R/3 orders in CIC Locator BDD

Hi,
we need to integrate R/3 orders into the CIC Locator BDD View.
The problem is that the orders where not synchronized with our CRM system, so I need to create a separate search help, do to a search in R/3!
I think I have no way to integrate my searchhelp without modification, or is there another way, maybe without mod?
Is there anybody out there facing a similar request?
regards
Meex

Markus,
Please excuse my remark but, can you please re phrase your query. Its a bit confusing. Wat exactly are you trying to do?
Julius

Similar Messages

ERP Order in CIC - Need to default Division and Channel

Hi Experts,
Setting up ERP orders in CIC.
Everything is working fine, but to make it more efficient, we need to default the Channel and division in the order for less clicks and errors.
I tried using the user paramters SPA and VTW in both CRM and R/3, but with no luck.
can anyone help???
Just to clarify...we have multiple Divisions. So when we select new ERP order, we get a popup in te IC WeClient to select the division we need.
Thanks
Edited by: John P Doody on Jul 27, 2011 4:23 PM

Hi Dipanjan,
I thank for the time you gave.
Actually I had been told not to break the transaction but to do it through configurations.
I have done some research and found the solution for the requirement.
May be the below points will be useful for any one who has same kind of issue.
1.     SPRO -> MM -> Purchasing -> Define default values for document type:
I tried this path but system did not accept transaction MD14. Later I came to know that the path will support only purchasing transaction like ME*. So I have to leave this step.
2.     Tried transaction OMDD (Donu2019t know the SPRO path u2013 Frankly I am not export in MM, PP) u2013 Display view u201CPlanned Order Profileu201D Overview.
This transaction can be used for defaulting the order type (Purchasing) in Purchase Requisition block but since some other configuration was overriding this, I could not get benefit from OMDD.
3.     SPRO -> MM -> Consumption-Based Planning -> MRP Groups -> Carry Out Overall Maintenance of MRP Groups. (Transaction OPPZ)
This transaction will enable us to give default order type for purchasing block as well as for planned order block. This config work only for a plant and MRP group of a material and we need to give as many combinations as we require.
This transaction was already used to config and default order type in purchasing block earlier for some particular combination of plants and MRP groups.
I used some different combination of plant and MRP groups which will allow me to use the defaulting of order type for a combination of plant and MRP groups that I use in planned order.
I am not an expert but I took more than one day to research and get the solution.
I just gave the above information so that if in future any one gets same issue can give a try of the above steps and get the solution.
Any waysu2026 Thanks Dipanjan, your effort is really appreciated.
Sincerely
Ravi Shankar

CIC Locator Status

How can I reduce the number of "Status" that appear on the winclient's CIC Locator?
I have more than 200 status on the dropdown list: Open, In Process, ...
I know that for the "Status" list that appears on transaction CRMD_ORDER, I can go to transaction SM30 in the maintenance view CRMV_STATUS_PROC, and maintain the "status".
How can I choose the status to display on the cic's locator?
Thanks,
V

Hi,
filtering the status by customizing is not possible. The dropdown list
displays all possible status of the activity.
If you like to do a program modification, the best would be in
LCRM_LOCATOR_UIF05. Here in FORM f4_status_set, the status for the
drop down list are determined and had to be modified by you.
Hopefully this helps!
Regards, Gerhard

ATP check at sales order by storage location

Can I do an ATP check against a plant/storage location level during sales order entry? Basically, for a particular plant, if I have 2 storage location with the following quantities:
0010 = 100ea
0020 = 150ea
Can I create a sales order for 110ea, specify the storage location 0010, and have the ATP come back as saying that I will be 10ea short?

