Raw imports

Why can I not see any raw (NEF) files anymore  afte importing files to Elements 8  ? I only can access the jpegs. I shoot raw AND jpgs.

Which Nikon model are you using?

Similar Messages

  • RAW import parameters in external service

    Hi all,
    I'm extending an application that has been written by somebody else.
    I need to connect to an RFC using CAF external services.
    In this RFC one of the input parameters (GUID) is of the type RAW. When I import an external service (based on this RFC) into the NWDS. I then add is as a dependencie to my Application service, generate a webservice of my application service, build and deploy the CAF project.
    When I now go the the wsnavigator, open my application service and select the operation I want to test. I fill in the paramters and send submit but the RAW import parameter GUID is not being passed on to my RFC.
    In fact when I look at the SOAP message that is being sent, the GUID parameter is empty (it fills in 'AA==' while I inserted '4A53589C71132123E10000009959C278' as value).
    POST /CRMActivitiesWS2/Config1?style=document HTTP/1.1
    Host: lumnrs61.luminus.int:54200
    Content-Type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8
    Connection: close
    Cookie: <value is hidden>
    Cookie: <value is hidden>
    Cookie: <value is hidden>
    Authorization: <value is hidden>
    Content-Length: 416
    SOAPAction: ""
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    <SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
    <SOAP-ENV:Body>
    <pns:ReadOfferData_R xmlns:pns='urn:CRMActivitiesWS2Vi'>
           <pns:offerGuid>AA==</pns:offerGuid>
           <pns:portalId>FOA_test</pns:portalId>
    </pns:ReadOfferData_R>
    </SOAP-ENV:Body>
    </SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
    I think this has something to do with the conversion of the input field to the RAW dataformat. Does anybody know how I can solve this?
    Kind regards
    Wouter

    Solved on my own...

  • Why won't LR5 automatically save my original RAW imports from Nikon D7100?

    Why won't LR5 save my original RAW imports from D7100. I can import them and process them but the originals are then lost. What am I doing wrong? With every other camera the original RAW image is saved in the library.

    Another guess as to what is happening is that your Folders panel section was accidentally closed/hidden in Library. 
    To fix this, right-click on another section name in the lefthand panel and put a checkmark next to Folders.
    The possible sections on the left in Library are:
    Navigator (which cannot be closed or right-clicked on)
    Catalog
    Folders
    Collections
    Publish Services
    A variation of this situation would be that instead of hiding the Folders section entirely, you've merely collapsed it. 
    To reveal the list of folders click the triangle that is pointing towards Folders so that it points down at a now expanded Folders section.

  • RAW import Sony ILCA-77M2 funktioniert in Lightroom 5 nicht. Wer kann helfen?

    RAW import Sony ILCA-77M2 funktioniert in Lightroom 5 nicht. Wer kann helfen?

    The A77.2 is not listed as a newly supported camera in the ACR 8.5 RC available at Adobe Labs:  http://labs.adobe.com
    But it could be added before the final release of ACR 8.5, sometime before July 31st, when the RC expires.  Otherwise, a new ACR plug-in is released every 3 or 4 months.

  • RAW import won't work after OS upgrade

    I used to import my digi-cam (Ricoh GX-100) RAW files into iPhoto without any problem, but since I updated to 10.4.11 iPhoto doesn't recognize these RAW .dng files anymore. What can be done about this? Strangely, this particular camera never has been on the supported camera list for iPhoto, but why did RAW import work before and why doesn't it now?
    I should add perhaps that the cause for the malfunction could also derive from the usage of Onyx (which I downloaded from the apple-site), which I used for system optimization by clicking on the "prebinding" option - however, most likely this has nothing to do with above problem
    thx

    zoranT:
    Welcome to the Apple Discussions. A lot of users have experienced importing problems after upgrading to Leopard and not just with RAW files.
    Since OnyX is not Leopard compatible, there's a beta version available that is, it might have a bearing but I wouldn't bet on it. Try the beta version to re-optimize and see if that helps.
    See bdorf's post this this topic on how he fixed his importing issue: http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=6181481#6181481. He hasn't gotten back to me on how he re-installed Leopard but I'm guessing it was an Archive and Install.
    Happy New Year
    TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
    I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 08 libraries and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.

