R12 Process Lockbox Changes

Hi All,
Is there any change in the lockbox process compared from 11i to r12? If so, pls let me know on that.
When I ran the Process Lockboxes, I get the following error
Transmission amount disagrees with sum of receipt amounts
Transmission control count does not equal validated count.
AR-ARLPLB: If custom code exists, error found. No errors found in standard code.
AR-ARLPLB: Commited infomation...
If anybody came across similar scenario, Kindly share you knowledge on this, It will be of great help to me.
Expecting reply from you asap.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Sneha

Hi Sneha,
There are no changes to Lockbox process from R11i to R12. Check whether your Lockbox transmission format exactly matches to your lockbox control file so that you are not skipping any rows or incorrect loading in interface table. If you are using standard lockbox process, the process lockboxes for load, validate and post quick cash programs should go fine.
Regards, Kiran

Similar Messages

Performance issue in process lockbox

Hi all,
As per our client request, we customized process lockbox, splited validation and process lockbox seperately. We have 11 files to process daily.
Nowadays we are receiving huge files with more than 20K records. Process lockboxes is taking more than 8 hours to complete and also incompatibility is set for the process locbox by itself. SO we are unable to run parallelly also.
Our instance is 11.5 and no customization in process locbox concurrent program.
Is there any way to improve the performance of process lockbox?
Is there anyway to run in parallel?
Input will be very helpful for us..
Please post u r valuable inputs..
Thanks,
Sundar

Hussein/Srini
I am trying to get the trace and also regarding profile values.. Let me found out is there any change in improvement.
I have one more info to share.
From log file, we found that few blocks taking more time. For one file, 3 blocks take half of the execution time.
From log file,
entering arlpid
Current system time is 24-AUG-2010 08:25:29
exiting arlpid
Current system time is 24-AUG-2010 09:13:41
entering arlvcc
Current system time is 24-AUG-2010 09:19:19
exiting arlvcc
Current system time is 24-AUG-2010 10:20:55
entering arlvin-111
Current system time is 24-AUG-2010 10:23:42
exiting arlvin
Current system time is 24-AUG-2010 11:16:33
Total time taken to process 3211 file is ~ 350 minutes. But above three blocks were costing more. They have consumed ~170 minutes i.e. half of the execution time.
What is this blocks?
This there anyway to analyse this block and improve th performace?

Process Lockbox: Invalid matching number

We are upgrading from 11.5.10 to R12.1.3. When trying to process a transmission we encounter Error: 42440 - Invalid Matching Number for few invoices in the batch. These invoices are open in the system. Trying to run lockbox by navigating to Interfaces > Lockbox and Submit Validation. I am able to create a receipt manually and select this particular invoice and apply it. Not sure why process lockbox is saying Invalid matching number. Same file processed fine in 11i.
Log of process lockbox:
Receivables: Version : 12.0.0 Copyright (c) 1979, 1999, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved. ARLPLB module: Process Lockboxes +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Current system time is 18-SEP-2013 11:25:05 +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Starting ARLPLB Input parameters: N 24745 14690463 hjnonocr0918-2 N 1060 Y N 2013/08/31 00:00:00 A Y N N 570 N 1 L Scoring model Id is NULL Lockbox id is NULL. autoapply_flag : N 1662 24745 6 4 416423N 7 N rows updated : 0Transmission control count does not equal validated count. Transmission control amount does not equal validated amount. AR-ARLPLB: If custom code exists, error found. No errors found in standard code. AR-ARLPLB: Commited infomation... p_set_of_books_name='BSGUSD' Current NLS_LANG and NLS_NUMERIC_CHARACTERS Environment Variables are : American_America.WE8ISO8859P1 ' ' Enter Password: REP-0004: Warning: Unable to open user preference file. MSG-00100: no_data_found was raised Report Builder: Release 10.1.2.3.0 - Production on Wed Sep 18 11:25:07 2013 Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved. +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Start of log messages from FND_FILE +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ End of log messages from FND_FILE +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Exiting ARLPLB +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Start of log messages from FND_FILE +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ End of log messages from FND_FILE +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Did anyone face this issue? Any help appreciated. Thanks!!

No one encountered this issue so far?

BAPI for Process order change

Hi,
Can any buddy tell me the Bapi used for Process order change
with following scenarios:
Quantity change
Resource change
Rescheduling
Control key change
RM Change
Recipe change
TECO
REVOKE
Material shortage check
Best Regards,
Sheetal.

