Raw Imported images are too dark

When I import RAW files from my Nikon D80 they are much darker than they show in the camera's display and I'm always obliged to boost exposure in AP2 by at least 1 to 1,5 step. This doesn't happen if I shoot in JPEG. There is anything wrong in the camera's setup ?

It is worth knowing a little bit about how your D80 processes images in the camera to help answer this one.
When you take a photo, the camera's sensor records the image as a RAW image. It you have selected RAW storage, then this image is stored directly on the compact flash card. However, if you have set the camera to JPEG, then the image adjustment settings set on the camera are used to process the RAW image as it is converted into a JPEG image. These settings are set through your camera's menu. Therefore, the same photo will be stored differently if it has been shot as RAW or JPEG.
Now, when import the RAW image into Aperture, you are seeing the image as recorded by your cameras sensor with no adjustments made. When you import the JPEG image into Aperture, it will already include the camera's adjustments.
Therefore, the differences you are seeing is due to the camera settings that are adjusting the image before it is saved as a JPEG. I would assume that the settings are increasing the exposure.
As an afterthought, it is worth checking if the 'Optimise Image' settings (on my D70, found under the camera settings menu) are making an impact. Best to turn off all settings (or reset them to default) and then retest a shot.

Similar Messages

Photo images are too dark

Photo images loaded into Safari or Facebook, by me or by others, are too dark and I can't find a way to improve them.

Thanks Peter & Sid. I appreciate the advice, but it doesn't match our experience over 12 years of designing web applications so I'm having trouble understanding what's different, can I ask for any more advice you might have?
If we calibrate the monitor using the recommended tools, will Photoshop images look 2-3 f-stops brighter (i.e. as they should look) and will images in all other apps (which look fine now, have always looked fine) look 2-3 f-stops too bright? Or would we be changing JUST the way Photoshop sees the images?
Through probably a dozen different previous CRT and LCD monitors, we've never calibrated anything. Even on our immediately-previous Samsung 213T monitor, images appear pretty much the same in Photoshop as they do in all other places. That includes published web sites viewed with several popular browsers and viewed on literally hundreds of different systems inside and outside of our office.
The previous monitor was being used with exactly the same software and hardware as the new one. The only thing that's changed is the monitor.
Peter asks about brightness or white point luminance. I haven't used any tool to determine that. The monitor is set to 50% brightness, for whatever that's worth, but I can tell you that it is substantially BRIGHTER on white than the previous monitor. The previous Samsung monitor is being run side-by-side with the new one, and it looks quite dull and yellow beside the new one (and we thought it was a great monitor!) The new 30" Samsung has MUCH whiter whites. Does that help even a little?
Thanks for any further advice.

Imported RAW images are too dark

I'm using Aperture2.0.1 and importing RAW images from a Canon 1D MkIII. All the images are coming in significantly darker than they show in the camera's display. The camera's histogram shows that the images are correctly exposed but they require boosting in Aperture's Exposure panel of anywhere from + 1.15 to 1.5 before they look right in Aperture. That's quite a hefty shift. I get a similar situation in Capture One Pro but the same images right off the card look bang on in Canon's Digital Photo Professional. In Adobe Lightroom it takes a shift of only +.5 to get into the right range. The exposure settings for the test were done with a Sekonic L-758DR meter and manually setting 3 580EX's but the problem shows up in all kinds of garden variety shots with or without flash. My preferred app is Aperture but I'm sick of having to adjust all my shots to get them into range.
Is there something I'm missing here?
Thanks,
Geoff

AMAZING!! Thanks for solving this mystery for me. Disabled the Highlight Priority and the shot comes into aperture looking like I it needs no adjustment. There are some clipped peaks in the histogram so there are some minor blown highlights. If I use Highlight Priority, it prevents the clipping and when I adjust the exposure level in Aperture the shot does look right without losing the highlight so Highlight Priority may be the right way to go when I'm shooting jewelry. But your post explains why the images were darkened.
Thanks again,
Geoff

Imported jpeg images are too dark

I understand the reasoning behind the dark images when shooting raw. Mine are imported as jpegs so shouldn't I be able to vew & edit them as I see them in other software
The world explains this for raw files but I cant find anything on JPEG. This has been the case since I purchased lightroom a few months ago. But one time for a few days light room
actual displayed all the files in library and develop mode as I see them in the thumbnails.