  • Raw Import Preview from EOS 30d

    Hi All,
    I've got a question regarding RAW importing from a Canon EOS 30D. There are no previews only blank boxes with the image no. at the bottom. If I'm importing jpegs from the camera it's fine I can see the preview image. Also, is it possible to tell Aperture not to import duplicate images? Kind of like iphoto does where it gives you the option of ignoring images on the card that are already in the library.
    cheers
    M.

    Mike,
    Thanks for your response. The camera was directly
    connected to my MBP in both instances (with Aperture
    and Lightroom). I do, however, have a SanDisk card
    reader on order. Will see if that makes a difference.
    Just an update: got the card reader yesterday and did a couple of RAW shoots to test-import previews showed up right away. Hopefully this has fixed the problem.

  • Raw Import Bug

    I'm having some real trouble with Aperture 3's RAW conversion. I spent hours setting up my studio for bright, happy, headshots. On my camera, the photos look perfect, exactly as I want, and the brightness makes her skin smooth and radiant. When I import the RAW into Aperture 3, they look like the photo on the right - dark, and oversaturated. The skin looks terrible, the hair is dark, it's just all wrong. I know Aperture admits that for my Nikon D700 camera it converts my raws 0.1 darker than it should (which to me is unacceptable). But why do I spend so much time perfecting my lighting if Aperture ruins the files on import?
    My question is - is there any way to reset my RAW import options to be Aperture 2?
    I should note that in Aperture 3, when I try to edit a photo to make it look more like I want it to look, it comes out terribly contrasty, I loose highlight detail quickly. It's also overstaturated so when I adjust the exposure, her skin looks a bit too yellow. This is a lot of adjustment to apply to the 800 images I took of her, especially considering I photographed her exactly how I wanted.

    Your camera is showing you, on a very small display, a small JPG conversion done by its internal computer.  It is never going to look like the default converted-from-RAW-on-a-computer-and-displayed-on-a-good-monitor version of the photo.
    The better comparison would be between default RAW conversions done by Aperture, by Nikon's own software, and by an Adobe product.  In all cases, however, you should see more detail, including more subtle gradations across similar areas, and a broader (or more filled-in) luminance range.
    Personally, I'd much much much prefer to have the image on the right to work with (of the two you supplied).  I don't know why you aren't able to get it to look like the in-camera JPG.  If you do, however, applying the same settings to 800 Images is very easy in Aperture (create and apply a Preset, or Lift & Stamp).  Processing studio shots should be quick work because the conditions of the exposure are controlled and identical for multiple exposures.
    As I see it, you have a few practical choices:
    Use the JPGs created in-camera.  If they work, this eliminates several steps in your workflow.
    Use Nikon's (or other) RAW converter to create TIFF files, and import those into Aperture
    Learn how to set up the studio lighting so you get the RAW (and converted-from-RAW) results you want.  Your goal isn't to light the subject so it looks right on the back of the camera -- your goal is to light the subject so your developed pictures look the way you want them to.
    Figure out an Adjustment Preset in Aperture that gives you what you want.  Aperture has robust tools for changing the look of your photos.  If you post a RAW, some of the forum members here (myself included) are likely to essay adjusting it to your specifications (which, of course, you should provide).
    Change the settings for RAW conversion in Aperture.  This, imho, is least likely to help you in the long run.
    I'm sure there are other ways 'round this RAW boulder -- those are just the ones that occur to me.
    Good Luck.
    Message was edited by: Kirby Krieger -- first graph clarified.

