RAR Error- Approver not found

Dear Experts,
I am facing following problem in RAR component.
When i am changing Function associated with Risk Id. It gives me error Approver not found.
What is to be done to tackle above error ?
Rgds,
Saurabh

Dear Saurabh
Have you configured the workflow in CUP to handle the 'Risk Maintenance' in RAR? If not so, please configure the workflow or check for the Custom approver derminator (CAD) in the workflow in CUP, if it is already configured.
Alternatively, if you do not want the workflow to be triggered for changes you make in the Risk, then disable the work flow function, @ RAR - CONFIGURATION TAB-WORKFLOW-RISK MAINTENANCE-CHOOSE OPTION NO.
Regards
Swarna

Similar Messages

CUP Issue in workflow - Approver not found after SP13

Dear All,
We are facing an issue after upgrade to SP13 in CUP. The request is not getting saved and throwing an error - Approver not Found.
We uploaded the xml files also of SP13 after upgrade has completed.
We have not changed the workflow after upgrade and verified all the attributes of Initiator, CAD and approver is already available in CAD - but still we are receiving the error "Approver Not Found"
The same workflow is working succesfully in Production system which is under SP9.
Is this an issue with SP13. If any body has encountered please let us know how to resolve.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Srihari.K

Dear Chinmaya,
Below is the error log
Log :
2011-05-09 08:13:17,375 [SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_25] ERROR NoApproverFoundException in Save request
com.virsa.ae.workflow.NoApproverFoundException: No approvers found for req no : 135, for reqPathId, 209, for path, CHNG_ANZ_Z6 and approver determinator : ANZ_LAC
Also, we tried with simple workflow as well with just 2 attribute logic. Still we received the same error
Thanks and Best Regards,
Srihari.K

AE 5.2 - Detour Workflows - One of the Role Approver not found

Hi All,
My question is regarding using the Detour workflow functionality for the situation below - pls let me know if this possible or if any alternates are available.
- Main path has 2 stages (1) manager approver, (2) Role Approver.
If the Requestor asks for a Role that Does not have a Role Approver we would like to route this request to the Security lead.
- I have created a Detour Path with 1 stages - Secuity lead and associated with Stage 2 (Role approver) of the Main path based on the condition "No Role Owners"
- I still get the error "Approver not found at Stage @@@@"
Is the condition "No Role Owner" in the Detour workflow config for "Role Expert" workflows or for Access requests?
Is it possible to route the Request to Security if the Role being requested does not have a Role Approver? IF yes How?
thanks
T

Hi,
sometimes in the Detour configuration you have the problem that the "Save" action is not saved properly.
If this entry is empty, please go into edit mode and save the detour config again, so that the action will actually display "Save".
Hopefully it works, then.
Regards,
Daniela

GRC CUP Error creating request. Approver not found

Hi,
We just upgrade from GRC CUP 14 to GRC CUP 15.6 support pack.I already performed post upgrade steps and when i try to create a request i am getting approver not found.i didnot change workflow.In stage for role approver we have approver determinator "role".
system log report
com.virsa.ae.workflow.NoApproverFoundException: No approvers found for req no : 493, for reqPathId, 662, for path, PROD_APPRV_PATH and approver determinator : Role
     at com.virsa.ae.workflow.bo.WorkFlowBOHelper.handleApproversTransactions(WorkFlowBOHelper.java:1469)
     at com.virsa.ae.workflow.bo.WorkFlowRequestCreateHelper.handleWFForNewPath(WorkFlowRequestCreateHelper.java:278)
     at com.virsa.ae.workflow.bo.WorkFlowRequestCreateHelper.createNewWorkflow(WorkFlowRequestCreateHelper.java:167)
     at com.virsa.ae.workflow.bo.WorkFlowBO.saveNewWorkflow(WorkFlowBO.java:120)
     at com.virsa.ae.accessrequests.bo.RequestBO.saveNewRequest(RequestBO.java:579)
     at com.virsa.ae.accessrequests.actions.CreateRequestAction.createRequest(CreateRequestAction.java:381)
     at com.virsa.ae.accessrequests.actions.EUCreateRequestAction.createRequestHandler(EUCreateRequestAction.java:135)
     at com.virsa.ae.accessrequests.actions.EUCreateRequestAction.execute(EUCreateRequestAction.java:68)
     at com.virsa.ae.commons.utils.framework.NavigationEngine.execute(NavigationEngine.java:295)
     at com.virsa.ae.commons.utils.framework.servlet.AEFrameworkServlet.service(AEFrameworkServlet.java:431)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.doWork(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:321)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.forward(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:377)
     at com.virsa.ae.commons.utils.framework.servlet.AEFrameworkServlet.service(AEFrameworkServlet.java:461)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.runServlet(HttpHandlerImpl.java:401)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.handleRequest(HttpHandlerImpl.java:266)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:386)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:364)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.invokeWebContainer(RequestAnalizer.java:1039)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.handle(RequestAnalizer.java:265)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Client.handle(Client.java:95)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.request(Processor.java:175)
     at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33)
     at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:104)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:176)
Please let me know solution ASAP.This is high priority.
Thanks
Yakoob.

