R/3(MM) -XI- SUS Scenario Error

Hello,
I'm working on SRM Integration: R/3(MM) to SUS Scenario
Whenever i post a PO message to SUS from R/3 (MM module), I see the following error in SXMB_MONI:
ERROR:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?> <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand=""><SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category><SAP:Code area="ABAP">APPLICATION_ERROR</SAP:Code><SAP:P1/><SAP:P2/><SAP:P3/><SAP:P4/><SAP:AdditionalText/><SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global">StandardMessageFault</SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage><SAP:Stack>The application triggered an exception
</SAP:Stack><SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry></SAP:Error>
TRACE:
"An error occured within an XI interface: SLD system SNT_BS is not known Programm: SAPLBBP_BD_MAPPING_SAPXML1; Include: LBBP_BD_MAPPING_SAPXML1F1Y; Line:92 "
Can anyone help me resolve this problem ?
Thanks,
Regards,
Sridhar

Hi,
Thanks for the reply Vishnu. No i didn't create those OSS messages
I just now found the reason and resolved the problem.
Let me describe the reason for the problem:
In the SRM box, values for the "System Landscape Directory Names" (Business System Names) in the "Definition of backend systems in B2B" were not entered.
Txn : SPRO
SAP Reference IMG> Supplier Relationship Manager>Supplier Self Services>Technical Settings>Define Backend Systems.
Regards,
Sridhar

Similar Messages

MM-SUS Scenario---Error while posting the PO in SUS System from R/3 system.

Hi All,
An error occurred within an XI interface: Exception occurred:BBP_PD:004 -Partner 0000003000 not found E:BBP_PD:147 -Enter a country for partner 0000003000 with type 'Sold-to Party' Programm: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP; Include: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002; Line: 57
The above is problem occurred in SUS system. I have checked the message SXMb_MONI Tcode for XML message.
Can any one suggest what could be the problem and the solution for the same.
we are working on MM-SUS scenario (Plan Driven Procurement).
Thanks
Jagan

Hi
Please go through the links below ->
purchase order doesn't create in srm sus
purchase order not create in sus
Enter a country for partner with type 'Sold-to Party'
BBP_BUPA_SUPPLIER:101
Unable to determine logical system of sender
Help MM-SUS!
SUS-MM:PO not transferred to SUS--message:'sold to party'
Error in SUS PO creation
Re: PO error in SUS-MM Scenario
Cancellation from SUS hangs in XI interface
Regards
- Atul

MM-SUS Scenario---Error in R/3 IDOC when i change the Quantity in SUS

Hi All,
I have changed the PO quantity in SUS and then send the PO acknlowledgement to MM. I could see the idoc as error with the following message...
error message: Acknowledgment for PO item PO number 100 and item 00010 contains quantity variance.
Can any one suggest what needs to be done to rectify the above issue.
Thanks in advance...
Regards,
Jagan

Hi,
See these related threads:
Tolerance Check for Price Variance is not working
Re: Update PO data with those of POR by vendor from SUS
Re: Tolerance range
Re: Tolerance in SRM and ECC (BE R/3)
Also see these OSS notes:
496901 Tolerance check - back-end service PO with/without limit
835073 Enhancement of the tolerance checks
873172 Price variance: Check on percentage limits is inaccurate
1068470 SUS-MM: Processing of PO response for rejected items
1002607 IMS monitor: quantity variance exception - not able to post
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

Error in invoice posting in MM-SUS scenario

Dear Experts,
I have configured MM-SUS scenario with SRM5.0, PI7.0 and ECC5.0. The invoice is coming from the SUS system but not getting posted in R/3 because of following error u201CA company code cannot be determined for LS SRM_V1u201D. (SRM_V1 is the vendor)
I have done following invoice settings as mentioned in config guide:
Tcode: OBCA
Partner Type: LS
Partner No.: SR5CLNT300 (SUS client)
Comp. code name in invoice: SRM & Company Ltd.
CoCd: SRM1 (company code maintained in R/3)
Tcode: OBCD
Partner Type Partner No.     Tax Type     Tx
LS        SR5CLNT300     V0     V0
LS        SR5CLNT300     V1     V1
LS        SR5CLNT300     V2     V2
LS        SR5CLNT300     V3     V3
LS        SR5CLNT300     V4     V4
LS        SR5CLNT300     V8     V8
LS        SR5CLNT300     V9     V9
Tcode: OMRY
Partn.Type: LS
Partner no.: SR5CLNT300
Company Code: SRM1
Invoice doc.type: RE
Cred.memo doc.type: RE
Any help in this regards will be appreciated.
Regards,
Ashish

