Rating system odd problem

Hi,
I've created a enterprise wiki and the page rating does not display correctly. Instead of displaying stars as a graphic it shows text saying
'click to apply your rating as 1 star, click to apply your rating as 2 stars...etc"
The rating system works and displays on things like blog posts etc.
Any help is appreciated!

The Solution is with the X_UA-Compatible. You can adding the tag in the masterpage:
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=9" />
Not optimal but this is the solution, see on
http://blog.lekman.com/2013/01/ie10-fails-to-render-ratings-in.html

Similar Messages

How do I use the rating system for multiple raters?

My wife, her sister, and I are all rating some photos I took a couple of days ago. Each of us, of course, has different favorites.
I would like to record our different ratings in the LR3 rating system but can't see an immediately obvious way to do so. I thought of using the color labels--different color for each of us. But each photo will only take one color label. I could use the star ratings, one star for only one selection, two for two, etc. But that would not record who chose which. I need to know that.
Has anyone had the same problem? If so, is there some rather obvious solution? I would think that it's not all that unusual for several folk to participate in a shoot, using one camera; and then to need some way to record their differing judgments on the photos in LR3.
Any thoughts would be helpful. Thanks in advance,
John Kendrick

The rating system in LR3 is not really designed with that type of functionality in mind. The "target Lightroom user" is an individual that uses LR to create a catalog of photographs which can be graded with a star rating based upon their opinion of the photograph. The concept of seperate star ratings for multiple users doesn't really fit into that concept. LR3, in general, is designed with a single photographer in mind... one that essentially uses the program by his/herself... so it has a bare minimum of 'group' functionality.
It may be possible to find a plug-in that will enable star ratings by multiple users, but I've never heard of one before.
If you really, really need this type of functionality (i.e. saving star ratings by multiple people), the only way to do it that I could think of would be to create multiple collections of the same shoot, each of which is filled with virtual copies of the original photos. Each collection could hypothetically be called '08-03-2010 Bill Ratings'...'08-03-2010 Jill Ratings'... etc... etc. Admittedly, such a workaround may very well be more trouble than its worth... that's just the only way I can think of that you might come close to achieving the functionality you're after.
***EDIT: You beat me to it (VC idea) while I was typing this reply, Ian... wasn't trying to post redundant info...

Odd problems with reading DVD media [concluded]

