Radeon 9650 image not fully scaled

Hooked up sexy 30inch display to my G5 (2.5-ppc) and oops, need to upgrade graphics card to get the uber-size resolution. Finding a PCI-X card is a hassle, but found a Radeon 9650 that claims to be for the 30" display (even has a sticker on it claiming so). Installed, and still had only the 19xx X 12xx or so, and the 2650 x xxxx not an option on the display control panel. System profiler show the card as a 9600. Ran the Radeon downloads, trashed preferences, tried both DVI connections, followed all the threads in this forum, etc., but no good. Put the old card back in, and now applications like Final Cut throw an error on launch regarding "open gl not supported by this card, etc" (this set-up ran flawlessly before the card switch)
I would be happy now if I could just go back to the old monitor/card, but the open gl stuff is killing everything.

Reset the PRAM. No love.
Reset the PMU. No love.
I bought this graphics card for running a 30" monitor, but it wont. I don't know what to do.

Similar Messages

LR 4 Library: Images not fully loading (unsharp)

I'm editing some images ready to send to a client and I find that some them do not become fully sharp, when viewed in the library module, in loup view. Of the 14 images showing in one folder (selected with "pick") only the first 2 are sharp when viewed, the other 12 are not becoming sharp and clear.
They are actually quite sharped and sharpened - it's not an issue with the image itself.
Any thoughts are welcome.
Stephen

Hi Rikk
Yes they go back as sharp once viewed at 100% But it's also very slow to "load" the images at 100% LR seems to hae slowed down on me lately and was running quite fast previously. It also "hangs" on opening, sometimes longer than other times.
Thanks for the reply.
Stephen

Image in photoshop is not fully seen

image in photoshop is not fully seen, and is positioned towards the lower part of my screen making it impossible to work properly on the image and impossible to crop as i am not seeing the whole image. This only a recent problem that has developed

jujust to say its OS X version 10.8.5

Windows 8.1 Pro - Flash Pro: Menu's and window selection panes do not fully render, or are misaligned. Same with the stage

This bug makes the program virtually unusable for anyone using Windows 8.1. I have a dual screen setup : 1920 x 1200 and 1920 x 1080 on the other, AMD Radeon HD 5700 Series drivers (Latest versions), running on a Windows 8.1 Pro OS. When you attempt to view the various menu option panes, the windows themselves are not rendering fully, or you are hidden. Also the stage is shifted as well to the lower right, making the program almost unusable. I have tested this on a Mac, as well as on a windows 7 machine and this does not occur there. So it appears to be only within a Windows 8.1 Pro machine. I have attached screen shots of what I am seeing. Notice in the first image, we are looking at the new document pane. You cannot see the options fully and they are shifted to the right out of view. The next image shows both the stage, shifted right, as well as the Document Pane. The options are not fully visible, and clipped off. The window itself is not re-sizable. I have cleared the appdata, and re-installed the program. Same result. I attempted to troubleshoot this via chat, however your network kept losing connection. Please let me know if anyone is suffering from this, and any resolution. Thanks!

Thank you sir! The scaling was the issue, and the solution. By clicking on settings->Screen Resolution-> Text and Font link -> It was defaulted to 125%. For anyone else who has this issue, set it to 100% and it will resolve these issues.
Thanks again! Back to development

JPG images not displayed correctly in Bridge and Photoshop (Mac OS)

(Note: I have copied the content of this query from the Creative Suites forum where I originally opened it.)
I am using CS4 under OSX 10.4.11 on a PowerMac G5 Quad with 23" Apple cinema display. Images which have been captured as JPG are displayed fine by Preview, but when opened in Bridge, Camera Raw or Photoshop. the colours are all "washed out". The attached screen capture should give an idea of the difference, with the upper being Camera Raw (image settings) and the lower being Preview. My monitor has been calibrated and I'm using sRGB IEC61966-2.1 colour space in Camera Raw and Photoshop. The colours displayed by Preview are pretty close to "real life". I find it virtually impossible to adjust the colours in Photoshop to get back to anything similar.
After opening the image in Photoshop without adjustment, and Save As JPEG with embedded color profile, Preview displays the new image the same as Photoshop. Save As JPEG without embedded color profile, and Preview displays this copy just like the original. It seems that Photoshop is making different (incorrect) assumptions about what color space to use when there is no embedded color profile. Shouldn't it assume sRGB like virtually everything else (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRGB)? Or is its interpretation of sRGB incorrect? How can I fix this?
Re: JPG images not displayed correctly in Bridge and Photoshop