  • CinemaDNG 4K RAW Import Needed

    Hi,
    I've downloaded the new firmware and my BlackMagicDesign 4k cinema camera shot in Raw.
    But I can't import the 4K DNG files directly into Premiere Pro CC. It doesn't reconize it.
    When will it be supported by Premiere (I really need it soon) ?
    Many thanks
    Jean-Michel

    No :(((
    S pozdravem
    Martin Zeman
    www.DAtelier.cz
    www.RAWpictures.cz
    7. 8. 2014 v 14:21, jmtari <[email protected]>:
    CinemaDNG 4K RAW Import Needed
    created by jmtari in Premiere Pro - View the full discussion
    Hi,
    do we have any news for this request ? I will soon shot an add with my BMD 4K and I REALLY need 4K raw support in Premiere Pro and Speedgrade.
    Thanks
    Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the forum to embed the image at https://forums.adobe.com/message/6619539#6619539
    Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page:
    To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at . In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
    Start a new discussion in Premiere Pro by email or at Adobe Community
    For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/thread/416458?tstart=0.

  • Difference in TIFF and RAW import with ACR (how to fix)?

    I'm experimenting with a workflow, so whilst this may seem like an odd thing to want to make work, I have a geniune reason for doing what's described below:
    I have Canon CR2 RAW files from a 7D, Photoshop CS6 13.01 64bit, with ACR 7.1.0.354, running on Windows 7 64bit.
    1. I import a CR2 image via ACR, with no changes to any sliders; opening it as Adobe RGB (1998); 16bit
    2. I then save the image as a TIFF file, leaving "ICC Profile: Abode RGB (1998)" selected in the Color section of the file save dialog
    3. If I then close all files, and reopen the CR2 and TIFF image, they (as expected) appear to be identical
    4. After closing all files again, I then open the CR2 and make an exposure adjustment (e.g. -1.00)
    5. Using Bridge, I select the TIFF file, right click and select Open in Camera Raw. I make the same exposure adjustment as for the CR2
    6. Now, the adjusted CR2 and adjusted TIFF are different. A colour shift is noticable, and for a severe exposure change (i.e. +4.00) the shadow detail in the CR2 is a lot lighter
    Here are two cropped areas from the files (with a 4 stop push), showing some branch/leaf and grass detail respectively. The TIFF has a greener colour cast for the grass, but much darker shadows:
    TIFF
    RAW
    I appreciate that the CR2 is still a RAW file, and as such has the original Bayer pattern data, but is there any way I can make ACR adjustments to a TIFF (taken from a CR2) to behave in the same way as the original CR2?

    ssprengel, Jeff, JJMack - thanks for the constructive replies
    station_two - after your use of mildly aggressive language ("What seems to escape your grasp") in your first post, I had money that your subsequent response(s) would be on the lines of "I'm too busy to explain it to people like you". Thankyou for confirming my expectations (sometimes I wonder if some people engage in forum discussions for the sole purpose of trying to get themselves [and possibly others] riled)
    So... back to trying to find a construcive solution: If the algorthirms for the adjustments in ACR do operate directly on the Bayer data (before demosiacing to RGB per pixel) then operating on the TIFF (or any other demosaiced RGB data) will indeed be a non-starter. Without (probably unlikely) input from an Adobe developer however, we can't know for sure.
    > So RAW numbers after debayering to RGB are linear with numbers of photons within a particular color (R, G or B), while TIF numbers are assumed to be linear with human-vision sensitivity
    Understood (I'm familiar with gamma, camera sensor behaviour, exposing to the right etc). Ultimately though, it should be possible to produce an RGB file that is also linear (i.e. not adjusted for human vision) to then bring back into ACR. However, if that's simply not possible with ACR, then that's also a non-starter (and wouldn't help anyway if the adjustments operate on the Bayer data directly).
    I did look briefly into opening the RAW as a smart object, but sadly I didn't think that'd help. The goal I'm trying to achieve is an experimental idea to blend parts of images together from multiple exposures; but to achieve a single RAW file with that data as if it came from the camera (thus it could be brought into ACR to get the benefit of - from my point of view - the useful and intuitive adjustment sliders). Clearly that would require reverse engineering the particular RAW format for the camera being used (and each and every camera you'd want to support) - thus, it's not really practical.
    I'd hoped to be able to convert (without edits) the RAW images into TIFF (or some other lossless RGB container that I can read programmatically), do the blending to produce a single TIFF, and then bring that back into ACR.
    Whilst it's more convoluted, I suppose it might be possible to generate the unedited TIFF files purely for the purposes for getting data about the images, then using that to create a set of masks. Then, as Jeff suggests, perform adjustments to the RAW files in ACR, and use the masks to blend the imported (and now corrected) RAWs into one image. Not ideal, but perhaps worthy of more experimentation.

