excuted the "select VERSION from SVERS" on SQL quarry.but error,
only if i excuted the sql like select VERSION from erp.SVERS and it success.(erp is the DB name)
what sould i do to change the authdication of DB use can be able to excute select VERSION from SVERS.
Regards
Jack Lee
Dear jack,
I also faced the same problem while upgrade. Please do the following :-
In SQL Server management console, go to Security--> Logins. You will find one user <SID>adm. In the properties of this user, you make the default database 'erp' instead of master. That's it.
Please try and confirm if it works.
Jitendra Tayal
Similar Messages
-
ERROR MESSAGE IN PPOME TCODE AFTER UPGRADE TO ECC 6.0
Hi Experts,
I have a question.
Recently our system went for upgrade and during testing phase we have found one issue.
Error message is appearing in PPOME transactio code after upgrade to ECC 6.0
The screen is getting defaulted to Budget section and unable to find the subtype as there are no subtypes available there and showing error message as "Fill in all required fields".
Please let me know your solution on this.
Regards,
Sekhar.Hi,
- you can deactivate the budget tab in the IMG-activity 'Hide/Show Tab Page'
(SIMG_CFMENUOHP1HFW20 alternatively use SM30 on view 'T77OCTABUS')
1. Create new entries for the following KEY:
a) Scenario OME0
b) Object type 'P', 'O', 'S'
c) Tab Page 'PBC_ORIG'
2. for each of this entries, set the 'Exclude Tab Page'-Flag.
- in case you do not want to deactivate the Budget tab:
The error occurs due to missing entries for subtypes in table T778U
for infotype 1516.
Please maintain the according subtyes you want to use if you create a
budget.
Regards,
Ana -
Error during Upgrade of ECC 6.0 to EHP5
Hi,
I'm upgrading our ECC 6.0 system to EHP5 (on SLES 11) using SAPup.
The system check is blaming the os version (please see italic text):
Result of system check:
Window "SDTExecution Intervervention required":
Determined system information:
Type of operating system: Linux X86_64
Version of operating system: 2.11.1
Type of database: SAPDB
Version of database: 7.7.07.034
ERROR: OS version 2.11.1 out of range (too low) Upgrade the operating system at least to version 2.3. before you continue.
WARNING: OS version 2.11.1 out of range (too high) If this version is released for the downward compatible kernel you are using, please ignore this warning. If not, ask SAP for an individual release of your configuration. Do not continue before SAP supports your configuration.
So the ERROR message is wrong, the WARNING is correct. It seems the upgrade tool is expecting a version between 2.3 and 2.9. How can I handle this "wrong" error message?
Best regards,
Christian
Edited by: Christian Janson on Jul 11, 2011 8:24 AMHello,
under the link:
[http://service.sap.com/instguides]
in the left tree select:
--> SAP Business Suite Applications
--> SAP ERP
--> SAP ERP 6.0
--> SAP enhancement packages for SAP ERP 6.0
--> SAP enhancement package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0
i found the following text:
SAP Enhancement Package Installation on top of SAP ERP 6.0
The standard tool to install SAP ERP Enhancement Package 5 on top of SAP ERP 6.0 is the SAP Enhancement Package Installer.
Download the latest versions of the SAP enhancement package installer (SAPehpi) guide and the SAP enhancement package installer tool.
But in the download directory the tool SAPup is mentioned.
So I'm not sure, which tool to use. Sorry.
Regards, Michael -
What are the things to be test in Portal Upgrading the ECC from 5.0 to 6.0
Hi ,
I never been as part of the ECC upgrade project. we are going to upgrade our ECC system from 5.0 to 6.0. Also we have SAP portal in the landscape. Can any body guide me for the following points related to testing the Portal once ECC upgrade is done.
What is the approach need to be followed.
What are things need to be tested.
what kind of test scripts need to be created.
Please provide your suggestions and ideas..
Thanks
vijayHi,
In Upgrade you need to do all integration testing and check all functionalities.
Thanks
Sunny -
The exact path for instguide to SAP R/3 4.6C upgrade to ECC 6.0
Hi,
Im kind of a bit confused with market place path.
Could somebody give me the precise path to the Adobe upgrade document.
of SAP 4.6C upgrade to ECC 6.0 Sr2.
Windows/MSSQL.
Thanks and Regards,
SimounHi,
try this URL:
https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700006421122006E
Regards,
Sven -
Upgrade to ECC 6.04 PHASE: MAIN_NEWBAS/PARCONV_UPG ERROR
Hi
get error in Upgrade to ECC 6.04 in downtime phase - MAIN_NEWBAS/PARCONV_UPG.
The screen says:
Checks after phase MAIN_NEWBAS/PARCONV_UPG were negative!