xxxxyyyyz wrote:
…If there is someone out there who has experience of obtaining decent colour management in CS4 on a Power PC, I would really like to know how you achieved it.
That would be yours truly, and I hasten to reply because I may have some insights that can help you too.
Just get it it out of the way, here's my setup:
Photoshop 11.0.2 ("CS4"); VersionCue disabled and uninstalled.—2.5 GHz Power Mac (PPC) G5-Quad; 16GB RAM; mutant, flashed 550MHz nVidia GeForce 7800GTX 1,700MHz 512MB VRAM; ATTO ExpressPCI UL5D LP SCSI card; Mac OS X Tiger 10.4.11 and Leopard 10.5.8 boot drives; Spotblight, Dashboard and Time Machine permanently disabled; dual 22" CRT monitors; USB wireless 'n' available but connected to the Internet via wired Ethernet; 1 FW flatbed scanner; 2 SCSI scanners (one tabloid-size transparency scanner and a film scanner); various internal & external HDs; FW Epson 2200 and Ethernet Samsung ML-2850ND printers; 2 X Back-UPS RS 1500 XS units.
I can unambiguously and in good faith represent to you that my color management, from capture to print, is as spot-on as anyone with any kind of setup can hope to achieve. Unequivocally and without qualifications.
Now, first things first: Forget about trying to synchronize color management across the point applications lumped together only by Adobe marketing fiat into a variety of meaningless "creative suites". Concentrate on Photoshop. Do not try to use Bridge to synchronize anything.
The "suites" are a totally artificial construct created by Adobe bean counters and marketing types. The point applications (i.e. the individual programs clumsily bundled together, e.g. Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, etc.) are developed independently by separate engineering teams that are not only not in the same building, but in different cities, different states of the American Union, and even in different countries. They have very little communication among them, if any, as evidenced by repeated posts in these forums by Photoshop engineering staff urging us, the end users, to let the other teams know in their own forums that a given problem exists and is actually affecting our work.
Enough said about the cause of the problem. The end result is that Color Management is at very, very different levels of progress and sophistication in each individual point application, with only Photoshop fully entitled to be considered state of the art.
Secondly, a disclaimer: I have been hanging on to my CRT monitors and take care of them as Jascha Heifetz used to take care of his Stradivarius. I don't know what I will do if I manage to outlive the usefulness and accuracy of my CRTs (unlikely at this point). I have despaired in futile efforts to bring the luminosity of any LCD monitor down to where I would feel comfortable calibrating and profiling it. I believe my monitors are the foundation of my color management efforts.
Especially if you have one of the extreme wide-gamut LCD or LED monitors, you'll face an uphill battle.
Be careful to avoid any version 4 icc profiles, whether canned or generated by your calibration software. Stick to version2 icc profiles. Ask the manufacturer of your calibration software/hardware if in doubt.
Here are some not-too-recent, but thoroughly representative screen shots of the calibration results I obtain with my monitors, which I calibrate and profile often and regularly (I validate the calibration at least several times per month).
In a nutshell, my color management practices and settings mirror those described by Bruce Fraser, Jeff Schewe, Andrew Rodney and Gary Ballard's site. I have learned from all of them.
My working color space is ProPhoto RGB. I choose to work with PSD and PSB files. As a long-time, rabid JPEG hater, I only rarely deal with JPEGs, using them sporadically to illustrate a point in this forum or elsewhere in the web. My main output consists of prints.
I only deal with tagged image files (files with an embedded color profile) and often recommend beating up with a baseball bat any moron that hands you an untagged file—figuratively of course, but I find the expression gets my point across unambiguously.
Following is a screen shot of some of my pertinent settings:
Note that I have never bought into the "suite" concept myself. I do have and routinely use Adobe Illustrator 10.x, InDesign 2.x and Acrobat Professional 8.x, but they are all older, independent versions of each point application, licensed at different times.
Be further advised, that the answer to many problems offered by Adobe engineers often is not to install VersionCue, or uninstall it, or at least disable it.
Also, as outlined at the beginning of this post, concentrate on Photoshop, not on synchronizing applications that can't really communicate with each other, despite the claims of Adobe marketing hacks to the contrary.
One big caveat, do not fall into this trap:
xxxxyyyyz wrote:
…I believe my problem has nothing to do with my monitor profile, for several reasons, but…
…It seems extremely unlikely to me that…
You either want to learn, or you don't. You either want to solve your problems, or you don't.
When you start arguing instead of studying, questioning advice instead of following it and detecting where you went wrong, you're on the right track to nowhere. That attitude will get you there fast. Remember you are the one with the problem, and only you can acquire the discipline to learn how to solve it.
Go ahead and ask me anything that is not clear, just don't argue with me please, and don't tell me why you think Fraser, Rodney, Ballard and I are wrong. You see, I am not experiencing any problem that needs fixing. I have an interest in helping you, but not in hearing about your speculations, theories or conclusions.
Good luck.
Wo Tai Lao Le
我太老了

