Range check affects scopes

I have noticed that if I have some scopes up (mainly RGB Parade and Waveform monitor) and turn on range checking, it changes the output on the scopes. So what is the most accurate way of using the scopes - with range checking on or off? And why does it change them in the first place?

Changing the different range check options does not affect the scopes, rather it seems to be a range check on or off difference. I was thinking the stripes from the check may be affecting the scopes, but there is absolutely no motion on the scopes when the stripes are moving. Give it a shot - load up a clip of any video, load up the scopes (try the luminance layout) and turn the range checking on and off. I can reproduce this on all the FCP machines I have tried (ver 5.1.2), so chances are it will do it for you too. It almost makes the scopes bold, and it changes the whites and black levels enough to make the scope unusable without knowing which way is correct. As a side note, the first link you posted at larryjordan.biz seems to now be incorrect. I took his test jpeg and my scopes still showed the levels of the boxes outside of the title safe zone.

Similar Messages

How to insure range check elimination optimization is occurring

I'm wondering if there is a way to tell whether or not the optimizer is employing the range check elimination optimization on a particular loop. Although I'd rather not, I can generate the assembly code via -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, but I'm not exactly sure what I'm looking for. Any help is greatly appreciated.
I'm also wondering if the range check optimization only occurs for arrays, or if it is used when the object being accessed is a List for example, although once I have an answer to my first question, I can investigate this on my own.
Thanks!

I suspect it's left deliberately unspecified to allow flexibility among versions and platforms, and even within a given run on a given JVM. However, everything I've read strongly suggests that [url http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Interviews/devinsight_1/]writing dumb code, such as your basic, standard array loop, will enable that optimization to be performed (as hotspot is specifically tuned to common idioms):
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
// do stuff that does change the value of i or arr
}Alternatively, using a foreach loop should be expected to generate this kind of code.
As for the bottleneck, is what you're doing in one loop iteration so small that it's reasonable to expect that that operation, plus incrementing i will not dwarf the array bounds comparison? Or have you been able to determine that the check itself is the bottleneck?

Range checking in Schema

Can schema allows auto range checking?
Or do I need to specifiy the max and min range in the schema and check it in my code?
Thanks
Eva

Hi Eva,
I didnt understand your question very clearly. Maybe what you are asking is that is it possible to automatically check the range entered in the XML file by its schema file.
The answer to this is yes. There are 2 attributes which we can set... maxValue and minValue.
Minvalue specifies the low end of the range of possible values. Maxvalue specifies the high end. Minvalue must be less than or equal to maxvalue .
An Example qould be
<scalar digits="4" decimals="3" minvalue="-9999" maxvalue="8888" minexclusive="true"/>
I hope this helps.

Range check of LabVIEW controls

In LabVIEW, one can specify that a control have a valid range of entries (i.e. min/max/increment). If you run this VI from LabVIEW, everything works great. However, when that VI is invoked from TestStand, values outside the range are allowed to be passed in. Is there a good/easy way to apply the same constraints on the TestStand side, or do we have to perform range checking on all user-supplied inputs?

When you're creating your sequence file (in the seq editor), you list your step name, step type, etc, then you specify module and point to the VI you want this step to call. At that point in the seq editor, you specify any parameter defaults you'd like to over write.

Disabling range checking during array access.

I believe there should be a way to accomplish the above via some javac option.
Context: I'm writing a pure Java-based volume renderer (i.e., no JNI), with emphasis on speed. I'm not happy with the fact that even though I can trivially guarantee legal array indices to my 3D-array accesses (say, via outer for-loops covering the volume extents... a construct I can't escape anyways in the context of my application), Java continues to distrust my programming abilities and goes on 'needlessly' performing range checking for me!
I fully appreciate the fact that in 99% of the cases, most developers would want it the way we have it currently. However, the language should not constrain everybody unnecessarily all the time.
Anyone, any insights on how to work this around (in Java)? Thanks!
Harry

>
Anyone, any insights on how to work this around (in
Java)? Thanks!Short of writing your own VM implementation this won't be happening.
Alternatively you can change your approach in a way that this is not a bottleneck for you.
But honestly this question has come up before and while you may not want to hear it the short answer is no. So I would recommend you look in a different direction to solve your problem.