Hi Sandip,
I think this is Standard SAP, you can put Storage location in sales order and then ATP will check only in that storage location.
You dont need any special configuration for this. The only thing to be careful is what other documents like PO, Delivery you are using for considering in ATP.
Otherwise if a storage location is mentioned in the sales order ATP will happen only in that storage location.
Regards,
Abhishek

Stock Transport order issueing storage location determination

Folks,
In case of a Stock transport order scenario in which plant A with SLOC1 delivery to plant B with SLOC 2. Is there any option how the issueing storage location can be determined? The delivering plant can be determined through the special procurement key but there is no option for the issueing SLOC.
Regards,
MdZ

Hey Karen!
I am not sure if I understand your problem correctly.
You do not want the system to create a new MARD entry when postin goods issue.
You can enable/ disable this function with transaction OMB3 in the customizing.
have fun
Flo

Stock transport order between storage locations and assignment category type E not in MRP

Hello Gurus,
I have a stock transport order between 2 storage location which belongs to the same plant. Besides the stock transport order is allocated to a sales order (account assigment category E). When I run the MD03, the system take into account the quantity of the stock transport order as a future entry and this is wrong. I need that the MRP has not into account the stock transport order as an entry.
As an important information, If I modify the stock transport order removing the account asignment category E (sales order), then the MRP doesn't take into account it, so this is correct.
Could anybody tell me how to get it?
Thanks in advanced.

Laura,
It is normal that MRP will consider an STO as a receipt element; this is basic planning. It is unclear to me why you think you do not want it to do so, but I will assume you have some logical reason.
Contrary to what some others may have suggested, changing the scope of check for availability checking has no effect on which elements are considered for MRP. MRP is a completely separate functionality from Availability Check.
For Location > Location STOs (within a plant), then, you normally have the receipt element of the STO in the destination storage location, and the requirements element of an equal amount in the source storage location. Net of these two elements is zero, unless you have already issued the STO at the source location.
Changing the Account assignment from "E" means that the STO will not be relevant for your Sales order (in other words, when you receive this STO into the destination storage location, it cannot be used for your sales order). In a general MTO scenario, it also means that the proceeds of this STO (the stock you received) cannot be used for ANY sales orders.
One way that some people make an STO 'not relevant' for MRP is to alter the destination storage location such that it is not relevant for MRP. You can change the MRP relevancy of the storage location in MM02 > MRP4 tab
Best Regards,
DB49

Purchase Order: Ship to location problem - Please help

Hi All,
I have come across a problem when publishing Purchase orders where the PO header ship to address differs to a seperate PO line ship to address.
I have written the following Choose statement to try and show separate ship to locations for each separate PO line.
<?for-each:G_LINES?>
<?choose:?>
<?when:number(//G_HEADERS/POH_SHIP_TO_LOCATION) = number(//G_SHIPMENTS/PLL_SHIP_TO_LOCATION)?>
<?POL_LINE_NUM?> <?C_ITEM_DESC?> <?LINE_NOTE?>
<?end when?>
<?otherwise:?>
<?POL_LINE_NUM?> <?C_ITEM_DESC?> <?LINE_NOTE?>
SHIP TO: <?ADDRESS_LINE1?>
<?ADDRESS_LINE2?>
<?end otherwise?>
<?end choose?>
<?end for each?>
my logic is that if the header ship to ID is = to the line items ship to ID then just show some basic PO line info.
Otherwise if the numbers differ then show the individual lines info along with the additional Ship to address which is in ADDRESS_LINE1, ADDRESS_LINE2 etc.
And repeat this condition for how ever many PO lines exist for the overall purchase order.
However, when i publish this the "otherwise" condition never gets checked if the first PO line is TRUE and vis versa if the first PO line is false.
So if the first PO line is true then every single PO line will just show the When condition even if the separate PO lines ship to ID differs to the POH_ship to id.
any idea why the otherwise condition wont fall true for the 2nd 3rd or however many PO lines there are if the first PO line is flagged as true?
I hope this makes sense. Many thanks for any help.
Greg

