RA and Settlement

Dear All,
I am using Cost based POC method for revenue recognization. Also i am assigned the P&L and Balance sheet G/L in OKG8 without creating the CE.Then i have calculated the RA and Saved. after that i am executed the settlement through CJ88.
After that i have cheked the CJI3 report but system is not showing the revenue recognized through RA in CJI3 or any other Project related reports.
So please tell me is there any way to get reflected in Projects reports.
Thanks & Regards,
Rao.

Hello Rao
In the revenue reports, you can see only planned and actual revenues.
- Planned revenues form SD-documents like described in OSS note 96404,
from billing plans on WBS elements, from cost element oriented revenue
planning or from structure planning of revenues on WBS element.
- Actual revenues from invoices and credit memos.
When result analysis is run on the Project (KKA2 ) the report S_ALR_87013572 will
show Revenue, Revenue surplus and Revenues excess in billing.
Hope this helps
Ger

Similar Messages

Intercompany Netting and Settlement process

Hi Guys,
I am new to the intercompany transactions. Please anyone of you can explain or guide me to some documentation on what intercompany netting and settlement process means and how to do it...that would be great.
Thanks and Regards,
MS

Hello,
If you can let us know the business scenario and context in which you are asking, it would be better for us to explain in more detail.
However, you can go through the following just for your clarification.
You can post the cross company code postings even between two controlling areas. The system does not prevent to post documents between two company codes in two controlling area. Need not necessarily they should be under one operating concern. Provided you have to make sure that you have followed the following points:
In OBY6 - To company codes must be assigned to same Company, meaning that you mus thave created a Company and that company must have been assigned to these two company codes.
OBYA - You should maintain the clearing accounts in both the company codes. Meaning that you are posting one leg in one company code and the other leg in the other company. Therefore, it is required to have the missing legs in each company code.
Company Code1 - Posting Key 40 - Clearing Account
Company Code1 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
Company Code2 - Positng Key 40 - Clearing Account
Company Code2 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
OB08 - In case if the two company codes have different local (company code) currencies, you may maintain the exchange rates.
You can now go to F-02 and post a cross company code transaction giving the first leg in first company code and the second leg in second company code. Missing leg in the first company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA and the missing leg in the second company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA. That means you will have four line items overall.
The system will post three document.
Document 1 in First Company Code
Document 2 in Second Company Code
and
Document3 - Cross Company Code Document.
The cross company code document consists of the first company code document number plus company code plus last two digits of the fiscal year.
Hope this must have clarified your doubts.
Please let me know in case if you need further details.
Thanks,
Ravi

Costs and settled costs layout in standard reports

Hello guys !
what needs to be done in order to have a report, for example, S_ALR_87013543 , splitted by costs and settled costs (debit/credit) ? I can't find a layout or smth.
Thanks guys.
Laimonas

Hi
Include this ZPP2 in a separate report group (GR51)... After that,
1. Create the transaction code,say, ZF01_TCODE from Se93
2. Choose "Transaction with parameters".. Press enter
3. Enter START_REPORT in the Transaction field and press Enter
4. Select the Skip initial screen and Inherit GUI attributes check boxes
5. On the same screen, scroll down to the Default Values table and select parameters D_SREPOVARI-REPORTTYPE and
D_SREPOVARI-REPORT.
6. Enter RW for the report type and your report group ZCC8 as the report value
7. Now you can save your transaction and transport it to other systems
Regards
Ajay M

List of orders for which varience calculated and settled

Dear Friends,
How to list out the production orders for which variance calculated and settled by each period wise,Please give me a solution.

Hi,
U can find some status of order in COOIS T code or in Order it self.
Go to COOIS
Select the option in status field.
SETT - Order Settled,
SETC - Settlement Rule Created
SETM - Settlement rule created manually.
TECO - Techo (Once order is Completed).
without techo order is not settled.
Regards,
Pavan PP

Consignment and settlement

Hi Friends,
My user is running MRKO t.code and settling the documents and he is getting message like "Consignment settlement : No message was found for partner 266666/Company code".
I have maintained KONS condition for the vendor and in the combination (com.code + vendor) table i have maintained printer also. But this is happening for one user for other user it is working. I checked up both the roles no difference.
Please advise
Thanks in advance
Balu

Hi Anil,
How you are getting ZERO and Negative Vale for consignment?
Consignment settlement will happens after withdrawal of goods or after Sales based on your Consignment Purchase Info record.
Bye,
Muralidhara

Internal order posted and settled to auc in incorrect ccode and fiscal year

Hi,
We created an internal order in ian ncorrect company code and settled the cost to AUC in previous fiscal year.
I would like to know what options do you recommend to move the AUC cost from incorrect company code to internal order in a correct company in the current fiscal year. Our AUC account is set up as control account and cannot be manually posted to.
I understand Internal order settlement to AUC for previous fiscal period cannot be reversed in the current year?.
Kindly advise
Umang