The invoice was successfully posted. I have done 2 thing:
1) I got implemented User Exit: EXIT_SAPLMRMH_011 in Enhancement: MRMH0002
2) Maintained Transaction VS5 and G/L account no. for relevent chart of accounts in R/3 table T030K.

Invoice posting error MM-SUS scenario

Hello
We are implementing MM SUS scenario, when we send the invoice from SUS to MM, the invoice idoc failed with error "A company code cannot be determined for LS <supplier name>".
We had done all the required configuration in OBCA, OBCD and OMRY as per the config documnet but still the IDOC is in error status. I understand from one of the forum threads an user exit is required but, Is the user exit "EXIT_SAPLMRMH_011" really required to implement?
Also I had already gone through the forum thread "Invoice creation failure but it doesnt help me even though all the configuration is in place.
Please advice
Regards
Kiran

Hi..
Any inputs regarding above error?
Thanks
Kiran

MM-SUS Scenario: MM PO data transfered to SUS but SUS PO creation is fail

Hello All,
In case of MM-SUS scenario, when i created a MM PO and idoc data was sent to SUS, but in SUS transaction SXI_MONITOR i found that the line is scheduled instead of successfully status. In SMQ2 i found the error message: Storage form of product ID not yet defined in Cust omizing. As i know that in MM-SUS scenario, the material master is not needed to maintain in SUS. Please advise how to handle this trouble, thanks,
Best Regard
Joseph Chen

Hi Devi Swain,
Firstly thanks for your reply.
i have setted this configuration as you mentioned, and Prod.ID Lenth = 18, "Display leading zeros" and "save lexicographically" are not ticked. Then the new error message show:Prod.ID Lenth is longer than the customized setting.
By the way, MM material number lenth = 18
Best Regard
Joseph Chen

Schedule lines tranfer from R/3 to SUS in a MM-SUS scenario

Hi SRM gurus,
We are working on the MM-SUS scenario where the scheduling agreement is created in the backend R/3 system. Delivery schedule lines are generated in the backend and transfered to the SUS thru. ME9E transaction for sending the delivery schedule to the SUS.
We have a confirmation control key which guides us in SUS to create an ASN in the backend.
Though there is a confirmation control key exist in the SA for that particular line item, when the ASN is sent from SUS to XI to R/3. There is an idoc error in the R/3 which says that there is no confirmation control key though it is there for the line item which is transfered to SUS.
Now Pls. answer my questions :
1) Will ME9E transfer the total lines in the SA or the schedule lines with the delivery schedules only ?
2) Is it possible to resend the same schedule line ( with the updated delivery schedule) to the SUS as per the standard scenario?
3) In the SUS how do we findout the materials corresponding to that particular delivery schedule line. Because in SUS the reference is only the scheduling agreement number as we could not see any scheduline line item.
Pls. suggest.
We are working on SRM(SUS) 5.0 with ECC6.0 as the backend.
Best regards,
Sridhar.

i have seen the code --> where the FM is called for creation of SAR in SRM.
that is FM
BBP_SAPXML1_SUSPO_CREATE_IN --> in this --> search for this
Call API
      IF ls_header-description EQ 'DELINS'.
        CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_API_SUSPO_CRT'
        EXPORTING
          is_header   = ls_header
          it_item     = lt_item
          it_attach   = lt_attach
          it_partner = lt_partner
          it_longtext = lt_longtext
          it_tax      = lt_tax
          it_limit    = lt_limit
          it_sdln     = lt_sdln
        IMPORTING
          es_header   = ls_header_e
this one creates ---> the SAR in SRM.
and also i have seen further --> there is no place where any BADI is also called.
i am afraid it is not possible to control what you want using BADI.
only --> difference between --> New document and the old document is
the Indicator --> C for create
U for update.
And Also if you can see the XML message for the updated document --> you can see all the lines in the XML message.
Not the added lines...