Last error code set: Conversion entries have been found in, see phase log for more detaile
In the SAPup.log says that:
CURRENTPHASE MAIN_NEWBAS/PARCONV_UPG
...started at 20110324123904
Using phase log file 'PARCONV.LOG'.
..finished at 20110324124157 with status ERROR CHECKING MODEFLAGS.
Error message set: 'Conversion entries have been found in, see phase log for more detaile'
...begin dialogue at 20110324124157
And in the PARACONV.ELG file says:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PARALLEL ALTER TABLES MODEFLAG RESET: RSMFCONV and RETURN CODE in RSMFCONV.DEV
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PARALLEL ALTER TABLES MODEFLAG RESET: RSMFCONV and RETURN CODE in RSMFCONV.DEV
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MVNTABS ERRORS: ddlntabs and RETURN CODE in PD990324.DEV
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 ETP111 exit code : "0"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CONVERSION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in NCONV00.DEV
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CONVERSION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in NCONV01.DEV
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CONVERSION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in NCONV02.DEV
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CONVERSION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in NCONV03.DEV
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MVNTABS ERRORS: delntabs and RETURN CODE in PL000324.DEV
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 ETP111 exit code : "0"
I look this log files ( RSMFCONV.DEV RSMFCONV.DEV PD990324.DEV NCONV00.DEV NCONV01.DEV NCONV02.DEV NCONV03.DEV PL000324.DEV ) but all of this, is exit code '0'
I don't know where is the error.
Any idea for helpme,
thanks in advise.
Sergio.
Edited by: Sergio Mazzeo on Mar 24, 2011 1:24 PM
The last lines of the PARACONV.LOG says that:
4 ETQ260 Starting batchjob "NTBUF_SYNC"
4 ETQ230 Starting RFC Login to: System = "DEV", GwHost = "LKMDEV", GwService = "sapgw00"
4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DEV", Nr="00", GwHost="LKMDEV", GwService="sapgw00"
4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
4 ETQ233 Calling function module "SUBST_START_BATCHJOB" by RFC
4 ETQ233 Calling function module "subst_start_batchjob" by RFC
4 ETQ399 JOBNAME='NTBUF_SYNC', REPNAME='RSNTSYNC', VARNAME='', BATCHHOST='LKMDEV', IV_SCHEDEVER=' '
4 ETQ234 Call of function module "SUBST_START_BATCHJOB" by RFC succeeded
4 ETQ233 Calling function module "SUBST_CHECK_BATCHJOB" by RFC
4 ETQ010 Date & Time: 20110324124156
4 ETQ234 Call of function module "SUBST_CHECK_BATCHJOB" by RFC succeeded
4 ETQ239 Logging off from SAP system
3 ETQ399 log analyse: search for '.[WT ]' in '^N......\.DEV$'
1 ETQ399 Conversion entries found:
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABL/SCMB/TREEVIEW2 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLCMS_RE_OBJ_SPC 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLCNVCDMC_PROJHIER 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOB_COND_DIFF 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOC_COND_AMT 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOC_COND_BDT 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOC_COND_DATE 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOC_COND_DIFF 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOC_COND_FMOD 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOC_LIST_COND 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOT_DATEPOS 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLGMBDGTLSTNUMBER 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLGMGRSPONSOREDOBJ 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLHRWEB_RULE_GROUP 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLT5RSOP_SCHEME 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLTCMS_PRD_FSTAT 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLTCMS_PRD_PRD_SET 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLTCMS_RE_EX_BPRL 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLTCMS_RE_EX_TYP 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLTCWB_CATT_HEADER 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLTCWB_ITEM_POOL 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLTJBR_US_ACCT_T 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLVALT_SP_VAL_SEC 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLVDDD_HEADER_COL 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
4 ETQ001 START time "No modeflag to check for"
1 ETQ206 Executing pre-phase DB specific actions.4 ETQ010 Date & Time: 20110324124157The last lines of the file PARACONV.LOG says that:
4 ETQ234 Call of function module "SUBST_CHECK_BATCHJOB" by RFC succeeded
4 ETQ239 Logging off from SAP system
3 ETQ399 log analyse: search for '^.[^WT ]' in '^N.......DEV$'
1 ETQ399 Conversion entries found:
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABL/SCMB/TREEVIEW2 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLCMS_RE_OBJ_SPC 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLCNVCDMC_PROJHIER 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOB_COND_DIFF 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOC_COND_AMT 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOC_COND_BDT 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOC_COND_DATE 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOC_COND_DIFF 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOC_COND_FMOD 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOC_LIST_COND 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLFICOT_DATEPOS 0CNVIE20110322DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLGMBDGTLSTNUMBER 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLGMGRSPONSOREDOBJ 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLHRWEB_RULE_GROUP 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLT5RSOP_SCHEME 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLTCMS_PRD_FSTAT 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLTCMS_PRD_PRD_SET 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLTCMS_RE_EX_BPRL 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLTCMS_RE_EX_TYP 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLTCWB_CATT_HEADER 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLTCWB_ITEM_POOL 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLTJBR_US_ACCT_T 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLVALT_SP_VAL_SEC 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