I have a PO that we are using that has basically the same requirements. If the line address is different (any of them) then the header prints a message to "see below" and the address line contains the shipping information.
The way I have done this was to create a variable and compare to see of any of the lines were different when the header was read. Then check the var when the line is processed. The template is quite long as we have many fields that dynamically display/or not so I will post a truncated version below and also please note that on this form we simply gave up using the Oracle's "fantastic" MSWORD plug-in and had to use pure a XML-FO template. However, I think the portions/logic you need should be transferable into MSWORD if you are careful.
If snipit of code is not enough let me know and I can try to paste the entire thing after my marathon meeting today <ugh!>.
--------start code-----------
<xsl:for-each select=".//G_HEADERS">
<xsl:variable name="SAME_SHIP_TO_ADDRESS_USED" select="count(.//PLL_SHIP_ADDRESS_LINE1[. != current()/POH_SHIP_ADDRESS_LINE1]) = 0" />
...(lots of header stuff goes here)
<xsl:for-each select=".//G_SHIPMENTS">
<xsl:if test="$SAME_SHIP_TO_ADDRESS_USED" xdofo:ctx="3">
<fo:block xdofo:xliff-note="if:shipline, eif, if:shipline, ifCountShip>1, PLL_SHIP_ADDRESS_LINE1" padding-bottom="0.0pt" text-align="start" orphans="2" widows="2" padding-top="0.0pt" end-indent="0.0pt" linefeed-treatment="preserve" start-indent="0.0pt" height="0pt">
<fo:inline height="7.0pt" font-family="Arial" white-space-collapse="false" font-size="7.0pt">Address at top of page</fo:inline>
</fo:block>
</xsl:if>
<xsl:if test="not($SAME_SHIP_TO_ADDRESS_USED)" xdofo:ctx="3">
<fo:block padding-bottom="0.0pt" text-align="start" orphans="2" widows="2" padding-top="0.0pt" end-indent="0.0pt" linefeed-treatment="preserve" start-indent="0.0pt" height="0pt">
<fo:inline height="7.0pt" font-family="Arial" white-space-collapse="false" font-size="7.0pt">
<xsl:value-of select="PLL_SHIP_ADDRESS_LINE1" xdofo:field-name="PLL_SHIP_ADDRESS_LINE1"/>
</fo:inline>
</fo:block>
...(lots more address fields here!)
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
------------end code------------
Good luck,
Scott

Purchase Order - Issue storage location set mandatory entry

Hello All,
When create subcontracting PO, want to set the field of Issue storage location as mandatory.
I tried to find configuration "Materials Management>Purchasing>Purchase Order-->Define Screen Layout at Document Level", but there is not entry "Issue storage location" to set the screen layout field.
I searched previous threads, but only find some to mention issue storage location for STO. Now, I just use subcontracting PO that is same as NB document type.
Please your kind suggestion or any method to set Issue storage location as mandatory in PO.
Thanks very much!
Mag

Hi ,
Please, could you re-check it again, I have found storage location and issue storage location fields under define fields for fields selection group.
Under Field selection group NBF Purchase order
Selection group                    supplying plant
Issue storage location required entry chose
Under Field selection group NBF Purchase order
Selection group                    Basic data item
Storage location   required entry chose
After this setting, I can be find this storage location fields as Mandatory.
Regards,
Thiru

Sort Order of BIN Location Content Issue

SBO Version 9.0 PL08 HF1
We have an issue with trying to create a stock transfer document from within the 'BIN LOCATION CONTENT' screen. We have selected the option to 'Clear Stock'.
We have sorted the list by Item code and then selected the items we want to include.
We then clicked Stock Transfer > Clear Stock, which then generates a list of items which are either NOT in the order we sorted them by or we not even select on the opening screen.
One thing we have noticed from the system message bar at the bottom is that it has the following message in it:
"One or more selected warehouses or bin locations cannot be cleared or replenished."
This is proving very frustrating so any assistance would be greatly received!
Thanks,
Sarah

Hi,
Please check SAP note:
1978411 - wrong items in stock transfer created from bin location
content list
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Production Order - Invalid storage location

