Raw Camera Support for OS 10.3.9

Hi There,
I have an eMac running on OS 10.3.9 (Panther) which I am unable to upgrade either with Adobe Plug-ins or Apple software fixes to support RAW camera formats.
It would be great if someone could let me know the following:
A) If there is a quick fix that will enable me to view my RAW format software with the current set-up.
The camera and supporting software is a SONY A200.
B) If the only way around this is to upgrade the system software to Tiger or later and if so where can I buy the upgrade. The apple site doesn't seem to package the programmes only upgrades!
Thanks a million in advance,
Wes29, Dublin, Ireland.

Hello all,
I have Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger and have iPhoto '08. It supports RAW, and therfore Tiger will support RAW. Now I have read up and see you have a Sony A200? Well see if the A200 is compatible with iPhoto '08 and we can go from there. Also, iPhoto should be compatible since it works with almost all cameras ( I have yet to hear about it not workin with any cameras yet) so I'm assuming it will work. But I cannot guarantee that.
Regards,
Your Fellow eMac User,
Matthew Knice

Similar Messages

  • RAW Camera support for Canon EOS 500D?

    I just bought the Canon EOS 500D and now Aperture returns an "unsupported image format" when I shoot in RAW. I have the latest RAWCameraUpdate.pkg with version 2.5.
    Still nothing.
    Help!?

    What you can do for now is use Aperture to organize and collect your images while you wait for a RAW update. In the interim, if you need to get images out for printing, email, web, etc. export the master and use the very underrated DPP (Digital Photo Professional) that came with your camera. It does a very good job with RAW conversion of Canon files and actually gives you some advantages over Aperture and ACR/Ligthroom in that it will let you apply your camera technologies that you lose when you shoot RAW over JPEG.
    It's rather limited in what it can do in comparison to Aperture or Lightroom, but for simply getting excellent images from your RAW files, with basic edits like cropping, sharpening, and exposure it's very good.

  • RAW Camera Support

    On an otherwise big news day for Aperture users, Apple has let down the Leica community once again by not including RAW camera support for the M9 rangefinder. Leica provided M9s to Apple back in September, and Apple should have had more than enough time to include RAW support for the M9 in Aperture 3. Many pro photographers and Leica owners are mac owners, and expect more of Apple. Come on Apple, please deliver the goods.

    Aperture 2.0 does read M9 DNG / RAW files, but it does not support the M9 with a camera specific RAW profile. Instead, it applies the RAW profiles Apple created for Leica's M8 and M 8.2. The results are OK, but with the M9's full frame sensor, they fall far short of what would be achieved with an M9 specific RAW profile that reads the M9's internal configuration data. Apple has had M9s from Leica since September, when the M9 was introduced. The expectation of M9 and mac owners has been that by now, Apple would have developed a specific RAW profile for and supported the M9. Without such support, many M9 owners have been taking a pass on Aperture, and Aperture 1.0 and 2.0 owners will surely not upgrade to Aperture 3 without an M9 profile.

  • RAW Camera updates for CS3

    HI Folks,
    I'm using the CS3 Web Premium suite with Photoshop CS3.  I am having trouble importing RAW camera files for one of the newer OLYMPUS SLR's.   All the recent Adobe RAW updates seem to be only for CS5.
    Where can a person get support for CS3?  (sorry, I'm not into spending hundreds of dollars updating at this time..)
    Gary

    For the convenience of opening raw files from new cameras directly into Photoshop, Adobe simply expects you to buy a new version of their software when you buy a new camera.  They have provided, as mentioned above, a somewhat roundabout way to do it with DNG.
    Photoshop CS5 has some nice new features (especially over CS3) which make it well worth upgrading.
    -Noel

  • Raw file support for HS50EXR in LR4

    When will raw file support for the new Fuji HS50EXR camera be added to Lightroom 4?
    I noticed the the other fuji cameras from the HS/EXR range are supprted but the new HS50EXR has not been added as yet...can i hope that raw file support for the new Fuji HS50EXR camera will be added real soon?...please!

    I suspect it might have been released a bit late for the next camera update version, it really depends on how soon Adobe get their hands on a camera.

  • Current Lightroom / Camera Raw Camera Profile for Sony ILCE-6000 inaccurate: green cast in shadows! Capture one better! Please fix it!

