RAW DNG sequence / Edit Original with ACR within Premier

I need to speak to a Adobe Premier expert. I have a RAW DNG sequence shot on my Canon 5d Mark 3 via Magic Lantern imported into my premier project now. I want to edit the DNG's image settings with ACR (adobe camera raw). So i right click on my DNG sequence / clip and go to Edit - Original . ACR pops up and i make my image modifications. I click ok but the DNG sequence doesnt change, its stays the same.
Now i can do all this without trouble within After Effects, but it just adds another step to my workflow. When it should be working within Premier. Im still waiting to see if ACR will ever work directly within Premier.

Maybe whoever answers your question can give me some insight. I imported my DNG sequences to After Effects, because Premier wouldn't import the DNG sequences,  and created a new comp for each of the shots I have. Later in Premier I imported all those AE comps. Now where would be the correct place to color correct and grade this? Straight in Premier? Or will I be loosing the flexibility of the DNGs? Should I do it instead in the AE comps? Or maybe it doesn't matter? Thanks for the help!

Similar Messages

  • Edit original with hard link

    Hi
    I re install adobe with a new graphic card after problem related to extended but not in the default path .
    In dreamweaver CS6  when insert a smartobject  psd file  and useright clcik contextual  menu for select  "edit original with " ( to have acces to original psd not the image use in html page ) .
    Dreamweaver show me "unable to launch ... Photoshop.exe " .
    I can choose  browse to the the real photohsop.exe location but my choice is not save  !!
    1) why adobe developper use static hard link when implemented this functionnalities ?
    2) is there a way to set a custom path to photoshop in the DW setting ?
    3) DW is higly customizable  , does this issue is documented  in adobe documentation ?
    4) smart object is limited if we  have acces only to the whole psd view not part of it like directory or specific layer  !!
    5) i hope this value is not store in binary file ( dll ) but  rather in text format ( file or in registry  ) and thus it can be edit  easely !
    regard's

    hi i fint it easely and i change many  location value in regedit after find the default value under   ( fr_FR language)
    Ordinateur\HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Dreamweaver CS6\Helper applications Preferences\Editor GroupX
    is there easy enhanced way to use smart object in CS6  ?
    regard's

  • Why no 'Edit Original' with raw or dng files?

    Is there a reason Lightroom does not allow the ability to use an external editor on the original raw/dng file? Why force people to use the Capture NX raw converter if they would like to use their camera specific converter instead?

    This is a great point. There are many instances where I need to use a camera manufacturer's conversion software because I am unable to get similar results in Lightroom (Still a problem in LR3 - many posts about this in these forums).
    I was going to write about a tip for a workaround, but instead I actually uncovered a very unfortunate behavior in LR3.
    Previously, in LR2.x, you could drag any thumbnail from the Grid view onto the app of your choice in the dock. It would immediately open the original file (including RAW images) in that editor, and you could then save a Tiff to be re-imported into LR, or whatever you wanted to do. It was great flexibility, and got around having the formal ability to assign an external editor for RAW files (which by the way I agree, is necessary functionality, and should be included).
    NOW, in LR3, this behavior has been shut down. You can no longer drag thumbnails from the grid view onto an external editor.
    Adobe Lightroom team - this is a huge mistake. Please restore the old functionality. You should know - trying as hard as you do, your RAW rendering is still not the only game in town. I own your product, along with five other RAW editing applications. Sometimes I need to try each one to see how a particular image works out. I still prefer to use Lightroom as my cataloging software. This will change if you start to close things down to force users to stay in your ecosystem.
    Apple Aperture takes a similar approach - when you drag an image onto an application, you only open a jpeg preview of that image, not the original RAW file. This is one of the reasons I ditched Aperture and moved to Lightroom. I liked the flexibility. Now that this has been taken away, it gives me another reason to consider passing on this upgrade. Please give this some thought. You do not have all the answers for RAW rendering, and realistically, unless camera manufacturers standardize, you probably never will. Give us back our flexibility, or better yet, build it in formally as the original poster suggested.

  • When I click "Edit Original" in the links panel it opens MICROSOFT PAINT!

    When I click "Edit Original" with a jpeg selected in the links panel it opens Microsoft Paint! In Windows (7) the file association is Windows Picture Viewer (NOT Paint!) and in Bridge it is associated with Photoshop CC. In InDesign we have the option of choosing which program to edit linked files with. In Illustrator we are stuck with the astounding Paint! Why?? 17 versions and this still bugs me!

