Rage 128 PCI video card no deep sleep

Does anybody know of a PCI video card that I can use in my Quicksilver for a third monitor that will allow deep sleep. The Rage 128 does not.

Hi: That video card is not compatible with Windows Vista or W7.

Similar Messages

MAC G4 RAGE 128 PCI GRAPHIC don't work with SAMSUNG E2220N

I connect POWER MAC G4 to a samsung E2220N monitor (VGA cable)
The power mac recognize the monitor and propose all mode.
I chose 1920x1080 resolution.
The power MAC G4 work well in this mode
But when I want to restart the power MAC, It seems to block on boot with no start sound
and a black screen.
So I connect the old screen in 1024x768 mode and on power up the mac starts normally.
The power mac G4 has a RAGE 128 PCI card with 16MB RAM ROM version 113-574070-204
What can I do ? update VGA card firmware ? make the mac start in 1024x768 mode then switch to 1920x1080 ? ...

Welcome!
The Rage 128 card is pretty limited by today's technology. With older Macs, it was common for the computer to start to a fixed default resolution and then change to the user's setting after all the extensions and preferences loaded. It's possible that the card or the monitor are trying for an unsupported resolution at startup.
make the mac start in 1024x768 mode then switch to 1920x1080
If performance on the hi-res setting is acceptable, this would be more cost-effective than a new video card. Finding Mac PCI video cards is getting harder as they have not been made in for ~5 years. A used ATI 128 Nexus would double the VRAM to 32MB but the GPU† is basically the same and you now have.
An original Radeon Mac edition card would be excellent (32MB); it's successor, the Radeon 7000 would be an improvement over what you now have but its GPU was not quite as powerful as the original Radeon. The last PCI Mac video card was the ATI Radeon Mac Edition 9200. It basically had the Radeon 7000's GPU but carried 128MB VRAM. However, it does work as well in OS9 if you need to use that system.
What can I do ? update VGA card firmware ?
Unfortunately, since AMD bought ATI, it has bee much harder find Mac resources on their site. I failed with a brief look this morning--will tried later today with a more thorough search.
Allan
† --GPU = graphics processing unit.

Driver for the ati rage 128 ultra graphics card

WE ARE SUPPILED SOLORIES 8 (INTEL BASED) 02/02 TO ONE OF MY CUSTOMER.WE TRY TO INSTALL ON HP XE 320 PC.GRPHICS CARD DRIVER WAS NOT SELLECTING AUTOMATICALLY.IN THAT SYSTEM ATI RAGE 128 ULTRA GRAPHICS CARD(32MB ).WE ARE TRYING DIFFERNT ATI CHIPSET BUT NOT LOADING O/S FINALLY WE SELECT 640*480 STANDARD DRIVER AND LOADING COMPLTELY.I REQUIRE DRIVER FOR ATI RAGE 128 ULTRA DRIVERS.CAN YOU PL. PROVIDE ME.

Hello,
the drivers have been supplied with patch 109401-10. Maybe there are laters revisions.
Patch-ID# 109401-10
Keywords: security X11 6.4.1_x86 video driver ati 810 matrox nvidia s3 kdmconfig
Synopsis: SunOS 5.8_x86: Updated video drivers and fixes
Date: Jul/23/2001
Solaris Release: 8_x86
SunOS Release: 5.8_x86
Best regards
Michael

NForce 420 + PCI video card

Okay here's my question I have a 16mb ATI All in Wonder 128 pro video card with pci bus. I want to use the features of the all in wonder but still use my nForce onboard video can this be done, with out screwing my video to hell?

Okay excellent I didn't want to throw it in until I confirmed with you guys I was pretty sure it was gonna be okay ........ I just updated my old system you see........ it was orignally a
Pentium pro 200
Matrox mystique card
64mb of edo memory
2gig HD
12x cdr
that was in 95
Anyway as of today it's a
Pentium 2 Overdrive processor running at 333mhz
256mb of edo
50gig HD
52x burner
16xdvd
64mb Geforce 2 PCI *no AGP SLOT*
and a 300watt powers suply ......
I'am still amazed at how well this machine still runs.
The geforce replaced my All in wonder that was previously there............. So all I have to do is pop the card in and set PCI video to 1st in the bios install drivers ............ And I'm good to go....

