R12 upgrade path

Hi All,
Does anyone have a document about R12 upgrade path. Would like to know what is the future of R12 with Fusion coming up soon.
Thanks
Srini

If you search for Apps Unlimited in www.oracle.com you will get the hits.
http://www.oracle.com/applications/applications-unlimited.html
Applications Unlimited :
Oracle commits to individual product line enhancements even after the delivery of Oracle Fusion Applications

Similar Messages

R12 Upgrade Path Advice (RHEL 3)

Dear All,
I would like you to provide me some input on R12 upgrade.
Our current setup is
OS: Red Hat Linux AS 3.0 32-bits
EBS: 11.5.10.2
DB: 10.2.0.4
New setup
OS: Red Hat Linux 6.x 64-bits
EBS: 12.1.3
DB: 11.2.0.3
I have searched various notes, but can not find anything specific to it RHEL 3.0.
R12 is not supported on RHEL3.0, so I can't upgrade it on current system and then migrate it to RHEL6 system using note 471566.1.
Can you please advice me what options we have here ?.
Thanks in advance
Regards

Our current setup is
OS: Red Hat Linux AS 3.0 32-bits
EBS: 11.5.10.2
DB: 10.2.0.4
New setup
OS: Red Hat Linux 6.x 64-bits
EBS: 12.1.3
DB: 11.2.0.3
I have searched various notes, but can not find anything specific to it RHEL 3.0.
R12 is not supported on RHEL3.0, so I can't upgrade it on current system and then migrate it to RHEL6 system using note 471566.1.
Can you please advice me what options we have here ?.You do not need RHEL 3.0 and you just need to lay down R12 on RHEL 6.x 64-bit and do the upgrade from that node. The 11i node is not used during the upgrade, and there is no point of installing R12 on an OS and migrate it to a different OS.
Oracle E-Business Suite Installation and Upgrade Notes Release 12 (12.1.1) for Linux x86-64 [ID 761566.1]
Oracle E-Business Suite Upgrades and Platform Migration [ID 1377213.1]
Interoperability Notes Oracle EBS 11i with Oracle Database 11gR2 (11.2.0) [ID 881505.1]
Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.1.3 Now Available
https://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/entry/ebs_1213_available
Thanks,
Hussein

Upgrade path for 11.5.10.2 to R12.1.3

Hi All,
We are in the process of upgrading our 11.5.10.2 instance to R12.1.3. Could anyone tell me the upgrade path for this
Do we have to mandatorily upgrade first to R12.1.1 and then apply R12.1.3 MP?
Also Please confirm if we have any R12.1.3 software to install? I don't think so but just want to double confirm.
Thanks

Hi,
We are in the process of upgrading our 11.5.10.2 instance to R12.1.3. Could anyone tell me the upgrade path for this
Do we have to mandatorily upgrade first to R12.1.1 and then apply R12.1.3 MP?To upgrade 11i to R12, please refer to:
Oracle Applications Upgrade Guide: Release 11i to Release 12.1.1
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B53825_03/current/html/docset.html
Database Preparation Guidelines for an E-Business Suite Release 12.1.1 Upgrade [ID 761570.1]
Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.1.3 Now Available
http://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/2010/08/ebs_1213_available.html
Also Please confirm if we have any R12.1.3 software to install? I don't think so but just want to double confirm.
You need to upgrade to 12.1.1 then apply 12.1.3 Release Update Pack (Patch 9239090) -- No fresh installation software is available for 12.1.2/12.1.3
Thanks,
Hussein

Not able to compile .pll or .fmb through installation file in R12 Upgrade.

While compiling .pll or .fmb individually using this command
1. frmcmp_batch module=$AU_TOP/forms/US/XXIB_I10_BA_BALEVEL.fmb userid=apps/appla1na output_file=$XXIB_TOP/forms/US/XXIB_I10_BA_BALEVEL.fmx compile_all=special batch=yes
OR
2.frmcmp_batch module=XXIB_I10_EXT_SEARCH.fmb userid=apps/appla1na output_file=$XXIB_TOP/forms/US/XXIB_I10_EXT_SEARCH.fmx compile_all=special
The file gets compiled and .plx & .fmx is generated.
Same command in .install file doesnt get compiled. Sample given below
# +======================================================================+
# Generation of English Forms
# +======================================================================+
echo "------------------------------- " | tee -a $LOG_FILE
echo "Generating Forms in English ... " | tee -a $LOG_FILE
echo "------------------------------- \n" | tee -a $LOG_FILE
export FORMS_PATH=$AU_TOP/resource:$AU_TOP/forms/US:$XXIB_TOP/forms/US:$FORMS_PATH
#exportFORMS60_PATH=$XXIB_TOP/forms/US:$AU_TOP/resource:$XXIB_TOP/resource:$AU_TOP/forms/US:$FORMS60_PATH
rmf $XXIB_TOP/forms/US/XXIB_I10_BA_BALEVEL.fmx
#commented out for R12 Upgrade by KISHAN WIPRO
#f60gen $XXIB_TOP/forms/US/XXIB_I10_BA_BALEVEL.fmb $APPS_LOGIN_ID Compile_All=YES output_file=$XXIB_TOP/forms/US/XXIB_I10_BA_BALEVEL.fmx >> $LOG_FILE 2>> $LOG_FILE
#command used to compile in R12
frmcmp_batch module=$AU_TOP/forms/US/XXIB_I10_BA_BALEVEL.fmb userid=$APPS_LOGIN_ID output_file=$XXIB_TOP/forms/US/XXIB_I10_BA_BALEVEL.fmx compile_all=special batch=yes
if [ $? -eq 0 ];
then
echo "Billed Accounts Level Form Generation successful. " | tee -a $LOG_FILE
else
echo "Billed Accounts Level Form Generation failed. \n Please check the log file for error details and re-run." | tee -a $LOG_FILE
exit 1
fi
Need some help urgent
Contact me @ [email protected]
Edited by: 862540 on Oct 2, 2011 11:23 PM

