R/3 to XI through Proxy

Hello All,
When I use SPROXY in R/3 all interfaces are greyed out.
Also when I do Connection Test
it gives message "Integration Builder address not maintained"
Pls send blogs/links for configuring the above message.
Regards

Hi,
Please refer below link for the settings reqired are whether compleetd or not.
ABAP Proxy configuration:
/people/vijaya.kumari2/blog/2006/01/26/how-do-you-activate-abap-proxies
SPROXY not working:
/people/vijaya.kumari2/blog/2006/01/26/how-do-you-activate-abap-proxies
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f83deb90-0201-0010-189c-8d3ff87572f8
Refer the below links:
/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/03/14/abap-proxies-in-xiclient-proxy
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2006/07/28/smarter-approach-for-coding-abap-proxies
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2b/f49b21674e8c44940bb3beafd83d5c/frameset.htm
Thanks
Swarup

Similar Messages

Can't access some secure sites through proxy?

can't access some secure sites through proxy server on osx it just keeps going local authority couldn't be contacted, i had the same problem with parental controls, but now that is off and its still doing it, is there a setting or something i need to enable?

In my original post, not today's, I had said I was having the issues on the Mini, running OSX 10.6.8 and Safari v.5.1.5 for my bank's pill pay. I should have been more specific as to which machine and OSX Safari browser I'm having the T-Mobile problem with. My mistake.
It is on both the MacMini and now the Air too. A moment ago, I was able to log in to my.t-mobile.com on the Air, but after putting into my Bookmarks folder, I can't do it anymore. The Log in button comes up greyed out instead of green.
I'm also still having trouble with my bank's bill pay section on both computers too.
I wonder if it's related to the saving of the log in info or putting in the Bookmark Folder?

ASA cut through proxy with RADIUS challenge response?

Have this working for IPSEC VPN on same box (tested on 8.2.1 and 8.2.3)
Want to do cut through proxy with challenge response - same ASA and same RADUIS server but using aaa authentication match command and this is what happens...
It looks like the ASA sends a completely different radius authentication request than with VPN authentication request. Is there any way to specify what request is sent?
What the RADIUS Server sees with ASA VPN auth - THIS WORKS OK (included for comparison)
Date: 15/11/2010
Time: 3:53:57 PM
Type: Information
Source: Server
Category: RADIUS
Code: I-006001
Description: A RADIUS Access-Request has been received.
AMID: 0xC8500B80B3D8F49C6CB37E5D32DA6682
Details:
Source Location : 10.xx.21.24
Client Location : 10.xx.21.230:1025
Request ID : 31
Password Protocol : PAP
Input Details : RADIUS Code:1, RADIUS Id:31, , User-Name:xxxx, User-Password:******, NAS-IP-Address:10.xx.21.230, NAS-Port:31, NAS-Port-Type:Virtual, vendor(9):attrib(1):0x1A2000000009011A69703A736F757263652D69703D31302E32312E352E313137, Calling-Station-Id:ip:source-ip=10.21.5.117
Action : Process
What the RADIUS Server sees with ASA cut thru - THIS FAILS (any help V welcome)
Date: 17/11/2010
Time: 2:29:31 PM
Type: Warning
Source: Server
Category: RADIUS
Code: W-006001
Description: An invalid RADIUS packet has been received.
AMID: 0xC19D988F83365F20151C3F6339DEC74B
Details:
Source Location : 10.xx.21.24:1812 (Authentication)
Client Location : 10.xx.21.230:1025
Reason : The sub-protocol of the received RADIUS packet cannot be determined
Request ID : 33
Input Details : 0x01210066055A8B6881266714BDB20380B9FE5FAC01066962333504060AC815E60506000000203D06000000051A2000000009011A69703A736F757263652D69703D31302E34302E352E3131311F1A69703A736F757263652D69703D31302E34302E352E313131
Request Type : Access-Request
Thanks in advance
IB