There is an odd problem I've encountered...(I'm not sure if its a bug with Arch Linux or Linux in general).
Firstly, the details:
* I've updated the systems (using "extra", "current", and "community" respositories). So its the current one (0.80 "Voodoo"). I'm NOT using "Unstable" respository.
* I've already added the user to the "optical" and "storage" groups. So there's no problems in relations to permissions.
* My fstab entries for the CD and DVD drives are default (I didn't touch them)...That is, "iso9660" and "udf" respectively.
* My desktop environment is KDE 3.5.5...And I have changed the behaviour of the desktop icons such that DVD media, CD media, and USB devices will have an icon pop-up as soon as you plug them in.
* I have "hal" loaded in the DAEMONS of /etc/rc.conf
* I'm using 4 different Linux systems with the following DVD burners.
=> Pioneer DVR-108
=> Sony DW-Q120A
=> Hitachi-LG GCC-4240N (DVD-ROM/CD-burner combo)
* There are three Sempron 2800+ (Socket 754, 1.6Ghz) boxes and the last one is on an IBM R40 ThinkPad, and I know you can't read DVD-R media on that. But it should be able to read DVD+R media without issue.
* Two of the Semprons are running Arch, as well as the ThinkPad. The final Sempron box is running Ubuntu 6.06.1
* When I installed K3b I did: pacman -S k3b dvd+rw-tools
* All the DVD media is Verbatim DataLifePlus ones.
Here's what I've done...
I've burnt two DVD media (they're just video files from last year's Blender 2006 conference thing, so its legal stuff).
One is a DVD+R and the other is DVD-R media. Both were done on a Windows 2000 Pro SP4 box using Nero 6.6.1.4
What's the problem?
Well, KDE in the Arch Linux boxes doesn't recognise the media!...There is no DVD icon that automatically pops up on any of the Arch Linux boxes!
When I run dmesg on the Arch boxes, the only relevant info I get is:
ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 3
ISOFS: changing to secondary root
Now if I re-insert these DVD media onto an Ubuntu 6.06.1 LTS box...The DVD+R works perfectly! While the DVD-R does not.
When I run dmesg on this box, I get the following:
[17179654.808000] hdc: cdrom_decode_status: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplet e Error }
[17179654.808000] hdc: cdrom_decode_status: error=0x40 { LastFailedSense=0x04 }
[17179654.808000] ide: failed opcode was: unknown
[17179654.808000] hdc: cdrom_decode_status: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplet e Error }
[17179654.808000] hdc: cdrom_decode_status: error=0x40 { LastFailedSense=0x04 }
[17179654.808000] ide: failed opcode was: unknown
[17179654.808000] hdc: cdrom_decode_status: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplet e Error }
[17179654.808000] hdc: cdrom_decode_status: error=0x40 { LastFailedSense=0x04 }
[17179654.808000] ide: failed opcode was: unknown
[17179654.812000] hdc: cdrom_decode_status: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplet e Error }
[17179654.812000] hdc: cdrom_decode_status: error=0x40 { LastFailedSense=0x04 }
[17179654.812000] ide: failed opcode was: unknown
[17179654.812000] hdc: DMA disabled
[17179654.812000] hdc: ide_intr: huh? expected NULL handler on exit
[17179654.860000] hdc: ATAPI reset complete
[17179655.364000] ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 3
[17179655.412000] ISOFS: changing to secondary root
[17179725.140000] Unable to identify CD-ROM format.
[17179729.348000] Unable to identify CD-ROM format.
[17181395.032000] ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 3
[17181395.032000] ISOFS: changing to secondary root
If I re-burn the data onto a DVD+RW, Arch and Ubuntu immediately sees it, and KDE (or Gnome in Ubuntu), will have a DVD icon popping up! I can view the video clips without issue!
Now here's the really odd part...
When I load up K3b on either Arch OR Ubuntu, they recognise all DVD media! (As in, they can read the media disc information!)...Tools => DiskInfo
If I click on the PIONEER - DVD-RW DVR-108 on the tree menu on the left side in K3b, (to view the contents of the DVD-R or DVD+R media), it can't read and pops up an error message informing about a read problem. It suggests I try dmesg|tail to see what's wrong.
When I do that, I get...
# dmesg|tail
grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block 18446744073708569376 for device hdc
UDF-fs: No partition found (1)
grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block 18446744073708569376 for device hdc
UDF-fs: No partition found (1)
grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block 18446744073708569376 for device hdc
UDF-fs: No partition found (1)
grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block 18446744073708569376 for device hdc
UDF-fs: No partition found (1)
grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block 18446744073708569376 for device hdc
UDF-fs: No partition found (1)
I repeat the same procedure on DVD+RW, and it works perfectly!
Should I use another burning application instead of Nero on the Windows box?
Could it be the way I burn things?
(Some DVD+R and DVD-R are burnt with multisession while others aren't.)
Has anyone else experienced similar issues?
What are your "workarounds" or fixes?

It *should* work...But they don't.
I tried this...
mount -t auto /dev/dvd /mnt/dvd
I get this...
mount: block device /dev/dvd is write-protected, mounting read-only
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/dvd,
missing codepage or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so
I then do dmesg|tail
grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block 18446744073708569376 for device hdc
UDF-fs: No partition found (1)
If I try this...
mount -t iso9660 /dev/dvd /mnt/dvd
I get this...
mount: block device /dev/dvd is write-protected, mounting read-only
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/dvd,
missing codepage or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so
I then do dmesg|tail
Unable to identify CD-ROM format.
If I stick in a DVD-R that is burnt in one go without multisession, I get this in the dmesg
UDF-fs: Partition marked readonly; forcing readonly mount
UDF-fs INFO UDF 0.9.8.1 (2004/29/09) Mounting volume 'SW', timestamp 2006/11/07 19:37 (1000)
It reads this disc perfectly and KDE pops up a DVD icon.
I'm scratching my head as I'm not sure what is the problem.
Could it be hal or the way the DVD media was formatted?