MM-SUS scenario mapping of the Goodsreceipt for inbound delivery @SUS

Hi SRM gurus,
We are working on the MM-SUS scenario with SRM5.0 and ECC6.0 as the backend.
We are creating a goods receipt in the backend with respect to the inbounddelivery created from the ASN made at the SUS end.
But this goods receipt is not updated as the goods receipt in the SUS for that vendor.
Can anybody tell me how it is configured for the backend?
I could see a business object BUS2233 for the SUS confirmation transaction type as SUCF with the int.number range as 01 and the ext. number range as 02.
I am not sure where it is configured in MM. I could find one MM--> IM --> Define Number Assignment for Goods Receipt/Issue slips --> Number range grpg.code where there is an NO. rng.grpg.code and the Intern.number range as 01.
Is this the place we have the external number range as 01 which is maintained as internal in SUS BUS2233.
Any help in this regard.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Sridhar.
Edited by: P.T. Sridharbabu on Jan 31, 2008 4:57 AM

Hi All,
The report is running fine and could be able to generate the Idoc and sending it to the XI systems also. But our XI system is not able to post the same to the SUS system and is giving the following error :
The reference to a source object via the object number is different than the reference via the GUID Programm: SAPLBBP_BD_API; Include: LBBP_BD_APIF39; Line: 175
Any thoughts on this.
Shall I have to configure something in the SUS system for this report to capture there?
Or
Shall I have to configure something in the MM system ECC6.0 for this report to send it to XI correctly?
Thanks in advance.
Will be of most useful to us, if somebody throws some light on this.
Best regards,
Sridhar.

Problem in processing of SAR in MM-SUS scenario

Hi,
We have upgraded SRM4.0 to SRM 5.0 in MM-SUS scenario. We have a problem in processing of SAR list on the supplier logon portal.
When we click on All SAR list on supplier home page to display the list of SARs its going in infinite loop and giving timeout error after 30mins. When we checked in transaction SM50, found that program is not able to read records from table BBP_PDVIEW_IAP.
Number of entris in this table are 16lac.
Can anybody suggest the probable reason and solution?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Prashant

Hello,
could you solve this issue? I just got the same problem.
If you found a solution, please tell me how you dealt with.
Did you change the Mappings in XI?
Kind regards,
Barbara

SUS Scheduling agreement - MM SUS Scenario

Hi,
In MM SUS scenario, we create Scheduling agreement and the delivery schedule will be released and schedule will be sent to SUS which is a standard functionality.
But our requirement is to send the Scheduling agreement as whole..like we sned PO from MM to SUS. Does it work if I create a custom idoc message type similar to PO (orders) with proper segments relevant to Scheduling agreement and corresponding mapping with XML in SUS ?
Has anybody worked on this kind of development? if yes please share some inputs.
Appreciate any help
Regards
Kiran

Hi Abhishek,
we don't want to change the idoc type: we would like to know if is correct to configure idoc DESADV for ASN created on SUS from a scheduling agreement release...because the idoc DESADV is not registered on ECC6 because of the error mentioned in my first post.
Anyway, the note you suggested is referred to software components that differ from ours.
Thanks for suggestion.
Francesca

MM-SUS scenario with XML PO

Hi Gurus,
I m working on SRM 7.0, Ehp6, I want to configure MM-SUS scenario. I have activated the Business function LOG_MM_P2PSE_1 and also activated the start event CL_SE_PUR_PO_WF_OUT(Create and Change) for the Workflow WS53800008 in the MM system.
I have created a vendor and material in MM and replicated to SRM system. Also imported the Business scenario SE_SERVICE_PROCUREMENT in XI system. Now I am trying to create a PO in MM, but its not generating XML PO in MM system.
What could be the reason? If any one knows whole process and having configuration document for the same, kindly help me on this. It would be really thankful.
Regards
Rama