Hi,
BAPI_PROCORD_CREATE for process order create
BAPI_PROCORD_CHANGE - Change Process Order
BAPI_PROCORD_CLOSE - Close Process Order
BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CANCEL for Cancel Process Order
Confirmation.
BAPI_PROCORD_COMPLETE_TECH - Complete Technically
BAPI_PROCORD_RELEASE - Release Process order
BAPI_PROCORD_SET_DELETION_FLAG - Deletion Flag
BAPI_PROCORD_REVOKEUSERSTATUS - Cancel User Status
BAPI_PROCORD_SCHEDULE - Carry Out Scheduling
pls refer below link
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/200dd1cc-589e-2910-98a9-bb2c48b78dfa
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/e0/9eb2370f9cbe68e10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
Regards,
Sankaran

PI 7.31 (single stack) posting RFC gives this error: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE: Processing of change number CO-01234 cancelled (raised by system ECCHostXYZ)

I'm trying to determine if I am dealing with an RFC connection issue or just an error resulting from the RFC itself.
The error says "Processing of change number...cancelled (raised by...ECCHostXYZ)".
I thought this was a problem with my RFC config because it is labeled as "RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE".
However, when I google that specific message, it appears to be an error specific to change order creation.
Here’s my google search: http://goo.gl/ZhKsm3
Here is the error again:
RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE: Processing of change number CO-01234 cancelled (raised by system ED1|ecc-host-xyz)
When I check ST22, I see no RFC errors.

Hi Jody,
No st22 exception is needed to be throwed in order to raise a controlled exception in the RFC.
You would need to check the RFC in the ECC system with the data that you are sending from PI, if the data is the same, you would need to check PI user RFC roles with the ECC roles user that you used to check the data integrity in the ECC test.
To avoid this error you can do a Z RFC to wrap the standard RFC and to control the exceptions errors with a BAPIRET2 strucutre to return to PI.
Hope this helps.
Regards.

Processing on change of field values in internal table

I have a internal table eg
id            type                  keyword
1               1                      report
1               1                      program
n02           4                     event
n02           5                      loop
n03           6                      call
n03           6                       do
No when even id changes from 1 to n02...i want to write " id id 1' similarily wenever id changes from n02 to n03 then id is " id is n02" and so on
How can do some sequential processing on change of field values in internal table

hi,
This code will resolve your purpose.
DATA:
BEGIN OF t_tab OCCURS 0,
int TYPE c,
str TYPE char10,
var TYPE char3,
END OF t_tab.
t_tab-var = '1'.
t_tab-int = 1.
t_tab-str = 'report'.
APPEND t_tab.
t_tab-var = '1'.
t_tab-int = 1.
t_tab-str = 'program'.
APPEND t_tab.
t_tab-var = 'n02'.
t_tab-int = 4.
t_tab-str = 'event'.
APPEND t_tab.
t_tab-var = 'n02'.
t_tab-int = 5.
t_tab-str = 'loop'.
APPEND t_tab.
t_tab-var = 'n03'.
t_tab-int = 6.
t_tab-str = 'call'.
APPEND t_tab.
t_tab-var = 'n03'.
t_tab-int = 6.
t_tab-str = 'do'.
APPEND t_tab.
LOOP AT t_tab.
ON CHANGE OF t_tab-var.
    WRITE:
      / 'id' ,t_tab-var, t_tab-int.
ENDON.
ENDLOOP.
Thanks and regards
Sharath

Wm - process posting change

Hi experts,
I am transfering a material from wm managed storage location to wm managed s.location.In MB1B with 311 mvt i have created material document.when i am doing lt06 two types of screens appearing.one is Process posting change:stock overiew which is LT05 screen.some times another screen appearing i.e Process posting change:generate t.o item (stock placement).please send suggestions. Rewards on helpful answers.

Dear Milind,
Please have a look at OSS notes nos. 965094 and 566090. As a rule, direct transfer order creation is possible if the posting triggered by the usage decision (to unrestricted use stock, for example) refers to the entire inspection lot quantity.
Best regards,
Christiane

Batch process name changes in photoshop cc 2014

Hi,
How can I batch process name changes in photoshop cc 2014 without opening Bridge?
thank you in advance,
christos

are you talking about layer names or file names or turning layers into files

Process to change the order of the hierarchy nodes

Hi,
What is the process to change the order of the hierarchy nodes ( and associated attributes) through import manager? any pdf's or doc's regarding this?