Hi Ian,
sorry for the late reaction - do you still need help with this?
The difference between the working (VPN) auth and the failing (CTP) auth seems to be that VPN is using PAP (so no challenge-response!) while the CTP is using MS-Chapv2
So my guess is that your Radius server does not support MS-Chapv2. If that is the case then you may want to try this:
aaa-server () host
no mschapv2-capable
Although this command is not really meant to be used in this scenario, so I'm not sure if it will work but I'm hoping it will make the ASA revert to PAP for all auth requests to this host.
Note that you won't be doing challenge/response, so your passwords will be transmitted over the wire (encrypted).
hth
Herbert

Re: (forte-users) HTTP request through proxy server

Daniel -
No, it does not. ;)
How do you say to HTTPRequest to go through proxy?
Thanks,
Taras
Daniel Nguyen wrote:
>
Hi,
It works very well. I have experienced this model for a distant Forte client
calling a Forte Server service Object for instance without any environment
and without TCP access (passing through firewall for instance).
It has also worked very well to make an injectot to improve Web Enterprise
and IIS using the SendRequest from HTTPAccess.
Hope this helps,
Daniel Nguyen
Freelance Forte Consultant
http://perso.club-internet.fr/dnguyen/
Taras Katkov a écrit:
HTTP request through proxy server using forte HTTP library?
Any experience?
Thanks,
Taras
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com--
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

You can also use the HTTP-DC project.... You don't
need Web Enterprise for this. From what I can tell,
this is available in L.x on....
There is api documentation in M.2 (with scant
examples.)
There's a special process to put the project in your
repository (it isn't installed in the repository in
the standard install,) the documentation in M.2
(probably in M.0 too, AFAIK) that tells you how to do
this (look for HTTP-DC in the online help.)
I haven't done much with it yet, I've just installed
it. If anybody out there has examples, that'd be
great. I'll try to contribute more the moment I get a
chance to explore it....
Christopher Fury
BellSouth Communications Systems
--- Daniel Nguyen <dnguyenclub-internet.fr> wrote:
Hi,
If you have Web Enterprise, you can user
HttpAccess.SendRequest().
Hope this helps,
Daniel Nguyen
Freelance Forte Consultant
Amin, Kamran a écrit:
Is there any way to make a HTTP request from TOOLto another HTTP Service?
thanks in advance.
For the archives, go to:
http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. Tounsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
For the archives, go to:
http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To
unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:
forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/

Getting through proxy servers

Hello,
Does anyone know if the URLRequest / Loader classes are able
to connect through proxy servers? In other words, does Flash read
the PC's proxy configuration and automatically use it?
Also, I was wondering, if one was to create a Socket and then
connect to a web site...
mySocket.connect("www.mydoman.com", 80);
but the user's PC uses a proxy server to connect to the
Internet, would this
connection succeed or fail?
Thanks for your insight.
Dan

Check the links below out. I think it may help you out some.
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-519
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-673

BPC Connection Through Proxy

Deal All,
We could not connect BPC through proxy server. Can anybody let me know any specific setting required.
Best Regards
Shesh

Sorin,
Thank you so much for the reply.
I think you are saying that when I connect that when I am connecting directly to BPCWEB it is saying knows you are authenticated to the windows domain. But when it gets it from the proxy server it is now not you anymore the BPCWEB server sees it coming from the proxy server NOT the windows domain.
So instead of DOMAIN/userID connecting it is PROXY/userID connecting. BPC doesn't know you. This cannot be the first time this has been seen.
Do you know a way around this? I am currently using sapwebdispatcher as my reverse proxy here, however I do not mind trying other products.
Would you have any recommendations on what your other clients use as a reverse proxy for BPC.
To simply things, we have DOMAIN users ---> Reverse proxy box ---> BPC Web .NET Server. We want to eliminte the ability for direct access to the BPC web .NET Server
Thanks again... any help would be great as we have been struggling for a few weeks to get this silly access issue resolved.
Edited by: Russell Hull on Feb 20, 2010 7:24 PM

ASA - cut through proxy authentication for RDP?

