Rational Rose 4 and '98 users

If you are using Rational with Forte would you please contact me.
Thanks
-jim
Jim Rice mailto:[email protected]
Forte Software, Inc. http://www.forte.com
National Tech Services Work#: 301-721-1910
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

1. To run JDeveloper use jdk1.3 but you can use it to develop applications with jdk1.4
2. You can use Oracle9i JDeveloper with Oracle8i.
3. Oracle9i will probably work, but rational might not be able to take advantage of the latest features of the database. Check out the UML capabilities of JDeveloepr.

Similar Messages

  • Rational rose and LabVIEW

    I'm in the preliminary design stage of a task and I'm debating whether to use Object-Oriented design or Structured Analysis.  I'm using LabVIEW with TestStand to control/test quite a bit of hardware (test equipment, I/O cards, VME, VXI, GPIB, ethernet, etc).  The UML tool I have available is Rational Rose.  Any thoughts/guidance?

    Hi MrBean,
        Although I'm no expert in the different design
    paradigms, and in particular with relationship to Rational Rose (which
    I have limited experience with), I would most likely recommend
    Structured Analysis over Object-Oriented based mainly on the fact that,
    at present, LabVIEW is not an Object Oriented programming language.
    Structured Analysis provides more of a "how and in what order are
    things done" viewpoint (with its Functional, Data, and Dynamic
    viewpoints), and seems like a well suited design method for use with
    LabVIEW and TestStand.
    Hope those thoughts help MrBean, have a great weekend!
    Dan Weiland - Applications Engineer - National Instruments
    Dan Weiland

  • Re: Rational Rose and Forté

    Have a look at this:
    http://www.rational.com/news_events/press/dynamic.jtmpl?doc_key=100920
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

    http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=1090&context=SSBR5D&context=SSBR7N&context=SSBRDT&context=SSSGYQ&context=SSMMQY&context=SSSGSH&context=SSSGV8&context=SSSGW8&context=SSSGX3&context=SSSGXW&context=SSMMS4&context=SSSH27&context=SSBQNN&context=SSBQS8&context=SSUL78&context=SSBR9L&context=SSSH32&context=SSSH3S&context=SSNJU5&context=SSSH4K&context=SSBRB9&context=SSSH5A&context=SSUTY2&context=SSNJQS&context=SSJMXE&context=SSCM5S&context=SSBQTS&context=SSMMM5&context=SS6M8Z&context=SS6MB7&context=SSBQW4&context=SSBQXM&context=SSCM57&context=SSSH6V&context=SSSH89&context=SSSH8W&context=SSSH9N&context=SSSHAD&context=SSSHAZ&context=SSSHBU&context=SSSHCT&context=SSSHDX&context=SSSHHF&context=SSJPA5&context=SSSHEM&context=SSSHFC&context=SSSHG2&context=SSSHGQ&context=SSSHJ8&context=SSSHJY&context=SSSHKL&context=SSJPCD&context=SSSHL7&context=SSMML4&context=SSMMHM&context=SSYSCM&context=SSBRGQ&context=SSSHLQ&context=SSCM72&context=SSJPDP&context=SSSHMK&context=SSSHN6&context=SSSHNT&context=SSSHPH&context=SSSHRJ&context=SSMMF4&context=SSSHSK&context=SSSHT4&context=SSSHTR&context=SSBQZT&context=SSSHUF&context=SSSHVH&context=SSSHVY&context=SSSHWL&context=SSSHXB&context=SSBR3M&context=SSSHXU&context=SSSHZ9&context=SSSHYJ&context=SSSJ2Z&context=SSSJ2D&context=SSSHZT&dc=DB510&dc=DB520&dc=D800&dc=D900&dc=DA900&dc=DA800&dc=DB530&dc=DA600&dc=DB550&dc=D100&dc=D600&dc=D700&dc=DA500&dc=D200&dc=DA430&dc=DA440&dc=DA410&dc=DA450&dc=DA420&dc=DA460&dc=DB300&dc=DA470&dc=DA480&dc=DB100&dc=DA4A10&dc=DA4A20&dc=DA700&dc=DA4A30&q1=java+5&uid=swg21192033&loc=en_US&cs=UTF-8&lang=en
    URL to rose website indicating that rose does not support JRE 1.5 :(

