R1213 Patch 9239090 fails
Hi Team
I am applying the patch 9239090 to upgrade R12.1.1 to R12.1.3 getting the following error.
All of the workers failed.
patch log file:
============
Nearly more than 100 Oracle Reports objects did not generate successfully:
ar reports/US RAXAVR.rdf
ar reports/US ARZCARPO.rdf
ar reports/US ARZACS.rdf
ar reports/US RAXARL.rdf
ar reports/US RAXCUS.rdf
ar reports/US RAXCBR.rdf
ar reports/US RAXCUSLR.rdf
ar reports/US RAXIIR.rdf
An error occurred while generating Oracle Reports files.
Continue as if it were successful [No] :
===================
one of the adwork001.log file
====================
You are running adrepgen
Header information is:
$Header: aiofgr.lc 120.7.12010000.1 2008/07/25 08:10:32 appldev ship $
Start of adrepgen session
Date/Time is Tue May 10 2011 16:56:48
Filelist file is: /u01/oracle/APP12DEV/apps/apps_st/appl/admin/APP12DEV/out/pwlapp001.txt
Database connect string is: APPS/*****
Temporarily resetting REPORTS_PATH to:
"/u01/oracle/APP12DEV/apps/apps_st/appl/au/12.0.0/plsql:/u01/oracle/APP12DEV/apps/apps_st/appl/fnd/12.0.0/reports"
Generating Oracle Reports files...
Generating report "WIPUTACS.rdf" with command:
/u01/oracle/APP12DEV/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/bin/rwconverter userid=APPS/*****
source=/u01/oracle/APP12DEV/apps/apps_st/appl/wip/12.0.0/reports/US/WIPUTACS.rdf
dest=/u01/oracle/APP12DEV/apps/apps_st/appl/admin/APP12DEV/out/tmp001.rdf stype=rdffile dtype=rdffile overwrite=yes batch=yes compile_all=yes
X connection to localhost:15.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).
Report Builder: Release 10.1.2.3.0 - Production on Tue May 10 16:56:52 2011
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
ERROR [code=1] generating report "WIPUTACS.rdf" from input file
/u01/oracle/APP12DEV/apps/apps_st/appl/wip/12.0.0/reports/US/WIPUTACS.rdf
Generated 0 files successfully.
Generated 0 files with non-fatal warnings.
Generated 1 files with fatal errors.
adrepgen is exiting with status 1
End of adrepgen session
Date/time is Tue May 10 2011 17:00:52
========================
Can any body help me on this please
Thanks
Kesav
dest=/u01/oracle/APP12DEV/apps/apps_st/appl/admin/APP12DEV/out/tmp001.rdf stype=rdffile dtype=rdffile overwrite=yes batch=yes compile_all=yes
X connection to localhost:15.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).Please set the DISPLAY manually before you generate the form (run adpatch) and try then.
Many Reports are failinmg during generation via adadmin Utility [ID 811144.1]
X Display Server Connection Broken When Printing Reports [ID 230810.1]
Thanks,
Hussein
Similar Messages
-
Patch 9239090 - ORA-04021: timeout occurred while waiting to lock object
Hello Guys,
I need help urgently to comlete an upgrade of ebs 12.1.1 to 12.1.3.
We are upgrading ebs 11i to 12i going live this weekend. We have encountered "ORA-04021: timeout occurred while waiting to lock object" on patch 9239090 with two Workers:
In adctrl:
1 Run AutoPatch R120 AFUTLGRS.pls FAILED
2 Run AutoPatch R120 AFUTLOGS.pls FAILED
sqlplus -s APPS/***** @/u02/applfinp/apps/apps_st/appl/admin/OFPROD/out/p001invok.sql
Connected.
create or replace package wf_bes_cleanup AUTHID CURRENT_USER as
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-04021: timeout occurred while waiting to lock object
I have done everything everything imaginable but cannot get pass these 2 failed workers.
