Raw in fullscreen all blak

I have a Nikon D50 camera and use iPhoto 6.0.5 to manage my NEF raw photos. The photos look great but the problem is that if I go fullscreen to edit a picture it goes black after a couple seconds or as soon as I click the picture.
It only does this with NEF raw photos (well maybe all raw photos but I only have NEFs), with JPEGs it works just fine. It's been like this for all versions of iPhoto 6 and I don't know what to do!!
Thanks!

There is a RAW update here: http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/digitalcamerarawsupportupdate101ppc.html for PPC or go here for the Universal version if you have an Intel mac: http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/digitalcamerarawsupportupdate101universal .html
It specifically mentions the D80 which I believe is newer than the D50 so it may not help but its worth a try.

Similar Messages

  • Photoshop Elements Organizer 9 will not read in Canon 70D raw files. All updates have been made.

    Photoshop Elements Organizer 9 will not read in Canon 70D raw files. All updates have been made.

    The Canon EOS 70D was first supported in Camera Raw 8.2 (the plugin used by Photoshop Elements to read Raw files)
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
    Camera Raw 8.2 is only compatible with Elements 12 and later. It is not compatible with Elements 11 or earlier.
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/camera-raw-compatible-applications.html
    Your choices:
    Upgrade to Elements 12 to open 70D Raw files in Elements
    Download the free Adobe DNG converter, convert all 70D Raw files to DNGs then open and edit the DNG files in Elements 9
    http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.displayTab2.html

  • HT201071 why my canon 7d & 70D imported photo all not in RAW format? All in JPEG? Please settle it for me. thank you

    why my canon 7d & 70D imported photo all not in RAW format? All in JPEG? Please settle it for me. thank you

    You should take a look at iView Media or its Pro version. It is a cross-platform (Mac and Windows) program that is free of some of the stultifying limitations of iPhoto. For example, you can create multiple catalogs and you can easily catalog media (not just photos) that are not on the current disk, like media stored on CDs. It has very flexible cataloging features.
    If they have not changed their licensing, you can buy one license to run both the Mac and PC version for one price. You can make one catalog and easily pass it between a Mac and PC with no translation or confusion. This would be much easier than trying to make it work with iPhoto and some other Windows program.
    If you were to go the iView route, you would have to "sync" the data back to the photos so that they carry your keyword etc. data with them to other apps. I don't know if iPhoto embeds that info back to the photos, or if it stays in the iPhoto database only.
    Photoshop Elements 4 is great on Windows, but the Mac version of Elements does not include the cataloging feature because it integrates with iPhoto. I'm not sure how smooth that all works.

  • Nikon 800e Creative Suite 6 design standard getting raw error on some raw files not all

    I have the stand alone version of Creative Suite 6.  I am getting an error on some of my raw file not all of them "Could not complete your request because an unexpected end-of-file was encountered."  I have researched this endless hours but cannot find any help.  When I go to update in photoshop it tells me that my raw files are up to date.  Any one know what to do.
    I have a Dell, 64 bit operating system, Windows 7 Professional,

    I do format in the camera each time after downloading the files with the reader installed in my computer.  This last download nef file 15 gave me that error but nef file 17 would open just fine no problem.  When I contacted the camera store today about this on going problem I told them that I had gotten a new card for the camera but the problem is still there.  They wanted to know if the file would open in Nikon Capture but I don't have that installed on my computer.  I did put Nikon ViewNX2 on and the file would open and I have a different image viewer that will show me raw files and it opens there but not in photoshop.  He thought it might be a software problem.

  • How can i know the quantity of Raw materials in all 4 plants

    There are 4 manufacturing plants and i want to know the status for all the raw material in the 4 plants , Is it possible to have a consolidated report ?