Using Aperture's star rating system

Forum member mrhooper posted [something in another thread|http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=13357908#13357908] which caught my eye. I didn't have time to respond, and now that thread is marked answered -- and my reply is slightly off-topic -- so I started this new thread in the hopes of learning how better to use the star rankings in Aperture.
Below is +what I do.+ I'm very curious to find out what you do -- or to hear any suggestions for making what I do more sensible.
Here is (part of) mrhooper's comment.
So we are now bringing over everything into Aperture and then rating images on a 1, 2, 4, 5 basis. Come on, if its a 3 make a decision. Everything else is a 9, and then the rejects are deleted. And then the trash is emptied and they are out of the library.
So we bring in the raw and then quickly rate, and I can't image a 400 shoot taking much more than 5 minutes rate.
Go through once for 1, then for 2, by then the 4 is obvious and the 5 we just love anyway. 9 everything else.
Fwiw (always an auspicious start to an Internet posting), I TOTALLY agree re: the wasted gamut of the seven-level rating system (that's rejected-unrated-1-2-3-4-5).
Here's what I've settled on:
• If I look at a picture, I rate it. Reject or save-and-decide-later. That's "9" and "1". So "unrated" is meaningful to me. It doesn't mean "less than rated", and, importantly, it doesn't mean "not-rejected"; it means, literally, not-yet-rated. (The problem solved here occurs when I am part way through tossing rejects from a Project and I am interrupted.)
Immediately after import, I add a Project description, assign a Place, and Stack images taken in burst mode or with any range of exposure settings. When I rate images in a Project, the first thing I do is go through these Stacks and select the most usable image from these minor variations (I need to do this before comparing un-like images in the Project). Within any Stack, I might have rejects ("9") and saves (1-star); the "pick" of the Stack gets a 2-star rating (1-star is already in use).
• 1- and 2-star ratings +have the same value to me as images.+ The only difference is that 2-star images came from Stacks. (Those Stacks may contain 1-star images which for any number of reasons I want to retain even though they are not a Stack pick and will likely never be promoted nor processed nor printed nor published).
Now I can go through my Project and make my picks. I mark images to be developed in RED (I use the 8 color labels to track image development). All of these also get upgraded to 3- or 4-stars.
• 3-star means "keep". The general idea is that in a few years time I will likely want to do some major weeding in my Aperture orchard. Any 1- or 2-star images will then be unceremoniously deleted. 3-star images will be kept.
• 4-star means good enough for publication. One of the best of the Project.
After I develop the images in a Project, I will re-assign the star rankings. During development, some images will be promoted.
• 5-star means not only good enough to be published as one of the best of the Project (and I mean that at whatever level one works -- from emailed to friends to printed for sale), but good enough to be included in some other sampling of my work. (I keep an Album for my Portfolio. The images in the Album are selected from my 5-star images.
Note that in my use, +star ratings are Project specific+. There is no value-equivalence between the star ratings -- and I consciously try to avoid comparisons across Projects. (If I've done a shoot, I need to know which are the usable/salable shots in that shoot -- I don't need to know how they rank in my life's work.) All of the 4-star images in one Project may be of less comparative value to me than the only 4-star image in another Project.
So in my system, "Reject", "3-star", and "4-star" are the only ratings which are necessary. They correspond to the all important distinctions mrhooper indicated:
- throw-out
- keep but don't use
- use.
The other star ratings could -- and from a tidy database standard, should -- be replaced by a metadatum that is not part of the rating gamut.
The orchard floor is yours ...
Message was edited by: Kirby Krieger

Hi Kirby,
Thanks for opening this up, as I suspect most of us have gone through the "let's see that's a 1 or no... probably a 2, perhaps I can clean up the backgound and then it would be 3. " etc etc.
We settled on a similar process where you suggest it is a project by project rating, not our life's work.
So we skip 3, play with 4 and 5, that should be obvious.
1 and 2, they are going to be deleted at some stage in the future, unless it is some rare thing, and that doesn't happen every shoot.
In Jan this year looked at the 2008 year 1, 2 and deleted most of them. Hey, we hadn't used them, touched them, improved them or even thought about them. Goodbye.
Some memorabilia, sentimental value ones got to stay.
When we look for the best, then 5 is the go. Maybe a review of 4's but only if we are struggling in 5s
Which by the way we tend to be fairly generous with I suppose.
Checked a shot of 60 images early in the week, 15 are in the 4 and 5, 8 are 5.
We also use the wonderful color system. Now this sorts out a lot of things for later smart albums.
Here are a few Green-teaching. Red-for web site pages, Blue - the crown jewels, the ones we both love. Purple- spec shots for photo library etc.
Yep, sometimes a shot might be two or more colors, but it is not stopping us at the moment.
We do shoot burst, but don't stack. If its a 4 I want to be able to see it. We create albums in the project Star 4, Star 5, so there they are in a hurry. Yep, know it is easy to do that in the search box, and can use Ctlr1-5, but the clever is later when we can be really specific in search for albums with Star 5, or what ever.
Just to finish off, the 4 and 5 get keywords, lots of them. From event, to person, to specific lighting, to species, or building type or.....
want a pic of a 1937 Ford- in Blue, at the Last Cafe, in Spring, in the sunshine, front lit, side view?
That is what Aperture does.
and because of the way we use projects for each shoot, bet I could find it in about 10 seconds in quick review of the appropriate year or month as well.
This is not the thread on project names, but we have from the beginning way back in iPhoto(5) put them in as a date and description.
Cool thing now in Projects/Full Screen, is I can Filter by the date number so typing in 9012 gets me all the projects only from 2009, December. (9) 0 (12) Oh, am aware of what is going to happen when we have been round the scale once and the numbers come back. And we have a plan.
I am sure there are other ways to start a good system, to use the ratings and the keywords of Aperture, and agree that you have to think project specific when it comes to what is a 5.
Reserving 5 only for the 'very best image you ever took of a rose", is a bit limiting and what if my "Very best waterfall picture' is even better?
Thanks for starting a good ideas discussion.
Regards
DJ