Range check for numeric values in varchar2 type column

SQL oracle 10g windows XP
I have a table which has column of type varchar2 e.g
create table osa_gms_mailbox(reg_address varchar2(60),bin_address varchar2(60));
let us insert some sample rows:
insert into osa_gms_mailbox values ('8000','8000');
insert into osa_gms_mailbox values ('9000','9000');
insert into osa_gms_mailbox values ('[email protected]','[email protected]');
If i try to run the query :
select reg_address from (
select reg_address from osa_gms_mailbox
MINUS
select reg_address from osa_gms_mailbox where
regexp_like(reg_address,'^[a-z]+|[A-Z]+$')) temp
where to_number(temp.reg_address) between 1000 and 10000;
or
select reg_address from (
select reg_address from osa_gms_mailbox
MINUS
select reg_address from osa_gms_mailbox where
regexp_like(reg_address,'^[a-z]+|[A-Z]+$'))
where to_number(reg_address) between 1000 and 10000;
it gives ORA-01722: invalid number .
how can i get the numeric comparision done for varchar2 field and exclude the rows which have atleast one alphabet (a-z,A-Z)
Thanks

Hi
Please check this sample , it may useful to you
/*Creating a Table*/
Create Table CHECKVARCHAR( CheckValue Varchar2(20) );
/* Inserting values in to the column with numbers and Strings */
Insert into CHECKVARCHAR Values ( 1000 );
Insert into CHECKVARCHAR values ( 2000 );
Insert into CHCEKVARCHAR values ( 10000 );
Insert into CHECKVARCHAR values ( 'Abc' );
Insert into CHECKVARCHAR values ( 'zyx' );
/*Here is the Query to avoid Invalid Number */
Select * from
( Select CheckValue
from Checkvarchar
where Ascii( Substr( CheckValue,1,1 ) ) not between 65 and 122 )
where CheckValue between 1000 and 10000;

Problem with ATP check in release of process order

Hi gurus,
I have next problem in automatic release of process order:
No checking group is maintained for product 000000000791104015, plant VFMX in matl master.
Situation:
I've some materials without MRP views in material master data but apparently this doesn't affect to release order. In this case, this material hasn't this views and it's impossible to release the order. I'm supposing the problem is not related with the fill up of this views or the field in material master data, because for other materials with the same situation the release is running.
Anybody has any idea?
Thanks a lot,
Regards

Dear ,
You are facing this error because :
- you have activated avaialbility check, but checkingb group is not maintained in material master of the component
- if maintained in material master, in configuraion checking group and checking rule combination is not maintained
- if above both are maintained then in the checking control for the order type is maintained, but in the control you maintained the setting that - release not possible if no availability, hence change it to user control option.
*So Goto MM02- material master -MRP3 view -Maintain the Availability check field as 01/02 as applicable for components in the production *
For more clarification , you can investigate the below : For production order avilablity check and release u have should following settings.
1. Define checking Group - SPRO
2. Define checking Rule- SPRO.
3. Define scope of check - OPJJ - Scope of the avilabilty check is defined for the Combination of Checking group and Checking rule. Check contol is defined for each comination of checking group and checking rule.
4.Define Chek control -OPJK : Checking rule is linked to Ordertype/Plant combination.
while releasing the production order system will do avilability check as per the settings In OPJK for ordertype/plant combination.
Hope this is clear to you
Regards
JH
Edited by: Jiaul Haque on Jun 20, 2010 9:20 AM

Why doesn't SignalExpress communicate with TDS3054B scope?

HELP!
I have a TDS3054B scope with v3.39 firmware installed on it. I want to communicate with it using SignalExpress but can't! I can see the instrument in Measurement & Automation Explorer (v4.2.0.3001).  It shows up as GPIB0::1::INSTR. I have a USB-GPIB cable going from my laptop to the scope. The laptop is running LabVIEW 8.2. I have installed the drivers for the scope from NI's website but still can't get it working...
I can communicate with the scope using Tektronix's OpenChoice Desktop software, but that software is limited in what it can do...
Any suggestions?

