R9 280X Max HDMI Resolution?

I have ordered an MSI R9 280X GAMING 3G card to run a 4K TV as a monitor at 3840x2160. I thought all of the R9 280X cards were able to output this 4K 3840x2160 resolution on the HDMI port. But, based on the specifications list on MSI's website for this card the max resolution is 2560x1600. Which is correct?
us.msi.com/product/vga/R9_280X_GAMING_3G.html#specification

Hi Paul_,
Welcome to Lenovo Community Forums!
The system Z50-70 59-432484 Runs with a processor Intel® Core™ i5-4210U which Based on Intel houses a GPU Intel® HD Graphics 4400
The Intel HD Graphics supports up to
Max Resolution (HDMI 1.4)
3280x2000@60Hz
Hope this helps
Cheers!

Similar Messages

Satellite A660-1FM - Max. screen resolution of external monitor

Hi All,
This may be (probably) an easy questions to answer but I have a Satellite A660-1FM and want to use it with my Samsung Syncmaster (forgotten model) external screen. I grabbed an HDMI->DVI-D adapter, and all is well, but here is my question:
The toshiba specs page for my laptop (http://uk.computers.toshiba-europe.com/innovation/product/Satellite-A660-1FM/1096013/toshibaShop/false/) shows an external resolution capability of:
Max Resolution : 2,048 x 1,536
Max Refresh Rate : 100 Hz
Non-interlaced resolution with max refresh rate : 1,920 x 1,200
But I get what I call standard HDMI resolution (not surprising I guess) when connected HDMI->DVI-D to my external monitor. I have previously run this monitor on my desktop at much high resolutions than 1080P, so the monitor is capable.
Just wondered what I'm missing here, or is it a case of the graphics card spec is higher than is possible to output from the laptop ?
Thanks for any help
Andy

Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
As to native resolution of the external monitor - unsure how to find this - but it was running a with a lot higher res when it was connected to my old desktop (which has died and been replaced by this laptop)
R/E the adapter - My Samsung Syncmaster monitor has a DVI-D cable sticking out the back of it, so I needed to connect that to my laptop - either vga-> DVI-D or HDMI-DVI-D to make use of it.
The external monitor is currently running at 1680 x 1050 using the laptop HDMI output -> HDMI-DVI-D adapater -> external monitor.
Before my desktop died, using the same external monitor I was running at 1680 x (guessing a bit here) 2048 ish (really sure I had a greater y res, this 1050 lark is really squishy).. in any case, the Y resolution was much much much better than 1050.
But, according to the specification for this laptop, it can output 2048 x 1536 to an external device (How, the HDMI and VGA outptu cannot go that high right ?)
So, I'm trying to figure out how to get the resolution on the laptop spec onto my external monitior, which has more than handled this resolution before my old gaming desktop died.
Thanks again for the reply - I hope this makes my question clearer.
Cheers
Andy

Re: HDMI Resolution Chopping Border on my TV.

Hello,
Just bought a new Mac Mini. I hooked it up to the mini-dvi to dvi cable. I then connected that dvi-to-hdmi and hooked it up to my 42" LG TV. I started configuring it for HDMI resolution. It chops the border of the screen off.
I called Apple and they told me it would only work in 1024x768 resolution. It does work fine like that. But I have an HDMI TV that works fine with my AppleTV. I can't believe that the MacMini would have difficulty.
Are there any ways of fixing this to use 720p? Is there a 3rd Party app or something I can use or just hand-jam some settings somewhere? Thanks.
TJ

There are lots of posts in this section that will help you. It would be best if you read them yourself. A couple of suggestions, however:
Do a search on "overscan", that will help you see the entire finder and menus.
Do a search on "SwitchResX", which may be your last resort if there's nothing you can do in your TV menu system.

HP Mini Ability To View Win 8 Metro Under Its MAX Screen Resolution When Released :(

This is just a question and I know it has got to be posted many, many time somewhere. I absolutely love the Mini and when I had some issues after my purchase a few months ago, the fantastic support agent even said when the actual Win 8 is released, it will be so cool on it. Well, one major problem I never caught. While the Mini Desktop portion of Win 8 Consumer preview works great, the HP Mini ability to view Win 8 Metro under Its MAX screen resolution is not possible. Now I know HP does not support the consumer preview as of yet but am I just out of luck by the release date? Will there be some kind of patch or ability for current Mini buyers to use Win 8 Metro when released? I asked this question in a Win 8 forum and the response I got was just that Notebooks are not designed for these kinds of features and are simple in nature. I agree but that is backward having a small device that will not be able to use Windows 8 except on its Desktop and furthermore, something tells me that Minis after 2013 will? Help....