Laptop shuts down at "Now Rating System Performance"

Model number: PSAY3C-04S010
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit)
I attempted to restore the pre-installed software from the recovery hard disk drive.
Everything went smoothly, reached the screen "Configuring System... 71/71".
Then came the screen "Now Rating System Performance".
The bar would load a bit (maybe around 5%) and the laptop suddenly shuts down without warning.
I have tried turning the laptop back on, starting Windows normally, and it would bring me back to those 2 screens, and the laptop would shut down again at "Now Rating System Performance".
I have tried turning the laptop back on 4 or 5 times now, and the result is always the same. The laptop shuts down at that screen.
What should I do?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

I've confirmed the solution after consulting with a few technicians. Huge thanks to them. I'm sharing this here for anyone who might encounter the same problem in the future.
The solution: charge the battery to 100%, then with both the battery fully charged and the AC adaptor plugged in, start the laptop again, and the process should complete without any problems.
What I did wrong was to attempt to do the whole process on AC adaptor alone. I did not use the battery at all. When the performance-rating started, the laptop couldn't draw enough power from the AC adaptor alone, so it shut down automatically. With BOTH the battery and the AC adaptor, the laptop had enough power to finish the entire recovery process.

System Boot problems / Power supply? Antec Neopower.

I've had this system for around 2 weeks now and as I've posted in other threads I have a occasional problem getting past the windows splash screen, if I don't get in the first time if I reset I usually boot in no problem.
It's a very odd problem that is really stumping me.. I kind of think it's raid related? but could if possibly be my power supply? I have a Antec NeoPower 480w which I carried over from my intel system and figured it would be fine?!
But since I've been reading these forums it seems as though the AMD64 systems are quite picky when it comes to the amps issue. Would it be a good idea to replace this power supply or could it possibly be something else? Thanks for any help..

Most likely it is the board.
I have to boot up twice to get a POST everytime my system is cold.
I thought it's my PSU too and went for one of the best: OCZ Powerstream 520W
Still the same problem. My problem isn't that bad since i just have to power on, off on to get it running but it's still showing how bad/bug-ridden this board is.

Premier 7 Odd problem

This may be something someone out there can clue me in on !!! I am capturing from a non digital cam and using another program to capture and then getting the clips from that program into Premier , this part is no problem as long as I save to my PC as soon as I save to my external and try importing to premier , premier tells me it does not recognize the file why is that?? how can I change that?/

Good Day Hunt , happy thanksgiving to all!! I have tried the Gspot and the same codec comes up for both places of storage on my PC it comes as DIB(_RGB And On The Maxtor stirage device it is the same DIB(_RGB also states no codec needed Do Not know waht it all means but I go back to what You said earlier that the external HD is The problem , Is there an external that can handle this or all the same ?? John
From The Home Of JC & M
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 18:50:15 -0600
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Premier 7 Odd problem
OK, you have used the Corel program, so you have a file to test with. Get http://www.headbands.com/gspot and install it. When you open it, give it time to survey your system for properly installed CODEC's. Then, drag one of the Corel files to it, and read the details.
You might be able to get this info right from Corel, though probably not in great detail.
Here's a look at the G-Spot GUI.
http://forums.adobe.com/servlet/JiveServlet/showImage/12983/G-Spot_Screen_02.jpg
Good luck,
Hunt
>

G4 Sawtooth odd problems

I have an older G4 Sawtooth. It has an upgraded processor at 1ghz and 1.3 gig ram. I've upgraded the hard drives with a 60 G and a 120 G drives. There is also a pci ethernet card installed.
I moved recently, and the tower stayed in a box for a few months. I have it up and running, but am now experiencing an odd problem. The drop down menus in all programs other than finder, do not work. I've tried disk utility and Techtool Pro. Disk utility looses contact with the 60G HD I have the operating system on. I didn't have much yet on the 120 G, so I tried to install in that, and there were 'errors.' Techtool will only try to boot, but will never actually load.
I haven't tried resetting PRAM, but I will try. Any other ideas. Help
Thanks