2 ETQ399 CONV ENTRY TBATG TABLVDDD_HEADER_COL 0CNVIE20110323DDIC
4 ETQ001 START time "No modeflag to check for"
1 ETQ206 Executing pre-phase DB specific actions.
4 ETQ010 Date & Time: 20110324124157
Can any helpme to this error. I don´t know what and where is the error. Not found this item in SAP Notes.
Thansk a lot.
Sergio. -
Best Practice in Upgrade from ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0
Dear All,
Can someone help in looking for Best practice in Upgrade from ECC 5.0 To ECC 6.0 Project from Functional FI and CO Side.
ThanksMoved to a different forum.
-
Good Afternoon Gentlemen,
I need your help understanding what's involved on a upgrade we need to perform.
Right now we have a SAP ECC 6.0 with the following components:
SAP_BASIS 701 0012 SAPKB70112
SAP_ABA 701 0012 SAPKA70112
PI_BASIS 701 0012 SAPK-70112INPIBASIS
ST-PI 2008_1_700 0004 SAPKITLRD4
SAP_BS_FND 701 0012 SAPK-70112INSAPBSFND
SAP_BW 701 0012 SAPKW70112
SAP_AP 700 0028 SAPKNA7028
WEBCUIF 700 0012 SAPK-70012INWEBCUIF
SAP_APPL 604 0012 SAPKH60412
SAP_HR 600 0090 SAPKE60090
ST-A/PI 01N_700ECC 0000
All other components are 600 or 604.
My functional team agreed with the client a upgrade for components 7.4 in order to install SAP BPC.
In my understanding, the current version is a ECC 6.0 on a NW 7.0 EHP1 (ABAP) and since we're being asked to upgrade to components 7.4, we're going to upgrade to ECC 6.0 on a NW 7.4 (we can choose the EHP freely). Is this correct?
Can you also point me the direction for the right documentation in order to do this the smoother way possible?
I thank you all in advance.
Best Regards,
Pedro GasparHi,
This is SAP Business one system admin forum. Please find correct forum and repost your discussion to get quick response.
Please close this thread here with helpful answer.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan -
Upgrade from ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0
Hello All,
I am preparing a pre-upgrade assessment for upgrade from ECC 5.0(SCP) to ECC 6.0.. I am suggesting the strategy Combined Upgrade and Unicode Conversion.
I need a template on how to prepare the pre-upgrade assessment for this upgrade..The template should also contain Impact analysis on the other application like BI 7.0, EP 7.0 and CRM 5.0..
How do I find out the Impact analysis on the other systems.Please do provide your suggestions on this.
Thank You,
Regards
Thilip KumarHi Sharad,
Thanks for your reply..Even I could not find any other added advantage that CUUC startegy can provide for systems with SCP..
@All- Sorry to ask too many questions in one thread.
One more question- What is the impact of ECC 6.0 upgrade on
1) Solution Manager 4.0
2) BI 7.0
3) EP 7.0
4) CRM 4.0
Any document in SMP which talks about the impact on SAP landscape?I could not find a tailor made documentabout Impact Analysis of ECC 6.0.
Regards
Thilip Kumar -
Upgrade from ECC 6.0 with no EHP to EHP 7
Hello,
We are planning an ERP upgrade from ECC 6.0, which has no enhancement package, to EHP 7.
Can this upgrade be done :
1. Directly to EHP7
OR
2. Do we need to first upgrade to a lower EHP, for example - to EHP 5 or 6 first, and then to EHP 7?
Thanks and Regards,
ReenaHi Reena
Yes, you can upgrade the system to ECC 6 EHP 6 or 7,
before that is any other SAP system are connected to ECC6 ?
If it is yes, Kindly refer the SAP Note, & you require to check those SAP version are supported to ECC 6 EHP 7 ?