1) I have checked are there are no locks blocking on any objects:
select s1.username || '@' || s1.machine
|| ' ( SID=' || s1.sid || ' ) is blocking '
|| s2.username || '@' || s2.machine || ' ( SID=' || s2.sid || ' ) ' AS blocking_status
from v$lock l1, v$session s1, v$lock l2, v$session s2
where s1.sid=l1.sid and s2.sid=l2.sid
and l1.BLOCK=1 and l2.request > 0
and l1.id1 = l2.id1
and l2.id2 = l2.id2 ;
2) I also checked and there is space in the database.
3) From adctrl, I have tried restarting the jobs one by one but the worker 1 hangs at and eventually fails on several (12) attempts.
4) The solution on Doc ID 1291064.1 is not the problem:
SQL> select SUPPLEMENTAL_LOG_DATA_MIN, SUPPLEMENTAL_LOG_DATA_PK, SUPPLEMENTAL_LOG_DATA_UI, FORCE_LOGGING
from v$database;
SUPPLEME SUP SUP FOR
NO NO NO NO
5) Manual execution still gave ORA-04021:
sqlplus -s APPS/apps @/u02/applfinp/apps/apps_st/appl/admin/OFPROD/out/p001invok.sql
sqlplus -s APPS/apps @/u02/applfinp/apps/apps_st/appl/admin/OFPROD/out/p002invok.sql
6) The alert log has no related errors
7) I Finally, after over 6 hours of waiting, I could only get the patch to continue after by using adctrl option 8 to skip these two workers.
After proceeding, I have yet hit two more errors and now stuck:
I have hit another error with the same patch:
create or replace package body FND_LOG as
/* $Header: AFUTLOGB.pls 120 ...
AD Worker error:
ORA-04021: timeout occurred while waiting to lock object
Unable to process file in PACKAGE mode.
Not converting file for Invoker's Rights because it appears to be a package body creation script (based on the filename).
File is: /u02/applfinp/apps/apps_st/appl/fnd/12.0.0/patch/115/sql/AFUTLOGB.pls
AD Worker warning:
Product Data File
/u02/applfinp/apps/apps_st/appl/admin/xniprod.txt
does not exist for product "xni".
This product is registered in the database but the above file does not exist in APPL_TOP. The product will be ignored without error
AD Worker error:
The following ORACLE error:
ORA-04063: package body "APPS.FND_LOG" has errors
ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called: "APPS.FND_LOG"
ORA-06512: at "APPS.FND_FUNCTION", line 834
ORA-06512: at "APPS.FND_MENU_ENTRIES_C_DELTRG", line 4
ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger 'APPS.FND_MENU_ENTRIES_C_DELTRG'
Can I stop and restart this patch 9239090?Hello,
I later executed the failed jobs or scripts manually (successfully) for the patch to continue
sqlplus -s APPS/apps @/u02/applfinp/apps/apps_st/appl/admin/OFPROD/out/p001invok.sql
sqlplus -s APPS/apps @/u02/applfinp/apps/apps_st/appl/admin/OFPROD/out/p002invok.sql
The patch ended with the following :
The following Oracle Reports objects did not generate successfully:
ap reports/US APXARATE.rdf
ar reports/US ARXCTA.rdf
fa reports/US FASRSVED.rdf
ont reports/US OEXOEORD.rdf
pa reports/US PAXACMPT.rdf
pa reports/US PAXALRUN.rdf
pa reports/US PAXACRPT.rdf
pa reports/US PAXCPGAL.rdf
pa reports/US PAXPCRFD.rdf
The patch execution ended but the patch number is not record in apps.ad_bugs table:
select TO_CHAR(CREATION_DATE,'dd-Mon-yyyy, hh24:mm:ss'), BUG_NUMBER from apps.ad_bugs where bug_number in ('9239090');
no rows selected
JFI
Patches located in ad_applied_patches to which there is no a corresponding record in ad_bugs:
SQL> SELECT a.patch_name, TO_CHAR(max(a.last_update_date),'dd-Mon-yyyy, hh24:mm:ss')
2 FROM applsys.ad_applied_patches a
3 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT '1'
4 FROM ad_bugs b
5 WHERE b.bug_number = a.patch_name)
6 group by a.patch_name;
PATCH_NAME TO_CHAR(MAX(A.LAST_UP
9239090 26-Oct-2013, 00:10:27
AutoConfig 25-Oct-2013, 17:10:51
merger9179588 25-Oct-2013, 11:10:30
merger_post_5903765 27-Apr-2013, 23:04:45
mergeu6678700 25-Oct-2013, 16:10:09
What could have happened that this was not recorded in ad_bugs?