  • Re: Rational Rose product and Forte

    We use Forte 3.0 with Rational Rose 4.0 since more than one year on a
    medium size project (10 developers). I have not tried Rose98 with Forte,
    so what I have to say may or may not apply to Rose98.
    In general I am very satisfied with the Forte support of Rose. The code
    generation facilities are sophisticated. For example from one attribute
    in Rose you can generate a virtual attribute and the corresponding get
    and set methods which implement the virtual attribute. You can even
    change the naming conventions (how to generate the name of get and set
    methods). You can also model all components of a Forte application like
    interfaces, events, eventhandlers, constants, domain types etc.
    Since access to the Forte repository is difficult, Rose does not read
    from or write to the repository. Instead you must export a plan as a
    .pex file, regenerate the plan from Rose and reimport the generated file
    into Forte. Rose correctly preserves the code that you have written as
    well as other information like GUI layout etc. Nevertheless this process
    is a bit tedious and prone to errors.
    Rose can import a Forte .pex and produce a model from it ("reverse
    engineering"). This works O.K. but I use it only on small prototypes
    that I developed in Forte to get a "first cut" of a model. The analyzer
    has only a few global options (for example whether you want to model
    object-valued attributes as associations or as attributes). In addition
    it names all attribute types and method parameters with fully qualified
    class names so that your methods tend to have very long signatures like
    Add(input source:Framework.IntegerData):Framework.IntegerData
    instead of
    Add(source:IntegerData):IntegerData
    On the other hand Rose generates correct Forte code if you use the short
    form in your model. So I use Rose mainly for forward generation.
    I find the combination of Rose with Forte very valuable, mostly because
    Forte does not allow a convenient documentation of plans, classes and
    attributes.
    If you have additional questions, I will be happy to answer them.
    Robinson, Richard wrote:
    >
    Has anyone used Rational Rose products and Forte? Could you post a short
    summary that explains how easy/hard it is to work with and whether or not
    the reverse engineering features work well?
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>--
    Dr. Thomas Kunst mailto:[email protected]
    sd&m GmbH & Co. KG http://www.sdm.de
    software design & management
    Thomas-Dehler-Str. 27, 81737 Muenchen, Germany
    Tel +49 89 63812-221 Fax -444
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

    I'm having the same problem. The last version of Forte known to work with Rose is Forte 3.0, but I can't find that version for download.
    Let me know if you've found any other solution.
    Adam Southall

  • Rational Rose product and Forte

    Has anyone used Rational Rose products and Forte? Could you post a short
    summary that explains how easy/hard it is to work with and whether or not
    the reverse engineering features work well?
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

    Eric,
    As part of tool evaluation for modeling, We evaluated Rational Rose 98i . We
    were able to import forte pex files into Rose model.
    We had no problems with reverse engineering but there were problems related to
    round trip engineering.
    Since Rational Rose 98i did not have a repository based solution for
    configuration management, it was quite a task to keep the model in sync with
    multiple users updating it. However, I believe you can use Microsoft Source
    safe for configuration management though we did not try this.
    Ramesh Timakondu
    PSI Data SYstems Ltd.
    One Bank Street, Ste. 406
    Stamford, CT, 06905
    (203) 359 3992
    tnkrampsidata.com
    "Fingerhut, Eric" <Eric.Fingerhuthbo.com> on 02/16/2000 04:26:59 PM
    To: "'kamranaminyahoo.com'" <kamranaminyahoo.com>
    cc: (bcc: Ramesh Timakondu/Consultant/NAC)
    Fax to:
    Subject: (forte-users) reverse engineering with Rational Rose
    Is anybody using the above?
    If so, have you developed any scripts to facilitate updating the Rose model,
    and which you'd be willing to share? Or perhaps discuss jointly writing
    same?
    Ideally, there would be an Fscript to facilitate exposting Forte projects,
    and a Rose script to facilitate import.
    TIA,
    Eric
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

  • Reverse engineering with Rational Rose

    Is anybody using the above?
    If so, have you developed any scripts to facilitate updating the Rose model,
    and which you'd be willing to share? Or perhaps discuss jointly writing
    same?
    Ideally, there would be an Fscript to facilitate exposting Forte projects,
    and a Rose script to facilitate import.
    TIA,
    Eric