    Hi vivek ,
    Thanks,, Had one more query, can i get a report where i can have the material quantity and value, across for all the plants at a starting of period and the quanity and value of the material  consumed and balance.at the end of the period
    Example; I have a raw material -COPPER ROD , Period is from 1 April2010 to 1 July 2010, I want to know what was the Quanity and Value of copper rod acorss 4 Plants, how much has been consumed (Quanity and Value) and how muchis left(Quanity & Value) as on 1 july2010
    Thanks..Gaurav

  • Latest batch of RAW files has all the raw fine tuning options greyed out

    I shoot about 1000 images a week with my 40d and edit/organize all of them in Aperture... the latest batch (a pretty important batch at that) of 800 or so imported fine but does not allow me to use the 'Raw Fine Tuning' options as if they are JPGs. I can still go to the images i imported last week and the RAW fine tuning works fine, even some in the same album... any ideas?
    Aperture 1.5.6

    more informaion:
    today's images imported fine, so you can rule out the security patch.
    even more peculiar i exported some of the images, and imported the same masters back in and much to my suprise the RAW fine tuning works. I rebuilt the library hoping that would help but it didn't, I'm just going to go back through the library and re-tag and rate my picks from the shoot, but any idea on how to keep this from happening again? it has to be some wacky setting or something, I can export the broken image and the import it again and it works fine.
    any help would be appreciated
    mark

  • Storing/Managing all the raw footage and all the completed videos

    The iMovie '06 instructional video on the Apple pages mentioned that after we edit out our video and it is complete and ready to be viewed, we can upload it back into the camcorder so that from there the video may be viewed on a TV etc.
    This reminds me of something that I thought about a while back and which has to do with keeping copies of our work. My thinking is to put the iMovies into my website but I CAN see my wanting to play it on my 50" TV.
    Questions, then:
    1. If you upload your finished video from the Mac back into your camcorder, then in fact you have a copy right there. So then, DO YOU STILL KEEP THE ORIGINAL CASSETTE OF RAW FOOTAGE AS BACKUP, JUST IN CASE?
    2. In what order would I save to cassette etc if I would like to upload the video to my website AND keep the finished copy in a cassette in my closet as well as in my external hard drive? I ask because I recall earlier that at a certain point, one cannot do certain things with the video. I wish I could recall what I had read.
    3. Here is what I would like to end up with:
    a. The video on my website
    b. The complete video in a cassette so that I could play it on TV if I decide to.
    c. The complete video in my external hard drive.
    d. And actually, WOULD you retain a cassette with all of the raw footage? Or in your external hard drive?
    And the final question is:
    HOW DO YOU ARRANGE ALL OF THESE BACKUPS AND COPIES IN YOUR EXTERNAL HARD DRIVE? I am foreseeing options that I can't answer.
    For example, do I keep all raw footage in one category, and then all completed video in another category?
    Or do I keep things divided up by the particular video itself? By that I mean, do you segregate your backups by all of the raw footage and finished video for TRIP TO ALBANIA, all raw footage and finished video for MARTY'S BIRTHDAY PARTY, all raw footage and finished video for GHOSTS IN THE GARAGE?
    And that's just talking about the video clips that you keep INSIDE your computer.
    Thank you for your thoughts.
    Lorna in Southern California

    Ohh and another thing!
    to archive give the dvd_img or video -ts folder a
    title, that way its easy to find it if you use as
    videodisc with front row Elgato eye tv or equinox
    catagorice as fiction drama cartoon explsit andson
    andson...
    Dear Kjolner.....
    I'm afraid I am lost with your replies because the terminology in the answers are beyond my understanding. When you say that you save something to tape, do you mean, "back to that same small cassette"? I do not know what an .img file is. I am not clear on saving "small segments" on QT. I would not know how to do that, anyhow. I do not understand what a video -ts folder would be. <gulp> <<double gulp>>
    I DO have Tiger and will buy the next one up when it seems safe to do so.
    I recently bought a LaCie 500 gigabyte external hard drive to store everything and lighten up my iMac internal hard drive and make it faster. I had to buy that external HD because while attempting to upload my footage from my Sony digital video camera recorder DCR-TRV 11, my iMac sent up messages that I had insufficient space for the activity.. something to that effect.
    Lorna in Southern California

  • Lightroom, PS, Bridge, Raw, --I have all of these, do I need Lightroom?

    With all of these programs, why do I need to get involved with Lightroom for my photos? What makes Lightroom different?