How to I get this recorded in the ad_bugs table?
Thanks
Mathias -
How to skip EGO product before applying patch 9239090 (12.1.3)
Hi All,
i am applying patch 9239090 (12.1.3) on my system OUL5x64 EBS 12.1.1 db:11.1.0.7
when upgraded to 12.1.1, got error on EGO product and i had to skipped this product because we do not have it installed and now upgrade to 12.1.3 got the same error on this product.and had to skip this product again.
here is the error:
sqlplus -s APPS/***** @/TEST/apps/apps_st/appl/ego/12.0.0/patch/115/sql/EGOSILDU.sql &un_ego
DECLARE
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02149: Specified partition does not exist
ORA-06512: at line 408
question:How can i disable this product before applying the patch 9239090 so the upgrade process can continue un-interrupted.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,is there any ways that i can do it before apply the patch 9239090 so the process will not require user interact. we patch the system at night and if it fails, we will waste few hours till the morning before it can continue running again.The only way would be commenting the line in the patch driver which initiates EGOSILDU.sql script (if possible), but this is not supported by Oracle Support.
Thanks,
Hussein -
Every PATCH installation fails after installing Windows Updates
Hello,
I want to report an issue which I think is a Windows bug introduced by one of the Windows updates (unfortunately I wasn't able to find out which one of them).
Here is the test case:
1. install a fresh copy of Windows on a test machine
2. install all available Windows Updates (so the system is up to date)
3. create a sample MSI installer which only installs some dummy files (let's say Product Version 1.0.0) and host it on a web server
4. install the MSI from the online location using a command line like this:
msiexec /i http://server/share/package.msi
5. create a .MSP patch (e.g. v1.0.1) which only adds a new file to v1.0.0
6. install the v1.0.1 patch
RESULT: the patch installation fails with the following error message: "The filename , directory name , or volume label syntax is incorrect"
NOTES:
1. the issue was replicated on Windows 7 and 8 machines UP TO DATE
2. the issue is not replicated on a fresh installation of Windows without Updates applied
Is there anyone aware of what could cause this error? Once again the patch installation fails only on Windows machines with the latest Updates installed.
Thx,
DanielHello,
I want to report an issue which I think is a Windows bug introduced by one of the Windows updates (unfortunately I wasn't able to find out which one of them).
Here is the test case:
1. install a fresh copy of Windows on a test machine
2. install all available Windows Updates (so the system is up to date)
3. create a sample MSI installer which only installs some dummy files (let's say Product Version 1.0.0) and host it on a web server
4. install the MSI from the online location using a command line like this:
msiexec /i http://server/share/package.msi
5. create a .MSP patch (e.g. v1.0.1) which only adds a new file to v1.0.0
6. install the v1.0.1 patch
RESULT: the patch installation fails with the following error message: "The filename , directory name , or volume label syntax is incorrect"
NOTES:
1. the issue was replicated on Windows 7 and 8 machines UP TO DATE
2. the issue is not replicated on a fresh installation of Windows without Updates applied
Is there anyone aware of what could cause this error? Once again the patch installation fails only on Windows machines with the latest Updates installed.