Hi,
I have tried it, by inserting it before the form compilation code the echo command works , but then while compilation it gives me an error as file not found . This file XXIB_I10_BA_BALEVEL.fmb is existing in the given path . Is it a problem with the userid being given so. As i am able to compile the file individually(During individual compilation i have hard coded the username and password), not through a installlation file . Have even checked the FORMS_PATH even thats right .
Command used in installation file :
# +======================================================================+
echo "------------------------------- " | tee -a $LOG_FILE
echo "Generating Forms in English ... " | tee -a $LOG_FILE
echo "------------------------------- \n" | tee -a $LOG_FILE
export FORMS_PATH=$AU_TOP/resource:$AU_TOP/forms/US:$XXIB_TOP/forms/US:$FORMS_PATH
#export FORMS60_PATH=$XXIB_TOP/forms/US:$AU_TOP/resource:$XXIB_TOP/resource:$AU_TOP/forms/US:$FORMS60_PATH
rmf $XXIB_TOP/forms/US/XXIB_I10_BA_BALEVEL.fmx
#commented out for R12 Upgrade by KISHAN WIPRO
#f60gen $XXIB_TOP/forms/US/XXIB_I10_BA_BALEVEL.fmb $APPS_LOGIN_ID Compile_All=YES output_file=$XXIB_TOP/forms/US/XXIB_I10_BA_BALEVEL.fmx >> $LOG_FILE 2>> $LOG_FILE
echo "Starting with compilation of English Form BA_BALEVEL"
frmcmp_batch module=XXIB_I10_BA_BALEVEL.fmb userid=$APPS_LOGIN_ID output_file=$XXIB_TOP/forms/US/XXIB_I10_BA_BALEVEL.fmx compile_all=special
if [ $? -eq 0 ];
then
echo "Billed Accounts Level Form Generation successful. " | tee -a $LOG_FILE
else
echo "Billed Accounts Level Form Generation failed. \n Please check the log file for error details and re-run." | tee -a $LOG_FILE
exit 1
fi
Not able to diagonis the error .
Regards
KISHAN.M.G

Why does NFS umounts itself during R12 upgrade

Dears,
We have a problem in NFS. When our oracle team in upgrading the oracle to R12, after a certain step the NFS umounts, from the client side the error as below,
Jun 23 10:16:53 bananadev01 nfs: [ID 733954 kern.info] NOTICE: [NFS4][Server: appledev01][Mntpt: /u02]NFS server appledev01 not responding; still trying
Jun 23 10:19:57 bananadev01 nfs: [ID 559769 kern.info] NOTICE: [NFS4][Server: appledev01][Mntpt: /u02]NFS server appledev01 ok
Jun 23 10:22:57 bananadev01 nfs: [ID 733954 kern.info] NOTICE: [NFS4][Server: appledev01][Mntpt: /u02]NFS server appledev01 not responding; still trying
On the server, there aint any error related to NFS.
Any help ?

Hi Murali,
We have a 11.5.10.2 instance with 10.2.0.5 database and we are Planning to upgrade the database to 11.2.0.3 during our upgrade R12.1.1, as per the note 761570.1, we have the Patch C and Path D available to us. We have decided to use the path C i.e upgrade the database to 11.2.0.3 during the R12 upgrade itself and no two downtime windows. As per this note 761570.1, in path c If the database upgrade is part of the R12 upgrade, perform all the steps in the Interoperabity Notes except the following steps:
Verify software versions
Run adgrants.sql
Implement and run Autoconfig
Re-create grants and synonyms
Restart Applications server processes
Apply Oracle Human Resources (HRMS) patch 7721754
so does that mean we don't have to apply any patches mentioned under Verify software versions like Interoperability patch , ATG Patch 7456837 etc.. on 11i ?
If you are planning to upgrade the database in the same downtime window of R12 upgrade, then you do not need to apply the patches under "verify software versions" section in the 11i doc. However, you need to consider applying the patches under the same section in (Interoperability Notes EBS R12 with Database 11gR2 [ID 1058763.1]). Those patches should be applied before you release the R12 instance to the users.
Thanks,
Hussein