Anyway, I know there is nothing that can be done about it-its just frustrating knowing that in about 7 months, the upgrade will not mean much to these minis and pretty much a new unit within 12 months of an OS release. I doubt MS will lower the resolution rate but the 600 is right at that line for many programs as well. I never would have thought-I am just stuck and was hoping the 210 would be compatible to an OS that is supposed to be friendly with the smaller devices-now this is ironic.

Does rendering previews larger than max native resolution benifit you.

Hi, I have Adobe Lightroom 4.3. I like to know if rendering standard previews, larger than the max native resolution of my LCD display (1680x1050), will Help me, if I look edit photos at great than 1:1 ratio. IE, 2880, 2040, 1680 etc.. In some cases. I work on files with a brush, up to 8:1 magnification. Does that extra resolution translate to greater detail when working that close?

help1111111111111111,
You may want to re-think your workflow.
Image sequencing in Develop module is sloooooooowww... - no way around it (other than using EditInLightroom plugin, which reduces resolution, temporarily, in favor of develop module speed, but even then it's slow compared to Library module). note: last 4 images developed are cached in ram, those are fast to get at, but the rest: slooooooooowww...
Image sequencing in Library module is faaaaaaaaaast - if you have up-to-date previews, otherwise it's slooooooowww too.
So the trick is to make sure library previews are up-to-date, then sequence images in the library module - when you hit the image(s) you want to edit, press 'd', or another develop module keyboard shortcut... - then, upon edit completion, return to library module, via 'e' or 'g', or some other preferred method, for more sequencing.
Bottom-line: switching between library & develop module ad-infinitum is a fact of Lightroom life, if you are one of those who can't "do everything there is to do in one module before switching to the other" (I'm one too), and you want to use Lightroom most efficiently.
Maybe one day, Adobe will integrate the lib & dev modules and/or enhance Lightroom to better cache image viewing data, until then... - good luck.
Rob

VirtualBox Max Screen Resolution

I've installed Windows 10 Technical Preview in VirtualBox on my Mac and everything went very smooth and fast! But I have a few problems if anyone can please help me.
1. Guest Additions won't install. "Isn't compatible with this version of Windows" I tried to install via CMD also, but VirtualBox does not see it installed (if it did)
2. Because of the first problem, the VM's max screen resolution is 1600x1200, while my Mac's Thunderbolt Display is 2560x1440
I've installed Windows 8.1 Preview before and it worked, so I think it's a problem with Windows.

Both of you must work with VirtualBox to resolve this peculiarity. VirtualBox is not a Microsoft product and is not supported by Microsoft.
Oracle has sole responsibility for support of their products and the VirtulaBox website is found @
https://www.virtualbox.org/
The appropriate forum for discussing this situation is in the VirtualBox forums found @
https://forums.virtualbox.org/
The VirtualBox Guest Additions are also the sole responsibility of Oracle, not Microsoft!
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. ”

Max screen resolution different under lion?

okay, is it just me, or does a 4 year old 20" imac have a smaller max resolution under lion than it did before? it's kind of hard to tell if everything is bigger now, but without doubt all the icons on my desktop are a LOT bigger than they were before the upgrade. of course, i went into system prefs - displays and the resolution is set at 1680 x 1050, which is the max choice. i just can't remember what it was set at before.

Screen resolutions are determined by your graphics hardware, not Lion per se. However, the display settings were changed on my Mac mini for the HDMI port after the Lion upgrade, and it keeps resizing all of my windows for minimum resolution on startup, so I'd venture to say that Lion has a few bugs regarding screen resolution that are in need of bug-fix updates.

Max 3200x1800 resolution on 4k monitor??

I got my Asus PB287Q 4k monitor yesterday and started using it with my Mac Pro (Late 2013). A few issues arise:
If used alone, I get a max resolution of 3200x1800 @ 30Hz.
If I switch to DP1.2 in the monitor preferences, I get max 3840x2160 @ 60Hz, but then I get artefacts on the right hand side of the screen (apparently this is an Apple problem and is going to be resolved in 10.10), but effectively is useless
The only way to get max resolution of 3840x2160 @ 30Hz is to plug in an additional Full HD monitor via HDMI (I am not joking!)
There is no startup screen on the Asus (not really bothered by this)
What I would like to do is use the screen at max resolution simply on its own. 30Hz is absolutely fine for what I am currently doing.
I appreciate your help.
LL

Good thought. I tested it with the three different buses, same result.
Funny enough, just looked at my 'About This Mac':
It shows the Aus as having 6400x3600 resolution, which is not correct.
Here is the screenshot of my Display Prefs:
Both displays are driven from a D700 in slot 2:
Also, when the screen comes back online (after sleeping, etc.) I might have the 3200x1800 resolution back up. I am using a DP 1.2 cable sourced from Amazon.com.