Well, it still has the original battery in the computer, so i will change it today. I don't believe that is the problem though, or only problem.
I installed the OS the other HD and it is working fine. I then tried to run Mac disc utility on the main drive and got the following.
Missing thread record (id = 4871)
Checking multi-linked files.
Checking Catalog hierarchy.
Invalid volume directory count
(It should be 48514 instead of 48515)
Invalid volume file count
(It should be 193965 instead of 193968)
Checking volume bitmap.
Checking volume information.
Repairing volume.
Missing directory record (id = 4871)
The volume Mac HD could not be repaired.
Error: The underlying task reported failure on exit (-9972)
My Techtool Pro CD doesn't seem to want to load. Any ideas?
I didn't remove all the video card, but I did make sure all the connections were secure inside.
Thank you

An odd problem importing footage...ideas please!!

I'm having an odd problem with iMovie that has me stumped so far. I'm currently using a borrowed DVcamcorder to import my footage. So far I can only import footage that was taped using that exact camcorder. I have other footage, (also miniDV format) that was created on a different camera, and it won't import properly. It comes out very jumpy, almost as if the frame rate is off or it's not scanning the fields properly, playing only every other one. The camera also gives me a "clean heads" message that only appears when I try to use the "foreign" video. The heads don't need cleaning, and I've checked the frame rate. Does anyone have any ideas? I'm lost so far!!
I'm using an iMac G5, with iMovie HD.
Thank-you!

Welcome to iMovie Discussions!
It may be that the "foreign" tape (..i.e; not recorded in that camcorder you're using..) was recorded at LP (Long Play) - a slow tape speed - or even slower than LP.
This makes recordings on extremely narrow video tracks (..because the tape hardly moves forwards while the spinning recording head turns round..) which may not quite co-incide with the exact head position of another camcorder ..i.e; the tolerance is too fine to match properly.
Most manufacturers mention this ..in very obscure language.. in their camcorder manuals, saying that LP tapes from other camcorders might not play properly, or tapes recorded in LP mode might not play in other camcorders.
Most (all?) Sony DV camcorders will play back footage recorded faster than normal, on 'professional' 'DVCAM' recorders. These tapes move faster through the camera than ordinary DV, so they produce a wider track which is less likely to cause signal 'drop-out' failure. I don't know if other makes of camcorder can play back DVCAM material.
If the "foreign" tapes were shot at DVCAM speed (..e.g; on a Sony PDX10 camcorder, or similar), then although they should play back in other, normal 'domestic' Sony cams, they might not play back in another make of camcorder. Could these be DVCAM tapes?
Finally, it might also be that the "foreign" tape really is a Foreign tape: i.e; the recording was made to a different standard. So if it's an American-recorded (NTSC) tape and it's played in a UK (PAL TV system) camcorder, the frame-rate will be wrong, the number of scan-lines will be wrong, the colour info will be wrong, etc. [..But as you mention "fields", you probably know enough not to have made that mistake.]
NOTE: Ooops, sorry, Karl: we must have both been typing at the same time ..didn't mean to step on your toes.

Odd Problem With MDT 2012 Deployment

Disclaimer: I'm an MDT n00b and barely know how to do anything other than the basics.
The odd problem: Computers that I deploy Windows 7 to using MDT will NOT (after deployement is complete) pass credentials to our proxy (Smoothwall - NTLM Authentication) and cannot not access the internet. It doesn't matter the flavor of Windows
7: 32bit/64bit or Pro/Ultimate same result. Does this on an unpatched machine with only IE8 or a fully patched machine with IE9. I've diddled all the security and connection settings in IE that I know to diddle with the same result. And it's not
just an IE problem. It does it with Firefox, too. Now getting to intranet sites is no problem... this is strictly an internet proxy authentication issue.
Now... why am I asking the MDT forum about this? Because I can load Windows 7 the old fashioned way with a DVD made from the same ISO that I used when setting up MDT and it works fine.
So MDT must be doing something differently when deploying Win 7. As a side note, when I deploy Windows 8 using MDT we do not have this issue. Maybe Microsoft just wants me to upgrade? :)
Everything else about the computer seems quite normal. No undetected drivers. Windows activates normally. I can join the domain either during or after the process. Install applications automatically. I mean the whole MDT process
seems to be working great otherwise.
Help? Please?