Upgrade from SCCM 2012 SP1 CU4 to R2 Fails - Unsupported Upgrade Path

Hi everybody,
I'm currently upgrading our SCCM infrastructure to SCCM 2012 R2 after have finished with the upgrade from SCCM 2012 RTM to SP1 CU4, thus far everything works fine, but when I try to update any
of the site servers, whether CAS or Primary, I'm getting the following error message in the Prerequisites Check:
I've gone through the system requirements and prerequisites over and over again and I can assure you that every possible update, supported OS, feature set, SQL Server, check list, etc,
etc, have been followed as per the official documentation available, however I'm stuck in this point, and surely enough I haven't been able to find out a similar case.Additionally I'm adding
the ConfigMgrPrereq log (the relevant portion of it) in case someone could kindly take a look at it.
<04-25-2014 02:06:46> ******* Start Prerequisite checking. *******
<04-25-2014 02:06:47> ********************************************
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFO: Detected current installed build version [7711] for sitecode [BRA]. For Upgrade,
minimum supported installed build version is [7804].
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;
Unsupported upgrade path;    Error;
Configuration Manager has detected that one or more sites in the hierarchy are installed with a version of Configuration Manager that is not supported for upgrade.
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFO: This rule only apply to primary site, skip checking.
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;
Active Replica MP;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFO: This rule only applies to primary or secondary site in hierarchy, skip checking.
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;
Parent site replication status;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> <<<RuleCategory: Database Upgrade Requirements>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking the target ConfigMgr database is ready to upgrade...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> ===== INFO: Prerequisite Type & Server: SQL:INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int
=====
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> <<<RuleCategory: Access Permissions>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking access permissions...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
SQL Server sysadmin rights;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;    SQL Server sysadmin rights
for reference site;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFO: CheckLocalSys is Admin of <INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int>.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Site server computer account administrative rights;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
SQL Server security mode;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: System Requirements>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking system requirements for ConfigMgr...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: OS version:601, ServicePack:1.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Target computer is a Windows server.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Unsupported site server operating system version for Setup;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Domain membership;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Pending system restart;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: Dependent Components>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking dependent components for ConfigMgr...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Return code:0, Major:10, Minor:50, BuildNum:4000
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
SQL Server version;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Get Sql edition:Enterprise Edition.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
SQL Server Edition;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Checking Tcp is enabled to Static port, SQL Server:INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int,
Instance:.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
SQL Server Tcp Port;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Checking if SQL Server memory is limited.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: SQL Server memory is limited.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Configuration for SQL Server memory usage;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Checking if SQL Server memory is configured to reserve minimum memory.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Installing the central administration site or primary site, requires SQL
Server to reserve a minimum of 8 gigabytes (GB) of memory.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> WARN: SQL Server minimum memory is 8000 MB.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;    SQL Server process memory allocation;
Warning;    Configuration Manager requires SQL Server to reserve a minimum of 8 gigabytes (GB) of memory for the central administration site and primary site and a minimum of 4 gigabytes (GB) for the secondary site. This memory is reserved by
using the Minimum server memory setting under Server Memory Options and is configured by using SQL Server Management Studio. For more information about how to set a fixed amount of memory, see
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/p/?LinkId=233759.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Case-insensitive collation on SQL Server;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Check Machine FQDN: <INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int>.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: getaddrinfo returned success.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Validate FQDN of SQL Server Computer;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO:CheckSupportedFQDNFormat <INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: NetBIOS <INFPROSCCMCDB>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Primary FQDN;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: Site Upgrade Requirements>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking if the target ConfigMgr site is ready to upgrade...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: Database Upgrade Requirements>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking the target ConfigMgr database is ready to upgrade...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> ===== INFO: Prerequisite Type & Server: SDK:INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int
=====
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: Access Permissions>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking access permissions...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: The rule 'Administrative rights on site system' has been run on server 'INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int',
skipped.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: System Requirements>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking system requirements for ConfigMgr...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: The rule 'Unsupported site server operating system version for Setup' has
been run on server 'INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int', skipped.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: The rule 'Domain membership' has been run on server 'INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int',
skipped.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Windows Cluster not found on INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int.
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;
Windows Failover Cluster;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFO: The rule 'Pending system restart' has been run on server 'INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int',
skipped.
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<RuleCategory: Dependent Components>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking dependent components for ConfigMgr...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;
Windows Deployment Tools installed;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFO: CheckAdkWinPeInstalled on INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int.
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;    Windows Preinstallation Environment
installed;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;
SMS Provider machine has same domain as site server;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<RuleCategory: Site Upgrade Requirements>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking if the target ConfigMgr site is ready to upgrade...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<RuleCategory: Database Upgrade Requirements>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking the target ConfigMgr database is ready to upgrade...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> ***************************************************
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> ******* Prerequisite checking is completed. *******
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> ******************************************<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFO: Updating
Prerequisite checking result into the registry
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFO: Connecting to INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int registry
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFO: Setting registry values
If you wonder whether it might be related to this error:
-2014 02:07:00> INFO: Detected current installed build version [7711] for sitecode [BRA]. For Upgrade, minimum supported installed build version is [7804].
I confirm that this one site is a secondary one that's attached to a primary site and this log is from the CAS server, I managed to tall it and delete it from that site, but still appears listed
on the CAS management console, any idea how to force the removal of a secondary site that's attached to a primary from the CAS site when it has been removed already from said primary?
I've already tried the
Preinst /DELSITE XXX command but it only works when the site to remove it's attached to the local site and certainly not from a CAS
Finally, the version, build number and everything is correct, no idea what could be the problem, does anybody know a way to bypass this or force the re-evaluation of this rules, I've got
the impression that it's being cached somehow.
Any help would be highly appreciated,
Thank you.
Marcelo Estrada MCP-MCTS-MCITP-MCSA-MCSE