    Thanks Mylenium.
    I know how to change the default program associated with an extension (I would like to keep picture viewer as the default open option for JPG) but I don't know how I change the EDIT association (currently Paint for JPG) in Win 7.
    And it would be much more useful if AI could just give us the option of setting defaults (as Bridge does) OR AI could just use Bridge's defaults OR give us an "Open with" option as in Indesign. So many possible solutions, I've feature-requested this on occasions since CS1, it works in other Adobe apps, so I can only think Adobe is wilfully ignoring this issue for Irritator.

  • I'm considering buying CC LR/PS package. My camera is Sony a7 - raw ARW. I've been editing using PSE10 and ver 8.7 of the external Adobe DNG converter. Will I be able to open the DNG files in LR with the edits preserved? Will I be able to open the PSD fil

    I'm considering buying CC LR/PS package. My camera is Sony a7 - raw ARW. I've been editing using PSE10 and ver 8.7 of the external Adobe DNG converter. Will I be able to open the DNG files in LR with the edits preserved? Will I be able to open the PSD files in LR with the edits preserved? Any import/catalog etc issues between PSE10 and LR?

    Lightroom has no problem reading DNG files. Whether the edits you have done to the DNGs you have originally edited in Photoshop Elements 10 I'm not sure. ACR edits made to DNGs are saved in the DNG file itself, as apposed to a XMP sidecar file, so LR should see those edits. At the worst you will get an exclamation mark in the upper right hand corner of the imported DNGs and clicking on that exclamation mark you will get a dialog box asking you to either import settings from disk or overwrite settings. you would select import settings from disk.

  • Converted raw (or .dng) will not open in ACR?

    OK, now that I've gotten sort-of over the hurdle of synching all the pieces associated with a smart object, I've hit the NEXT hurdle (SOs appear to be the usual double-edged sword - kinda handy in a way but rife with pitfalls and hurdles)...
    I open a .NEF in Bridge, go into ACR and open the file as a Smart Object in Photoshop.  Double-click the layer icon and I'm back in ACR, just like all the demos and seminars I've watched.  But, take the SAME .NEF in Bridge and open it as a standard image in Photoshop, then CONVERT it to a smart object, double-click the layer icon and all I get is a .psd and NOT jump into ACR.  It does exactly the same thing with a .dng file And from Lightroom OR ACR...
    I found an entry from a discussion (not in here, I couldn't find anything about this in here) about CS3 (yes 3), where a user had this problem and was told it's because the original image was opened as a rasterized image, NOT as a Smart Object from ACR...  Which isn't making sense to me 'cause who cares what it was way back when, it's NOW a Smart Object and should be treated like one no matter HOW it got there...
    Is there some preference or setting or something I need to change in Photoshop so this will work as expected is is there really some restriction about exactly HOW the Smart Object got created?  And if so, is there some paragraph is big, bold letters in the documentation that makes it really clear to the uninformed that you MUST open it as a Smart Object or it won't work?
    And yes, I KNOW that in ACR I can set it so it defaults to opening as a Smart Object, but like many other PS users I normally use Lightroom and I haven't seen any such default.  Which means it's REALLY easy to forget to go down to the Open as Smart Object and instead just hit Open in Photoshop...

    Listen, buddy, no one has any obligation to answer your questions here in this user to user forum.  Lose the attitude. 
    I'll repeat the answer anyway, as you apparently are unable to read replies carefully. 
    davepinminn wrote:
    …CAN I take an image that was opened in Photoshop as a "standard" image, then converted to a smart object and edit it in ACR?  If yes, HOW?
    No, ABSOLUTELY NOT !  You cannot. Period. That's what I said in post #2 of this thread.
    ACR will only open and edit Smart Objects that contain raw data.  Any image opened in Photoshop —not as a Smart Öbject—is already cooked and contains no raw data any more. Additionally, ACR can edit JPEGs and TIFFs if you set your preferences accordingly, but with much less latitude and functionality than a raw file.
    What's more, the cooked Smart Object 's now in the cooked PSB format (a variation of PSD that can handle much larger files than PSD can) so there's no way on Earth ACR can open it.
    davepinminn wrote:
    I've gotta remember that people in here will pummel the semantics to death and miss the question…
    …and we forum regulars have to remember that some folks come here just to argue, looking for a fight. 
    Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers: 
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
    Excerpt:
    • Do not be abusive or aggressive in your tone
    An aggressive or abusive sounding post will often evoke an aggressive or abusive and unhelpful reply
    Remember, you are requesting Help from other users, just like you, who are giving their time free of charge. No one is under any obligation to answer your question.