[13" Mid 2012 not-retina] What is the max output resolution of my macbook?

Hi,
I'm in the market for a new external display. Maybe 21:9, maybe 4K, not sure yet.
I believe I have 3 options with the Thunderbolt(not mini-display)port on my Mac.
Using my mini-displayport to VGA adapter
Using my mini-displayport to HDMI adapter
Using just a thunderbolt cable
What would be the best to use? I believe that there are Thunderbolt displays on the market (AOC has a 21:9 one I believe).
What is the maximum resolution for an external display for my MacBook Pro? Does my mac support 4K? Does it support 21:9?
Thanks for your reply.
Specifications of my MacBook:
MacBookPro9,2
OSX 10.9 Yosemite
13" mid 2012 not retina
250GB SSD
16GB RAM
Intel HD Graphics 4000 1024 MB

The maximum resolution your MBP will support is 2560 x 1600. Thunderbolt connection would be the best. Your MBP does NOT support 4k displays.
http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT6008
Ciao.

Macbook Pro 15" Retina Windows 7 HDMI Resolution issue

Hello,
I have a late 2013 Macbook Pro 15" with Retina display running bootcamp with Windows 7.
I have connected the Macbook to an external HP w2448hc display using HDMI interface.
When booting to OS X 10.9.4, the resolution of the external display is set to 1920x1200 and it looks fine. See picture below:
However, when booting to Windows 7 the resolution on the external display looks lower (although shows up as 1920x1200):
I have another PC which I have connected to the same display with HDMI and the resolution also shows up as 1920x1200. However, in this case the resolution indeed looks as the correct one:
Although not seen very well from the screen shots, both the PC and the Macbook Pro (with Windows 7) show the same resolution in the settings, but the desktop and icons under Macbook Pro (bootcamp) look bigger and with smaller resolution.
Does anyone know how to solve this?

Hi,
I managed to fix this resolution issue by lowering the color depth to 16bit for the external display. Not exactly sure why was this necessary, maybe for some reason Windows cannot allocate enough video memory for both displays?

Thunderbolt to HDMI resolution on Samsung monitor

I recently got a Kanex iAdapt Thunderbolt to HDMI adapter and an Amazon HDMI cable to hook up my MBP to a Samsung notebook.
I am getting a picture on my monitor (I saw on the boards that the most commom problem was not getting any picture at all), it's just not setup right. The resolution looks weird and it's really hard on the eyes.
I've tried all resolutions System Preferences give me (1080p, 1080i, 1600x900, 1344x1008, etc) and it's still not looking right.
Does anybody know what might help this issue?
Ps.: The monitor I'm using is the Samsung SyncMaster P2270HN
Thanks!

Nandasaboia,
I'm having a similar problem with a client's mid 2011 17" MBP i7 with thunderbolt connection and a Samsung P2770FH.
I'm using a mini-display-to-HDMI cable to go from the thunderbolt port on the 2011 17" MBP to the HDMI input on the back of the monitor. The monitor works fine in 720p, but in 1080i it is blurry and in 1080p the bottom 2/3 of the screen flickers and goes all snowy every few seconds.
The weird thing is my 2009 15" MBP Intel Core 2 Duo with a Mini-Display port works just fine in 1080p. Everything is clear and crispy just that way you would expect. So it isn't the monitor, and it isn't the cable. It sounds like it is at best a driver issue with sending a Display-port signal via a Thunderbolt port, but at worst it could be that there needs to be a new controller for the Thunderbolt port hardware.
Here's a post about it in more detail. It talks about the Apple Thunderbolt Display not the MBP, but I think the reason for the trouble could be the same. I don't know, I have to do more research on the topic.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4832/the-apple-thunderbolt-display-review/8
-Foster