Folder View
Microsft Digital Imager
Windows Photo Viewer
Lightroom

Exported images are too dark (too blue) when printed

I imported photos into my trial download of Lightroom and did some cropping but no image quality changes. When I exported them for printing at Walgreens the files all came out much darker (bluer) than the original photos. I sent them to another walgreens and they looked the same.
I sent a test of the original photos cropping them in MS Picture Manager and they came out true to the onscreen version of the photo from one of the same walgreens.
Both the lightroom & MS Print manager were saved as JPGs. The image setting was set to ProPhot RGB 240 pixels per inch.
Anyone know what is going on? Did I do something wrong?

sRGB would be a better bet than ProPhoto for lab printing.
Also FWIW a lot of labs auto correct images.

HT3964 Hello, my isight camer is not working properly, i was using photo booth and suddenly the image was black or too dark and also ichat and facetime are too dark as well, please helpme out i can not find any solution.

Hello, my isight camer is not working properly, i was using photo booth and suddenly the image was black or too dark and also ichat and facetime are too dark as well, please helpme out i can not find any solution.

read this and see if it helps: http://support.apple.com/kb/ht2090

Printed pictures are too dark

My pictures printed from Iphoto 5 are too dark, I have tried my home printer, kodak, and Fuji. The results are the identical. However, when I import the same pictures in Photoshop CS they print just fine.
I am now having the Aperture 2.1.1 "trial" and i have the same exact problem with my home printer. In addition, some of the pictures (not all of them)are not sharp, they seem out of focus. I have exported the same pictures to my desktop and printed them with "Graphic Converter". The pictures are much better, but i still get a few which seem to be out of focus. I then took the same desktop images and used Photoshop Elements 6 ( also on trial)to print them. Photoshop is printing the pictures correctly (photoshop elements 6 does not have a printing profile for Mac's and the printing is managed by the printer's HP software). I must be missing a printer setting when using the Apple programs. My Aperture colorsync setting is set to "HP D7300 premium plus".I have a 1.8 Ghz G5, OSX 10.4.11, and an HP D7360 printer. Can anyone give me an idea of what i am doing wrong?

Hello Donna,
I use the printer settings:
roll paper
premium semigloss photo paper /250)
color: color
advanced settings: 1440dpi with no other boxes checked
I turn off color management
in LR the Profile I made for this special paper/printer is selected.
It's the latest 9800 printer driver, downloaded just a few days ago.
I came across the endless threads on maybe the same subject only some hours ago. (
Sean McCormack, "Printing Problems in Lightroom" #70, 26 Feb 2007 6:19 pm) Tried the trick with chosing the 9800 as default printer, but it didn't help. The printer settings tell me the profile used is: *systemstandard* (that's german: some sort of default (standard) of the system. Maybe it's the same as the "generic RGB profile" mentioned, but I'm not sure.
I also print from LR on a G5 to an Epson Stylus Pro 3800 via USB with absolutely no problems.
Here I want to print from Lightroom on an Intel Duo Core to a networked printer, the 9800.
I'd LOVE first of all to get a somehow *canonical* statement that printing on a networked printer from Lightroom is possible, Yes or No. (As I said before, it is no problem from PS CS3)
If the common experience is, that one cannot print from LR to a networked (Epson pro) printer, then I'll surely not go on reading tons of discussions to find the needle in the hay.
@ Donna: I'd be very grateful for any suggestions!
@ Andreas: certainly the printer driver on the networked Mac G4 the Epson 9800 is attached to is older than the one on my Intel Mac. Is that what you mean? I'll try to fix that.
@ dyp: the profile shown in the printer setting is: *systemstandard* (system default, in german). Looked up Color Sync in the library, I find the profiles folder, but nothing to chose any profile as my default. Where do you do that in Color Sync?
Thank you all a lot for helping!
Johann

Some images printing too dark

I have two cameras that I use with iPhoto 6.0.4. A Canon G4, and a Pentax ist D. In iPhoto both cameras have nice looking images. The images from the Canon make beautiful prints, but the Pentax images print too dark. How can I fix this? Can I set different printing preferences for each camera?

whenever I calibrate my iMac with the Spyder2 hardware, I have to calibrate it twice because I always forget to turn off the Screen Saver and the Energy Saver 'Put Screen to Sleep' option.
another important thing about calibration. where is your 'book located during the calibration? what lights or on or off? is there any direct sunlight shining on the 'book?
personally, I prefer to calibrate at night with all lights turned off. if I calibrate at day, I shut the tinted doors and turn all (fluorescent) lights off. I realise that you are supposed to calibrate under your normal lighting conditions but I prefer this method