    Hi folks from Adobe!
    Please take note that the current Lightroom / Adobe Camera Raw Camera Profile for the Sony ILCE-6000 is very inaccurate: There is a serious green cast in the shadows!
    Capture One Express for Sony (which is free by the way) renders a lot more correctly!
    Please correct this, since I'd rather buy the coming LR6 because of keeping my established workflow instead of going the Capture One route.
    A good example can be found in the dpreview forum "LR5 A6K shadow pulling, a mess! Adobe LR is broken? "
    Or search for Philp Reeves 3 weeks with the Sony A6000 review "3 Wochen mit der a6000", where he compares it to the Sony A7, using both times Lightroom to push the shadows.
    The Sony A7 is fine where earth looks like brown earth, the A6000 picture looks like grass instead.
    Please fix this! This is a high volume camera frequently bought by enthusiast or as second body for FF photographers. That would be really great!

    I am talking about the two raw files linked in the very last post of page 6 of the Reeves comparison thread, not JPGs or screenshots of unknown manipulation.  In LR they both say f/11 and ISO 100 and have a similar tone, but one is shot at twice the shutter speed as the other.  This side-by-side is using Adobe Factory Defaults for each image where the profile is Adobe Standard, the toning sliders are all 0, tone-curve linear, and the Sharpening and Color NR are 25:
    However, when I look at the camera-embedded JPGs, side-by-side, the 1/80th image on the left is darker than the 1/40th image on the right, as expected given the reported shutter-speed difference:
    And it is indeed the darker image that has more shadow problems, also as expected.
    When I do manipulate the darker (a6000) raw file in LR, I do see that the shadows are greenish when brightened unlike most other cameras which usually show magenta, which is the combination of the blue and red sensors showing more noise because there are half-as-many photosites as compared to the green, so I am seeing what people are complaining about and would expect shadow noise to be purple not green, I'm more concerned that these two example raws aren't actually comparable due to apparent differences in exposure.  It is also odd that the lens listed in LR is different than the lens listed in the filename, so either someone has mistakenly or deliberately renamed the file wrong or someone or something has changed the EXIF parameters that LR is reporting to be the same when they're really not.

  • Camera RAW image support for Pentax K100D

    Hi,
    Firstly, let me just say I have a MacBook Pro which came preloaded with Tiger. A month or so ago I upgraded to Leopard and I have applied all the available Apple software update.
    I recently got a Pentax K100D digital SLR camera capable of taking images in RAW format (the pentax saves these with a .PEF file extension) and I have been trying to view these images in Leopard. I read the article below, which says that Leopard provides system-level support for the Pentax K100D camera RAW format.
    *Digital camera RAW formats supported by Mac OS X 10.5*
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=306835
    Now, my problem is that I cannot seem to be able to open the .PEF files with neither Quick Look, Preview, iPhoto or Aperture. Basically, none of these programs seem to be able to display my .PEF files. Aperture says 'unsupported image format'.
    I have installed the software that came with my Pentax (i.e. Pentax Photo Browser and Pentax Photo Laboratory) and these applications can display the .PEF images just fine. For what it's worth, I installed this software before I upgraded to Leopard.
    If I right-click on a .PEF file in Finder, the only programs listed in the Open context menu are the above two Pentax applications.
    So, what am I missing? Clearly something seems to be screwy in my Leopard set up. Is there some way to 'repair' the RAW image support in Leopard??
    I would appreciate any help in fixing this as I would really like to start working with RAW images in Aperture and iPhoto.
    Finally, just be aware that I am not an experienced Mac user. I have always used Windows until now and so... if you have a fix for this I would really appreciate a slightly more elaborate response.
    Thanks in advance,
    Eddie

    I have done a little more research on this...
    As it turns out, my camera is a Pentax K100D Super - not a K100D. The K100D Super is not listed as one of the supported camera RAW formats in the aforementioned article. So I guess this means that my camera is as yet unsupported. Sigh...

  • How do I get Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) support for my new Canon EOS 7D mkii.

    I purchased the new Canon EOS 7D mkii in early November. I tried opening the raw files in both the latest Creative Cloud versions of Photoshop and Lightroom. I found that Adobe Camera Raw, both the current versions and ACR 8.7 beta/release candidate, did not support this camera. I know one exists because dpreview reviewed the pre-relase version of this camera in mid-October showing images processed with an unreleased version of ACR?
    How do I get this early unreleased version of ACR for this camera?

    Canon Eos 7D Mark ii was launched after we released ACR 8.7 RC. So, that’s the reason it is not included in the RC version. However, it is on our radar and hoping to add it in an upcoming update itself.
    As soon as it is available, it will be updated in the below article.
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
    ~ Arpit

  • Raw camera support in photoshop 10 for the panasonic fz200

    when will photoshop 10 support my new panasonic fz200 for raw camera efforts??