Thx,
Daniel -
Hi friends,
As a part of BIAPPS-ODI configuration, @ the step of Applying FMW patches biappshiphome patches is getting failed like in the final patching report im getting error like
----------START OF PATCHING REPORT------------------
* BIAPPSSHIPHOME Patching Report ..........
Patch Failed: fsclite_rel7mlr2_16424872.zip
Patch Failed: BISHIPHOME_11_1_1_7_0_GENERIC_130409_1210_16492220.zip
Patch Failed: atglite_rel7mlr5A_database_16239380.zip
Patch Failed: atglite_rel7mlr5_16480022.zip
Patch Failed: fsmlitedb_rel7mlr2_16424869.zip
Patch Failed: fsmlite_rel7mlr2_16424870.zip
Patch Failed: BISERVER_11_1_1_7_0_WINDOWS_X64_130326_2045_4_16583998.zip
Patch Failed: BIFNDN_11_1_1_7_0_WINDOWS_X64_130322_1000_5_16462147.zip
Since only the above BIAPPSSHIPHOME patches is failing, but the remaining oracle common patching, ODI patching got succeeded. Im getting issue only with the above BIAPPSSHIPHOME patches.
When i tried to view the log file im getting the error like
Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 11.1.0.9.9
Copyright (c) 2012, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Oracle Home : C:\Middleware\Oracle_BI1
Central Inventory : C:\Program Files\Oracle\Inventory
from : n/a
OPatch version : 11.1.0.9.9
OUI version : 11.1.0.9.0
Log file location : C:\Middleware\Oracle_BI1\cfgtoollogs\opatch\opatch2013-10-06_10-40-30AM_1.log
OPatch detects the Middleware Home as "C:\Middleware"
Log file location: C:\Middleware\Oracle_BI1\cfgtoollogs\opatch\opatch2013-10-06_10-40-30AM_1.log\
OPatch failed with error code = 73
What could be the issue for the above problem and how it can be solved.
Thanks
Regards,
SaroHi guys,
The issue is been resolved, once after renaming the file patch_locked which is located in the path
C:\Middleware\Oracle_BI1\.patch_storage
Finally I got those biappshiphome patches applied successfully
----------START OF PATCHING REPORT------------------
* BIAPPSSHIPHOME Patching Report ..........
Patch Succeded: fsclite_rel7mlr2_16424872.zip
Patch Succeded: BISHIPHOME_11_1_1_7_0_GENERIC_130409_1210_16492220.zip
Patch Succeded: atglite_rel7mlr5A_database_16239380.zip
Patch Succeded: atglite_rel7mlr5_16480022.zip
Patch Succeded: fsmlitedb_rel7mlr2_16424869.zip
Patch Succeded: fsmlite_rel7mlr2_16424870.zip
Patch Succeded: BISERVER_11_1_1_7_0_WINDOWS_X64_130326_2045_4_16583998.zip
Patch Succeded: BIFNDN_11_1_1_7_0_WINDOWS_X64_130322_1000_5_16462147.zip
* Oracle Common Patching Report ..........
Patch skipped since its already applied: p16433147_111170_Generic.zip
Patch skipped since its already applied: p16080773_111170_Generic.zip
Patch skipped since its already applied: Webservices_Patch-3-PS6RC3_bug-1648778
.zip
Patch skipped since its already applied: p16433036_111170_Generic.zip
Patch skipped since its already applied: JDEVADF_REL7MLR10-RT_16525527.zip
Patch skipped since its already applied: WebCenter_BP1REL7RC3_16311963.zip
Patch skipped since its already applied: fmw_diagnostics_14757820_2.zip
Patch skipped since its already applied: SOACOMMON_REL7B8_16438735.zip
* SOA Patching Report ..........
Not applying SOA Patches since SOA Home (SOA_HOME) value is not specified
* ODI Patching Report ..........
Patch skipped since its already applied: p16629917_111170_Generic.zip
* Weblogic Patching Report ..........