Hello,
I have made a production order through mrp for a halb. The issue is that when I try to release the order it gives me a message that "storage location 3603 is invalid for material nthl****". In MM03 -> MRP2 in Issue stor. location the correct value of 3603 is showing. Material availability check on the production order is also ok. Please help.
Regards

During Availabiltiy Check it will check the issuing Raw Material/another halb - so no link
You are saying in MMSC that storage Location is extended to 3603- ok no issue
More over in MRP2 view you are saying the "Production Storage Location" with 3603 (here for this it will be behave as Receiving Storage Location) - ok no issue
check in the Production Order "Good Receipt" subscreen GR Storage Location is "3603"
Check whether the 3603 storage location is specific for the Plant to the Material it has extended *
( or is there a confusion with number zero and letter"O")
Prabakaran K

Stock Transport Order UB order- Delivering Storage Location

We have UB / Stock Transport orders in place. Now we start a new flow of Stock Transport orders from a different Storage Location. When creating a UB order I only have the option to enter delivering Plant, not delivering SLoc.
So far I have a configged a new SLoc, SLoc reference , a new Shipping Condition.
What can I do to pull my materials for this new flow from my new SLoc?
Please let me know what you think, and I will be grateful.
Nick

Hi All,
Check out You have assigned all Company code, Plant & Storage location. If it is assigned properly you will get it in Stock Transport order. T.Code: Mb1b Movement type: 301 you can check it out
I thing it solves your problem.
Regards,
Pherasath

Set Up stock transfer order between storage location

Hi,
We are already using Inter company Stock transfer order.
Now we have found that it is possible to set up Inter company stock transfer order between two storage location.
Can i have some configuration steps. I have tried it but not working.
Thanks in Advance
Samir Bhatt

HI,
Create a puchase order ME21N ---> Save
Delivery VL10 G ---> Calculation rule (appropriate) --> Assaign the purchase order number here and execute.
Select the Delivery creation line and do the back ground process.
Start the log display and see the delivery document number by the documents button
Goto VL02N --> do picking and PGI --> Then do the MIGO with respect to the delivery document.
Billing (Intercompany pricing conditions should be set).
Regards,
Chetan.

Stock Transport Order - Issuing Storage Location

Hi gurus -
When raising a Stock Transport Order (UB type) and Issuing Storage Location is populated manually with an SLoc not extended for material in supplying plant, will system give an error or allow STO to be saved/created without throwing an error?
Thanks,
Karen

Hey Karen!
I am not sure if I understand your problem correctly.
You do not want the system to create a new MARD entry when postin goods issue.
You can enable/ disable this function with transaction OMB3 in the customizing.
have fun
Flo

Can you create relationship between Sales Order and Functional Location

I am working on a requirement for customer service. We are using Functional Location for customer facilities. We would like to relate a functional location to a sales order. Purpose is that we want to relate purchase of items to the functional location.
We can see that you can set technical object on a line by line basis, but you cannot relate a functional location. Does anyone know if this is possible with out of the box configuration? Or would I need to apply a user exit.
Thanks,
Tony Romain

Hi,
I don't think we can link a functional location to a sales order in standard sap.
Prase

Hi ! i want to know is there anyway to set a password on the power button in order to being locate when the ios device is stolen ?

I lost an iphone 2 mounth ago and i could not track my iphone because the thief had shut down my iphone ! Since that time i was thinking about some tweaks in iphone that we can set our devices on in order to do a nice trick on thieves.
The iphone pretend to be shut down and leave the screen on when there is attemp to shut down by a thief (so the iphone is on, but the screen is off ) ! therefor theif thinks the device is off, meanwhile the celluar date and find my iphone(icloud) will be switched on if they are switched off !
So it is much easier for people to locate their ios device and i think this is the best way for getting back the stolen ios devices !!!!

And how is the phone supposed to know if it's you or a thief pressing the Sleep/Wake Button and sliding to power off?
You want a passcode required to power off the device? So... what if you forget your password? What then?

R/3 orders in CIC Locator BDD

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for