  • Difference in TIFF and RAW import with ACR (how to fix)?

    I'm experimenting with a workflow, so whilst this may seem like an odd thing to want to make work, I have a geniune reason for doing what's described below:
    I have Canon CR2 RAW files from a 7D, Photoshop CS6 13.01 64bit, with ACR 7.1.0.354, running on Windows 7 64bit.
    1. I import a CR2 image via ACR, with no changes to any sliders; opening it as Adobe RGB (1998); 16bit
    2. I then save the image as a TIFF file, leaving "ICC Profile: Abode RGB (1998)" selected in the Color section of the file save dialog
    3. If I then close all files, and reopen the CR2 and TIFF image, they (as expected) appear to be identical
    4. After closing all files again, I then open the CR2 and make an exposure adjustment (e.g. -1.00)
    5. Using Bridge, I select the TIFF file, right click and select Open in Camera Raw. I make the same exposure adjustment as for the CR2
    6. Now, the adjusted CR2 and adjusted TIFF are different. A colour shift is noticable, and for a severe exposure change (i.e. +4.00) the shadow detail in the CR2 is a lot lighter
    Here are two cropped areas from the files (with a 4 stop push), showing some branch/leaf and grass detail respectively. The TIFF has a greener colour cast for the grass, but much darker shadows:
    TIFF
    RAW
    I appreciate that the CR2 is still a RAW file, and as such has the original Bayer pattern data, but is there any way I can make ACR adjustments to a TIFF (taken from a CR2) to behave in the same way as the original CR2?

    ssprengel, Jeff, JJMack - thanks for the constructive replies
    station_two - after your use of mildly aggressive language ("What seems to escape your grasp") in your first post, I had money that your subsequent response(s) would be on the lines of "I'm too busy to explain it to people like you". Thankyou for confirming my expectations (sometimes I wonder if some people engage in forum discussions for the sole purpose of trying to get themselves [and possibly others] riled)
    So... back to trying to find a construcive solution: If the algorthirms for the adjustments in ACR do operate directly on the Bayer data (before demosiacing to RGB per pixel) then operating on the TIFF (or any other demosaiced RGB data) will indeed be a non-starter. Without (probably unlikely) input from an Adobe developer however, we can't know for sure.
    > So RAW numbers after debayering to RGB are linear with numbers of photons within a particular color (R, G or B), while TIF numbers are assumed to be linear with human-vision sensitivity
    Understood (I'm familiar with gamma, camera sensor behaviour, exposing to the right etc). Ultimately though, it should be possible to produce an RGB file that is also linear (i.e. not adjusted for human vision) to then bring back into ACR. However, if that's simply not possible with ACR, then that's also a non-starter (and wouldn't help anyway if the adjustments operate on the Bayer data directly).
    I did look briefly into opening the RAW as a smart object, but sadly I didn't think that'd help. The goal I'm trying to achieve is an experimental idea to blend parts of images together from multiple exposures; but to achieve a single RAW file with that data as if it came from the camera (thus it could be brought into ACR to get the benefit of - from my point of view - the useful and intuitive adjustment sliders). Clearly that would require reverse engineering the particular RAW format for the camera being used (and each and every camera you'd want to support) - thus, it's not really practical.
    I'd hoped to be able to convert (without edits) the RAW images into TIFF (or some other lossless RGB container that I can read programmatically), do the blending to produce a single TIFF, and then bring that back into ACR.
    Whilst it's more convoluted, I suppose it might be possible to generate the unedited TIFF files purely for the purposes for getting data about the images, then using that to create a set of masks. Then, as Jeff suggests, perform adjustments to the RAW files in ACR, and use the masks to blend the imported (and now corrected) RAWs into one image. Not ideal, but perhaps worthy of more experimentation.

  • Trying to open file in photoshop elements, only first option available in Edit Photo window.  The other two has "Edit a Copy is not applicable to raw or Digital Negative files" same for Edit Original.