Hi Rama,
I understand that you are using XML message to replciate PO from ECC to SUS,
Step1:
for this to work you have do activate these workflow in ECC:
BOR Object Type     BUS2012     CHANGED     WS53800008     No errors
BOR Object Type     BUS2012     CREATED     WS53800008     No errors
In the details of these flag the "Linkage activated" then the XML message will be generated after you release the PO's.
Step 2:
00     SE     036     Line with blank quantity in item &1 &2 not supported in external system     W
00     SE     037     Basic line in item &1 &2 is not supported in external system                          W
Set the above messages to warning in ECC.
with Regards
Manjunath

Possible version conflict, sending purchase order to SUS in MM-SUS scenario

We are currently trying to get the MM-SUS scenario working. In this
scenario, we create a purchase order in the ERP/MM system. The
purchase order is then transferred into SUS via XI/PI.
After creating a purchase order in the MM system, the purchase order
reaches the SUS system, but then errors-out in the SUS system upon
posting. The specific error is paraphrased as follows:
No interface action for sender or receiver found (from Trace)
PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA
CX_ST_MATCH_ELEMENT
System expected the element http://sap.com/xi/SAPGlobal20/Global;
PurchaseOrderRequest
We suspect a version conflict. The SUS version is 7.01. The XI/PI
system is version 7.11.
Can you confirm or rule-out a version conflict?
The Integration Builder scenario we are using is Plan
Driven Procurement with Supplier Enablement.
We have tryed many variations in Integration Builder, but all
produce errors in SUS. The test tool in Integration Builder also shows errors
for certain message types. The message type ORDERS.ORDERS02
needed to be added manually, and did not come along with the scenario.
Edited by: Bill Guderian on Mar 19, 2010 4:53 PM

Any clue from here.
Note 936003 - ERS Invoice causes conversion error within SRM
When the SRM system attempts to process an ERS Invoice sent from the MM backend, a PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA CX_ST_DESERIALIZATION_ERROR fault is thrown.
Other terms
CX_ST_DESERIALIZATION_ERROR PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA SUS SRM EBP ERS Invoice XI Exchange Infrastructure Mapping
Reason and Prerequisites
This error will occur when the IDOC does not have a VPREI value; it is the result of an error within the divide logic of the XI mapping operation. This operation is performed within the XI system. A calculation of NETWR/MENGE is performed; however, the result is not properly formatted. As such, 72.30/10 produces a result of 7.2300002. This value is too long for the inbound SRM proxy and hence the error is thrown.
Solution
The solution to this problem is to add a FORMATNUM function within the XI mapping operation. This restricts the result to 2 decimal places, which adheres to the definition of the inbound proxy.
Step by step directions on how one implements the FORMATNUM function are as follows:
1. Log into the XI system with SAPGUI
2. Start the Integration Builder:Design tool (for steps on how to do this, review the steps below):
    a. Run transaction sxmb_ifr
    b. This will cause a browser to come up. Select the Integration Repository link
3. In the left pane, select the Objects tab
4. Navigate to the SAP SRM SERVER ' SAP SRM SERVER 5.0 ' http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SupplierEnablement/Global --> Mapping Objects --> Message Mappings folder
5. Double-click on MM2SUSInvoice
6. The right pane will display the mapping object
7. Select Edit mode
8. In the box that contains the output (Message Type: InvoiceRequest), navigate to InvoiceRequest ' Invoice ' Item ' Price ' NetUnitPrice
9. Double-click on the Amount element and you should see the mapping, represented graphically in the bottom pane
10. In the status line of the graphical editor, select Arithmetic from the list box:
11. To the right of the listbox, scroll until you see the FormatNum function
12. Click on FormatNum, which will cause the function to be added to the graphical editor. You may drag the box as desired
13. Select the connection that binds the if/then/else to the Amount box by grabbing the arrow within the input of the Amount
14. Release the drag of the connection while over the input to the FormatNum box. This will reassign the output of the if/then/else to the input of FormatNum
15. Create a connection between the output of the FormatNum box and the input of the Amount box. You accomplish this by clicking within the output and releasing within the input (respectively).
16. Save the modified mapping object
17. Activate the changes
    a. In the left pane, select the Change Lists tab
    b. Navigate to the Standard Change List entry
    c. Right-click the Standard Change List entry and select Activate
    d. Select only MM2SUSInvoice if more than one item is available, and press the Activate button
18. This will complete the required modification.