It looked like some old request stuck in DB.But, not sure about it.I tried by changing the number ranges in configuration by giving the current request number in "from number",but it didn't work.
This is strange some time it gives "error creating request: path not found." and once this error gone then "error creating request : approver not found".
To avoid this i created one more stage by custom approver determinator with application attribute and approver assiged.This stage, i assigned before role approver stage then it worked,Request get created and request get provisioned.
i don't understand why it's not working,if i assigned role approver stage first in a path of workflow.role approver (approver determinator:"role" standard one, "approver" gets from configuration:roles:create role:role approver OR upload from role import).
Please help
Thanks
Yakoob.

5.3 CUP Approver not found error

Hi Experts
Having an issue on CUP. I have created a CAD for my first stage and second stage.
1st Stage (Business Process Owner) HR and linked to approver
2nd Stage (Role type) = Single and linked to approver.
The request is created but when I approve the request at the 1st stage it throws out the the Approver not found error. The role attributes have also been configured accordingly.
Any ideas Experts your help will be appreciated.
regards,
Donovan

Hi
Thanks for the assistance, I've checked on the UME the approver does exist with the necessary authorizations. Maybe it issomething in the config please tell what you did maybe I missed something small in the config. I checked and the CAD in both stages are linked to approvers and they both exist in the ume. And the role itself has been linked with the attributes such as the business process and the role type being single.

AE Approver not found error

Hi All
I have confirmed and configured the custom approver determinator for this i have allso configured the approver under roles
in the attributes section
at business process level.
This is the error below!
Failed to Process your request, Configuration Error, Approvers not found for the following : system_role name
Any assistance on this matter will be appreciated!

Hi Rodger,
I quite sure that when you set up the custom approver based on role it then does not refer to the approvers linked to the role - although I think you should test the following.
Maintain the custom approver you have set-up, click on approvers > add > insert the role name > click on the arrow > then click on the + icon and search for an approver > add > save. Then create a request to see if the approver can be found.
I think that if you want to make use of the approvers that you have loaded in the role attributes then you would use Role as your approver determinator in your stage and not the custom approver determinator that you created.
Regards

Error: Resource not found in FilterOptionCollection. Please help

Hi Experts,
I'm currently implementing Approve Requests at a customer.
I've got the service TASKPROCESSING pointing to ERP_WF. I can see the catalog SAP_FND_TC_TX1 and I've created a tile, pointing to my scenario as defined in the netweaver gateway.
When I go to launchpad the reference error message is displayed.
Details on the word file.
Error Resource not found Filter Option Collection - Approve Requests.docx - Google Drive
Thanks in advance!

Thank you Andre,
We finally solved it. I post the correction for future reference.
The problem was solved by changing the configuration on the assignment of the data provider to the data model.
ZTM_TGW_SVC_MODEL_0001_BE software version was DEFAULT, when it should've been /IWPGW/BWF.
The route in SPRO is: SAP Netweaver->Gateway>OData Channel>Administration>General Settings> Assign Data Provider to Data Model.