Way to verify if newly imported images ARE NOT already in database?

i keep my images in Aperture on v3.4.5 on my Mac Pro and in the past have simply imported images using USB. after starting to use Photo Stream over the last two years it has seemed to me (just from a kind of naive look) that some of my images from my iPhone get imported to the MBP into Photo Stream (Aperture v3.5.1), some to the Mac Pro, and (i assume) some to both.
it also appears to me that if you /change/ your settings for Do Not Import Duplicates from Yes to No, or from No to Yes, (i.e. check or uncheck this option) that it is very easy to ALSO end up (say for instance on my Mac Pro where all my images are supposed to be neatly stored) with /some/ of your images ONLY in the PhotoStream project /and/ also to have some other images in BOTH the Photo Stream projects /and/ in the "non-Photo Stream projects" (i.e. in "regular" projects).
just having this latter issue basically makes a total mess of your database (since you have /some/ of your images /only/ in the Photo Stream projects) but if you add the former issue (some images only in the MBP database and some only in the Mac Pro database) then things are almost truly wrecked.
so - what i would like to know is if i EXPORT images from my MacBook Pro and i then IMPORT them into the Mac Pro database should Aperture pick up duplicates if i have Do Not Import Duplicates checked? also, i would like to know if it is possible to VERIFY through some method whether the newly imported images are, or are not, already in the database.
i am currently exporting images from the monthly dated Photo Stream projects on my MacBook Pro and then importing the images into the respective Photo Stream projects on my Mac Pro - and it does in fact seem to me that these photos do NOT exist in the Photo Stream projects on my Mac Pro. i say this since the new images get added to the Photo Stream project for that month with the next chronological number in that month (at least on my first month i have tested). they also do not seem to exist already in the Photo Stream database in, for instance, the next month which is where i would logically look for them. this then would mean that there is a very large amount of image loss in my database which is a problem.
so what i would like to do is /check/ somehow to see if the images may in fact be already in the database but happen to have not made it into the Photo Stream project for the month (i.e. they /only/ exist somewhere else in the non-Photo Stream projects).
note: for instance can i manually search somehow for "IMG_6789", which just came in with 250+ images in from "Feb 2013 Photo Stream" on my MBP and is now in "Feb 2013 Photo Stream" on my Mac Pro to verify whether this already exists or has been newly added?
please not that i cannot visually search for anything because the database is too large and i do not know where this image may reside without searching or finding it through a Aperture command.
THANKS

hi leonie. thank you for this help.
first can you please tell me if setting Photo Stream on my Mac Pro to ON and turning Do Not Import Duplicates to CHECKED/ON (say if i start new with Photo Stream) has the consequence of ONLY importing images to my PS projects via WiFI and that any time i hook up my phone via USB (as i /had/ been doing) Aperture will then only import anything that has NOT already been imported to PS projects and it will put this in a "non-Photo Stream project"? i mean, i have realized recently that turning this ON may have completely changed the way i import images and done so in a way that puts some images from Camera Roll in one place and some images in another place.
i will divide up the rest into two parts:
1. can you please tell me what the actual difference is between exporting images as Kind Versions and Kind Originals? i am (unfortunately) already doing this as Kind Versions and it appears to be working at least visually - by which i mean when i import photos in this manner to the Mac Pro that these images come into the monthly projects with images and file numbers that do not currently exist in this album. this means that these images (so far ALL of them) were in the laptop database but not on the desktop database (at least as far as Photo Stream is concerned which is all i can figure out right now).
i think it is in fact possible that these images may exist elsewhere in the database (and that Aperture is not picking up the fact that these are duplicates for some reason) but unless i am missing something won't this simply mean that i have a FULL SET of images in the Photo Stream database? anyway, i am not sure which is better - to catch these coming in as duplicates and to not import them or to import them into the Photo Stream projects, have them all in the database in these projects, and to deal with how they exist out of the Photo Stream projects by putting them where they belong and then running a de-duplication routine.
2. the issue that i have been able to understand (with your help) is that when i turned Photo Stream ON, that this Do Not Import Duplicates setting was somewhere buried in my UI independent of Photo Stream settings (which has it's own poorly explained and poorly understood settings) and that this was set to ON or it was set to OFF. if it was CHECKED/ON then i was /ONLY/ importing images to my PS projects which was a total 180 degree change from my normal Aperture methodology and simply put images into PS projects and NOTHING went into my normal projects to sort later as i had been doing. then to compound the issue - when i hooked up my iPhone it would ONLY import images that did /not/ get synced to Aperture and get uploaded to the PS projects and it would tell me how many were already imported and how many were new and APERTURE WOULD SPLIT THESE UP INTO non-PS projects and PS projects which basically makes a total mess of my database.
i mean, what you were able to show me is that i DON'T KNOW what i had set originally but i think i had this setting set to OFF which would give me images both in the PS projects and in the non-PS projects as duplicates (assuming there weren't other issues) but i would ideally like to have had PS projects as just a kind of appendage or an unimportant piece of my database for reference only and to keep importing images via USB as i had done in the past and if this is what i had wanted (and if Photo Stream was implemented in an intuitive way that i as an intelligent computer person could understand) - well i would have set the do not import duplicates to OFF so that the PS images were duplicates of my normal USB imports.
but this - as i write - makes me realize that it has the unintended consequence of letting me import CAMERA ROLL images that were not deleted into my "non-Photo Stream projects" which as you indicate i don't want so this setting seems like it sets up a classic catch 22.