Yes, I found a way to undo this in my environment without needing to reimage all of the computers.
There are two problems:
1. GP items in the Administrative Template were modified.
2. GP items in the Security section were modified.
Problem 1
To address problem #1 delete the folder "%SystemRoot%\System32\GroupPolicy":
rd /s /q "%SystemRoot%\System32\GroupPolicy"
Problem 2
To address problem #2, it gets a little more complicated since there is no easy way to "revert" to the default in Win7. The only workaround is to import new settings. To accomplish this, I ran the following from a FRESHLY installed non-domain
joined computer that did not have the local GPO pack applied:
secedit /export /cfg secConf.inf
Then on the "bad" system that had the local GPO applied, I ran:
secedit /configure /db secedit.sdb /cfg secConf.inf /overwrite /quiet
I also found that I needed to delete the following keys since they did not exist on my safe/good image:
reg delete "HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System" /v "DisableCAD" /f
reg delete "HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa" /v "LmCompatibilityLevel" /f
reg delete "HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa" /v "SCENoApplyLegacyAuditPolicy" /f
And for some reason (and this was not consistent), I also found that I needed to delete the following on some systems:
reg delete "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate\AU" /f
Full Solution
Here is everything I ran against my "bad" systems that were domain joined in production use:
Batch File
rd /s /q "%SystemRoot%\System32\GroupPolicy"
secedit /configure /db secedit.sdb /cfg "%~dp0SecurityPolicies-Defaults.inf" /overwrite /quiet
reg delete "HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System" /v "DisableCAD" /f
reg delete "HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa" /v "LmCompatibilityLevel" /f
reg delete "HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa" /v "SCENoApplyLegacyAuditPolicy" /f
reg delete "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate\AU" /f
SecurityPolicies-Defaults.inf
[Unicode]
Unicode=yes
[System Access]
MinimumPasswordAge = 0
MaximumPasswordAge = 42
MinimumPasswordLength = 0
PasswordComplexity = 0
PasswordHistorySize = 0
LockoutBadCount = 0
RequireLogonToChangePassword = 0
ForceLogoffWhenHourExpire = 0
NewAdministratorName = "Administrator"
NewGuestName = "Guest"
ClearTextPassword = 0
LSAAnonymousNameLookup = 0
EnableAdminAccount = 1
EnableGuestAccount = 0
[Event Audit]
AuditSystemEvents = 0
AuditLogonEvents = 0
AuditObjectAccess = 0
AuditPrivilegeUse = 0
AuditPolicyChange = 0
AuditAccountManage = 0
AuditProcessTracking = 0
AuditDSAccess = 0
AuditAccountLogon = 0
[Registry Values]
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Setup\RecoveryConsole\SecurityLevel=4,0
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Setup\RecoveryConsole\SetCommand=4,0
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\CachedLogonsCount=1,"10"
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\ForceUnlockLogon=4,0
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\PasswordExpiryWarning=4,5
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\ScRemoveOption=1,"0"
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\ConsentPromptBehaviorAdmin=4,5
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\ConsentPromptBehaviorUser=4,3
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\DontDisplayLastUserName=4,0
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\EnableInstallerDetection=4,1
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\EnableLUA=4,1
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\EnableSecureUIAPaths=4,1
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\EnableUIADesktopToggle=4,0
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\EnableVirtualization=4,1
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\FilterAdministratorToken=4,0
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\LegalNoticeCaption=1,""
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\LegalNoticeText=7,
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\PromptOnSecureDesktop=4,1
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\ScForceOption=4,0
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\ShutdownWithoutLogon=4,1
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\UndockWithoutLogon=4,1
MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\ValidateAdminCodeSignatures=4,0
MACHINE\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Safer\CodeIdentifiers\AuthenticodeEnabled=4,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\AuditBaseObjects=4,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\CrashOnAuditFail=4,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\DisableDomainCreds=4,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\EveryoneIncludesAnonymous=4,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\FIPSAlgorithmPolicy\Enabled=4,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\ForceGuest=4,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\FullPrivilegeAuditing=3,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\LimitBlankPasswordUse=4,1
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\MSV1_0\NTLMMinClientSec=4,536870912
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\MSV1_0\NTLMMinServerSec=4,536870912