In Import Manager it is not possible to change the order of hierarchy nodes or the order of the linked attributes.
Regards,
Ronen

[svn] 1743: In the process of changing the messaging authentication tests to run over individual channels .

Revision: 1743
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-05-15 12:26:11 -0700 (Thu, 15 May 2008)
Log Message:
In the process of changing the messaging authentication tests to run over individual channels. Before the tests were just running over the first/default channel in the destination. Now the tests will be hardcoded to run over a particular channel. In this checkin I am removing the existing authentication tests and checking in tests that run over a polling amf channel. Tests for other channels are coming soon.
Modified Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/flex/messaging-config.mods.xml
Added Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/JMSAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/JMSAuthProSendTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/JMSAuthSendSubscribeConstraintTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MessagingAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MessagingAuthProSendTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MessagingAuthSendSubscribeConstraintTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MessagingAuthenticationTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MessagingAuthenticationTest2.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MultiTopicMessagingAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml
Removed Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/JMSAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/JMSAuthProSendTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/JMSAuthSendSubscribeConstraintTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/JMSAuthSendSubscribeConstraintTest_Streaming.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MessagingAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MessagingAuthProSendTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MessagingAuthSendSubscribeConstraintTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MessagingAuthenticationTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MessagingAuthenticationTest2.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MultiTopicMessagingAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml

Remember that Arch Arm is a different distribution, but we try to bend the rules and provide limited support for them. This may or may not be unique to Arch Arm, so you might try asking on their forums as well.

Process to change IP of the Replication Applicance

Hello VMware Community,
I'm looking for a little guidance here. What would be the recommended process to change the IP of a replication appliance?
We find that when we change the IP of the appliance via the "Network" tab in the VAMI; the web GUI is no longer accessible even after a power cycle using the newly assigned IP(The IP changes successfully). If we attempt to change the "Configuration" on the VR tab to specify the new IP prior to the IP change of the appliance itself we get the same behavior. Any advice is appreciated.

Hello,
Can you clarify which VR version you are using?
-Appliance Version: 5.5.0.0 Build 1309877
Can you also clarify "the web GUI is no longer accessible" - is this about the VAMI UI or the VR UI plugin in the Web Client?
-This is about the VAMI UI. Once the IP change is saved via the VAMI UI (change is confirmed via the console/VSphere client). The new x.x.x.x:5480 address is not resolvable; we simply get a timeout.
To give a bit more information once we assign the new IP, gateway, dns information, etc... The VAMI UI times out (as we would expect as it's IP has changed), but after the appliance has been power cycled we still cannot access the VAMI UI using the newly assigned IP. SRM cannot see the appliance either as we cannot specify the IP via the "Configuration" section of the VR tab.
If we revert all the changes, and assign the old IP back to the appliance everything works as expected.
Thanks!

I am in the process of changing Iphones, I have synced everything from my old phone, how do i transfer it to the new phone??, I am in the process of changing Iphones, I have synced everything from my old phone, how do i transfer it to the new phone??

I am in the process of changing phones. I have synced all the information off my old phone onto itunes, i now wont to get this information onto my new phone, how do i do this??

Follow the directions here, this document even tells you what to do with your old phone:
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht2109

Process Chain changing start time?

hi guysm i have 76 process chains that run every day in BWD system, so i removed all the timings from the start variant and in the infopackages, but it seems some process chains are still running, i did do the following steps on chnaging the time from a particular time to immediate, Save, Check and activate, i didnt schedule it as i dont want it to load right away .
do i have to hit check , save , schedule once i change the time from a particular time to immediate load or activate will work as well.?
what else could be the cause of process chains still loading even there are no events, or time given to any process chains at all.
i went to sm 37 and i can see the bi process are all running at the time they were orignially set up on.
so any suggestions would help,
is there any way from sm 37 i can tell which process chain is triggered off?
thanks
Dante(devils never cry)

Dante, the start conditions on the infopackages do not affect when they run in process chains. The process chains have their own start job. If you want to change the start time of a process chain, then you need to go to maintain the process chain, right-click on the Start process and select Displaying Scheduled Job(s)... . Here you will see a job called BI_PROCESS_TRIGGER. Change the start conditions of this job.
The start job for all process chains is BI_PROCESS_TRIGGER, so using SM37 may be difficult to identify which BI_PROCESS_TRIGGER job is associated to a particular chain.
Also, to let you know, each process in a process chain has an associated job. All jobs called BI_PROCESS_xxxxx are jobs associated with a process chain.
Eg.
BI_PROCESS_LOADING is an infopackage.
BI_PROCESS_TRIGGER is the start job
Does this help?