Hello again everybody,
I've finally managed to fix this up, in the end I had to delete those entries manually from the database as Garry suggested. After this was done the upgrade has gone through as expected with no further ado and has finalized already, now moving on to the
primary sites.
If anybody out there is facing the same issue, what I did was to delete those "stubborn" records executing the following statements over the CAS database:
DELETE
FROMServerDataWHERESiteCode='XXX'
DELETE
FROMSC_SiteDefinitionWHERESiteCode='XXX'
And this is pretty much about it. I'd recommend to take a proper backup first though as best practice.
Thank you all anyways for your answers and comments,
Marcelo Estrada MCP-MCTS-MCITP-MCSA-MCSE

Error Message: "This upgrade path is not supported"

Scenario
During the process of upgrade to Windows 10 Technical Preview, we may encounter the error “This upgrade path is not supported. Please close Setup and re-launch from the root of the media or go back and pick a different installation
choice.” in the Compatibility report.
Analysis
Step 1: Perform the scenario 1: the upgrade installation fails.
Reproduce this error following the steps below:
Download the Windows 10 Technical Preview ISO installation file.
Extract the ISO installation file to C:\New folder, and now the location of the installation file is
C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\.
Click setup.exe from the installation file, and then click
Install now.
Setup is starting, and then get two options Upgrade and
Custom which is the classic setup wizard which we can see during booting from DVD.
Click Upgrade to run upgrade installation, however, the error occurs.
It seems that it is impossible to perform upgrade installation to Windows 10 Technical Preview, although it is fine to click
Custom to perform clean installation which cannot keep the personal setting and applications.
However, what we want is upgrade installation, not clean installation.
Step 2: Perform the scenario 2: the upgrade installation works fine.
If extract the ISO installation to C:\New in the above step2, click the
setup.exe from the installation file C:\New\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\, the upgrade installation would work fine, which is as shown the following two figures:
Step 3: Check the setupact.log
file which contains information about setup actions during the installation of the two scenarios.
Scenario 1: Check the setupact.log file of the scenario 1. The detailed information is shown as below:
2014-10-14 19:03:40, Info UI Determining whether we should run ConX or legacy setup
2014-10-14 19:03:42, Info UI Will launch ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:03:42, Info UI Launching ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:03:42, Info UI Launching C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\SetupPrep.exe
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI Unknown command line for ConX setup experience. Launching legacy setup experience.
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI Determining if we are in WDS/Unattend mode
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI No need to hide autorun
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info [0x0a000a] UI Autorun:Autorun core successfully initialized!!!
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info [0x0a000b] UI Autorun:Autorun UI successfully initialized!!!
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI AppWindow has layout style 0
2014-10-14 19:03:45, Info UI NavWindow has layout style 0
2014-10-14 19:03:45, Info [0x0a011c] UI WizardDialogPost::SetActive
2014-10-14 19:04:57, Info [0x0a018e] UI Passing command line parameter ("C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\setup.exe /HideWelcome /uilanguage:en-US /targetlanguage:en-US") to IBS.
Scenario 2: Check the setupact.log file of the scenario 2. The detailed information is shown as below:
2014-10-14 19:08:04, Info UI Determining whether we should run ConX or legacy setup
2014-10-14 19:08:05, Info UI Will launch ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:08:05, Info UI Launching ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:08:05, Info UI Launching C:\New\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\SetupPrep.exe
According to the two logs, we can get the following points:
In scenario 1, it would invoke the SetupPrep.exe in the source folder directly to perform an installation preparation. However, it failed to recognize the path
C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\SetupPrep.exe. Then it would launch legacy setup.
In the scenario 2, Windows setup would be redirected to the ConX setup to perform upgrade installation automatically.
So, what is the difference of the scenario 1 and 2 to bring the different results of upgrade installation?
Workaround
Based on lots of testing, we find that if there is no space in the extracting location of the ISO installation
file, the upgrade installation would work fine.
What’s more, we can get the meaning of the two setup models in the setupact.log:
Legacy setup: it is same with setup from DVD boot.
ConX setup: it would check the compatibility and language UI for upgrade preparation, then perform migration and upgrade directly.
Additional Resource
From the release of Windows 10 Technical Preview, many users have installed and tested Windows 10 Technical Preview, we still hope more and more users would download and install Windows 10 Technical Preview for test, and provide
us your feedback.
Download Windows Technical Preview
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/preview-iso
Download Windows Technical Preview for Enterprise
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/evaluate-windows-technical-preview-for-enterprise
Please click to vote if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Hello,
I would guess that existence of a space in the folder name is what the issue is. Try removing the space from the folder name and see if works. New_Folder for example
Thanks, Darrell Gorter [MSFT] This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