I know how to set this up on a router (dynamic access-list - lock and key)... But, I'm having trouble understanding how to setup OUTSIDE to INSIDE cut through proxy authentication for RDP.
OUTSIDE to INSIDE RDP is currently working.
I have 2 servers I want RDP open for..
[*]OUTSIDE 1.1.1.1 to INSIDE 10.10.70.100
[*]OUTSIDE 1.1.1.2 to INSIDE 10.10.50.200
What's required for OUTSIDE users to authenticate on the ASA before allowing port 3389 opens? I was hoping for is a way to SSH into this ASA, login with a special user, then have the ASA add a dynamic ACE on the OUTSISE interface to open 3389 for a designated time limit. Is this possible?
Here is my current config.
[code]
ASA Version 8.2(5)
hostname ASA5505
names
name 10.10.0.0 LANTraffic
name 10.10.30.0 SALES
name 10.10.40.0 FoodServices
name 10.10.99.0 Management
name 10.10.20.0 Office
name 10.10.80.0 Printshop
name 10.10.60.0 Regional
name 10.10.70.0 Servers
name 10.10.50.0 ShoreTel
name 10.10.100.0 Surveillance
name 10.10.90.0 Wireless
interface Ethernet0/0
description TO INTERNET
switchport access vlan 11
interface Ethernet0/1
description TO INSIDE 3560X
switchport access vlan 10
interface Ethernet0/2
shutdown
interface Ethernet0/3
shutdown
interface Ethernet0/4
shutdown
interface Ethernet0/5
shutdown
interface Ethernet0/6
shutdown
interface Ethernet0/7
shutdown
interface Vlan1
no nameif
security-level 50
no ip address
interface Vlan10
description Cisco 3560x
nameif INSIDE
security-level 100
ip address 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.252
interface Vlan11
description Internet Interface
nameif OUTSIDE
security-level 0
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.224
ftp mode passive
clock timezone PST -8
clock summer-time PDT recurring
dns domain-lookup OUTSIDE
dns server-group DefaultDNS
name-server 8.8.8.8
name-server 4.2.2.2
domain-name test.local
access-list RDP-INBOUND extended permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq 3389
access-list RDP-INBOUND extended permit tcp any host 1.1.1.2 eq 3389
pager lines 24
logging enable
logging timestamp
logging trap warnings
logging device-id hostname
logging host INSIDE 10.10.70.100
mtu INSIDE 1500
mtu OUTSIDE 1500
ip verify reverse-path interface OUTSIDE
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
asdm image disk0:/asdm-645.bin
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
global (OUTSIDE) 1 interface
nat (INSIDE) 1 LANTraffic 255.255.0.0
static (INSIDE,OUTSIDE) tcp interface 3389 10.10.70.100 3389 netmask 255.255.255.255
static (INSIDE,OUTSIDE) tcp 1.1.1.2 3389 10.10.50.200 3389 netmask 255.255.255.255
access-group RDP-INBOUND in interface OUTSIDE
route OUTSIDE 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.1 1
route INSIDE LANTraffic 255.255.0.0 10.10.1.2 1
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
timeout floating-conn 0:00:00
dynamic-access-policy-record DfltAccessPolicy
aaa authentication ssh console LOCAL
aaa authentication http console LOCAL
http server enable
http Management 255.255.255.0 INSIDE
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 28800
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
telnet timeout 5
ssh 10.10.70.100 255.255.255.255 INSIDE
ssh Management 255.255.255.0 INSIDE
ssh 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 OUTSIDE
ssh timeout 5
ssh version 2
console timeout 0
threat-detection basic-threat
threat-detection scanning-threat shun
threat-detection statistics access-list
threat-detection statistics tcp-intercept rate-interval 30 burst-rate 400 average-rate 200
webvpn
username scott password CNjeKgq88PLZXETE encrypted privilege 15
class-map inspection_default
match default-inspection-traffic
policy-map type inspect dns preset_dns_map
parameters
message-length maximum client auto
message-length maximum 512
policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
inspect dns preset_dns_map
inspect ftp
inspect h323 h225
inspect h323 ras
inspect ip-options
inspect netbios
inspect rsh
inspect rtsp
inspect skinny
inspect esmtp
inspect sqlnet
inspect sunrpc
inspect tftp
inspect sip
inspect xdmcp
service-policy global_policy global
prompt hostname context
no call-home reporting anonymous
call-home
profile CiscoTAC-1
no active
destination address http https://tools.cisco.com/its/service/oddce/services/DDCEService
destination address email [email protected]
destination transport-method http
subscribe-to-alert-group diagnostic
subscribe-to-alert-group environment
subscribe-to-alert-group inventory periodic monthly
subscribe-to-alert-group configuration periodic monthly
subscribe-to-alert-group telemetry periodic daily
Cryptochecksum:1e9d278ce656f22829809f4c46b04a07
: end
[/code]