Document Contains Errors - Approval not possible

Hi,
We are having issue in our Invoice Workflow.
When ever the approver is trying to approve the document, he is getting the error message "Document Contains Errors -> Approval not possible".
We have verified the document and check for error messages and found the below error messages on the Document.
E BBP_PD 047 Posting period 006 2011 is not open.
The document was submitted some time in the first week of December and as part of AP process the posting period will be closed during the first week of every month. This is a common business case and why is it stopping from posting the doc?
FYI..this Invoice is posted against the WBS element.
Pls give some insight on this and how to address the issue.
Regards,
Satya

Hi,
The posting date in the invoice is referring to the past period which is closed.You will have to change the invoice posting date to current period date and then process.
Regards,
Sanjeev

SPM in CUP in a SAP GRC AC 5.3 -- "Approver not found" & "Path not found"

hello,
I have a problem when I try to do a request.
I have configured the SPM in the CUP in a SAP GRC AC 5.3
I gives me an error about "Error creating request. Approver not found ". When I took out the Manager in the Stage it gave me this error in the request "Error creating request. Path not found".
Best regards.
Pablo Mortera.

You can either type in the configuration, like the what option you selected for approver (CAD or role or...etc), or other way is to capture the change log which shows what was the configuration for that stage....
(Configuration -< Change Log -> Search Change log)
Cheers !!
Zaheer

DADs on WLS 11g (version 10.3.6.0) do not work (Error 404--Not Found)

Actually we use Application Server 10g (version 10.1.2.3.0) for different Forms 10g Applications (roundabout 1000 Forms) and want to change to Forms 11g and Weblogic Server 11g (version 10.3.6.0). A Test-Application on the Weblogic Server works fine, but DAD’s do not work at all.
In Enterprise Manager 10g i can configure DADs within the GUI of the Enterprise Manager, where i can see, if a connection could be established or not.
In Enterprise Manager 11g Fusion Middleware Control this doesn't seem to exist anymore, so i tried to configure the DADs manually, but something has to be wrong or missing, because there is no connection to the database and the following error appears:
Error 404--Not Found
From RFC 2068 Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1:
10.4.5 404 Not Found
The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI. No indication is given of whether the condition is temporary or permanent.
If the server does not wish to make this information available to the client, the status code 403 (Forbidden) can be used instead. The 410 (Gone) status code SHOULD be used if the server knows, through some internally configurable mechanism, that an old resource is permanently unavailable and has no forwarding address.
I added several DAD’s to /opt/oracle/product/Middleware/asinst_1/config/OHS/ohs1/mod_plsql/dads.conf like this:
<Location /pls/jd-download-dev>
SetHandler pls_handler
Order allow,deny
Allow from All
AllowOverride None
PlsqlDatabaseUsername w_web_user_download
PlsqlDatabasePassword @BWKChfgPacV6yQL40lIKZqXUUA9wC4cmAw==
PlsqlDatabaseConnectString jddev TNSFormat
PlsqlNLSLanguage German_Germany.WE8ISO8859P1
PlsqlAuthenticationMode Basic
PlsqlDefaultPage w_anwendung.p_web_show_document
PlsqlAlwaysDescribeProcedure Off
PlsqlErrorStyle DebugStyle
</Location>
The passwords were obfuscated with dadTool.pl and the http-Server restarted with /opt/oracle/product/Middleware/asinst_1/bin/opmnctl restartproc process-type=OHS
The files /opt/oracle/product/Middleware/asinst_1/config/OHS/ohs1/mod_plsql.cache.conf and /opt/oracle/product/Middleware/asinst_1/config/OHS/ohs1/moduleconf.plsql.conf were left unchanged.
Our Test-Application generates the following link
'http://172.106.2.7:9001/pls/jddevdev/B_ARCHIVE.P_ARCHIVE_VIEW?docfid=200'
that seems to be ok, because when i replace IP and port with our old IAS it works fine, but the WebLogic Server generates the above mentioned error.
To get some more information i searched an error_log in /opt/oracle/product/Middleware/asinst_1/diagnostics/logs/OHS/ohs1 but there isn’t any.
I used the following Documentation for configuring the DADs which is for HTTP Server 11g Release 1 (version 11.1.1), because I could not find one for version 10.3.6.0:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/web.1111/e10144/under_mods.htm#i1055269
So probably there are differences between configuring version 10.3.6.0 and version 11.1.1 and so something is wrong configured or missing...
Thank you in advance for your help
Udo

Hi Raj,
it is a Sparc Solaris 10
and yes that's my enviorment.
After some more tests it's seems it's not a real bug but no realy nice working solution.
Eclipse uses for all instances the same secure storage, where OEPE also saves the password.
And if I look right the pasword was saved without the user context, so if you use an other user he takes the same password from the old user.
and I doesn't know how do OEPE check the connection in reality or only reply the last failed login message.
After deleting the complete secure storage and test it again with the juno version it works well.