    Google (Photoshop lightroom differences)
    http://www.mosaicarchive.com/2012/12/12/whats-the-difference-between-photoshop-and-lightro om/
    http://photographylife.com/photoshop-vs-lightroom
    http://www.adorama.com/alc/0014296/article/Adobe-Photoshop-CC-Elements-or-Lightroom-Which- Is-Best-For-You
    I have both Photoshop and Lightroom.  I use Lightroom with all my photos and use Photoshop with some of them for things that LR cannot do.

  • Accidentally turned visualizer fullscreen, now it's fullscreen all the time.

    How do I get visualizer back to iTunes window by default? iTunes 10.6.3.25 doesn't have visualiser preferences listed in edit>preferences>advanced?

    It sounds like you may have the handicap access turned on. Go to the apple help pages to learn how to navigate with finger swipes to get to your settings pages where you can turn this off. I was playing with this feature and I suddenly found I was not able to navigate as usual. I discovered by accident that swiping from left to right worked like a tab button.

  • Calling an R model via a web service - "Error in raw connection", "all connections are in use"

    Hi there,
    I have built an R model in Azure ML using the "Create R model" module and have trained it, turned it into a scoring experiment and a web service. I am now sending new data to it to be scored from an Excel workbook, and getting it to return
    the prediction to the same workbook. Sometimes (but not always) when I try to run it from the workbook I get the following error:
    {"error:{"code":"LibraryExecutionError","message":"Module execution encountered an internal library error.","details":[{"code":"FailedToEvaluateRScript","target":"Score Model (RPackage)","message":"The following error occurred during the evaluation of R script: R_tryEval: return error: Error in rawConnection (raw(0),\"wb\"):all connections are in use \n"}]}}
    Usually, if you just press "OK", it works, but then sometimes it comes up again (seems quite random). I have tried a bit of troubleshooting and know that when you open lots of connections (e.g. with connections()) in R this error can occur, but
    I'm not sure why in this context the error is coming up. Also, before this error I was getting the error regarding "cannot change value of locked binding for 'dataset'" described here:
    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/azure/en-US/e20b8cbf-2e89-4898-b602-d2138bf8901c/cannot-change-value-of-locked-binding-for-dataset?forum=MachineLearning
    and so I made the suggested fix, adding
    unlockBinding("dataset", environment())
    to my Create R Model's Score script. I don't know whether this has anything to do with it or not?
    Could anyone offer advice of how to get round this?
    Many thanks.

    Hi,
    I've solved the problem. For the record I added:
    closeAllConnections()
    at the end of the R scoring script (and at the end of another R-script I was using higher up the pipeline) and that seemed to do the trick.
    Still, I'm intrigued as to why this was necessary.

  • How to remove all changes made to an image in Camera Raw -

    In CS4 with latest ver. of Camera Raw, I think there is a way to remove all changes previously made to an image while using Camera Raw.
    In other words after doing this the little icon in the upper right hand corner of an image in Bridge that indicates changes have been applied to an image, should be gone. Another way of asking this would be to say, how can I start all over again with the original image in Camera Raw by removing all changes prefiously made to it in Camera Raw?
    TIA

    Sorry, I don't know the answer to that for sure*.  As a certified old geezer who avoids cluttering his mind with stuff that can easily be looked up in a menu, I stay away from keyboard shortcuts as much as I can, using only those applicable system wide, the most obvious ones in Photoshop like deselect, etc.
    * However, since no such shortcut appears next to the menu command, I doubt there is one.
    You could create an action and assign it a key command, though.  Doh!
    Never mind.  That was a total brain short circuit.  You can't create actions in Bridge.  You'll need a script.  Ask in the Bridge Scripting forum.
    Message was edited by: Ramón G Castañeda