The process to change apple ID's on iPhone 4s without effecting apps

To give a bit of background on my situation, I bought my first iPhone (4s) a few months ago, and when I bought it the cell phone sales representive asked if I had an Apple ID. At the time I told him no, because I did not know exactly what it was so figured I did not have one. So he showed me where on my iPhone I could create and enter my Apple ID. When I got home I created one and have been using it on my iPhone ever since. A couple weeks after that I came to find out my iTunes account was also a Apple ID (when I signed up for iTunes years ago Apple ID did not exist). So I was not aware having a iTunes account automatically meant it was also my Apple ID. So now I have this dilemma where more original Apple ID has all my downloaded music on it, and my new Apple ID on my iPhone has all my apps on it! Ugh! So frustrating as I know you can not merge the 2 from reading the communities here. I also know from reading here that logging in with a different Apple ID on my iPhone will prevent me from updating apps. Luckily by time I realized I had 2 Apple ID's it was before I downloaded anything that cost money on my new one, so I am more than willing to forfeit it. So in the process of doing this I have a few questions to make it as easy as possible and to prevent any complications.
1.) Since signing into my iPhone 4s with a different Apple ID will prevent updates on existing apps, I would like to know if deleting ALL my apps (which I am willing to do since all the ones I have downloaded were free so far), will I be able to redownload them on my new Apple ID on the same iPhone without any complications redownloading the apps back, and without any complications updating them?
2.) Will changing my Apple ID on my iPhone effect anything else on my phone besides my apps? Keep in mind I have not downloaded any music on this Apple ID or on my iPhone yet. Will it effect my pictures or videos or contacts or my calender dates? Will it effect my iCloud account or is iCloud seperate from Apple ID or are they linked together?
3.) Lastly if deleting my apps and changing my Apple ID and redownloading them will prevent complications with my apps, after doing all of that how can I get rid of the mistake new Apple ID I made that I will no longer be using? I would like to use the email address that is on my new (mistake) Apple ID on my original Apple ID. So is there a away to have the new mistake Apple ID deleted after I switch everything? If so, then how?
I am off work next couple days and would like to get this resolved tomorrow or at least with in the next 2 days get everything switched over so I can finally sync my music onto it from my computer. I appreciate any responses and help.

go to appleid.apple.com to reset your apple id password.
Under where it reads manage id there are words that read 'reset password' click on this area to reset password.
Once you have the password to your apple id you will be good to go .
Good luck frined.

Lockbox: Partial payment is not creating when processing Lockbox file

Hello experts,
I am processing the Lockbox EDI 823 file but it is not creating the partial payment instead of that it is creating the Residual. I already check my config OBAY and I have "Partial Payment" checked.
MY business really doesnu2019t want to have original invoice cleared and create the new one in case of over/under payment outside the tolerance limit. Please let me know how I can resolve this issue.
Thanks
Farooq

Hi Hema,
Is the SAP document is from the same company code, where the lockbox is configured or it is a different company code?
If you have an user exit and if all the company codes having same document numbering, then the lockbox program may not able to pick up the correct invoice number, if you have the same invoice number in more than one company code. To my understanding, the lockbox program first tries to identify the customer based on MICR number and then see all the open invoice in that customer and if it finds a match it will apply or else it will post on account on that customer otherwise it will not process it.
So, can you please check whether
1. You have a valid MICR number in the customer master and if the same MICR number is available in the lockbox, then the lockbox will identify customer and apply based on the invoice details available.
2. If it is a new MICR number, then Lockbox program, should identify the customer through a SAP document, if there is a user exit, it will see whether that document is OPEN in any of the company codes and identifies the customer based on that.
If any of these conflicts, then it may not able to process that check.
Regards,
Vijay

R12 Process Lockbox Changes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for