Why does FCP error "File Not Found" when I try to open my sequences????

I recently updated all of my software and the following day I started getting errors "file not found" when I would try to open a sequence. Now all of my sequences are being lost and I am losing time and money because I can't meet deadlines! This *****!!! With one sequence I had to reedit the entire thing from scratch and when I did for some reason the old one would then open. But the next time I opened FCP both sequences would error out. Following the "file not found" the computer responds with another error "error: out of memory" What the devil is going on with this crap?

I seem to have figured out what my problem was. After trying to build the same project (that failed on the Mac Pro) on my laptop and encountering the same errors, I realized that the problem had to be with one or more of my assets and not my new version of FCP, since my PowerBook is running FCP 5.0.4 and my Mac Pro is running FCP 5.1.2.
In my case the "corrupt" file was a Photoshop PSD file. In the past (FCP 4.5) I was able to use PSD files with hidden layers. I would merge the visible layers into one layer, keep the hidden layers and save the file. Once in FCP, I imported the PSD file and kept right on truckin'. I've done this for years. For some reason now with FCP 5.1.2 (and 5.0.4), that's not flying anymore. Once I "Flattened" the PSD file in Photoshop (deleting all of the hidden layers) I was able to build the project without any errors.
Interestingly, the technique I used to figure out which file was "corrupt" also allowed me to salvage parts of some of my "lost" sequences. I saw this posted in a forum at Creative Cow (creativecow.net). Basically, I opened up the project, clicked the OK button after the File Not Found error, went into the Browser, right clicked on the offending sequence, selected "Make Offline". When I double clicked the sequence it opened in the timeline with all of my assets offline. Then in the timeline, one by one, I right clicked on each clip and selected "Reconnect Media". Once I linked up the media, if I didn't get an error message, I would save as a new project (to salvage what WAS working), and go to the next clip. I did this until I found the offending PSD files.
I hope this helps. Now it's time to play "catch-up"
Mac Pro 3Ghz, 1GB RAM, ATI Radeon X1900 XT Mac OS X (10.4.8)

[SOLVED] == ERROR: file not found: `/sbin/dmsetup'

[EDIT] A much simpler way to deal with this is to explicitly ignore the kernel update during a full system update:
pacman -Syu --ignore linux
Then explicitly update the kernel alone:
pacman -S linux
[EDIT] First, after a full system update I had to move the STUB kernel image from the UEFI directory back to /boot, them recreate the images a second time. The systemd service moved it back to the UEFI directory.
[EDIT] The use of 'mdadm_udev' in HOOKS= also seems to be no longer just 'preferred' to the 'mdadm' hook but instead is now mandatory.
I've read the news item...
Changes to LVM
2013-02-12 - Thomas Bächler
With lvm2 2.02.98-3, we now utilize lvmetad to activate LVM volumes automatically. This implies the following changes:
The lvm2 initramfs hook now requires the udev hook.
The use_lvmetad = 1 must be set in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf. This is the default now - if you have a lvm.conf.pacnew file, you must merge this change.
You can restrict the volumes that are activated automatically by setting the auto_activation_volume_list in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf. If in doubt, leave this option commented out.
If you need monitoring (needed for snapshots), run systemctl enable lvm-monitoring.service.
The lvmwait kernel command line option is no longer needed and has no effect.
If you run pacman -Syu and update device-mapper, linux and lvm2 at the same time, you will get an error message that /sbin/dmsetup is missing. Run mkinitcpio -p linux again after the update to avoid any problems.
...and I do get the message...
==> ERROR: file not found: `/sbin/dmsetup'
...but after a full system update with...
pacman -Syu
...when I execute...
mkinitcpio -p linux
...this is what I get...
Building image from preset: 'default'
/boot/vmlinuz-linux -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux.img
ERROR:specified kernel image does not exist: `/boot/vmlinuz-linux'
Building image from preset: 'fallback'
/boot/vmlinuz-linux -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux-fallback.img -S autodetect
ERROR:specified kernel image does not exist: `/boot/vmlinuz-linux'
So of course if I reboot I get the dreaded 'No volume groups found' message.
I should mention that I use the systemd path and service to move the kennel after it has been updated.
Last edited by KairiTech (2013-04-07 02:45:12)