    Brand new user to Lightroom 5.  Was following tutorials and doing fine editing.  After done editing NEF files, I'm trying to open them in PSE 11 to further edit.  Using the "Edit Photo with Adobe Photoshop Elements Editor".  But the window only has the first option available and the other two grayed out.  Each of those has "...is not applicable to raw or Digital Negative files."  What??

    Ricardo.Amaral wrote:
    What I wanted to do instead was to indeed remove that people from the photo with Photoshop but keep those changes in DNG.
    sorry, no can do...ain't gonna happen.
    What you've done is hit the wall on is the basic difference between lite duty spot healing and photo level tone and color correction (Lightroom and Camera Raw) and heavy duty pixel retouching in Photoshop.
    When you need to substantially manipulate the "pixels" you need Photoshop and you'll be forced to render the raw file into a TIFF or PSD file either through Camera Raw or more better, via Lightroom.
    You can do the basic tone and color correction directly in Lightroom and edit in Photoshop from Lightroom. But you will NEED to create and save out a "rendered" image that is no longer raw...then retouch to your heart's desire, save it and it'll be available in Lightroom along side your original raw if you choose.
    But no, there's no way to open a raw in Photoshop, manipulate the heck out of it with massive retouching then save that back out as a raw file...ain't gonna happen.

  • How to edit original raw from LR?

    Sometimes in my workflow id like to take the original raw, edit it in photoshop cs3 acr instead of LR, but save the resulting image as a stacked image under the original in LR.
    Why cant I just do 'edit original' as a RAW in LR? What would be the best way to do this?
    Cor

    Get Adobe's free DNG Converter (Windows | Mac OS) - it lets you extract those embedded raw files.

  • Prerendert mp4 replace with RAW DNG in After Effects

    Hello,
    I try to replace a mp4 clip with RAW DNG. The mp4 clip was made from the RAW DNG, but when I try to replace it, the length of the clip never fits.
    Details:
    1. RAW DNG recorded with 30fps
    2. RAW DNG with Media Encoder to 30 fps mp4 rendered
    3. mp4 import to AE
    4. Replace mp4 with RAW DNG
    Result:
    mp4 clip length = 08:19:12
    DNG RAW length = 06:39:04
    The info window shows bith clips with 30fps .
    Both clips shows: 0000000-0011973 (frame count from dng raw )
    All Settings on 30fps:
    Media Encoder: "Media / Indeterminate Media Timebase: 30fps"
    After Effetcs: "Import / Sequence Footage 30 fps"
    Premiere. " Media / Indeterminate Media Timebase: 30fps" (just in case  - maybe encoder reference pp..i dont think so..but..)
    What can I do? Im doing something wrong, or is it a software error?
    Even if I dont replace, just import the raw dng to AE it show the shorter lenght, but as well 30fps in the info window.

    I did a testfile.
    I exported a clip (30fps) to png sequence (60fps) and add it to the media encoder and when I press the button "match source" Media Encoder shows me (again) 23,976fps, but when I manually put it on 30fps it really export with 30fps. So I have a mp4 with 30fps
    So I import that mp4 to AE its 03:29, when I import the pngs itself directly to AE its 03:29. So my setting seems to be correct. I choose the same settings importing RAW DNG.
    I recognize that Media Encoder doesn`t recognize that the RAW DNG is a picture sequence, in the import window the "import sequenze square" is grey out, but it imports it as a the picture sequence, but not with the correct fps.
    Its confusing, because it shows in the the clip info, after rendering the correct fps (30fps), but its not 30fps , its more like 23,976 frames. So it really looks that its a adobe software error.
    Is it?

  • Edit original in photoshop : raw vs jpg

    Hi,
    my problem : when I modify a raw file in LR, and then do some corrections in Photoshop, when I come back to LR, all the initial LR modifications are now made permanent to the image and no way back.
    I did not have that problem with jpg files where I followed that process:  I modify them in LR, and then choose the "modify a copy" option when going from LR to Photoshop. Then  I do my corrections in photoshop on the copy, and when I go back in lightroom, I copy all the settings from the non-modified initial picture to the Photoshop-modified copy. So I end up with a picture including the Photoshop modificiation, but where I can still change the initial LR editing.
    Any idea how to follow similar process for raw file (I use CR2 Canon format for Raw) ?
    Thanks a lot in advance.
    Julien

    If you start in LR, crop a raw file, do an Edit In PS, you will have only the cropped image in PS, not the un-cropped original file, so I’m not sure I follow the rest of the question.
    Does it help that you can create a virtual copy or a raw file in LR, reset all your LR edits (or just the crop) on the copy, then do an Edit In PS on that copy and so you’ll have the original with LR edits, the virtual copy possibly without some or all LR edits, and then any result you save back from PS.