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\NoLMHash=4,1
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\RestrictAnonymous=4,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\RestrictAnonymousSAM=4,1
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Print\Providers\LanMan Print Services\Servers\AddPrinterDrivers=4,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurePipeServers\Winreg\AllowedExactPaths\Machine=7,System\CurrentControlSet\Control\ProductOptions,System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Server Applications,Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurePipeServers\Winreg\AllowedPaths\Machine=7,System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Print\Printers,System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Eventlog,Software\Microsoft\OLAP Server,Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Print,Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows,System\CurrentControlSet\Control\ContentIndex,System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server,System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server\UserConfig,System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server\DefaultUserConfiguration,Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Perflib,System\CurrentControlSet\Services\SysmonLog
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Kernel\ObCaseInsensitive=4,1
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management\ClearPageFileAtShutdown=4,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\ProtectionMode=4,1
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\SubSystems\optional=7,Posix
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanManServer\Parameters\AutoDisconnect=4,15
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanManServer\Parameters\EnableForcedLogOff=4,1
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanManServer\Parameters\EnableSecuritySignature=4,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanManServer\Parameters\NullSessionPipes=7,
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanManServer\Parameters\RequireSecuritySignature=4,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanManServer\Parameters\RestrictNullSessAccess=4,1
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters\EnablePlainTextPassword=4,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters\EnableSecuritySignature=4,1
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters\RequireSecuritySignature=4,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LDAP\LDAPClientIntegrity=4,1
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters\DisablePasswordChange=4,0
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters\MaximumPasswordAge=4,30
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters\RequireSignOrSeal=4,1
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters\RequireStrongKey=4,1
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters\SealSecureChannel=4,1
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters\SignSecureChannel=4,1
[Privilege Rights]
SeNetworkLogonRight = *S-1-1-0,*S-1-5-32-544,*S-1-5-32-545,*S-1-5-32-551
SeBackupPrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544,*S-1-5-32-551
SeChangeNotifyPrivilege = *S-1-1-0,*S-1-5-19,*S-1-5-20,*S-1-5-32-544,*S-1-5-32-545,*S-1-5-32-551
SeSystemtimePrivilege = *S-1-5-19,*S-1-5-32-544
SeCreatePagefilePrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544
SeDebugPrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544
SeRemoteShutdownPrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544
SeAuditPrivilege = *S-1-5-19,*S-1-5-20
SeIncreaseQuotaPrivilege = *S-1-5-19,*S-1-5-20,*S-1-5-32-544
SeIncreaseBasePriorityPrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544
SeLoadDriverPrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544
SeBatchLogonRight = *S-1-5-32-544,*S-1-5-32-551,*S-1-5-32-559
SeServiceLogonRight = *S-1-5-80-0
SeInteractiveLogonRight = Guest,*S-1-5-32-544,*S-1-5-32-545,*S-1-5-32-551
SeSecurityPrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544
SeSystemEnvironmentPrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544
SeProfileSingleProcessPrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544
SeSystemProfilePrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544,*S-1-5-80-3139157870-2983391045-3678747466-658725712-1809340420
SeAssignPrimaryTokenPrivilege = *S-1-5-19,*S-1-5-20
SeRestorePrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544,*S-1-5-32-551
SeShutdownPrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544,*S-1-5-32-545,*S-1-5-32-551
SeTakeOwnershipPrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544
SeDenyNetworkLogonRight = Guest
SeDenyBatchLogonRight =
SeDenyInteractiveLogonRight = Guest
SeUndockPrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544,*S-1-5-32-545
SeManageVolumePrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544
SeRemoteInteractiveLogonRight = *S-1-5-32-544,*S-1-5-32-555
SeImpersonatePrivilege = *S-1-5-19,*S-1-5-20,*S-1-5-32-544,*S-1-5-6
SeCreateGlobalPrivilege = *S-1-5-19,*S-1-5-20,*S-1-5-32-544,*S-1-5-6
SeIncreaseWorkingSetPrivilege = *S-1-5-32-545
SeTimeZonePrivilege = *S-1-5-19,*S-1-5-32-544,*S-1-5-32-545
SeCreateSymbolicLinkPrivilege = *S-1-5-32-544
[Version]
signature="$CHICAGO$"
Revision=1
Thanks to Darren Mar-Elia for leading me in the right direction with this.
Good luck!