Windows 7 - Pci-to-Pci Bridge (Error: Code 10) - PCI Video Card

Before I state my issues I will list what I'm running and what I'm trying to accomplish.
I'm running Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit edition, not the Beta or RC. I have 3 video cards in my possession (listed below).
- (PCIe) Evga GTX260
- (PCI) Evga 9400GT
- (PCI) Evga Fx5500
Out of those 3 cards I only use the GTX260 and the 9400GT. I had to 'retire' the Fx5500 because the latest WHQL (certified) drivers only provide support as far down as the "6 series" Nvidia cards. Unfortunately the Fx5500 is a "5 series" and falls below that line. I have already tried to use the GTX260 and Fx5500 in previous versions of Windows (XP and Vista), but there is no way to download and install two separate drivers for two of the same make of video card - you'll get nothing but errors. There is the option of going to a place like guru3d.com and downloading a custom supported driver that covers both the GTX260 and Fx5500, but the drivers are not certified and lack support. Therefore, I purchased and now use the 9400GT which is covered under the drivers for the GTX260 and eliminates the need for messing around with custom drivers. Also, the 9400GT has a better graphics processor and more memory than the Fx5500, so it was time to upgrade anyway.
Now that you have some background info here is my issue Whenever I install the 9400GT I get a second 'pci-to-pci bridge' entry (the other entry has no errors) that shows up under 'System Devices' in the Device Manager. The second pci-to-pci bridge entry has a yellow triangle with an exclamation mark on it that refers to a problem. When you check the properties of this device it more or less says that Windows has detected a problem (Error Code 10). The GTX260 still works and even shows up under the 'Display Adapters' as a GTX260, but no entry for the 9400GT exists. I have tried the 9400GT in both PCI slots and each time it does the same thing. If I pull out the GTX260 and ONLY run the 9400GT, I still get the pci-to-pci bridge issue, BUT I do get a picture and can boot into Windows 7 without a hitch. When I do this there is still nothing listed under the 'Display Adapters' as a 9400GT or even a VGA compatible device.
After messing around with this for 10 hours (yes, I said 10 hours) I decided to dig out my retired PCI video card (the Fx5500). When I installed this card I had no 2nd pci-to-pci bridge entry appear under 'System Devices', and the one that was listed had no yellow triangle or error codes. I then checked under 'Display Adapters' and Windows 7 had recognized it as a VGA compatible device and was asking for drivers.
I have now concluded that there is definitely no issue with the motherboard or any of my hardware (including video cards). At first EVGA Support and I had suspected that the motherboard may be bad because of all of the pre-diagnostic steps I had taken during my 10 hour ordeal. I'm not going to list everything I did because it would literally take 3 hours to type it all in. Just believe me when I say that I have tried most things including but not limited to the latest bios updates (flashed 4 times and completely reset to ensure accuracy), custom IRQ management, entire OS re-installation X2, multiple/latest chipset drivers installed, multiple/latest video drivers installed, memtest testing, complete hardware teardown and re-build (adding one device at a time), and MUCH more. The only thing I did not try was installing a different OS other than Windows 7 64-bit to see if I could replicate the issue. This is a waste of time though because lets say that I install Windows XP Pro and the 9400GT doesn't have this issue... Well, that's great, but who gives a damn about XP Pro when I have been using it for the last 9 years and when I have a full version of Windows 7 that I want to use? I'm certainly not going to run XP Pro over Windows 7 just to use this PCI video card. Second, if I install XP Pro and it still gives me the same pci-to-pci bridge error then again, I've only wasted more time because if its not going to work in either OS then Im sure as hell not going to leave XP Pro installed when I can use Windows 7.
Thanks,
piyush

Maybe stupid question now but has your posting anything to do with Toshiba and Toshiba notebooks?

M58p 7479 PCI Video Card

I have been searching on this subject for a while now and a lot has been discussed about PCI-E video cards for M58p models but I haven't really found many topics on PCI video cards for M58p models.
I'm looking for a way to stream videos from my M58p to my TV. One way to do it is to use a DisplayPort > HDMI convertor for the video and using an external sound card (for digital sound) to stream the audio. However, what I am afraid for is that the two won't be synchronized so therefore I looked for other options such as adding a video card. However, I never thought it would be so difficult to find a video card that is compatible to this model.
My question is whether someone can help me with advising on what to do? Any idea which video cards would be good and suitable for my situation?

Have you read this thread: http://forums.lenovo.com/t5/A-M-and-Edge-Series-ThinkCentre/ThinkCentre-M58p-Graphics-Card-Whitelist...

PCI video card replacement for PowerMac G3 (Blue and White)

Hi, I am new to this forum. I apologize if this issue has been addressed before, but I have been reading over the forum for the last 2 days and tried all the steps I could find. I have an old PowerMac G3 (Blue and White).
It used to run fine. I had a friend with a similar computer and he
needed a video card, so I gave him the one in my Mac G3, because I was not using it at the time.
Now, I have decided I want to use it. I am running into an issue with the video (It takes PCI), I get no display, but I can hear the hard drive spin, it lights up, I hear the Apple "ding".
I have about 6 PCI video cards laying around, and I have tried all of them, resetting the CUDA each time. Still cannot get a display.
I have tried different slots on the motherboard, checked the PRAM battery, (it was good). Tried booting off a live Linux CD for power PCs, tried the commandoption+pr until I hear the apple "ding" go off 2x, I have tried a different monitor and monitor cable.
Nothing seems to work, I need to know what I should try next.
Thank you for your help in this matter.