  • RAW import from Lumix FZ1000 not working in new Photo app for Mac

    I am not able to import from my Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 the RAW pictures into the new Photo Mac app. They are even not shown when inserting the SD card into my MBP.
    I am only able to get the JPEG ones.
    FZ1000 RAW is supported according Apple and was working with previous app.
    Any idea?

    I am able to import them, but I cannot edit them as RAW files. They behave like .jpegs. So correcting exposure for example is a horrible experience. My 5D Mark II files behave as they did in Aperture, so it is the FZ1000 RAWs in particular that are problematic.

  • Sony NEX 6 RAW import issues with Lightroom 4.3RC or 4.2

    Hi all, having a problem with importing images from my Nex 6 or SD card. The image was taken using the 16-50 Sony Kit lens
    Lightroom copies the images (RAW) files without a problem. However within lightroom the images get distorted as shown below. I have disabled all options such as lens or camera correction.
    The exact same thing happens when I import the file in photoshop CS5 after converting it using DNG Converter.
    The original file within the sony software is like this.

    What you are seeing in LR is the actual lens-distortion recorded on the sensor.  What you’re seeing in the camera JPG is a in-camera-corrected image.  Adobe hasn’t gotten around to make a lens profile for your NEX-7 16-50 lens; however, there is one available from the user-community you can retrieve with the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader:
    Win: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5492
    Mac: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5491

  • RAW import from Canon 40D to Elements 4.0

    I have a Canon 40D camera, and still use PE 4.0. I am unable to import my raw files - help! I have downloaded and installed the camera raw 3.7 plug-in. What am I missing? Any advice welcome. Many thanks...

    If no-one else comes up with an answer have a look at my thread under the RAW Issues forum
    m. It may or may not be of help. It's entitled "Opening Raw Files saved as DNG"
    The title might not seem to relate to your question but I think you may be suffering from the same problem I had . If not I'm sure some kind soul will come to your aid.
    If nothing else it may pay you to post your thread under the Raw Issues forum rather than let it get lost where it is.
    Good luck, James

  • Lightroom 1.1 + Vista = No RAW import direct from canon 400D

    My laptop runs on XP and my desktop on Vista and I have a 400D, lightroom 1.1, PS CS2 and camera raw 4.1. I've just migrated my workflow into lightroom which i'm enjoying.
    Both computers read and edit RAW files fine and i've exported and imported catlogs between them.
    My laptop imports RAW files from my camera but my desktop (vista) says that there are no files to import. Either i've done something wrong in setting up lightroom or there appears to be some kind of driver problem.
    I can see them in windows, copy them off my camera in windows and then import them in lightroom from my computer, but not directly from my camera

    The same problem:
    Yuri Nemets, "invisible raw images when importing" #2, 2 Jul 2007 8:43 am

  • Canon CR2 RAW import issue

    I just got a Canon 7D and I shoot in RAW, which with this model is CR2. I can see the pics fine in finder and I can open them in Photoshop CS4, but not in iPhoto. I use iPhoto to organize all of my pictures and would love to keep it that way.
    Is iPhoto 8.1 incapable of recognizing the CR2 format?
    Gracias

    Hi TD,
    sorry for late reply - I was out a couple of days. My latest version of Digital Camera Raw update is 2.6. Even on the apple downloads page (http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/apple/applicationupdates/indexabc3.html) I don't see a 2.7 version nor would auto-update propose a missing update. Am I missing something here?
    Yes, I am importing directly from my camera using USB cable via USB hub.