I am trying to upgrade EPM 8.9(8.49.23) to EPM 9.1 (8.53.08). During dataconversion step the AE process finished succssfully in few seconds. When i see the log it says "There are no conversions to run for upgrade path PF89 (18028,10003)". Please let me kn

I am trying to upgrade EPM 8.9(8.49.23) to EPM 9.1 (8.53.08). During dataconversion step the AE process finished succssfully in few seconds. When i see the log it says "There are no conversions to run for upgrade path PF89 (18028,10003)". Please let me know why it didnt do any conversion. Am i missing something?

yes, that app engine didnt inserted any rows. So now when i tried to drill down i found that there was no data in the "new demo" database on table UPG_DATACONV. That is the reason for all this.
When i applied required for upgrade patch in demo it said couple of patch already exists so those update i skipped. Now when i check upd877654 has a step which imports the data in this table. my change assistant told that the update is already available in my demo so i skipped. Now i am not sure what to do.
I tried reimporting the data and running the analyzer again. But worried that there can be any issues due to this.

11i to R12 upgrade

Hi,
I am doing test upgrade 11.5.10.2 to 12.1.1
I am following R12 upgrade guide and 1211 install guide. I finished rapid install step "Creating the Upgrade File System". Now my next step is to perform upgrade (apply upgrade drivers).
It is not clear in the documents and patch readme if I need to apply patches to 11i APPL_TOP or newly created R12 file system. Can somebody help me?
Thanks.

Which document says I need to apply only database driver? So far I have reviewed upgrade guide Part No. E14010-01.In the Same upgrade guide part NO:E14010-01 check the page no:73 it given as follows:
Under Section 3 "Upgrading to Release 12.1.1"
10. Run the American English upgrade patch driver (required)
Applies to 11i release level: All
TUMS step key: N/A
To bring your database to the full Oracle Applications Release 12.1.1 level, use AutoPatch to run the (American English) unified driver (u6678700.drv). It is located in $AU_TOP/patch/115/driver.
Run the driver on the administration server node on your Release 12.1.1 APPL_TOP
using the following commands:
$ adpatch options=nocopyportion,nogenerateportion
Do I need to start database in new R12 file system.Yes. All the steps mentioned under Section 3.9 onwards need to perform in the new 12.1 Oracle _home
-Rk
Edited by: rkthanga on Jul 2, 2010 1:00 PM

R12 Upgrade Report from 11i Getting Error

Hi everyone,
We are currently working an R12 upgrade project from 11.5.10 to 12.1.3. I am currently converting a report from 11i to R12 but it is erroring out when I run it in R12. Below is the log. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Payables: Version : 12.0.0
Copyright (c) 1979, 1999, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
XXHH_APXNACHA_CHASE module: XXHH: NACHA Payment Format Chase (HHG)
Current system time is 06-DEC-2011 15:52:03
+-----------------------------
| Starting concurrent program execution...
+-----------------------------
Arguments
P_PAYMENT_BATCH='JRG120111b'
Current NLS_LANG and NLS_NUMERIC_CHARACTERS Environment Variables are :
American_America.US7ASCII
Enter Password:
MSG-00001: Org ID: 141
MSG-00001: After SRWINIT
MSG-00099: Inside Get_Company_Name
MSG-00099: Payment Batch = JRG120111b
MSG-00099: No reporting entity setup found.
REP-1419: 'beforereport': PL/SQL program aborted.
REP-0069: Internal error
REP-57054: In-process job terminated:Terminated with error:
REP-1419: MSG-00001: Org ID: 141
MSG-00001: After SRWINIT
MSG-00099: Inside Get_Company_Name
MSG-00099: Payment Batch = JRG120111b
MSG-00099: No reporting entity setup found.
REP-1419: 'beforereport': PL/SQL program aborted.
Report Builder: Release 10.1.2.3.0 - Production on Tue Dec 6 15:52:04 2011
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Start of log messages from FND_FILE
End of log messages from FND_FILE
Program exited with status 1
Concurrent Manager encountered an error while running Oracle*Report for your concurrent request 3660174.
Review your concurrent request log and/or report output file for more detailed information.
Executing request completion options...
Output file size:
0
Finished executing request completion options.
Concurrent request completed
Current system time is 06-DEC-2011 15:52:06
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

It looks as though its failing in your beforereport trigger.
MSG-00099: Inside Get_Company_Name
MSG-00099: Payment Batch = JRG120111b
MSG-00099: No reporting entity setup found.
REP-1419: 'beforereport': PL/SQL program aborted.I dont believe payment batches are used anymore as they need to be done via Payment profiles and therefore you will need to use Payment Instruction ids instead. Also the setup at R12 is Mosaic
try including this. as the first statement in the Beforereport trigger. All the banks tables payment tables has changed so unless you have changed these to you will need to adjust these correctly to the R12 tables.
BEGIN
MO_GLOBAL.INIT ('SQLAP');
MO_GLOBAL.SET_POLICY_CONTEXT('S',FND_PROFILE.VALUE('ORG_ID'));
END;