Thanks again, Kent.
The article helped some, but I still don't have it working...
In MAX, under the IVI Drivers >> Logical Names, I have the name MyScope. For the General tab, I have the Driver Session listed as tkds30xx & a Description "TDS3054B oscilloscope".
In MAX, under the IVI Drivers >> Driver Sessions >> tkds30xx >> General tab, I have the following:
Initialization Options enabled: Cache, Range Check, Query Instrument Status;     Simulate With: Don't Simulate;     Driver Setup: tkds30xx;     Description: TDS 3000 Series
In MAX, under the IVI Drivers >> Driver Sessions >> tkds30xx >> Hardware tab, I have the following:
Hardware Assets: Name - TDS3054B (checked); Resource Descriptor - GPIB0::1::INSTR
In MAX, under the IVI Drivers >> Driver Sessions >> tkds30xx >> Software tab, I have the following:
Software Module: <None>; my only choices are <None> or NIDMM.
In MAX, under the IVI Drivers >> Driver Sessions >> tkds30xx >> Virtual Names tab, I have the following:
Virtual Name: CHANNEL1, CHANNEL2, CHANNEL3, CHANNEL4;     Physical Name: CH1, CH2, CH3, CH4
In MAX, under the IVI Drivers >> Driver Sessions >> tkds30xx >> Initial Settings tab, I have nothing.
In LabVIEW SignalExpress, I go to Add Step >> Acquire Signals >> IVI Acquire >> IVI Scope Acquire. The Step Setup box is displayed. On the Configuration tab >> Device section >> IVI session name, I select Create New... Another dialoge box opens with an IVI session name in it. I change it to MyScope (same as in MAX), choose the Resource Descriptor GPIB0::1::INSTR (same as in MAX), but can't select an instrument driver. The only thing available under Instrument driver is a check mark. I can't select it for some unknown reason. I hit the OK button & the box closes, returning to the Step Setup screen. I try to run the step once & get an error stating:
"ivi_IviScope Initialize With Options.vi<ERR>
Driver Status: (Hex 0xBFFA1207) Primary Error: (Hex 0xBFFA1207) The item does not exist in the collection.
Elaboration: tkds30xx"
Back to square 1...

Same nr range in Invoice Verification (MIRO) and FI document

Dear all can you please help to solve this issue?
We would like to have the same number range for invoice verification and for financial document, what we have to do?
Regards
Marco

Please follow the steps as below
Step 1. Maintain FI document number range. Use transaction OMR4 and go to Number range for document types in FI. Select the company code for which you want to create the new number range interval and click on the change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert interval button on top of the screen.for example, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 5299999999. Don't forget to set the external number range check box (Ext).
Step 2. Assign FI number range to FI document types. The second step is to assign the number range created in step 1 to the FI document type for invoices. Again use transaction OMR4 and go to Document type. Double-click on the document type, which you are using for LIV invoices. In my example, I used the SAP standard document type RE. In the number range field, assign the new number range interval 52
Step 3. Maintain MM document number ranges. Use transaction OMRJ and click on change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert button at the top of the screen. For MM documents, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 5299999999. For the internal number range assignment, do not set the external number range check box (Ext).
Step 4. Update MM number range assignment. The last step is to assign the MM number range to your MM transaction via IMG menu path Materials Management>Logistics Invoice Verification>Incoming Invoice>Number Assignment>Maintain Number Assignments for Logistic Documents>Transaction Assign Number ranges. Two transactions are available. LIV contains the following two internal transactions that are used for the MM document number determination:
RD: manual invoice entry (MIRO)
RS: cancel, reverse invoice (MR8M), evaluated receipt settlement (MRRL), EDI invoice receipt, invoicing plan (MRIS), and revaluation (MRNB).
You need to update the number range interval for transaction RD.
hope now that things r clear
reward accordingly

How can we assign a different scope of planning in MTO scenario?

Hi,
We are using MTO scenario. In this case, during sales order creation checking control AE is getting triggered. We want to use a different scenario during rescheduling transaction. But as per my analysis, V_V2 is also calling the same AE checking control eventhough we assigned a different checking control for Back order processing.
In this case, can we assign a different checking control (scope of check) for back order processing?
Regards.

Let me explain my requirement here....
This is a kind of trading or sub-contracting. Initially we will give the forecast to vendor...but Vendor will start the finished product production only after getting the confirmed order from us. Hence we thought to use strategy 50. So we will create a PO to Vendor only after getting a confirmed sales order from customer.
But in strategy 50 ATP confirmation is based on PIR. Hence we created a new requirement class (copy of 45 with ATP active). So in this new strategy ATP is against actual receipts instead of PIRs.
But sometimes Vendor may not be able to supply as per lead-time...and he may postpone the delivery date. In this case we are getting exception message 10 for the PO...even though PO is specific to a sales order. Still rescheduling job (V_V2) is not populating the new confirmation date as it is referring to the TRLT.
Hence we want to use ATP based on TRLT during sales order creation. And during rescheduling we want to use a different scope of check ('without TRLT' and with 'No storage location check'). Hence we created a new checking rule for rescheduling and this we assigned for that specific plant.
As per my observation, rescheduling job is not picking the scope of check that is assigned for rescheduling....it is calling the same checking rule AE during rescheduling also.
So my question here is... can we call a different scope of check during rescheduling run while using make to order strategy?
Regards.