Hi
Select the Internal order > Reverse the settlement in the same year...(KO88)
Try to transfer the balance from this IO to new IO in the other co code from (F-02)..
You need to have Inter Co clearing accounts in the IMG....
now settle the new IO to new asset (AUC) in the other company
Br, Ajay M

Overhead and settlement in WIP

Hello,
We have a material and COGM for that is: 2000 and COGS is 2400. But we are updating the COGM only to Material master as standard price.
When we run the WIP and Settlement system is showing 400 as difference and it is going to Price Difference.
To avoid what we have to do.
1) Shall we need to maintain overheads in OKTZ as a inventory?
Thanks
Sateesh

Hi,
There is no relation between COGM and COGS.
What system is doing is correct.
Difference of 400 rs is coming due to difference between actual issue of Raw material and confirmation of Finish Goods.
Check the production order in CO03 and go to cost analysis. there you will get the reason of difference.
Regards.
Shayam

Participation group AND settlement unit in real estate module

Hello,
i want to create Participation group (transaction RESCPG) and Settlement unit (transaction RESCSU).
Is there any bapi or standard lsmw object to create the 2 objects ?
thanks for your help.

self solved using :
BAPI_RE_PG_CREATE to create participation group.
and
BAPI_RE_SU_CREATE to create settlement units.

AUC distribution and settlement

Hello gurus
can anybody give me the answer
When we are during AUC what is happening in distribution and settlement
when settle the assets what is the with line item and without line item
Regards
Sri

Hi
Distribution means, the AUC amount is distributed as a Percentage or Equivalent amount or Quantity of the AUC amount. For Ex: If AUC is 1000000, then the AUC amount of 10lakhs can be either settled by percentage or by quantity (for example, Rs.10 lakhs for 5 numbers of assets, 5 is the quantity here) or equivalent amount which might be full 10 lakhs or 350000 for one asset and 500000 on another asset and the balance on some other asset to be distributed.
in case of settlement, the AUC Asset is credited and Main Asset is debited when we settle the AUC asset through AIBU or
CO88.
Now coming to Line Item and with out LIne Item. in case of AUC Line item settlement is possible. The number of line itmes posted to the same AUC Asset, can be settled to various main assets. For ex : The above 10 lakhs is actually entered thorugh 20 line items of Rs. 50000 each. Now, these 20 line items can be settled to ONE main Asset or 6 line items can be settled to one main asset and the balance 14 line items can be settled to another Main asset. This is Line Item settlement.
In case of No Line item settlement, usually AUC assets values are to be settled to Main Assets. In case of Main Assets, further settlement is not required. For ex : AUC Asset value is 10 lakhs, Now this 10 lakhs should be settled to Main Asset Buiding. So Line item settlement is possible only for AUC assets. Main Asset Building need not be settled to another asset. So when we create the Building Asset Class, we select NO line item settlement possible.
hope you got the answer.
if so, you know what to do to satisfy me.
Thanks
Rishikesh

Variance Calculation and Settlement

Hello Gurus,
While performing period end closing, the variance calculated (KKS6) amount is not the same as the amount in settlement (KK87). Both are picking up the same variance categories for the material but with different values. can you please let me know the reason for this.
Note: This error occurs only for one company code, other company codes calculate and settle the same amount. WIP and scrap is not being used by the company codes.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Friend,
did you check whehter all your allocation and distribution cycles related to that company code are executed.
in my opinion you need to check if that is executed and again compare the both reports
Best Regards,

Production order WIP and Settlement

Hi All,
We have some production order WIP calculation and settlement issue or May be Iu2019m not understating WIP calculation and settlement process.
I will explain my issue with an example.
We have one production order with qty 100 and Material consumption and labor is posted as follow.
Material USD100
Labor USD50
Before period close, we have received qty20 into inventory (GR) and USD300 posted to Inventory.
At period end when I run WIP calculation (KKAX), system is showing in "USD150-" into u201CType of WIP data Reserve for Unrealized costsu201D and this is not settling to FI and PCA.
Is this correct? Or am I missing any configuration? Please explain me.
Any help is appreciated.....
Thanks,
Anusha

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
In OKGA-->update of WIP Calculation and Result Analysis transaction,we have assigned secondary cost elements(931XXXXX) to Controlling area, Version,RA key and Line Id to "K" and here we have WIP and Reserves.
In OKG8-->Define Posting Rules for Settling Work in Process,we have assigned only WIP secondary cost element from OKGA to P&L and Balance sheet accounts to "WIPR" RA category.
Do i need to assign "RESERVE" secondary cost element from OKGA to "WIPR" RA category in OKG8?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Anusha.