Discoverer Reports does not work in Multi-org Environment after R12 Upgrade

Discoverer Reports does not work in Multi-org Environment after R12 Upgrade. Created a simple report using the below query:
SELECT po_header_id, segment1, type_lookup_code
FROM po_headers
WHERE segment1 = '5000002'
Query works perfectly fine; when i set the ORG_CONTEXT in the database using the command:
EXEC mo_global.set_policy_context('S',129)
But the report doesn't fetch any data when ran from an Org based responsibility. We've ensured that the MO: Operting Unit is set accurately and general Oracle reports (PLSQL Program OR XML Publisher) are working perfectly fine.
===========
I followed the steps provided in Metalink Note: 732826.1 - It works for some responsibilities where the MO: Security Profile is not set; but fails for those responsibilities where the MO: Security Profile is set.
I am looking for specific solution that works irrespective of either the MO: Operating Unit profile is set of not.
Please suggest. Appreciate your response.
Thanks,
Kesava Chunduri

Hi Hussein,
Thanks for the quick response.
Yes, I've gone thru both the notes specified below:
Discoverer Workbooks Based On Organization Enabled Views Are Not Populated [ID 1293438.1]
- Tried this option; but this option is messing up a couple of Oracle Standard Functionalities.
- For ex: If i set this profile option; we are not able to create any receipts using Custom Responsibilities.
I am able to create the receipt, when i remove this profile option.
No Data Shows for Reports in Discoverer 10g with Applications Release 12 [ID 1054380.1]
- I see that the products i am running these reports from AR/GL - already exists in these tables.
Anything other options??
Thanks,
Kesava

Error while applying patch u4440000.drv(part of R12 upgrade from 11.5.10.2)