  • Photo 6 RAW photos don't all open in PSE 6 RAW converter

    I have iphoto 6 and PSE 6 installed on an Intel iMac OS X 10.4.11 with: 2GB RAM, 250GB HD and over half of that free.
    Recently have begun shooting RAW. From iPhoto I have been editing everything in PSE6 without a problem. To open the RAW photos in the "RAW Converter" I have gone to iPhoto preferences, clicked on Advanced tab, and checked the box "Use RAW file with external editor".
    My problem is this: Most of the RAW(NEF) photos in iphoto will open in the RAW converter as they are designed to do when I double click on the thumb nails in iPhoto. However, about 25% of them will not go to the converter. They go, instead, to the regular PSE6 editing window as a JPEG, and nothing I can do will get that photo into the RAW converter. And these are photos from the same series just uploaded to iPhoto6. It makes no sense to me.
    What am I missing and what can I do to correct this problem. I would appreciate any help anyone can give. Thanks.
    David

    TD
    I'm feeling just a little sheepish right now.
    It was your statement that it was either a) I'm imagining it or b) it's a very rare problem. I knew it wasn't (a) and I suspected (b) was probably not it either because too often when something is very rare, there is something simple hidden in the problem.
    So I did some serious reviewing of the problem. I tried to think of anything I had done to those 3 photos that kept them from opening in RAW converter, when all others did fine. It suddenly occurred to me that I had cropped those three, and would have done it in iPhoto before going to RAW converter. I "Reverted to Original" all three photos, after which I was able to open all of them in RAW Converter without a problem.
    So, MANY thanks, TD, for leading me to the solution. And you also taught me some new techniques. Every little bit helps.
    David

  • All RAW files suddenly said to need reprocessing

    I am running Aperture 3.0.3 with OS 10.6.4 so everything is as up-to-date as can be. I upgraded from Aperture 2 within a week of Aperture 3 being released and all my RAW files were updated in the process. Since then, I have added several thousand more pictures directly into whatever the latest version of Aperture was at that time. My RAW files are all from a Nikon D40.
    The last time I used Aperture (about a week ago) everything was normal, but today the program suddenly tells me this about all my RAW files: "This photo was adjusted using an earlier version of Apple's RAW processing"
    Obviously this should be impossible for the several thousand of pictures that have only existed within Aperture 3 as they would have been automatically processed using the latest version. However, if I filter pictures by which RAW processor was used for decoding, every RAW file except the 6 new files I just imported to check (they correctly show RAW Decoding 3.0) shows that it was decoded with RAW Decoding 2.0.
    If I push the reprocess button, my photos change slightly, becoming a little brighter, a little warmer, with a touch more saturation. I exported some JPEGs to compare to pictures I have outside Aperture and there is a definite (but subtle) change after reprocessing compared to my original edits done in Aperture 3. All quickbrush adjustments are available for all RAW files as well, which I thought was only possible if the file was updated to the latest processing...but I'm not sure about that.
    I restored my library from a vault (updated about 1 week ago, unsure if before/after this issue began) and I get the same message. The only change I've made recently has been installing the Camera RAW update that came about in the past few weeks. Is it possible that made this suddenly start happening?
    Of course I want to have the latest RAW decoding for my files, but I'm concerned that pictures I edited and exported months ago appear to have a different version of RAW processing than Aperture now wants to give my files. Anyone with a clue of what's going on or what I can do to troubleshoot this issue.

    Aperture user since v1.0. Nikon D70.
    You're not alone. This message has recently appeared on my entire library of D70 RAW images, excluding my two most recent imports.
    At the same time, many precious, carefully hand tweaked images have taken on a very pronounced dark green colour cast (which renders them as completely useless). It seems that the more carefully the file had been tweaked, the more likely it was to have been affected by the dark green cast. I am extremely disappointed by this.
    FWIW. Depending on their vintage my images may have been originally processed in RAW Decode v1, v1.1, v2 or v3. All images were reprocessed in RAW Decode v3 when Aperture 3 was originally released.
    Reprocessing the images using RAW Decode Version 3 removes this colour cast but also creates images of a different pixel size! Previously they were 3024px by 1998px; after reprocessing they are 3008px by 2000px. This is the size that Adobe's and Nikon's own RAW processors produce, so the previous dimensions must be seen as Apple's mistake (I reported it as such when Aperture 1 was first released, so I suppose we should be glad that they've gotten round to fixing it).
    This change in pixel dimension is covered in support.apple.com/kb/TS3114 which says that the change occurs after upgrading to Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 3.3. Of course, the release notes for Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 3.3 made no mention of this. And Apple seem to be playing the whole affair with their customary stone wall.