  • Raw Imported images are too dark

    When I import RAW files from my Nikon D80 they are much darker than they show in the camera's display and I'm always obliged to boost exposure in AP2 by at least 1 to 1,5 step. This doesn't happen if I shoot in JPEG. There is anything wrong in the camera's setup ?

    It is worth knowing a little bit about how your D80 processes images in the camera to help answer this one.
    When you take a photo, the camera's sensor records the image as a RAW image. It you have selected RAW storage, then this image is stored directly on the compact flash card. However, if you have set the camera to JPEG, then the image adjustment settings set on the camera are used to process the RAW image as it is converted into a JPEG image. These settings are set through your camera's menu. Therefore, the same photo will be stored differently if it has been shot as RAW or JPEG.
    Now, when import the RAW image into Aperture, you are seeing the image as recorded by your cameras sensor with no adjustments made. When you import the JPEG image into Aperture, it will already include the camera's adjustments.
    Therefore, the differences you are seeing is due to the camera settings that are adjusting the image before it is saved as a JPEG. I would assume that the settings are increasing the exposure.
    As an afterthought, it is worth checking if the 'Optimise Image' settings (on my D70, found under the camera settings menu) are making an impact. Best to turn off all settings (or reset them to default) and then retest a shot.

  • Aperture 2.0 RAW import on a MacBook Pro 2.26

    I tried to use Aperture on my old 2.0ghz macbook, once. It was within the system requirements but never would run. I regularly use Aperture 2.0 on my iMac 2.8 and it works fine. Sometimes it hangs but in general the workflow is very smooth. Well, my old macbook died so I bought a MacBook Pro 2.26ghz and was excited to be able to edit photos on the road. However, after importing a 4gig CF card with around 200 shots on it (~12mb per shot, I use a Canon 5D Mark I) Aperture just seems to be spinning away on the data and not producing much. I can click on images in the slideshow frame and some of them will pop-up, without regard to the location in the batch. This has been going on for about 45 minutes. I realize that I should max out the RAM but the machine is well within the system requirements... what gives? Thanks in advance.
    To be more specific, the slideshow along the bottom has hash-marked images but no thumbnails. The whirling grey wheel says "thumbnails..." by it. I do this all of the time on my home machine, bulk RAW files take some time, I know but this is really dragging.

    This problem was fixed with the ProKit update, duh... my fault

Maybe you are looking for

  • Billing block is greyed out

    Hi Friends, Businmess does not want to create invoice for sales order. So they went back and cancelled the invoice, now in VA02 sales order billing block is coming greyed out. Why it is coming greyed out? How can I put billing block to the sales orde

  • Can't turn wifi on after new update.  FIX IT APPLE!!!

    I love Apple products but starting to get really aggrevated.  Can't even select wifi to turn it on, tried everything suggested.  Guess I will just have to wait for Apple to release a fix.  Thinking the Samsung Galaxy 3 is looking very nice.

  • Error when deleting applet from card

    I have a JCOP 41 card, where I am working with. I use the JCOP plugin (3.1.0.5) within Eclipse (SDK 3.0.1). I've uploading some applets to my card, but there resides 1 applet on my card that I can't remove anymore, the other can be removed correctly.

  • Is 4GB of memory enough to run windows 8.1 on macbook air or not?

    If I buy macbook air, i scare that my mac will slow down after install windows 8.1 . Because maybe i will use my mac for 3D designing or something. So is 4GB of memory enough to run Mac OS and Windows 8.1 these two operating system?

  • Optimise query on the table which contain 1000 column

    Hi , I have query on the table which contain 1000 columns when i am executing query on same table .It is taking time . Select * from abc where col1 between start_date and end_date ; abc table contain 1000 columns. please tell me how to optimise query