[Solved] A75A-G35 gives no video signal over HDMI, resolution over DVI limited

Hello community,
following problem: I have been using my A75A-G35 board with an A4-3400 Llano APU, the APU has been connected to a 19" BenQ FP91GP monitor via a DVI cable. I got its maximum resolution of 1280x1024 with no issues.
Now I have purchased a 24" Dell U2415 monitor with a maximum resolution of 1920x1200 and wanted to connect it to my computer. However, I got stuck:
1. I get no signal whatsoever using the HDMI output and a HDMI>HDMI cable. I have tested a different computer and connected it to the Dell with the same cable successfully, so the cable and the monitor should be fine.
edit: Disregard the following as the problem with the DVI cable appears also with the other computer. The problem is therefore just the fact that the HDMI output of the board doesn't work!
2. I get a signal with a DVI>DVI cable + DVI>HDMI adapter. I can access the BIOS, the boot manager and see the boot screen, however once the desktop should be displayed the screens turns black and the monitor keeps switching to standby and back on again, the screen staying black all the time, however. But before installing the driver package (for chipset and video, downloaded from the MSI website), I could see the desktop with a resolution of 800x600. Also, if I boot into safe mode, I can see the desktop and increase the resolution up to 1280x1024. Higher resolutions up to 1600x1200 are available, however selecting any of them results in severe screen flickering.
3. If I boot my Linux install, I have almost the same behaviour. I see the boot messages but then the screen turns black when the desktop should appear. However, if I connect the old BenQ monitor to the VGA port, I get a signal on both screens, however both screens have the resolution 1280x1024 and I cannot increase the resolution of the Dell, because if I try to, the screen turns black again. Lower resolutions than 1280x1024 are possible, though. Note that the "second monitor trick" does only work with Linux, with Windows I get only a black screen on both monitors.
As a side note, the DVI cable I'm using is a DVI-D single link, so the maximum resolution it supports is actually exactly the resolution of the Dell, 1920x1200.
Thanks for any hint,
Photon

your welcome!
when you said your problem and the symptoms I thought that board sounded familiar as alot of people when it first came out that we had to explain that to them so I had a look and yes it had the jumpers to switch ports for its digital display display signal to be routed to another port so i thought that was the cause!
have fun with your board now you have it in HDMI mode!

Macbookpro dvi-hdmi resolution

Hello
I have a dvi to hdmi connection and I connect it to my tv, now the picture only takes a small bit of my actual laptop screen. the tv is 1920x1020, so i set it to that on the laptop and the macbook as its usual size but as I said the tv only picks up a small area of my macbook screen.
can anyone help?
also, how can i set the screen not to sleep or dim when i am running a program that i dont necessarily have to touch to operate.
gracias

The MacBook Pro is connected to a Sony Bravia KDL-40S2000's "PC IN" port.
Here are more details:
If I use a DVI-to-HDMI connection, OS X identifies the display as "KDL-40S2000" and I get the following resolutions:
1920 x 1080 (1080i but with black side borders)
1280 x 720 (720p, perfect fit)
However with an HDMI connection, the picture quality is overly sharp. I can see jaggies and occasional artifacts in movies. Some letters on the desktop are not that readable. This leads me to believe that this TV is not ready for a DVI-to-HDMI connection. (HDMI to HDMI connection from my Samsung DVD player is fantastic though.)
Now, if I use a DVI-to-RGB connection (thanks to the adapter included with the MBP plus an old monitor's cable), OS X identifies the display as "Sony TV" and I get the following resolution:
1360x768
It's a perfect fit. The picture quality is perfect. Screen fonts and other graphical elements have perfect edges and very readable. In other words, my TV has become this huge LCD monitor.
So at least for this Sony-Apple pair, analog quality is much, much better and is the recommended connection.

DVI, HDMI resolutions supported in MBP

What should I look for when buying new LCD monitor/tv to connect to MBP? Uncertain about resolutions supported. I have ATI Mobility Radeon X1600. I am looking at Samsung with 1080p, 1920x1200. Will this work and do I use DVI or HDMI connections?

Where possible I'd go with an HDMI connection, as long as your Samsung does true 1080p resolution 1920x1200 will be fine (and is supported). ((Some things advertised as HD aren't truly 1080))

Satellite L850/0C9 and HDMI resolutions

Hi all.
Ive recently purchased a L850/0C9 and I can't get the HDMI to output at 1360x768 which is my panels native resolution.
Using a vga cable I can output to 1360x768 just not with HDMI
Any ideas?
Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit

> In first sentence you can get right resolution using HDMI but in second this is not possible. Im confused.
He is able to get the resolution using VGA cable but not HDMI ;)
*@Devok*
My notebook supports HDMI and DVI output.
I was not able to get the resolution using HDMI but DVI output
From my understanding not all resolution might be supported by graphic card or graphic chip so this might be one of the reasons
If display driver cause this, then an update should be performed.

R9 280X Max HDMI Resolution?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for