"I have about 6 PCI video cards laying around, and I have tried all of them, resetting the CUDA each time. Still cannot get a display."
If these graphics cards are designed for use in PCs, they won't work in your Mac. Compatible graphics cards must be programmed with a Mac ROM. Some "PC" cards can have their EEPROM chip flashed with a Mac ROM, provided that someone has extracted the particular Mac ROM code for the card in question. A web search will provide leads for that. If you just want a decent graphics card, go for a Radeon 7000 Mac Edition (2002 vintage card). If you check eBay, you should be able to find a flashed "PC" Radeon 7000 card. I'd try to get the one with 64 MBs of DDR memory, as opposed to the 32 MB model. If you don't mind spending more $$, you can find a more current PCI graphics card for your G3, like the Radeon 9200 at Other World Computing.

Info wanted: ICE Avid Blue PCI Video Card ?

Picked up a used quicksilver, with a ICE Avid Blue PCI Video Card PN: 790-0202-00
Wanting to know more info about this card, what software is used with it etc . .
Appreciate any help

Hi Patrick, my pure guess is some of the older Avid Video products...
http://www.avid.com/US/products

Another PCI video card issue

Hello,
I bought my daughter this Lenovo 3000 h210 from Tigerdirect.com
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=4167690&CatId=2630
She has an nVidia gForce 8450 PCI card she wants to put in the 1 vacant PCI slot. When she does that, the machine will not even boot up. If she takes the card back out, it boots up fine.
The PCI card does not require a seperate power connection, and she replaced the OEM power supply with a 550w one.
I keep reading about possibly having to go into the BIOS and disable the onboard video. I don't have direct access to that computer since she lives in another state, but she is telling me that there are only 2 choices, PCI-PEG and PEG-PCI. She says she had tried both settings and it still will not boot with the PCI graphics card installed.
Any idea how to fix this?

I was unable to find an answer, but was able to get the machine up and running. They took the PCI card back and swapped it for a PCI Express card. They plugged that one in and it worked immediately. So, I am guessing that this particular machine will not work with a PCI video card.
I hope this helps someone.

Is the new GMA X3100 144 MB with 4 GB RAM better than 128 MB video card?

Hello,
I am trying to decide on buying the new MacBook with the GMA X3100 video card or an older MacBook Pro with 128 MB video card, or possibly even the 256 MB video card if I can find a good deal.
I was thinking if I put 4 GB of ram in the new MacBook the shared memory would be fine and I would get some good usage out of the computer.
I will be using this computer for Adobe CS3 Web PRemium, photoshop, dreamweaver etc.
I also want to use Final Cut Studio 2 on this computer, and I know that it will not work as efficiently as my iMac 2.4 with 4 GB ram with 256 MB video card, but I mostly want to work on Motion videos and a little final cut pro 6 editing.
So, what are your thoughts guys? I have looked through the forums and haven't found the exact information I am looking for.
Any information you need from me?

Anyone else have experience with this topic?
I am looking for tests done or some other form of information. I have been searching for benchmarking tests with no luck for my question of 4 GB of RAM on new 2.2 ghz macbook with 144 mb shared video card compared to macbook pro with 128 or 256 video card separate.

Questions regarding ATI Rage 128 Pro graphics card in Sawtooth

Hi, i was checking on the web regarding the specs of my Sawtooth and stumbled upon this page: http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/powermacg4/stats/powermac_g4_400agp.html
My Sawtooth comes with the ATI Rage 128 Pro graphics card. Its indicated the max resolution support is 1920x1200. I was wondering if it is able to support resolution 1680x1050 for wide monitors like the Samsung 205BW? Have anyone tried using a wide screen monitor with the Rage 128 pro card? Does it work well?
I'm not a gamer and i don't intend to upgrade the graphic card. (Though it would be nice to get my hands on the a Radeon 8500 or 9000.) I mainly do graphic work, and currently using a Samsung 740B monitor set at 1280x1028 resolution.