    Eric,
    As part of tool evaluation for modeling, We evaluated Rational Rose 98i . We
    were able to import forte pex files into Rose model.
    We had no problems with reverse engineering but there were problems related to
    round trip engineering.
    Since Rational Rose 98i did not have a repository based solution for
    configuration management, it was quite a task to keep the model in sync with
    multiple users updating it. However, I believe you can use Microsoft Source
    safe for configuration management though we did not try this.
    Ramesh Timakondu
    PSI Data SYstems Ltd.
    One Bank Street, Ste. 406
    Stamford, CT, 06905
    (203) 359 3992
    tnkrampsidata.com
    "Fingerhut, Eric" <Eric.Fingerhuthbo.com> on 02/16/2000 04:26:59 PM
    To: "'kamranaminyahoo.com'" <kamranaminyahoo.com>
    cc: (bcc: Ramesh Timakondu/Consultant/NAC)
    Fax to:
    Subject: (forte-users) reverse engineering with Rational Rose
    Is anybody using the above?
    If so, have you developed any scripts to facilitate updating the Rose model,
    and which you'd be willing to share? Or perhaps discuss jointly writing
    same?
    Ideally, there would be an Fscript to facilitate exposting Forte projects,
    and a Rose script to facilitate import.
    TIA,
    Eric
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

  • Modeling Data warehousing elements in Rational Rose

    Hi
    I am working in Datawarehousing project. we are using Oracle warehouse builder 9i and Oracle express 6.3.4.
    Warehouse builder: WIn2000
    Express: SUnsolaris
    Database: oracle 8.1.7
    can i model the datawarehousing elements in Rational rose...
    because Datawarehousing and OLTP are going in parallel. we would like to know the changes done in OLTP tables.Suppose if any change happens in OLTP table, i will have to estimate the effort of ETL work. Is there any way modelling can be done for Datawarehousing elements with OLTP tables.
    your inputs are welcome.
    Thanks
    narasimha.

    Narasimha,
    Although I we are working on a metadata integration solution that will also accomodate Rational Rose users, at the moment I would strongly suggest that you do the warehouse modelling in OWB.
    Regards:
    Igor

  • Oracle 9i JDeveloper & Database & jdk 1.4 & Rational Rose 2002

    I am not sure if this is the place to ask these types of questions, but i am goin to ask anyway
    Here is my situation, I am doing a project with Rational Rose UML model. The program is written in Java, I wanted to use Rational Rose 2002 for UML model, JDeveloper for coding and Oracle Database
    1. After i downloaded Oracle 9i JDeveloper, the program said its certified for JDK1.3.1_02, is it safe to use JDK1.4.1_1 with it?
    2. Can i use 9i JDeveloper with Oracle 8i Database or its best to use 9i JDeveloper with Oracle 9i Database?
    3. Since Rational Rose 2002 only has Oracle 8 dataType, should i use Oracle 8i with it? or Oracle 9i will work anyway?
    Please help and email me at [email protected]

    1. To run JDeveloper use jdk1.3 but you can use it to develop applications with jdk1.4
    2. You can use Oracle9i JDeveloper with Oracle8i.
    3. Oracle9i will probably work, but rational might not be able to take advantage of the latest features of the database. Check out the UML capabilities of JDeveloepr.

  • Rational Rose TopLink Integration

    I'm about to start a new project hosted on OAS and looking for Object-Relational Mapping Tools.
    I want to follow a Model Driven Architecture (MDA) methodology, using UML as the master definition of the persistent model.
    The questions I need to know about Oracle TopLink is as follows :-
    i) Does a project generated from Rational Rose work with Oracle TopLink
    ii) Does Oracle offer an alternative modelling tool.
    ii) Does Oracle TopLink provide an incremental DDL generation tool, i.e. only generating alter statements to existing schema
    Many thanks
    Pat

    Sapna,
    There was a earlier post regarding this topic - perhaps you'd like to review that?
    The link is re:How to Integrate with Rational Rose 2002
    or click on "search forum" and enter "Rtaional Rose".
    Regards, Guus