With lvm2 2.02.98-3, we now utilize lvmetad to activate LVM volumes automatically. This implies the following changes:
The lvm2 initramfs hook now requires the udev hook.
The use_lvmetad = 1 must be set in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf. This is the default now - if you have a lvm.conf.pacnew file, you must merge this change.
You can restrict the volumes that are activated automatically by setting the auto_activation_volume_list in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf. If in doubt, leave this option commented out.
If you need monitoring (needed for snapshots), run systemctl enable lvm-monitoring.service.
The lvmwait kernel command line option is no longer needed and has no effect.
Just to confirm. You did all these steps, right?
EDIT: I just noticed something:
KairiTech wrote:HOOKS="base udev autodetect sata mdadm usbinput keymap encrypt lvm2 filesystems timestamp shutdown"
Replace
mdadm
with
mdadm_udev
. Maybe this is nothing, but it is recommended to use this one instead of the other.
NEW EDIT: Expecially this one
The use_lvmetad = 1 must be set in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf. This is the default now - if you have a lvm.conf.pacnew file, you must merge this change.
Last edited by s1ln7m4s7r (2013-03-24 20:42:55)

Error File not Found in CS 5.5

When I go to open up PP CS 5.5 it provides a list of possible projects I can open up. Click on a project and it opens accordingly. However, over the past 2 days it has become problematic. I can click on the listed project but I now receive an error message: Error file not found. PP will not open up. I haven't moved any files, folders or projects around. I have simply closed the project, quit PP and then opened it again when wanting to edit. I have tried opening up the auto saved project file and I receive the same message?

Hi Todd both your solutions (and the one suggested by Colin) works initially. Dbl click the project file and it opens PPro. However, I tried this on another project which has a 3rd party pllugin (Smartsound Sonic Fire Pro) in it. Things get interesting with Smartsound being activated with me unable to quit out of it and I am not able to access Premier Pro. I have to Force Quit both programs. Then when I try to dbl click on the program that opened up OK the error message returns: File format not supported. There is no Smartsound file involved in this project? Same thread? New thread? many thanks for your responses

[solved] 'ERROR: file not found:' when running 'mkinitcpio -p linux'