  • 10.4.7 and Photoshop CS2, Adobe Camera Raw.

    Since updating to 10.4.7 Adobe Bridge will not build thumbnails of DNG files and only builds 1/6th size thumbnails of NEF files. The Camera Raw Plug-in is in the correct folder but Bridge will not show Camera Raw Preferences. All Adobe troubleshooting has been followed with no success, purging cahes etc.. No problems prior to updating to 10.4.7 and the latest iTunes. Any suggestions.

    There is no obvious reason why CS2 should not run on your G4. Have you kept the CS2 up to date? Updated Quicktime? Kept 10.4.7 up to date?
    There have been known issues which recent (over the last 2-3 months) updates from both Apple and Adobe are said to have resolved.
    One obvious suspect is third party plug-ins. Have you tried disabling them (if you have any), and then re-enabling them one by one to see if this makes a difference?
    You could also try the Adobe's own forum: http://www.adobe.com/support/forums/index.html although it can be hard to navigate!

  • Feature Request: Raw-Lite for the F5/F55

    Hi Sony Staff, Here's a feature request that I've been pondering for a long time now. Raw Lite on the F5(5). Is it a possibility? I'm a huge fan of the conventional 3:1 compressed 4K 16-bit Linear Raw from the AXS-R5. It provides a supremely high quality digital negative, with as much detail and tonality as you could ever really need. However the file sizes are very large. 1TB yeilds roughly an hour of recording time. And the storage costs associated with that are enough to scare away MANY producers from shooting Sony Raw (even with all of the benefits that doing so offers).  You guys have addressed this issue nicely with the F65 by offering Raw Lite with it's 6:1 compression (which coincidentally, is a compression rate that many, many producers are content to shoot with on the most prolific raw cameras out their - the Red Epic/Dragon/Scarlet cameras). Being able to offer producers the option to shoot Sony Raw Lite, with it's massively more managable file sizes would greatly increase the uptake of Sony Raw for production - and that benefits everyone. It benefits the camera department with a superior digital negative, it benefits post-production with greater latitude for grading and VFX, it benefits producers with a superior end product, and it benefits audiences with better looking images. Given that the F65 was able to be upgraded to offer this additional raw recording option, I assume (and hope) that it's not an impossiblity for the F5(5). So I'd urge you to strongly consider this feature request, and the added appeal it would bring to the cameras as a capture choice. Cheers, Mark

    I disagree that there is little difference between 12bit and 16 bit linear raw. The difference is huge. Shadows and dark areas from the FS7/FS700 are pretty grim, lot's of noise caused by the data rounding. Besides, in terms of bit rate it's not a question of simply reducing the bit depth, you need to increase the compression. For linear raw you need 16 bits unless you do an extreme amount of data rounding. For Linear raw, if the first stop is represented by just 2 bits of data (which results in very blocky noise as noise will be one of 4 luma levels and cannot be smoothly reproduced):  stop 1: 2 bitsstop 2: 4stop 3: 8stop 4: 16stop 5: 32stop 6: 64stop 7 128 (8 bit linear limit, 128 + 128 = 256 bits)stop 8: 256stop 9: 512 (10 bit linear limit)stop 10: 1024stop 11: 2048 (12 bit linear limit)stop 12: 4096stop 13: 8192 stop 14: 16384 bitsstop 15: 32768 bits (16 bit linear limit) If you move this scale up so that the first stop is represented by using 4 bits of data you will still have pretty coarse shadows and noise (one whole f stop will only have 16 posible luma values). So rather than just use binary math most linear raw systems use floating point math to make more bits available for the shadows. But with 12bit there just isn't anywhere near the same amount of "spare" bits that you get with 16 bit, so the shadows and low key areas really suffer. Just go and look at the FS7/FS700 boards and all the compliants about unusable, grainy and blocky shadow areas in the raw. Sure raw lite would be a welcome option, but it wouldn't be one for me. The whole point of raw for me is a robust, bomb proof format that you can expose and grade as you wish without worrying about artefacts etc.  

Maybe you are looking for