  • Prompt Disappeared for RAWs Edit Original or Edit a Copy?

    I'm running on LR 5.3, but this problem persisted in LR 5.2.  Working in PS CS6 and Camera Raw 8.3.  RAWs are NEFs from a Nikon D600.
    I can't figure out what happened but suddenly I am not getting prompts when moving from LR to PS to "Edit Original" or "Edit a Copy". 
    I reset all dialog warnings and nothing.  The prompt will appear for TIFFs but not for NEFs.
    Bug?  Fixable?  Help.  It's kind of pointless to not be able to choose to edit an original or copy with LR adjustments for a RAW when they are the file types that retain my RAW editing information.
    Plus, when I do click on a NEF and choose to edit in PS without the prompt (it will appear with lightroom adjustments, not as original), it will open a second icon for photoshop on my dock, and prompt me to continue trial??  I have a version of PS installed with the serial plugged in, and in LR "edit in PS" for a TIFF will open this primary version.

    Thanks gvb, saves me from having to go find that thread myself!!

  • I've been using Elements 10 on my windows 7 machine editing RAW/NEF picture files taken with a Nikon D40X camera with no problems. I upgraded my camera to a Nikon DX7100 and can no longer load my RAW/NEF into elements 10. Is there a compatability problem

    I've been using Elements 10 on my windows 7 machine editing RAW/NEF picture files taken with a Nikon D40X camera with no problems. I upgraded my camera to a Nikon DX7100 and can no longer load my RAW/NEF into elements 10. Is there a compatability problem with my new camera? Will upgrading elements to a newqer version solve the problem?

    NEF's for the D7100 should work with the latest version PSE13
    You can download here and try free for 30 days:
    https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/tdrc/index.cfm?product=photoshop_elements&loc=us&PID=2159997 #

  • Unable to open Raw file in CS5 with ACR 6.7. [was:ACR]

    cannot open raw image in PS5 even though ACR has the latest version 6.7.0.339

    What camera?  ACR 6.7  will not open RAW files for cameras that came out after that version of ACR was released.
    This list will tell you what version is need for your camera
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
    You can download the free DNG converter if your camera is not supported by 6.7
    (I can't give you the link because I am forced to the New Zealand download page.)

  • "Bad" colors/banding when going into Edit mode with Canon RAW files

    Just got my iLife '06 suite yesterday and ran into something very disturbing: something wrongwith the colors of RAW files once you go into editing mode. In the library view, they're fine. Try to edit one, and after a few seconds, there's a final refresh of the image window that heavily alters and bands the colors. (Looks almost like a poor conversion down to 256 colors or less - it's that bad).
    This is happening on Canon 300D and 20D raw files, and did NOT happen with iPhoto 5. The RAW files open up and display just fine in Preview (as well as 3rd party apps) - problem is in iPhoto 6 only. I've already sent in a bug report - has anyone else tried double-clicking on a RAW file to go into Edit mode yet?
    David Miller

    I use Huey from Pantone to calibrate my monitor for consistancy in different lighting situations and across applications. But the same effect happens by choosing any one of the non-standard monitor calibrations.
    Try this:
    Choose a RAW photo and monitor calibratioin that causes the banding and discoloration.
    Open the RAW photo in Edit mode and wait the couple of seconds for banding to appear.
    Next, adjust the image size slider so that scroll bars appear at the bottom and right side of the photo. It doesn't take much. Notice the banding disappears!
    Now grab one of the scroll bars and move it. Observe the banding and discoloration. And, when you release the scroll bar the banding disappears again.
    I don't remember this happening with iPhoto 5.
    I think it has something to do with the display
    calibration. After I first saw this I switched back
    to my default iMac G4 profile, and the problem wasn't
    there anymore. I'm not sure what the difference is. I
    set up several different profiles, each with
    different choices for Advanced, White Point and
    Gamma, and some trigger this banding, and some do
    not.
    Anybody have any similar experiences?

Maybe you are looking for