  • Errors in reverse engineering process using rational rose

    Hi i am getting errors in reverse engneering process of making diagrams from java code.
    here si the loge file but i am not able to know the cause.
    00:18:13| CLASSPATH=D:\PROGRA~1\JMF21~1.1E\lib\sound.jar;D:\PROGRA~1\JMF21~1.1E\lib\jmf.jar;D:\PROGRA~1\JMF21~1.1E\lib;d:\JMF2.1.1\lib\jmf.jar;�B9
    00:18:43| CLASSPATH=D:\PROGRA~1\JMF21~1.1E\lib\sound.jar;D:\PROGRA~1\JMF21~1.1E\lib\jmf.jar;D:\PROGRA~1\JMF21~1.1E\lib;d:\JMF2.1.1\lib\jmf.jar;�B9;e:\Final Project\EE\src
    00:19:07| Error Resolving qualified name String occured in File e:\Final Project\EE\src\com\pcit\application\Cataloge.java
    00:19:07| Error Resolving qualified name String occured in File e:\Final Project\EE\src\com\pcit\application\CheckValidSession.java
    00:19:07| Error Resolving qualified name String occured in File e:\Final Project\EE\src\com\pcit\application\Course.java
    00:19:07| Error Resolving qualified name String occured in File e:\Final Project\EE\src\com\pcit\application\CourseRegHandler.java
    00:19:07| Error Resolving qualified name String occured in File e:\Final Project\EE\src\com\pcit\application\IErrorMessage.java
    00:19:07| Error Resolving qualified name String occured in File e:\Final Project\EE\src\com\pcit\application\ISucessMessage.java
    00:19:07| Error Resolving qualified name String occured in File e:\Final Project\EE\src\com\pcit\application\ParamParser.java
    00:19:07| Error Resolving qualified name StringBuffer occured in File e:\Final Project\EE\src\com\pcit\application\PathParser.java
    00:19:07| Error Resolving qualified name String occured in File e:\Final Project\EE\src\com\pcit\application\Person.java
    00:19:08| Error Resolving qualified name String occured in File e:\Final Project\EE\src\com\pcit\application\Teacher.java
    00:19:08| Error Resolving qualified name String occured in File e:\Final Project\EE\src\com\pcit\application\User.java
    plz i need reply soon

    I'd find a way to set CLASSPATH inside Rose and forget about a system CLASSPATH environment variable. That's a bad idea. Lots of people are fooled into thinking that their CLASSPATH is all set because they've got an environment variable but don't realize that systems ignore it complelely (e.g., Tomcat, most IDEs, etc.) Rose might be one of them, too. Better to set CLASSPATH inside of Rose.
    I don't even have a CLASSPATH set on my machine. I set it every time I compile or run Java using the -classpath option. JMO - MOD

  • Is there anything like Rational Rose under UNIX platform?

    hi,
    i am looking for an application like Rational Rose that supports UML design.
    any suggestions?
    thanks a lot.

    Yes, Rational Rose.
    http://www.rational.com/products/dstudio_unix/index.jsp
    Alternatively Argo UML (http://argouml.tigris.org/features.html) is free, open source and Java based so is OS independent.
    Pete

  • Rational rose reverse engineer bug?

    I have a problem to do reverse engineering via rational rose enterprise edition of 2002 on windows XP for my existing java project. If a class has multiple implementations, only the first inherit relationship will be shown. For example, if class A implements interface B, interface C and interface D. the rose will only shows class A has an inherit relationship with interface B. There is no relationship will be shown between class A and interface C and D but actually class A also implements them.
    Anyone can help me find out what is wrong?

    In rose:
    Tools -> Java/J2Ee -> Reverse Engineer and then you set the classpath to what you want to reverse.

  • Rational Rose

    Hi,
    I have a Rational Rose model where I have a sequence diagram which
    shows the objects (with their classes). It also shows the messages
    between the objects as method calls (i.e. the names are like
    sendNotification(), updateView() etc).
    How can Rational Rose convert this sequence diagram to a basic class
    diagram? I don't expect the relationships to come out, but the classes
    with their attributes and methods should be visible.
    Is this at all possible? Rose does quite a lot of intelligent
    engineering within a model but I don't know how to figure it out.
    Please help.
    With best regards,
    Sayan Mukherjee

    Create a class diagram and drag the class objects from the Logical view onto the class diagram. Voila...

  • Jdev VS Rational Rose

    Good day,
    I have been looking for a document comparing Oracle's JDev against the IBM's Rational Rose. A customer is keen on both IDE's I would like to position Jdev better. I know its not easy to find such documentation, I have looked in compete.us.oracle.com and in the IBM website with no luck, this is probably a shot in the dark, but If any one has some light regarding such documentation please reply
    Kind Regards
    Thabo

    And by the way Rational Rose is a dead product - http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/products/rose/
    "IBM announces the withdrawal of the Rational Rose XDE product family
    However, the Rational Rose components will continue to be supported and will be re-packaged into a new set of offerings"

  • Rational Rose Integration

    Hi All,
    Can anybody tell me is there a way to integrate Rational Rose with Jdeveloper.
    Regards,
    Sapna

    Sapna,
    There was a earlier post regarding this topic - perhaps you'd like to review that?
    The link is re:How to Integrate with Rational Rose 2002
    or click on "search forum" and enter "Rtaional Rose".
    Regards, Guus

  • Rational rose trial

    found that IBM is giving out free rational rose trials here + tons of other related
    info
    http://www.ibm.com/vrm/software/powerpack/vertexera
    enjoy
    Joe

    Create a class diagram and drag the class objects from the Logical view onto the class diagram. Voila...

Maybe you are looking for