----------END OF PATCHING REPORT------------------
This final patching report log file is also located at: C:\patches\final_patchig_report.log
Regards,
Saro -
Patch 6372396 - FAILED: file FNDLIBR on worker + 6372396
Hi,
i cloned the apps and db.while applying 63772396 patch in windows env, i am getting "Patch 6372396 - FAILED: file FNDLIBR on worker 1" this error.
thanks in advance-ms128m -mx256m -Xrs oracle.aurora.server.tools.loadjava.LoadJavaMain -f -thin -user "APPS/*****@adam.muscat.org:1521:MMAPPS" D:\MMAPPS\mmappsappl\admin\MMAPPS\out\p001ldjva.jar
Calling D:\MMAPPS\mmappscomn\util\java\1.4\j2sdk1.4.2_04\bin\java.exe ...
Error:
Program exited with status 1
Cause: The program terminated, returning status code 1.
Action: Check your installation manual for the meaning of this code on this operating system.java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/aurora/util/tools/ToolException
at oracle.aurora.server.tools.loadjava.LoadJavaMain.<init>(LoadJavaMain.java:51)
at oracle.aurora.server.tools.loadjava.LoadJavaMain.main(LoadJavaMain.java:56)
Exception in thread "main"
AD Worker error:
The above program failed. See the error messages listed
above, if any, or see the log and output files for the program.
Time when worker failed: Wed Jan 06 2010 13:06:08
Manager says to quit.
Time when worker quit: Wed Jan 06 2010 13:08:26
AD Worker is complete.
Errors and warnings are listed in the log file
D:\MMAPPS\mmappsappl\admin\MMAPPS\log\adwork001.log
and in other log files in the same directory. -
I can't update my existing firefox 8.0.1 (when prompted by updater) to 9.0.1 on my new MacBook Pro OS X Lion. Update failed with 'patch apply failed' message.
resolved
-
Patching Always Fails on One WS Type
Since I've implemented Patch Management in my organization I've cycled through several different workstation types, but recently I'm having trouble with this past year's computer model in that patching always fails.
What is happening is that I have narrowed the patching down to doing the individual machines (HP dc7900). I'll select the patches I want to push go through the wizard using default settings and force the restart. The deployment process will go successfully but the install/launches will fail.
In the reporting I'll get a remediate.exe failure with a Windows error: Unknown error (0xffffffff) on the bundle package. On the workstation I'll get notification messages for every patch in the bundle. Overall ZCM status reporting says that the package was successfully deployed but in actuality absolutely zero updates are applied.
This happens the same for every dc7900 in our building which were set up using the same process as dc5700 and two generations of dc5800 workstations that all patch successfully. Has anyone run into a similar situation? Thanks!We make a new "source image" for each computer model that we have so different base images for the 5700, 5800 and 7900. All of our images are made with the same XP SP3 volume license and network deployed apps installed. The 57/5800 systems had Windows Updates enabled as "download and let me choose when to install" but with the 7900 we thought that we would be able to use Patch Management to deploy updates so on the image the updates were turned off, but we have since manually turned them back on to automatic to make sure they keep updating.
I did recently find out that this behavior also follows application bundles on these systems now. I usually deploy bundles as dynamic administrator but have read in another thread that deploying as system may cause less hassles but I haven't had a chance to test this yet. -
while running Firefox it comes on the screen saying security update so after it ties to update this comes on the screen "The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)" I am running Firefox 6.0 and don't seem to have any other issues with it but it asks me several times to do this update but still says it cant do it
I am running windows vistaIf files already have been downloaded then remove the files in the updates and updates\0 folder.
You can also delete the active-update.xml file.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Updates_reported_when_running_newest_version
Software Update not working properly:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Software_Update
* C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Local\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates -
Critical patch update fails with error code 73
RDBMS Version: 10.2.0.3
Operating System and Version: solaris 5.9
Error Number (if applicable): error code 73
Product (i.e. SQL*Loader, Import, etc.): oracle server enterpirse edition
Product Version: 10.2.0.3
Critical patch update fails with errors(urgent)
UD00_102030>pwd
/mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981
UD00_102030> opatch apply
Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.3.0
Oracle interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.3.0
Copyright (c) 2005, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved..