Hi All,
Getting error while applying patch 4440000
cd $AU_TOP/patch/115/driver/u4440000.drv
ERROR:
Failed: XDOLoader.class on worker 1
Failed: CustMigrationTool.class on worker 2
Failed: XDOLoader.class on worker 3
Failed: XDOLoader.class on worker 4
Worker 2 log file:*
Start time for file is: Tue Jun 23 2009 00:14:02
adjava -ms128m -mx256m -nojit oracle.jrad.migration.cust.CustMigrationTool ak % -customer_cust -username &un_apps @ -password &pw_apps -dbconnection &jdbc_db_addr -jrad_username &un_apps @ -jrad_password &pw_apps -jrad_dbconnection &jdbc_db_addr -rootpackage "/oracle/apps/ak/" -migrationdir &fullpath_ak_mds_directory
Copyright (c) 2002 Oracle Corporation
Redwood Shores, California, USA
AD Java
Version 12.0.0
NOTE: You may not use this utility for custom development
unless you have written permission from Oracle Corporation.
Reading product information from file...
Reading language and territory information from file...
Reading language information from applUS.txt ...
Temporarily resetting CLASSPATH to:
"/u01/CESERP/app/apps/apps_st/appl/ad/12.0.0/java/adjava.zip:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/dt.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/tools.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/lib/rt.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/apps_st/comn/java/lib/appsborg.zip:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java/frmall.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/ewt3.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/j2ee/OC4J_BI_Forms/applications/formsapp/formsweb/WEB-INF/lib/frmsrv.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes"
Calling /u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/bin/java ...
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/jrad/migration/cust/CustMigrationTool
AD Worker error:
The above program failed. See the error messages listed
above, if any, or see the log and output files for the program.
Worker 1 log file:_
Start time for file is: Tue Jun 23 2009 00:14:02
adjava -ms128m -mx256m -nojit oracle.apps.xdo.oa.util.XDOLoader UPLOAD -DB_USERNAME &un_apps -DB_PASSWORD &pw_apps -JDBC_CONNECTION &jdbc_db_addr -LOB_TYPE TEMPLATE_SOURCE -APPS_SHORT_NAME AHL -LOB_CODE AHL_RA_ANZ_PRC_PLN_DAY -LANGUAGE en -TERRITORY US -XDO_FILE_TYPE RTF -TRANSLATE Y -FILE_NAME &fullpath:ahl:patch/115/publisher/templates/US:AHLRAT3.rtf
Copyright (c) 2002 Oracle Corporation
Redwood Shores, California, USA
AD Java
Version 12.0.0
NOTE: You may not use this utility for custom development
unless you have written permission from Oracle Corporation.
Reading product information from file...
Reading language and territory information from file...
Reading language information from applUS.txt ...
Temporarily resetting CLASSPATH to:
"/u01/CESERP/app/apps/apps_st/appl/ad/12.0.0/java/adjava.zip:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/dt.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/tools.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/lib/rt.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/apps_st/comn/java/lib/appsborg.zip:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java/frmall.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/ewt3.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/j2ee/OC4J_BI_Forms/applications/formsapp/formsweb/WEB-INF/lib/frmsrv.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes"
Calling /u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/bin/java ...
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/sun/java/util/collections/Comparator
AD Worker error:
The above program failed. See the error messages listed
above, if any, or see the log and output files for the program.
Time when worker failed: Tue Jun 23 2009 00:14:03
Worker 3 log file:*
Start time for file is: Tue Jun 23 2009 00:14:02
adjava -ms128m -mx256m -nojit oracle.apps.xdo.oa.util.XDOLoader UPLOAD -DB_USERNAME &un_apps -DB_PASSWORD &pw_apps -JDBC_CONNECTION &jdbc_db_addr -LOB_TYPE TEMPLATE_SOURCE -APPS_SHORT_NAME AHL -LOB_CODE AHL_RA_ANZ_PRC_PLN_SUMM -LANGUAGE en -TERRITORY US -XDO_FILE_TYPE RTF -TRANSLATE Y -FILE_NAME &fullpath:ahl:patch/115/publisher/templates/US:AHLRAT4.rtf
Copyright (c) 2002 Oracle Corporation
Redwood Shores, California, USA
AD Java
Version 12.0.0
NOTE: You may not use this utility for custom development
unless you have written permission from Oracle Corporation.
Reading product information from file...
Reading language and territory information from file...
Reading language information from applUS.txt ...
Temporarily resetting CLASSPATH to:
"/u01/CESERP/app/apps/apps_st/appl/ad/12.0.0/java/adjava.zip:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/dt.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/tools.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/lib/rt.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/apps_st/comn/java/lib/appsborg.zip:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java/frmall.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/ewt3.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/j2ee/OC4J_BI_Forms/applications/formsapp/formsweb/WEB-INF/lib/frmsrv.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes"
Calling /u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/bin/java ...
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/sun/java/util/collections/Comparator
AD Worker error:
The above program failed. See the error messages listed
above, if any, or see the log and output files for the program.
Time when worker failed: Tue Jun 23 2009 00:14:03
Worker 4 log file:_
Start time for file is: Tue Jun 23 2009 00:14:01
adjava -ms128m -mx256m -nojit oracle.apps.xdo.oa.util.XDOLoader UPLOAD -DB_USERNAME &un_apps -DB_PASSWORD &pw_apps -JDBC_CONNECTION &jdbc_db_addr -LOB_TYPE TEMPLATE_SOURCE -APPS_SHORT_NAME AHL -LOB_CODE AHLPRDWC -LANGUAGE en -TERRITORY US -XDO_FILE_TYPE RTF -TRANSLATE Y -FILE_NAME &fullpath:ahl:patch/115/publisher/templates/US:AHLPRDWC1.rtf
Copyright (c) 2002 Oracle Corporation
Redwood Shores, California, USA
AD Java
Version 12.0.0
NOTE: You may not use this utility for custom development
unless you have written permission from Oracle Corporation.
Reading product information from file...
Reading language and territory information from file...
Reading language information from applUS.txt ...
Temporarily resetting CLASSPATH to:
"/u01/CESERP/app/apps/apps_st/appl/ad/12.0.0/java/adjava.zip:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/dt.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/tools.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/lib/rt.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/apps_st/comn/java/lib/appsborg.zip:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java/frmall.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/ewt3.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/j2ee/OC4J_BI_Forms/applications/formsapp/formsweb/WEB-INF/lib/frmsrv.jar:/u01/CESERP/app/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes"
Calling /u01/CESERP/app/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/bin/java ...
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/sun/java/util/collections/Comparator
AD Worker error:
The above program failed. See the error messages listed
above, if any, or see the log and output files for the program.
Time when worker failed: Tue Jun 23 2009 00:14:02
Please let me know any solution
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Bhanu Chander.

Hi,
As a part of R12 upgrade.
once The Installation creates APPL_TOP, COMMON_TOP, INST_TOP and 10g Oracle Home
Now we are connected to R12 application.
Applied patch AD.A 4502962.
Run the American English upgrade patch driver
cd $AU_TOP/patch/115/driver
adpatch options=nocopyportion,nogenerateportion
Please enter the name of your AutoPatch driver file: u4440000.drv
This patch doesn't have readme it will be under cd $AU_TOP/patch/115/driver
Thanks,
Bhanu Chander