Exported black/white pictures are too dark

Hi,
My exported black and white pictures are too dark. I checked the pictures and the exif info contains information about the color profile RGB and sRGB (see below), but still the browsers (firefox and safari) ignore this and display the pictures way to dark. Is there a way to fix this? firefox has color management enabled and safari probably too. As for firefox: there are probably users that do not have color management enabled and it should work for them as well.
Could the problems be due to the reduced 8bit color depth of jpeg?
Any suggestions are highly welcome.
Thanks!
Color Space Data
: RGB
Profile Connection Space
: XYZ
Profile Date Time
: 1998:02:09 06:49:00
Profile File Signature
: acsp
Primary Platform
: Microsoft Corporation
CMM Flags
: Not Embedded, Independent
Device Manufacturer
: IEC
Device Model
: sRGB
Device Attributes
: Reflective, Glossy, Positive, Color
Rendering Intent
: Perceptual
Connection Space Illuminant
: 0.9642 1 0.82491
Profile Creator
: HP
Profile ID
: 0
Profile Copyright
: Copyright (c) 1998 Hewlett-Packard Company
Profile Description
: sRGB IEC61966-2.1
Media White Point
: 0.95045 1 1.08905
Media Black Point
: 0 0 0
Red Matrix Column
: 0.43607 0.22249 0.01392
Green Matrix Column
: 0.38515 0.71687 0.09708
Blue Matrix Column
: 0.14307 0.06061 0.7141
Device Mfg Desc
: IEC http://www.iec.ch
Device Model Desc
: IEC 61966-2.1 Default RGB colour space - sRGB
Viewing Cond Desc
: Reference Viewing Condition in IEC61966-2.1

Thanks a lot for helping me to track this down. Looking at EXIF information with EXIF tool I get:
Profile CMM Type
: Lino
Profile Version
: 2.1.0
Profile Class
: Display Device Profile
Color Space Data
: RGB
Profile Connection Space
: XYZ
Profile Date Time
: 1998:02:09 06:49:00
Profile File Signature
: acsp
Primary Platform
: Microsoft Corporation
CMM Flags
: Not Embedded, Independent
Device Manufacturer
: IEC
Device Model
: sRGB
Device Attributes
: Reflective, Glossy, Positive, Color
Rendering Intent
: Perceptual
Connection Space Illuminant
: 0.9642 1 0.82491
Profile Creator
: HP
Profile ID
: 0
Profile Copyright
: Copyright (c) 1998 Hewlett-Packard Company
Profile Description
: sRGB IEC61966-2.1
Media White Point
: 0.95045 1 1.08905
Media Black Point
: 0 0 0
Red Matrix Column
: 0.43607 0.22249 0.01392
Green Matrix Column
: 0.38515 0.71687 0.09708
Blue Matrix Column
: 0.14307 0.06061 0.7141
Device Mfg Desc
: IEC http://www.iec.ch
Device Model Desc
: IEC 61966-2.1 Default RGB colour space - sRGB
Viewing Cond Desc
: Reference Viewing Condition in IEC61966-2.1
Viewing Cond Illuminant
: 19.6445 20.3718 16.8089
Viewing Cond Surround
: 3.92889 4.07439 3.36179
Viewing Cond Illuminant Type
: D50
Luminance
: 76.03647 80 87.12462
Measurement Observer
: CIE 1931
Measurement Backing
: 0 0 0
Measurement Geometry
: Unknown (0)
Measurement Flare
: 0.999%
Measurement Illuminant
: D65
Technology
: Cathode Ray Tube Display
Red Tone Reproduction Curve
: (Binary data 2060 bytes, use -b option to extract)
Green Tone Reproduction Curve   : (Binary data 2060 bytes, use -b option to extract)
Blue Tone Reproduction Curve
: (Binary data 2060 bytes, use -b option to extract)
XMP Toolkit
: Image::ExifTool 9.53
Doesn't this include the profile? I use Metadata wrangler and creative commons and morgify as plugins, but these shouldn't interfere with the profile, should they? I also experimented with disabling the metadata wrangler (by clicking disable), but this did not have any effect.
Thanks a lot!
Stefan