Remote image not resizing

I have created a web service that pulls images (gif) from the
database and base64 it for sending across the wire. The flex
application then decodes and renders the image. The Image is not
being scaled correctly. If I embed the image into the application
everything works correctly. But if the image is decoded then sizing
goes out the window.
The image overflows the Image box and takes up the full size
of the image. Zoom, rotation, etc. do nothing to the image.
Any help is appreciated...
Example Code:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:Application xmlns:mx="
http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"
layout="absolute" creationComplete="onLoad(event);">
<mx:Script>
<![CDATA[
import mx.utils.Base64Decoder;
public function onLoad(event:Event):void {
// Decode image - Base64 gif image (500 x 776)
var base64:String = "R0lGOD..."; // Get base64 from web
service call
var decoder:Base64Decoder = new Base64Decoder();
decoder.decode(base64);
// Load image into container
var loader:Loader = new Loader();
loader.loadBytes(decoder.flush());
image2.addChild(loader);
]]>
</mx:Script>
<mx:HBox id="mainBox">

<mx:Image id="image2" width="100" height="100" />
</mx:HBox>
</mx:Application>

The simplest way to fill a liquid division is to make a small image tile and repeat it in background with CSS code:
Example:
body {
background: url (my-bg-img.jpg) repeat;
More on backgrounds:
http://alt-web.com/Backgrounds.shtml
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/
http://twitter.com/altweb
http://alt-web.blogspot.com

Certain existing and newly saved photos are not fully loading..

I'm not sure if this is a result of the update, or related to a recent application I may have downloaded that interfaces with the photo library and/or camera (face melter™ or camera bag™)..
it also may be a result of the 2.2 update..
Here are some screencaps showing the issue.
First one, this is a photo that I have hosted that I took with my DLSR, I saved it to my phone via the touch and hold saving process, early on in my phones existance as you can see from the 60 of 600something, and it appears nice and clear(aside from the slight compression from e-mailing myself a screencap)
http://randy.mainevwscene.com/images/screenshot1.jpg
now here is a screencap of me visiting the hosted photo on safari today.. it also appears nice and clear
http://randy.mainevwscene.com/images/screenshot2.jpg
I held my finger on the photo, and have now been prompted to save (still clear)
http://randy.mainevwscene.com/images/screenshot3.jpg
and now here is a screencap of the photo I just saved in my photo library. It is obviously blurry... now all photos will do this for a split second while they load, but its as if its not fully loading the file when I view it.
http://randy.mainevwscene.com/images/screenshot4.jpg
Has anybody else experienced this or is it just me?
Message was edited by: thelumpya2

after messing around for a while, I figured out the chriteria that causes the blurry photos... I have no idea why however..
it is without a doubt related to the photos resolution... any photo that is of the resolution 800x533 or vertically 533x800 is having this blurry effect..
I found a random photo on google image search with a resolution of 800x533 of a lambo.. I saved it to my phone, and here's a screencap of the photo saved to my phone.
http://randy.mainevwscene.com/images/screenshot5.jpg
I then saved that photo to my computer, opened up photoshop and changed the resolution from 800x533 to 798x532 (constraining porportions) and then hosted the photo on my website.. Then I visted the hosted photo's URL on my iphone with safari and saved this image (798x532).. Here is a screencap.. you can see the difference clearly..
http://randy.mainevwscene.com/images/screenshot6.jpg

ITunes Store does not fully appear on screen

The iTunes store does not fully "load" on screen. It takes 2-3 minutes for just a few images to appear and then it stops. Everything else about iTunes is functioning completley well as are all of my other internet connections/processes. This problem has existed for around one month and we have upgraded to iTunes 9. Please help !

Perhaps try the iTunes Store loads partially or returns "Error 306" or "Error 10054" section in the Specific Conditions and Alert Messages: (Mac OS X / Windows) section of the following document:
iTunes: Advanced iTunes Store troubleshooting

ATI Radeon 9650 question

I have an ATI Radeon 9650 taken out of my dual 2.7 G5, will this card work in my G4 Dual MDD 1.25? (not FW800)

Hi
To use an 8x AGP card in a G4 that supports Apple's ADC connector (like your MDD), you have to tape over a couple of pins on the card.
The following link contains more information:
http://strangedogs.proboards40.com/index.cgi?board=experiments&action=display&th read=1123896576&page=1
It won't boot up otherwise.

Core Image: Not Supported??? Quartz Extreme: Not Supported???

Hello! I'm new to this forum and I'm a Mac noob. I have a problem. For some reason my computer is saying Core Image and Quartz Extreme are not supported.
ATI Mobility Radeon 9700:
Chipset Model: ATY,RV360M11
Type: Display
Bus: AGP
VRAM (Total): 64 MB
Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
Device ID: 0x4e50
Revision ID: 0x0000
ROM Revision: 113-xxxxx-134
Displays:
Color LCD:
Display Type: LCD
Resolution: 1440 x 900
Depth: 32-bit Color
Built-In: Yes
Core Image: Not Supported
Main Display: Yes
Mirror: Off
Online: Yes
Quartz Extreme: Not Supported
Display:
Status: No display connected
Is there a way to fix this? Please tell there's a way. I wanna see all those nice transition effects when using VirtueDesktops or Desktop Manager
Thanks!