Oracle Home : /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0
Central Inventory : /u01/app/oracle/oraInventory
from : /var/opt/oracle/oraInst.loc
OPatch version : 10.2.0.3.0
OUI version : 10.2.0.3.0
OUI location : /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/oui
Log file location : /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2007-10-19_19-53-31PM.log
Failed to load the patch object. Possible causes are:
The specified path is not an interim Patch shiphome
Meta-data files are missing from the patch area
Patch location = /mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981
Details = PatchObject constructor: Input file "/mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981/etc/config/actions" or "/mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981/etc/config/inventory" does not exist.
ApplySession failed: PatchObject constructor: Input file "/mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981/etc/config/actions" or "/mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981/etc/config/inventory" does not exist.
System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
OPatch failed with error code 73
This cpu oct 2007 patch for 10.2.0.3(for solaris)That's great :) ...
Does anybody know which is the difference between
opatch napply
and
opatch apply ?
thanks,
P. -
Firefox has worked flawlessly for yrs until 10 days ago. Firefox tries to upgrade / update automatically but can't and my attempts to update manually also fail. each time the failure is because :
" The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)"
What ever a patch is, I don't know.
This is happening on two of my computers. Both using XP with service pack 3.
Both use Comodo CIS...and have for over a year.Hello,
Try installing a new copy of Firefox:
* https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/
Or if you need a different localized version:
* https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/
Does Comodo CIS itself block the installation? After downloading the latest version, try putting the executable for Firefox on a safe list if you can. -
Update to FF5.0 fails. patch apply fails.
The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)
This response shows up on software update window.
I am still stuck on FF4. Not getting the 5.0 version installed for some reason.Hi Steve,
Not a solution I'm afraid, but I also get an error message, 'cept mine states I'm not connected to the internet even though I am. I'd also like a solution!
Pete -
When updating Mozilla, I get this message:
"The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)".
What should be done?With that one, I'd try updating using a .dmg installer downloaded from the Apple Website:
http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/ -
The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)
The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)
Stuck on FF4.0. Update to 5.0 fails to install.Ok I'll try that when I have time. TYVM I think your right, it should work.
Just haven't been to worried about it as 4.0 is doing ok with me. But I may as well get the newer version huh? -
Update failed. The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed). It appears to want to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 8. But when I click the link, it does not offer updates, just an entire strip/reinstall! Where is the updates page? Help?
Thank you. I don't want to reload the entire thing - yes, it can be entirely reloaded, but I don't want to lose settings. How do I upload the PATCH as offered?
Maybe you are looking for
-
SAP Strategy Management - Under BO or BI
Hi, In one place (help.sap.com), I see Strategy Management included under SEM (so I assume it is under BI) where as in another place (sap.com), it is included under Business Objects. Can someone please guide? Or, are those two different applications
-
How to allow normal/regular users to view a report
I have been compiling reports in MS SQL 2012 Reporting Services. the URLs is http://test_report:80/reports. I have no problem with viewing the reports because I am an admin but normal users are getting access denied. this is how I assign permission
-
Where did the installed program files go?
I installed some programs on memory card of my N95 and would like to delete the program completely. I use undelete function to remove the program and reinstall the program again. All the previous settings resume. Can someone advise where the program
-
Excluding/hiding fields in PDF email attachment
Hi all, We have created an online interactive form that has several elements, a dropdownbox, a subform and input textfields, that are hidden for the user in "Preview"/"Display"-mode. We are using the following code to hide the elements (using FormCal
-
Hi, I am working on SRM(proxy) to File scenario. HTTP port is not set up for the application servers on SRM system. As a result, i am not able to connect to ESR. This is confirmed by SPROX_CHECK_HTTP_COMMUNICATION. Is there any way i can make it work