Photos received on Facebook are too dark on iPad

Facebook photos on my Mac look fine but are too dark on my iPad. Can I change any settings on my iPad?

This can be caused by a problem with the color profile for your display monitor or color profiles embedded in images. 
You can disable color management to test that. 
You can set the pref gfx.color_management.mode to 0 on the about:config page to disable Color Management. 
You need to close and restart Firefox to make the change effective. 
See http://kb.mozillazine.org/gfx.color_management.mode 
See https://developer.mozilla.org/En/ICC_color_correction_in_Firefox

Photos received in Facebook are too dark

Photos posted in albums on Facebook by friends are often too dark to identify the people. However, other people can go on Facebook and view the same album on their computers and they are fine. I use Firefox on a Mac OS X, version 10.4.11.
It happens frequently, but not with every photo in their album. Some will be OK and others are dark, but it is only on my computer that some are too dark.

This can be caused by a problem with the color profile for your display monitor or color profiles embedded in images. 
You can disable color management to test that. 
You can set the pref gfx.color_management.mode to 0 on the about:config page to disable Color Management. 
You need to close and restart Firefox to make the change effective. 
See http://kb.mozillazine.org/gfx.color_management.mode 
See https://developer.mozilla.org/En/ICC_color_correction_in_Firefox

Hi! I need help, today I connected my mac Book Air to a tv for a presentation and as soon as I conected it the image on my screen went bigger. And I cant find the way to put it back as it was before. The Images are too big! heelp

Hi! I need help, today I connected my mac Book Air to a tv for a presentation and as soon as I conected it the image on my screen went bigger. And I cant find the way to put it back as it was before. The Images are too big! heelp

Morning DeeHutton,
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
For more information on this, take a look at this article:
iPhone: Hardware troubleshooting
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts2802
Best of luck,
Mario

Videos are too dark to watch on Macbook pro?

Ever since I got my Macbook pro a year ago, videos are too dark to watch at any setting.

Hi Paul,
Sorry for the late answer. I live in Europe, so that's why I was asleep ;-)
Basically the command tells your computer to unhide everything on your Desktop, so if you don't have a Desktop, something is definitely wrong.
My guess is that there's something wrong with your account on that computer. You can check that by creating a new account in System Preferences (click on Accounts, click the lock in the bottom-left corner and then click the "+" button just above).
Then try mounting "some" media and see if it appears on the new user's Desktop. If not, I would highly recommend to reinstall Mac OS X.
HTH,
Jasper.

Streaming Video, iTunes rentals are too dark. Help!

Using a 2013 Macbook Air, pretty much fully loaded.
I'm noticing that movies purchased on iTunes, as well as Handbrake rips of my own DVDS, and streaming through both Amazon Prime and Netflix, using MS Silverlight and Quicktime... all videos are too dark. Or rather, the shadows, and blacks are all too dark. I have worked with display calibration and am convinced that calibration is not the real issue here. While using my photo editing software, Lightroom 3, there are no such problems. It is only the video playback.
Is anyone else having the same issue? I had a 2012 MB Air which didn't seem to have this problem as badly as this one.
Looking for solutions.
Thanks!

I have gone through calibration. Please note that other applications, such as Lightroom appear as they should. I also have a spyder, and though I haven't calibrated this monitor, the fact that non-video applications are appearing as they should tells me that the problem is probably with the application running the video playback, or something do to with the video processor. Also note that the problem occurs with both Amazon streaming, Netflix, and videos ripped with Handbrake, and that it occurs with MS Silverlight, Quicktime and with VLC player.
I read some discussion streams from 2012 with the same problem, and calibration was not the issue. I have tried every built in display profile, manually gone through calibration in "expert" mode, etc... I just don't think this is the real issue. Nor does it appear to be a hardware issue. At least not the monitor. Other applications are working just fine.

Raw Imported images are too dark

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for