1388258 - Version Interoperability within the SAP Business Suite
BR
SS -
Advice on upgrade from Ecc 6.0 (No enhancement pack) to EHP 7
Dear Friends
Our customer is thinking about upgrading from ECC 6.0 (No enhancement) to EhP 7. Can anybody tell me what are major efforts, steps and approx. time and precautions to consider in this case.
thanks a lot in advance
VictorHi,
SAP Library for SAP ERP on the SAP Help Portal at http://help.sap.com/erp. Choose a
release and then choose Application Help. In SAP Library, choose Business Functions (SAP
enhancement package 7 for SAP ERP 6.0) -> Business Functions in SAP ERP -> Enterprise
Business Functions -> Accounting -> Financial Supply Chain Management -> SAP Treasury
and Risk Management.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Jyoti -
Upgrade from ECC 6.0 EHP 4 to EHP 7.0 influence on SRM Add-On
Hi everyone,
We want to upgrade our ECC 6.0 EHP 4 to ECC 6.0 EHP 7. We are currently running SRM 7 EHP1 as ERP Add-On in the one-client scenario.
I have read the EHP7 Upgrade/restriction note also as the SAP Note 963000 - Usage and release of SRM as AddOn to ECC in ERP 6.0
But i did not find the information if we have to upgrade our SRM 7 EHP 1 to EHP3.
Please make this clear for me.
Best regards,
DavidYes, you will need to upgrade the SRM system to EHP3.
1951805 - Adjusted Version Interoperability for Business Suite 7i2013
1388258 - Version Interoperability within the SAP Business Suite
You can make use of the UDA tool to confirm this.
http://service.sap.com/uda
As you are upgrading the ERP system to EHP 7 which is based on NetWeaver 7.4 you will need to upgrade the other systems like SRM, BW to a supported release.
Regards
RB -
Upgrade from ECC 6.0 to NW 7.10
Hi,
I'm trying to plan ahead for our upcoming hardware replacement (3 yr lease). We are also planning for an ECC 6.0 upgrade from 4.7 Enterprise (unicode). I know that the power 6 chip has a built in decimal floating point processing which I believe will be useable with Netweaver 7.10.
Is the upgrade from ECC 6.0(a NW7.00 product?) to NW 7.10 a full upgrade or is it more like a big hot pack?
The reason I'm interested is that I would like to think I could take advantage of the Decimal Floating point processor sooner than later. The other part of the equation is that we have a BI based on NW 7.00 now.
If I can avoid purchasing another i5OS and paying for a processor activation because there is now a math feature built into the processor , I'm all for it. I would like to start planning now if the upgrade to 7.10 isn't going to be too painful.Hi Craig,
From what I heard, there would not be another major ECC release in the near future. New functions have been and will be released in "Enhancement packages" - hopefully it is not another new term to you...
NetWeaver 7.1 has been released (Q3 2007? not Q3 2008 for sure). BI folks might know whether there will be a release 7.1 or not.
Best regards,
Victor -
Upgrade to ECC 6 and workflow issues
Hello,
We have just upgraded to ECC 6 and have some issues with workflows. Each dialog step in the workflows appear in the respective agents inbox, but once they action, the workflow do no proceed further. The log shows that the step did receive the terminating events, but doesnt proceed from there.
Anyone who had similiar issues, can you please let me know how you went about overcoming this ?
Cheers,
SatishHi Satish,
Please check the agent assignment for the dialog step task. Also try by setting the task as a general task (if no particulat agents are desired).
Do let me know in case of further queries.
Regards,
Saumya -
ECC Upgrade from ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0 EHP4 - impact on XI 3.0
Hi,
We are palnning for upgrade our ECC System from ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0 EHP4. We do not have any plan of upgrade on XI, which is on XI 3.0.
After ECC upgrade please provide the impact on XI 3.0 ?
Will XI 3.0 able to work with ECC 6.0 without any change or any change is required in the XI configuration level, please specify?
Thanks.>>Will XI 3.0 able to work with ECC 6.0 without any change or any change is required in the XI configuration level, please specify?
As far as I know, no change is required in XI configuration.
Regards,
Praveen Gujjeti.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I'm not sure what the Google thing was but it was just a box with the Google symbol and it had an x at the top so I closed out of it thinking that it had nothing to do with the most visited and etc. I have restarted my computer and I still can't get
-
Before I give up on AirPort Express for good
I have two AirPort Express base stations which are behaving in exactly the same way, which is to say they won't talk to the world. Even attempting such tends to put both AirPort Admin Utility and AirPort Setup Assistant into a very bad (i.e. spinning
-
i am trying to export a slideshow from iphoto using a song from itunes. an error message comes up and say it will not export the song because itunes plus has not been enabled. how do i do that?
-
Parental Controls, Passwords, & Administrative Users
I am thinking of buying a couple MacBooks for my teenage kids. I'm pleased to see that Apple has finally added usable Parental Controls, particularly the website tracking feature. (Teenagers need to be able to go anywhere but also to realize that som
-
Colour/Color difference on imported images
I'm having quite a few problems with colour in Keynote. If I export from photoshop and then import into Keynote the colour appears washed out whereas if I copy from Photoshop into Keynote the colours appear fine. Now that's fine doing it that way but