Open PO transfer to SUS system (MM-SUS Scenario)

Hi Guys,
We are implementing MM-SUS scenario (Go Live on 1st October 2009).
Currently the client has 750 open POu2019s since January 2009 and they want to transfer all the POu2019s to the SUS system during the cut over period.
We will change the PO and the POu2019s will be transferred to the SUS system in create mode
This can be attained by changing the process code in the message type ORDCHG from u201CME11 (ORDCHG: Purchase order change)u201D to u201CME10 (ORDERS: Purchase order) during the cut over period
Please advice, if transferring the open POu2019s to the SUS system will create any other complexities.
We could not find any information in the standard SAP document.
Regards,
Enrico

Hi,
Pls see the foll threads for pointers:
Transfer PO from EBP to SUS (one client)
Ordering party has to be a company
SUS Purchase order
Related note:
Note 954410 - Error creating SUS Admin user in SUS-EBP one client system
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

SUS Invoicing in EBP-SUS Scenario

Hello SRM Gurus,
Due to various business process we will be deploying ECS SRM with EBP-SUS scenario. We have strong requirement to provide PO invoice and non PO invoices ( eg utilities) via SUS. I know EBP-SUS scenario is limited to POR, I would apprecite if anyone has implemented invoicing in SUS as people tell me it is technically possible. If so, please share information.
-thanks!
Shilpa

Hi
Please go through this which might give you some useful details ->
In the original business package for SRM 5.0, the two iViews , "Invoice Monitor" and "Setting for Invoice Monitor" , are not included in the content. But for some business cases, these two iView are required.
To add these two new iViews change the business package content manually as described below in the Release-Independent SAP OSS Note 928764:
Note 928764 - BP SRM 5.0: Add two new iViews to standard business package
Note 543544 SUS: Extended Classic Scenario for EBP not supported
Note 662077 - No values return for Order/Contract Simulation on Invc Pymnt
Note 1096691 EBP invoice from SUS in ECS gets 'To Be Corrected Manually'
Note 1064557 SRM 6.0 SP02: Additional Notes to be applied on SRM Server
Note 700350 Supplier Enablement: Deployment Scenarios integrating SUS
Note 1024334 Error when sending invoices to EBP
Note 947198 IMS monitor: Web Dynpro with hierarchies
Note 836943 BP SRM 50 Additional Installation Information
Note 733255 BP Supplier Coll. 60.1: installation information
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Will MM-SUS scenario work perfectly if we replicate SUS vendors from SRM

Dear Gurus'
We are going to use MM-SUS scenario in our classic implementation of SAP SRM. However, we are not replicating the SUS vendors directly from MM system using BD14.
Instead, we are replicating the SUS vendors from SRM system by ticking the 'Portal Vendor' check box in SAP SRM.
Will all MM-SUS scenario work perfectly in such cases? If I refer the configuration of MM-SUS scenario, it mentions about special configuration for transferring the confirmation key from ECC vendor master data to SUS system. How it will be taken care in SRM-SUS vendor replication?
Could you please share your experience?
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan
Ranjan Sutradhar

hi,
Are the Suppliers getting Time Out Errors?
are they able to create the documents ?
I have seen these sort of problems in many customers , there is one performance note created by SAP to resolve this issue.
I do not have the note number now.
But you can search the same with keyword performance along with the component areas
SRM-SUS
ans SRM-EBP-TEC-PFM.
Best would be to enquire with SAP also..

R/3(MM) -XI- SUS Scenario Error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for