Hi Leek Mibles;
May I welcome you to the Apple Discussion Forums.
The reason your system is telling you it can do Core Image is because it doesn't have the hardware to support it. Since your system is a PowerBook, you are unable to upgade the graphic card because it is soldered in. So I am sorry to say that the only way for you to get Core Image is to upgrade your whole system.
Allan

WARNING: Any laptop that comes with an *automatic* switching Radeon 6770m does not support OpenGL.

WARNING: HP has falsely advertised their dv6 and dv7 line. Any laptop that comes with an *automatic* switching Radeon 6770m does not support OpenGL and various other software. OpenGL games, Adobe CS Suit, and Design programs such as CAD or MatLab are incompatible with this laptop!

According to this post the 6670m does fully support open GL 4.1
http://forum.notebookreview.com/hp-pavilion-notebooks/583203-dv6t-7-switchable-graphics-76.html#post...
And AMD says it does also
http://www.amd.com/us/products/notebook/graphics/amd-radeon-6000m/amd-radeon-6700m-6600m/Pages/amd-r...

LR4 opens as lr2 and images not found

LR4 opens as lr2 and images not found, can anyone help me please, I'm hopeless.
LR4 just uploaded as upgrade.

Thanks dj, what happens is when I click on the LR4 shortcut LR4 window starts to open, flashes momentarily as LR4 then buggers off before fully opening my old LR2.
I have removed the LR4 installed yesterday, and reinstalled, but same problem. Also the installation process now seems to never stop cycling. It goes through the full installion cycle, then starts/repeats again. I have followed the prompts and run through it 3 times before giving up.
Any more clues on what I have done wrong, or now need t do please.

G5 & Radeon 9650: no start of iMovie 8

Hello.
Although my G5 seems to meet the system requirements iMovie 8 refuses to start up. I own a Dual G5 2,7 GHz along with a Radeon 9650 (which supports Core Image and Quartz Extreme (Apple System Profiler) on my main display and two Radeon 7000 PCI for my other two displays.
I don´t understand why iMovie 8 (7.1.1) always pops up that nag screen saying my hardware is incompatible with iMovie 8. I just want to capture off my Sony DCR-HC19E
Any ideas or help?
Thanks in advance!

Is the front power light blinking? It should be giving you hints as why it is hanging (bad memory, etc). To quote from the manual:
If the status light still flashes, determine the number of flashes to identify the
problem:
2 flashes: no RAM installed
3 flashes: incompatible RAM installed
4 flashes: no good DIMM banks
5 or 6 flashes: contact an Apple Authorized Service Provider
Joe
dual 2G G5 Mac OS X (10.4.4) GeForce 6800 Ultra, 2GB DRAM, 30" display

ATI radeon X1900 vs ATI Radeon 9650

Hi there,
I was wondering if anyone could help me find out if my actual graphic card (ATI Radeon 9650 256MB) is my best option running Final cut pro studio and other graphics software or is there something better like the (ATI radeon X1900).
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
dual 2.7 Ghz PowerPC G5 Mac OS X (10.4.8) 5 GB SDRAM

Hi,
you can not have ATI X1900 G5 card for your computer. This is a PCIe card and you have AGP - but I suppose you know that.
So, the best option for you (and better than Radeon 9650) is ATI X800XT or NVIDIA 6800 Ultra DDL. They are similiar (in performance) cards - it depends on the test. Check this sites:
http://www.barefeats.com/rad9650.html
http://www.barefeats.com/radx800.html
http://www.barefeats.com/quad03.html
Hope it helps,
Marek.

X6-00 Not fully charging

Hi
My Nokia X6-16 GB is not fully charging. when i put it on chaging for one day it keep on charging.. Its not stopping the charging when fully charged. please help me.
Regards
Devanand

Hi Alcopops,
Thank you for posting and welcome to the forum.
Try to customize the Multimedia Settings of your phone for you to send large size of photos through MMS. Go to Messaging, select Options and then go to Settings. Once done, tap on Multimedia Message and then select Image Size. From there, you will be having an option to change it from small to large. If this doesn't work, consider double checking it with your Service Provider as they may limit the size of MMS messages. If the inserted picture exceeds this limit, the device may make it smaller so that it can be sent by MMS. And also, make sure that the device is running its latest software.
Try this and let us know the outcome.
Cheers,
periwinkle28

Radeon 9650 image not fully scaled

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for