PR number range issue

Dear All,
While creating PR I am getting an error "Number range 01 for object BANF not defined"
Please help
Thanks

Hi,
If you are using external number range check the number range in spro for PR for the required doc type and give the number in that range

How to change number range for document type ?

Dear All
Experts
How to change the number range for document types for entry view? I am trying to change the number range for all document type as per defined ranges in FBN1, but at the time of saving document type and number range the system is throwing error message as
Doc. type C1: Number range 07 is used for ledger L6 with doc. type AE
Message no. FAGL_LEDGER_CUST093
I have defined a leading ledger in system too with these settings
1)     Define ledger for accounting.
2)     Defining currencies for it.
3)     Defining ledger group for the same.
4)     Defining accounting principles
5)     Assignment of principles to leading ledger.
Are there any extra settings required for leading ledger settings?
I have some doubts those are :-
How document types defined at ledger level?
How to define them at leading ledger level? (Like my case)
Focus on this will be appreciable.
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.

hi ,
The document numbers in the leading ledger and the non leading ledgers should be in sync, they should not have any differences, so incase you are trying to change the number range for C1, the number range 07 is already been assigned to doc type AE. i guess you have cant use 07 for C1. may be you can try out with an other number range. check this and let me know if you are able to do this.
coming to
1.How document types defined at ledger level?
2.How to define them at leading ledger level? (Like my case)
Ans 1. please try defining document types for entry view in a ledger.
path : SPRO- financial accounting new -financial accounting global settings new - document -document types -define document types for entry view in ledger.
upon prompt enter the ledger and go ahead creating the number ranges for the document types.
Hope this helps.
Regards
amrutha

Is there an "Out of Range" Function in LabVIEW?

Howdy,
My issue is I have an input value that is compared to an upper and lower limit. If the input is within the range I want the program to do nothing. If the input is below the lower value I need to send a "TRUE" signal to a relay. If the input is above the upper value I need to send a "FALSE" signal to the relay. Does anyone have a clever way of getting this to work?
Attached is a example of what I'm trying to do for your veiwing pleasure.
Thanks
Attachments:
LimitsExample.vi ‏57 KB

I would just use a couple of Select functions with the results being based on the comparison to the upper limit and lower limit.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
Attachments:
Range Check.png ‏12 KB

Scope of List - ALV

Dear Consultants,
We have taken a Z Copy of ME2N to add a few fields. Now we are not able display the report in ALV . But the ALV view is displayed in standard ME2N transaction. Kindly advise.
Regards
Irfan Ahmed

Hi Irfan,
check in scope of list if you have maintained ZALV.

People scope no longer finding items

Hello,
I have an issue with the People scope saying it has 0 items and within SharePoint search where it doesn't find anyone. Last night before leaving work the people search was working fine and returning search results within the people scope
and the people scope had 1500+ items within it which is the correct amount. When I returned to work this morning I found that the people search was no longer finding any results and when I checked the scope it said it had 0 items, so I cleared the index and ran
a full crawl, again nothing was placed into the people scope.
Now there are no errors but there are a lot of warnings, which relate to each user profile and other pages within the MySite such as Person.aspx:
http://sharepoint-mysite-dev:80/Person.aspx?accountname=DOMAIN\is00001
The content for this address was excluded by the crawler because this item was marked with a no-index meta-tag. To index this item, remove the meta-tag and recrawl.
Now from last night to this morning nothing has been changed on the SharePoint servers as I'm the only person with access to them, I've checked the settings within MySite and all the profiles are still there and the MySite site works correctly. I've
double checked the Crawl Rules, Log, Content Sources and the Scopes and nothing has changed.
Within the MySite I've also checked under Site Actions > Site Settings > Search and offline avaliability to make sure indexing is enabled, I've also rebooted the servers within the farm to see if that would resolve the issue. To give further
detail, we currently run an incremental crawl every 5 mins and a full crawl at 0:00am every night. If anyone could help me here it would be appreciated, if you require further information just let me know.
Thanks

Go into the User Profile Service Application administration page and make sure you are still properly importing user profiles. Central Admin > Application Management > Manage Service Applications > click on your User Profile Service Application
to get to the management page. Look at the right and see if you have an appropriate number for total profiles. Click on Manage User Profiles and search for an account you know should be there. If you verify these to be working correctly, then go to your Search
Administration page and under Content Sources make sure you have the profile protocol listed. (ex. sps3://sharepoint-mysite-dev:80/)
Let me know the results from that and we can go from there.
Adam Preston - MCTS WSS/MOSS | Blog:
http://sptwentyten.wordpress.com | Twitter:
@_apreston

Range check affects scopes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for