    Sorry, but it's not going to happen. You can download the free Adobe DNG converter and convert your raw files to DNG files that your version of ACR can read, but the fz200 requires ACR 7.2 and only PSE 11 can use any version of ACR 7.

  • Raw Processing Support for Canon D5

    Is this in the current 1.01 version of Aperture. I thought it was but saw some posts that make me rethink my recollection.

    "Optimized" means that images from the camera have undergone an extra level of quality review, with the goal of delivering the best quality rendering.
    As has been mentioned elsewhere on this forum, the RAW decode quality - for all supported cameras - has been greatly improved in v1.1.

  • Raw Camera Support-Nikon D600

    Where is the Aperture support for RAW images from a Nikon D600 ?

    Hi Léonie,
    I appreciate your answer.
    You have given me a basic understanding of the relationship of RAW image to the sensor and its intricacies.
    I am still frustrated, bacause buying a camera for me involves a lot of research and I feel I let the reviews convince me to purchase the D600. Now I realise, none of the reviewers talked about how they looked at the pictures. What software they used is not in the limelight. When I buy something, I would like to use it without feeling uncertain that the camera will ever come to life and the picture it takes will be what I should be seeing.
    The word RAW is a fairly generic term for me. NEF, on the other hand is like a number which is equivalent to the same number. I.e. 2=2 NEF=NEF. My conclusion is attributable to my scientific background. I am wrong.
    Buying a camera whose product must be first converted to be used by a multitude of software is unfair to me. Release of the structure of the sensor makes the software industry able to adjust the missing link. Well, this suggestion makes me think. At this moment I am not sure I accept it. I want to be able to use the camera the next day I buy it and I don't feel like waiting for an unspecified length of time before it turns out, I am faced with yet another purchase. Purchase of CS6, because it will have an update that will process my pictures.
    I wish to build up enough knowledge on the features of DNG which is the best candidate at this time. I found many uncertainties about the DNG structure and content. I want to make sure it is the real image I should be seeing.
    Thanks again for you reading my lines and taking time to reply.
    Best,
    géza

  • Will there be Canon 5D Mk3 RAW plugin support for Photoshop CS4?

    I have Photoshop CS4, and have not upgraded to CS5. I have a Canon 5D MkIII, and I currently am unable to process the RAW images.

    AnysiaC wrote:
    But CS6/ACR can't read the 5Dmk3 raw files.Hope this is updated before the CS6 release date.
    Many people do, and I'd be kind of surprised if they didn't update it to at least match the support in the 6.7 RC - but they may not, instead relying on the update mechanism to deliver new camera support down the line some time.
    It's all a big pipeline that just keeps flowing.
    -Noel

  • Nikon D40x NEF raw files, Support for

    Need Support for Nikon D40x NEF raw files
    Also needed in CS2, CS3

    See
    Here!
    Don
    Don Ricklin, MacBook 1.83Ghz Duo 2 Core running 10.4.9 & Win XP, Pentax *ist D
    http://donricklin.blogspot.com/

  • Tethered Camera Support for Nikon D3200

    I need to shoot in tethered capture mode and have found that my D90 in not fully supported in this mode.  A D7000 is fully supported, but will cost somewhat more than I had hoped to spend.  The new D3200 would be an excellent match for our needs (dental photography).  My question: Does anyone know if this camera is supported in tethered capture and if not, does Adobe plan on adding it as a compatible camera anytime soon?
    Thanks,
    J S Mott

    J S Mott wrote:
    Does anyone know if this camera is supported in tethered capture
    http://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom/kb/tethered-camera-support-lightroom-4.html
    does Adobe plan on adding it as a compatible camera anytime soon?
    Doubtless Adobe knows, but this is a user to user forum, so I wouldn't hold your breath for anything formal from Adobe here except "eventually". Maybe.

  • Ni-imaq for 1394 camera support for sony dv cameras

    Hello,
    I am wondering if there is any way to capture images from my sony mini dv recorder (DCR-PC101 NTSC) to Labview.  Is it possible through ni-imaq for 1394?
    Thank You.

    Hi charliec,
    Support for mini dv cameras is not currently available with the IMAQ 1394 driver.  The only way to access the files captured by the camera are to download them to disk then open them with LabVIEW (or some other programming environment).
    S. Arves S.
    National Instruments
    Applications Engineer

Maybe you are looking for