$ sudo mkinitcpio -p linux
==> Building image from preset: /etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux.preset: 'default'
-> -k /boot/vmlinuz-linux -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux.img
==> Starting build: 3.13.5-1-ARCH
-> Running build hook: [systemd]
==> ERROR: file not found: `'
==> ERROR: file not found: `'
==> ERROR: file not found: `'
==> ERROR: file not found: `'
==> ERROR: file not found: `'
==> ERROR: file not found: `'
-> Running build hook: [autodetect]
-> Running build hook: [modconf]
-> Running build hook: [block]
-> Running build hook: [filesystems]
-> Running build hook: [keyboard]
-> Running build hook: [fsck]
-> Running build hook: [consolefont]
-> Running build hook: [keymap]
==> Generating module dependencies
==> Creating cat initcpio image: /boot/initramfs-linux.img
==> WARNING: errors were encountered during the build. The image may not be complete.
==> Building image from preset: /etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux.preset: 'fallback'
-> -k /boot/vmlinuz-linux -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux-fallback.img -S autodetect
==> Starting build: 3.13.5-1-ARCH
-> Running build hook: [systemd]
==> ERROR: file not found: `'
==> ERROR: file not found: `'
==> ERROR: file not found: `'
==> ERROR: file not found: `'
==> ERROR: file not found: `'
==> ERROR: file not found: `'
-> Running build hook: [modconf]
-> Running build hook: [block]
==> WARNING: Possibly missing firmware for module: aic94xx
==> WARNING: Possibly missing firmware for module: smsmdtv
-> Running build hook: [filesystems]
-> Running build hook: [keyboard]
-> Running build hook: [fsck]
-> Running build hook: [consolefont]
-> Running build hook: [keymap]
==> Generating module dependencies
==> Creating cat initcpio image: /boot/initramfs-linux-fallback.img
==> WARNING: errors were encountered during the build. The image may not be complete.
Things seems to work, but I'm a bit worried.
It has just started. PS/2 atkbd stuff went fine.
journalctl shows
Feb 26 22:36:09 localhost systemd-udevd[62]: failed to execute '/usr/lib/udev/ata_id' 'ata_id --export /de
Feb 26 22:36:09 localhost systemd-udevd[63]: failed to execute '/usr/lib/udev/scsi_id' 'scsi_id --export -
Feb 26 22:36:09 localhost systemd-udevd[64]: failed to execute '/usr/lib/udev/ata_id' 'ata_id --export /de
Feb 26 22:36:09 localhost systemd-udevd[65]: failed to execute '/usr/lib/udev/scsi_id' 'scsi_id --export -
Feb 26 22:36:09 localhost kernel: sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4
Feb 26 22:36:09 localhost kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
Feb 26 22:36:09 localhost systemd-udevd[66]: failed to execute '/usr/lib/udev/ata_id' 'ata_id --export /de
Feb 26 22:36:09 localhost systemd-udevd[67]: failed to execute '/usr/lib/udev/scsi_id' 'scsi_id --export
I'm using [testing] but I don't know if it matters.
What should I post?
Last edited by karol (2014-03-15 15:03:56)

The systemd build hook looks like this:
build() {
local rules unit
# from base
add_binary /bin/mount
add_binary /usr/bin/kmod /usr/bin/modprobe
# systemd
add_binary /usr/lib/systemd/systemd /init
add_binary /usr/bin/systemd-tmpfiles
# generate sysroot.mount and sysroot-usr.mount
add_file "/usr/lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-fstab-generator"
# udev rules and systemd units
map add_udev_rule "$rules" \
50-udev-default.rules \
60-persistent-storage.rules \
64-btrfs.rules \
80-drivers.rules \
99-systemd.rules \
map add_systemd_unit \
ctrl-alt-del.target \
initrd-cleanup.service \
initrd-fs.target \
initrd-parse-etc.service \
initrd-root-fs.target \
initrd-switch-root.service \
initrd-switch-root.target \
initrd-udevadm-cleanup-db.service \
initrd.target \
kmod-static-nodes.service \
sockets.target \
[email protected] \
systemd-journald.service \
systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev.service \
systemd-udev-trigger.service \
systemd-udevd-control.socket \
systemd-udevd-kernel.socket \
systemd-udevd.service
add_symlink "/usr/lib/systemd/system/default.target" "initrd.target"
# libdbus needs the passwd info of the root user
# TODO: make sure this is no longer necessary when systemctl moves to sd-bus
add_file "/etc/nsswitch.conf"
add_file "/etc/passwd"
add_binary "$(readlink -f /usr/lib/libnss_files.so)"
# udev wants /etc/group since it doesn't launch with --resolve-names=never
add_file "/etc/group"
Do all of those files exist on your sytemd? I'm not running testing nor systemd in my initrd, so I can't do much checking.
Edit: You're not the only one. Bug report: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/39059
Last edited by Scimmia (2014-02-27 06:59:55)

Error: file not found

Hello,
I am using a labview program which already exists. The program
inputs a file ( txt file with some numerical data) and gives the output
file at the required location after performing some calculations to it.
The problem is when I input my file path and run the program it always
gives an error ' file not found'. Please help me.
Thanks
Laxmikanth

Hi Laxmikanth,
Some more info would be helpful. Such as posting a image of your program, which version of labview, platform etc.
that being said if you are literally typing in the filepath that is the most likely source for the error. Is there a browse button visible to the right of the filepath control? If not try right clicking and under the visible menu make sure the browse button is selected. Then click on the browse button and find/select your disk file. Now run the program and see if you get the same error.
Cheers,
--Russ

RAR Error- Approver not found

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for