Not able to run adadmin adfter installing R12 Upgrade file system

Sawwan,
Now we are doing 11i apps to R12 upgrade single node, before we did database upgrade 9i to 10.2.0.4,
I successfully installed R12 upgrade file system with out any errors, i have chagned the
new Installation creates APPL_TOP, COMMON_TOP, INST_TOP and 10g Oracle Home
i moved the new environment file into .bash_profile
mv .bash_profile .bash_profile_11.5.10
Iset the R12 environment , When ever i tried to run adadmin system manager password is not taking its giving error
[applupg@peabody appl]$ adadmin
Copyright (c) 2002 Oracle Corporation
Redwood Shores, California, USA
Oracle Applications AD Administration
Version 12.0.0
NOTE: You may not use this utility for custom development
unless you have written permission from Oracle Corporation.
Your default directory is '/u01/R12/apps/apps_st/appl'.
Is this the correct APPL_TOP [Yes] ?
AD Administration records your AD Administration session in a text file
you specify. Enter your AD Administration log file name or press [Return]
to accept the default file name shown in brackets.
Filename [adadmin.log] :
************* Start of AD Administration session *************
AD Administration version: 12.0.0
AD Administration started at: Sat Apr 18 2009 06:12:52
APPL_TOP is set to /u01/R12/apps/apps_st/appl
Backing up restart files, if any......Done.
Your previous AD Administration session did not run to completion.
Do you wish to continue with your previous AD Administration session [Yes] ?
You are about to use or modify Oracle Applications product tables
in your ORACLE database 'upg'
using ORACLE executables in '/u01/R12/apps/tech_st/10.1.2'.
Is this the correct database [Yes] ?
AD Administration needs the password for your 'SYSTEM' ORACLE schema
in order to determine your installation configuration.
Enter the password for your 'SYSTEM' ORACLE schema: manager
...Unable to connect.
AD Administration error:
The following ORACLE error:
ORA-12541: TNS:no listener
occurred while executing the SQL statement:
CONNECT SYSTEM/*****
AD Administration error:
Unable to connect to 'SYSTEM'; password may be invalid.
AD Administration needs the password for your 'SYSTEM' ORACLE schema
in order to determine your installation configuration.
Enter the password for your 'SYSTEM' ORACLE schema:
Enter the password for your 'SYSTEM' ORACLE schema:
Before running R12 adadmin is there nessary 11i apps servicess should up or down..
Edited by: HumanDBA on May 5, 2009 12:26 PM

Sawwan,
As a oracle user i am able to see the tns_admin home dir
[oraupg@peabody upg_peabody]$ echo $TNS_ADMIN
/stage/10gsoftware/network/admin/upg_peabody
[oraupg@peabody upg_peabody]$
After installing R12 uprade file system i am able do the tnsping
[applupg@peabody appl]$ tnsping upg
TNS Ping Utility for Linux: Version 10.1.0.5.0 - Production on 18-APR-2009 06:26:49
Copyright (c) 1997, 2003, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Used parameter files:
Used TNSNAMES adapter to resolve the alias
Attempting to contact (DESCRIPTION= (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=peabody)(PORT=1526)) (CONNECT_DATA=(SID=upg)))
TNS-12541: TNS:no listener
[applupg@peabody appl]$
[applupg@peabody appl]$ sqlplus apps/xxxx@upg
SQL*Plus: Release 10.1.0.5.0 - Production on Sat Apr 18 06:29:45 2009
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
ERROR:
ORA-12541: TNS:no listener
Enter user-name:
========================================
Sawwan
after installing i am trying to apply R12.AD.B patch, do we need to apply this patch in 11i fiile system or New R12 file system, for 11i file system i am not getting any issue, but when ever i set the R12 new file system enviroment file then only i am not able to connect the database,i have changed new port numbers in R12 file system, is that causing any issues..?
Edited by: HumanDBA on May 5, 2009 12:37 PM

Windows 8.1, Update 1 upgrade path

Hi, if there is anyone of any influence who might read this, please, please, for you own sakes make an upgrade path directly from Windows 8.0 --> Windows 8.1, Update 1
I cannot upgrade from W8.0 --> 8.1.
I cannot upgrade due the the following error. But I believe it is a silly error and can be overcome as some have managed:
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20131018074442AAswJqp
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows8_1-windows_install/windows-81-install-unable-to-create-ramdisk/887b5adc-86ce-4c37-9c58-72eca5f712d4?page=8&tm=1396807793681
I even had a MS 3rd line Andswer Desk (ref:1233447567.) guy who was remote controlling my machine trying clean boot give up after saying that if my
MB manufacturer wont support drivers past Vista then there is nothing they "should" do... But Vista is EoS but not extended support as XP is, that ends 2017:
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/lifecycle
This is an issue I'm having with my personal PC but I also work in IT infrastructure and I think this needs to be sorted. This is going to become a BIG issue for many other people who have Vista/XP-grade systems with the requirements for 8.1.1 who will try
to upgrade.
Please can someone help?
System: Q6600, MB: XFX Nvidia Nforce 680i LT, 8GB RAM

Hi,
Windows 8.1 do have have higher requirements for hardware, If your computer hardeware device was too old, you may encounter some problem during install or using Windows 8.1.
Roger Lu
TechNet Community Support

Upgrade Path from 5.1.4

We are currently running version 5.1.4 and are looking to upgrade. What is the recommended upgrade path or version we should be planning to go to? Our pipeline isn't very complicated since I've read some articles about there not being a direct migration to version 3.0. We currently develop using the RAD toolkit and .NET if that is a factor when upgrading.
Also if someone could clarify which packages I'm looking at migrating to as before I installed Endeca IAP and Dev Studio and I was up and running. I don't see those packages in the newer versions of the software and I'm not 100% on what the packages were renamed to after the transition to Oracle.

It sounds like you are upgrading an Endeca Commerce / Guided Search implementation. This forum is for Oracle Endeca Information Discovery (EID) products. You will get better answers over on the other forum, https://forums.oracle.com/community/developer/english/endeca_experience_management/technical_questions .

R12 upgrade path

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for