Hi, I posted the exact same question in another forum, and i was directed to this link: http://forums.appleinsider.com/showthread.php?t=58395
So i guess it does work. Though maybe, to a certain extend, like mentioned by one of the forum members:
"My old Sawtooth 400MHz G4 had an ATI Rage 128. It drove my 20inch Apple Cinema Display (the current design) with DVI. Not the best graphics, but it could do it, and without any hacks too..."
Hope this helps with anyone having the same questions... : )

KT3 Ultra: AGP vs. PCI Video Cards

I am running an ATI Radeon 7000 AGP 64Mb video card on a KT3 ultra. I want to upgrade to a 128Mb video card. The KT3's AGP slot only goes up 4X. Most cards I have looked at are 8X only. Is it possible to run a 128Mb PCI video card. The MSI tech web page is lacking...please help.

any new agp card will work in it
a x 8 card will just run at x4
but as thats just a few percent slower who cares

P35 Neo2 PCI video card

Hi All,
I want use an extra video card and bought a PCI GS8400 512Mb.
After installing the card in the system the card is not recognized by the OS (Windows 7 U64).
There is a yellow exclamation mark in the device manager at the PCI to Standard PCI Bridge.
When I open the device is says 'Device could not start error 10'.
Does my board support video cards in a PCI slot?
P.S.: I tried the card in two other systems an it works fine.
Spec's:
Q6600 2.4 GHz at 3.2GHz.
8GB Ram.
GTX275 PCI-E video card.
GS8400 PCI video card.
2 x 30GB SSD RAID 0 disk for system
300GB disk for data
Windows 7 Ultimate 64.
Any ideas?
Regards,
PJGS.

Ok this what is tried last night:
- Fresh install Windows 7 Ultimate x64. Still an error on the PCI Standard PCI-to PCI Bridge. GS8400 card not recognized.
- Fresh instal Windows XP 64. Everything OK. GS 8400 card recognized and working.
- Upgrade XP 64 to Windows 7 Pro X64. An error on the PCI Standard PCI-to PCI Bridge. GS8400 card not recognized.
- I checked my other Intel based system and everything workes fine.
This system has an Intel ICH7 chipset instead of a Intel ICH9.
This must be a driver problem or a Windows 7 problem, and as so often the user is stuck in the middle.

ATI, Rage 128 pro display card won't work on 23"hd cinema display Help....

My rage 128 pro won't work on this 23" display, it simply went black, i would like to know if I can purchase a vga to dvi adapter to solve this problem without buying a new video card? thanks
G4 400mhz Mac OS X (10.4.3)

Are you in the US?
Europe?
These 6-pin cords are readily available for not much money, but the searches are toturous, often involving references to the G5. Like this one from Amazon (US):
http://www.amazon.com/PCIe-Power-Cable-nVidia-Video/dp/B002UR1654/ref=sr_1_1?ie= UTF8&qid=1388019109&sr=8-1&keywords=6-pin+aux+power+G5

Best PCI-X / PCI video card for Solaris 10?

I don't mean "best" in the "latest, greatest, fastest" sense, I mean best to denote visual properties and rendering, support, basically. My current machine (Compaq SR5250NX) has a PCI bus ATI Radeon 9250 (256MB RAM) that XSun detects and uses as an ATI 9200 Pro AGP. There are all sorts of performance/visual issues...when I minimize a window, it takes a second or two (literally) to minimize and you can watch it "draw down." Or sometimes when I minimize a window, it minimizes from the top down, and the desktop is redrawn vertically, very slowly. (So you can watch the window disappear top down.) This is *extremely frustrating and makes the entire desktop experience unpleasant. This is unfortunate because I really like JDS.
So, which card has the best Solaris 10 (XSun) support? It can be either PCI or PCI-X. All I do is write text documents, program, and other general tasks. No graphics work or anything of that sort. I don't care if it's old and I have to get it used...it just has to have awesome support and enough power to handle JDS and normal apps (Sun Studio, SO 8, FF3, etc). I'm on a bit of a budget, so if it's possible to get this card for around $100..that'd be great.
*Yes, I've read the HCL, and I know which cards are on there as supported, but it doesn't say anything about which card has the best support.
Thanks,
~Slow
Edited by: SlowToady on Nov 18, 2008 6:43 PM
reason: typo
Edited by: SlowToady on Nov 18, 2008 6:44 PM

Although I prefer ATI for personal use on other OSes, my last two Solaris workstations have had Nvidia Quadro video cards in them, and they've both worked very well. My previous workstation (A Sun w2100z that died a couple months ago) had a Quadro NVS 280, my new workstation has a Quadro Fx 1700, which performs extremely well even at 1920 x 1280. The Fx 1700 isn't what you would
call cheap, though.
You might want to try pick up a used Quadro NVS (at least something in the 2xx series), or one of the lower models in the Quadro Fx series.
Tim
PS: I'm going to be asking nearly an indentical question to this one in a minute, except about audio cards rather than video. :-|

Rage 128 PCI video card no deep sleep

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for