You're running ASA 8.2(5). In 8.4(2) Cisco added support for what they call Identity Firewall rules. That is, you can make access-lists entries specific to users (or object groups containing users).
There's an overview document on this posted here. It's a bit dated but I believe the only change is that Cisco is now preferring use of the more current Context Directory Agent (CDA) - a free VM they provide - vs. the deprecated AD agent (software service that runs on your DC).

ASA - Cut-through proxy probleme

I have to configure my ASA 7.2.2 for cut-through proxy but when the users use authentication prompt ,
but only , for (http://1.1.0.2/netaccess/connstatus.html) the ASA send the following message:
User Authentication
User Authentication is not required.
help me
it is ok when one uses cut-through-proxy by ACL :
access-list ACL_INT extended permit tcp object-group PC-UAUTH_DYN host MVINCT19 eq www
access-list ACL_AUTH line 1 extended permit tcp host poste_auvinet host MVINCT19 eq www
aaa-server auth_inside protocol radius
aaa-server auth_inside host SVR-ACS-IN
key xxx
username admin password xxx privilege 15
aaa authentication match ACL_AUTH inside auth_inside
aaa authentication listener http inside port www
on a pix 525 is OK

Hi,
The config looks good. Please remember that successful authentication is cached (show uauth) and till it expires user will not need to authenticate again.
Please clear uauth and see if it helps.
Regards,
Vivek

How to create pass-through-proxy?

How do I create some kind of pass-through proxy that can listen and receive OCI, and then forward the commands to the oracle database (sometimes where the SQL is slightly altered). What is the best way to do this?
I failed to find any relevant help in the docs. :-(
Thanks in advance!

Anyone? I guess what I'm looking for is how to receive instead of just sending OCI commands, and extract the SQL from the received OCI commands/packages for possible modification/refactoring.

OSB 11g with PASS-THROUGH PROXY

hello all,
I my designing on latest Fusion Middleware 11g Release 1 (11.1.1.5.0)
a http soap based osb proxy service wraped around owsm saml2.0- sender- vouches-message-protection service policy
a http soap based osb business service wrapped around owsm saml2.0- sender- vouches-message-protection client policy
a standalone client is calling this Passive Intermediary Proxy
In case of pass-through proxy service,
I would like to know that is it necessary that the policy contract between client --->proxy should be similar to proxy--->backend
I think so, because proxy is not atall touching the entire stuff starting from <soap:envelope>.........</soap:envelope>
So client-sent tokens etc. must match with what back end service requires.
In general, what am I buying by routing the client call through pass-through proxy service if the back-end webservice requires that entire message must by encrypted. In this case there is nothing open for the proxy to view and make any decisions based on that through its pipeline pairs etc.

Check out the following link...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080450b5e.html

FRM-92102 through proxy

IE 6.x / Win XP
eTrus PROXY / Win XP
AS 10g 9.0.4 / Linux Red Hat
We are migrating from 6i to 9i.
With the 6i (cgi) we no have connect problems through proxy, but with 9i, after the second call the error appear.
We could run the first form/menu, but when this form call_form another form or call an LOV the error appear.
In the logs the conection to the AS is broken (possible from client, in this case the client is the PROXY).
If we skip the use of PROXY (in the Browser), the application can run success, we can call_form or LOVs.
Tx in advance for any help.
DL

Please take a look to the parameter networkRetries - if it is set in the formsweb.cfg or static.html.
See Note:216639.1

MAK activation through Proxy activate

dear all
good day
I'am using VAMT to activate all computers in my domain by using MAK activation, when I activate a windows 8.1 through "proxy activate" I found that the remaining activation count was decreased by 2 not by 1 when I apply the
confirmation ID.
while when iam using the same activation method to activate office pro 2010 it's work normally and decrease the activation count only by 1.
could any one help me and explain why is this happened and how to fix this problem.
thank you