Aproval Process for Shipping cost document and settlement

Hi
Is there any approval process for capturing shipping cost and settlement (Using t codes VL31N,vt01n &VI01)?
MVRao

Hi
This has been closed and done through development.
Maganti rao

AUC and settlement rule mismatch.

Hi,
We have created many AUCs while uploading initial data at the time of go-live by posting JVs on WBSE and then performing the settlement. Now due to some currency issues we have reversed all settlements, and then Asset accounting person has resetted the asset register.
now when I am trying to create AUC from CJ20N, system creates AUC and provides the number. but this newly generated AUC number is not matching with the AUC in settlement rule. I can't delete the old settlement rule as the settlement performed on that. as well as I am not able to add new AUC in settlement rule.
Please let me know if there is any program / tcode which can remove this inconsistency. or is there any other procedure to make it streamline.
Please help.
Regards,
Nilesh.

Hi,
There is no error message in this case.
The scenario is like:
I have one WBSE and AUC is created for this WBS. for example AUC number is 1. the WBSE is released and some cost has incurred on it. during periodic settlement the cost is settled on the AUC.
Now the Client FICO team observed that the asset accounting is wrong due to currency conversion problem, so FICO team decided to reset the asset register and upload the entire master with new corrections. this will reset the AUCs as well.
so i reversed the settlement done on AUC and got the cost back on WBSE.
FICO team has resetted the asset register and all AUCs got deleted.
Now the issue is: WBSE is having AUC #1 in settlement rule which can not be deleted as settlement is carried out on this rule.
But when I create new AUC for WBS it is being created as some different number, (lets say #7) so even if now I run settlement the settlement will be done on AUC #1 insted of #7 even though #1 belongs to some other WBSE now in new scenario.
I hope I have clearly mentioned the issue.
Regards,
Nilesh

Project Systems - Report on WBS and Settlement recievers

Need help in searching for any PS report wherein I can get list of WBS elements along with the settlement receivers defined in the settlement rule.
Or else how can we get such a report.

Hi
Check the Table <b>COBRB</b> you can achieve this results
in which the WBS element is there(PS_PSP_PNR) for the settlement rules
If needed refer other PS tables like
PROJ,PRPS
and for costs BPEJ table
Regards
Anji

Commitment Line Item report - BE and Settlement Unit issue

Dear experts,
Request your kind help.
This is with respect to viewing the commitment line item report in ECC 6 for RE-FX master data objects. There are two scenarios.
Scenario 1
Purchase requisition (PR) is created with a business entity (BE) as an Account Assignment object. After the PR is released the same is used to create a Purchase Order (PO). After the PO has been successfully created, I am running the Commitment Line Item report (REISCOLIBD) giving the BE number as a search parameter. The report shows perfectly the PO and the amount of commitment.
Scenario 2
Purchase requisition (PR) is created with a BE as a Account Assignment object. Further to that under the Settlement section, inside the RE Obj box I am also specifying the Service Charge Key, the Settlement Unit and the Ref Date. After the PR is released the same is used to create a Purchase Order (PO). After the PO has been successfully created, I am running the Commitment Line Item report (REISCOLIBD), again by mentioning only the BE number as the input parameter. This time the report does not show the PO at all under commitment line items and instead gives the message "no line items were selected". But here is the catch. When I am running the transaction KSB2 and I am clickng on 'further selection criteria' and then 'Ref Doc num' and then typing the PO number and then running the report, it shows the result perfectly.
Can someone please tell me why in the second scenario, the transaction REISCOLIBD is failing to capture the data related to commitment line items?
Please refer to Note 1271310 to see how to adapt the transaction REISCOLIBD to suit the needs for Commitment Line Item report.
Regards,
Suvarghya Dutta

Hello all,
I have been able to find the answer. As of now Commitment Line Item report for any master data for service charge settlement does not exist and and as such wont be available.
Kind regards,
Suvarghya Dutta

Foreign currency posting to Internal order and settlement

Hi All,
The payment posted to an internal order was in a foreign currency then translated into usd. The settlement used a different exchange rate so in usd there was a balance.
How do we rectify this..?
Regards
Ashok PRabhu

Hi
I am not sure how IS-H works.. But for sure, it should allow you to enter 3 stat objects...
There would be some ABAP trick pertaining to IS-H which I am not aware of...
I can guide you a bit... During SD billing, ask abaper to put a break point and manually enter the values for cost center and IO and then post the doc.... One of these 2 will be the outcomes
a. Either it will get posted or
b. It will get over written before posting....
based on the outcome, you will have to decide your next course of action
Also, if your cost center to IO is one to one mapping (Chances would be rare), you can simply write a substitution which would always prevail
I am sorry I could not offer you a complete solution.. But, this is what comes to my mind...
Regards
Ajay M

RA and Settlement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for