Rating System Change

Due to the request of many of our community users, (see this thread) I have taken an intermediate step towards solving our ratings problem
in the community. Now, only relatively established users with 50 or
more posts will be able to rate messages. In my experience, the vast
majority of 1 star ratings come from users new to the community. We do not intend for any message rating to be negative, however, due to the nature of the 1 to 5 star system, anything less than 5 stars can be interpreted as an insult.
I realize this does not fix the problem. There are currently no other
feasible options available for the rating system. I do know that at
some point in the future, our forum vendor will release new rating
system options to us. At that point, I will start a discussion about
which of the options is best for our community. Unfortunately, I do
not have an idea of their timeline currently. I hope to be able to
give an update on when we might expect new options soon.
Regards,
Laura
Web Support and Operations
National Instruments
Message Edited by Laura F. on 09-14-2007 05:01 PM

Let the proclaimation ring throughout the land!
This sounds like a wonderful solution and seems to be yet another way that NI listens to the community.
Matt Holt
Certified LabVIEW Architect

Troubleshooting System Recovery Problems

A System Recovery is a useful tool to return your Windows 8 tablet back to factory defaults. However, what do you do when the System Recovery isn't working!?
A full System Recovery can be a lengthy process as there is a lot of data being transferred. Patience is the key, as a full Recovery can take two to four hours to complete.
For more information check out HP's Troubleshooting HP System Recovery Problems for Windows 8. This document will help you get your Windows 8 tablet back up and running.
TIP: If you are planning on using the System Recovery make sure that you do not change or delete the HP Recovery Partition as that will make all but impossible to Restore your tablet using the HP Recovery Manager.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
Thank you,
BHK6
I work on behalf of HP

Have you created this disc on your own or you use original toshiba disc?
Do you use it for the first time?

Is the rating system really necessary?

I know... I know... I'm probably getting on a touchy subject here.
I understand the desire for a sort of incentive for people to answer questions but it is my observation that use of points is hardly consistent. For the most part, it seems like questions from established users tend to get helpful and solved answers most of the time. Great. The point system works in that instance.
I have also noticed that I will see someone come on the boards, post a question, get their answer and never post again. They either don't know about the rating system or they do not stay long enough to use it.
Does that mean I need to look at the O.P.'s post count before I post an answer? I think that's shallow. If someone has question and I think I know a solution, then I will post a solution.
But what is the solution? Do away with the rating system? I think some upper-level members would have a justifiable objection to that. Change it to a raw post count? I suspect we would see an even higher number of posts deleted because of people trying to pad their numbers.
What if members received 1 point for marking an answer as helpful and 2 points for marking an answer as solved?
Its a thought.

No, the rating (reputation) system isn't really necessary, but it does serve as an incentive for many people to increase their participation, and increased participation lends itself to the perception of increased value in this Apple-provided service, if not to the usefulness of the bulk of the posts that are left here.
Ultimately, there are a lot of things that go into the decision to attach a reputation system of one kind or another to Discussions, and there has been one such system or another in place here for many years, so there is no reason to believe that the concept will ever be abandoned.
As to the idea that upper-level members would object to its loss, yes, some would. Maybe many. On the other hand, there are quite a few of us who see through this charade and do what we can do undermine its importance relative to the real mission of Apple's Discussions. In the end, I'd like to think that our cynicism helps to balance out the "shallowness" of post-count building and points-grubbing strategies that seem to obsess many of our peers.
What if members received 1 point for marking an answer as helpful and 2 points for marking an answer as solved?
I've suggested this myself in the past, but one of the roadblocks to its implementation is that the current software is only able to mete out points in increments of 5. Oh well....
Good luck!

Vendor rating system?

Dear Gurus,
how do we plan for a vendor rating system and move about?
Thanks..

Hi
There are several point , firstly whether the vendor is ISO
certified or TS certified , vendor assessment , rejection
trend analysis in a month, debit trend analysis in a
month,On time delivery analysis , dependence on local
transport, Documentations maintained, Yearly discounts on
bulk quantity orders etc.
A chart is prepared for all these activities in horizontals
and in verticals the vendors names are written and then the
rating is done on a 6 point scale or 1 point scale.
Regards
Anjali

Rating system

Hi, I am implementing the rating system in the application
where the user chose the rating from the fiveoptions of 1,2,3,4,5
and then submit, the rating field holds the value of the submited
value, when i try to rate again, it picks the current value and
store n the database,
i want to show like that if 3 users rated the article, the
rating should be shown as the average of three voters.
Well i tries to use theevaluate funcion but that didnot
worked the wayi want.
I want theway like storing the voting in a temp table and
then evaluating the value of temp vote field and then show on the
web.
can anyone know how to implement her. this idea
Thanks for ur advance help., if any

You need two columns in your database - "count" which is
incremented by one each time someone rates, and "total" which
contains the total of all ratings. To calculate the average of the
ratings, do <CFSET average = total / count>. You can round
the average to any number of decimal points you want.
Do you intend to prevent someone from rating multiple
times?

Rating system odd problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for