Hi,
Did this happen for all computer with windows 8.1?
If you are activating a MAK key, you can retrieve the remaining number of activations for that key by selecting the MAK in the product key list in the center pane and then clicking
Refresh product key data online in the right-side pane. This retrieves the number of remaining activations for the MAK from Microsoft. Note that this step requires Internet access and that the remaining activation count can only be retrieved
for MAKs.
Regards.
Vivian Wang

Lync Sign in issue through Proxy

Hi All,
Not to be confused when said Lync Sign in issue through Proxy as it is unlikely that this is an issue with the proxy settings. Find it out yourself from the behavior below.
It is in fact a weird issue that I have come across.
Overall there are almost 30 Lync Users accounts.
And they are trying to authenticate to external Lync Server.
28/30 works fine through the proxy. Except for 2 user accounts.
The proxy settings are same for all the users and no individual configurations set.
Now, here is the interesting part. Go out of the network and authenticate this 2 user account to any of the workstation which is not going through Proxy, it works. Come back to the workstation which is going through the proxy and try again, it will work
now.
Now, I am interested in finding how exactly does Microsoft authenticates their Lync users. And what are the step by step procedure of User Authentication for Lync service. And why is this happening?
Just to add some more point here, these happens only with 2 specific accounts.
And if you try using these 2 accounts on any of the 28 working workstations, which is going through the proxy, the first time, it would still fail to get authenticated.
Can someone put a highlight on these behaviors? is there any user specific settings on the lync server?
Thanks for your inputs.

You can check the following blogs about Lync authentication process:
http://blog.schertz.name/2012/12/lync-2013-client-autodiscover/
http://blogs.technet.com/b/nexthop/archive/2012/11/28/lync-2010-client-authentication.aspx
Note: Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. The sites are not controlled by Microsoft. Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety, or
suitability of any software or information found there. Please make sure that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any suggestions from the above link.
You can enable Lync client logging to collect the log file to check the sign in process for these two users can’t sign in externally.
Lisa Zheng
TechNet Community Support

Pix cut-through proxy

a quick question since I do not have access to a pix I can not confirm it
say, I want to do pix cut-through proxy and authenticate access via tacacs on per user basis.
I want the user to access smtp user inside the pix will go through tacacs authentication.
my question is "do I need a statement for http on the access-list ?"
thank you.
here is the config
PIX-525# wr t
PIX Version 6.3(1)
access-list 100 permit tcp any host 155.1.1.4 eq http
access-list 100 permit tcp any host 155.1.1.4 eq smtp
access-list 150 permit tcp any host 155.1.1.4 eq http
access-list 150 permit tcp any host 155.1.1.4 eq smtp
access-group 100 in interface outside
static (inside,outside) 155.1.1.4 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
aaa-server AUTHEN protocol tacacs
aaa authentication match 150 outside AUTHEN

Cut-through proxy is a feature unique to PIX Firewall that allows user-based authentication of inbound or outbound connections. A proxy server analyzes every packet at layer seven of the OSI model, which is a time- and processing-intensive function. By contrast, the PIX Firewall uses cut-through proxy to authenticate a connection and then allow traffic to flow quickly and directly.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080172790.html

ASA Cut through proxy configuration

Hi guys,
I would like to configure limited internet access to olnly a select group of Windows AD users.
I beleive cut-through proxy will allow me to do this, just not sure how to configure it on a Cisco ASA-5510
thanks

The link given will definitely work however you would not be able to select access based on the AD group, if that is what you need to achieve and you have ASA version 8.0 you can work Cut-Through-Proxy together with DAP.
Using Cut-Trough-Proxy with a standard authentication server will only allow or reject depending on the authentication result, but any user within your AD schema will be able to get internet access. If you need to restrict this based o Windows Groups as well your best shot is Cut-Through-Proxy with DAP and LDAP:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_white_paper09186a00809fcf38.shtml

Hasn't anyone out here worked with cut-through proxy

hasn't enyone out here worked with cut-through proxy with acs. is there no one out here to help me out with cut-through proxy.
sebastan

Hi Sebastan,
For your case, what's the scenario looks like?
Rgds,
AK

R/3 to XI through Proxy

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for